Preoperative induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx

The impact of induction and/or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on acute and late patient-reported symptoms in oropharyngeal cancer: Application of a mixed-model analysis of a prospective observational cohort registry

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to comprehensively investigate the association of chemotherapy with trajectories of acute symptom development and late symptom recovery in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) by comparing symptom burden between induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ICRT), concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy (CRT), or radiotherapy (RT) alone.

METHODS

Among a registry of 717 patients with OPC, the 28‐item patient‐reported MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck Module (MDASI‐HN) symptoms were collected prospectively at baseline, weekly during RT, and 1.5, 3 to 6, 12, and 18 to 24 months after RT. The effect of the treatment regimen (ICRT, CRT, and RT alone) was examined with mixed‐model analyses for the acute and late period. In the CRT cohort, the chemotherapy agent relationship with symptoms was investigated.

RESULTS

Chemoradiation (ICRT/CRT) compared with RT alone resulted in significantly higher acute symptom scores in the majority of MDASI‐HN symptoms (ie, 21 out of 28). No late symptom differences between treatment with or without chemotherapy were observed that were not attributable to ICRT. Nausea was lower for CRT with carboplatin than for CRT with cisplatin; cetuximab was associated with particularly higher scores for acute and late skin, mucositis, and 6 other symptoms. The addition of ICRT compared with CRT or RT alone was associated with a significant increase in numbness and shortness of breath.

CONCLUSION

The addition of chemotherapy to definitive RT for OPC patients was associated with significantly worse acute symptom outcomes compared with RT alone, which seems to attenuate in the late posttreatment period. Moreover, induction chemotherapy was specifically associated with worse numbness and shortness of breath during and after treatment.

LAY SUMMARY

Chemotherapy is frequently used in addition to radiotherapy cancer treatment, yet the (added) effect on treatment‐induced over time is not comprehensively investigated

This study shows that chemotherapy adds to the symptom severity reported by patients, especially during treatment

Induction/concurrent chemotherapy significantly augments patient‐reported symptom burden of radiotherapy among patients with oropharyngeal cancer, as worse acute symptom outcomes are observed compared with radiotherapy alone. Induction chemotherapy is associated with greater numbness and shortness of breath during and after treatment.

Prognostic impact of pathological complete remission after preoperative irradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: re-analysis of a phase 3 clinical study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the associations between pathological complete remission (pCR) and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who received preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in a phase 3 clinical study.

METHODS

A total of 222 newly diagnostic stage III/IVM0 HNSCC patients were randomly assigned to a preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (n = 104) or preoperative radiotherapy alone group (n = 118). Over a mean follow-up of 59 months, 72 patients were defined as non-responders to preoperative therapy and subsequently underwent resection of the primary lesion with or without neck dissection. The relationship between the pathological tumor response of the primary lesion and treatment prognosis was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of pCR on local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

RESULTS

Among the 72 non-responders, 25 patients, 10 in the chemotherapy group and 15 in the radiotherapy group, achieved pCR. The 5-year LC, OS, PFS, and DMFS of pCR patients and non-pCR patients were 93.2% vs. 67.7% (p = 0.007), 83.3% vs. 39.7% (p = 0.0006), 76.1% vs. 44.0% (p = 0.009), and 90.4% vs. 56.3% (p = 0.005), respectively. In multivariate analysis, pCR is also an independent prognostic factor in prognosis, with statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

pCR after preoperative radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a good prognostic factor in locally advanced HNSCC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Number:ChiCTR-TRC-114004322 Date:05 Mar, 2014.

Phase III randomized trial of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

To determine the role of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

A total of 222 patients with stage III/IVA-B HNSCC were randomly assigned to receive preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (Pre-S CRT, weekly cisplatin 30mg/m²) or preoperative radiotherapy alone (Pre-S RT). Survival analysis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.

