Treatment outcome for patients with primary nonsmall-cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis

Long-term survival in patients with brain-only metastatic non-small cell lung cancer undergoing upfront intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery and definitive treatment to the thoracic primary site

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate modern clinical outcomes for patients with brain-only metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without definitive treatment of the primary site.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with synchronously diagnosed NSCLC and brain-only metastatic disease treated with intracranial SRS at a single institution were retrospectively identified. Patients were stratified based on whether they did (A) or did not (B) receive definitive primary site treatment. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2022, 103 patients were identified, 53 of whom received definitive primary site treatment. Median follow-up was 2.1 y (A) and 0.8 y (B) (p < 0.001). 28 (53 %) patients in Group A received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy versus 19 (38 %) in Group B (p = 0.13) and there were no other statistically significant baseline or treatment characteristic differences between the groups. 5-year local-PFS was 34.5 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p < 0.001). 5-year regional-PFS was 33.0 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p < 0.001). 5-year distant body-PFS was 34.0 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p < 0.001). 5-year CNS-PFS was 14.7 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p = 0.12). 5-year OS was 40.2 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p = 0.001). 5-year CSS was 67.6 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, lack of definitive treatment to the primary site (HR = 2.40), AJCC T3-4 disease (HR = 2.73), and lack of ICI therapy (HR = 2.86) were significant predictors of death.

CONCLUSION

Definitive treatment to the thoracic primary site in patients with brain-only metastatic NSCLC after intracranial radiosurgery was associated with slower progression of disease and improved survival.

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With CNS Metastasis: Disparities From a Real-World Analysis (GBOT-LACOG 0417)

Despite the advances in the approach to non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with CNS metastasis, access to timely diagnosis and treatment may not be optimal in many instances. Our main objective was to describe a cohort of patients with NSCLC with brain metastases from public and private cancer centers, and the differences between patients' presentation, treatment, and outcomes.

Worse survival in lung cancer patients with brain metastasis from public institutions.

Long-term Survival with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-directed Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Solitary Brain Metastasis

AIMS

At diagnosis, <1% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have synchronous solitary brain metastasis (SSBM). In prior cohorts without 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) staging, definitive treatment to intracranial and intrathoracic disease showed a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 11-21%. We investigated the long-term survival outcomes for patients with SSBM NSCLC, diagnosed in the FDG-PET/CT era and treated definitively with local therapies to both intracranial and intrathoracic sites of disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study assessed patients staged with FDG-PET/CT who received definitive lung and SSBM treatment from February 1999 to December 2017. A lung-molecular graded prognostic assessment (lung-molGPA) score was assigned for each patient using age, performance status score, and, where carried out, molecular status. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard models determined OS and PFS prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC and SSBM had a median age of 63 years (range 34-76). The median follow-up of all patients was 3.9 years. Thirty-three patients (67%) had ≥T2 disease, 23 (47%) had ≥N2. At 2 years, 45% of first failures were intracranial only (95% confidence interval 30-59). At 3 and 5 years, OS was 45% (95% confidence interval 32-63) and 30% (95% confidence interval 18-51), respectively. In ≥N1 disease, 5-year OS was 34% (95% confidence interval 18-63). The 3- and 5-year PFS was 8% (95% confidence interval 3-22) and 0%, respectively. Higher lung-molGPA was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.61, P = 0.002). Higher lung-molGPA (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.71, P = 0.005) and lower N-stage (hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.15, P = 0.007) were associated with longer PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive treatment of patients with NSCLC and SSBM staged with FDG-PET/CT can result in 5-year survivors, including those with ≥N1 disease.

When Should we Irradiate the Primary in Metastatic Lung Cancer?

Metastatic lung cancer encompasses a heterogenous group of patients in terms of burdens of disease, ranging from patients with extensive metastases to those with a limited number of metastatic lesions (oligometastatic disease). Histopathological heterogeneity also exists within two broad categories, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), portraying different patterns and evolution of disease. Local consolidative therapy to the primary tumour and metastatic sites, including surgery and/or radical dose radiotherapy, is increasingly being used to improve survival outcomes, particularly in the context of oligometastatic disease, with or without the use of molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Recently, randomised studies in oligometastatic NSCLC have shown that local consolidative therapy may confer a survival advantage. This review explores whether treating just the primary tumour with radiotherapy may similarly produce improved clinical outcomes. Such a treatment strategy may carry less potential toxicity than treating multiple sites upfront. The biological rationale behind the potential benefits of treating just the primary in metastatic malignancy is discussed. The clinical evidence of such an approach across tumour sites, such as breast and prostate cancer, is also explored. Then the review focuses on treating the primary in NSCLC and SCLC with radiotherapy, by first exploring patterns of failure in metastatic NSCLC and second exploring evidence on survival outcomes from studies in metastatic NSCLC and SCLC. It is challenging to draw conclusions on the clinical benefit of treating the primary cancer in isolation from the evidence available. This highlights the need to collect data within the ongoing clinical trials on the clinical outcome and toxicity of radiotherapy delivery to primary thoracic disease specifically. This challenge also identifies the need to design future clinical trials to produce randomised evidence for such an approach.

Addition of radiotherapy to the primary tumour in oligometastatic NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a discrete number of distant lesions (<5) that can be amenable to radical treatment. The treatment of the primary lung tumour in such stage IV cases is still debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcome of these patients and the added benefit in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) when radical treatment of the primary tumour with radiotherapy (RT) was delivered. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published up to July 2018. Prospective trials and retrospective series comparing RT vs no RT to the primary NSCLC in the presence of oligometastases were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS were aggregated according to a fixed or random effect model. Twenty-one studies for a total of 924 synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC were analysed. Median OS and PFS were 20.4 and 12 months. Pooled 1-2-3 and 5-year OS were 70.3%, 43.5%, 29.3% and 20.2% respectively. Overall survival was improved with the addition of thoracic RT (HR = 0.44, 95%CI 0.32-0.6; P < 0.001). Similarly, RT added to the primary tumour increased PFS (HR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.33-0.55; P < 0.001). The only variable associated with the median OS was the year of publication with most recent series associated with a better outcome. In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC and disease controlled with ablative therapy of distant metastases, a consolidation with radical RT to the primary tumour is associated with better survival and could be considered as a treatment modality in selected cases.

