L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. An update of earlier findings and a comparison with those utilizing L-PAM plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)

A Short History of Bernard Fisher's Contributions to Randomized Clinical Trials

Dr. Bernard Fisher (1918-2019) was an early proponent of evidence-based medicine using the mechanism of prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trials to test biological and clinical hypotheses. In this article, I trace how his early scientific work in striving to understand the nature of cancer metastasis through animal experiments led to a new, testable, clinical hypothesis: that surgery to remove only the tumor and a small amount of tissue around it was as effective as the more disfiguring operations that were then the standard treatment. Fisher's work with the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) using large, randomized clinical trials to demonstrate the veracity of this hypothesis led to a new paradigm in which the emphasis was placed on how systemic therapies used at an early stage of disease could effectively eradicate breast cancer for many patients. This new therapeutic approach led to the successful development of new treatments, many of which are widely used today. Ultimately, the new paradigm led to successfully preventing breast cancer in women who were at high risk for the disease but who had not yet been diagnosed with the disease. Throughout his entire career, Fisher championed the use of large prospective, randomized clinical trials despite criticism from many in the medical community who strongly criticized his use of randomization as a mechanism for testing clinical hypotheses. The approach he and the NSABP employed is still considered to be the highest standard of evidence in conducting clinical studies.

Anthracycline Use for Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: a Review

OPINION STATEMENT

Anthracycline-based regimens have been an important treatment component for patients with breast cancer. As demonstrated in the last Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) meta-analysis, anthracycline-based regimens decrease breast cancer mortality by 20-30%. Anthracycline toxicities include the rare-but potential morbid-cardiotoxicity or leukemogenic effect, and the almost universal-but very distressing-alopecia. Due to potential toxicities, and large number of patients being exposed, several worldwide trials have re-examined the role of anthracycline-based regimens in the management of breast cancer. Current literature supports that anthracyclines are not required for all patients with breast cancer and should be avoided in those with high cardiac risk. Recent results from the ABC trials suggest that anthracyclines should not be spared for patients with triple negative breast cancer (regardless of axillary node involvement) or HER2-/ER+ with significant node involvement. Based on current literature, for HER2-negative patients with low-risk breast cancer, anthracyclines could be spared with regimens such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) or docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). Patients with intermediate or high-risk breast cancer should be considered for anthracycline-based regimens based on other factors such as age, comorbidities, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and genomic profiling. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with low risk could be treated with paclitaxel and trastuzumab. For the remaining patients with HER2 overexpression, while docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) has demonstrated to improve disease-free survival (DFS), anthracycline-containing regimens should be discussed, especially for those with very high-risk breast cancer. Although several biomarkers, such as topoisomerase II (TOP2A) and chromosome 17 centromeric duplication (Ch17CEP) have been proposed to predict benefit from anthracycline regimens, further research is required to delineate their proper utility in the clinical setting.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: Preliminary Communication

Following surgical resection of Dukes’ B or C colorectal cancers 72 patients have been randomly allocated to receive: 5-fluorouracil; or 5-fluorouracil and levamisole; or no treatment. Adjuvant treatment was continued for one year. 66 patients remain evaluable for up to 24 months. Preliminary results show no significant differences in survival or recurrence rates. Two patients receiving 5-fluorouracil and levamisole developed severe, but reversible, neutropenia. Other side effects were uncommon.

Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: Past Half Century Moving Forward Advancing Patient Outcomes

Clinical trials in breast cancer have contributed immensely to the advancements of modern multimodal breast cancer treatment. Due to improved screening methods and more effective biologic-based tailored systemic therapies, the extent of surgery necessary for local and systemic control of disease is decreasing. Sequential trials for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have changed the management of this disease and are culminating in randomized active surveillance studies in an effort potentially to prevent overtreatment of low- and intermediate-grade disease. For patients with initial node-positive disease, clipping and marking of the biopsy-proven nodal metastases before the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy can allow for selective node dissection based on the axillary response. With the current advances in primary systemic therapy, feasibility trials are beginning to investigate the potential of nonoperative therapy for invasive cancers with percutaneously documented pathologic complete response. This article presents a review and update on landmark clinical trials related to DCIS, the extent of axillary surgery in node-positive disease, and the integration of systemic therapy with local therapy.

The Globalization of Cooperative Groups

The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-supported adult cooperative oncology research groups (now officially Network groups) have a longstanding history of participating in international collaborations throughout the world. Most frequently, the US-based cooperative groups work reciprocally with the Canadian national adult cancer clinical trial group, NCIC CTG (previously the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group). Thus, Canada is the largest contributor to cooperative groups based in the United States, and vice versa. Although international collaborations have many benefits, they are most frequently utilized to enhance patient accrual to large phase III trials originating in the United States or Canada. Within the cooperative group setting, adequate attention has not been given to the study of cancers that are unique to countries outside the United States and Canada, such as those frequently associated with infections in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. Global collaborations are limited by a number of barriers, some of which are unique to the countries involved, while others are related to financial support and to US policies that restrict drug distribution outside the United States. This article serves to detail the cooperative group experience in international research and describe how international collaboration in cancer clinical trials is a promising and important area that requires greater consideration in the future.

