Long-acting beta(2)-agonists in management of childhood asthma: A critical review of the literature

Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies in asthma

For the first 40 years of the 20th century treatment for asthma occurred in response to an asthma attack. The treatments were given by injection or orally and included the adrenergic agonists adrenalin/epinephrine and ephedrine and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline. Epinephrine became available as an aerosol in 1930. After 1945, isoprenaline, a non-selective beta agonist, became available for oral use but it was most widely used by inhalation. Isoprenaline was short-acting with unwanted cardiac effects. More selective beta agonists, with a longer duration of action and fewer side-effects became available, including orciprenaline in 1967, salbutamol in 1969 and terbutaline in 1970. The inhaled steroid beclomethasone was available by 1972 and budesonide by 1982. Spirometry alone and in response to exercise was used to assess efficacy and duration of action of these drugs for the acute benefits of beta₂ agonists and the chronic benefits of corticosteroids. Early studies comparing oral and aerosol beta₂ agonists found equivalence in bronchodilator effect but the aerosol treatment was superior in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Inhaled drugs are now widely used including the long-acting beta₂ agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, and the corticosteroids, fluticasone, ciclesonide, mometasone and triamcinolone, that act locally and have low systemic bio-availability. Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies permitted direct delivery of low doses of drug to the site of action reducing the incidence of unwanted side-effects and permitting the prophylactic treatment of asthma.

The effects of asthma medications on reactive oxygen species production in human monocytes

OBJECTIVE

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease induced by many environmental factors. The inhalation of allergens and pollutants promotes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to airway inflammation, hyper-responsiveness, and remodeling in allergic asthma. The effects of asthma medications on ROS production are unclear. The present study investigated the anti-ROS effects of current asthma medications including inhaled corticosteroid (ICS; budesonide and fluticasone), leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA; montelukast), long-acting β2 agonists (LABAs; salmeterol and formoterol), and a new extra-LABA (indacaterol).

METHODS

The human monocyte cell line THP-1 cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of the asthma medications at different time points after hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) stimulation. H₂O₂ production was measured with DCFH-DA by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Montelukast, fluticasone, and salmeterol suppressed H₂O₂-induced ROS production. Indacaterol enhanced H₂O₂-induced ROS production. Budesonide and formoterol alone had no anti-ROS effects, but the combination of these two drugs significantly suppressed H₂O₂-induced ROS production.

CONCLUSIONS

Different asthma medications have different anti-ROS effects on monocytes. The combination therapy with LABA and ICS seemed not to be the only choice for asthma control. Montelukast may also be a good supplemental treatment for the poorly controlled asthma because of its powerful anti-ROS effects. Our findings provide a novel therapeutic view in asthma.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction update-2016

The first practice parameter on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was published in 2010. This updated practice parameter was prepared 5 years later. In the ensuing years, there has been increased understanding of the pathogenesis of EIB and improved diagnosis of this disorder by using objective testing. At the time of this publication, observations included the following: dry powder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently available in the United States; if baseline pulmonary function test results are normal to near normal (before and after bronchodilator) in a person with suspected EIB, then further testing should be performed by using standardized exercise challenge or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH); and the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions (omega-3 fatty acids) has been challenged. The workgroup preparing this practice parameter updated contemporary practice guidelines based on a current systematic literature review. The group obtained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient. A search of the medical literature on PubMed was conducted, and search terms included pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and therapy (both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical) of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or exercise-induced asthma (which is no longer a preferred term); asthma; and exercise and asthma. References assessed as relevant to the topic were evaluated to search for additional relevant references. Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document the strength of the recommendation. The parameter was then evaluated by Joint Task Force reviewers and then by reviewers assigned by the parent organizations, as well as the general membership. Based on this process, the parameter can be characterized as an evidence- and consensus-based document.

Respiratory muscle strength in asthmatic children

INTRODUCTION

 Changes in the respiratory system of asthmatics are also due to the mechanical disadvantage caused by the increased airway resistance.

OBJECTIVE

 The study aims to evaluate the respiratory muscle strength and nutritional status of asthmatic children.

METHOD

 This is a prospective descriptive and transversal study with 50 children aged 7 to 12 years, who were placed into 2 groups, asthmatic and non-asthmatic. Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated on the basis of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). The nutritional status was evaluated by measuring the anthropometric data, including height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). The findings were subjected to analysis of variance, chi-square, and Student's t test, and p-values < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

 In our comparisons, we observed statistically significantly lower values for age, weight, and height in asthmatic patients: 8.52 ± 1.49 years, 30.62 ± 7.66 kg, and 129.85 ± 10.24 cm, respectively, vs. non-asthmatic children(9.79 ± 1.51 years, 39.92 ± 16.57 kg, and 139.04 ± 11.62 cm, respectively). There was no significant increase in MIP and MEP between the groups: MIP was -84.96 ± 27.52 cmH2O for the asthmatic group and -88.56 ± 26.50 cmH2O for the non-asthmatic group, and MEP was 64.48 ± 19.23 cmH2O for asthmatic children and +66.72 ± 16.56 cmH2O for non-asthmatics.

CONCLUSION

 There was no statistically significant difference between groups, but we observed that MIP and MEP were slightly higher in the non-asthmatic group than in the asthmatic group.

Systemic exposure to inhaled beclometasone/formoterol DPI is age and body size dependent

AIM

Prescription of inhaled corticosteroids to children with asthma is recommended at half the nominal dose of adults in order to reduce the risk of systemic side effects. However, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic trials supporting such dose reduction regimens. Therefore, we aimed to compare the systemic exposure to the active ingredients of a fixed dose combination of beclometasone-dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol after dry powder inhaler (DPI) administration in children, adolescents and adults.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of formoterol and beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP; active metabolite of BDP) were evaluated over 8 h from two independent studies comprising children (6-11yrs, n = 27), adolescents (12-17 yrs, n = 28) and adults (≥18 yrs, n = 30) receiving a single, fixed dose of BDP/formoterol (children: 200 μg/24 μg, adolescents and adults: 400 μg/24 μg) via DPI.

RESULTS

The systemic exposure (AUC) for children versus adults was almost doubled for formoterol and similar for B17MP despite the halved BDP dose administered in children. In adolescents the AUC for formoterol and B17MP were approximately one third higher than in adults for both compounds. Upon normalization for the BDP/formoterol dose in the three populations the AUC and peak concentration (C(max)) correlated inversely with age and body surface area of the patients (r ≤ -0.53; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The systemic exposure to the active ingredients of BDP/formoterol administered as DPI correlates inversely with age and body size suggesting that dry powder dosage regimens should be adjusted for age and body size to avoid high systemic drug levels in children.

