Amifostine-mediated protection of normal bone marrow from cytotoxic chemotherapy

In-vivo and in vitro assessments of the radioprotective potential natural and chemical compounds: a review

PURPOSE

The study of the radioactive role of natural and chemical substances on human and animal studies has been the subject of research by some researchers. Therefore, the review of some of the past and current studies conducted in this field, can provide helpful information to elucidate of the importance of radioprotective components in reducing radiation exposure side effects.

METHODS

The authors search for keywords including In vitro, In vivo, Radioprotective, Ionizing radiation, and Vitamin in ScienceDirect, Scopus, Pubmed, and Google Scholar databases to access previously published articles and search for more reference articles on the role of radioprotective materials from natural and chemical compounds.

RESULTS

Radiation exposure can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body, however most of which are eliminated by the body's natural mechanisms, but when the body's antioxidant systems do not have enough ability to neutralize free radicals, oxidative stress occurs, which causes damage to DNA and body tissues. Therefore, it is necessary use of alternative substances that reduce and inhibit free radicals.

CONCLUSION

In general, recommended that antioxidant component(s) can be protect tissue damages in humans or animals, due to the their ability to scavenge free radicals generated by ionizing radiation.

The effect of amifostine on differentiation of the human megakaryoblastic Dami cell line

Amifostine is a cytoprotective drug that was initially used to control and treat nuclear radiation injury and is currently used to provide organ protection in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Clinical studies have also found that amifostine has some efficacy in the treatment of cytopenia caused by conditions such as myelodysplastic syndrome and immune thrombocytopenia, both of which involve megakaryocyte maturation defects. We hypothesized that amifostine induced the differentiation of megakaryocytes and investigated this by exposing the human Dami megakaryocyte leukemia cell line to amifostine (1 mmol/L). After 12 days of amifostine exposure, optical microscopy showed that the proportion of Dami cells with diameters >20 μm had increased to 24.63%. Transmission electron microscopy identified the development of a platelet demarcation membrane system, while flow cytometry detected increased CD41a expression and decreased CD33 expression on the Dami cell surface. Ploidy analysis found that the number of polyploid cells with >4N DNA content increased to 27.96%. We did not detect any elevation in the mRNA or protein levels of megakaryocytic differentiation-associated transcription factors GATA-binding factor 1 (GATA-1) and nuclear factor, erythroid 2 (NF-E2), but nuclear import assay revealed an increased nuclear translocation of these proteins. These findings indicate that amifostine induced the differentiation of Dami cells into mature megakaryocytes via a mechanism involving increased nuclear translocation of the transcription factors, NF-E2 and GATA-1.

Prevention of radiation-induced bone pathology through combined pharmacologic cytoprotection and angiogenic stimulation

Pathologic fractures and associated non-unions arising in previously irradiated bone are severely debilitating diseases. Although radiation is known to have deleterious effects on healthy tissue cellularity and vascularity, no clinically accepted pharmacologic interventions currently exist to target these destructive mechanisms within osseous tissues. We utilized amifostine-a cellular radioprotectant-and deferoxamine-an angiogenic stimulant-to simultaneously target the cellular and vascular niches within irradiated bone in a rat model of mandibular fracture repair following irradiation. Rats treated with combined therapy were compared to those undergoing treatment with singular amifostine or deferoxamine therapy, nontreated/irradiated animals (XFx) and non-treated/non-irradiated animals (Fx). 3D angiographic modeling, histology, Bone Mineral Density Distribution and mechanical metrics were utilized to assess therapeutic efficacy. We observed diminished metrics for all outcomes when comparing XFx to Fx alone, indicating the damaging effects of radiation. Across all outcomes, only the combined treatment group improved upon XFx levels, normalized all metrics to Fx levels, and was consistently as good as, or superior to the other treatment options (p<0.05). Collectively, our data demonstrate that pharmacologically targeting the cellular and vascular environments within irradiated bone prevents bone injury and enhances fracture healing.

Amifostine acts upon mitochondria to stimulate growth of bone marrow and regulate cytokines

Amifostine is a first-line cytoprotective drug used to prevent radiotherapy-induced or chemotherapy-induced injuries. However, its mechanism of action is not well understood. In this study, freshly harvested bone marrow cells were treated with amifostine and analyzed with a series of mitochondrial indices. In vitro results showed that bone marrow cells treated with amifostine 0.5 h before irradiation (0.5 Gy) experienced several benefits, as compared to vehicle controls, including (1) reduced reactive oxygen species levels, which reduced the production of free radicals; (2) better preservation of mitochondria, as indicated by MitoTracker-positive staining and the increased intensity of staining; (3) reduced apoptosis, as demonstrated by Annexin V staining; and (4) a better proliferation rate, as illustrated by MTT assay. Our in vitro studies showed that amifostine-treated mice exhibited (1) higher ATP production; (2) reduced plasma IL-2 levels, suppressing the immune response triggered by radiotoxicity; and (3) enhanced radiation-induced production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. All of these processes benefit recovery from radiation-induced damage.

Cytogenetic damage induced by radiotherapy. Evaluation of protection by amifostine and analysis of chromosome aberrations persistence

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cytogenetic damage induced by radiotherapy, the effect of concomitant amifostine and the persistence of translocations and dicentrics after the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples from 16 head and neck cancer patients were obtained at different times, just before treatment, at the 1st and 22nd sessions, at the end of radiotherapy, and one, four and 12 months later. Solid stain and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques were applied to analyse chromosome aberrations.