[Evolving strategies over time for treatment of breast cancer]

The natural history of breast diseases has changed overtime and successive therapeutic strategies have been adapted accordingly. Recently, biological findings on geno- and phenotypic characteristics of tumor cells offer new basis for the development of treatments that target homogenous and various subtypes of breast cancer. Unfortunately, traditional clinical research tools are not in phase with rapid changes in both biological knowledge of the disease and new targeted agents. New methodological approaches are urgently needed to validate such changes and improvements in prognosis.

A dose escalation trial of adjuvant cyclophosphamide and epirubicin in combination with 5-fluorouracil using G-CSF support for premenopausal women with breast cancer involving four or more positive nodes

BACKGROUND

Dose-dense and dose-intensive regimens have improved the outcome of breast cancer in high-risk women with operable disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-three premenopausal women with Stage 2, 3 breast cancer and > or =4 positive axillary nodes were treated in three successive cohorts with 70 mg/m(2) of epirubicin, 500 mg/m(2) of 5-fluorouracil and G-CSF every 14 days for 12 cycles. Cyclophosphamide (C) was given at 700 mg/m(2), 900 mg/m(2), and 1100 mg/m(2) doses. Patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first four cycles, the primary endpoint of the trial.

RESULTS

No DLTs were seen at C 700 mg/m(2); at C 900 mg/m(2) two of 16 patients experienced febrile neutropenia and poor performance status; at C 1100 mg/m(2), 1 of 31 patients experienced poor performance status. Over 6 months, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 anemia and severe fatigue were observed. Clinical congestive heart failure occurred in three patients over 4 years.

CONCLUSION

A dose-intense and dose-dense regimen of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil was delivered with G-CSF without apparent increase in acute toxicity. Cyclophosphamide could be increased to more than twice the standard dose at the cost of more anemia and fatigue.

Amenorrhea in premenopausal women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Chemotherapy and ovarian ablation both independently improve survival in premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Amenorrhea is a well-recognized occurrence after chemotherapy. The rate of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea varies with patient age and chemotherapy regimens administered. However, the impact of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea on prognosis is still being defined. Older studies in premenopausal women argue that the benefit with chemotherapy is a result of direct cytotoxicity alone. However, studies that restrict outcome analysis to hormone receptor-positive tumors suggest that chemotherapy has a dual mechanism in women with hormone-responsive tumors; indirect endocrine manipulation secondary to chemotherapy-induced ovarian suppression and direct cytotoxicity. The significant health ramifications involved with the induction of premature menopause as well as potential benefits necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. This review will discuss the incidence of amenorrhea with commonly-used adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens, the possible benefits of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, and the challenges of interpreting the existing data in breast cancer trials.

Long-term follow-up of a randomised trial designed to determine the need for irradiation following conservative surgery for the treatment of invasive breast cancer

Four hundred consecutive patients aged under 70 years diagnosed with a clinical T1 or T2 breast cancer were randomised to receive post-operative radiotherapy (n = 208) or not (n = 192), and monitored to record all local recurrences, distant recurrences and deaths for up to 20 years (median 13.7 years). All patients were treated by wide local excision and adjuvant therapy [estrogen receptor (ER) positive: tamoxifen; ER negative: CMF chemotherapy]. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods were used to estimate and compare survival and recurrence. The 20-year Kaplan-Meier rates for local breast recurrence were 28.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.6% to 37.6%] for radiotherapy and 49.8% (95% CI 40.8% to 58.9%). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to disease-free or overall survival. The hazard ratio for death among women who received radiation, as compared with those that did not, was 0.91 (95% CI 0.64-1.28; P = 0.59). Therefore, post-operative radiotherapy produced a clear-cut reduction in locoregional recurrence 0.45 (0.31-0.64; P = 0.0001), but did not influence the incidence of distant metastases or time of death. However, of the 119 patients who had a local recurrence, 51 (42.8%) had a distant recurrence, whereas of the 281 without local recurrence only 59 (21%) ever had a distant recurrence. A Cox's regression analysis with local recurrence as a time-dependent variable showed a risk ratio of 5.28 (P < 0.0001). This strong relationship is dependent on the intensity of post-treatment follow-up and investigation.

Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In 1976, we initiated a randomized trial to determine whether lumpectomy with or without radiation therapy was as effective as total mastectomy for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1851 women for whom follow-up data were available and nodal status was known underwent randomly assigned treatment consisting of total mastectomy, lumpectomy alone, or lumpectomy and breast irradiation. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative-incidence estimates of the outcome were obtained.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of recurrent tumor in the ipsilateral breast was 14.3 percent in the women who underwent lumpectomy and breast irradiation, as compared with 39.2 percent in the women who underwent lumpectomy without irradiation (P<0.001). No significant differences were observed among the three groups of women with respect to disease-free survival, distant-disease-free survival, or overall survival. The hazard ratio for death among the women who underwent lumpectomy alone, as compared with those who underwent total mastectomy, was 1.05 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.23; P=0.51). The hazard ratio for death among the women who underwent lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation, as compared with those who underwent total mastectomy, was 0.97 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.14; P=0.74). Among the lumpectomy-treated women whose surgical specimens had tumor-free margins, the hazard ratio for death among the women who underwent postoperative breast irradiation, as compared with those who did not, was 0.91 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.06; P=0.23). Radiation therapy was associated with a marginally significant decrease in deaths due to breast cancer. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in deaths from other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation continues to be appropriate therapy for women with breast cancer, provided that the margins of resected specimens are free of tumor and an acceptable cosmetic result can be obtained.

Progress in systemic chemotherapy of primary breast cancer: an overview

Substantial progress has been made in the multidisciplinary management of primary breast cancer during the last 30 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to significantly reduce the annual risk of cancer recurrence and mortality, and these effects persist even 15 years after diagnosis. Combination chemotherapy is superior to single-agent therapy and anthracycline-containing regimens. Those that combine an anthracycline with 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide are more effective than regimens without an anthracycline. Six cycles of a single regimen appear to provide optimal benefit. Dose reductions below the standard range are associated with inferior results. Dose increases that require growth factor or hematopoietic stem cell support are under investigation; at this time, the existing results provide no compelling reason to use this strategy outside a clinical trial. Regimens using fixed crossover designs with two non-cross-resistant regimens are being evaluated. The addition of a taxane to anthracycline-containing regimens is currently under intense scrutiny, and preliminary analysis of the first three clinical trials has shown encouraging, albeit not compelling, results. For patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, the sequential administration of chemotherapy and 5 years of tamoxifen therapy provides additive benefits. No compelling evidence exists to combine ovarian ablation with chemotherapy. Most side effects and toxic effects are self-limited, although premature menopause requires monitoring and preventive interventions to preserve bone mineral density. The small risk of acute leukemia is of concern, and additional research to develop safer regimens is clearly indicated. The overall effect of optimal local/regional treatment combined with an anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and a taxane (and, for patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, 5 years of tamoxifen therapy) is a greater than 50% reduction in annual risks of recurrence of and death from breast cancer. For most patients at intermediate or high risk of cancer recurrence, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy exceed by far its unwanted effects.

Long-term follow-up of a phase II trial studying a weekly doxorubicin-based multiple drug adjuvant therapy for stage II node-positive carcinoma of the breast

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy improves outcomes in women with breast cancer (BC) that involves axillary nodes. This single-arm study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive doxorubicin-based multidrug regimen as adjuvant therapy in women with stage II, node positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 7/80 and 8/85, 654 women, aged 25-73, who had a mastectomy for stage IIB BC were accrued. Patients with prior RT, chemotherapy, or surgical or radiation castration within 1 year of diagnosis were excluded. Treatment consisted of: 6 weekly courses of IV cyclophosphamide (C) 400 mg/m2, doxorubicin (A) 10 mg/m2, vincristine (V) I mg/m2, fluorouracil (F) 400 mg/m2, and a tapering course of prednisone followed by 12 courses of C 400 mg/m2, A 20mg/m2, V 1 mg/m2, F 400 mg/m2 given every 2 weeks. Patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors received Tamoxifen 10 mg bid between weeks 8 and 30. Treatment did not exceed 8 months. Median follow-up is 13.1 years.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty six patients are eligible. Fewer positive (+) nodes, premenopausal status, and positive progesterone receptor status are significantly (p < 0.05) associated with longer survival. At 10 years, 61% were relapse-free in the 1-3 +node group compared to 37 and 21% in the 4-9 and > or = 10 +node groups, respectively (p = 0.0001). Relapse-free survival at 10 years is 50% for premenopausal and 45% for postmenopausal patients. Severe or life-threatening hematological toxicity was seen in 6/630 (< 1%) patients. Four patients had severe (grade 3) neurotoxicity which resolved. No cardiac toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

This adjuvant regimen compares favorably to other published adjuvant treatments with similar length of follow-up.

Locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: incidence, risk factors and survival

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. Patients with LRR can suffer both local consequences and symptoms of metastatic disease, as LRR is an independent predictor of subsequent distant metastases. Much of the available data on LRR is derived from small, single institution, retrospective studies, so marked differences in the incidence rates for LRR, it's risk factors and subsequent systemic recurrence are reported. The purpose of this review was to try and collate this data in a format that would be useful for both clinicians and their patients.

