Increase of chemotherapy use in older women with breast carcinoma from 1991 to 1996

Intensity of End-of-Life Care in a Cohort of Commercially Insured Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

There is limited evidence on the intensity of end-of-life (EOL) care for women < 65 years old, who account for about 40% of breast cancer deaths in the United States. Using established indicators, we estimated the intensity of EOL care among these women.

METHODS

We used 2000-2014 claims data from a large US insurer to identify women with metastatic breast cancer who, in the last month of their lives, had more than one hospital admission, emergency department visit, or an intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or used antineoplastic therapy in the last 14 days of life. Using multivariate logistic regression, we assessed whether intensity of EOL care differed by demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, or regions.

RESULTS

Adjusted estimates show an increase in EOL ICU admissions between 2000-2003 and 2010-2014 from 14% (95% CI, 10% to 17%) to 23% (95% CI, 20% to 26%) and a small increase in emergency department visits from 10% (95% CI, 7% to 13%) to 12% (95% CI, 9% to 15%), both statistically significant. There was no statistically significant change in the proportions of women experiencing more than one EOL hospitalization (14% in 2010-2014; 95% CI, 11% to 17%) and of those receiving EOL antineoplastic treatment (24% in 2010-2014; 95% CI, 21% to 27%). Living in predominantly mixed, Hispanic, Black, or Asian neighborhoods correlated with more intense care (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.77 for ICU).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with findings in the Medicare population, our results suggest an overall increase in the number of ICU admissions at the EOL over time. They also suggest that patients from non-White neighborhoods receive more intense acute care.

Landmark trials in the medical oncology management of early stage breast cancer

With the advent of breast cancer screening programs, the majorities of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer are diagnosed with early stage disease and are likely to experience cure with proper treatment. Significant advances have been made in the management of early-stage breast cancer to personalize treatment according to disease biology. This progress has led to improvement in survival outcomes and quality of life for our patients. In this review, we discuss landmark clinical trials in medical oncology that have shaped the current standard of care for early stage ER-positive, HER2-positive, and triple negative breast cancer.

Urinary concentrations of environmental phenols and their associations with breast cancer incidence and mortality following breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Environmental phenols, compounds used widely in personal care and consumer products, are known endocrine disruptors. Few epidemiologic studies have examined the association of phenol biomarkers with breast cancer incidence and, to our knowledge, none have considered associations with mortality following breast cancer. We examined seven urinary phenol biomarkers in association with breast cancer incidence and subsequent mortality, and examined effect measure modification by body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Participants included 711 women with breast cancer and 598 women without breast cancer who were interviewed for the population-based Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. Among women with breast cancer, phenol biomarkers were quantified in spot urine samples collected on average within three months of a first diagnosis of primary in situ or invasive breast cancer in 1996-1997. Women with breast cancer were monitored for vital status using the National Death Index. After a median follow-up of 17.6 years, we identified 271 deaths, including 98 deaths from breast cancer. We examined creatinine-corrected phenol concentrations and the sum of parabens (Σparabens) in association with breast cancer incidence using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and with mortality using Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. We evaluated multiplicative effect measure modification using cross-product terms in nested models.

RESULTS

The highest (vs lowest) quintiles of urinary methylparaben, propylparaben, and Σparabens were associated with risk of breast cancer with ORs ranging from 1.31 to 1.50. Methylparaben, propylparaben, and Σparabens were also associated with all-cause mortality HRs ranging from 0.68 to 0.77. Associations for breast cancer incidence were more pronounced among women with BMI < 25.0 kg/m2 than among women with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2; however, associations for mortality were more pronounced among women with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 than among women with BMI < 25 kg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Select parabens may have differential associations with risk of developing breast cancer and mortality following breast cancer.

Age-related Differences in Patients Admitted to a Palliative Home Care Service

Aims

The aim of the study was to investigate possible differences in access to the service, symptomatology and therapy in relation to age among terminal cancer patients admitted to a home care program. We examined prospectively all 116 terminal cancer patients enrolled in a home care program in 1998, comparing those up to 70 years of age (48 patients) with those above 70 (68 patients). We also compared the age-related characteristics of this population with those of all 348 patients enrolled in the program in 1989-1991. There were no significant differences between the two age groups of the 1998 population in terms of symptoms, tumor site or medication, although NSAID use tended to be greater in older patients, and opioid and anti-emetic use greater in younger patients. Patients up to 70 years of age had significantly shorter survival from admission to home care than those over 70, and a greater proportion had metastases. There were no such significant age-related differences as regards survival and the presence of metastases in patients enrolled 10 years before. In conclusion, among terminally ill cancer patients referred to a palliative home care service in Milan, mostly treated at the National Cancer Institute, the 10-year admission trend showed that palliative care is made available increasingly later, particularly to those up to 70 years of age, in contrast to current recommendations.

Development of a Risk Prediction Model to Individualize Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Little data are available regarding individual patients' risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. Our objective was to develop a risk prediction model for mastectomy-related SSI.

METHODS

Using commercial claims data, we established a cohort of women <65 years of age who underwent a mastectomy from 1 January 2004-31 December 2011. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were used to identify SSI within 180 days after surgery. SSI risk factors were determined with multivariable logistic regression using derivation data from 2004-2008 and validated with 2009-2011 data using discrimination and calibration measures.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, 595 SSIs were identified in 7607 (7.8 %) women, and 396 SSIs were coded in 4366 (9.1 %) women in the validation cohort. Independent risk factors for SSIs included rural residence, rheumatologic disease, depression, diabetes, hypertension, liver disease, obesity, pre-existing pneumonia or urinary tract infection, tobacco use disorder, smoking-related diseases, bilateral mastectomy, and immediate reconstruction. Receipt of home healthcare was associated with lower risk. The model performed equally in the validation cohort per discrimination (C-statistics 0.657 and 0.649) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.091 and 0.462 for derivation and validation, respectively). Three risk strata were created based on predicted SSI risk, which demonstrated good correlation with the proportion of observed infections in the strata.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and internally validated an SSI risk prediction model that can be used to counsel women with regard to their individual risk of SSI post-mastectomy. Immediate reconstruction, diabetes, and smoking-related diseases were important risk factors for SSI in this non-elderly population of women undergoing mastectomy.

CMF-regimen preferred as first-course chemotherapy for older and sicker women with breast cancer: Findings from a SEER-Medicare-based population study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-Fluorouracil (CMF) utilization as a first-course chemotherapy regimen among female Medicare patients with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

A longitudinal study was conducted with women 66 years and older, diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer from 1993 to 2004, and receiving chemotherapy using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result-Medicare data. First-course CMF chemotherapy was defined as chemotherapy initiation within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis, with at least 1 claim of CMF each within 1 year of diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

Older and sicker women, living in census tracts with lower average education, and diagnosed with advanced stage, hormone receptor-negative tumors have a higher probability of CMF administration. Receipt of lymph node dissection and nonreceipt of radiation therapy were also associated with CMF administration. CMF administration has declined over the years and has significant regional variation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in CMF use overtime indicates the increased use of newer and more effective systemic therapies among breast cancer patients. In spite of the reduction in CMF use over time, CMF is more frequently administered to older and sicker women, possibly because of higher risk of anthracycline-induced toxicities in these patients. Clinical guidelines have no recommendations for CMF administration in breast cancer patients with certain clinical characteristics. Hence, it is important to understand if the associations observed in this study can be clinically justified in order to reduce unjustified use of less-effective regimens.

Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of hospitalization between patients with early-stage breast cancer who received different chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We identified 3,567 patients older than age 65 years from the SEER/Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare database and 9,327 patients younger than age 65 years from the MarketScan database who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 2003 and 2007. The selection was nonrandomized and nonprospectively collected. We categorized patients according to the regimens they received: docetaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (A) and C, TAC, AC + T, dose-dense AC + paclitaxel (P) or AC + weekly P. We compared the rates of chemotherapy-related hospitalizations that occurred within 6 months of chemotherapy initiation and used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the factors associated with these hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Among patients younger than age 65 years, the hospitalization rates ranged from 6.2% (dose-dense AC + P) to 10.0% (TAC), and those who received TAC and AC + T had significantly higher rates of hospitalization than did patients who received TC. Among patients older than age 65 years, these rates ranged from 12.7% (TC) to 24.2% (TAC) and the rates of hospitalization of patients who received TAC, AC + T, AC, or AC + weekly P were higher than those of patients who received TC.

CONCLUSION

TAC and AC + T were associated with the highest risk of hospitalization in patients younger than age 65 years. Among patients older than age 65 years, all regimens (aside from dose-dense AC + P) were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization than TC. Results may be affected by selection biases where less aggressive regimens are offered to frailer patients.

Fall-related injuries in elderly cancer patients treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fall-related injuries are a well-described cause of morbidity and mortality in the community-dwelling elderly population, but have not been well described in patients with cancer. Cancer treatment with chemotherapy can result in many unwanted side effects, including peripheral neuropathy if the drugs are potentially neurotoxic. Peripheral neuropathy and other side effects of chemotherapy may lead to an increased risk of fall-related injuries.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the records of 65,311 patients with breast, colon, lung, or prostate cancer treated with chemotherapy in the SEER-Medicare database from 1994 to 2007. The primary outcome was any fall-related injury defined as a traumatic fracture, dislocation, or head injury within 12 months of the first dose of chemotherapy. The sample population was divided into 3 cohorts based on whether they most frequently received a neurotoxic doublet, single agent, or a non-neurotoxic chemotherapy. Cox proportional-hazards analyses were adjusted for baseline characteristics to determine the risk of fall-related injuries among the 3 cohorts.

RESULTS

The rate of fall-related injuries for patients receiving a doublet of neurotoxic chemotherapy (9.15 per 1000 person-months) was significantly higher than for those receiving a single neurotoxic agent (7.76 per 1000 person-months) or a non-neurotoxic agent (5.19 per 1000 person-months). Based on the Cox proportional-hazards model risk of fall-related injuries was highest for the cohort receiving a neurotoxic doublet after the model was adjusted for baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Among elderly patients with cancer, use of neurotoxic chemotherapy is associated with an increased risk of fall-related injuries.

Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival of elderly korean patients with breast carcinoma

Purpose

The available research work on types of treatment and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in older Korean patients is insufficient. Henceforth, this report assessed treatment patterns and the relationship between chemotherapy and survival in elderly Korean breast cancer patients.

Methods

We identified women over 55 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer from the period 1995 to 2006. Clinicopathologic features and treatment methods were compared for three groups divided on the basis of age: 55 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and over 70 years old. The effects of chemotherapy on survival were compared overall and individually for each group.

Results

A total of 832 patients over 55 years of age were included in the present investigation. No statistical differences were observed between the three age groups in clinicopathologic features including tumor size, grade, and stage. However, patients in the elderly group received mastectomy more often when compared to the younger groups (p<0.001). In contrast, there was a decline in radiation treatment and chemotherapy with older age (p<0.001). Overall, patients who received chemotherapy had a significantly increased breast cancer specific survival and overall survival rate when compared to the non-chemotherapy groups (p=0.022). Among the estrogen receptor positive group, no statistical significance was achieved in the survival benefit of chemotherapy. However, in estrogen receptor-negative patients, overall, the chemotherapy groups showed a better survival rate than the non-chemotherapy patients and a similar trend was observed in each age group except in the group comprising of 70 years old patients.

Conclusion

This study describes the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in Korean patients over 55 years of age, especially in hormone receptor-negative patients. Hence, based on the results of the present report and considering the similarity of clinicopathologic features between age groups, it is proposed that age alone should not be a determinant factor of treatment methods.

A literature review to investigate the link between psychosocial characteristics and treatment adherence in cancer patients

Adherence to medication has been recognized as a key issue in health outcomes and efforts to improve patients' adherence are being made by the pharmaceutical industry, experts, and government bodies alike. This paper presents a review of these issues according to previous descriptive findings. Relevant studies written in English, published in 1976 or later, were identified through Medline, Embase and PsycInfo databases and reviewed. Review articles and clinical trials were excluded; all observational studies and surveys were considered. Articles were reviewed for any discussion of patients' characteristics and psychosocial characteristics affecting adherence to cancer treatment. The search strategy included a combination of key words adherence and cancer in titles. The major findings are summarized and presented under two main headings: i) patients' characteristics; and ii) psychosocial characteristics. In general, factors associated with increased likelihood of adherence to cancer treatment included younger age, higher education, higher income and Caucasian ethnicity. With regards to the psychosocial factors, lower levels of depression and anxiety, optimism as well as social support seemed to have a positive effect on treatment adherence. Studies of patterns of care in cancer treatment can help identify challenges in health care provided to particular subgroups of cancer patients and can aid researchers in designing studies that account for such factors in clinical and outcomes' research.

Socioeconomic status and chemotherapy use for melanoma in older people

The study objective was to examine the association, among older persons with cutaneous melanoma, between areal socioeconomic status (SES) and receiving chemotherapy. SEER-Medicare-linked database (1,239 white men and women aged ≥ 66, with invasive melanoma [regional and distant stages]; 1991-1999) was used. SES was measured by census tract poverty level (average of 1990 and 2000 Census data). Covariates were sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, and comorbidity index. Residing in poorer SES areas was associated with a lower likelihood for receiving chemotherapy among patients in the overall sample (adjusted odds ratios = OR 0.97, 95% confidence interval = CI 0.95-0.99), and those with regional stage at diagnosis (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.98). These findings reflect socioeconomic disparities in chemotherapy use for melanoma among older white patients in the United States.

Factors affecting receipt of chemotherapy in women with breast cancer

AIMS

To review literature describing factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy for breast cancer, to better understand what factors are most relevant to women's health and whether health disparities are apparent, and to assess how these factors might affect observational studies and outcomes research. Patterns of care for metastatic breast cancer, for which no standard-of-care exists, were of particular interest.

