Opioid peptide receptor studies. 12. Buprenorphine is a potent and selective mu/kappa antagonist in the [35S]-GTP-gamma-S functional binding assay

An Examination of the Complex Pharmacological Properties of the Non-Selective Opioid Modulator Buprenorphine

The goal of this review is to provide a recent examination of the pharmacodynamics as well as pharmacokinetics, misuse potential, toxicology, and prenatal consequences of buprenorphine. Buprenorphine is currently a Schedule III opioid in the US used for opioid-use disorder (OUD) and as an analgesic. Buprenorphine has high affinity for the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR) and intermediate affinity for the nociceptin (NOR). Buprenorphine's active metabolite, norbuprenorphine, crosses the blood-brain barrier, is a potent metabolite that attenuates the analgesic effects of buprenorphine due to binding to NOR, and is responsible for the respiratory depressant effects. The area under the concentration curves are very similar for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, which indicates that it is important to consider this metabolite. Crowding sourcing has identified a buprenorphine street value (USD 3.95/mg), indicating some non-medical use. There have also been eleven-thousand reports involving buprenorphine and minors (age < 19) at US poison control centers. Prenatal exposure to clinically relevant dosages in rats produces reductions in myelin and increases in depression-like behavior. In conclusion, the pharmacology of this OUD pharmacotherapy including the consequences of prenatal buprenorphine exposure in humans and experimental animals should continue to be carefully evaluated.

Behavioral Effects of Opioid Full and Partial Agonists During Chronic Buprenorphine Treatment

Buprenorphine, a partial agonist at the μ-opioid receptor, is commonly prescribed for the management of opioid addiction. Notwithstanding buprenorphine's clinical popularity, the relationship between its effectiveness in attenuating relapse-related behavior and its opioid efficacy is poorly understood. Furthermore, changes in the antinociceptive potency or effectiveness of opioid drugs that might occur during buprenorphine treatment have not been characterized. Here, we address these questions by assessing the ability of daily buprenorphine treatment to protect against the reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior by six opioids differing in efficacy (methadone, heroin, oxycodone, buprenorphine, butorphanol, nalbuphine) and, in separate experiments, by determining how such treatment may modify their antinociceptive effects. In one set of experiments, squirrel monkeys were trained to respond under concurrent schedules (choice) of food or intravenous oxycodone presentations. The priming strength of different opioids during sessions in which saline, rather than oxycodone, was available for intravenous self-administration was determined before and during chronic buprenorphine treatment (0.1 or 0.32 mg/kg per day). In other subjects, antinociceptive effects of the different opioids were assessed using cumulative dosing procedures in a modified warm-water tail withdrawal procedure before and during buprenorphine treatment. Results show that, notwithstanding some tolerance, full agonists retain high efficacy in producing priming and antinociceptive effects. In contrast, both the priming strength and antinociceptive effectiveness of partial agonists were decreased. These results suggest that the utility of buprenorphine in the management of opioid addiction, and how it alters the analgesic effects of opioids, can vary depending on the efficacy of the abused or prescribed opioid. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our findings indicate that the pharmacological efficacy of abused opioids may predict the ability of buprenorphine to attenuate their relapse-related priming and analgesia-related antinociceptive effects. This information can help inform physicians as to the effectiveness and limitations of buprenorphine as a pharmacotherapy for opioid addiction.

Locomotor and anti-immobility effects of buprenorphine in combination with the opioid receptor modulator samidorphan in rats

Modulation of the opioid system has re-emerged as a potential therapeutic avenue for treating depression, with efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of buprenorphine (BUP), a partial μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist and κ-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist, and samidorphan (SAM), a potent MOR antagonist, as an adjuvant treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). To advance understanding of the mechanism of action underlying this combination, we examined BUP, SAM and their combination in a series of rat behavioural assays. We examined effects on locomotor activity in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats over an extended period of time in a home-cage tracking system, and behavioural despair (immobility) in the forced swim test (FST), a commonly-used test to study antidepressants, in SD and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. Strain differences in opioid receptor and prepropeptide mRNA expression in the brain (prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus and striatum) were examined using qRT-PCR. BUP produced locomotor hyperactivity in SD rats from 2 to 6 h following administration, which was attenuated by SAM. In SD rats, a low, but not a high, dose of SAM in combination with BUP counteracted swim-stress induced immobility. This effect was not seen with BUP alone. In contrast, BUP alone reduced immobility in WKY rats, and this effect was enhanced by a low, but not high, dose of SAM. In WKY rats, MOR mRNA expression was higher in the hippocampus and lower in the striatum vs. SD rats. KOR mRNA expression was higher in the amygdala and nociceptin receptor (NOP) mRNA expression was lower in the hippocampus vs. SD rats. Differences in opioid receptor expression may account for the differential behavioural profile of WKY and SD rats. In summary, administration of BUP, a MOR receptor agonist together with a MOR opioid-receptor antagonist, SAM, reduces behavioural despair in animal models traditionally used to study effects of antidepressants.