Randomized adjuvant trial to evaluate the addition of tamoxifen and PSK to chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer. 5-Year results from the Nishi-Nippon Group of the Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Organization

BACKGROUND

A randomized adjuvant trial was conducted from October 1982 to January 1985 to evaluate the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to combination chemotherapy with perioperative mitomycin C (MMC) and ftorafur (FT) for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors and the addition of PSK, a biologic response modifier, to MMC+FT chemotherapy for patients with ER-negative tumors in operable Stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA cancer. The doses used were 20 mg of oral TAM daily, 600 mg of oral FT daily, and 3 g of oral PSK daily for 2 years. Intravenous MMC (13 mg/m2) was given on the day of operation.

METHODS

A total of 967 patients were entered and randomized by stratification based on ER status and staging (1978 International Union Against Cancer [UICC] criteria at the time of trial execution). Of 967 patients, 914 (94.5%) were evaluable. At 5-year follow-up, significant prolonged overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) times were seen with the addition of TAM in patients with ER-positive and Stage IIIA T3N0 cancer (1987 UICC-American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] criteria); however, no significant survival benefit from TAM was seen in patients with ER-positive and Stage IIA T2N1 cancer. There was no significant difference between regimens, with or without PSK, in patients with ER-negative disease.

RESULTS

Results of subset analyses suggested a benefit from TAM in postmenopausal patients with ER-positive and Stage IIA T2N1 cancer and a benefit from PSK in patients with node-negative, ER-negative, and Stage IIA T2N1 cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year results of the current trial showed a survival advantage by the addition of TAM to chemotherapy in patients with ER-positive and Stage IIIA T3N0 cancer.

Surgical treatment for chest wall recurrence of breast cancer

From 1977 to 1987, 23 patients with isolated chest wall recurrence, excluding sternal metastasis, from breast cancer underwent full thickness chest wall resection. The 5-year survival rate after chest wall resection was 48% but the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 26%. Mediastinal metastasis was proved histologically at the time of chest wall resection in 7 patients, and survival period with mediastinal involvement was significantly (P less than 0.01) shorter than that with no mediastinal involvement (n = 16). In 17 patients with a long disease-free interval (DFI greater than or equal to 24 months), survival was longer than in 6 patients with a short DFI (less than 24 months). For the selected patients without mediastinal involvement and long DFI, surgical treatment for chest wall recurrence of breast cancer should play a significant role in improving the quality of life, and even in prolonging the survival rate.

A randomized trial of chemotherapy (L-PAM vs CMF) and irradiation for node positive breast cancer. Eleven year follow-up of a Piedmont Oncology Association trial

158 evaluable patients with stage II, lymph node positive, carcinoma of the breast were randomized to adjuvant therapy with either melphalan (L-PAM) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) after mastectomy. In addition, patients were randomized to be treated with or without post-operative irradiation therapy (RT) in addition to their chemotherapy. At a median follow-up time of 11 years, there is no difference in time to relapse (P = 0.69) or survival (P = 0.55) among the four treatment groups. Multivariate analysis including treatment arm, age, race, tumor size, histologic type, performance status, time to onset of treatment, menopausal status, and number of positive nodes, revealed that only the number of positive nodes (less than 4 vs greater than or equal to 4) was related to disease-free and overall survival. Ten year relapse-free survival for patients with less than 4 positive nodes compared to those with greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes was 63% versus 30%, and overall survival 63% versus 41%, respectively. Patients who received post-operative radiation therapy had significantly less local recurrence than those treated with chemotherapy alone (P = 0.03) but without improvement in relapse-free or overall survival. In this trial, post-operative radiation therapy when added to chemotherapy decreased the risk of local recurrence without adverse effects on survival. Treatment outcome was not influenced by chemotherapy regimen, but differences may have been obscured by the small sample size.

NSABP trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A further look at the evidence

Two decades ago the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) began to test the hypothesis that adjuvant chemotherapy would influence favorably the postsurgical survival rates of women with breast cancer. Although the use of phenylalanine mustard (melphalan or (L-PAM) has been supplemented by other agents, the thrust to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy as standard treatment was created by an L-PAM series of five trials using L-PAM or L-PAM plus fluorouracil. Only the first trial, B-05, contained an untreated group. The main treated groups in these five trials are similar to each other in survival probabilities, and the main untreated group in B-05 is not different in survival than the combined results of these five trials. There were a total of nine comparison in each study-and in B-05 the subgroup of treated women 49 years or younger with one to three positive node was found to be different than the untreated group. Four subsequent subgroups of women who were 49 years or younger with one to three positive nodes are not similar in survival despite the fact that they were developed from similar main groups that had similar treatment. The initial treated subgroup in B-05 had a survival outcome that was never again achieved in the subsequent four studies. The untreated subgroup in B-05 was not different than three of the four subsequently treated subgroups. The NSABP now has evidence that denies the conclusion that adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in premenopausal node-positive women. Recommendations that adjuvant chemotherapy become standard treatment for premenopausal node-positive women should be seriously reconsidered and probably withdrawn.