Genetic influences on response to asthma pharmacotherapy

Asthma is a complex inflammatory disease that affects 300 million people worldwide. Safe and effective drugs control the symptoms but heterogeneity in response is large and attributable, in part, to genetic variation. Polymorphisms in several genes influence response to asthma drugs. The genotype of the ADRB2 Gly16Arg single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associates with asthma worsening during continuous therapy with β-agonists. SNPs in four genes influence response to inhaled corticosteroids: CRHR1, ACP, TBX21 and FCER2. Polymorphisms in leukotriene pathway and transporter genes influence response to zileuton and the leukotriene receptor antagonists, including ALOX5, LTA4H, LTC4S, ABCC1 and SLCO2B1. Known sequence variants explain a small fraction of response heterogeneity to asthma drugs. More studies are required to formulate a genetic signature that will lead to the personalization of asthma treatment.

Salmeterol and fluticasone in young children with multiple-trigger wheeze

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines recommend using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) for childhood asthma when the symptoms are not controlled by ICS alone, but the appropriate use of LABAs in children continues to be debated.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of an inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combination, 50/100 μg twice daily, with fluticasone propionate, 100 μg twice daily, or salmeterol, 50 μg twice daily, in children with multiple-trigger wheeze.

METHODS

A total of 105 children 4 to 7 years of age with multiple-trigger wheezing based on respiratory symptoms and bronchodilator responsiveness and/or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction without a viral cold were randomized to salmeterol-fluticasone, fluticasone propionate alone, or salmeterol alone via a metered-dose inhaler and a spacer device for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was exhaled nitric oxide level. Secondary outcomes were lung function measurements via impulse oscillometry, respiratory symptoms, and rescue medication use.

RESULTS

The exhaled nitric oxide levels decreased after all treatments, significantly more so after salmeterol-fluticasone and fluticasone than with salmeterol (adjusted geometric means at 8 weeks: salmeterol-fluticasone, 9.4 ppb; fluticasone, 9.3 ppb; salmeterol, 13.9 ppb; salmeterol-fluticasone vs salmeterol, P = .02; fluticasone vs salmeterol, P = .01). No treatment differences were found with respect to respiratory symptoms or median rescue use. Salmeterol-fluticasone resulted in a small but statistically significant improvement in baseline lung function compared with fluticasone. All treatments were equally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The effects of salmeterol-fluticasone and fluticasone were comparable, although lung function improvement was better with salmeterol-fluticasone than with fluticasone alone. There is no obvious benefit in initiation therapy with salmeterol-fluticasone rather than fluticasone alone in the treatment of steroid-naive children with multiple-trigger wheeze.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Pathway of clinical trial registry of Helsinki University:http://www.hus.fi/?Path=1;28;2530;9899;9900;23618;23903;33578.

Salmeterol or doxycycline do not inhibit acute bronchospasm and airway inflammation in cats with experimentally-induced asthma

The objective of this study was to determine if inhaled salmeterol, a long-acting β(2)-adrenergic agonist, and oral doxycycline, a tetracycline antibiotic displaying matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitory activity, reduce airway inflammation and obstruction in cats with experimentally-induced asthma. Eight Ascaris suum (AS)-sensitised cats were enrolled in a prospective study in which they underwent four AS-challenges at 1 month intervals. The challenged animals were given no treatment or were treated on 4 consecutive days with either: (1) oral prednisolone (1mg/kg twice daily), (2) inhaled salmeterol (50 μg twice daily), or (3) oral doxycycline (5mg/kg twice daily), according to a randomised cross-over design. Inhibition of allergen-induced early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic reactions were assessed by barometric whole-body plethysmography. Cytology and measurement of MMP-2 and -9 activities were carried out on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Although none of the treatments prevented the EAR, prednisolone treatment inhibited the LAR. Relative to untreated cats, the eosinophil percentage and MMP-2 activity in BALF were significantly reduced following prednisolone treatment (P<0.05). Short-term therapy with either salmeterol or doxycycline had no effect on the EAR or LAR or on airway inflammation. Given the chronic nature of this disease in cats, long-term therapy may be required to produce more favourable functional and clinical outcomes.

Time-effect of montelukast on protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

INTRODUCTION

Montelukast has been proven to assure a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

AIM

To verify exactly when montelukast begins protection in asthmatic children by evaluating different time intervals between dosing and challenge.

METHODS

In a double blind, placebo-controlled, three day doses, crossover study, patients were randomized to receive in sequence treatment with either a placebo or montelukast and assigned to one of seven groups that were tested 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 h after drug administration, respectively. For each group, the exercise challenge was always performed at the same hour on the first and third days of treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine asthmatic children took part in the study. On day 3, the mean FEV(1) % fall from baseline was 25.54 (95% CI = 21.63/29.46) and 14.89 (95% CI = 11.85/17.92) for the placebo and active drug (p < 0.05), respectively. On day 1, the mean fall of FEV(1) was 28.20 (95% CI = 24.46/31.94) and 19.01 (95% CI = 15.71/22.31) for the placebo and montelukast (p < 0.05), respectively. Clinical protection was achieved in 21 (30%) and 33 (48%) subjects by montelukast on the first and third days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast assured protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction from the first through the eighth hour from the first day of treatment. However, individual susceptibility to protection was evident since some individuals were not protected at any time. We conclude that in clinical use individual responses to the drug should be carefully evaluated in the follow-up management.

Anti-leukotrienes in Childhood Asthma

Bronchial asthma is an inflammatory condition. The inflammatory actions of leukotrienes (LT) B4, C4, D4, and E4 have been shown experimentally to play a role in inflammatory mechanisms, producing asthma. Antileukotrienes (ALT) or leukotrienes antagonists (LA) is a new class of anti-asthma drugs with anti-inflammatory role. LT modifiers from the groups of 5 lipoxygenase inhibitor and Cys LT1 receptor antagonists, are found useful in asthma therapy. LAs are of main use in young infants and toddler with recurrent wheezing, children with moderate to severe chronic asthma on steroid therapy and in allergic rhinitis. In chronic asthma they are required to be used for prolonged periods with other anti-asthma agents. Except for Montelukast and Zafirlukast, which can be used in children above two and six years of age respectively, the paediatric use of other agents is yet to be established. However, these agents are essentially safe. The cost of LAs is reasonably high. At present, with available evidence, these drugs are considered promising in management of asthma in children. However, there is need to do more long term clinical trials for ascertaining their effectivity in different types of asthma to compare their effects with long acting B2 agnoists and chromones, so as to optimally explore their utility.