Mediation of buprenorphine analgesia by a combination of traditional and truncated mu opioid receptor splice variants

Buprenorphine has long been classified as a mu analgesic, although its high affinity for other opioid receptor classes and the orphanin FQ/nociceptin ORL1 receptor may contribute to its other actions. The current studies confirmed a mu mechanism for buprenorphine analgesia, implicating several subsets of mu receptor splice variants. Buprenorphine analgesia depended on the expression of both exon 1-associated traditional full length 7 transmembrane (7TM) and exon 11-associated truncated 6 transmembrane (6TM) MOR-1 variants. In genetic models, disruption of delta, kappa1 or ORL1 receptors had no impact on buprenorphine analgesia, while loss of the traditional 7TM MOR-1 variants in an exon 1 knockout (KO) mouse markedly lowered buprenorphine analgesia. Loss of the truncated 6TM variants in an exon 11 KO mouse totally eliminated buprenorphine analgesia. In distinction to analgesia, the inhibition of gastrointestinal transit and stimulation of locomotor activity were independent of truncated 6TM variants. Restoring expression of a 6TM variant with a lentivirus rescued buprenorphine analgesia in an exon 11 KO mouse that still expressed the 7TM variants. Despite a potent and robust stimulation of (35) S-GTPγS binding in MOR-1 expressing CHO cells, buprenorphine failed to recruit β-arrestin-2 binding at doses as high as 10 µM. Buprenorphine was an antagonist in DOR-1 expressing cells and an inverse agonist in KOR-1 cells. Buprenorphine analgesia is complex and requires multiple mu receptor splice variant classes but other actions may involve alternative receptors.

Buprenorphine + naloxone plus naltrexone for the treatment of cocaine dependence: the Cocaine Use Reduction with Buprenorphine (CURB) study

AIMS

To examine the safety and effectiveness of buprenorphine + naloxone sublingual tablets (BUP, as Suboxone(®) ) provided after administration of extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX, as Vivitrol(®) ) to reduce cocaine use in participants who met DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence and past or current opioid dependence or abuse.

METHODS

This multi-centered, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted under the auspices of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, randomly assigned 302 participants at sites in California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, New York and Washington DC, USA to one of three conditions provided with XR-NTX: 4 mg/day BUP (BUP4, n = 100), 16 mg/day BUP (BUP16, n = 100, or no buprenorphine (placebo; PLB, n = 102). Participants received pharmacotherapy for 8 weeks, with three clinic visits per week. Cognitive behavioral therapy was provided weekly. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 and 3 months post-intervention. The planned primary outcome was urine drug screen (UDS)-corrected, self-reported cocaine use during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Planned secondary analyses assessed cocaine use by UDS, medication adherence, retention and adverse events.

RESULTS

No group differences were found between groups for the primary outcome (BUP4 versus PLB, P = 0.262; BUP16 versus PLB, P = 0.185). Longitudinal analysis of UDS data during the evaluation period using generalized linear mixed equations found a statistically significant difference between BUP16 and PLB [P = 0.022, odds ratio (OR) = 1.71] but not for BUP4 (P = 0.105, OR = 1.05). No secondary outcome differences across groups were found for adherence, retention or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine + naloxone, used in combination with naltrexone, may be associated with reductions in cocaine use among people who meet DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence and past or current opioid dependence or abuse.

Searching for evidence of genetic mediation of opioid withdrawal by opioid receptor gene polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Previous research has identified many genetic polymorphisms that appear to mediate the effects of opioid drugs. However, the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and the severity of opioid withdrawal has not yet been characterized.

METHODS

Data were collected from 48 daily heroin users who previously completed a standardized abstinence-induced or naloxone-precipitated withdrawal procedure to assess opioid dependence. The total withdrawal severity score (based on the COWS) from this procedure was correlated with genotype information for variants of OPRM1 (rs1799971; rs6848893), OPRD1 (rs10753331; rs2234918; rs581111; rs678849; rs1042114), and OPRK1 (rs6473797; rs963549). Genotype and other participant variables (age, race, sex, duration of drug use, concomitant drug use, route of opioid use) were used as predictors.

RESULTS

Of these variables, those individually correlated with a p < .2 were entered into a multivariate regression in order to identify the most predictive model. Three polymorphisms were significantly associated with severity of abstinence-induced withdrawal (n = 19) in the bivariate analysis (R): OPRM1 rs6848893 (.45), OPRD1 rs10753331 (.03), and rs678849 (.08), but only the OPRM1 rs6848893 was retained in the multivariate model (p < .001). For participants who underwent naloxone-precipitated withdrawal (n = 29) only OPRK1 rs6473797 (-.23) was significant in the bivariate analysis, though not retained in the final model.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide evidence for genetic modulation of opioid withdrawal severity, and suggest there may be qualitative differences between withdrawal resulting from abstinence and antagonist-precipitated withdrawal.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrates the importance and feasibility of incorporating genetic information into clinical addiction research.

Synthesis and evaluation of three structurally related ¹⁸F-labeled orvinols of different intrinsic activities: 6-O-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl-diprenorphine ([¹⁸F]FDPN), 6-O-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl-buprenorphine ([¹⁸F]FBPN), and 6-O-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl-phenethyl-orvinol ([¹⁸F]FPEO)

We report the synthesis and biological evaluation of a triplet of 6-O-(18)F-fluoroethylated derivatives of structurally related orvinols that span across the full range of intrinsic activities, the antagonist diprenorphine, the partial agonist buprenorphine, and the full agonist phenethyl-orvinol. [(18)F]fluoroethyl-diprenorphine, [(18)F]fluoroethyl-buprenorphine, and [(18)F]fluoroethyl-phenethyl-orvinol were prepared in high yields and quality from their 6-O-desmethyl-precursors. The results indicate suitable properties of the three 6-O-(18)F-fluoroethylated derivatives as functional analogues to the native carbon-11 labeled versions with similar pharmacological properties.