METHODS

Relevant studies written in English, Italian, French, or Spanish, published in 2000 or later, were identified through MEDLINE and reviewed. Review articles and clinical trials were excluded; all observational studies and surveys were considered. Articles were reviewed for any discussion of patient characteristics, hospital/physician/insurance characteristics, psychosocial characteristics, and clinical characteristics affecting receipt of chemotherapy by breast cancer patients.

RESULTS

In general, factors associated with increased likelihood of receiving chemotherapy included younger age, being Caucasian, having good general health and few co-morbidities, having more severe clinical disease, having responded well to previous treatment, and having breast cancer that is estrogen- or progesterone-receptor-negative. Many of the clinical factors found to increase the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy were consistent with current oncology guidelines. Of the relevant 19 studies identified, only six (32%) reported data specific to metastatic cancer; most studies aggregated women with stage I-IV for purposes of analysis.

CONCLUSION

Studies of patterns of care in breast cancer treatment can help identify challenges in health care provided to particular subgroups of women and can aid researchers in designing studies that account for such factors in clinical and outcomes research. Although scarce, studies evaluating only women with metastatic breast cancer indicate that factors affecting decisions related to receipt of chemotherapy are similar across stage for this disease.

Breast cancer among the oldest old: tumor characteristics, treatment choices, and survival

PURPOSE Few data are available on breast cancer characteristics, treatment, and survival for women age 80 years or older. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data set from 1992 to 2003 to examine tumor characteristics, treatments (mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery [BCS] with radiation therapy or alone, or no surgery), and outcomes of women age 80 years or older (80 to 84, 85 to 89, > or = 90 years) with stage I/II breast cancer compared with younger women (age 67 to 79 years). We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine the impact of age on breast cancer-related and other causes of death. Analyses were performed within stage, adjusted for tumor and sociodemographic characteristics, treatments received, and comorbidities. Results In total, 49,616 women age 67 years or older with stage I/II disease were included. Tumor characteristics (grade, hormone receptivity) were similar across age groups. Treatment with BCS alone increased with age, especially after age 80. The risk of dying from breast cancer increased with age, significantly after age 80. For stage I disease, the adjusted hazard ratio of dying from breast cancer for women age > or = 90 years compared with women age 67 to 69 years was 2.6 (range, 2.0 to 3.4). Types of treatments received were significantly associated with age and comorbidity, with age as the stronger predictor (26% of women age > or = 80 years without comorbidity received BCS alone or no surgery compared with 6% of women age 67 to 79 years). CONCLUSION Women age > or = 80 years have breast cancer characteristics similar to those of younger women yet receive less aggressive treatment and experience higher mortality from early-stage breast cancer. Future studies should focus on identifying tumor and patient characteristics to help target treatments to the oldest women most likely to benefit.

Development and validation of a prediction model for the risk of developing febrile neutropenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy among elderly patients with breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancer

Purpose

Current guidelines recommend prophylactic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) when febrile neutropenia (FN) risk is greater than 20%. Advanced age is a risk factor for FN; however, little is known about the impact of other factors on the incidence of FN in an older population.

Patients and methods

We analyzed SEER-Medicare data (1994–2005) to develop and validate a prediction model for hospitalization with fever, infection, or neutropenia occurring after chemotherapy initiation for patients with breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer.

Results

In multivariate analysis (N = 58,053) independent predictors of FN included advanced stage at diagnosis [stage 2 (OR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09–1.53), stage 3 (1.38; 95% CI: 1.19–1.60), and stage 4 (1.57; 95% CI: 1.35–1.83)], number of associated comorbid conditions [one condition (1.13; 95% CI: 1.02–1.28), two conditions (1.39; 95% CI: 1.22–1.57), and three or more conditions (1.81; 95% CI: 1.61–2.04)], receipt of myelosuppressive chemotherapy (1.11; 95% CI: 0.94–1.32), and receipt of chemotherapy within 1 month of diagnosis [1 to 3 months (0.70; 95% CI: 0.62–0.80) and greater than 3 months (0.63; 95% CI: 0.55–0.73)].

Conclusion

We created a prediction model for febrile neutropenia with first cycle of chemotherapy in a large population of elderly patients with common malignancies.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in adjuvant chemotherapy for older women with lymph node-positive, operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Consistent with findings from clinical trials, a recent population-based study indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive, operable breast cancer is effective at improving survival in older women, specifically those ages 65 years to 69 years; however, to the authors' knowledge, no conclusion has been reached about the relative benefit of chemotherapy for women aged > or =70 years, probably because of small number of patients. However, little is known about racial and socioeconomic disparities in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer among older women.

METHODS

This study included 14,177 white women and 1277 black women aged > or =65 years who were diagnosed with operable breast cancer (stage II-IIIA) and positive lymph nodes between 1991 and 2002. These women were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare-linked database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratios of receiving chemotherapy among black women compared with white women, and the causal step approach was used to test whether census tract-level poverty mediated racial disparities.

RESULTS

Interaction terms analyses indicated that regressions should be stratified by age group. In the group ages 65 years to 69 years, the adjusted odds ratio of receiving chemotherapy were lower for black women than for white women (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.97). Poverty mediated the association between chemotherapy and race in this age group. No racial or socioeconomic disparities were observed among women aged > or =70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documented racial disparities in adjuvant chemotherapy that were mediated by poverty in women ages 65 years to 69 years, an age group for which there is clear evidence for the efficacy of chemotherapy, but no disparities were observed among women aged > or =70 years. The authors concluded that it is important to work toward reducing treatment disparities among older women.

Predictors of toxicity and toxicity profile of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients

Women older than 70 years have been underrepresented in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy trials due to concerns about toxicity, safety and tolerance of chemotherapy. The aim of our study was to assess the tolerance of chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer and determine patterns of toxicity including the impact of age, chemotherapy regimen, functional status and comorbid conditions on this toxicity. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of early stage (stages 1 and 2) breast cancer patients older than 70 years from 1998 to 2004. A total of 62 patients, with mean age of 74.3 years, were identified. Chemotherapy was completed in 89% patients. Overall 79% completed chemotherapy without any significant side-effects, dose reductions, or breaks during chemotherapy. Using logistic regression model increasing age was not associated with early termination of chemotherapy (p = 0.19, OR: 0.868, 95% CI: 0.7-1.076). However, increasing age, lower functional status, and higher comorbidity index scores were associated with reduction in dose and breaks in chemotherapy. None of the patients who received pegfilgrastim prophylactically developed high-grade neutropenia. Our study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy is safe in elderly patients. Older patients with good functional status and low comorbidity index scores tolerate chemotherapy as well as the younger patients. Prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim may reduce occurrence of severe neutropenia and related toxicity such as febrile neutropenia in the elderly patient.

Risk of dementia in older breast cancer survivors: a population-based cohort study of the association with adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether there is an association between delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy to older women with breast cancer and development of dementia over time.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data linked to Medicare claims data.

SETTING

Women residing in geographic areas included in the SEER registry.

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged 66 to 80 diagnosed with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer from 1992 to 1999 were included. It was determined whether patients had undergone chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis.