Results

With a medial follow-up of 59 month, the 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of Pre-S CRT v Pre-S RT group were 53.8% v 39.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74, 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.10, P = 0.13), 53.2% v 38.7%, (HR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.01, P =0.06), and 80.4% v 68.1% (HR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.98, P = 0.04), respectively. In patients with larynx-hypopharynx primaries, the 5-year OS, PFS and DMFS of Pre-S CRT v Pre-S RT were 62.7% v 38.8% (HR, 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.02, P = 0.054), 63.1% v 39.9% (HR, 0.52; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.89, P = 0.03) and 86.2% v 63.3% (HR, 0.35, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.82, P = 0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

The addition of weekly cisplatin concurrent to preoperative RT does not improve OS, but improve DMFS in locally advanced HNSCC. However, in a subset of patients with the larynx-hypopharynx primaries, preoperative chemoradiotherapy has significantly improved PFS and DMFS, and has also provided a borderline benefit in OS in comparison with preoperative radiotherapy alone.

Clinicopathological evaluation of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 as a treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

The administration of pre-operative chemotherapy with S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy at a total dose of 30 Gy was clinicopathologically evaluated as a treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the present study. The participants comprised 81 patients with OSCC, consisting of 29 patients with stage II disease, 12 patients with stage III disease and 40 patients with stage IV disease. All patients received a total radiation dose of 30 Gy in daily fractions of 2 Gy, 5 times a week, for 3 weeks, and the patients were concurrently administered S-1 at a dose of 80-120 mg, twice daily, over 4 consecutive weeks. Radical surgery was performed in all cases at 2-6 weeks subsequent to the end of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy. The most common adverse event was oropharyngeal mucositis, but this was transient in all patients. No severe hematological or non-hematological toxicities were observed. The clinical and histopathological response rates were 70.4 and 75.3%, respectively. Post-operatively, local failure developed in 6 patients (7.4%) and neck failure developed in 2 patients (2.5%). Distant metastases were found in 7 patients (8.6%). The overall survival rate, disease-specific survival rate and locoregional control rate at 5 years were 87.7, 89.9 and 90.6%, respectively. Locoregional recurrence occurred more frequently in patients that demonstrated a poor histopathological response compared with patients that demonstrated a good response (P<0.01). These results indicate that pre-operative S-1 chemotherapy with radiotherapy at a total dose of 30 Gy is feasible and effective for patients with locally advanced OSCC, and that little or no histopathological response may be a risk factor for locoregional recurrence in this treatment.

Definitive chemoradiation for primary oral cavity carcinoma: A single institution experience

OBJECTIVES

While surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is the standard of care for oral cavity cancer (OCC), a select group requires nonsurgical treatment. We provide a single-institution experience using definitive chemotherapy and RT for primary OCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 73 patients with previously untreated, non-metastatic primary OCC treated definitively from 1990 to 2011. There were 39 male and 34 female, with a median age of 63 years (range, 35-89). The disease distribution was Stage I and II (7% each), Stage III (14%), and Stage IV (73%). Oral tongue was the most common (48%), followed by floor of mouth (19%), retromolar trigone (13.7%), and others (8.2%). Median tumor dose was 70 Gy. Sixty-two percent of patients (n=45) were treated with concurrent chemotherapy, predominantly platinum-based.

RESULTS

Median follow-up among surviving patients was 73.1 months (interquartile range 14.2-81.4 months). Actuarial 5-year overall survival was 15%. Incidences of locoregional and distant failures were 41.1% and 20.5%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year rates of locoregional control and freedom from distant metastasis were 37% and 70%, respectively. Mucositis was the most common ⩾Grade 3 acute toxicity (49%). Incidences of Grade 3 late dysphagia and trismus were 15% and 13%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates over 20 years of experience using definitive chemoradiation for OCC at our institution. Our results illustrate the challenges in treating patients with advanced disease who are not surgical candidates, and the need for adequate and early treatment to prevent distant disease and improve survival outcomes.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare survival and functional outcomes in patients with advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with either surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Patients treated with curative intent by either surgery + RT or concurrent CRT were identified over a 6-year period (2001-2007). Disease and functional outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients underwent surgical excision and received postoperative RT. Fifty patients underwent concurrent CRT. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly higher in the surgically treated group (p < .001). Long-term enteral feeding tube support was more commonly required in those treated with CRT, whereas osteoradionecrosis rates were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment by surgery + adjuvant RT for advanced oral cavity SCC resulted in better disease control than treatment with CRT. This supports traditional surgical treatment algorithms for oral cavity cancer.