Effect of Iboga alkaloids on µ-opioid receptor-coupled G protein activation

OBJECTIVE

The iboga alkaloids are a class of small molecules defined structurally on the basis of a common ibogamine skeleton, some of which modify opioid withdrawal and drug self-administration in humans and preclinical models. These compounds may represent an innovative approach to neurobiological investigation and development of addiction pharmacotherapy. In particular, the use of the prototypic iboga alkaloid ibogaine for opioid detoxification in humans raises the question of whether its effect is mediated by an opioid agonist action, or if it represents alternative and possibly novel mechanism of action. The aim of this study was to independently replicate and extend evidence regarding the activation of μ-opioid receptor (MOR)-related G proteins by iboga alkaloids.

METHODS

Ibogaine, its major metabolite noribogaine, and 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), a synthetic congener, were evaluated by agonist-stimulated guanosine-5´-O-(γ-thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPγS) binding in cells overexpressing the recombinant MOR, in rat thalamic membranes, and autoradiography in rat brain slices.

RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE

In rat thalamic membranes ibogaine, noribogaine and 18-MC were MOR antagonists with functional Ke values ranging from 3 uM (ibogaine) to 13 uM (noribogaine and 18MC). Noribogaine and 18-MC did not stimulate [(35)S]GTPγS binding in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human or rat MORs, and had only limited partial agonist effects in human embryonic kidney cells expressing mouse MORs. Ibogaine did not did not stimulate [(35)S]GTPγS binding in any MOR expressing cells. Noribogaine did not stimulate [(35)S]GTPγS binding in brain slices using autoradiography. An MOR agonist action does not appear to account for the effect of these iboga alkaloids on opioid withdrawal. Taken together with existing evidence that their mechanism of action also differs from that of other non-opioids with clinical effects on opioid tolerance and withdrawal, these findings suggest a novel mechanism of action, and further justify the search for alternative targets of iboga alkaloids.

A combination of buprenorphine and naltrexone blocks compulsive cocaine intake in rodents without producing dependence

Buprenorphine, a synthetic opioid that acts at both μ and κ opioid receptors, can decrease cocaine use in individuals with opioid addiction. However, the potent agonist action of buprenorphine at μ opioid receptors raises its potential for creating opioid dependence in non-opioid-dependent cocaine abusers. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a combination of buprenorphine and naltrexone (a potent μ opioid antagonist with weaker δ and κ antagonist properties) could block compulsive cocaine self-administration without producing opioid dependence. The effects of buprenorphine and various doses of naltrexone on cocaine self-administration were assessed in rats that self-administered cocaine under conditions of either short access (noncompulsive cocaine seeking) or extended access (compulsive cocaine seeking). Buprenorphine alone reproducibly decreased cocaine self-administration. Although this buprenorphine-alone effect was blocked in a dose-dependent manner by naltrexone in both the short-access and the extended-access groups, the combination of the lowest dose of naltrexone with buprenorphine blocked cocaine self-administration in the extended-access group but not in the short-access group. Rats given this low dose of naltrexone with buprenorphine did not exhibit the physical opioid withdrawal syndrome seen in rats treated with buprenorphine alone, and naltrexone at this dose did not block κ agonist-induced analgesia. The results suggest that the combination of buprenorphine and naltrexone at an appropriate dosage decreases compulsive cocaine self-administration with minimal liability to produce opioid dependence and may be useful as a treatment for cocaine addiction.

Buprenorphine and opioid antagonism, tolerance, and naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal

The dual antagonist effects of the mixed-action μ-opioid partial agonist/κ-opioid antagonist buprenorphine have not been previously compared in behavioral studies, and it is unknown whether they are comparably modified by chronic exposure. To address this question, the dose-related effects of levorphanol, trans-(-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl] benzeneacetamide (U50,488), heroin, and naltrexone on food-maintained behavior in rhesus monkeys were studied after acute and chronic treatment with buprenorphine (0.3 mg/kg/day). In acute studies, the effects of levorphanol and U50,488 were determined at differing times after buprenorphine (0.003-10.0 mg/kg i.m.). Results show that buprenorphine produced similar, dose-dependent rightward shifts of the levorphanol and U50,488 dose-response curves that persisted for ≥ 24 h after doses larger than 0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine. During chronic treatment with buprenorphine, the effects of levorphanol, U50,488, heroin, and naltrexone were similarly determined at differing times (10 min to 48 h) after intramuscular injection. Overall, results show that buprenorphine produced comparable 3- to 10-fold rightward shifts in the U50,488 dose-response curve under both acute and chronic conditions, but that chronic buprenorphine produced larger (10- to ≥ 30-fold) rightward shifts in the heroin dose-effect function than observed acutely. Naltrexone decreased operant responding in buprenorphine-treated monkeys, and the position of the naltrexone dose-effect curve shifted increasingly to the left as the time after daily buprenorphine treatment increased from 10 min to 48 h. These results suggest that the μ-antagonist, but not the κ-antagonist, effects of buprenorphine are augmented during chronic treatment. In addition, the leftward shift of the naltrexone dose-effect function suggests that daily administration of 0.3 mg/kg buprenorphine is adequate to produce opioid dependence.