Treatment options for the management of exercise-induced asthma and bronchoconstriction

Treatment for exercise-induced bronchospasm and exercise-induced asthma includes both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options. Pharmacologic agents that have been proven to be effective for treating these conditions include short- and long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonists, mast cell-stabilizing agents, anticholinergics, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). When selecting the most appropriate medication, factors to consider include the effectiveness of each, the duration of action, frequency of administration, potential side effects, and tolerance level. Long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonists should not be used without ICS. Nonpharmacologic treatments include physical conditioning, incorporating a warm-up before and a cool-down period after exercise, performing nasal breathing, avoiding cold weather or environmental allergens, using a face mask or other aid to warm and humidify inhaled air, and modifying dietary intake. The data to support nonpharmacologic treatments are limited; however, they are routinely recommended because of the low risk associated with their use. This article highlights the advantages and limitations of each treatment option.

Recent advances in pediatric asthma treatment

Although wheezing illness is at its most prevalent in infancy and early childhood, its self-limiting nature in the majority poses considerable challenges in offering a long-term prognosis and in initiating long-term prophylaxis. Many of the established treatments in adults have not been adequately assessed in children. Evidence is also emerging for a number of different wheezing syndromes, several of which do not to respond well to currently available medicines. Much research interest is being directed to underlying changes within the airway that appear to be independent of allergic mechanisms and that may lead to novel therapeutic approaches. The aim of this review is to restate and update current best-practice based on evidence, to encourage effective and safe use of asthma medication in children and to point to areas of ongoing research that are likely to influence management decisions in the near future.

Use and safety of long-acting β2-agonists for pediatric asthma

Asthma guidelines recommend the use of long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) as the preferred add-on therapy for adults and children over 5 years of age when asthma is inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids alone. It has been suggested that LABA use may be associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality; however, this view is controversial since study findings have been inconsistent. While the safety profile of LABA monotherapy has been questioned, the value of concomitant inhaled corticosteroids to eliminate possible risks remains unproven. There is a paucity of efficacy and safety data for LABA use in children, and existing evidence is not sufficiently convincing to demonstrate a clear position for LABAs in the management of childhood asthma. The main aims of this article are to place LABAs in context in the management of childhood asthma and evaluate the current evidence for safety and efficacy.

Optimizing maintenance therapy in pediatric asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are different phenotypes of asthma, with phenotype-specific differences in medication response observed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tobacco smoke exposure reduces corticosteroid responsiveness. Treatment for tobacco smoke-triggered asthma must start with treatment of tobacco dependence. Obesity-associated asthma responds to weight loss and treatment of comorbidities. Immunotherapy and omalizumab are specific therapies for atopic asthma, though its use is limited by expense, inconvenience, need for injections, and toxicities. Leukotriene modifier response is more prominent in viral-triggered asthma. Research on intermittent escalation of controller therapy for asthma shows best results when escalation is substantial and early. Inhaled corticosteroid medications in low-to-moderate doses remain the most important maintenance medication for a broad variety of asthma phenotypes, reducing both impairment and risk. When impairment is not fully controlled by an inhaled corticosteroid, combination with a long-acting beta-agonist, leukotriene modifier, or theophylline can be effective. Inhaled corticosteroid use in children does not appear to influence airway caliber or asthma severity after the medication is stopped.

SUMMARY

Optimizing maintenance therapy for asthma is not one size fits all. It is important to assess the asthma phenotype in addition to the symptom pattern, in determining optimal maintenance therapy.

Childhood evaluation of salmeterol tolerance--a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Long acting beta(2)-agonists (LABA) are widely used in children with asthma. Data from adults suggest that there is tachyphylaxis particularly to the bronchoprotective effects of LABA. There are no data in children. To determine whether LABA are subject to tachyphylaxis in school-aged children. Children were eligible for participation if they remained symptomatic on 400 microg of beclometasone dipropionate equivalent/day. Participants undertook a 4-wk run in period with open-label fluticasone 100 microg BD via Diskus. Children were then randomized to receive fluticasone 100 microg BD or salmeterol/fluticasone 50/100 microg BD via Diskus in a double-blind manner. Children underwent spirometry, cold air challenge and salbutamol reversibility testing at baseline, 4 and 8 wk. 37/42 children completed the study. There were significant improvements in basal FEV1 (% predicted) in the salmeterol/fluticasone group (n = 21) (+6.4% (95% CI: 2.4-10.5) p = 0.0033) but not in the fluticasone group (n = 16) [+1.2 (95% CI: -3.4 to 5.8) p = 0.5900]. There was a non-significant reduction in fall in FEV1 provoked by cold air in both groups. There was a significant lessening in the acute salbutamol response after 8 wk in the salmeterol/fluticasone group [-11.4% (95% CI: -17.6 to -5.2) p = 0.0010] but not in the fluticasone group [-1.6% (95% CI: -9.8 to 6.6) p = 0.6827]. Salmeterol/fluticasone therapy significantly improves basal FEV(1) in asthmatic children however, there is negligible additional bronchoprotection by week 4 of treatment and there is significant attenuation of salbutamol responsiveness when compared with fluticasone alone. Some of this reduction in salbutamol response may relate to the concurrent improvements in baseline lung function.

Retrospective claims study of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol fixed-dose combination use as initial asthma controller therapy in children despite guideline recommendations

BACKGROUND

According to current asthma treatment guidelines, single-entity inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) should be used as initial controller therapy in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) can be added to therapy for those patients whose asthma is not well controlled with a single-entity ICS.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to examine whether the claims history for children in a US insured population indicate proper fluticasone propionate/ salmeterol (FPS) fixed-dose combination use in accordance with recommended asthma guidelines and a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory and black box warning regarding LABA use. A comparison of study-drug charges was also conducted.

METHODS

Data from a US commercial insurance database were used in this retrospective study to evaluate pharmacy and medical claims for children between October 2004 and September 2006 (ie, the index period). An index date corresponding to the date of the first FPS claim was assigned to each patient. Eligible patients were aged 4 to 11 years and had >/=1 pharmacy claim for FPS during the index period. Those patients receiving 1 FPS prescription dose strength on the index date who were continuously enrolled for benefits during the preindex period (ie, the 365 days before the index date) were included in the study. Disease severity was assigned based on asthma-related pharmacy (frequency and/or incidence of oral corticosteroid, LABA, montelukast, and >365 doses of a short-acting beta(2)-agonist) and medical (asthma-related urgent care clinic or emergency department visits or hospitalizations) claim histories during the preindex period.