Multicenter phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

We evaluated whether preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy is feasible and efficacious in the treatment of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Participants comprised 39 patients with oral carcinoma (stage III, n = 15; stage IVA, n = 24). All patients received a total radiation dose of 40 Gy, in once-daily 2-Gy fractions, and received S-1 at 65 mg/m²/day for 5 consecutive days, over 4 consecutive weeks with concurrent radiotherapy.

Results

Hematological toxicity was mild and reversible. The most common non-hematological toxicity was grade 3 mucositis, but this was transient and tolerable. Radical surgery was performed for 37 patients, with the remaining 2 patients declining the surgery. Postoperatively, local failure developed in 1 patient, and neck failure in 2 patients. Distant metastases were identified in 4 patients. At a median follow-up of 38.0 months (range 23–88 months), locoregional control, disease-specific survival, and overall survival rates at 3 years were 91.5, 83.8, and 83.8 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Concurrent administration of S-1 and radiotherapy combined with surgery offers a well-tolerated method of successfully treating advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. The locoregional control rate remains high even at 3 years of follow-up, and no serious adverse effects have been encountered.

Podoplanin expression predicts prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

Despite new therapeutic approaches patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma still have a dismal prognosis. The main factor contributing to this problem is locoregional failure due to a lack of response to treatment. Several trials have proven the effect of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery in comparison to primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy. No reliable parameters have been identified so far to predict response to radiochemotherapy. The aim of our study was to assess whether podoplanin expression in pretreatment biopsies could serve as a biomarker to predict the host response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. In this retrospective study, podoplanin expression was examined in a set of 63 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma by immunohistochemistry. We analyzed associations between the level of podoplanin expression and various clinicopathologic parameters, including response to radiochemotherapy, clinical and histological N-status. Furthermore we evaluated the effects of these parameters on overall survival and on locoregional control in univariate and multivariate analysis. The χ(2)-test revealed that high expression of podoplanin in pretreatment biopsy material was associated with non-regression of the tumor (p=0.013) and poor overall survival (p<0.001). Five-year survival rates of 92.9% for patients with weak expression and 15.0% for high expression were revealed. Podoplanin expression was also significantly associated with ypN status (p=0.004) and ypUICC status (p<0.001). We concluded that podoplanin might serve as a factor to predict treatment response in oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant platin-based radiochemotherapy as well as a prognostic factor for overall survival and locoregional control.

Surgical treatment is recommended for advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Oral squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most frequent types of head and neck cancers in Japan. Although recent reports have shown positive results of non-surgical treatment for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, including tongue cancer, no clear treatment strategies have been established for oral cancers, except for tongue cancer. To assess appropriate therapies, we conducted a retrospective chart review of 114 Japanese patients with oral cancers that were pathologically diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma, excluding tongue cancers. The overall and the disease specific 5-year survival rates were 53% and 61%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed a lower stage (I, II, or III) and non-surgical treatment as good and poor prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma, respectively, based on their hazard ratios of 0.17 (95% CI 0.045-0.60, p = 0.0061) and 5.3 (95% CI 2.7-11, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, impact of surgery was well documented in the operable stage IVa cancers (p = 0.00015). The surgical treatment consisted of the wide resection of the primary tumor and the neck dissection for stage III or IV tumors. The present data also suggest that adjunctive therapy, such as post-operative radiation therapy or post-operative chemo-radiation therapy, shows no survival benefit compared to the surgery alone. We therefore recommend the surgical treatment for advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese patients. These results would be helpful in future clinical trials, especially in non-surgical treatment studies of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Japan.