MEASUREMENTS

Whether women developed dementia over time was determined using diagnostic codes. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on development of dementia was evaluated, adjusting for confounders using a proportional hazards model stratified for age.

RESULTS

Twenty-one thousand three hundred sixty-two women met selection criteria; 2,913 received chemotherapy, and 18,449 did not. Women who received chemotherapy were younger than those who did not (median aged 70 vs 73; P<.001). Median follow-up time was 59 months. After controlling for other factors, it was found that chemotherapy was not associated with a greater risk of development of dementia over time for any age group (hazard ratio for dementia in women receiving chemotherapy: aged 66-70=0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.48-1.45, P=.5; aged 71-75=0.74, 95% CI=0.46-1.18, P=.2; aged 76-80=0.49, 95% CI=0.28-0.88, P=.02).

CONCLUSION

Receipt of chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer was not associated with a greater risk of dementia diagnosis over time; very elderly women who undergo chemotherapy may be at lower baseline risk. The use of a claims-based definition of dementia limited the study.

The role of poverty rate and racial distribution in the geographic clustering of breast cancer survival among older women: a geographic and multilevel analysis

The authors examined disparities in survival among women aged 66 years or older in association with census-tract-level poverty rate, racial distribution, and individual-level factors, including patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related factors, utilization of medical care, and mammography use. They used linked data from the 1992-1999 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programs, 1991-1999 Medicare claims, and the 1990 US Census. A geographic information system and advanced statistics identified areas of increased or reduced breast cancer survival and possible reasons for geographic variation in survival in 2 of the 5 SEER areas studied. In the Detroit, Michigan, area, one geographic cluster of shorter-than-expected breast cancer survival was identified (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60). An additional area where survival was longer than expected approached statistical significance (HR = 0.4; P = 0.056). In the Atlanta, Georgia, area, one cluster of shorter- (HR = 1.81) and one cluster of longer-than-expected (HR = 0.72) breast cancer survival were identified. Stage at diagnosis and census-tract poverty (and patient's race in Atlanta) explained the geographic variation in breast cancer survival. No geographic clusters were identified in the 3 other SEER programs. Interventions to reduce late-stage breast cancer, focusing on areas of high poverty and targeting African Americans, may reduce disparities in breast cancer survival in the Detroit and Atlanta areas.

Racial disparities in the development of breast cancer metastases among older women: a multilevel study

BACKGROUND

Distant metastases are the most common and lethal type of breast cancer relapse. The authors examined whether older African American breast cancer survivors were more likely to develop metastases compared with older white women. They also examined the extent to which 6 pathways explained racial disparities in the development of metastases.

METHODS

The authors used 1992-1999 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data with 1991-1999 Medicare data. They used Medicare's International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify metastases of respiratory and digestive systems, brain, bone, or other unspecified sites. The 6 pathways consisted of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, type of treatment received, access to medical care, surveillance mammography use, and area-level characteristics (poverty rate and percentage African American) and were obtained from the SEER or Medicare data.

RESULTS

Of the 35,937 women, 10.5% developed metastases. In univariate analysis, African American women were 1.61 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-1.83) more likely to develop metastasis than white women. In multivariate analysis, tumor grade, stage at diagnosis, and census-tract percentage African American explained why African American women were more likely to develop metastases than white women (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to reduce late-stage breast cancer among African Americans also may reduce racial disparities in subsequent increased risk of developing metastasis. African Americans diagnosed with high-grade breast cancer could be targeted to reduce their risk of metastasis. Future studies should identify specific reasons why the racial distribution in census tracts was associated with racial disparities in the risk of breast cancer metastases.

Area-level poverty is associated with greater risk of ambulatory-care-sensitive hospitalizations in older breast cancer survivors

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the frequency of ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations (ACSHs) and to compare the risk of ACSH in breast cancer survivors living in high-poverty with that of those in low-poverty areas.

DESIGN

Prospective, multilevel study.

SETTING

National, population-based 1991 to 1999 National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data linked with Medicare claims data throughout the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Breast cancer survivors aged 66 and older.

MEASUREMENTS

ACSH was classified according to diagnosis at hospitalization. The percentage of the population living below the U.S. federal poverty line was calculated at the census-tract level. Potential confounders included demographic characteristics, comorbidity, tumor and treatment factors, and availability of medical care.

RESULTS

Of 47,643 women, 13.3% had at least one ACSH. Women who lived in high-poverty census tracts (>or=30% poverty rate) were 1.5 times (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34-1.72) as likely to have at least one ACSH after diagnosis as women who lived in low-poverty census tracts (<10% poverty rate). After adjusting for most confounders, results remained unchanged. After adjustment for comorbidity, the hazard ratio (HR) was reduced to 1.34 (95% CI=1.18-1.52), but adjusting for all variables did not further reduce the risk of ACSH associated with poverty rate beyond adjustment for comorbidity (HR=1.37, 95% CI=1.19-1.58).

CONCLUSION

Elderly breast cancer survivors who lived in high-poverty census tracts may be at increased risk of reduced posttreatment follow-up care, preventive care, or symptom management as a result of not having adequate, timely, and high-quality ambulatory primary care as suggested by ACSH.

Risk of subsequent dementia diagnoses does not vary by types of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about long-term cognitive side effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We thus examined incidence of dementia diagnoses in older women diagnosed with breast cancer, stratified by types of chemotherapy regimen.

METHODS

We identified patients with incident dementia diagnoses through Medicare claims linked to the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry data. The study population (n = 6,932) consisted of women at least 68 years of age, who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer from 1994 through 2002 in one of the SEER areas and received chemotherapy as part of their cancer treatment. Excluded were women with a diagnosis of dementia within the 3 years prior to their cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our sample comprised mostly white women. The mean age was 74. Fifty-seven percent were estrogen receptor positive. Over 70% had no comorbidity. The use of taxol and anthracycline-based treatments increased from mid-1990s to early 2000. Increasing age at cancer diagnosis, Black ethnicity, living in a census tract with lower level of education, and increasing number of comorbidities were associated with new claims of dementia diagnoses after chemotherapy. There was no significant association between types of chemotherapy agents and risk of subsequent dementia diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

No association was found between types of adjuvant chemotherapy agents for breast cancer and risk of new dementia diagnoses. Our findings suggest that concerns about post-chemotherapy dementia should not be a major factor in determining type of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen to prescribe for older women with breast cancer.

Limits of observational data in determining outcomes from cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Observational data are used increasingly to assess the effectiveness of therapies. However, selection biases are likely to have an impact on results and threaten the validity of these studies.

METHODS

The primary objective of the current study was to explore the effect of selection biases in observational studies of treatment effectiveness in cancer care. Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. The following groups of patients were included: 5245 men treated with and without androgen deprivation for locally advanced prostate cancer, 43,847 men with active treatment versus observation for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, and 4860 patients with lymph node-positive colon cancer who were treated with and without fluorouracil chemotherapy. Patients were compared by therapy for the outcomes of cancer-specific mortality, other-cause mortality, and overall mortality.