RESULTS

A total of 13,306 patients between the ages of 4 and 11 years on the index date were included in the study; their mean (SD) age was 8.9 (1.9) years. The majority of the patients were male (60.7%). Of the total FPS claims, 55.2% were for patients with no evidence of pharmacy or medical claims in the 365 days before the first FPS claim that would warrant ICS/LABA combination therapy according to asthma treatment guidelines. There were no large changes in preindex ICS claims over the course of the study in response to an FDA-issued advisory and black box warning regarding the use of LABAs. Median drug charges for single-entity ICS use were $98 compared with $168 for FPS therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS/LABA combination treatment was used as initial therapy in 55.2% of children with mild to moderate asthma in this claims database population, contrary to the recommendations of current asthma treatment guidelines. The FDA advisory and black box warning for LABA use had little observed impact on the number of single-entity ICS claims.

Effect of fish oil-derived omega-3 polyunsaturated Fatty Acid supplementation on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and immune function in athletes

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a condition in which vigorous physical activity triggers acute airway obstruction in asthmatic and nonasthmatic individuals with hyperresponsive airways. Studies have shown that inflammatory mediators and contraction of airway smooth muscle are central components in the pathogenesis of EIB, and it has long been recognized that leukotrienes and prostaglandins play an important role in the EIB response. Clinical responses to current therapy, such as leukotriene modifiers and corticosteroids are heterogeneous, and even with optimal treatment there is a substantial burden of unaddressed disease. While daily medications such as leukotriene modifiers provide only modest protection against symptoms, prolonged use of several medications can result in reduced effectiveness or tachyphylaxis. Although the treatment of EIB almost exclusively involves pharmacotherapy, there is now convincing evidence that dietary modification has the potential to reduce the severity of this condition. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in fish oils, compete with arachidonic acid as substrates for the formation of proinflammatory mediators, such as leukotrienes, prostaglandins, and cytokines. Studies have shown that 3 weeks of fish oil supplementation, rich in EPA and DHA, reduces exercise-induced airway narrowing, airway inflammation, and bronchodilator use in elite athletes and asthmatic individuals with EIB. Based on the evidence to date, fish oil supplementation may represent a potentially beneficial treatment intervention for athletes and asthmatic individuals with EIB. From this, it follows that physicians should pay more attention to what their asthma/EIB patients eat, and incorporate dietary assessment and nutritional counseling in their everyday practice.

KEYWORDS

omega-3; polyunsaturated fatty acid; fish oil; exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

State of the evidence on acute asthma management in children: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to evaluate clinical, methodologic, and reporting aspects of systematic reviews on the management of acute asthma in children.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review of systematic reviews on acute asthma management in children. We identified eligible reviews by searching the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Medline, and Embase 1990 to March 2006. Data were extracted on clinical issues, methodologic characteristics, and results of the reviews. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire and with additional questions on heterogeneity. Separate reporting on children in mixed adult-pediatric population reviews was assessed. Methodologic quality of systematic reviews published in peer-reviewed journals was compared with Cochrane reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 23 systematic reviews were included: 14 were published in the Cochrane Library, and 9 were published in peer-reviewed journals. Eight reviews included children only, and 15 were mixed-population reviews. The majority of reviews defined the study population as having "acute asthma" without a more precise definition, and 16 different health outcomes were reported. The overall quality according to the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire was good, with Cochrane reviews showing minimal flaws and journal reviews showing minor flaws (median scores: 7 vs 5). Results on children were reported separately in 8 of 15 mixed-population reviews. Clinical heterogeneity was explored in only 2 of 23 reviews, and the methods used to identify and address heterogeneity were diverse.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodologic quality of both the Cochrane and journal reviews on the management of acute asthma in children seems good, with Cochrane reviews being more rigorous. However, their usefulness for clinical practice is hampered by a lack of clear definitions of included populations, clinically important health outcomes, and separate reporting on children in mixed reviews. A major threat to these reviews' validity is the insufficient identification and handling of heterogeneity.

Tolerability profiles of leukotriene receptor antagonists and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for treatment of asthma: a review

Inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are widely used for treatment of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy, whereas long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists are indicated as add-on therapy in patients not adequately controlled with corticosteroids alone. A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of combinations of these drugs in asthma, but several issues concerning the safety of these treatments are highly debated. This review provides a critical appraisal of the tolerability profiles of long-acting beta2-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma: pharmacologic determinants of safety and efficacy and other clinical considerations

The role of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the treatment of childhood asthma has been well established. An ideal corticosteroid should demonstrate high pulmonary deposition and residency time, in addition to a low systemic bioavailability and rapid systemic clearance. The lung depositions of the ICS have been compared, with beclomethasone (beclometasone)-hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and ciclesonide showing the highest lung deposition. Lung deposition is influenced by not only the inhalation device and type of propellant (HFA or chlorofluorocarbon), but also by whether the aerosol is a solution or suspension, and the particle size of the respirable fraction. Pulmonary residency time increases when budesonide and des-ciclesonide undergo reversible fatty acid esterification. The bioavailability of the drug depends on the oral bioavailable fraction and the amount absorbed directly from the pulmonary vasculature. The clearance rate of des-ciclesonide is very high (228 L/h), increasing its safety profile by utilizing extra-hepatic clearance mechanisms. Both des-ciclesonide and mometasone have a high protein binding fraction (98-99%). The volume of distribution (Vd) is proportional to the lipophilicity of the drug, with the Vd of fluticasone being 332L compared with 183L for budesonide. Increasing the Vd will also increase the elimination half-life of a drug. The pharmacodynamics of ICS depend on both the receptor binding affinity and the dose-response curve. Among the ICS, fluticasone and mometasone have the highest receptor binding affinity (1800 and 2200, respectively), followed by budesonide at 935 (relative to dexamethasone = 100). Compared with other nonsteroid asthma medications (long-acting beta-agonists, theophylline, and montelukast) ICS have proven superiority in improving lung function, symptom-free days, and inflammatory markers. One study suggests that early intervention with ICS reduces the loss in lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) over 3 years. Whether airway remodeling is reduced or prevented in the long term is unknown. Potential adverse drug effects of ICS include adrenal and growth suppression. While in low-to-medium doses ICS have shown little suppression of the adrenal pituitary axis, in high doses the potential for significant adrenal suppression and adrenal crisis exists. Several longitudinal studies evaluating the effect of ICS on growth have shown a small decrement in growth velocity (approximate 1-2 cm) during the first year of treatment. However, when investigators followed children treated with budesonide for up to 10 years, no change in target adult height was noted. In conclusion, the development of optimal delivery devices for young children, as well as optimizing favorable pharmacokinetic properties of ICS should be priorities for future childhood asthma management.

Efficacy and safety of a new pressurised metered-dose inhaler formulation of budesonide/formoterol in children with asthma: a superiority and therapeutic equivalence study

AIM

This paediatric asthma study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide/formoterol versus budesonide pMDI and budesonide/formoterol dry-powder inhaler (DPI).