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine (BuTrans seven-day patches) with buprenorphine sublingual tablets (Temgesic) in patients with osteoarthritis pain

CONTEXT

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of chronic pain, particularly in the older population. Modern approaches to the management of OA pain recommend tailoring treatment to the individual. This study examines treatment options for OA pain in the form of low-dose transdermal and sublingual opioid analgesia.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this trial were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of seven-day, low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (BuTrans, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited UK) with sublingual buprenorphine (Temgesic, Schering-Plough Limited UK) in patients with moderate to severe pain caused by OA of the hip(s) and/or knee(s), and to establish analgesic equivalence of the two products.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-six patients with OA pain in the hip(s) and/or knee(s) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study; 110 completed the study. Patients were randomized to receive transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/hour) or sublingual buprenorphine (200 and 400 microg tablets). Their medication was titrated to pain control and they were treated for up to seven weeks. The main outcome measures were pain intensity (primary outcome), sleep disturbance, quality of life, and safety assessments.

RESULTS

Patients' Box Scale-11 pain scores decreased between entry and assessment in both treatment groups. During the 28-day assessment period, the estimated mean treatment differences (95% confidence intervals) were 0.00 (-0.68,0.69), -0.11 (-0.85,0.63), and -0.13 (-0.95,0.68), for the morning, midday, and evening scores, respectively. All the confidence intervals were within the prespecified limits for equivalence (-1.5, 1.5). Use of escape medication was low. In both treatment groups, sleep disturbance caused by pain decreased between entry and assessment. Patients' quality of life improved during the study. Significantly fewer patients receiving the transdermal buprenorphine patches reported nausea (P=0.035), dizziness (P=0.026), and vomiting (P=0.039).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, seven-day, low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches are as effective as sublingual buprenorphine, with a better tolerability profile.

Managing severe cancer pain: the role of transdermal buprenorphine: a systematic review

Pain is a frequent and important symptom in cancer patients. Among the available strong opioids, transdermal buprenorphine has been licensed in Europe since 2002, and results from a few clinical studies suggest that it may be a good alternative to the other oral or transdermal opioids. To assess the best available evidence on its efficacy and safety, we carried out a systematic literature review with the aim of pooling relevant studies. We identified 19 eligible papers describing 12 clinical studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 6 observational prospective studies), including a total of about 5000 cancer patients. Given the poor quality of reports and the heterogeneity of methods and outcomes, pooling was not feasible as the type of data was not appropriate for combining the results statistically. A meta-analysis based on individual data is ongoing in the context of the Cochrane Collaboration. In conclusion, although the narrative appraisal of each study suggests a positive risk benefit profile, well designed and statistically powered controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.

Inhibition of kappa opioid receptors attenuated increased cocaine intake in rats with extended access to cocaine

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies demonstrated that the dynorphin/kappa opioid system was up-regulated upon repeated cocaine self-administration. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that increased cocaine self-administration with extended access was associated with increased activity of the kappa opioid system in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats self-administered 0.5 mg/kg per injection of cocaine on a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule in either 1-h (short access, ShA) or 6-h (long access, LgA) sessions. After cocaine intake in the LgA rats increased to a maximum, the effects of kappa opioid receptor antagonists and a partial agonist were tested on cocaine intake in ShA and LgA rats.

RESULTS

Cocaine self-administration increased under FR and progressive-ratio (PR) schedules in LgA rats. Nor-BNI (15-30 mg/kg), a kappa receptor antagonist, decreased cocaine intake in LgA rats under a PR schedule (ShA, +1.7%; LgA, -27.4% from baseline), whereas naltrexone (0.3-10 mg/kg) and SG-II-49 (0.025-0.1 mg/kg), a nonspecific opioid receptor antagonist and a partial agonist, respectively, decreased cocaine intake in both groups (PR data: SG-II-49, ShA -28.6%, LgA -19.8%; naltrexone, ShA -34.6%, LgA -11.8% compared with vehicle data).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that the antagonism of kappa opioid receptors attenuated only the increased cocaine intake in LgA rats under a PR schedule, whereas the antagonism of micro and kappa receptors decreased cocaine intake in both ShA and LgA groups. The data suggest that increased motivation for cocaine in rats with extended access may be related to increased kappa opioid activity and may contribute to compulsive use.

The kappa-opiate receptor impacts the pathophysiology and behavior of substance use

There is increasing evidence that the kappa-opiate receptor, in addition to the mu-opiate receptor, plays an important role in substance use pathophysiology and behavior. As dopamine activity is upregulated through chronic substance use, kappa receptor activity, mediated through the peptide dynorphin, is upregulated in parallel. Dynorphin causes dysphoria and decreased locomotion, and the upregulation of its activity on the kappa receptor likely dampens the excitation caused by increased dopaminergic activity. This feedback mechanism may have significant clinical implications for treating drug dependent patients in various stages of their pathology.

Association analysis of genes encoding the nociceptin receptor (OPRL1) and its endogenous ligand (PNOC) with alcohol or illicit drug dependence

Recent studies in animal models have shown that the nociceptin system, comprising nociceptin (or OFQ/N, encoded by PNOC) and the nociceptin receptor (an opioid receptor-like protein encoded by OPRL1), may be involved in alcohol and other drug reward pathways. To determine whether the nociceptin system is associated with alcohol or illicit drug dependence in humans, we analyzed 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in OPRL1 and 15 SNPs in PNOC in a sample of 1923 European Americans from 219 multiplex alcohol dependent families ascertained by the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. The SNPs spanned both genes and several kb of their flanking sequences, and were in high linkage disequilibrium. Neither gene was associated with alcohol or illicit drug dependence, although two SNPs in PNOC showed marginal association with alcoholism and one with illicit drug dependence (P = 0.04-0.05). Secondary analyses suggested that two adjacent SNPs in intron 1 of OPRL1 were marginally associated with opioid dependence (P = 0.05); none of the SNPs in PNOC were associated with opioid dependence.