Induction chemotherapy response and recurrence rates in correlation with N0 or N+ stage in oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC)

The authors compared N0 with N+ cases in neoadjuvant chemotherapy regression and recurrence. During a 12-year period, 180 consecutive oral squamous cell cancer patients were observed. Of these patients, 78 were N0 and 102 N+ stages. The drugs used were as follows: bleomycin, vincristine, methotrexate, and mitolactol. After three courses of chemotherapy, the regression (complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR)) and side effect rate were determined. All patients were operated on and observed for the number and localization of recurrences during 3 year follow-up time. The N0 cases came from T2-3, while N+ was from T2-4a (AJCC 2002). The regression in the N0 group was CR 46%, PR 53%, and NR 1%; but in the N+ group, it was CR 12%, PR 72%, and NR 16%. The regression rate was significantly higher (p = 0.00025) for N0 group than N+ group. The regression rate for T3 N0 was significantly higher (p = 0.055) than for T3 N+ cases. In the N0 stage, the regression rate was significantly higher (p = 0.0174) for T2 than T3. In N+ stage, there was no significant difference (p = 0.183) for T2-4a. The side effects were slight. The recurrence rate for the N0 group was significantly lower (15%, p = 0.000069), while for N+ group, it was 59%. The dependence in the T3 cases was also significant (p = 0.009) in the 3-year tumor-free survival. The N stage seems a more important prognostic factor for chemotherapy response and recurrence rate than the T stage. Stage III can be divided into subgroups without metastasis (III.a) and with metastasis (III.b.), based on significant difference in regression and recurrence rate.

Preoperative concurrent chemotherapy with S-1 and radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: phase I trial

Background

This study was conducted to identify a recommended dose for S-1, used in combination with 40-Gy radiation.

Methods

Thirty patients, 15 each with stage III and IVA oral carcinoma, were enrolled. All patients received a total dose of 40-Gy. For the S-1 treatment, patients were given either the standard Japanese dose, calculated according to body surface area, or a reduced dose. Groups consisting of at least three patients were given S-1 according to one of 8 regimens.

Results

Hematologic toxicity was mild and reversible. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was mucositis. At level 8 that was the standard S-1 dose for 5 days per week for 4 weeks, dose-limiting toxicity was observed when 2 patients had grade 4 mucositis. This level was thus deemed the maximum tolerated dose for the regimen.

Conclusions

The recommended dose of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy was the reduced dose of S-1 given for 5 days per week, for 4 consecutive weeks. Preoperative S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy was well tolerate and feasible and warrants a phase II study.

Chemoradiation for patients with advanced oral cavity cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Patients with advanced oral cavity cancer (OCC) typically have not been enrolled in clinical trials utilizing contemporary multimodality strategies. There exist dogmatic expectations of inferior outcome in OCC patients secondary to ineffectiveness of treatment and unacceptable toxicity. The purpose of this study was to analyze survival, swallowing function, and incidence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of patients with stage III/IV OCC who have undergone primary concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

All advanced OCC patients who were enrolled in University of Chicago concomitant CRT protocols from 1994 to 2008 were reviewed. One hundred eleven newly diagnosed advanced OCC patients were evaluated. We performed a subset analysis of 27 additional advanced OCC patients who underwent surgery followed by postoperative CRT. Swallowing function was assessed via oropharyngeal motility study, and a Swallowing Performance Status Scale score was assigned. Presence of clinically significant ORN was documented.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 3.25 years. Five-year overall and progression-free survival was 66.9% and 65.9%, respectively. There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival when the surgery-first group was compared with the primary CRT group (P = .88 and P = .86 respectively). Function, without gastric tube requirement, was excellent, with 92.2% of patients able to maintain weight via oral route. Incidence of ORN was 18.4%, occurring in nine of 49 patients evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the use of primary CRT as a viable treatment option for patients with advanced OCC. Survival is high, and overall function for the majority of patients is satisfactory. Patients with T4 oral tongue cancer may be spared total glossectomy. The incidence of ORN may be considered acceptable, in light of the benefits of enduring life and function.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the management of oral cancer: a review

INTRODUCTION

Multi-modality treatment concepts involving preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and subsequent radical resection are used much less frequently than postoperative treatment for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. In some centres, however, the preoperative approach has been established for several years.