RESULTS

In all the analysis the frequencies of dicentrics plus rings were slightly lower in the group of patients receiving concomitant amifostine, but in each sampling point the differences were not significant. The persistence of translocations and dicentrics one year after radiotherapy was very similar, with a decline of more than 50%. For all the chromosome aberrations considered, a negative correlation between their initial yield and the percentage of this yield remained 12 months after radiotherapy was observed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

No significant protection by amifostine against radiation-induced chromosome damage was observed in head and neck cancer patients treated only with radiotherapy. In these cases, the persistence of translocations and dicentrics during the first year after radiotherapy is similar and related to their initial yield.

Amifostine protects rat kidneys during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate

PURPOSE

In peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, the kidneys are the major dose-limiting organs, because of tubular reabsorption and retention of radioactivity. Preventing renal uptake or toxicity will allow for higher tumour radiation doses. We tested the cytoprotective drug amifostine, which selectively protects healthy tissue during chemo- and radiotherapy, for its renoprotective capacities after PRRT with high-dose [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate.

METHODS

Male Lewis rats were injected with 278 or 555 MBq [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate to create renal damage and were followed up for 130 days. For renoprotection, rats received either amifostine or co-injection with lysine. Kidneys, blood and urine were collected for toxicity measurements. At 130 days after PRRT, a single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan was performed to quantify tubular uptake of (99m)Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), a measure of tubular function.

RESULTS

Treatment with 555 MBq [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate resulted in body weight loss, elevated creatinine and proteinuria. Amifostine and lysine treatment significantly prevented this rise in creatinine and the level of proteinuria, but did not improve the histological damage. In contrast, after 278 MBq [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate, creatinine values were slightly, but not significantly, elevated compared with the control rats. Proteinuria and histological damage were different from controls and were significantly improved by amifostine treatment. Quantification of (99m)Tc-DMSA SPECT scintigrams at 130 days after [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate therapy correlated well with 1/creatinine (r(2)=0.772, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Amifostine and lysine effectively decreased functional renal damage caused by high-dose [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate. Besides lysine, amifostine might be used in clinical PRRT as well as to maximise anti-tumour efficacy.

Effect of amifostine on the cytotoxicity of daunorubicin and daunoxome in tumor and normal cells

Anthracyclines are powerful cytotoxic agents, used as first-line treatment of leukemias and many other tumors, but host-tissue toxicity is their main dose-limiting factor. However, their therapeutic effects depend not only on the toxicity, hence on the dose, but also on drug resistance. Among the mechanisms that can account for cell sensitivity to anthracyclines, there is an overexpression of drug transport proteins, like the transmembrane P-glycoprotein (PGP), the multidrug- resistance-related protein (MRP) and the lung-resistance-related protein (LRP). Attempts to reduce the toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents without affecting their efficacy have been made using liposomal anthracyclines or cytoprotective agents, as Amifostine. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the toxic effects of Daunorubicin, in normal or liposomal formulation, used in combination with WR1065, the active metabolite of Amifostine, against normal and tumor cells. In conclusion these data show that the preincubation with WR-1065 does not inhibit the drug toxic effect on blast cells and on tumor cell lines, independently by their multidrug resistance phenotype, but has a cytoprotective effect on stem cells causing a drug cytotoxicity reduction of 10-20%. This advantage is even higher using the liposomal formulation of DNR. Therefore, Amifostine can offer a chance of protecting normal cells from the toxicity of anthracyclines, in normal or liposomal formulation. The combination of liposomal anthracyclines with Amifostine can confer further advantages in management of leukemic patients, especially the elderly where treatment toxicity is a main problem. These patients may be candidates for alternative therapeutic strategies and the combination of DNX and Amifostine is an attractive treatment for these cases where a low nonhematological toxicity is required.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine in advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response rate and progression free and overall survival of patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with paclitaxel, carboplatin and amifostine. To evaluate the toxicity of amifostine when used in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

METHODS

Forty-seven eligible patients (median age: 66; range 45-82) with bidimensionally measurable advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial cancer were treated with carboplatin (AUC = 6), paclitaxel (175 mg/M2) and amifostine (740 mg/M2) every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

There were 4 CRs (8%) (2 confirmed, 2 unconfirmed) and 15 PRs (32%) (9 confirmed, 6 unconfirmed) for a total response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 6-9 months) and a 6-month PFS rate of 64% (95% CI, 50% to 78%). The median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI, 12 to 17 months). Toxicity was tolerable. While 79% of patients developed Grade 3/4 neutropenia (30% Grade 3, 49% Grade 4), there were no episodes of Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and one episode of infection with grades 3-4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine was well reasonably tolerated in this cohort. The regimen demonstrated significant activity in endometrial cancer, comparable to other multi-agent chemotherapy programs in terms of response rate and survival, and with a favorable toxicity profile.