Prognostic factors of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The prognostic factors of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic factors of oligometastatic NSCLC patients who are most likely to achieve long-term survival.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane to identify eligible articles and performed the meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective comparative studies revealing the prognostic factors of oligometastatic NSCLC. The primary endpoint of interest was overall survival (OS).

Results

We analyzed data from twenty-four eligible studies, including data from 1,935 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. In the univariate analysis, we found no significant difference in OS of prognostic factors including age [hazard ratios (HRs) 1.02, 95% CI: 0.80-1.31, P=0.86], smoking status (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.80-1.46, P=0.62), type of metastases (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 0.86-3.03, P=0.14), but significantly positive prognoses containing female (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.45, P=0.03), (y)pN0 stage (HR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.40-2.36, P<0.00001), adenocarcinoma (HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10-1.88, P=0.008). In the multivariate analysis, patients with (y)pN0 stage had an obvious survival benefit compared with (y)pN1 (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.27-2.10, P=0.001), but no significant survival in contrast with (y)pN2 (HR 2.01, 95% CI: 0.80-5.03, P=0.14). In subgroup analyses, neither thoracic stage (HR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.52-2.78, P=0.55), (y)pT-stage of primary lung cancer (HR 1.38, 95% CI: 0.86-2.21, P=0.14) nor tumorous histology (HR 2.99, 95% CI: 2.10-4.28, P=0.91) and oligometastatic number (HR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.97-1.62, P=0.98) were significantly different in OS. However, patients with aggressive thoracic treatment (ATT) had improved survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.83, P=0.001), and notably, different strategies of ATT received by oligometastatic NSCLC patients might significantly influence survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82, P<0.00001).

Conclusions

Overall, factors including age, smoking status, type of metastasis were not associated with long-term survival of oligometastatic NSCLC patients. However, our finding suggests that aggressive therapies in the primary lung cancer, as well as female, (y)pT-stage, absence of nodal diseases, adenocarcinoma histology have been clarified as positive prognosis. Further studies of prospective study for these patients are warranted.

Surgical Management of Cerebral Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and Background

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of surgical resection of solitary brain metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods and Study Design

We report a retrospective analysis of 32 patients with single brain metastasis surgically excised at our hospital. All but one patient underwent postoperative whole brain radiation therapy.

Results

The median survival of patients was 12.5 months postoperatively (mean, 17 months), and the overall 1-year survival was 53%. Thirteen patients had recurrence of brain metastasis: 6 of 13 underwent reoperation for the recurrent lesion, and 1 of the 6 patients had a third craniotomy. Baseline characteristics, which significantly influenced survival, included age less than 60 years, tumor histology (ie, adenocarcinoma), and treatment of the primary lung cancer. The analysis did not yield any significant differences between treatment modalities.

Conclusions

Our findings correspond well with those reported in the literature and suggest that surgical resection of single brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer can improve survival over conservative management. Furthermore, surgical treatment of the primary tumor and the single brain metastasis, combined or not with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, represents an approach that merits further investigation with more patients and a prospective longitudinal design.

Long-term survival without surgery in NSCLC patients with synchronous brain oligometastasis: systemic chemotherapy revisited

Background

Among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), patients with TNM stage N0 to N1 and brain oligometastases (BOM) (less than 5 metastases) as the sole distant lesion (N0-1 BOM) who receive surgical treatments for the primary and metastatic sites reportedly have a better prognosis. Little data is available regarding the outcomes of patients treated with only systemic chemotherapy for the primary site and definitive treatment for synchronous BOM, compared with the outcomes of patients receiving surgical treatment for the primary site.

Methods

Stage IV NSCLC patients with or without N0-1 BOM, who underwent chemotherapy for the primary site between January 2000 and December 2010 were identified from the records of our institution.

Results

Among 936 advanced NSCLC patients treated with systemic chemotherapy, 19 patients had N0-1 BOM at presentation. The median overall survival (OS) period of the N0-1 BOM patients was 16.0 months (95% CI, 11.8-20.2 months), while that of the N2-3 BOM + non-BOM patients was 14.5 months (95% CI, 13.2-15.8 months), compared with 7-9 months in previous reports. The median 3- and 5-year survival rates of the N0-1 BOM patients were 28% and 19%.

Conclusions

The treatment outcomes of the N0-1 BOM patients who did not receive surgery for the primary site were better than those of the N2-3 BOM + non-BOM patients. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of surgery for the primary site in N0-1 BOM patients is warranted.

Lung cancer-associated brain metastasis: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic options

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality in humans. There are several reasons for this high rate of mortality, including metastasis to several organs, especially the brain. In fact, lung cancer is responsible for approximately 50% of all brain metastases, which are very difficult to manage. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer-associated brain metastasis brings up novel therapeutic promises with the hope to ameliorate the severity of the disease. Here, we provide an overview of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of lung cancer dissemination and metastasis to the brain, as well as promising horizons for impeding lung cancer brain metastasis, including the role of cancer stem cells, the blood-brain barrier, interactions of lung cancer cells with the brain microenvironment and lung cancer-driven systemic processes, as well as the role of growth factor/receptor tyrosine kinases, cell adhesion molecules and non-coding RNAs. In addition, we provide an overview of current and novel therapeutic approaches, including radiotherapy, surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, as also targeted cancer stem cell and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-based therapies, micro-RNA-based therapies and other small molecule or antibody-based therapies. We will also discuss the daunting potential of some combined therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer metastasis has opened up new avenues towards their eradication and provides interesting opportunities for future research aimed at the development of novel targeted therapies.