MATERIAL

The present review is a compilation of the existing evidence on this subject.

METHODS

In a literature-based meta-analysis, the survival data of 1927 patients from 32 eligible publications were analysed.

RESULTS

The calculated survival rates of documented patients show remarkably good results with preoperative CRT and radical surgery. However, the findings of this analysis are based on data with a large proportion of studies using consecutive patient series.

CONCLUSION

Hard evidence providing sufficient data from prospective randomised studies is as yet missing for preoperative CRT. Prospective randomised studies are mandatory in this area.

Identification of angiogenesis/metastases genes predicting chemoradiotherapy response in patients with laryngopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify genes related to angiogenesis/metastasis that predict locoregional failure in patients with laryngopharyngeal cancer (LPC) undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) treatment.

METHODS

Tumor tissue was collected and snap-frozen from 35 sequential patients with histologically confirmed LPC being treated with CRT. Gene expression analysis was performed using a novel cDNA array consisting of 277 genes functionally associated with angiogenesis (n = 152) and/or metastasis (n = 125). Locoregional response was correlated to the gene expression profiles to identify genes associated with outcome. These genes were internally validated by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and validated externally by immunohistochemistry analysis on an independent set of patients.

RESULTS

Locoregional failure occurred in nine of 35 patients. Seventeen genes from the cDNA microarray correlated with locoregional failure (two-sample t test, P < .05). Seven genes were chosen for additional analysis based on the availability of antibodies for immunohistochemistry. Of these seven genes, real-time RT-PCR validated four genes: MDM2, VCAM-1, erbB2, and H-ras (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P = .008, .02, .04, and .04, respectively). External validation by immunohistochemistry confirmed MDM2 and erbB2 as being predictive of locoregional response. Controlling for stage of disease, positivity for MDM2 or erbB2 was an independent negative predictor of locoregional disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Genomic screening by cDNA microarray and validation internally by real-time RT-PCR and externally by immunohistochemistry have identified two genes (MDM2 and erbB2) as predictors of locoregional failure in LPC patients treated with CRT. The role of these genes in treatment selection and the functional basis for their activity in CRT response merit additional consideration.

Overall Survival of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated With Different Treatment Modalities

Therapeutic modalities of use in tumor therapy can be applied in various combinations to treat malignant lesions of the mesopharynx. A study was made of the overall survival of patients with mesopharyngeal carcinoma treated with different modalities in our institution in the period 1995-2000. In this retrospective study, a total of 66 patients were divided into 4 groups: Patients who took part in 1) intra-arterial chemotherapy and subsequent irradiation; 2) intra-arterial chemotherapy and surgical care; 3) only surgical care; or 4) only irradiation or palliative treatment. In each group, the five-year survival rate was examined, as a function of the age of the patient, the initial tumor size, the lymph node status and the clinical stage. The five-year overall survival rate in group 1 was 28.57%, in both group 2 and group 3 was 66.66%, and in group 4 was 20%. For all of the 66 patients, it was 43.93%. For groups 2 and 3, the Kendall rank correction test did not reveal a significant effect of the lymph node state or the clinical stage on the survival, whereas the effects of the age and the initial tumor size did prove to be significant. The Cox regression test showed the latter of these two effects to be the stronger. As 64 of the 66 patients examined were treated for tumors in clinical stages III or IV, the five-year survival rate of 43.93% may be said to be good. The comparison of groups 2 and 3 revealed that (in spite of the poorer initial prognosis in group 2) the survival rates were the same, i.e. the neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy improved the prognosis.