METHODS

The study was a 12-week, multinational, double-blind trial involving children (aged 6-11 years) with symptomatic asthma on inhaled corticosteroids (375-1000 microg/day), with a history of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =50% of predicted. Patients were randomised (two inhalations twice daily) to budesonide pMDI 100 microg, budesonide/formoterol DPI 80/4.5 microg or budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in morning PEF.

RESULTS

Overall, 622 patients were randomised. Increases in morning PEF with budesonide/formoterol pMDI and budesonide/formoterol DPI were therapeutically equivalent (29.5 versus 30.2l/min, respectively; 95% confidence interval: -6.0 to 4.6; P=0.78, also confirmed by per-protocol analysis). Improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints with both budesonide/formoterol formulations were not significantly different. Significantly greater improvement was achieved with budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI for morning PEF (+9.6l/min; P<0.001) and other lung function parameters. The safety profile of budesonide/formoterol pMDI was favourable and similar to that of budesonide/formoterol DPI and budesonide pMDI.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide/formoterol, administered via the therapeutically equivalent hydrofluoroalkane pMDI or DPI, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for children with asthma.

Beta2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma

Beta2-agonists taken immediately before exercise provide significant protection against exercise- induced asthma (EIA) in most patients. However, when they are taken daily, there are some negative aspects regarding severity, control, and recovery from EIA. First, there is a significant minority (15-20%) of asthmatics whose EIA is not prevented by beta2-agonists, even when inhaled corticosteroids are used concomitantly. Second, with daily use, there is a decline in duration of the protective effect of long-acting beta2-agonists. Third, if breakthrough EIA occurs, recovery of lung function is slower in response to a beta2-agonist, and additional doses are often required to achieve pre-exercise values. If a person who takes a beta2-agonist daily experiences problems with exercise, then the physician should consider changing the treatment regimen to achieve better control of EIA. These problems likely result from desensitization of the beta2-receptor on the mast cell, which enhances mediator release, and on the bronchial smooth muscle, which enhances the bronchoconstrictor response and delays recovery from EIA. These effects are reversed within 72 h after cessation of a beta2-agonists. The important clinical question is: Are we actually compromising the beneficial effects of beta2-agonists on the prevention and recovery from EIA by prescribing them daily? Patients with EIA need to ensure that their doses of inhaled corticosteroid or other anti-inflammatory therapy are optimized so that, if necessary, a beta2-agonist can be used intermittently as prophylactic medication with greater confidence in the outcome.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS). In this updated review we have included studies in which patients were either not on ICS as a group, or in which some patients, but not all, were on ICS to complement previous systematic reviews of studies where LABA was given in patients uniformly receiving ICS. We have focussed particularly on serious adverse events, given previous concerns about potential risks, especially of death, from regular beta-2 agonist use.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of LABA compared with placebo, in mixed populations in which only some were taking ICS and in populations not using ICS therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2005. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least four weeks duration, comparing a LABA given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma. Selection criteria to this updated review have been altered to accommodate recently published Cochrane reviews on combination and addition of LABA to ICS therapy. Studies in which all individuals were uniformly taking ICS were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies (representing 68 experimental comparisons) randomising 42,333 participants met the inclusion criteria. Salmeterol was used as long-acting agent in 50 studies and formoterol fumarate in 17. The treatment period was four to nine weeks in 29 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 38 studies. Twenty-four studies did not permit the use of ICS, and forty permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones (in three studies this was unclear). In these studies between 22% and 92% were taking ICS, with a median of 62%. There were significant advantages to LABA treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF and FEV1. They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. This was true whether patients were taking LABA in combination with ICS or not. Findings from SMART (a recently published surveillance study) indicated significant increases in asthma related deaths, respiratory related deaths and combined asthma related deaths and life threatening experiences. The absolute increase in asthma-related mortality was consistent with an increase of around one per 1250 patients treated with LABA for six months, but the confidence intervals are wide (from 700 to 10,000). Post-hoc exploratory subgroups suggested that African-Americans and those not on inhaled corticosteroids were at particular risk for the primary end-point of death or life-threatening asthma event. There was also a suggestion of an increase in exacerbation rate in children. Pharmacologically predicted side effects such as headache, throat irritation, tremor and nervousness were more frequent with LABA treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LABA are effective in the control of chronic asthma in the "real-life" subject groups included. However there are potential safety issues which call into question the safety of LABA, particularly in those asthmatics who are not taking ICS, and it is not clear why African-Americans were found to have significant differences in comparison to Caucasians for combined respiratory-related death and life threatening experiences, but not for asthma-related death.

Duration of action of the salmeterol/fluticasone combination inhaler administered in the evening: a randomized controlled trial in childhood asthma

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

To investigate the duration of bronchodilator action of a salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) inhaler when administered in the evening to children with asthma.

METHODOLOGY

DESIGN

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.

SETTING

Hospital inpatient.

SUBJECTS

Fourteen children aged between 4 and 11 years with mild to moderate asthma (FEV(1) > 60% predicted) who exhibited a 15% increase in FEV(1) with bronchodilator.

INTERVENTIONS

SUBJECTS inhaled, in random order, either SFC (100/50 microg) or placebo, via accuhaler, at 20.00 hours on two separate occasions with at least 3 days between study days.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Lung function measurements including FEV(1), PEF, specific airways conductance (sGaw) and maximum expiratory flow at 25-75% of vital capacity were measured at baseline, 2, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h.

RESULTS

For all lung function parameters SFC resulted in significantly greater bronchodilation than placebo for at least 20 h after inhalation. At 24 h, the increase in FEV(1) and PEF compared with placebo was 0.08 L (95% confidence interval: -0.18 to 0.02, P = 0.16) and 27 L/min (95% confidence interval: -47 to -6, P = 0.004), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The single administration of SFC via an accuhaler in the evening resulted in significant bronchodilation for at least 20 h in children with asthma.

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance plus reliever therapy: a new strategy in pediatric asthma

OBJECTIVES

A fixed combination of long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABA) plus inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has never been proven to reduce asthma exacerbations vs ICS alone in children. This 12-month, double-blind, randomized study in 341 children (age range, 4 to 11 years) with asthma uncontrolled on ICS investigated whether a novel regimen using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort maintenance and relief therapy [SMART]) [Symbicort; AstraZeneca R&D, Lund, Sweden] could reduce exacerbations.

METHODS

Patients received SMART (budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg qd maintenance plus additional inhalations for symptom relief), budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg qd for maintenance (fixed combination), or higher-dose budesonide 320 microg qd (fixed-dose budesonide). Blinded as-needed medication (terbutaline 0.4 microg) was provided in both fixed-dose groups.