Opioid rotation from high-dose morphine to transdermal buprenorphine (Transtec) in chronic pain patients

Opioid rotation is increasingly becoming an option to improve pain management especially in long-term treatment. Because of insufficient analgesia and intolerable side effects, a total of 42 patients (23 male, 19 female; mean age 64.1 years) suffering from severe musculoskeletal (64%), cancer (21%) or neuropathic (19%) pain were converted from high-dose morphine (120 to >240 mg/day) to transdermal buprenorphine. The dose of buprenorphine necessary for conversion (at least 52.5 microg/h) was titrated individually by the treating physician. No conversion recommendations were given and the treating physician used his or her own judgment for dose adjustment. Pain relief, overall satisfaction and quality of sleep (very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or very poor), and the incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions over a period of at least 10 weeks and up to 1 year was assessed. Following rotation, patients experiencing good/very good pain relief increased from 5% to 76% (P < 0.001). Only 5% reported insufficient relief. Relief was achieved with buprenorphine alone in 77.4%, while 17% needed an additional opioid for breakthrough pain. Sleep quality (good/very good) increased from 14% to 74% (P < 0.005). Adverse effects were reported in 11.9%, mostly because of local irritation, did not result in termination of therapy. Neither tolerance nor refractory effect following rotation from morphine to buprenorphine was noted. Conversion tables with a fixed conversion ratio are of limited value in patients treated with high-dose morphine.

Blockade of morphine-induced behavioral sensitization by a combination of amisulpride and RB101, comparison with classical opioid maintenance treatments

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Maintenance treatments with methadone or buprenorphine are more or less efficient procedures for helping heroin addicts to stop or reduce drug abuse. Another approach to treat opiate dependence could be to target the endogenous opioid system by enhancing the effects of enkephalins by protecting them from enzymic degradation by the dual peptidase inhibitor RB101.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

As chronic treatment with the dopamine D2 antagonist amisulpride facilitates RB101-induced behavioral effects, we chose in this study to treat mice previously sensitized to the hyperlocomotor effects induced by morphine with a combination of amisulpride and RB101.

KEY RESULTS

Expression of morphine-induced locomotor sensitization was abolished after combined treatment with amisulpride (20 mg x kg(-1), i.p.) and RB101 (80 mg x kg(-1), i.p.), whereas these drugs were not effective when used alone. We then compared these results with the effects of amisulpride combined with buprenorphine (0.1 mg x kg(-1), i.p.) or methadone (2.5 mg x kg(-1), i.p.) upon morphine-induced behavioral sensitization. Whereas the combination of amisulpride and buprenorphine partially blocked the expression of morphine sensitization, amisulpride+methadone was not effective in this paradigm.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The combination of amisulpride+RB101 appears to be very efficient in blocking the expression of morphine-induced behavioral sensitization. This could reflect a reinstatement of a balance between the function of the dopamine and opioid systems and could represent a new approach in maintenance treatments for opiate addiction.

Dexamethasone hepatic induction in rats subsequently treated with high dose buprenorphine does not lead to respiratory depression

In humans, asphyxic deaths and severe poisonings have been attributed to high-dosage buprenorphine, a maintenance therapy for heroin addiction. However, in rats, intravenous buprenorphine at doses up to 90 mg kg(-1) was not associated with significant effects on arterial blood gases. In contrast, norbuprenorphine, the buprenorphine major cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-derived metabolite, is a potent respiratory depressant. Thus, our aim was to study the consequences of CYP3A induction on buprenorphine-associated effects on resting ventilation in rats. We investigated the effects on ventilation of 30 mg kg(-1) buprenorphine alone or following cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A induction with dexamethasone, using whole body plethysmography (N=24) and arterial blood gases (N=12). Randomized animals in 4 groups received sequential intraperitoneal dosing with: (dexamethasone [days 1-3]+buprenorphine [day 4]), (dexamethasone solvent [days 1-3]+buprenorphine [day 4]), (dexamethasone [days 1-3]+buprenorphine solvent [day 4]), or (dexamethasone solvent [days 1-3]+buprenorphine solvent [day 4]). Buprenorphine alone caused a significant rapid and sustained increase in the inspiratory time (P<0.001), without significant effects on the respiratory frequency, the tidal volume, the minute volume, or arterial blood gases. In dexamethasone-pretreated rats, there was no significant alteration in the respiratory parameters, despite CYP3A induction and significant increase of the ratio of plasma norbuprenorphine-to-buprenorphine concentrations. In conclusion, dexamethasone did not modify the effects of 30 mg kg(-1) buprenorphine on rat ventilation. Our results suggest a limited role of drug-mediated CYP3A induction in the occurrence of buprenorphine-attributed respiratory depression in addicts.