Time dependent protection of amifostine from renal and hematopoietic cisplatin induced toxicity

Efficacy of chemotherapy may be maximized and its toxicity can be minimized if drugs would be administered at specified daily times. The present study was aimed to examine if the protection of amifostine against cisplatin toxicity is time dependent. Amifostine is an organic thiophosphate that protects selectively normal tissues, but not tumors, against the cytotoxicity of DNA binding chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin. ICR male mice which were entrained to Light:Dark (L:D) 14:10 were injected (intrapritoneal bolus) for 5 consecutive days with either: cisplatin, cisplatin plus amifostine (administered 30 minutes prior to cisplatin). Injections were given at either 08:00, 13:00, 20:00 or 01:00. Five days later, on day 10, each set of mice was sacrificed (at the same hour corresponds to the injection hour), blood count, blood creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were assayed. Cisplatin treated mice exhibited nephrotoxicity, as indicated by increased blood urea nitrogen values and by high blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratios, as well as myelotoxicity that was indicated by low levels of hemoglobin and platelets. Co-administration of amifostine-cisplatin reversed both, the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin, and its myelosuppressive effects. For BUN, hemoglobin and platelets, maximal protections were observed at 08:00, (p <0.05, p <0.01 and p <0.01 respectively). For BUN/Cr ratio (p <0.05), maximal protections was observed at 13:00. These findings show that amifostine exhibits time dependent protection against cisplatin toxicity and thus it is recommended to use the protector when treatments are given during morning hours. The results also further validate the notion that chronochemotherapy is advantageous at least in reducing drug toxicity and thus should be integrated in the design of clinical protocols.

WR-1065, the active form of amifostine, protects HL-60 cells but not peripheral blood mononuclear cells from radiation and etoposide-induced apoptosis

PURPOSE

Developing myeloid cells are particularly sensitive to chemotherapy and ionizing radiation. Mature cells of the hematopoietic lineages, such as are found in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), are much less sensitive for reasons that are not yet understood. Protecting the myeloid precursors from radiation or chemotherapy is an important goal.

METHODS

We have used fluorescence microscopy to assess the ability of WR-1065, the active metabolite of amifostine (Ethyol), to protect cultured myeloid leukemic HL-60 cells or freshly isolated PBMCs from the induction of apoptosis by ionizing radiation or etoposide.

RESULTS

WR-1065 greatly reduced the percentage of radiation-induced apoptosis in the p53 negative HL-60 cells 24 h after exposure to 8 Gy. WR-1065 also greatly reduced the percentage of HL-60 cells undergoing apoptosis 24 h after a 1-h exposure to 1 microM etoposide. The pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD-fmk completely inhibited radiation-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells when present for the first hour after exposure to radiation, but had no effect on cell survival. In contrast, neither WR-1065 nor ZVAD-fmk reduced the level of radiation-induced apoptosis in normal human PBMCs.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pro-apoptotic pathways are present in immature myeloid cells that can be selectively protected from radiation or chemotherapy-induced apoptosis.

Myeloprotective Effects of Different Amifostine Regimens in Rabbits Undergoing High-Dose Treatment with 186Rhenium-(tin)1,1- Hydroxyethylidene Diphosphonate (186Re-HEDP)

The aim of this study is to investigate the myeloprotective effects of different amifostine regimens in rabbits undergoing high-dose treatment with 186Rhenium-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (186Re-HEDP) and to analyze the impact of amifostine on the bone uptake of the radiopharmaceutical. All animals were treated with 1000 MBq 186Re-HEDP. Group ReA received 500 mg amifostine prior to radionuclide therapy, group ReA3 received 3 x 200 mg amifostine 24 hours and 30 minutes prior to and 24 hours after radionuclide therapy. Group ReC served as control receiving no amifostine. Scintigrams were acquired to quantify the skeletal uptake of 186Re-HEDP, and platelet and leucocyte counts were measured. The mean decrease in platelets was 36% +/- 2%, 37% +/- 3%, and 61% +/- 5% for ReA, ReA3, and ReC, respectively. The decrease in ReC was significantly higher than in amifostine-treated animals with no difference between ReA and ReA3. For the leucocytes the mean decrease was 75% +/- 12%, 82% +/- 5%, and 73% +/- 4%, with no significant differences between the respective groups. Bone uptake of 186Re-HEDP was significantly reduced by 50% in ReA and ReA3 compared to ReC. Thus, the 3-day amifostine regimen had no advantage over the single dose regimen, with both regimens reducing bone uptake and yielding a platelet-protective but no leucoprotective effect.

Amifostine plus erythropoietin in a patient with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Increasingly, the therapeutic use of hematopoietic growth factors and immunomodulatory agents is under investigation in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Studies on amifostine therapy-alone or in combination with erythropoietin (EPO)-indicate that long-term treatment is possibly a decisive factor for therapy success. Therefore, we treated an 81-year-old female, transfusion-dependent patient with MDS and refractory anemia (RA) with amifostine and EPO over a period of 2 years. Following a 4-week induction phase of 5 x 500 mg amifostine plus 3 x 10000 IU EPO per week and maintenance therapy of 1 x 500 mg amifostine plus 3 x 10000 IU EPO per week, normal hemoglobin values were reached in week 14. A long-lasting erythroid response could be observed with a reduction of EPO to 2 x 10000 IU and 1 x 10000 IU and, at present, once a week application of amifostine alone (1 x 500 mg). Apart from the 1st week, the treatment was carried out at the outpatient department and was well tolerated by the patient. The patient experienced a good general clinical condition without further need for hospitalization or blood transfusions.