RESULTS

In all comparisons, the observational data produced improbable results. For example, when evaluating outcomes of men who were treated with and without androgen deprivation for locally advanced prostate cancer, men who underwent androgen deprivation had higher prostate cancer mortality (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.92) despite clinical trial evidence that this treatment improves cancer mortality. Controlling for comorbidity, extent of disease, and other characteristics by multivariate analyses or by propensity analyses had remarkably small impact on these improbable results.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggested that the results from observational studies of treatment outcomes should be viewed with caution.

Substantial increase in the use of adjuvant systemic treatment for early stage breast cancer reflects changes in guidelines in the period 1990-2006 in the southeastern Netherlands

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated trends in adjuvant systemic treatment among breast cancer patients and analyzed the factors on which treatment choice was based.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in 1990-2006 were selected from the registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (n=8261). The probability of receiving therapy was determined per characteristic for the periods 1990-1997, 1998-2001 and 2002-2006, separately.

RESULTS

The use of any adjuvant systemic treatment increased from 37% in 1990-1997 to 51% in 1998-2001 and 53% in 2002-2006 (p for trend < 0.0001). In the period 1990-1997, lymph node status (positive vs. negative: probability ratio (PR=25.8; 95% CI, 16.5-40.4) and age ( 60 vs. 35 years: PR=0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.02) were the main determinants of the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. From 1998 onwards, age remained the most important factor in decreasing the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. During 1990-1997 the use of hormonal therapy was mainly determined by positive lymph node status (PR=35; 95% CI, 25-49) and age ( 70 vs. 35 years: PR=9.3; 95% CI, 4.4-20), whereas positive hormone receptor status mainly affected hormonal therapy use (PR=17; 95% CI, 10-28) in the period 2002-2006. Marked differences were observed between hospitals in the adoption of adjuvant systemic treatment for node-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of patient and tumour characteristics on treatment choice varied over time, reflecting major changes in the Dutch treatment guidelines. Patients older than 70 years received almost no chemotherapy.

Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: how much is explained by screening, tumor severity, biology, treatment, comorbidities, and demographics?

BACKGROUND

The reasons for race/ethnicity (R/E) differences in breast cancer survival have been difficult to disentangle.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data were used to identify 41,020 women aged > or =68 years with incident breast cancer between 1994-1999 including African American (2479), Hispanic (1172), Asian/Pacific Island (1086), and white women (35,878). A Cox proportional hazards model assessed overall and stage-specific (0/I, II/III, and IV) R/E differences in breast cancer survival after adjusting for mammography screening, tumor characteristics at diagnosis, biologic markers, treatment, comorbidity, and demographics.

RESULTS

African American women had worse survival than white women, although controlling for predictor variables reduced this difference among all stage breast cancer (hazards ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.97-1.20). Adjustment for predictors reduced, but did not eliminate, disparities in the analysis limited to women diagnosed with stage II/III disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.54). Screening mammography, tumor characteristics at diagnosis, biologic markers, and treatment each produced a similar reduction in HRs for women with stage II/III cancers. Asian and Pacific Island women had better survival than white women before and after accounting for all predictors (adjusted all stages HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]; adjusted stage II/III HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]). Hispanic women had better survival than white women in all and stage II/III analysis (all stage HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.04) and stage II/III analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.04), although these findings did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in survival by R/E noted among women diagnosed with stage IV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictor variables contribute to, but do not fully explain, R/E differences in breast cancer survival for elderly American women. Future analyses should further investigate the role of biology, demographics, and disparities in quality of care.

Surveillance mammography and the risk of death among elderly breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To examine the benefits of mammography for elderly breast cancer survivors in community settings.

METHODS

Using the 1991-1999 linked SEER-Medicare data, we examined if mammography reduced the risk of breast-cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among women age 66 or older who were diagnosed with first primary breast cancer (FPBC) at stages 0-III and survived at least 30 months. To analyze the influence of mammography (both within one year and within two years prior to death/censoring) on the risk of breast-cancer-specific mortality, we compared women who died of breast cancer (cases) with women who died of other causes or were censored (controls). For an analysis of all-cause mortality, we compared women who died from any cause (cases) with women who were censored (controls). Propensity scores were used to adjust for tumor-related, treatment-related, and sociodemographic confounders.

RESULTS

Among 1351 breast cancer deaths (cases) and 5,262 controls, women who had a mammogram during a one or two-year time interval were less likely to die from breast cancer than women who did not have any mammograms during this time period in propensity-score-adjusted analysis (within one year odds ratio [OR]: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.95; within two years OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.92). Similarly, risk of all-cause mortality was reduced among women who had mammograms during one- or two-year intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

In community settings, mammography use during a one- or two-year time interval was associated with a small-reduced risk of breast-cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among elderly breast cancer survivors.

Clinical epidemiology of breast cancer in the elderly

Breast cancer will increasingly become a disease affecting the lives of older women, especially in more developed countries, the prevalence rising up to 7% over age 70 in the near future. A review of the population-based literature and an analysis of the data of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and European data regarding the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis showed that the proportion with unstaged and advanced disease (stages III and IV) is higher among elderly patients compared to younger ones and that their treatment is generally less aggressive, although the proportion receiving chemotherapy is increasing since the early 1990s. Disease specific (or relative) survival of elderly breast cancer patients is generally lower and the prevalence of serious (life expectancy affecting) co-morbidity is higher (>50% in patients over age 70). Because of large individual variations in physical and mental conditions, limited evidence from RCTs and personal preferences prevailing in the decision-making process, treatment of older breast cancer patients seems difficult to fit into guidelines. Therefore, alternative research strategies are needed to understand and improve the care for the elderly breast cancer population, such as descriptive (registry-based) studies and a qualitative, individual-based approach.

Congestive Heart Failure in Older Women Treated With Adjuvant Anthracycline Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Purpose

Limited data are available on long-term cardiac safety of adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in breast cancer patients over age 65 years. We evaluated rates and predictors of congestive heart failure (CHF) in this population.

Patients and Methods

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database and included women with no history of CHF who were age 66 to 80 years and diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer from 1992 to 2002. Cumulative rates of CHF were estimated, and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with the development of CHF.

Results

A total of 43,338 women were included. Anthracycline-treated women were younger, with fewer comorbidities and more advanced disease than women who received nonanthracycline or no chemotherapy (P < .001 for each). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for CHF was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.42) for women aged 66 to 70 treated with anthracycline compared with other chemotherapy. For women aged 71 to 80, adjuvant chemotherapy type was not associated with CHF. The following baseline characteristics were significant predictors of CHF: age (HR, 1.79 per 10 years; 95% CI, 1.66 to 1.93), black race (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.50), trastuzumab treatment (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.77), hypertension (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.52), diabetes (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.66 to 1.83), and coronary artery disease (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.79). Left-sided radiotherapy did not confer an elevated risk of CHF (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.11).

Conclusion

Women aged 66 to 70 years who received adjuvant anthracyclines had significantly higher rates of CHF. The difference in rates of CHF continued to increase through more than 10 years of follow-up.