Ablative Therapy for Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The oligometastatic state represents a distinct entity among those with metastatic disease and consists of patients with metastases limited in number and location, representing an intermediate state between locally confined and widely metastatic cancer. Although similar, "oligorecurrence" (limited number of metachronous metastases under conditions of a controlled primary lesion) and "oligoprogressive" (disease progression at a limited number of sites with disease controlled at other disease sites) states are distinct entities. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the oligometastatic state is relatively common, with 20% to 50% of patients having oligometastatic disease at diagnosis. This subgroup of patients when receiving ablative therapy, such as surgery or stereotactic body radiation radiotherapy, can obtain markedly long progression-free and overall survival. The role of radical treatment for intracranial oligometastases is well established. Fewer data exist regarding radical treatment of extracranial metastases in lung cancer; however, retrospective series using surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy for extracranial oligometastatic disease in NSCLC have shown excellent local control, with a suggestion of improvement in progression-free survival. In the present report, we have reviewed the data on the treatment of brain metastases in oligometastatic NSCLC and the results of ablative treatment of extracranial sites. Recently, the first randomized trial comparing ablative treatment versus control in oligometastatic disease was reported, and those data are reviewed in the context of smaller series. Finally, areas of controversy are discussed and a therapeutic approach for patients with oligometastatic disease is proposed.

Should aggressive thoracic therapy be performed in patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent aggressive thoracic therapy (ATT) with those who did not.

METHODS

A systematic review of controlled trials of ATT on survival in synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC was conducted. Hazard ratio (HR) for the main endpoint OS was pooled using a fixed-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with single organ metastases, or with different numbers of brain metastases, or with different stages of thoracic disease. Pooled survival curves of OS were constructed.

RESULTS

Seven eligible retrospective observational cohort studies were identified including 668 synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC patients, of whom 227 (34.0%) received ATT. For patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, ATT was associated with a significant improvement of OS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.39-0.60; P<0.00001). In subgroup analysis, the association with OS was similar or even strengthened, with a HR of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.56) in single organ metastases group, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.31-0.75) in solitary brain metastasis group, and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.20-0.73) in thoracic stage I-II group, respectively. The pooled cumulative survival rates for patients received ATT were 74.9% at 1 year, 52.1% at 2 years, 23.0% at 3 years, and 12.6% at 4 years. The corresponding pooled survival for patients who did not receive ATT were 32.3%, 13.7%, 3.7%, and 2.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival benefit from ATT is common in synchronous oligometastatic patients. Selected patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC could also achieve long-term survival with ATT.

The Influence of Biomarker Mutations and Systemic Treatment on Cerebral Metastases from NSCLC Treated with Radiosurgery

Objective

The purpose of this study was to analyze outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with cerebral metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) particularly, focusing on associations of biomarkers and systemic treatments.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 134 patients who underwent GKS for brain metastases due to NSCLC between January 2002 and December 2012. Representative biomarkers including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, K-ras mutation, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation status were investigated.

Results

The median overall survival after GKS was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8–35.1 months). During follow-up, 63 patients underwent salvage treatment after GKS. The median salvage treatment-free survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.2–10.6 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that lower recursive partition analysis (RPA) class, small number of brain lesions, EGFR mutation (+), and ALK mutation (+) were independent positive prognostic factors associated with longer overall survival. Patients who received target agents 30 days after GKS experienced significant improvements in overall survival and salvage treatment-free survival than patients who never received target agents and patients who received target agents before GKS or within 30 days (median overall survival: 5.0 months vs. 18.2 months, and 48.0 months with p-value=0.026; median salvage treatment-free survival: 4.3 months vs. 6.1 months and 16.6 months with p-value=0.006, respectively). To assess the influence of target agents on the pattern of progression, cases that showed local recurrence and new lesion formation were analyzed according to target agents, but no significant effects were identified.

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients with brain metastases of NSCLC after GKS significantly differed according to specific biomarkers (EGFR and ALK mutations). Our results show that target agents combined with GKS was related to significantly longer overall survival, and salvage treatment-free survival. However, target agents were not specifically associated with improved local control of the lesion treated by GKS either development of new lesions. Therefore, it seems that currently popular target agents do not affect brain lesions themselves, and can prolong survival by controlling systemic disease status.

Risk factors and management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with close to half of all patients presenting with metastatic disease. A proportion of these patients with limited metastatic disease, termed oligometastatic disease, have been shown to benefit from a definitive treatment approach. Synchronous and metachronous presentation of oligometastatic disease have prognostic significance, with current belief that metachronous disease is more favorable. Surgical excision of intracranial and extracranial oligometastatic disease has been shown to improve survival, especially in patients with lymph node-negative disease, adenocarcinoma histology and smaller thoracic tumors. Definitive radiation to sites of oligometastatic disease and initial thoracic disease has also been shown to have a similar impact on survival for both intracranial and extracranial disease. Recent studies have reported on the use of targeted agents combined with ablative doses of radiation in the oligometastatic setting with promising outcomes. In this review, we present the historical and current literature describing surgical and radiation treatment options for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

Prognostic factors and long-term survival in surgically treated brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults. Despite multimodal treatment options such as microsurgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, prognosis still remains very poor. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes the most common source of brain metastases. In this study, prognostic factors in this patient population were identified through an in-depth analysis of clinical parameters of patients with BMs from NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical data of 114 NSCLC cancer patients who underwent surgery for BMs at the University Hospital Heidelberg were retrospectively reviewed for age, gender, type of treatment, time course of the disease, presence of neurologic symptoms, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), smoking history, presence of extracranial metastases at initial diagnosis of NSCLC, number, location and size of brain metastases. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Log-rank test and Cox' proportional hazard model, respectively.

RESULTS

Median survival time from surgery for BMs was 11.2 months. 18.4% (21 of 114) patients were long-term survivors (>24 months; range 26.3-75.1 months). Age, gender, size and number of intracranial metastases were not significantly associated with patient survival. Univariate analysis identified complete resection, postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and a preoperative KPS of >80% as positive prognostic factors. Infratentorial location and presence of extracranial metastases were shown to be negative prognostic factors. Surgery for the primary tumor was associated with a superior patient outcome both in univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our data strongly suggest that surgical treatment of the primary tumor and complete resection of brain metastases in NSCLC patients followed by WBRT improve survival. Moreover, long-term survivors (>2 years) were more frequent than previously reported.