RESULTS

SMART prolonged the time to first exacerbation vs fixed-dose budesonide (p = 0.02) and fixed-dose combination (p < 0.001). Rates of exacerbation requiring medical intervention were reduced by 70 to 79% with SMART vs fixed-dose budesonide and fixed-dose combination (0.08/patient vs 0.28/patient and 0.40/patient, respectively; both p < 0.001). Mild exacerbation days and awakenings were significantly lower with SMART; yearly growth improved by 1.0 cm vs fixed-dose budesonide (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The SMART regimen using budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and as-needed symptom relief reduces the exacerbation rate compared with both fixed-dose combination and higher fixed-dose ICS alone in children with asthma.

Effect of formoterol fumarate treatment on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common, particularly in children.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the protective effect of single doses of formoterol fumarate via Aerolizer with placebo and albuterol in children with EIB.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 23 children (aged 4-11 years) received formoterol, 12 or 24 microg; albuterol, 180 microg; or placebo at 4 separate visits. Protection against EIB was evaluated as the maximum percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from the preexercise value after exercise challenge tests (6-minute treadmill) conducted 15 minutes and 4, 8, and 12 hours after administration of the dose.

RESULTS

The maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 after the 4-hour exercise test (primary efficacy variable) was significantly less for formoterol, 12 and 24 microg, vs placebo (P < .001 for both) or albuterol (P = .016 and .010, respectively); albuterol was not significantly different from placebo. Formoterol, 12 and 24 microg, differed from placebo at 8 hours (P = .002 and .001, respectively), with a smaller difference between albuterol and placebo (P = .045). Rescue medication use and a high dropout rate may have biased treatment differences at later time points. Protection against EIB (<20% maximum decrease in FEV1) across all time points was observed for 17 (77%) of 22 and 17 (74%) of 23 children with formoterol, 12 and 24 microg, respectively, compared with 8 (35%) of 23 with albuterol and 6 (27%) of 22 with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Single doses of formoterol, 12 or 24 microg, are effective in protecting against EIB in children, affording a statistically significantly greater protective effect than placebo or albuterol.

Arginine-16 beta2 adrenoceptor genotype predisposes to exacerbations in young asthmatics taking regular salmeterol

BACKGROUND

The homozygous presence of the arginine-16 variant of the beta(2) adrenoceptor gene ADRB2 reverses the benefits from the regular use of short acting beta(2) agonists in asthmatic adults compared with the homozygous glycine-16 genotype. We studied the effect of this polymorphic variation on asthma exacerbations in children and young adults and its relation to long acting beta(2) agonists.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using electronic records, direct interviews, and genotype determination of position 16 and 27 of the ADRB2 gene in DNA from mouthwash samples of 546 children and young asthmatics attending paediatric and young adult asthma clinics in Tayside, Scotland during 2004-5. The primary outcome measure was asthma exacerbations over the previous 6 months.

RESULTS

There was an increased hazard of asthma exacerbations across all treatment steps of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) asthma guidelines when the homozygous genotypes Arg/Arg and Gly/Gly were compared (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.53, p = 0.010), particularly in patients treated with salmeterol (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.19 to 9.40, p = 0.022). The Glu27Gln polymorphism had no significant effect on asthma exacerbations in any treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

The arginine-16 genotype of ADRB2 predisposes to exacerbations in asthmatic children and young adults, particularly in those exposed to regular salmeterol. This may be explained by genotype selective salmeterol induced downregulation and impaired receptor coupling, and associated subsensitivity of the response.

[Long-acting beta-2 agonists in pediatric asthma therapy--friend or foe]

Recent publications suggest that long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs) increase the risk for death in asthma. The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a relevant alert in 2005. In the currently valid Austrian consensus guidelines for drug therapy of bronchial asthma in children and adolescents, LABAs are only recommended as add-on therapy in those patients whose asthma is not sufficiently controlled by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone. LABAs have no established role in earlier steps of the therapeutic algorithm; consequently, the prescription of ICS-LABA combinations for initial treatment of paediatric asthma is not supported by these consensus treatment guidelines.

The use of inhaled formoterol in the treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol when used to relieve symptoms of asthma and prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed for articles published between 1997 and 2005 with the keywords formoterol, asthma, and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist, with cross-referencing to identify peer-reviewed journal articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Published articles on the clinical use of formoterol for asthma or EIB were included as well as articles detailing the pharmacologic properties of the drug. To present a thorough review of the literature, published studies based on patient number, study design, or other measures of study quality were not excluded.

RESULTS

Formoterol is the only long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist that combines a rapid onset of action (within 3 minutes) with a long duration of effect (approximately 12 hours). Clinically, as recommended by asthma treatment guidelines, formoterol in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is a preferred treatment for moderate to severe persistent asthma. Significant clinical data support the use of formoterol in combination with ICSs for the treatment of asthma, with studies demonstrating improved pulmonary function and symptom scores and decreased need for maintenance ICSs and short-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (SABAs) as relief medication. Recent studies also demonstrate that use of formoterol as needed as relief medication is associated with a prolonged time to exacerbation, improved pulmonary function, and decreased asthma symptoms. When used as monotherapy, formoterol provides protection against EIB. Clinical data also demonstrate that formoterol is safe and well tolerated even in high doses, with an adverse event profile similar to that of SABAs.

CONCLUSION

Overall, formoterol is safe and effective as adjunct controller therapy for moderate and severe persistent asthma and as monotherapy for EIB.

Understanding the pathophysiology of severe asthma to generate new therapeutic opportunities

Although asthma is defined in terms of reversibility of airflow obstruction, as the disease becomes more severe and chronic, it adopts different characteristics, including a degree of fixed airflow obstruction and corticosteroid refractoriness. Underlying these phenotypes is evidence of airway wall remodeling, which should be distinguished from the increase in smooth muscle linked to airways hyperresponsiveness. Aberrant epithelial-mesenchymal communication leads to a chronic wound scenario, which is characterized by activation of the epithelial-mesenchymal trophic unit, epithelial damage, the laying down of new matrix, and greater involvement of neutrophils in the inflammatory response. In allergic asthmatic patients who remain symptomatic despite high-dose corticosteroid therapy, blockade of IgE with omalizumab confers appreciable clinical benefit. Chronic severe asthma is also accompanied by a marked increase in TNF-alpha production that might contribute to corticosteroid refractoriness. Based on this, TNF blockade with the soluble fusion protein entanercept produces improvement in asthma symptoms, lung function, and quality of life paralleled by a marked reduction in airways hyperresponsiveness. Identification of novel susceptibility genes, such as a disintegrin and metalloprotease 33 (ADAM33), will provide further targets against which to direct novel therapies for asthma, especially at the more severe end of the disease spectrum.