Efficacy of radioprotection in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition

It has been reported that radiotherapy-induced craniofacial deformities can occur in 66 to 100 percent of survivors of childhood head and neck cancers. Recent interest in the effectiveness of radioprotectors in the protection of normal tissue against radiation injury led us to investigate a possible role of radioprotection in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use the radioprotective agent amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721) as a probe to determine the effectiveness of radioprotection in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition after single-dose orthovoltage radiation to the infant rabbit orbital-zygomatic complex. Seven-week-old male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups (n = 10 each): group 1, 0 Gy (sham radiation); group 2, 35-Gy single-dose orthovoltage radiation; and group 3, 35-Gy single-dose orthovoltage radiation and amifostine (300 mg/kg intravenously, given 20 minutes before radiation). Serial radiographs and computed tomographic scans were obtained for cephalometric analysis, bone volume, and bone density measurements until skeletal maturity at 21 weeks. Significant (p < 0.05) reductions in orbital-zygomatic complex linear bone growth, bone volume, and bone density were observed after 35-Gy radiation compared with nonirradiated controls. No significant differences were noted between groups in cephalometric analysis of the nontreated (nonirradiated) left orbital-zygomatic complex, indicating no crossover effect from the radiation beam. However, pretreatment with amifostine, 20 minutes before 35-Gy radiation, resulted in significant (p < 0.05) preservation of linear bone growth, bone volume, and bone mineral density in the rabbit orbital-zygomatic complex compared with controls. This study demonstrated for the first time the effectiveness of a radioprotector in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition, and it paves the way for investigation into the pathogenic mechanism and prevention of radiotherapy-induced craniofacial deformities.

Effects of amifostine on the proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytic progenitor cells

This study investigated the effects of amifostine, a clinically usable radioprotector or chemoprotector, on the proliferation and differentiation of normal and X-irradiated cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34+) megakaryocytic progenitor cells (colony-forming unit in megakaryocytes, CFU-Meg) from human placental and umbilical cord blood (CB) in vitro. Amifostine significantly accelerated megakaryocyte colony formation in a plasma clot culture supplemented with recombinant human thrombopoietin because of an increase in immature CFU-Meg-derived large megakaryocyte colony formation. An analysis of the cells that were harvested from the culture showed that amifostine induced a 70- and an 83-fold increase in the total cell and CFU-Meg numbers, respectively, and produced hyperploid megakaryocytes of more than 8 N ploidy. The radioprotective effect of amifostine on the clonal growth of X-irradiated CD34+ CFU-Meg was observed by treatment before or after irradiation. These findings suggest that the action of amifostine extends from immature CFU-Meg to the terminal differentiation of megakaryopoiesis, and its radioprotective effect is shown in megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis.

A randomized phase II study of amifostine used as stem cell protectant in non-hodgkin lymphoma patients receiving cisplatin-based salvage chemotherapy prior to stem cell transplant

Stem cell mobilization may be inadequate in many lymphoma patients in need for autologous stem cell transplant (SCT). In this study, we sought to evaluate a potential role of amifostine as a stem cell chemoprotective agent in lymphoma patients receiving DHAP chemotherapy in preparation for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell transplant (SCT). In the beginning of the DHAP course, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive amifostine at 740 mg/m(2). Stem cells were mobilized with GCSF after the last cycle of DHAP. Stem cell collection started upon ANC recovery over 1000/mm(3). Standard 10 lt. apheresis daily with a goal of a minimum of 2 x 10(6) stem cells/kg were performed. Twenty-one patients have been enrolled; 10 received amifostine pretreatment (age, 20-64) and 11 were randomized to the control arm (age, 18-63). Prior chemotherapy was balanced in the two groups. The median number of DHAP treatments for each group was 2. Amifostine was well tolerated and was associated with higher stem cell collection. Toxicity and time to engraftment were comparable between the two groups. Our preliminary results may suggest a role of amifostine in protecting stem cells during salvage chemotherapy, thus facilitating stem cell collection.

Phase I trial of a twice-daily regimen of amifostine with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide chemotherapy in children with refractory carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Amifostine protects normal tissues against chemotherapy and radiation-induced toxicity without loss of antitumor effects. Evidence suggests that multiple daily doses of amifostine may improve its cytoprotective effects. The purpose of this study was to assess the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of twice-daily doses of amifostine with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy for children with refractory malignancies and to determine the pharmacokinetic properties of amifostine, WR-1065, and the disulfide metabolites of amifostine.

METHODS

Patients with refractory malignancies were treated with amifostine 15 minutes before and 2 hours after chemotherapy with ifosfamide (3 g/m(2) per dose on Days 1 and 2) and carboplatin (635 mg/m(2) on Day 3). Etoposide was administered on Days 1 and 2 (150 mg/m(2)). The starting dose of amifostine was 740 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic studies were performed after the first dose of amifostine.

RESULTS

Twelve patients received 23 courses of ICE and amifostine. Dose-limiting toxicities for amifostine at 740 mg/m(2) were somnolence and anxiety. The other Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included asymptomatic, reversible hypocalcemia, vomiting, and reversible hypotension. At a dose of 600 mg/m(2), amifostine was well tolerated. Hypocalcemia, due to rapid, transient suppression of parathyroid hormone production, required close monitoring and aggressive intravenous calcium supplementation. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed high interpatient variability with rapid plasma clearance of amifostine and WR-1065. The median elimination half-life of amifostine (9.3 minutes) and WR-1065 (15 minutes) was much shorter than the disulfide metabolites (74.4 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended pediatric dose of amifostine for a twice-daily regimen is 600 mg/m(2) per dose (1200 mg/m(2)/day) with DLTs of anxiety and somnolence, lower than the previously recommended single dose of 1650 mg/m(2).

Treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with amifostine

The efficacy and toxicity of amifostine (300 mg/m(2) three times a week for three consecutive weeks for a maximum of six courses) was evaluated in 12 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes. Dose escalation up to 400 mg/m(2) was allowed to patients who failed to respond. Hemoglobin concentration was increased > or = 1.5 g/dl in two (18%) of the 11 anemic patients. These two patients obtained transfusion independence for 20 weeks. Reticulocyte counts and ANC increased > or = 50% of baseline in four (44%) of the nine patients with reticulocytopenia and in three (25%) of the 12 neutropenic patients. Platelet count increased in three (50%) of the six patients with thrombocytopenia. Progenitor growth of CFU-GMs and BFU-Es improved in 8/12 patients. No major side effects were observed. In conclusion amifostine is well tolerated and can promote the growth of primitive hematopoietic progenitors and ameliorate the cytopenias in MDS patients.

WR-2721: inhibitor of cisplatin-induced micronuclei

The modulatory effect of S-2-/3-aminopropylamino/ethyl-phosphorothioic acid, (WR-2721, Amifostine) on induction of micronuclei by cis-diamminedichloroplatinum[II] (CDDP) was studied. The adult, male Swiss mice were treated with WR-2721, at a dose of 200 mg/kg or 400 mg/kg body weight, and/or with CDDP, at a dose 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg body weight. WR-2721 was given alone or 30 min before CDDP administration. The frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) and also the number of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, at 24 h after the drug application, were determined. After administration of CDDP, the frequency of MNPCEs distinctly increased, and the number of PCEs decreased. As compared with the animals injected with CDDP only, in mice treated with WR-2721 before CDDP application, the number of MNPCEs was reduced and the frequency of PCEs was increased. However, WR-2721 given alone, without subsequent administration of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum[II], caused an increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes and a decrease in the number of PCEs. The geno- and cyto-toxicity and chemoprotection were dependent on the doses of the agents WR-2721 and CDDP applied. In mice injected with CDDP and/or WR-2721, the patterns of changes in the frequency of MNPCEs and PCEs were similar in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, respectively. The protective effect of the aminothiol compound WR-2721 against induction of micronuclei and apoptotic cell death in the erythropoietic system by CDDP was shown.

Bone marrow stem cell protection from chemotherapy by low--molecular-weight compounds

The stem cells of the bone marrow have the capacity for both self-renewal and derivation of all the blood cell lineages. Consequently, toxicity to these cells can result in neutropenia, agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, or aplastic anemia. Many anticancer drugs adversely affect the bone marrow, and neutropenia is a common limiting factor in dose escalation. In this review, we discuss agents that appear to have potential as bone marrow sparing agents. Computerized catalogs of the National Library of Medicine and Medline were searched for reports on low-molecular-weight compounds that detailed effects on the hematopoietic progenitor cells. The most promising agents are the endogenous peptides p-glutamic acid-glutamic acid-aspartic acid-cysteine-lysine and acetyl-serine-aspartic acid-lysine-proline, and the exogenous compounds amifostine and ammonium trichloro[dioxoethylene-O,O']tellurate, but several others are also discussed. These compounds preserve stem cell function in the presence of antineoplastic drugs of diverse pharmacological classes, and they do so by various mechanisms of action. Their present status in clinical practice is also detailed. More needs to be learned about their mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential, but the results are encouraging for some of these compounds and more clinical trials should be expected.

Bone marrow purging by photodynamic treatment in children with acute leukemia: cytoprotective action of amifostine

In order to evaluate the combined effect of Amifostine and Merocyanine 540 during photoirradiation in neoplastic cells, bone marrow cells from children with acute leukemia (AL), age-matched controls as well as HL-60 cell line were studied. Cell suspensions were incubated with Amifostine, then with MC 540 and they were subsequently exposed to different irradiation doses by Argon Laser 514 nm. Cell survival was estimated by trypan blue supravital stain following a 24-h incubation. The leukemic cell line was studied in continuous liquid cell cultures for 4 weeks. The survival of normal bone marrow progenitors has been estimated by colony formation assay in methylcellulose cultures. Our results showed that Amifostine enhances the photokilling effect of MC 540 on leukemic cells and significantly protects bone marrow nucleated and committed progenitors (BFU-E and CFU-GM) from children with AL under chemotherapy. In conclusion, Amifostine seems to be a promising cytoprotective agent in the clinical use of purging with MC 540 mediated phototherapy.