Recent advances in the treatment of breast cancer

Multidisciplinary efforts have defined a number of prognostic factors and newer strategies to improve the outcome of patients with breast cancer. Conservative surgery has led to improved functional and cosmetic results. The development of a number of effective adjuvant regimens has led to improved survival. In patients with stage I disease, several biological characteristics of tumor have been identified that are associated with increased risk of relapse. A multimodality approach to patients with locally advanced disease and inflammatory cancer has resulted in improved survival. A number of hormonal and cytotoxic drug contaminations can palliate metastatic disease, with a small fraction of patients remaining in extended remission. Dose-intensive programs may lead to further improvements in survival of selected patients with this disease.

Evaluation of the worth of corynebacterium parvum in conjunction with chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for primary breast cancer. Eight-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-10

During the 1970s, information obtained from animal tumor models and from patients with a spectrum of solid tumors indicated the worth of a variety of immunostimulating agents. These findings provided a biological and clinical rationale for conducting randomized trials to evaluate the worth of those agents. Consequently, in May 1977 the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) implemented a randomized trial to determine whether Corynebacterium parvum (C. parvum, CP) plus chemotherapy would be more effective than chemotherapy alone in prolonging the disease-free survival (DFS) and survival (S) of patients with primary operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. The results of that trial through 8 years of follow-up fail to indicate that treatment with CP used in conjunction with l-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) results in a better DFS and S than that observed after chemotherapy alone. Use of the immunomodulator has instead resulted in a poorer, but not statistically significant, outcome. Despite adjustments made to account for any imbalance in distribution of prognostic factors between the two treatment groups and despite considering treatment compliance as a factor, the unfavorable outcome persisted. A high incidence of fever and chills was associated with the administration of CP. The administration of hydrocortisone before each CP treatment reduced the frequency of those and other systemic effects. The failure to demonstrate a benefit from CP is in keeping with the failure of other nonspecific stimulating agents to contribute to the creation of a new paradigm for the treatment of breast cancer.

Nucleolar organiser regions: new prognostic variable in breast carcinomas

Nucleolar organiser regions (NORs), which are important for regulating protein synthesis, were identified in 20 breast carcinomas by means of a silver (Ag) staining technique. Infiltrating neoplasms with metastases in four or more axillary lymph nodes possessed, on average, a greater number of AgNORs per cell nucleus compared with neoplasms without nodal disease, or with one to three positive lymph nodes. The size, morphology, and distribution of AgNORs within the nucleus were also different in the two study groups. Overall, these findings suggest that breast carcinomas with multiple, irregular, and widely dispersed AgNORs tend to be of high grade malignancy.

Thymidine labeling index in breast tumors

The relationship between primary tumor proliferative activity and clinical and pathologic characteristics was analyzed in relation to menopausal status in 32 patients with malignant or benign breast disease. The thymidine labeling index (TLI) showed significantly higher median values in the cancer patients (3.48 per cent) than in the patients with benign diseases (1.02 per cent). TLI was not significantly affected by delayed incubation at room temperature for about 1 hour. In the breast cancer patients, TLI did not significantly correlate to tumor size, the presence of axillary lymph node metastasis or pathologic nuclear grading. The only significant difference was limited to the breast cancer patients without axillary lymph node metastasis in relation to menopausal status; the TLI in the premenopausal patients (5.10 per cent) was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than that in the postmenopausal patients (2.28 per cent). These data thus suggest that among premenopausal patients without axillary lymph node metastasis, those with a high TLI could be potential candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer

In 1985 we presented results of a randomized trial involving 1843 women followed for five years that indicated that segmental breast resection (lumpectomy) followed by breast irradiation is appropriate therapy for patients with Stage I or II breast cancer (tumor size, less than or equal to 4 cm), provided that the margins of the resected specimens are free of tumor. Women with positive axillary nodes received adjuvant chemotherapy. Lumpectomy followed by irradiation resulted in a five-year survival rate of 85 percent, as compared with 76 percent for total mastectomy, a rate of survival free of distant disease of 76 percent, as compared with 72 percent, and a disease-free survival rate of 72 percent, as compared with 66 percent. In the current study, we have extended our observations through eight years of follow-up. Ninety percent of the women treated with breast irradiation after lumpectomy remained free of ipsilateral breast tumor, as compared with 61 percent of those not treated with irradiation after lumpectomy (P less than 0.001). Among patients with positive axillary nodes, only 6 percent of those treated with radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy had a recurrence of tumor in the ipsilateral breast. Lumpectomy with or without irradiation of the breast resulted in rates of disease-free survival (58 +/- 2.6 percent), distant-disease-free survival (65 +/- 2.6 percent), and overall survival (71 +/- 2.6 percent) that were not significantly different from those observed after total mastectomy (54 +/- 2.4 percent, 62 +/- 2.3 percent, and 71 +/- 2.4 percent, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rates of distant-disease-free survival (P = 0.2) or survival (P = 0.3) among the women who underwent lumpectomy (with or without irradiation), despite the greater incidence of recurrence of tumor in the ipsilateral breast in those who received no radiation. We conclude that our observations through eight years are consistent with the findings at five years and that these new findings continue to support the use of lumpectomy in patients with Stage I or II breast cancer. We also conclude that irradiation reduces the probability of local recurrence of tumor in patients treated with lumpectomy.

Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tamoxifen as adjuncts to surgery in early breast cancer: a summary of three randomized trials

The paper summarizes up-dated results of three randomized adjuvant trials from the Stockholm Breast Cancer Group. The objective of all studies included an evaluation of the role of megavoltage radiation in the primary management of patients with early breast cancer. The first trial was started in 1971 and included 960 pre- and postmenopausal patients with operable disease. The study compared adjuvant radiotherapy with surgery alone. All patients were treated with a modified radical mastectomy. There was a sustained improvement of the recurrence-free survival with radiotherapy (p less than 0.001). Among node positive cases radiation reduced the frequency of both loco-regional recurrence (p less than 0.001) and distant metastasis (p less than 0.01). This observation indicates that distant dissemination in subgroups of patients can originate from uncontrolled local deposits of tumor cells, for instance in the regional lymph nodes. No adverse effect from radiation on long-term survival was observed. The second study was started in 1976 and compared postmastectomy radiation with adjuvant chemotherapy in pre- and postmenopausal high-risk patients. At a mean follow-up of 6 1/2 years there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the two treatments. However, postmenopausal patients fared better with radiotherapy (p less than 0.01). In this subgroup, radiation was more effective than adjuvant chemotherapy in reducing both distant metastases (p less than 0.01) and loco-regional recurrences (p less than 0.001). In the third trial--which only included postmenopausal patients--2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen was compared with no adjuvant endocrine treatment. The number of treatment failures was significantly reduced with tamoxifen (p less than 0.01) but there was no significant overall survival benefit. Subset analysis indicated that tamoxifen improved the recurrence-free survival among patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p less than 0.01) but only to a level close to that achieved with radiotherapy alone. Addition of tamoxifen to radiotherapy failed to further increase the recurrence-free survival.

Opportunities for cancer research in a Health Maintenance Organization

The number of Americans enrolled in HMOs continues to rise from year to year. This phenomenon has resulted in major changes in the practice of medicine in this country. It also offers many opportunities for research, both in oncology and in other fields.

The value of bone marrow biopsy in breast cancer at time of diagnosis. A prospective study

Bone marrow biopsies (BMB) were performed in 173 consecutive unselected breast cancer patients at the time of diagnosis to define the value of this diagnostic tool in the initial staging of mammary carcinoma. In a group of 160 patients with a negative standard staging work-up, BMB was positive in two (1%). Both of them had negative x-ray but bone scan was positive in one and doubtful in the other. Bone marrow biopsy was positive in 31% of 13 additional patients with metastatic disease and in 44% of the nine among them with radiologically involved skeleton. These results exclude that BMB is able to discover micrometastatic foci of neoplastic disease. Its positivity appears strictly correlated with that of bone x-ray and scan. Based on the results of this prospective study, BMB is not required when both bone survey and scan are negative, but could be useful in clarifying diagnostic doubts of skeletal involvement.

Prospective evaluation of prognostic value of morphometry in patients with primary breast cancer

In a prospective study the predictive value of a multivariate morphometric prognostic index was evaluated in 195 patients with primary breast cancer who had not been treated with any form of chemotherapy or hormonal treatment. The presence or absence of distant tumour recurrence combined with the scores of the prognostic index were compared with the survival curves predicted in a previous study. The value of the presence of lymph node metastases, number of positive nodes, tumour size, mitotic activity index, and oestrogen receptor status in prediction of prognosis were also investigated. In agreement with the results of the previous retrospective study, the prospective use of the index had the strongest predictive prognostic value, followed by the mitotic activity index. Statistical analysis showed that the actual prognoses of 43 of the 195 patients (22%) were more accurately determined by the prognostic index rather than by using the presence of the lymph node metastases as the classifying variable. The prognostic index is consistently reproducible by different technicians; it is a reliable method of predicting distant recurrence of tumour and hence the prognosis of patients with primary breast carcinoma. It provides more prognostic information than the presence of lymph node metastases alone, and the index should be incorporated in routine pathology reports.