Interactions of buprenorphine and dipotassium clorazepate on anxiety and memory functions in the mouse

Buprenorphine, a partial mu-receptor agonist widely substituted for heroin in the treatment of addiction, is often misused in combination with benzodiazepines. Improved hedonic properties may result, but only at the cost of increased buprenorphine toxicity. In order to elucidate the appeal of the benzodiazepine-buprenorphine combination, the present study looked at its neuropsycho-pharmacological effects on various emotional and cognitive parameters in the mouse. On the basis of previous dose-response studies, the regimen used was buprenorphine 0.3mg/kg, s.c. plus dipotassium clorazepate 1, 4 and 16 mg/kg, i.p. Anxiety-like behaviour was assessed using the black and white test box, and memory processes were examined via the spontaneous alternation paradigm in the Y-maze, and passive avoidance tests. Spontaneous locomotor activity was also evaluated. High doses of clorazepate impaired buprenorphine-induced hyperactivity and anxiogenic-like effects. They also increased buprenorphine-induced spontaneous alternation impairment, but did not modify its impact on long-term memory processes. These results suggest that the positive reinforcement experienced with the buprenorphine-benzodiazepine combination may be attributable, at least in part, to an increase in buprenorphine's sedative effect associated with a decrease in anxiogenicity.

Comparison of the in vitro efficacy of mu, delta, kappa and ORL1 receptor agonists and non-selective opioid agonists in dog brain membranes

Morphine and related opioid agonists are frequently used in dogs for their analgesic properties, their sedative effects and as adjuncts to anesthesia. Such compounds may be effective through a combined action at mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors. In this work, the in vitro relative agonist efficacy of ligands selective for mu (DAMGO)-, delta (SNC80)- and kappa (U69593)-opioid receptors as well as the opioid receptor-like receptor ORL(1) (orphaninFQ/nociceptin) which may mediate nociceptive or antinociceptive actions was determined using the [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay in membrane homogenates from the frontal cortex, thalamus and spinal cord of beagle dogs. In addition, other analgesics commonly used in the dog were investigated. For the receptor-selective compounds, maximum stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding decreased in the order kappa > ORL1 > delta > mu in cortical homogenates, compared with mu > ORL1 > kappa > delta in thalamic and spinal cord homogenates. For other opioids examined, efficacy decreased in the order etorphine >> morphine > fentanyl = oxymorphine > butorphanol = oxycodone = nalbuphine. There was no significant difference in the potency of compounds to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding between cortex and thalamus, with the exception of etorphine. Buprenorphine, the partial mu-opioid receptor agonist and kappa-, delta-opioid receptor antagonist, which does have analgesic efficacy in the dog, showed no agonism in any tissue but was an effective mu-opioid receptor > ORL1 receptor antagonist. The results show that the ability of agonists to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding relates to the receptor distribution of opioid and ORL1 receptors in the dog.

Clorazepate affects cell surface regulation of delta and kappa opioid receptors, thereby altering buprenorphine-induced adaptation in the rat brain

Concomitant abuse of buprenorphine (BPN) and benzodiazepines (BZD) may relate to a pharmacodynamic interaction between the two. The objective of the present work was to investigate the acute and chronic effects of clorazepate (CRZ) alone or in combination with BPN on selective kappa opiate tritiated ligand [3H]-U69 593 and delta opiate radioligand [3H]-deltorphine II binding in the rat brain. Bmax (maximal receptor density) and Kd (the dissociation constant) were directly determined at different brain regions of interest (ROI) selected for high densities of kappa and/or delta receptors in rats treated with BPN and/or CRZ. The agents were administered either once or for 21 consecutive days. Differences in Bmax and Kd (for both specific ligands) were related to drug treatment and receptor location. Globally, single BPN administration induced no changes in kappa or delta opiate receptor binding, whereas repeated BPN administration up-regulated kappa receptor density and decreased delta affinity. At the kappa receptor level, repeated administration of CRZ acted only on Kd, whereas the delta receptor was up-regulated. Repeated addition of CRZ to BPN had no effect on kappa receptor Bmax versus chronic controls. By significantly decreasing Bmax, CRZ nullified the effect of chronic BPN on the kappa receptor. The modifications were strongest in the nucleus accumbens, where both types of receptor occur. Treatments had region-selective effects in some brain areas, such as the amygdala, periaqueductal gray matter, hypothalamus and caudate putamen. Increased mu and delta receptor densities would be expected to provide reinforcement by enhancing reward, and impairment of kappa receptor availability would be expected to decrease aversion. The effects described are likely to influence addictive behavior among people abusing BZD and BPN.

High-dose buprenorphine: perioperative precautions and management strategies

Buprenorphine has been in clinical use in anaesthesia for several decades. Recently, the high-dose sublingual formulation (Subutex, Reckitt Benckiser, Slough, U.K.) has been increasingly used as maintenance therapy in opioid dependence, as an alternative to methadone and other pharmacological therapies. Buprenorphine has unique pharmacological properties making it well suited for use as a maintenance therapy in opioid dependence. However, these same properties may cause difficulty in the perioperative management of pain. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist, attenuating the effects of supplemental illicit or therapeutic opioid agonists. As a result of its high receptor affinity, supplemental opioids do not readily displace buprenorphine from the opioid receptor in standard doses. High-dose buprenorphine has an extended duration of action that prolongs both of these effects. The perioperative management of patients stabilized on high-dose buprenorphine and undergoing surgery requires consideration of the likely analgesic requirements. Where possible the buprenorphine should be continued. Pain management should focus on maximizing non-opioid analgesia, local anaesthesia and non-pharmacological techniques. Where pain may not be adequately relieved by these methods, the addition of a full opioid agonist such as fentanyl or morphine at appropriate doses should be considered, accompanied by close monitoring in a high dependency unit. In situations where this regimen is unlikely to be effective, preoperative conversion to morphine or methadone may be an option. Where available, liaison with a hospital-based alcohol and drug service should always be considered.