Older women with operable breast cancer are less likely to have surgery

Background

Older women are less likely to receive standard management for breast cancer than younger postmenopausal women. Whether differences in general health explain variations in the rates of surgery is not known.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 76 women aged 65 years or more attending breast units in Greater Manchester completed a survey measuring functional status (Elderly Population Health Status Survey's Activity of Daily Living), generic health status (Short Form 12) and health-related quality of life (European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30). Case-note review assessed co-morbidity (Charlson Index) and management. Primary surgery for operable breast cancer was investigated using logistic regression.

Results

A Charlson Index of 1 or more did not predict the use of surgery (P = 0·363). However, for each point increase on the 1–4 scale indicating worsening functional status, the odds of having surgery decreased by 16 times (odds ratio 0·063). The odds of a woman of 80 years or more having surgery decreased by a factor of 44 (odds ratio 0·023) compared with women aged 65–79 years, accounting for co-morbidity, functional status, pretreatment stage, social deprivation and type of hospital.

Conclusion

Older women were less likely to have surgery for operable breast cancer than younger women, even after accounting for differences in general health and co-morbidity.

Non-standard management of breast cancer increases with age in the UK: a population based cohort of women > or =65 years

Evidence suggests that compared to younger women, older women are less likely to receive standard management for breast cancer. Whether this disparity persists once differences in tumour characteristics have been adjusted for has not been investigated in the UK. A retrospective cohort study involving case note review was undertaken, based on the North Western Cancer Registry database of women aged > or =65 years, resident in Greater Manchester with invasive breast cancer registered over a 1-year period (n=480). Adjusting for tumour characteristics associated with age by logistic regression analyses, older women were less likely to receive standard management than younger women for all indicators investigated. Compared to women aged 65-69 years, women aged > or =80 years with operable (stage 1-3a) breast cancer have increased odds of not receiving triple assessment (OR=5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1-14.5), not receiving primary surgery (OR=43.0, 95% CI: 9.7-191.3), not undergoing axillary node surgery (OR=27.6, 95% CI: 5.6-135.9) and not undergoing tests for steroid receptors (OR=3.0, 95% CI: 1.7-5.5). Women aged 75-79 years have increased odds of not receiving radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery compared to women aged 65-69 years (OR=11.0, 95% CI: 2.0-61.6). These results demonstrate that older women in the UK are less likely to receive standard management for breast cancer, compared to younger women and this disparity cannot be explained by differences in tumour characteristics.

Variations in chemotherapy and radiation therapy in a large nationwide and community-based cohort of elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the variations in the use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in a large nationwide and population-based cohort of older patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of 13,570 patients diagnosed with incident NHL at age > or =65 in 1992 through 1999 identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked database.

RESULTS

Of 13,570 patients with NHL, 52% received chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis. A higher proportion (61%) of patients aged 65 to 69 received chemotherapy than those > or =80 (39%). Forty-three percent of black patients received chemotherapy compared with whites (52%) and other ethnicities (54%). A greater proportion of patients with lower comorbidity scores received chemotherapy than those with higher comorbidity scores. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant association between the receipt of chemotherapy and gender or year of diagnosis, but blacks had statistically significant lower odds of receiving chemotherapy than white patients (odds ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.80). Significant predictors of receiving chemotherapy were age, ethnicity, comorbidity, tumor stage, nodal site, geographic area, and radiation therapy. The percentages of patients receiving radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or both were 11%, 39%, and 13%, respectively; 37% of patients with NHL did not receive any of these treatments within 6 months of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

There were significant variations in the use of chemotherapy by patient and tumor characteristics and geographic areas. A substantial number of patients with NHL did not receive either chemotherapy or radiation therapy, suggesting that the rate for receipt of these therapies may be improved.

Selective Application of Axillary Node Dissection in Elderly Women with Early Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Routine use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been questioned in elderly women. This study examines whether selective application of ALND in early stage breast cancer affects breast cancer-related survival.

METHODS

From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, records of women >or=70 years of age with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 1995 were reviewed. Hazard ratios (HR) of cause-specific survival (CSS) between women receiving ALND and those who did not were compared. To minimize the potential for bias in the selection of women to receive ALND, HR of CSS was compared within propensity analysis deciles.

RESULTS

20,151 women entered the analysis. Median follow up was 6 years (interquartile range 4.33-7.67 years). Seventy-five percent underwent ALND. Women with higher risk disease and younger age were more likely to undergo ALND. Five year unadjusted CSS in women who did and did not receive ALND was 92.1% and 90.6%, respectively, with a HR of 0.85, P = 0.002. Using the propensity analysis method, the adjusted HR for CSS associated with ALND was 0.89, P = 0.066.

DISCUSSION

After adjusting for differences in the probability of receiving ALND, no clinically or statistically significant difference in survival was observed among women who received ALND when compared with those who did not, although we could not account for differences in co-morbidity or use of systemic therapy between groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons select elderly women with early stage breast cancer for ALND with a negligible impact on CSS.

Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in older women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: assessing outcome in a population-based, observational cohort

PURPOSE

For older breast cancer patients, there is limited evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy from randomized clinical trials. Our goal was to assess the relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in a large, population-based cohort of older women with hormone receptor (HR) -negative breast cancer.

METHODS

We identified women age 66 and older diagnosed with HR-negative, nonmetastatic breast cancer from 1992 to 1999 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Chemotherapy use was identified in Medicare claims linked to SEER records. Clinical and sociodemographic predictors of chemotherapy use were identified using logistic regression. The effect of chemotherapy on survival was evaluated using propensity score methods and multivariable proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 1,711 (34%) of 5,081 women with HR-negative breast cancer received chemotherapy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis. Chemotherapy use decreased with increasing age and comorbidity, and increased with year of diagnosis, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, and higher tumor grade. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a mortality reduction of approximately 15% whether analyzed using propensity scores or standard multivariable methods. The greatest overall survival benefit was observed in patients with node-positive disease and in the node-negative patients most likely to receive chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with HR-negative breast cancer. The benefit of chemotherapy is most pronounced in the patients most likely to be selected for treatment, including those with involved lymph nodes or other high-risk disease characteristics.

Use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine patterns and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy use in a population-based cohort of older women with primary breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database who met the following criteria: age > or = 65 years, stage I to III breast cancer, and diagnosis between 1991 and 1999. Adjuvant chemotherapy use was ascertained by Common Procedural Terminology J codes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with chemotherapy use. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard of death for women with and without chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 41,390 women met study criteria, of whom 4,500 (10.9%) received chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy more than doubled during the 1990s, from 7.4% in 1991 to 16.3% in 1999 (P < .0001), with a significant shift toward anthracycline use. Women who were younger, white, with lower comorbidity scores, more advanced stage disease, and estrogen receptor (ER) -negative disease were significantly more likely to receive chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival among women with lymph node-negative (LN) disease or LN-positive, ER-positive disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.31). However, among women with LN-positive, ER-negative breast cancer, chemotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.96). A similar significant benefit of chemotherapy was seen in the subset of women age 70 years or older (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97).

CONCLUSION

In this observational cohort, chemotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among older women with ER-negative, LN-positive breast cancer.