Acute relief of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by inhaled formoterol in children with persistent asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the acute bronchodilatory effect of the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol against the short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) terbutaline during exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with asthma.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the immediate effect of formoterol, 9 microg, vs terbutaline, 0.5 mg, and placebo administered as dry powder at different study days. Exercise challenge test was used as a model of acute bronchoconstriction.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four 7- to 15-year-old children with persistent asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

The children performed standardized treadmill exercise tests, breathing dry air, with a submaximal workload. Study medication was administered 5 min after exercise if FEV1 dropped > or = 15% within 5 min after exercise. FEV1 and forced expiratory flows were measured repeatedly until 60 min after dose.

RESULTS

Formoterol and terbutaline offered a significant acute bronchodilatory effect from 3 min after dose compared with placebo (p < 0.001). There was no difference between formoterol and terbutaline in FEV1 5 min after dose (p = 0.15), with a mean increase from each predrug baseline of 62% of the maximum increase for both. Median times to recovery within 5% of baseline FEV1 were 5.0 min and 7.4 min for formoterol and terbutaline, respectively (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

Single-dose formoterol, 9 microg, via dry powder inhaler provided an acute bronchodilatory effect similar to terbutaline during EIB in schoolchildren with persistent asthma. Formoterol is at least as effective as SABA and may be considered an alternative in the treatment of acute bronchoconstriction in school children.

Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids in asthma- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Despite progress that has been made in the treatment of asthma, the prevalence and burden of this disease has continued to increase. While pharmacological treatment of asthma is usually highly effective, medications may have significant side effects or exhibit tachyphylaxis. Alternative therapies for treatment that reduce the dose requirements of pharmacological interventions would be beneficial, and could potentially reduce the public health burden of this disease. Ecological and temporal data suggest that dietary factors may have a role in recent increases in the prevalence of asthma. A possible contributing factor to the increased incidence of asthma in Western societies may be the consumption of a proinflammatory diet. In the typical Western diet, 20- to 25-fold more omega (n)-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than n-3 PUFA are consumed, which promotes the release of proinflammatory arachidonic acid metabolites (leukotrienes and prostanoids). This review will analyze the evidence for the health effects of n-3 PUFA in asthma- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). While clinical data evaluating the effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in asthma has been equivocal, it has recently been shown that fish oil supplementation, rich in n-3 PUFA, reduces airway narrowing, medication use, and proinflammatory mediator generation in nonatopic elite athletes with EIB. These findings are provocative and suggest that dietary fish oil supplementation may be a viable treatment modality and/or adjunct therapy in asthma and EIB.

Advances in the management of pediatric asthma: a review of recent FDA drug approvals and label updates

Children have the highest prevalence of asthma of any age group. In the United States during 2001, there were 12.6 million physician and hospital outpatient visits for asthma treatment, of which almost 5 million involved children 18 years and younger. Therapeutic advances in pediatric asthma could improve patient outcomes and potentially reduce the burden on health care systems. Efforts to obtain efficacy and safety data in pediatric populations and develop pediatric formulations of asthma treatments have been encouraged by the FDA and clinicians. This article reviews the newest additions to asthma therapies approved for use in children, including an inhaled corticosteroid, some long-acting beta2-agonists, some leukotriene-receptor blockers, and a single-isomer, short-acting beta2-agonist.

The challenge of mild persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the current data and treatment options for mild persistent asthma.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed for relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

The expert opinion of the author was used to select studies for inclusion in this review.

RESULTS

Current data suggest that asthma severity is determined early in life and that disease progression may not occur outside early childhood. Furthermore, no therapy has been demonstrated to clearly prevent or reverse structural airway changes in patients with persistent asthma. Thus, the primary goal of asthma therapy is to prevent disease exacerbations rather than to halt disease progress, at least in patients past early childhood. Published reports of severe exacerbations in patients with reported mild asthma may actually reflect inclusion of patients with more severe forms of the disease who were inappropriately classified in terms of asthma severity.

CONCLUSION

Unlike the case for moderate and severe asthma, where regular therapy with inhaled corticosteroids is clearly the treatment of choice, clear guidelines for treating patients with mild persistent asthma have not been established. Patients with mild disease without severe exacerbations may require only the minimum therapy necessary for disease control.

Asthma treatment in the 21st century: what's next?

Asthma treatment is evolving as we enter the 21st century. This review focuses on several different areas of asthma treatment now in evolution. These include: (1) the proper role of various asthma controllers--either already approved or under investigation--besides inhaled corticosteriods in asthma therapy; (2) the potential role for immune and cytokine modulation for asthma therapy; (3) the potential role for pharmacogenetics in asthma therapy; and (4) whether single-inhaler therapy with a combination of an inhaled corticosteriod and a long-acted beta-agonist could be used for both maintenance and rescue in patients with asthma.

Omega-3 Fatty acids and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma

Despite the progress that has been made in the treatment of asthma, the prevalence and burden of this disease has continued to increase. Exercise is a powerful trigger of asthma symptoms and reversible airflow obstruction and may result in the avoidance of physical activity by patients with asthma, resulting in detrimental consequences to their health. Approximately 90% of patients with asthma are hyperresponsive to exercise and experience exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). While pharmacologic treatment of asthma is usually highly effective, medications often have significant side-effects or exhibit tachyphylaxis. Alternative therapies for treatment (complementary medicine) that reduce the dose requirements of pharmacologic interventions would be beneficial, and could potentially reduce the public health burden of this disease. There is accumulating evidence that dietary modification has potential to influence the severity of asthma and reduce the prevalence and incidence of this condition. A possible contributing factor to the increased incidence of asthma in Western societies may be the consumption of a proinflammatory diet. In the typical Western diet, 20- to 25-fold more omega- 6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than omega-3 PUFA are consumed, which causes the release of proinflammatory arachidonic acid metabolites (leukotrienes and prostanoids). This review analyzes the existing literature on omega-3 PUFA supplementation as a potential modifier of airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma and includes studies concerning the efficacy of omega-3 PUFA supplementation in EIB. While clinical data evaluating the effect of omega-3 PUFA supplementation in asthma has been equivocal, it has recently been shown that pharmaceutical-grade fish oil (omega-3 PUFA) supplementation reduces airway hyperresponsiveness after exercise, medication use, and proinflammatory mediator generation in nonatopic elite athletes with EIB. These findings are provocative and suggest that dietary omega-3 PUFA supplementation may be a viable treatment modality and/or adjunct therapy in airway hyperresponsiveness. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and understand their mechanism of action.