Phase I/II dose escalation study of docetaxel and carboplatin combination supported with amifostine and GM-CSF in patients with incomplete response following docetaxel chemo-radiotherapy: additional chemotherapy enhances regression of residual cancer

Taxanes have been shown to interact with anti-apoptotic proteins. In the present study we investigated whether the addition of taxane in combination with DNA damaging drugs can further enhance tumor shrinkage in cases with incomplete response to radiotherapy. Since the dose of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin is not known, the above hypothesis was tested in the context of a dose escalation phase I study. Twenty-eight patients with locally advanced chest or pelvic tumors, showing residual disease on CT scans performed 40 d following docetaxel radio-chemotherapy, were recruited in a dose escalation protocol of docetaxel/carboplatin supported with amifostine and GM-CSF. The starting dose of docetaxel was 40 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula and was escalated in cohorts of 4 patients (starting dose AUC2 every two weeks; AUC0.5 increments up to AUC3). Thereafter the docetaxel dose was increased to 50 and 60 mg/m2, while carboplatin was escalated (by AUC0.5 increments) starting from AUC3 and AUC4 respectively. Amifostine (600 mg/m2) was administered i.v. before carboplatin and GM-CSF (480 microg) was injected s.c. on days 5, 6 and 10, 11 of each cycle. Six cycles were given and response was assessed 2 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. None out of four patients treated in the 6th dose level cohort (50 mg/m2 of docetaxel and AUC4 of carboplatin every 2 weeks) showed any grade 2-4 hematologic toxicity. Mild non-hematologic toxicity such as neuropathy, leg edema, pleural effusion, pyrexia, alopecia grade 2 and hypersensitivity was observed in 4-12% of patients. Out of four patients treated in a 7th cohort (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC4), one developed grade IV neutropenia and two developed grade 3 severe asthenia requiring treatment delay for 2 weeks. Out of 11 patients with PR following docetaxel radio-chemotherapy, 7 (63%) showed CR after docetaxel/carboplatin additional chemotherapy. Eight out of 17 patients with MR following docetaxel radio-chemotherapy showed PR (47%) and one showed CR (6%) after additional chemotherapy. High dose combined docetaxel (50 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC4) chemotherapy can be safely administered on a two-weekly basis if supported with amifostine and GM-CSF. Such an additional therapy may be important in patients with incomplete response after chemo-RT. Broad spectrum cytoprotection with amifostine and GM-CSF may also contribute to the reduction of incidence of neurosensory reactions and asthenia in patients treated with taxanes.

Purging of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral autografts in acute leukemia with mafosfamide and amifostine to protect normal progenitor cells

In the present study the in vitro growth of CFU-GM from PBPC of patients with AML (n = 11), purged with mafosfamide alone or a combination of mafosfamide and amifostine, was compared to historical controls of mafosfamide-purged bone marrow (AML CR1, n = 16). Two patients were transplanted with mafosfamide and mafosfamide/amifostine pretreated PBPC autografts. The in vitro experiments demonstrated a significantly higher resistance of peripheral blood derived CFU-GM to mafosfamide (median ID95 190 microg mafosfamide/ml) compared with bone marrow derived CFU-GM (median ID95130 microg/ml). Preincubation with amifostine significantly further increased the median ID95 to 245 microg/ml. The clinical results showed short recovery times for neutrophils >500/microl (9 and 13 days) and platelets >20 000/microl (12 and 21 days) and stable long-term engraftment with one relapse at day +118 and one patient in CR at day 760 after transplantation. The in vitro results show a significant advantage of PBPC over bone marrow-derived progenitors for purging with mafosfamide. Furthermore, a protective effect from mafosfamide of amifostine on normal progenitors could be demonstrated. The clinical results demonstrate the clinical feasibility of using mafosfamide-purged autologous PBPCT without impairing the short-term and long-term repopulating capacities of the autografts.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants

PURPOSE

Because toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can adversely affect short- and long-term patient quality of life, can limit the dose and duration of treatment, and may be life-threatening, specific agents designed to ameliorate or eliminate certain chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicities have been developed. Variability in interpretation of the available data pertaining to the efficacy of the three United States Food and Drug Administration-approved agents that have potential chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-protectant activity-dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine-and questions about the role of these protectant agents in cancer care led to concern about the appropriate use of these agents. The American Society of Clinical Oncology sought to establish evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines for the use of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine in patients who are not enrolled on clinical treatment trials.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed the clinical data regarding the activity of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine. A computerized literature search was performed using MEDLINE. In addition to reports collected by individual Panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from June 1997 through December 1998 were collected for review by the Panel chairpersons, and appropriate articles were distributed to the entire Panel for review. Guidelines for use, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were reviewed and approved by the Panel. Outcomes considered in evaluating the benefit of a chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-protectant agent included amelioration of short- and long-term chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related toxicities, risk of tumor protection by the agent, toxicity of the protectant agent itself, quality of life, and economic impact. To the extent that these data were available, the Panel placed the greatest value on lesser toxicity that did not carry a concomitant risk of tumor protection.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Mesna: (1) Mesna, dosed as detailed in these guidelines, is recommended to decrease the incidence of standard-dose ifosfamide-associated urothelial toxicity. (2) There is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of mesna to prevent urothelial toxicity with ifosfamide doses that exceed 2.5 g/m(2)/d. (3) Either mesna or forced saline diuresis is recommended to decrease the incidence of urothelial toxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide use in the stem-cell transplantation setting. Dexrazoxane: (1) The use of dexrazoxane is not routinely recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive initial doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. (2) The use of dexrazoxane may be considered for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received a cumulative dosage of 300 mg/m(2) or greater of doxorubicin in the metastatic setting and who may benefit from continued doxorubicin-containing therapy. (3) The use of dexrazoxane in the adjuvant setting is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. (4) The use of dexrazoxane can be considered in adult patients who have received more than 300 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin-based therapy for tumors other than breast cancer, although caution should be used in settings in which doxorubicin-based therapy has been shown to improve survival because of concerns of tumor protection by dexrazoxane. (5) There is insufficient evidence to make a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in the treatment of pediatric malignancies, with epirubicin-based regimens, or with high-dose anthracycline-containing regimens. Similarly, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in patients with cardiac risk factors or underlying cardiac disease. (6) Patients receiving dexrazoxane should continue to be monitored for cardiac toxicity. Amifostine: (1) Amifostine may be considered for the reduction of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoth

Double-blind randomized study on the myeloprotective effect of melatonin in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in advanced lung cancer

A significant myeloprotective effect of melatonin in mice treated with etoposide, cyclophosphamide or carboplatin has been reported. The present study was designed to evaluate if the same effect could be observed in patients receiving chemotherapy. Twenty previously untreated patients with inoperable lung cancer received two cycles of carboplatin (given at area under the curve 5 by the Calvert formula) on day 1 and etoposide (150 mg m(-2) i.v.) on days 1-3 every 4 weeks. Melatonin 40 mg or placebo (double-blind) was given orally in the evening for 21 consecutive days, starting 2 days before chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive melatonin either with the first or the second cycle. Complete blood cell count with differential was done three times per week for 3 weeks. The median age of the cohort was 60 years (range 42-69), 16 patients had non-small cell and four patients small-cell lung cancer, 12 stage III and eight stage IV disease. In a multivariate analysis including age, sex, diagnosis, stage, performance status, doses of carboplatin and etoposide, and concomitant treatment with melatonin or placebo, the haematological parameters--depth and duration of toxicity for haemoglobin, platelets and neutrophils (ANC)--were not significantly different between cycles with/without melatonin. The mean ANC nadir and the mean number of days with ANC < 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) were 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) and 2.5 days, respectively, with/without melatonin. We concluded that, in patients with lung cancer, melatonin given orally at a dose of 40 mg per day for 21 days in the evening, does not protect against the myelotoxic effect of carboplatin and etoposide.

Cisplatin, radiation, and amifostine in carcinoma of the uterine cervix

A pilot, open, comparative study was performed on patients with locally advanced cervical cancer to investigate the efficacy and safety of amifostine. Twenty patients with a histologic diagnosis of squamous cervical cancer were treated with radiotherapy and randomized in two groups. Group A received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 for five days in two cycles during intracavitary radiotherapy and 100 mg/m2 x 2 cycles during external radiotherapy, and amifostine 825 mg/m2 15 min before the cisplatin infusion. Patients in group B received cisplatin in the same doses without amifostine. All patients had complete responses during a median follow-up of 20 months. Grade three neutropenia was present in two patients in group A and in four of the control group, P = 0.31; grade 2 neurologic toxicity was seen in four patients in group B and in one of the patients in group A, P = 0.15. One patient needed temporary interruption of amifostine due to hypotension. Eight of 10 patients in group A developed hypocalcemia during the treatment with amifostine. Our findings indicate that amifostine was well tolerated. In this series a mild neurologic and hematologic protection was found in patients that received amifostine, although this was not statistically significant. No differences in disease-free survival response and overall survival was seen between the two groups.

Amifostine protects normal tissues from paclitaxel toxicity while cytotoxicity against tumour cells is maintained

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the protective effects of amifostine against paclitaxel-induced toxicity to normal and malignant human tissues. Haematopoietic progenitor colony assays were used to establish the number of CFU-GEMM and BFU-E colonies after incubation with WR-1065 alone, Amifostine alone, paclitaxel (2.5 or 5 microM) +/- WR-1065 or amifostine. MTT and alkaline elution assays evaluated the in vitro growth inhibitory and DNA damaging effects, respectively, of paclitaxel with or without amifostine against normal human fibroblasts and human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. This combination was also evaluated in vivo using severe combined immune deficient (scid) mouse models of early (non-palpable tumours) and advanced (palpable tumours) human ovarian cancer. Human 2780 ovarian cancer cells were inoculated subcutaneously while paclitaxel and amifostine were administered intraperitoneally. A brief exposure (15 min) to amifostine not only protected human haematopoietic progenitor colonies from paclitaxel toxicity, but stimulated the growth of CFU-GEMM and BFU-E beyond control values. Amifostine protected normal human lung fibroblasts from paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity and DNA single-strand breaks. However, paclitaxel cytotoxicity and DNA single-strand breaks were actually enhanced by pretreatment with amifostine in the NSCLC model. Importantly, amifostine did not interfere with paclitaxel antitumour activity even with prolonged exposure (24.5 h) of the lung cancer cells to high concentrations (1.2 mM) in vitro or following five repetitive high doses (200 mg/kg) given to scid mice with human ovarian cancer xenografts. Indeed, under certain circumstances, amifostine resulted in sensitisation of tumour cells to paclitaxel. Our results confirm previous reports of the ability of amifostine to protect normal tissues from the toxic effects of chemotherapy drugs and now extend these observations to paclitaxel.