Scientific impact of studies published in temporarily available radiation oncology journals: a citation analysis

The purpose of this study was to review all articles published in two temporarily available radiation oncology journals (Radiation Oncology Investigations, Journal of Radiosurgery) in order to evaluate their scientific impact. From several potential measures of impact and relevance of research, we selected article citation rate because landmark or practice-changing research is likely to be cited frequently. The citation database Scopus was used to analyse number of citations. During the time period 1996-1999 the journal Radiation Oncology Investigations published 205 articles, which achieved a median number of 6 citations (range 0-116). However, the most frequently cited article in the first 4 volumes achieved only 23 citations. The Journal of Radiosurgery published only 31 articles, all in the year 1999, which achieved a median number of 1 citation (range 0-11). No prospective randomized studies or phase I-II collaborative group trials were published in these journals. Apparently, the Journal of Radiosurgery acquired relatively few manuscripts that were interesting and important enough to impact clinical practice. Radiation Oncology Investigations’ citation pattern was better and closer related to that reported in several previous studies focusing on the field of radiation oncology. The vast majority of articles published in temporarily available radiation oncology journals had limited clinical impact and achieved few citations. Highly influential research was unlikely to be submitted during the initial phase of establishing new radiation oncology journals.

Comparison Between Surgical Resection and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with a Single Brain Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with single brain metastasis (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. Surgical resection (SR) with adjuvant irradiation and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are performed in the treatment of such lesions. This study compared both modalities in terms of tumor control and survival.

METHODS

During the period 2004-2011, 115 patients with single BM from NSCLC were treated with SR or SRS at our institution. Median patient age was 61 years. SR was performed in 43 patients, and SRS was performed in 72 patients. Most patients who underwent SR had adjuvant irradiation. Of patients, 63% in the SR group and 56% in the SRS group had synchronous presentation of BM and lung primary tumor. Thoracic disease was managed with curative intent in 60% of patients in the SR group compared with 50% of patients in the SRS group.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.2 months. Local control was 72% in patients in the SR group and 79% in patients in the SRS group (P = 0.992). Median survival for patients in the SR group was 13.3 months, and median survival for patients in the SRS group was 7.8 months (P = 0.047). Multivariate analyses revealed aggressive treatment of the primary NSCLC as an independent factor associated with prolonged survival in patients undergoing SR. In the SRS group, patients with metachronous metastasis showed a better prognosis. Metachronous presentation was associated with more aggressive management of the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients with single BM undergoing SR had a survival advantage. However, because SR and SRS achieved comparable local control of BM, patients receiving SRS should benefit from an equally aggressive treatment of the primary NSCLC, as thoracic management was the most important predictor of survival.

The Importance of Brain Metastasis in EGFR Mutation Positive NSCLC Patients

Introduction. Brain metastasis is a poor prognostic marker in lung cancer. However it is not known whether amongst patients with EGFR mutation those with brain metastases have a worse outcome. Methods. We compared the survival outcomes between EGFR mutation positive patients with and without brain metastases. In this retrospective analysis of prospective database of all metastatic lung cancer patients at our centre between July 2009 and December 2012, patients were treated with either combination chemotherapy or oral TKI. All patients with brain metastases received whole brain radiation. Kaplan Meier method was used for survival analysis and compared using log rank test. Results. 101 patients with EGFR mutated, metastatic lung cancer were studied. Fourteen had brain metastases and 87 did not. The common EGFR mutations were exon 19 deletion (61.3%) and exon 21 L858R mutation (28.7%). Overall response was 64% in extracranial metastasis group as compared to 50% in brain metastasis group. There was a significant worsening of median OS in the patients with brain metastases (11.6 months) compared with only extracranial metastases (18.7 months), P = 0.029. Conclusion. Amongst patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC, the presence of brain metastases leads to a worse outcome as compared to patients with extracranial metastases alone.

Early gastric cancer with suspected brain metastasis arising eight years after curative resection: a case report

Background

Brain metastasis from gastric cancer is fairly uncommon and prognosis is dismal. We report a case of early gastric cancer with brain metastasis arising 8 years after gastrectomy.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old Japanese female presented to our hospital complaining of dizziness, 8 years after undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Histopathological type of the tumor was well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Final TNM classification was T1b(sm1)N0M0, and pathological stage was IA. Further examination revealed a metastatic tumor in the cerebellum and multiple liver metastases. The brain metastasis was treated using radiotherapy and steroid. Systemic treatment for liver metastases was performed using the oral fluoropyrimidine drug S-1. Neurological symptoms decreased, enabling the patient to be discharged from hospital. However, chemotherapy was discontinued due to loss of appetite and general fatigue. She died 5 months after the diagnosis of brain metastasis due to progressive disease.

Conclusions

Cases of brain metastasis arising 8 years after gastrectomy for early gastric cancer have rarely reported. Aggressive treatment for brain metastases may be effective for improvement of the damage to neurological function and quality of life.

Aggressive therapy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma and synchronous brain-only oligometastatic disease is associated with long-term survival

OBJECTIVES

Optimal therapy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) presenting with synchronous brain-only oligometastases (SBO) is not well defined. We sought to analyze the effect of differing therapeutic paradigms in this subpopulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed NSCLC patients with 1-4 SBO diagnosed between 1/2000 and 1/2011 at our institution. Patients with T0 tumors or documented Karnofsky Performance Status <70 were excluded. Aggressive thoracic therapy (ATT) was defined as resection of the primary disease or chemoradiotherapy whose total radiation dose exceeded 45 Gy. Cox proportional hazards and competing risks models were used to analyze factors affecting survival and first recurrence in the brain.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included. Median follow-up was 31.9 months. Intrathoracic disease extent included 9 stage I, 10 stage II and 47 stage III patients. Thirty-eight patients received ATT, 28 did not. Patients receiving ATT were younger (median age 55 vs. 60.5 years, p=0.027) but were otherwise similar to those who did not. Receipt of ATT was associated with prolonged median overall survival (OS) (26.4 vs. 10.5 months; p<0.001) with actuarial 2-year rates of 54% vs. 26%. ATT remained associated with OS after controlling for age, thoracic stage, performance status and initial brain therapy (HR 0.40, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, the risk of first failure in the brain was associated with receipt of ATT (HR 3.62, p=0.032) and initial combined modality brain therapy (HR 0.34, p=0.046).