Local control and outcome of patients irradiated for isolated chest wall recurrences of breast cancer

Between January 1970 and December 1978, 149 breast cancer patients with isolated chest wall recurrences developing after initial curative treatment (mastectomy with or without postoperative irradiation) were referred to the University Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radiobiology of Vienna. Following radiotherapy, survival was analysed in 134 patients with regard to the amount of disease in the chest wall at the time of treatment and local tumour control. Patients with "subclinical" disease (after excision of solitary recurrences) had a median survival time of 55 and 50 months for controlled and uncontrolled disease in the entire chest wall, respectively. The corresponding survival times for patients with "macroscopic" chest wall disease was 36 and 25 months, respectively. Local tumour control within the irradiated field was 69% for patients with subclinical disease and 49% for patients with macroscopic tumour manifestation. Freedom from tumours in the entire chest wall could be achieved in 41% of patients with subclinical and 24% of patients with macroscopic disease. The 5-year survival rate for patients with subclinical disease, with tumour control in the entire chest wall is 53%. Of all 134 patients, 22% survived 5 years from the time of local recurrence.

Primary breast cancer. Complications of axillary management

The complications following surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in the management of the axilla in 187 patients with primary breast cancer treated between 1978 and 1982 have been studied. Although no difference in complication rate could be detected between the three different postoperative radiation schedules utilised there was a strong and positive correlation between complication rate and increasing extent of surgical intervention. When the groups were sub-divided according to the extent of surgery performed, no differences in regional recurrence rates were observed but complication rates (defined as significant lymphoedema of the arm and/or restriction of shoulder movements) were significantly different (p less than 0.001) at 30 months between those who had no surgical intervention (25%), those who had had 'sampling' performed (50%) and those who had had formal dissection performed (84%).

The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on the time of occurrence and prognosis of local recurrence in primary operable breast cancer

A retrospective study was conducted of all patients with an isolated locoregional recurrence of carcinoma of the breast after modified radical mastectomy was performed with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. The findings are summarized as follows: adjuvant radiation therapy delayed the appearance of local recurrence; there was no difference in the length of time to the diagnosis of distant dissemination between the irradiated and nonirradiated patients after the treatment of locoregional relapse. 35% of the irradiated patients and 25% of the nonirradiated patients remained clinically free of disease for relatively long periods after the treatment of locoregional relapse.

Adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer

The object of Ludwig III was to assess adjuvant therapy after total mastectomy and axillary clearance in postmenopausal women with breast cancer and axillary node metastases. Chemo-endocrine therapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, prednisone and tamoxifen: CMFp + T) was compared with endocrine therapy (prednisone and tamoxifen: p + T) and with no adjuvant treatment in 463 evaluable patients aged 65 years or less. Treatment results are available (Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group, Lancet i (1984) 1256-1260). Nodal status and receptor content of the primary were found to have prognostic value, while tumor size did not.

The response to further chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the breast who progressed while receiving adjuvant therapy

The effect of known chemotherapeutic programs in patients with breast cancer who developed metastasis during or after adjuvant chemotherapy with L-PAM plus 5-FU (PF) were studied. Thirteen patients failed while receiving adjuvant therapy at 3-22 months from the time therapy started. Three patients failed 6-28 months after 2 years of therapy. Thirteen patients received PF followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) at the time of progression on PF. Of these, ten received Adriamycin and vincristine (AV) at the time of progression on CMF. The response to CMF was 7%. No patient responded to AV after progression on CMF. Two of three patients treated with AV after failure on PF did respond, but both for only 6 months. This suggests that adjuvant therapy may render the tumor less responsive to further chemotherapy. Since most patients failed while on adjuvant therapy, this may indicate a poor prognosis regardless of the agents used.

Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer

In 1976 we began a randomized trial to evaluate breast conservation by a segmental mastectomy in the treatment of Stage I and II breast tumors less than or equal to 4 cm in size. The operation removes only sufficient tissue to ensure that margins of resected specimens are free of tumor. Women were randomly assigned to total mastectomy, segmental mastectomy alone, or segmental mastectomy followed by breast irradiation. All patients had axillary dissections, and patients with positive nodes received chemotherapy. Life-table estimates based on data from 1843 women indicated that treatment by segmental mastectomy, with or without breast irradiation, resulted in disease-free, distant-disease-free, and overall survival at five years that was no worse than that after total breast removal. In fact, disease-free survival after segmental mastectomy plus radiation was better than disease-free survival after total mastectomy (P = 0.04), and overall survival after segmental mastectomy, with or without radiation, was better than overall survival after total mastectomy (P = 0.07, and 0.06, respectively). A total of 92.3 per cent of women treated with radiation remained free of breast tumor at five years, as compared with 72.1 per cent of those receiving no radiation (P less than 0.001). Among patients with positive nodes 97.9 per cent of women treated with radiation and 63.8 per cent of those receiving no radiation remained tumor-free (P less than 0.001), although both groups received chemotherapy. We conclude that segmental mastectomy, followed by breast irradiation in all patients and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with positive nodes, is appropriate therapy for Stage I and II breast tumors less than or equal to 4 cm, provided that margins of resected specimens are free of tumor.