Retrospective study of the effect of comorbidity on use of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer in a tertiary care setting

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer decreases with increasing age. We examined the effect of comorbidity on adjuvant chemotherapy use in older women (age >55 years) in a tertiary care Oncology Clinic. Clinic charts of new, early stage breast cancer patients over age 55 were reviewed. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the effect of age (55-64 versus > or =65 years), tumor stage, and comorbidity (Charlson score) on management. Two hundred and seventy-three charts were reviewed. Older women had a greater mean Charlson comorbidity score (0.72 versus 0.21; p<0.001). Tamoxifen use was similar in both groups (82.8% versus 81.1%, p=0.72). Chemotherapy was less frequently used in older women, regardless of nodal status: overall, 13.1% versus 45.6%, p<0.001; node-negative, 8.2% versus 32.1%, p<0.001; and node-positive, 25% versus 83.8%, p<0.001. In a multivariate analysis, lower stage, older age, and higher comorbidity were predictive of less frequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Though higher comorbidity was associated with less use of adjuvant chemotherapy, it did not totally account for the low use of chemotherapy in older compared to younger women. More work should be planned to dissect out specific reasons for differences in treatment by age.

Temporal and geographic variation in the use of hematopoietic growth factors in older women receiving breast cancer chemotherapy: findings from a large population-based cohort

PURPOSE

Hematopoietic growth factors have played a major role in preventing infection and shortening the duration of neutropenia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Little information is available on how these growth factors are used in patients with cancer outside the clinical trial setting. We performed descriptive and exploratory analyses on the patterns and correlates of the use of hematopoietic growth factors in community-dwelling elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 5,843 women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data cohorts who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age 65 or older in 1992 to 1999 from the 11 SEER areas and received chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 17.3% of the elderly women with breast cancer chemotherapy received filgrastim and 6.8% received epoetin. The use of the growth factors increased significantly over time from 1992 to 1999 (P < .001 for trend). Compared with patients diagnosed in 1992 to 1994, patients diagnosed in 1998 to 1999 were more than five times and 65 times more likely to receive filgrastim and epoetin, respectively, after controlling for other factors such as age and comorbidity. There also was substantial geographic variation in the use of hematopoietic growth factors, ranging from 10.6% in Seattle to 22.9% in Atlanta. Significant predictors of growth factors included patient age, race, tumor stage, and comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

There were substantial temporal and geographic variations in the use of hematopoietic growth factors among patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. The nationwide and population-based Medicare claims provide potential for examining the effectiveness, medical costs, and cost effectiveness of hematopoietic growth factors in the community.

External Validation of Medicare Claims for Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Compared With Medical Chart Reviews

BACKGROUND

Although Medicare claims data have been increasingly used to examine the patterns and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy, their external validity has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to validate Medicare claims for chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We completed medical chart reviews for 1228 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age 65 and older between 1993 and 1999 in New Mexico that were linked with Medicare claims data, achieving an estimated sensitivity of more than 90% and a 0.05 level of precision.

RESULTS

Of the 150 subjects identified by Medicare claims as receiving chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis, 75% were confirmed by medical records as having received chemotherapy. Of the remaining 25% of cases without chart verification, (1) 33 cases had 7 or more claims for chemotherapy and also had specific chemotherapy drugs indicated in Medicare data, representing 22% (33/150) of all cases that received chemotherapy according to Medicare claims and (2) 4 cases had 1 to 6 claims for chemotherapy, representing 3% (4/150) of all cases with claims for chemotherapy. Of those 1078 subjects who did not receive chemotherapy according to Medicare claims, more than 99% were confirmed by chart reviews. Observed agreement on chemotherapy between Medicare claims and chart reviews was 94% and overall reliability (kappa) was 0.69 (95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Of cases identified as receiving chemotherapy by Medicare claims, 97% had strong evidence and only 3% had weak evidence for receiving this therapy.

Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts

OBJECTIVES

Tumor stage, age, and cell type are well-characterized predictors for cervical cancer survival; socioeconomic factors may also play an important role. The purpose of this study is to estimate cervical cancer survival by socioeconomic indicators and race/ethnicity among elderly women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

METHODS

We studied 1251 women with cervical cancer aged 65 or older, identified between 1992 and 1999 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]-Medicare linked data. All women had similar access to care through Medicare fee-for-services insurance. A composite measure of socioeconomic status was created using census tract level data for poverty, education, and income. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used for all-cause and cervical cancer-specific survival analysis.

RESULTS

Increased age (P < 0.0001) and advanced tumor stage (<0.0001) were associated with poorer all-cause and cervical cancer-specific survival. After adjustment for age, stage, and treatment, increased co-morbidity scores and having non-squamous cervical cancer were associated with poorer all-cause survival (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, women receiving hysterectomy vs. no surgery or any treatment had significantly better all-cause and cervical cancer-specific survival. Socioeconomic factors were not associated with either all-cause (P for trend = 0.79) or cervical cancer-specific (P for trend = 0.81) survival. No racial/ethnic differences in all-cause or cervical cancer-specific survival were observed after adjusting for socioeconomic factors.

CONCLUSION

Among women with similar access to care, neither minority race/ethnicity nor poorer socioeconomic status were associated with poorer survival in this large sample of older women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer. Presence of co-morbid conditions and treatment were important predictors of cervical cancer survival.

Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive operable breast cancer in older women

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have shown the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in treating node-positive operable breast cancer in women aged < or = 69 years, but the benefit of chemotherapy in women aged > or = 70 is questionable. This study was to examine if adjuvant chemotherapy is effective for these women with breast cancer.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 5464 women diagnosed with node-positive operable breast cancer at age > or = 65 in 1992 through 1996 with last follow-up of December 31, 1999 in five states and six metropolitan areas. Hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was used for survival analysis with adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics; propensity analysis was used to control for observed factors; and sensitivity analysis was used to estimate potential effects of unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

After adjusting for propensity to receive chemotherapy, the chemotherapy-treated and untreated groups were not statistically significantly different for covariates except for age and hormone receptor status. Mortality was significantly reduced in women aged 65-69 who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (HR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.88) or after adjusting for propensity scores (HR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). HR did not significantly differ between the treated and untreated women aged > or = 70 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.83-1.09, and HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.87-1.14). These results were relatively insensitive to changes in unmeasured confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in women with node-positive operable breast cancer aged 65-69 living in the community, but not in women aged > or = 70. These findings are consistent with those found in randomized controlled trials.

Information on chemotherapy and hormone therapy from tumor registry had moderate agreement with chart reviews

BACKGROUND

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries provide accurate information on cancer surgery and radiation, but the validity of registry data on chemotherapy and hormone therapy for breast cancer has not been well studied. We validated the registry data for chemotherapy and hormone therapy against an independent medical chart review.

METHODS

We identified 1,228 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age > or = 65 in 1993-1999 in the New Mexico SEER Tumor Registry and completed medical chart reviews.