Treatment results and prognostic factors in oral tongue cancer: analysis of 80 patients

Treatment results and prognostic factors for 80 patients with oral tongue cancer admitted to Istanbul University Oncology Institute between 1987 and 2000 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were treated by surgery and postoperative or curative radiotherapy. Median age was 55 (22-93) out of which 41 patients (51%) were male and 39 (49%) were female. One patient (1%) had stage I disease, 28 patients (36%) stage II, 18 patients (23%) stage III and 32 patients (40%) stage IVA disease. Nineteen patients (24%) were medically inoperable or refused surgical treatment, so were treated with curative radiotherapy to a total dose of 70Gy (group A). The remaining 61 patients (76%) were treated with surgery and postoperative external beam radiotherapy (group B). The median follow-up time was 44 months. The 5-year overall and loco-regional disease-free survival rates were 42% and 46%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 16% in group A and 49% in group B (P=0.0002). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 23% in group A while in group B it was 49%; the difference was statistically significant (P=0.02). Combined treatment improves overall and disease-free survival in patients with stage II, III and IVA oral tongue cancer. In patients who are not candidates for surgery, the effect of radiotherapy may be increased with the use of brachytherapy.

Predictive factors for the histologic response to preoperative radiotherapy in advanced oral cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy are important in treating advanced oral cancer. We attempted to elucidate predictive factors for the histologic response to preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with locally advanced cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx were treated preoperatively with radiotherapy (50 Gy); surgery included modification of the resected area to preserve organ function.

RESULTS

Hemoglobin level and histologic differentiation were independent factors significantly associated with the histologic response by multivariate analysis. Locoregional failure occurred only in patients with poor histologic response, and there was a significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between patients with good and poor responses (84% vs 32%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the histologic response at the primary site and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

We identified predictive factors for a good response to preoperative therapy and found a high survival rate in patients with a good response.

The role of chemotherapy for advanced oro and hypopharyngeal cancer

Although important progress continuous to be made in the treatment of oro and hypopharyngeal cancer, the 5-year survival rate for all this disease has remained at less than 30% for the past 30 years. In the early 1980s, chemotherapy was introduced with high expectation of reducing in the incidence of distant metastases and increasing the possibility of local control. This article explores the use of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pharyngeal cancer. Thus, the efficacy of chemotherapy are reviewed and treatment options for advanced pharyngeal cancer are made. When advanced carcinoma is still localized, function-preserving surgery is performed. In these cases, the possibility of instituting adjuvant chemotherapy with an active treatment regimen may be taken into account depending on the condition of the patient and the tumor. Patients with surgically resectable tumors are given 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapy. Cases who respond to the induction chemotherapy are subsequently given concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Residual lymph nodes in the neck are removed surgically. The cases who do not respond to the induction chemotherapy are treated with radical surgery. Patients with unresectable carcinoma are given concurrent chemoradiotherapy because local treatment should be performed in such patients as early as possible. In principle, concurrent regimens should be supplemented with adjuvant chemotherapy in all cases. This is particularly required for those with advanced N-stage patients.

Combined modality treatment with full-dose chemotherapy and concomitant boost radiotherapy for advanced head and neck carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a treatment concept combining three cycles of full-dose chemotherapy (CT) with concomitant accelerated uninterrupted radiotherapy (RT). Twenty-three patients (median age: 54 years, range: 35-70) with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were included. The primary tumor involved the hypopharynx (n=7), base of the tongue (n=10), nasopharynx (n=2) or upper esophagus (n=1) or its location was unknown (n=3). Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1; 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for 5 days as a continuous infusion, preceded by amifostine 910 mg/m2), repeated every 3 weeks. Uninterrupted concomitant boost-accelerated RT (total dose of 70 Gy in 6 weeks) started together on day 1 of the second cycle. All but two patients received the full course of RT. Eighteen patients achieved complete remission (78%). At a median follow-up of 45 months the overall survival was 56% (95% c.i. 32-79%) and the loco-regional control 71% (95% c.i. 52-91%). Toxicity involved reversible renal insufficiency of > or = grade II in 9 patients (39%) and neutropenic fever in 9 patients (39%). All patients suffered from moderate to severe mucositis (grade II/III), and 19 patients presented cutaneous toxicity grade III. Concomitant boost-accelerated RT combined with concurrent full-dose cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy and amifostine is feasible with manageable, although substantial, toxicity. The overall survival of 4 years is promising. Newer regimens causing less acute mucosal and skin toxicity are needed.

