1
|
Minozzi S, Ambrosi L, Saulle R, Uhm SS, Terplan M, Sinclair JM, Agabio R. Psychosocial and medication interventions to stop or reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 4:CD015042. [PMID: 38682758 PMCID: PMC11057221 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015042.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the known harms, alcohol consumption is common in pregnancy. Rates vary between countries, and are estimated to be 10% globally, with up to 25% in Europe. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of psychosocial interventions and medications to reduce or stop alcohol consumption during pregnancy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register (via CRSLive), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, from inception to 8 January 2024. We also searched for ongoing and unpublished studies via ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references of topic-related systematic reviews and included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials that compared medications or psychosocial interventions, or both, to placebo, no intervention, usual care, or other medications or psychosocial interventions used to reduce or stop alcohol use during pregnancy. Our primary outcomes of interest were abstinence from alcohol, reduction in alcohol consumption, retention in treatment, and women with any adverse event. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS We included eight studies (1369 participants) in which pregnant women received an intervention to stop or reduce alcohol use during pregnancy. In one study, almost half of participants had a current diagnosis of alcohol use disorder (AUD); in another study, 40% of participants had a lifetime diagnosis of AUD. Six studies took place in the USA, one in Spain, and one in the Netherlands. All included studies evaluated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions; we did not find any study that evaluated the efficacy of medications for the treatment of AUD during pregnancy. Psychosocial interventions were mainly brief interventions ranging from a single session of 10 to 60 minutes to five sessions of 10 minutes each. Pregnant women received the psychosocial intervention approximately at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy, and the outcome of alcohol use was reassessed 8 to 24 weeks after the psychosocial intervention. Women in the control group received treatment as usual (TAU) or similar treatments such as comprehensive assessment of alcohol use and advice to stop drinking during pregnancy. Globally, we found that, compared to TAU, psychosocial interventions may increase the rate of continuously abstinent participants (risk ratio (RR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.57; I2 =0%; 3 studies; 378 women; low certainty evidence). Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on the number of drinks per day, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference -0.42, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.28; I2 = 86%; 2 studies; 157 women; very low certainty evidence). Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on the number of women who completed treatment (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.02; I2 = 0%; 7 studies; 1283 women; moderate certainty evidence). None of the included studies assessed adverse events of treatments. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision of the estimates. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Brief psychosocial interventions may increase the rate of continuous abstinence among pregnant women who report alcohol use during pregnancy. Further studies should be conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of psychosocial interventions and other treatments (e.g. medications) for women with AUD. These studies should provide detailed information on alcohol use before and during pregnancy using consistent measures such as the number of drinks per drinking day. When heterogeneous populations are recruited, more detailed information on alcohol use during pregnancy should be provided to allow future systematic reviews to be conducted. Other important information that would enhance the usefulness of these studies would be the presence of other comorbid conditions such as anxiety, mood disorders, and the use of other psychoactive substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Ambrosi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Rosella Saulle
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Seilin S Uhm
- School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mishka Terplan
- Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, USA
- Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Roberta Agabio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang W, Chih H, Chikritzhs T. Predicting Alcohol Consumption Patterns for Individuals with a User-Friendly Parsimonious Statistical Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2581. [PMID: 36767944 PMCID: PMC9914951 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Many studies on the relationship between alcohol and health outcome focus primarily on average consumption over time and do not consider how heavy per-occasion drinking may influence apparent relationships. Improved methods concerning the most recent drinking occasion are essential to inform the extent of alcohol-related health problems. We aimed to develop a user-friendly and readily replicable computational model that predicts: (i) an individual's probability of consuming alcohol ≥2, 3, 4… drinks; and (ii) the total number of days during which consumption is ≥2, 3, 4… drinks over a specified period. Data from the 2010 and 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) were used to develop and validate the model. Predictors used in model development were age, gender, usual number of drinks consumed per day, and number of drinking days in the past 30 days. Main outcomes were number of drinks consumed on the last drinking occasion in the past 30 days, and number of days of risky levels of consumption. The area under ROC curves ranged between 0.86 and 0.91 when predicting the number of drinks consumed. Coefficients were very close to 1 for all outcomes, indicating closeness between the predicted and observed values. This straightforward modelling approach can be easily adopted by public health behavioral studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbin Liang
- School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350108, China
- Menzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Tiwi, NT 0810, Australia
- National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
| | - HuiJun Chih
- Curtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
| | - Tanya Chikritzhs