Patterns of metastasis and natural courses of breast carcinoma

Breast carcinoma is known to metastatize to all organs. In order to understand the patterns of spread and natural courses, this review summarizes detailed studies of patients with various stages of the disease. After treatment of early breast carcinoma (stage I, II, and some III), the recurrent lesion can be classified as local, regional, distant, or combinations thereof. The sites of dissemination of patients presenting with stage IV disease and of those who had autopsy after diagnosis of breast cancer are presented for comparison. Clinicopathological factors that influence the relative incidence, specific site, subsequent event, and prognosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancers are discussed.

Treatment of primary breast cancer with immunotherapy. Comparison with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy

For the first time, data on 78 breast cancer patients treated by modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant immunotherapy have been reported. Thirty-nine lymph node negative patients with uninvolved lymph nodes had a projected 5 year survival rate of 94 percent and 39 patients with involved nodes had a projected 5 year survival rate of 77 percent and a disease-free survival rate of 70 percent. Results have been presented according to UICC staging. The 100 percent survival rate of stage I patients has been compared with rates obtained by treatment of breast cancer with radiation therapy as the principal modality. The preliminary data are promising enough to warrant randomized, prospective trials with the other adjuvant modalities.

Role of surgery in the treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma

Twenty-eight patients with inflammatory carcinoma of the breast have been retrospectively reviewed. Overall 5 year survival was 25 percent. There was a trend toward improved survival in patients who received chemotherapy which did not achieve statistical significance. Sixteen patients underwent mastectomy as part of their treatment. These patients had a 48 percent 5 year survival which was significantly better than the survival in patients who did not undergo mastectomy. Furthermore, mastectomy resulted in better control of the local disease. Of 12 patients who did not undergo mastectomy, local control was initially obtained in only 2, and both of these patients suffered local recurrence within 1 year. Our data support the conclusion that mastectomy be combined with preoperative and postoperative multiagent cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of inflammatory carcinoma of the breast. More precise staging may permit better prognostic stratification of patients with this highly malignant cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: hope--reality--hazard?

According to a NIH Consensus-Development Statement, adjuvant polychemotherapy following mastectomy is considered beneficial to premenopausal patients with positive axillary nodes. Nevertheless, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in relation to menopausal status, axillary lymph node status, estrogen receptor status, choice and dose of agents, and long-term survival is not defined. Based on experimental background information and theoretical deductions, the clinical results have fallen short of expectations. The data of Bonadonna's CMF study reveal that the overall 5-year survival is increased by 4%; premenopausal patients benefit by 12% whereas treated postmenopausal patients have a 5% less chance of survival. Only those patients benefit who can tolerate a "full or nearly full dose"; these are only 17%. At this time it is not clear whether the small survival differences from adjuvant chemotherapy represent a real step forward in the fight against breast cancer. In the majority of patients (75 to 85%), at the time of adjuvant chemotherapy, systemically disseminated cancer cells are at mitotic rest or their proliferation is minimal. At this stage, adjuvant chemotherapy has no or little effect. Therefore, only a small proportion of patients (15 to 25%) has subclinical systemic cancer growth at the time of primary therapy or thereafter; only these patients have a chance to respond to chemotherapy. In view of this tumor kinetic problem and the hazards of chemotherapy, it seems advantageous (a) to focus on definition of patient subgroups at high risk for early recurrence post primary therapy to serve as participants in trials of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or (b) to concentrate on early diagnosis of recurrent disease for immediate institution of endocrine- and/or polychemotherapy.

Status of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

The clinical behavior of breast cancer in the human female is characterized by inconsistency. Without question, however, the clinical management of this disease in all stages has resulted in the improved quality and quantity of life. The histologic evidence of axillary lymph node involvement correlates well in a number of series with ultimate prognosis. The ability to characterize high-risk groups for recurrent disease set the stage for surgical adjuvant clinical trials in humans. As the chemotherapeutic management of advanced breast cancer patients improved as well, it seemed logical to attempt to treat patients with evidence of lymph node involvement with an adjuvant program in addition to surgical extirpation. The early results of a number of clinical trials in the surgical adjuvant setting has clearly shown that this concept was worth testing; a biologic effect has been observed with the most pronounced effect in younger women. Improved disease-free intervals occurred and ultimate survival seems to have been affected. The ultimate cure for the majority of females with operable but prognostically unfavorable breast cancer has not as yet been reached however. Thus, in an appropriately highly charged research atmosphere the "routine" management of this disease has as yet to be demonstrated.