Abnormal allometric size of vital body organs among sudden infant death syndrome victims

Organ weights and length anthropometry measures at autopsy for sudden infant death syndrome cases and other infant deaths in the Chicago infant mortality study

Organ weights are a possible diagnostic or pathophysiological clue to distinguishing sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases from other infant deaths but suffer from major confounding. Using autopsy data from the Chicago Infant Mortality Study, a majority African-American case-control study of deceased infants under 1 year conducted 1993-96, we assessed differences in the weights of brain, thymus, kidneys, lungs, liver, spleen, total body, and four length anthropometry measures in SIDS-diagnosed infants compared to controls. Using exact and coarsened matching, we ran Bayesian linear models with these anthropometry outcomes and repeated the analyses substituting the corresponding fitted allometrically-scaled organ weight indices to account for body size. After detailed analysis and adjustment for potential confounders, we found that matched SIDS infants were generally bigger than controls, with higher mean brain, liver, spleen, thymus, lung, and total body weights, and higher mean head and chest circumference, crown-heel, crown-rump lengths. SIDS infants also had higher mean thymus, liver, spleen, lung and total body weight indices. The association with thymus weight was proportionately greater in magnitude than any other outcome measure and independent of body size. The results of these more detailed analyses are consistent with recent findings from other studies with differing racial compositions, and substantially confirm the primary organ sites for more detailed mechanistic research into the biological dysregulation contributing to underlying pathophysiology of SIDS.

The Science (or Nonscience) of Research Into Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

This Viewpoint paper presents a timely and constructive critique of mainstream SIDS research. It is concerning that twenty-first century medical science has not provided an answer to the tragic enigma of SIDS. The paper helps explain why this is so and illustrates possible shortcomings in the investigation of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome/Sudden Unexplained Infant Death (SIDS/SUID) by mainstream researchers. Mainstream findings are often based on questionable and dogmatic assumptions that return to founding notions such as the Triple Risk Hypothesis and the contention that the mechanisms underlying SIDS/SUID are heterogeneous in nature. The paper illustrates how the pathological findings in SIDS have been under-investigated (or ignored) and that key epidemiological risk factors have slipped from memory. This apparent amnesia has resulted in failure to use these established SIDS facts to substantiate the significance of various neuropathological, neurochemical, or other research findings. These unsupported findings and their derivative hypotheses are therefore ill-founded and lack scientific rigor.

CONCLUSION

The deficits of SIDS "science" revealed in this paper explain why the SIDS enigma has not yet been solved. To make progress in understanding SIDS, it is important that researchers, as scientists, uphold standards of research. Encouragement for new directions of research is offered.

Infection, Celestial Influences, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A New Paradigm

The etiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) still remains unclear. This situation would seem unprecedented for 21st-century medical science. This article explores scientific fields that have not been largely considered in investigating the etiology of SIDS so far. In this study, we examined previously ignored studies on heliobiology, celestial influences, and SIDS in the non-medical literature in an attempt to answer the following questions: is there a relationship between sunspot/solar activity and the occurrence of SIDS? Could there be alternative reasons for the decline in SIDS incidences in the 1990s that were originally attributed to the “Back-to-Sleep” campaign? We note that the decline coincided with the ~11-year cyclical diminution in sunspot numbers (SSNs). The SSN/SIDS relationship does not necessarily imply causality; however, it supports published data regarding sunspots, Schumann resonance, and geomagnetic effects. How solar energy could adversely influence a baby’s existence remains conjectural. Observations in this respect suggest pathways involving melatonin and/or infection/inflammation.

Increased thymus weight in sudden infant death syndrome compared to controls: The role of sub-clinical infections

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present investigation is to analyze thymus, brain, heart, liver, and kidney weights in SIDS victims compared to controls.

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic risk factors for SIDS (eg, male gender, genetic, obstetric, environmental, smoke exposure, nonbreastfeeding, etc.) are consistent with an infectious process underlying many of these deaths.

METHODS

Data from autopsy reports on 585 SIDS victims and comparison deaths (n = 294 control, n = 291 SIDS) were analyzed. Cases were obtained from Australia (n = 184 controls, n = 98 SIDS) and Russia (n = 122 controls, n = 181 SIDS). Log₁₀ transform of thymus and other organ weights was computed because variables were skewed. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of standardized log values were age-adjusted by multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). The standardized log₁₀ thymus residual adjusted for age, brain and liver weights was computed for the final analysis.