CONCLUSION

Aggressive management of thoracic disease in NSCLC patients with SBO is associated with improved survival. Careful management of brain disease remains important, especially for those treated aggressively.

Prognosis associated with surgery for non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis

PURPOSE

Several reports have described extended survival after aggressive surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and synchronous brain metastasis. This retrospective analysis assesses the prognostic factors in this population.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of 29 patients with synchronous brain metastasis from NSCLC, who underwent surgical treatment in our institution between 1980 and 2008. All patients underwent chest surgery to remove the primary lesion. The impact of several variables on survival was assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 9.6 months and the 5-year survival rate from the time of lung cancer resection was 20.6 %. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, primary tumor size, and the presence of lymph node involvement were predictive of overall survival (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis also identified those factors to be independent favorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the survival of patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer remains poor, surgical resection may benefit a select group of patients, particularly those with a normal CEA level, small tumor size, and node-negative status.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple cerebral metastases

This review highlights the experience of a single institution using the Leksell gamma knife for 8 years. More than 500 patients with multiple cerebral metastases received outpatient radiosurgery. The results prove that there is a high efficacy and attractively low morbidity of modern outpatient radiosurgery. When compared with whole brain radiation therapy, radiosurgery improved survival in patients with cerebral metastases. Most importantly, the number of brain metastases had no prognostic impact in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell cancer, malignant melanoma and gastrointestinal cancer.

Prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

Brain metastasis has a poor prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

We analyzed a total of 313 NSCLC patients with brain metastasis. We compared the prognoses between a group of less than four (group A) and a group of more than four or equal to four (≥4) (group B) brain metastases.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 334 days (group A, 164 patients, 52.4%) and 234 days (group B, 149 patients, 47.6%). Univariate analysis showed that the number of metastases, age at diagnosis of brain metastasis, smoking history, histologic type, and former stage of primary lung cancer before brain metastasis, had a significant influence. In addition, treatment for primary lung cancer lesions and brain metastasis also affected the overall survival (p < .0001). However, there was no difference in the overall survival between the two groups in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the number of brain metastases, classified by group A (<4) or group B (≥4) did not influence the overall survival of NSCLC patients. However, the overall survival in group A was better than in group B when analyzed, except for local brain treatment modalities in sub-group analysis, suggesting that non-optimized local treatment strategies might cause an unexpected prognosis result in this retrospective study. We suggest that more prospective studies might be needed for the optimal standard treatment for brain metastasis.

The Incremental Added Value of Including the Head in (18)F-FDG PET/CT Imaging for Cancer Patients

Purpose: To assess the value of extending the routinely used base-of-skull (BOS) to upper-thigh field of view (FOV) to include the head on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive top-of-head to foot PET/CT studies. Abnormalities above BOS were categorized as unsuspected or known and were correlated with pathology, MRI/CT, and clinical follow-up.

Results: Of the 1000 patients, 102 (10.2%) had potentially significant findings above BOS. Of these, 70/102 (69%) were known and 32/102 (31%) were unsuspected. Of the patients with unsuspected findings, follow-up data was unavailable in 7/32 (22%) and abnormalities were confirmed in 25/32 (78%). Of the 25 confirmed unsuspected findings, 4/25 (16%) were false positives and 21/25 (84%) were true positives. Of these, 13/21 (62%) were confirmed metastatic, and 8/21 (38%) were benign. Unsuspected finding of brain metastasis changed the management in 11/13 (85%) and staging in 4/13 (31%).

Conclusion: Including the head in PET/CT FOV incidentally detected clinically significant findings in 2.1% (21/1000) of patients. The detection of previously unsuspected metastasis had significant impact on patient management and provided more accurate staging.

A novel paradigm in the treatment of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is thought to uniformly carry a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 1 year and 5-year survival of less than 5%. In patients with a low volume (i.e. single site) of distant disease, the prognosis is slightly more favorable than that of more advanced (i.e. multiple sites of metastases) disease. For those with limited metastases, we developed a paradigm of adding concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the primary tumor once the tumor demonstrated chemotherapy sensitivity.

METHODS

Charts of patients from 1999-2006 with non-small cell lung cancer were reviewed to find those with a single extra-thoracic site of disease treated with combined modality therapy. We found nine patients of 640 who met these criteria. Initial treatment consisted of induction chemotherapy, except for brain metastases which were managed first (n=1). If patients experienced a response to chemotherapy without new metastases, the extra-thoracic site was treated for total control with curative dose chemoradiotherapy to the primary site. Survival, time to progression, and sites of progression were assessed.

RESULTS

Median survival was 28 months (95% CI 18-50 mo) with median time to progression of 15 months (95% CI 8-24 mo). All except one patient progressed in the CNS, either with brain metastases (n=7) or leptomeningeal disease (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Such an approach offers the potential for enhanced quality and quantity of survival by incorporating aggressive RT for select patients without disease progression after induction chemotherapy. Patients tended to fail in the CNS, suggesting the importance of continued surveillance of the neuraxis or possibly prophylactic cranial irradiation. Future plans will correlate outcomes with molecular markers.