RESULTS

Overall, there was moderate agreement between these two databases on chemotherapy that was received within 6 months of diagnosis. The observed agreement was 96.0%, with a kappa of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.79). The sensitivity of the registry data for chemotherapy was 70.7% and the specificity was 98.2%. The positive predictive value of the registry data for chemotherapy was 77.8%. The sensitivity of the registry data for hormone therapy was 59.7%, and the specificity was 89.5%. The observed agreement for hormone therapy was 80.0%, with a kappa of 0.52 (0.46-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Agreement on chemotherapy and hormone therapy between the New Mexico SEER Tumor Registry and chart reviews was moderate. The preferred approach would be to combine data from different sources to obtain more complete information.

Variation in modes of chemotherapy administration for breast carcinoma and association with hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicity

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge, few studies to date have addressed the patterns of how chemotherapy was administered (administration modes) over time. In the current study, the goal of the authors was to describe how chemotherapy for breast carcinoma was administered and to determine whether chemotherapy administration modes were associated with toxicity in a community-based large cohort.

METHODS

The authors studied 5256 women who were diagnosed with breast carcinoma at age 65 years or older between 1992-1999 and received chemotherapy. The patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)Program-Medicare linked databases. Chemotherapy drugs and modes of administration were determined through procedure codes in Medicare claims.

RESULTS

Of the 5256 patients who received chemotherapy, 33% received it through an intravenous infusion for less than 1 hour; 39% through an intravenous infusion lasting 1-8 hours; 15% through an intravenous infusion lasting longer than 8 hours and requiring a pump; 12% through an intravenous push technique; and 1% through a subcutaneous, intramuscular, or intralesional injection. These modes varied substantially across the 11 SEER areas. The risks of hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicities (neutropenia, fever, thrombocytopenia, and adverse effects of systemic therapy) were not found to be significantly associated with different modes of chemotherapy after adjusting for other factors. Compared with patients receiving 5-flurouracil using an intravenous infusion for longer than 8 hours, the risk of toxicity was determined to be 0.96 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.63-1.47) for patients treated with an intravenous infusion lasting 1-8 hours; 0.94 (95% CI, 0.62-1.41) for patients treated with an intravenous infusion lasting less than 1 hour; and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.38-1.08) for patients treated with subcutaneous, intramuscular, or intralesional injection or an intravenous push technique.

CONCLUSIONS

There were substantial geographic variations noted in the modes of administering chemotherapy; however, these variations did not appear to be associated with the risk of toxicities (neutropenia, fever, thrombocytopenia, and adverse effects of systemic therapy).

The Influence of Marital Status on the Stage at Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival of Older Women with Breast Cancer

Research indicates an association between marital status and health but this link has not been thoroughly explored. Our goal was to examine the association of marital status on the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer and the potential role socioeconomic status, education level, and comorbidities may play in explaining these associations. Retrospective cohort study using linked Medicare and National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. The sample consisted of 32,268 women aged 65 years and older who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 1991 to 1995. Information available through 1998 allowed for 3 years of follow-up. Results showed that unmarried women were more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer stage II-IV versus stage I and in situ (OR 1.17; CI95 1.12, 1.23). Unmarried women diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer were less likely to receive definitive therapy (OR 1.24; CI95 1.17, 1.31). Even after controlling for cancer stage and size at diagnosis and treatment received, unmarried women were at an increased risk of death from breast cancer (HR 1.25; CI95 1.14, 1.37). Socioeconomic variables and comorbidity had little impact on the relationship between marital status and survival. Older married women were at decreased risk for mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Many of the health benefits enjoyed by married women are likely derived from increased social support and social networks.

The quality of chemotherapy and its quality assurance

AIMS

Assessment of the quality of chemotherapy care and its quality assurance in clinical trials and daily practice.

METHODS

Using Medline, literature was searched combining the following words: quality assurance or quality of care, combined with anti-neoplastic agents. The bibliography of each article was reviewed for additional literature. Those reports in English, French, German or Dutch focusing quality assurance or quality of care and chemotherapy were selected.

RESULTS

One hundred and five articles were selected by Medline and after review and adding of additional literature 53 articles remained. In clinical trials information on quality of chemotherapy is sparse. Different cooperative groups reported on suboptimal dosing, suboptimal registration of chemotherapy and several trials indicated that suboptimal dosing led to impaired outcome. Most quality assurance activities in clinical trials are concerned with audit and feedback and on-site visits. In daily practice the quality of chemotherapy is mostly impaired by the fact that it is not given although indicated and if it is given non-evidence based chemotherapy or administration schedules and reduced dose intensity decrease the quality of care. Especially, age, comorbidity and socio-economic status reduce the chance of receiving good quality of care regarding chemotherapy. Activities mostly used for quality assurance are generation of guidelines, specialisation and multidisciplinary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Most quality assurance activities in clinical trials and daily practice are directed to structure and process parameters. More evidence that quality of care is related to outcome should be sought. Quality assurance in daily practice should aim at guideline implementation, specialisation and multidisciplinary care and should pay attention especially to the older patients, patients with comorbidity and patients from lower socio-economic classes.

Community-based assessment of adjuvant hormone therapy in women with breast cancer, 1991-1997

This study used population-based tumor registry data to describe the patterns of adjuvant hormone therapy and to examine the correlates of hormone therapy for women with breast cancer. The study population included 5101 women (age 20 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 1991 through 1997 in the entire state of New Mexico. Overall, 32% of women with stage I, II, or IIIA breast cancer received adjuvant hormone therapy. The likelihood of receiving adjuvant hormone therapy increased with tumor stage at diagnosis. Women less than 50 years of age were significantly less likely to receive adjuvant hormone therapy compared to those age 50 to 54 years, but there was no significant difference in the use of adjuvant hormone therapy for women age 55 years and older. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy was influenced by hormone receptor status and lymph node status. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were also more likely to receive adjuvant hormone therapy than those who did not. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy alone was relatively stable over time and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy alone increased, but the receipt of chemotherapy combined with hormone therapy decreased from 1991 to 1997. There was no significant difference with age in the use of adjuvant hormone therapy among 55-year-old women compared to those age 50 to 54 years, whereas women less than 50 years of age were significantly less likely to receive this therapy. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy varied significantly by tumor stage, lymph node status, hormone receptor status, and the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Biweekly administration of gemcitabine and vinorelbine as first line therapy in elderly advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine both as a single agent or associated are active in advanced breast cancer patients as second line therapy, with low toxicity. In the elderly patients polichemotherapy is difficult for co-morbidity, but results with monotherapy are fewer. The use of this association as first line could be of help.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients over 65 were treated with 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 25 mg/m2 of vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. An analysis of toxicities, TTP and OS were performed.

RESULTS

The ORR was 53%: a CR was obtained in five patients (15%) and a PR in 13 patients (38%). Moreover, seven patients (21%) had a stable disease maintained for 6 months. The mean duration of CR and PR were, respectively, of 10 (range 7-19) and 7 (range: 4-14), months. Toxicity was low, mainly haematological: grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred only in 7 (20%) cases without febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination shows significant activity in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients. The treatment is well tolerated and has an acceptable toxicity profile.