Buprenorphine blocks epsilon- and micro-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception in the mouse

Antagonistic properties of buprenorphine for epsilon- and micro -opioid receptors were characterized in beta-endorphin- and [d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced antinociception, respectively, with the tail-flick test in male ICR mice. epsilon-Opioid receptor agonist beta-endorphin (0.1-1 micro g), micro -opioid receptor agonist DAMGO (0.5-20 ng), or buprenorphine (0.1-20 micro g) administered i.c.v. dose dependently produced antinociception. The antinociception induced by 10 micro g of buprenorphine given i.c.v. was completely blocked by the pretreatment with beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) (0.3 micro g i.c.v.), indicating that the buprenophine-induced antinociception is mediated by the stimulation of the micro -opioid receptor. The antinociceptive effects induced by beta-endorphin (1 micro g i.c.v.) and DAMGO (16 ng i.c.v.) were dose dependently blocked by pretreatment with smaller doses of buprenorphine (0.001-1 micro g i.c.v.), but not by a higher dose of buprenorphine (10 micro g i.c.v.). beta-FNA at a dose (0.3 micro g i.c.v.) that strongly attenuated DAMGO-induced antinociception had no effect on the antinociception produced by beta-endorphin (1 micro g i.c.v.). However, pretreatment with buprenorphine (0.1-10 micro g) in mice pretreated with this same dose of beta-FNA was effective in blocking beta-endorphin-induced antinociception. beta-FNA was 226-fold more effective at antagonizing the antinociception induced by DAMGO (16 ng i.c.v.) than by beta-endorphin (1 micro g i.c.v.). The antinociception induced by delta-opioid receptor agonist [d-Ala2]deltorphin II (10 micro g i.c.v.) or kappa1-opioid receptor agonist trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]cyclohexyl)benzeneacetamine methanesulfonate salt [(-)-U50,488H] (75 micro g i.c.v.) was not affected by pretreatment with buprenorphine (0.1-1.0 micro g i.c.v.). It is concluded that buprenorphine, at small doses, blocks epsilon-opioid receptor-mediated beta-endorphin-induced antinociception and micro -opioid receptor-mediated DAMGO-induced antinociception, and at high doses produces a micro -opioid receptor-mediated antinociception.

Use of irreversible antagonists to determine the relative efficacy of mu-opioids in a pigeon drug discrimination procedure: comparison of beta-funaltrexamine and clocinnamox

The use of irreversible antagonists to assess opioid efficacy has proven fruitful for classifying opioids on the basis of high or low efficacy, but few studies have provided quantitative estimates of efficacy. The purpose of this study was to use beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) and clocinnamox (C-CAM) in a drug discrimination procedure to examine the efficacy of fentanyl, morphine, l-methadone, sufentanil, and etorphine. In pigeons trained to discriminate 0.12 mg/kg fentanyl from water, dose-effect curves were determined for each opioid alone and after pretreatment with beta-FNA and C-CAM. Using quantitative analyses according to an extended model of Black and Leff (1983), apparent efficacy (tau) and affinity (KA) of each opioid was determined, as well as the degree of receptor inactivation (q) produced by each dose of each antagonist. beta-FNA and C-CAM produced dose- and time-dependent, rightward shifts in the dose-effect curves of each opioid, and analyses based on dose-ratios and tau values suggest a rank order of efficacy of etorphine > sufentanil = l-methadone > fentanyl = morphine. Marked differences in the profiles of antagonism produced by beta-FNA and C-CAM were also apparent, as C-CAM, but not beta-FNA, produced insurmountable antagonism. The q values for each antagonist were consistent with these data in indicating that C-CAM and beta-FNA can inactivate nearly 100 and 75% of the receptor population, respectively. In tests conducted in pigeons chronically treated with morphine, doses of beta-FNA that produced parallel, rightward shifts in untreated pigeons flattened the morphine dose-effect curve in morphine-treated pigeons. These results indicate that beta-FNA and C-CAM can differentiate opioids with high relative efficacy and yield comparable estimates of efficacy for various opioids. There are, however, limitations in the proportion of the receptor population that can by eliminated by beta-FNA.

Interactions between opioids and cocaine on locomotor activity in rats: influence of an opioid's relative efficacy at the mu receptor

RATIONALE

Cocaine and mu opioid agonists increase central dopamine concentrations and produce robust interactions at both neurochemical and behavioral levels. Although the interactions between cocaine and high-efficacy mu opioids have been well characterized, the interactions between cocaine and lower efficacy opioids have not been as extensively examined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the interactions between cocaine and opioids possessing a range of relative efficacy at the mu receptor.

METHODS

Male, Long-Evans rats were habituated to an open-field, locomotor activity chamber, and the effects of cocaine and various opioids were tested under a cumulative dosing procedure. In this procedure, a selected dose of an opioid was administered during the first component of a session, with increasing doses of cocaine administered during subsequent components.

RESULTS

When administered alone, cocaine produced dose-dependent increases in locomotor activity that was stable across 5 weeks of behavioral testing. The high-efficacy mu opioid levorphanol, and the low-efficacy opioids buprenorphine, butorphanol, nalbuphine and (-)-pentazocine, dose-dependently enhanced the effects of cocaine at doses that did not alter locomotor activity when administered alone. In contrast, the opioid antagonist naloxone, and to a lesser extent, the kappa opioid spiradoline attenuated the effects of cocaine at doses that did not alter locomotor activity when administered alone. Across an extensive dose range, the low-efficacy opioid nalorphine failed to alter cocaine's locomotor-activating effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that low-efficacy opioids possessing significant mu-agonist activity (e.g. buprenorphine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, (-)-pentazocine) may potentiate the effects of cocaine in a manner similar to that typically observed with high-efficacy mu opioids.