Long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis treated with whole-brain radiotherapy and thoracic chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases occur in 30-50% of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and confer a worse prognosis and quality of life. These patients are usually treated with Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by systemic therapy. Few studies have evaluated the role of chemoradiotherapy to the primary tumor after WBRT as definitive treatment in the management of these patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcome of 30 patients with primary NSCLC and brain metastasis at diagnosis without evidence of other metastatic sites. Patients were treated with WBRT and after induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin for two cycles. In the absence of progression, concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the primary tumor with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin was indicated, with a total effective dose of 60 Gy. If disease progression was ruled out, four chemotherapy cycles followed.

RESULTS

Median Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) were 8.43 ± 1.5 and 31.8 ± 15.8 months, respectively. PFS was 39.5% at 1 year and 24.7% at 2 years. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 71.1 and 60.2%, respectively. Three-year OS was significantly superior for patients with N0-N1 stage disease vs. N2-N3 (60 vs. 24%, respectively; Response rate [RR], 0.03; p= 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSCLC and brain metastasis might benefit from treatment with WBRT and concurrent thoracic chemoradiotherapy. The subgroup of N0-N1 patients appears to achieve the greatest benefit. The result of this study warrants a prospective trial to confirm the benefit of this treatment.

Time for reappraisal of extracranial treatment options? Synchronous brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of the primary tumor in patients with brain metastases (BM) from newly diagnosed nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. The authors aimed to identify patient groups with synchronous BM for whom radical treatment of the primary site may be appropriate.

METHODS

The medical records of 167 patients treated at our center between November 2000 and June 2009 for newly diagnosed NSCLC and synchronous BM were reviewed. All patients underwent surgery/radiosurgery (n = 86) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT; n = 81) for BM. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed prognostic factors significant for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median OS of patients undergoing surgery/radiosurgery for BM was 12.1 months. Those undergoing "radical" thoracic treatment (n = 24) had a longer median OS (28.4 months) than those undergoing chemotherapy (n = 74; 12.1 months) or supportive therapy (n = 69; 5.6 months, P < .01). Patients with stage I thoracic disease (n = 23) had a longer median OS (18.5 months) than those with stage III (n = 43; 9.4 months) or with intra/extra-thoracic metastases other than BM (stage IV; n = 20; 2.7 months, P < .01). Median OS of WBRT patients was 3.7 months. One patient underwent radical thoracic treatment. Patients undergoing chemotherapy (n = 42) had a longer median OS (5.7 months) than patients undergoing supportive therapy only (n = 38; 1.6 months, P < .01). Performance status and age were also associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical thoracic treatments may be justified in selected patients <65-years-old, eligible to undergo surgery/radiosurgery for synchronous BM from NSCLC, even when stage III thoracic disease is present.

Aggressive Trimodality Therapy for T1N2M1 Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Solitary Brain Metastasis: Case Report and Rationale

Aggressive treatment, including resection of both metastasis and primary tumor, has been studied for non-small cell lung cancer patients with synchronous solitary brain metastasis. Involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes is considered a poor prognostic factor and a contraindication to surgical resection of the primary lung tumor after treatment for brain metastasis. Here we present the case of a patient who presented with a Stage IV T1N2M1 non-small cell lung cancer with synchronous solitary brain metastasis. He is alive and without evidence of disease two years after aggressive, multimodality treatment that included craniotomy, whole-brain radiation therapy, thoracic surgery, chemotherapy, and mediastinal radiation therapy.

The elderly with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer and solitary brain metastasis: does palliative thoracic radiotherapy have a useful role?

We evaluated the prognosis associated with advanced age by comparing the clinical features of individuals 65 years of age and older to those of younger patients with single metastasis to the brain alone (SMBA) and simultaneous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the potential role of palliative thoracic radiotherapy in this cohort of patients. Our 23-year experience included 72 consecutive (22 elderly and 50 non-elderly) people. Older patients predominantly presented with N0-N1 stage disease and coexisting illness. Univariate analysis showed that younger age (p=0.04) and operative removal of SMBA (p=0.01) were predictive of better survival. However, with multivariate analysis, resection of SMBA remained the sole predictor of prognosis. The application of NSCLC radiotherapy for palliation did not favorably alter outcome. In conclusion, elderly patients with simultaneous NSCLC and SMBA seem to fare less well than their younger counterparts. Moreover, the concurrent application of radiotherapy for palliation of the lung neoplasm was not prognostically advantageous.

Targeted Therapy for Brain Metastases: Improving the Therapeutic Ratio

Brain metastasis is the most common intracranial malignancy in adults. Improvements in modern imaging techniques are detecting previously occult brain metastases, and more effective therapies are extending the survival of patients with invasive cancer who have historically died from extracranial disease before developing brain metastasis. This combination of factors along with increased life expectancy has led to the increased diagnosis of brain metastases. Conventional treatment has been whole brain radiotherapy, which can improve symptoms, but potentially results in neurocognitive deficits. Several strategies to improve the therapeutic ratio are currently under investigation to either enhance the radiation effect, thereby preventing tumor recurrence or progression as well as reducing collateral treatment-related brain injury. In this review article, we discuss new directions in the management of brain metastases, including the role of chemical modifiers, novel systemic agents, and the management and prevention of neurocognitive deficits.

Update in the treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer

Brain metastases from lung cancer represent a prevalent and challenging clinical dilemma. The brain is an extremely common site of failure for non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, often as a solitary site of disease. Despite steady research developments during recent years, survival rates remain poor. Some research suggests that the outcomes and characteristics of brain metastases that result from lung cancer primary sites are perhaps different than those from other primary sites. Clinical treatment strategies should therefore be adjusted accordingly. This article reviews the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment strategies of brain metastases from lung cancer with a particular emphasis on recent research developments in the field.