[Chemoprotectors. Mechanisms of action and clinical applications]

Toxicity of chemotherapy remains an important point in the care of patients with malignancies. Since a few years, new compounds without any intrinsic anti tumoral activity have been developed to decrease the toxicity or to enhance the activity of anti-cancer drugs. From those used against the toxic activity of anti-cancer drugs, two classes could be isolated: the chemoprotectors that interact through a specific of chemotherapy in normal cells, and the chemocorrectors that enhance the spontaneous recovery after exposition to cytotoxic drugs. The most widely used chemoprotector remains the 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) which protects against the bladder toxicity of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide. However, two new drugs, amifostine and dextrazoxane have been recently or will be approved in France against the toxicity of cisplatin and anthracyclines, respectively. Mechanism of action and clinical applications of these new drugs in cancer chemotherapy are reviewed.

Incidence and prevention of nonhaematological toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy

The introduction of the haematopoietic growth factors (HGFs), together with the evolution of techniques to harvest haematopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood, have greatly facilitated the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). While haematological toxicity of HDC is no longer dose-limiting, damage to other tissues has become more pronounced. In fact, nonhaematological toxicity (NHTOX) is now often dose-limiting in HDC regimens. NHTOX associated with HDC regimens depends on the type and dose of the drugs used, the physical condition and the characteristics of the patients treated and the given comedication. We describe the most important toxic effects of commonly used HDC programmes, such as nausea, vomiting, and mucositis, neutropaenic fever and sepsis, various major organ toxicities, catheter-associated problems and long-term complications. In addition, we discuss the possibilities of preventing these side-effects and what action to take if they occur.

The need for cytoprotection

The toxicity associated with chemotherapy is significant and dose limiting. Multiple organ systems can be affected, with both acute and chronic side effects producing adverse effects. The concept of cytoprotection, or the selective protection of normal tissues is a strategy now being investigated in preclinical and clinical models. Systemic approaches have included the use of compounds such as sodium thiosulphate, diethyldithiocarbamate and amifostine. The most promising results have been obtained with the organic thiophosphate compound amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721).

Carboplatin combined with amifostine, a bone marrow protectant, in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised phase II study

Amifostine (WR-2721), a thiol compound, has been shown to protect normal tissue from alkylating agents and cisplatin-induced toxicity without loss of anti-tumour effects. To confirm this result, we conducted a phase II randomised trial to determine if the addition of amifostine reduces the toxicity of carboplatin without loss of anti-tumour activity in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After the first course of carboplatin (600 mg m-2 i.v. infusion), 21 patients were randomised to receive three cycles of carboplatin alone (C arm) or three infusions of amifostine at 910 mg m-2 (CA arm) at 28 day intervals. The amifostine was given 20 min before and at 2 and 4 h after carboplatin. Since the 910 mg m-2 amifostine infusion led to hypotension in six patients, the dosage was reduced by 25%, to 683 mg m-2 t.i.d., in the other four patients. Amifostine was well tolerated at this dose level. Five patients in the CA arm and three in the C arm had their planned treatment discontinued owing to progressive disease (n = 3), amifostine side-effects (hypotension, sneezing and sickness, n = 4), and carboplatin-induced thrombocytopenia (n = 1). Bone marrow and renal function at study entry and after the first course of carboplatin before randomisation were similar in both treatment arms. Twenty courses of carboplatin+amifostine have been compared with 25 courses of carboplatin alone. Although there was no statistically significant difference with respect to haematological values comparing both arms, the median time to platelet recovery (> 100 x 10(9) l-1) (13.5 days vs 21 days; P = 0.04) and the need for hospitalisation for i.v. antibiotic and other supportive treatment tended to be reduced in the CA arm (0/20 vs 6/25 patient courses; P = 0.06). Response rates and median survival (14 vs 9 months) were no different, excluding tumour protection activity by amifostine. These results with a small number of patients suggest that amifostine given with carboplatin may reduce the duration of thrombocytopenia and hospitalisation.

Suppressing effect of WR-2721 on micronuclei induced by cyclophosphamide in mice

The effect of WR-2721 against cyclophosphamide-induced clastogenicity was studied using the in vivo micronucleus assay. The frequency of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes in the peripheral blood of mice treated with WR-2721 and cyclophosphamide (CP), each of the compounds at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight, was evaluated during the 15-day period. The suppressing effect of WR-2721, given 30 min prior to cyclophosphamide administration, on micronuclei induced by the alkylating agent was demonstrated. The number of micronuclei was increased on day 1 after CP application and declined thereafter with the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes remaining lower in WR-2721 pre-treated mice. The modulatory effect of WR-2721 on the clastogenic activity of cyclophosphamide in the erythropoietic system by the mouse micronucleus test was shown.

Cytoprotection: concepts and challenges

Clinical trials with several toxicity protectors (cytoprotective or chemoprotective agents) have been performed during the past decade. These trials are quite complex since they must include sufficient dose-limiting events for study, and assessment of both toxicity (and therefore the efficacy of protection) and antitumor effects must be carried out. However, it is inevitable that with greater understanding of drug actions, one seeks to manipulate these for greater antitumor activity (biochemical modulation) or for lesser dose-limiting toxicity (cytoprotection) or for both. Examples of cytoprotective agents include dexrazoxane (ICRF-187), protecting against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity, and amifostine protecting against the myelosuppression of platinum and alkylating agents. In spite of the challenges encountered in the clinical development of these drugs, studies of cytoprotectors have led to a considerable understanding of important therapeutic issues and tangible clinical benefit in specific clinical situations.