Trends in asthma prevalence, hospitalization risk, and inhaled corticosteroid use among alaska native and nonnative medicaid recipients younger than 20 years

BACKGROUND

Few trend data on asthma prevalence exist for U.S. indigenous populations, and none exist for Alaska Natives.

OBJECTIVE

To document the epidemiologic features of asthma in Alaska Natives and nonnatives stratified by urban (Anchorage) and rural (non-Anchorage) residence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of Alaskans younger than 20 years enrolled in Medicaid during 1999 to 2002. Asthma was defined as a claim for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes 493.0x to 493.9x plus asthma-associated medication during the same calendar year.

RESULTS

Among 117,080 Medicaid enrollees, the 4-year asthma prevalence was 3.1% and was 40% to 90% greater for urban residents regardless of race. Yearly prevalence increased from 1.0% to 2.2% (P < .001), with increases in all subgroups. Of 4 predominantly Alaska Native census areas, the area with resident pediatricians and previous participation in asthma research had a 4-year asthma prevalence 5- to 11-fold higher than the other areas. Among persons with asthma, yearly hospitalization risk decreased (from 9.3% to 6.8%; P = .02) concurrent with an increase in the yearly use of inhaled corticosteroids (from 50% to 64%; P < .001). Urban Alaska Natives had the greatest decrease in hospitalization risk and the greatest increase in inhaled corticosteroid use.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively dramatic demographic differences and temporal trends in asthma prevalence occurred in the absence of known differences or changes in risk factor prevalences. This suggests a role for differences in the use of asthma as a diagnosis for respiratory illness. Failure to diagnose and thus treat asthma may affect outcomes because decreases in hospitalization risk were temporally associated with increases in inhaled corticosteroid use.

Long-acting beta2-agonists: comparative pharmacology and clinical outcomes

Salmeterol and formoterol are both long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists). They both provide excellent bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effects in patients with asthma but their are some differences between these two long-acting beta(2)-agonists in vitro and in vivo. Formoterol has a greater potency and intrinsic activity than salmeterol, which can become especially apparent at higher doses than that clinically recommended, and in contracted bronchi. Long-term use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists can induce tolerance, which can be partially reversed with corticosteroids. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have some anti-inflammatory effects in vitro, but data in vivo are less convincing. Compared with doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids improves symptom control in patients with asthma and reduces both the exacerbation rate of asthma and hospital admission rate. No enhanced airway responsiveness or loss of perception of dyspnea has been observed with the use of inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists. Monotherapy with long-acting beta(2)-agonists is not recommended.

Single-dose agents in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma: a descriptive review

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) refers to the transient narrowing of the airways that occurs after vigorous exercise in 50-60% of patients with asthma. The need to condition the air inspired during exercise causes water to be lost from the airway surface, and this is thought to cause the release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins) from mast cells. EIA is associated with airway inflammation and its severity is markedly reduced following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Drugs that inhibit the release of mediators and drugs that inhibit their contractile effects are the most successful in inhibiting EIA. Single doses of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, given as aerosols immediately before exercise, are very effective in the majority of patients with asthma, providing about 80% protection for up to 2 hours. Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) given in single doses can be effective for up to 12 hours when used intermittently, but tolerance to the protective effect occurs if they are taken daily. Drugs such as cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglicate) and nedocromil given as aerosols are less effective than beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), providing 50-60% protection for only 1-2 hours, but they have some advantages. They do not induce tolerance, the aerosol dosage can be easily titrated for the individual, and the protective effect is immediate. Because they cause no significant adverse effects, multiple doses can be used in a day. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast and zafirlukast, are also used for the prevention of EIA and provide 50-60% protection for up to 24 hours when given as tablets. Tolerance to the protective effect does not develop with regular use. If breakthrough EIA occurs, a beta(2)-agonist can be used effectively for rescue medication. For those patients with more persistent symptoms, the use of a LABA in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid has raised a number of issues with respect to the choice of prophylactic treatment for EIA. The most important issue is the development of tolerance to the protective effect of a LABA such that extra treatment may be needed in the middle of a treatment period. Recommending extra doses of a beta(2)-agonist to control EIA is not advisable on the basis that multiple doses can enhance the severity of EIA, delay spontaneous recovery from bronchoconstriction, and enhance responses to other contractile stimuli. It is time to take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the different drugs available to prevent EIA and to recognize that there are some myths related to their use in EIA.

[Asthma treatment in childhood: from guidelines to practice]

Aims for the management of asthma in children are to optimize quality of life and to maintain normal lung functions. International guidelines recommend rapid-acting inhaled beta2-agonist as needed in children with intermittent asthma. Once asthma is persistent, mild, moderate or severe, daily long-term therapy with inhaled corticosteroids should be started. Association with long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist or leukotriene inhibitors are required in children not enough controlled with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Management of the asthmatic child should not be restricted to antiasthmatic drug prescription but should include patient and patient's family education as well as adequate health of life.

Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists and exercise-induced asthma: lessons to guide us in the future

The safety and efficacy of long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) taken intermittently for the prevention of exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in children is well established. However, the safety and efficacy of LABAs taken twice daily, either alone or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, for the prevention of EIA is not as clear because of issues of tolerance (defined as being less responsive to the influence of LABAs). There have been many observations on short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (SABAs) and EIA that should have alerted us to the potential for tolerance and desensitization to occur with LABAs. For example, we expected that the use of LABAs for EIA would overcome the problem of the short duration of protection of SABAs, and to some extent they have. The protective period of a LABA is two to three times longer in duration than that of a SABA. However, when a LABA is taken daily it is apparent that the duration of its protective effect is reduced and there is a risk of EIA occurring well within the 12-hour administration schedules. Furthermore, daily use of LABAs attenuates the bronchodilator effect of SABAs, an effect that is greater the more severe the bronchoconstriction. This 'tolerance' increases both the time and the amount of therapy that is needed to recover from bronchoconstriction, and thus, could potentially impact on the success of rescue therapy should severe EIA occur. The daily use of LABAs also increases the sensitivity of the bronchial smooth muscle to contractile agents. This increase in sensitivity is almost equivalent to the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids reduce sensitivity to the same contractile agents. The increased sensitivity to contractile agents may occur either by a reduction in the inhibitory effect of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists on release of mediators from mast cells or by a direct effect on the bronchial smooth muscle. These unwanted effects of LABAs are not necessarily reduced by concomitant treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. As the number of children being treated with LABAs increases, it is predicted that problems with breakthrough EIA will also increase. We need to know the percentage of children taking a LABA daily who are requiring either extra doses of a beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to prevent (or reverse) EIA or other provocative stimuli. If this percentage is significant then we may need to reconsider the position of LABAs in the treatment of children with asthma who regularly perform strenuous physical activity.