Local control of brain metastases by stereotactic radiosurgery in relation to dose to the tumor margin

OBJECT

The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain tumors was established by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) in protocol 90-05, which defined three dose groups based on the maximal tumor diameter. The goal in this retrospective study was to determine whether differences in doses to the margins of brain metastases affect the ability of SRS to achieve local control.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2003, 202 patients harboring 375 tumors that met study entry criteria underwent SRS for treatment of one or multiple brain metastases. The median overall follow-up duration was 10.7 months (range 3-83 months). A dose of 24 Gy to the tumor margin had a significantly lower risk of local failure than 15 or 18 Gy (p = 0.0005; hazard ratio 0.277, confidence interval [CI] 0.134-0.573), whereas the 15- and 18-Gy groups were not significantly different from each other (p = 0.82) in this regard. The 1-year local control rate was 85% (95% CI 78-92%) in tumors treated with 24 Gy, compared with 49% (CI 30-68%) in tumors treated with 18 Gy and 45% (CI 23-67%) in tumors treated with 15 Gy. Overall patient survival was independent of dose to the tumor margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the RTOG 90-05 dosing scheme for brain metastases is associated with a variable local control rate. Tumors larger than 2 cm are less effectively controlled than smaller lesions, which can be safely treated with 24 Gy. Prospective evaluations of the relationship between dose to the tumor margin and local control should be performed to confirm these observations.

Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of the combined surgical treatment of lung cancer with synchronous brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer accounts for about 50% of brain metastases, of which nearly 25% are eligible for neurosurgery, providing a neurological control rate of up to 70% when followed by whole brain radiation therapy. How to manage the primary lung carcinoma remains elusive.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for synchronous brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer in a single institution, to determine overall survival and prognostic factors, with particular attention to the treatment of the primary lung tumor.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent surgical resection of synchronous brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 13.2 months. Prognosis mainly depended of the treatment of the lung tumor, with a marked survival advantage in the 29 patients receiving a focal treatment (thoracic surgery or radiotherapy), compared to the 22 other patients: median, 1-year, and 2-year survival were 22.5 months, 69%, and 42%, versus 7.1 months, 33%, and 5%, respectively (p<0.001); response to pre-operative chemotherapy before focal treatment was the main favorable prognostic factor (p=0.023), and further identified patients who had benefit from resection of the lung tumor, with a significantly better outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, by its therapeutic and prognostic value, may be considered as the cornerstone of the combined medical and surgical therapeutic sequence whereby brain metastasectomy is followed by chemotherapy and further focal treatment of the primary lung tumor in responders to chemotherapy.

Nonsmall cell lung cancer presenting with synchronous solitary brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

Solitary brain metastases occur in about 50% of patients with brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard of care is surgical resection of solitary brain metastases, or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, the optimal treatment for the primary site of newly diagnosed NSCLC with a solitary brain metastasis is not well defined. The goal was to distinguish which patients might benefit from aggressive treatment of their lung primary in patients whose solitary brain metastasis was treated with surgery or SRS.

METHODS

The cases of 84 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients presenting with a solitary brain metastasis and treated from December 1993 through June 2004 were retrospectively reviewed at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. All patients had undergone either craniotomy (n = 53) or SRS (n = 31) for management of the solitary brain metastasis. Forty-four patients received treatment of their primary lung cancer using thoracic radiation therapy (median dose 45 Gy; n = 8), chemotherapy (n = 23), or both (n = 13).

RESULTS

The median Karnofsky performance status score was 80 (range, 60-100). Excluding the presence of the brain metastasis, 12 patients had AJCC Stage I primary cancer, 27 had Stage II disease, and 45 had Stage III disease. The median follow-up was 9.7 months (range, 1-86 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates from time of lung cancer diagnosis were 49.8%, 16.3%, 12.7%, and 7.6%, respectively. The median survival times for patients by thoracic stage (I, II, and III) were 25.6, 9.5, and 9.9 months, respectively (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

By applying American Joint Committee on Cancer staging to only the primary site, the thoracic Stage I patients in our study with solitary brain metastases had a more favorable outcome than would be expected and was comparable to Stage I NSCLC without brain metastases. Aggressive treatment to the lung may be justified for newly diagnosed thoracic Stage I NSCLC patients with a solitary brain metastasis, but not for locally advanced NSCLC patients with a solitary brain metastasis.

Current strategies in whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases

Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been the primary treatment for patients with brain metastases for more than 50 years and provides effective palliative relief in most patients. Although advancements in radiotherapeutic technique continue to improve local and locoregional control, median survival for patients treated with WBRT monotherapy remains fixed at approximately 4 to 6 months. Key issues in the use of WBRT include optimizing its efficacy when it is used in conjunction with surgery, radiosurgery, radiosensitizers, and new chemotherapeutic agents. These multimodal approaches to brain metastases have resulted in significant increases in the median survival time in many patients. Radiosurgery is part of a continuing effort to improve the effects of radiation therapy, especially in brain metastases. The optimal combination of WBRT and radiosurgery remains to be elucidated, including appropriate timing or sequence and use in conjunction with other modalities. Newer radiosensitizing agents (e.g., efaproxiral [RSR-13] and motexafin gadolinium) have shown promise in the treatment of brain tumors, especially in specific patient subsets. Recently developed systemic chemotherapy agents, such as temozolomide, which crosses the blood-brain barrier, have a synergistic effect on brain metastases when used in conjunction with radiation. In addition, the use of interstitial chemotherapy agents provides highly focused local chemotherapy in the brain without increasing systemic toxicity; carmustine polymer wafer, in combination with WBRT, has shown promising results in treating brain metastases.