Organ preservation therapy using induction plus concurrent chemoradiation for advanced resectable oropharyngeal carcinoma: a University of Pennsylvania Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy, feasibility, and toxicity of a new regimen for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had technically resectable stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, exclusive of T1-2N1. Induction chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin (area under the curve formula equal to 6) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) for two cycles, followed by re-evaluation. Patients with major response continued to definitive radiotherapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) plus concurrent once-weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m(2)/wk). Patients with advanced neck disease also underwent post-radiation therapy neck dissection and two more chemotherapy cycles.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 31 months (minimum follow-up for survivors was 18 months). The major response rate to induction chemotherapy was 89%; 90% of patients had a complete response after concurrent chemoradiation. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 70%, and 3-year event-free survival was 59%. The 3-year actuarial locoregional control was 82% and the 3-year actuarial rate of distant metastases was 19%. Organ preservation was achieved in 77% of all patients. One patient (2%) died during therapy. Late grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients, consisting mainly of chronic dysphagia/aspiration and/or radiation soft tissue ulceration. The treatment-related mortality rate was 4% (two patients died from respiratory failure).

CONCLUSION

Response to induction chemotherapy as studied in this trial was not useful as a predictive marker for ultimate outcome or organ conservation. Overall, however, this regimen offers good disease control and survival for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma, comparable with other concurrent chemoradiation programs. Further study of similar protocols is indicated.

Prognostic evaluation of preoperative thermochemoradiotherapy for N(3) cervical lymph node metastases of oral cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, histopathological efficacy, and response to preoperative thermochemoradiotherapy for N(3) cervical lymph node metastases of oral cancer.

METHODS

Preoperative thermochemoradiotherapy was performed in 8 patients with oral cancer and N(3) cervical lymph node metastasis. These patients underwent four-weekly sessions of hyperthermia, combined with radiotherapy (40 Gy) as well as chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP; 100 mg/m2), all prior to surgery. Radical neck dissection was performed 4 weeks after completion of preoperative thermochemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

The preoperative treatment of cervical lymph node metastases yielded a partial response in 6 patients, while 2 patients demonstrated no change. Histopathologically, grade III was detected in 1, grade IIb in 4 and grade IIa in 3 patients after surgery, according to the criteria of Shimosato. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 64 months (mean 34). Of the 8 patients, 2 died (1 of lymph node metastasis and 1 had metastasis to a distant site), and 6 patients were alive at the last follow-up, with the longest postoperative disease-free survival being 63 months. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 70.0%.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that preoperative thermochemoradiotherapy is a promising modality for patients with N(3) cervical lymph node metastasis of oral cancer.

[Factors affecting local and regional control and survival of carcinomas of the tongue and floor of mouth]

A retrospective study of 142 patients that had previous surgery for carcinoma of the tongue or floor of mouth looking into the factors that affect significantly the evolution of our patients and in which circumstances we could benefit from new therapeutic techniques. Cause specific survival at 3 and 5 years was 63.4% and 56.9% respectively. Recurrences were found locally in 32 patients (22.5%), regional in 32 (22.5%) and metastasis in 11 (7.4%). T staging had no did impact on local recurrence, but the presence of positive margins (p = 0.0323). Regional control for N0/N1 was 85% (90/106) versus 55.5% (20/36) for N2/N3 (p = 0.001). Regional control by N staging was 84.5% (73/86) for N0, 85% (17/20) for N1, 57% (30/35) for N2 and 0% for N3 (0/1). Both, N staging and number of positive nodes had a significant impact in specific survival. Positive margins and the presence of positive nodes have the greatest impact on survival and regional control. Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy did not increase survival, but not prospective random selection was performed. To evaluate this.