RESULTS

After controlling for age by MANCOVA, thymus, body, brain and liver weights were significantly higher among SIDS compared to non-SIDS victims. The largest difference as between covariate-adjusted log₁₀ non-SIDS thymus weight differed (mean = 1.423, 95% CI: 1.393-1.452) and log₁₀ non-SIDS thymus weight (mean = 1.269, 95% CI: 1.243-1.294) were significantly different (P < .0001). Heart weight was significantly lower in SIDS victims.

DISCUSSION

When adjusted for confounders (age, body, and organ weights), SIDS victims have a significantly heavier thymus and brain compared to non-SIDS controls who died of trauma. This finding supports previously published studies that link infection to SIDS deaths.

Brain weight in sudden unexpected death in infancy: experience from a large single-centre cohort

AIMS

Published reports of brain weight in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) are contradictory, although several have concluded that brain weight is increased in SIDS compared with controls or reference data. This is important as, if brain weight is significantly different, it may be of diagnostic use or provide insights into the aetiology of SIDS. The aim of this study was to use a large series of well-characterized sudden unexpected infant deaths from a single centre to provide definitive data regarding this issue.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 1100 infants who had died suddenly and undergone a comprehensive autopsy at Great Ormond Street Hospital between 1996 and 2011. They were split into two groups: those in whom death could be explained and those whose deaths remained unexplained despite full investigation (SIDS/unexplained sudden unexpected death in infancy).

RESULTS

There were 1100 cases of whom 573 (52%) were unexplained and 527 (48%) explained. Multiple regression analysis, which adjusted for sex, age and post-mortem interval, showed no difference in the ratio of brain weight : body weight between those infants dying of explained causes and those in whom no cause could be found. This finding remained true when restricting analysis to those with macroscopically normal brains.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of infants dying of both explained and unexplained causes, brain weight, once corrected for body weight, did not vary consistently with the cause of death. Brain weight cannot be used as a diagnostic indicator of the cause of death or to inform hypothetical models of the pathogenesis of SIDS.

A perspective on SIDS pathogenesis. the hypotheses: plausibility and evidence

Several theories of the underlying mechanisms of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) have been proposed. These theories have born relatively narrow beach-head research programs attracting generous research funding sustained for many years at expense to the public purse. This perspective endeavors to critically examine the evidence and bases of these theories and determine their plausibility; and questions whether or not a safe and reasoned hypothesis lies at their foundation. The Opinion sets specific criteria by asking the following questions: 1. Does the hypothesis take into account the key pathological findings in SIDS? 2. Is the hypothesis congruent with the key epidemiological risk factors? 3. Does it link 1 and 2? Falling short of any one of these answers, by inference, would imply insufficient grounds for a sustainable hypothesis. Some of the hypotheses overlap, for instance, notional respiratory failure may encompass apnea, prone sleep position, and asphyxia which may be seen to be linked to co-sleeping. For the purposes of this paper, each element will be assessed on the above criteria.

Organ weights in cases of sudden infant death syndrome: a German study

Despite its decreasing incidence, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) still remains an important cause of death in infancy. Since Felix Platter described the case of a child suffocated because of a massive goiter (Platter E. Suffocatio a struma interna abscondita, circa iugulum. Observationum in hominis affectibus plerisque corpori et animo, functionum lesione, dolore, aliave molestia et vitio incommodantibus. Libris tres, Part IX. Basel: König and Brandmylieri; 1614), many authors have attempted to verify the existence of a correlation between the dimensions of organs of infants and SIDS. The lack of recent published norms and the difficulty in finding a suitable control group by which to compare the cases of SIDS shows the importance of this study.This article presents the organ weights of 209 male and 132 female babies whose cause of death was SIDS. The data have been collected from 2 different studies: the Westphalian Cot Death Study from 1990 to 1994 and the German National Study on SIDS from 1998 to 2001. The organ weights increased from month to month during the first year of life showing a tendency towards higher weights in males compared with females (these are, however, not statistically significant). No significant differences compared with the recently published data of Thompson and Cohle, J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:575-585 were found.The heart weights were compared with a control group of 47 babies (21 females, 26 males) died because of both natural and unnatural causes. The weight of the organs that presented macro-microscopical pathologic changes was excluded.The weights of the heart were also compared with those published by Schulz and Giordano, Arch Pathol. 1962;74:464-471 and Kelmanson, Eur J Pediatr. 1996;155:440-444. This comparison showed minor differences which are discussed in the article. We suggest that organ weights obtained in SIDS cases can be used as norms in the first year of life.