High-dose radiotherapy in trimodality treatment of Pancoast tumors results in high pathologic complete response rates and excellent long-term survival

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with a surgery-inclusive multimodality approach for Pancoast tumors.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients with Pancoast lung cancer who were enrolled for multimodality treatment between 1993 and 2003 at our institution were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients completed neodjuvant chemoradiation followed by en bloc surgical resection, whereas one patient received high-dose radiation alone followed by surgical intervention. There were 22 men and 15 women. Thirty-four lobectomies and 3 pneumonectomies were performed. Pretreatment non-small cell lung cancer stages were IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV (presenting with solitary brain metastasis) in 18, 8, 6, and 5 cases, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 36 (97.3%) patients. Operative mortality was 2.7% (n = 1). High-dose radiotherapy was successfully tolerated in all but 1 patient. Mean total radiation dose was 56.9 Gy. Pathologic complete response was found in 40.5% (n = 15) of patients. Recurrences were found in 50% (n = 18) of patients. Brain metastasis was the most common recurrence (n = 9), followed by other distant recurrences (n = 4) and local recurrences (n = 5). Median survival time for the group is 2.6 years, and median survival time (pathologic complete response) is 7.8 years. It is noteworthy that median survival time of patients with positive pretreatment lymph nodes (12 patients) was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of Pancoast tumors after neoadjuvant high-dose radiation and chemotherapy can be safely performed. High-dose radiation in trimodality treatment is well tolerated and might be beneficial. Similar to other studies, late central nervous system relapse is problematic and indicates a need for assessing the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in this disease.

Selective excision of metastatic brain tumors originating in the motor cortex with preservation of function

PURPOSE

Brain metastases are common in patients with cancer and can cause considerable morbidity or death. Metastasis in eloquent areas of the brain, particularly the primary motor cortex, may present significant treatment challenges.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen consecutive patients with metastasis within the primary motor cortex underwent selective microsurgical tumor resection. Operative, hospital, neuroimaging, and follow-up information was reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 10 women and seven men (mean age, 54.3 years) who underwent 17 operations for symptomatic brain metastases. Motor cortex was identified and tumor (mean volume, 10.2 cm(3)) was completely resected in all patients. Three patients had transient or reversible complications. Karnofsky performance scores improved in 16 of 17 patients at 4 weeks postoperatively, with a mean improvement of 1.8 grades compared with preoperative scores (P < .05). Overall survival of 16 patients with distant follow-up (> 6 months or until death) averaged 10.6 +/- 4.4 months, with nine of 16 (56%) assessable patients surviving 1 year or longer. Survival of these 16 patients, by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), was 11.2, 13.3, and 6.7 months for RPA classes I, II, and III, respectively. The cause of death in 14 of 15 patients who have died was progressive systemic disease; in one patient it was a combination of systemic and distant CNS disease progression. There were no local CNS recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Complete microsurgical resection of metastatic tumors in the primary motor cortex is feasible and efficacious, results in a sustained improvement in performance outcomes, and permits satisfactory long-term survival.

Silent radiological imaging time in patients with brain metastasis

Cerebral metastasis is a common finding in patients with systemic carcinoma and is an indication for progress of the disease. When brain metastases occur, they lead to a considerable decrease in both survival and the quality of life, in patients who otherwise might be functional. Furthermore, the location, size and number of such lesions, play a decisive role in management and prognosis. Even though early diagnosis and treatment is curative in rare cases, it may lead to a useful remission of the central nervous system (CNS) symptoms, enhance the patient's quality of life and prolong survival. The radiological exams established in the diagnosis of this condition, include computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In cases of "micrometastatic" disease though, these exams may be pronounced as normal. This retrospective study was performed in patients with advanced systemic disease, who presented with neurological findings of intracranial mass lesion, in the absence of radiological evidence. Early-occurring symptoms were evaluated in accordance to location of the primary disease and follow-up with repetitive MRI scans was performed, in an attempt to confirm the diagnosis and facilitate prompt and appropriate treatment.

MR-imaging of the brain of neurologic asymptomatic patients with large cell or adenocarcinoma of the lung. Does it influence prognosis and treatment?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and extensive neurological examination by a neurologist was performed as part of initial staging evaluation of 91 neurologic asymptomatic patients with large cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the lung. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months. Evidence of metastatic brain disease was documented in 13 (14%) patients. Two of these patients were found suspective of brain metastases (BM) by the neurologist. The detection of BM resulted in upstaging of 1 (3%) patient in stage I/II, 4 (21%) patients in stage IIIA and 2 (11%) patients in IIIB. Especially for patients in stage III this upstaging is of importance as aggressive locoregional treatment can be abandoned. Evaluation of the brain with MRI is a sensitive method of detecting BM in neurologic asymptomatic patients and is recommended as part of the initial staging of patients with large cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the lung in stage III. Additional examination by the neurologist is of little value to provide information of the neurologic status.

Treatment options for brain metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Brain metastases are a common complication for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the past, treatment of brain metastases and lung cancer focused on symptom palliation with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and steroids because of the grim outlook for patients. However, recent advances in technology and surgical techniques have created more options for the management of brain metastases, which include surgery, irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and chemotherapy. These aggressive approaches have resulted in an improvement of neurologic outcomes and survival rates of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be divided into three groups: solitary CNS metastases with controlled or controllable primary disease, oligometastatic disease (fewer than 3 metastases), and multiple metastases. For patients with solitary CNS metastases, long-term survival is possible. A radical treatment approach involving surgical resection or radiosurgery, followed by WBRT, is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease, surgical resection or radiosurgery is considered in selected cases and WBRT is indicated. For patients with multiple metastases, WBRT is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease and those with multiple metastases, recent evidence indicates that systemically effective chemotherapy may produce responses and can be instituted safely before radiotherapy. The treatment timing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be individualized.

A review of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases

This review addresses the epidemiology, historical reports, current issues, data and controversies involved in the management of brain metastases. The literature regarding surgery, whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or some combination of those treatments is discussed as well as issues of cost-effectiveness. Ongoing prospective randomized trials will further elucidate the optimal management for patients with brain metastases. Until those data are available, clinicians are encouraged to apply the existing data reviewed here in conjunction with best clinical judgment. A brief clinical guide is as follows. Patients with a solitary metastasis in an operable location and symptomatic mass effect should undergo surgery. Patients with poor performance status (KPS < 70) or more than three brain metastases should receive WBRT alone. Patients with 1-3 brain metastases and KPS >or= 70, should receive WBRT + SRS. If the patient refuses WBRT or needs salvage after WBRT, then SRS alone is appropriate. Clinicians should not be too dogmatic and should always apply the best clinical judgment.