Pyrogens Enhance β-Endorphin Release in Hypothalamus and Trigger Fever That Can Be Attenuated by Buprenorphine

At first, we investigated whether both beta-endorphin release level in the hypothalamus and body temperature can be altered after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of either lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), or prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) in rats. It was found that in the rat, i.c.v. administration of either LPS (0.5 microg in 10 microl), IL-1beta (10 ng in 10 microl), or PGE(2) (200 ng in 10 microl), in addition to producing fever, upregulated the immunoreactivity of beta-endorphin in the preoptic anterior hypothalamus of rat brain. Secondarily, we assessed whether the fever induced by either LPS, IL-1beta, or PGE(2) can be altered by pretreatment with buprenorphine (an opioid receptor antagonist). The results revealed that i.c.v. administration of buprenorphine (1 - 10 microg in 10 microl) alone had an insignificant effect on the body temperature. However, the fever induced by i.c.v. injection of either LPS, IL-1beta, or PGE(2) was significantly attenuated by pretreatment with i.c.v. injection of buprenorphine 1 h before the pyrogen injection in rats. The results suggest that pyrogens enhance beta-endorphin release in the hypothalamus and trigger fever which can be attenuated by buprenorphine, an opioid receptor antagonist.

Buprenorphine: an analgesic with an expanding role in the treatment of opioid addiction

Buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid with both agonist and antagonist properties, binds to mu-opioid (OP(3)), kappa-opioid (OP(2)), delta-opioid (OP(1)), and nociceptin (ORL-1) receptors. Its actions at these receptors have not been completely characterized, although buprenorphine is generally regarded as a mu-opioid receptor partial agonist and a kappa-opioid receptor antagonist. Its pharmacology is further complicated by an active metabolite, norbuprenorphine. Although buprenorphine can be used as an analgesic agent, it is of greater importance in the treatment of opioid abuse. Because of its partial agonist activity at mu-opioid receptors and its long half-life, buprenorphine has proven to be an excellent alternative to methadone for either maintenance therapy or detoxification of the opioid addict. Although buprenorphine may ultimately prove to be superior to methadone in the maintenance of the pregnant addict, its effects on the developing fetus must be carefully evaluated.

Delta opioid antagonist effects of buprenorphine in rhesus monkeys

Buprenorphine is an opioid with high affinity for delta, mu and kappa opioid receptors. The delta receptor-mediated effects of buprenorphine have not been studied. Thus, the present study examined the delta receptor-mediated effects of buprenorphine in rhesus monkeys. assays of receptor binding and agonist-stimulated GTP S binding confirmed that buprenorphine had high affinity for, and low efficacy at, delta receptors. In an assay of schedule-controlled responding for food presentation in four monkeys, buprenorphine produced little effect alone, but it antagonized the effects of the delta agonist SNC80, the mu agonist morphine and the kappa agonist U50,488. Buprenorphine was approximately 30-fold less potent as a delta antagonist than as a mu or kappa antagonist. In three monkeys trained to discriminate SNC80 from saline, buprenorphine alone produced only saline-appropriate responding, and buprenorphine pretreatment antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of SNC80. In a fourth monkey, buprenorphine produced a partial substitution for SNC80 that could be blocked by the delta-selective antagonist naltrindole but not by the mu-selective antagonist quadazocine. These results indicate that, in rhesus monkeys, buprenorphine has very low efficacy at delta receptors, and that buprenorphine produces delta receptor-mediated effects with lower potency than it produces mu or kappa receptor-mediated effects.

The role of spinal opioid receptors in antinociceptive effects produced by intrathecal administration of hydromorphone and buprenorphine in the rat

The intrathecal administration of morphine has been the standard therapy to control long-term intractable pain. Recently, a panel of pain therapy experts suggested that because of the lack of efficacy or because of the side effects produced by morphine in some patients, other drugs, such as hydromorphone and buprenorphine, should be investigated for their analgesic properties. We designed this study to compare the efficacy of intrathecal hydromorphone and buprenorphine to suppress thermal nociception in male Sprague-Dawley rats. An additional objective was to understand whether hydromorphone and buprenorphine bind and act as agonists to mu-, delta-, and kappa-spinal opioid receptors. Intrathecally-administered hydromorphone and buprenorphine produced a dose- and time-dependent increase in the tail-flick response latency in rats. The 50% effective dose value for the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine and hydromorphone were 4 and 69.5 nmol/L, respectively. Both drugs act as agonists to mu-opioid receptors, as determined by their ability to displace [(3)H]-DAMGO from the spinal opioid receptors and by the ability of an opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, to reverse their antinociceptive effects. Buprenorphine also has an agonistic effect on the kappa-opioid receptors. For the first time, we report that intrathecal buprenorphine is approximately 17 times more effective than hydromorphone in inhibiting thermal pain, and buprenorphine produces its antinociceptive effect by acting as an agonist at both mu- and kappa-spinal opioid receptors. Naloxone administered intrathecally was effective in preventing the antinociceptive effects of subsequent intrathecal injections of buprenorphine.

IMPLICATIONS

Hydromorphone and buprenorphine are two important drugs used for pain relief. We observed that intrathecal buprenorphine is 17 times more potent than hydromorphone to inhibit pain in rats. Both drugs exert their effects through specific spinal opioid receptors.