- National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agiresaasi A, Nassanga G, Maina GW, Kiguli J, Nabiwemba E, Kiwanuka N, Mukose A, Tumwesigye NM. Effect of a communication intervention on alcohol use during pregnancy in post conflict Northern Uganda: a quasi experimental study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:80. [PMID: 36503676 PMCID: PMC9743753 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00505-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use during pregnancy is a preventable risk factor for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum disorders. Psycho-social and educational interventions have been reported to enable women reduce alcohol intake levels during pregnancy and help improve some health outcomes of unhealthy alcohol use. We set out to assess the effect of a communication intervention on alcohol use during pregnancy in post conflict northern Uganda. METHODS The study employed a quasi - experimental design to assess the effect of a community health worker led communication strategy on pregnant women's knowledge, attitudes and various patterns of alcohol use using Difference in Difference(DiD). 420 respondents were recruited at baseline as at endline. RESULTS The communication messages were significantly associated with reduced odds of binge drinking (P = 0.018; OR = 0.09; CI = 0.012-0.66). Also those who received the intervention were less likely to drink frequently (P = 0.80; OR = 0.75; 95%CI = 0.074-7.5) or be harmful alcohol users(P = 0.948). The intervention also positively influenced having fair (β =0.49;P = 0.217;RRR =1.63)or adequate knowledge(β = 0.89;P = 0.25;RRR = 2.44) and having positive(β = 0.37;RRR =1.44;P = 0.46) or fair attitude(β = 0.19;RRR = 1.21; P = 0.693) although not to a significant level. CONCLUSIONS The communication intervention affected some patterns of alcohol use among pregnant women and not others. Our results contribute to existing evidence that communication interventions are a promising approach in reduction of alcohol exposed pregnancies. Interventions aimed at promoting alcohol abstinence during pregnancy should be implemented alongside other strategies that address factors that influence pregnant women to drink to achieve maximum results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apophia Agiresaasi
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Goretti Nassanga
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Journalism and Communication, School of Language, Literature and Communication, Makerere University College of Social Sciences and Humanities, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Gakenia Wamuyu Maina
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Juliet Kiguli
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Elizabeth Nabiwemba
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Noah Kiwanuka
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Aggrey Mukose
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| | - Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye
- grid.11194.3c0000 0004 0620 0548Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.0 Box, 7062 Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adiri CO, Asimadu EE, Nwafor MI, Nweze SO, Ukaegbe CI. Perception of safety and consumption of alcoholic beverages during pregnancy. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:3021-3025. [PMID: 36168942 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2125795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This cross-sectional study of antenatal clinic attendees aimed to determine the proportions of pregnant women that consider different alcoholic beverages safe for their babies; and the proportions that took them in the index pregnancy. Five hundred and six women completed the questionnaires. Mean age was 30.07 ± 5.13 years. Mean parity was 1.44 ± 1.32. 478 (94.5%) were married. Three hundred and eighty-three (75.69%) had tertiary education. These proportions did not consider these alcoholic beverages harmful in pregnancy: palm wine 35.77%, stout 17.03%, beer 14.03%, alcoholic wine 13.83%, ogogoro (distilled fermented palm wine) 13.04% and gin/spirits 9.88%. The proportion that consumed different alcoholic beverages during pregnancy were: palm wine 17.20%, beer 5.33%, alcoholic wine 4.35%, stout 4.15%, ogogoro 1.58% and gin/spirits 0.59%. Pregnant women who considered various alcoholic beverages safe in pregnancy were significantly more likely to consume them during pregnancy. Healthcare providers should assess women's perception of the safety of different alcoholic beverages and offer counselling to discourage their consumption during pregnancy.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Babies exposed to alcohol in pregnancy are at increased risk of developing foetal alcohol spectrum disorders. No safe level of alcohol has been established for pregnancy. The level of alcohol consumption by pregnant women is still high in our practice environment.What do the results of this study add? The perception that a specific alcoholic beverage is safe and not harmful to the foetus, significantly increases the likelihood of the consumption of that alcoholic beverage by a pregnant woman.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Healthcare workers will need to enquire about specific alcoholic beverages especially those common within their practice environment. An enquiry should be made on the perception of safety and their consumption during pregnancy. Women who perceive certain alcoholic beverages are more likely to consume them during pregnancy and hence should receive specific counselling on the alcoholic content of these beverages and the risk to their babies to discourage the consumption of that alcoholic beverage during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C O Adiri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Ituku-Ozalla Campus, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria
| | - E E Asimadu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Ituku-Ozalla Campus, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria
| | - M I Nwafor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria
| | - S O Nweze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Parklane, Nigeria
| | - C I Ukaegbe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsang TW, Kingsland M, Doherty E, Wiggers J, Attia J, Wolfenden L, Dunlop A, Tully B, Symonds I, Rissel C, Lecathelinais C, Elliott EJ. Effectiveness of a practice change intervention in reducing alcohol consumption in pregnant women attending public maternity services. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:63. [PMID: 36045392 PMCID: PMC9429389 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00490-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a practice change intervention to support the implementation of guideline-recommended care for addressing alcohol use in pregnancy on self-reported alcohol use during pregnancy. Methods A randomized, stepped-wedge controlled trial in three clusters (sectors) within the Hunter New England Local Health District (NSW, Australia). We evaluated a practice change intervention that supported the introduction of a new model of care for reducing alcohol use in pregnancy, consistent with local and international guidelines, and implemented in random order across the sectors. Each week throughout the study period, pregnant women who attended any public antenatal services within the previous week, for a 27–28 or 35–36 week gestation visit, were randomly sampled and invited to participate in the survey. The intended intervention for all women was Brief advice (to abstain from alcohol and information about potential risks). Women identified as medium-risk alcohol consumers using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) were to be offered referral to a phone coaching service, and women identified as high-risk were to be offered referral to a Drug and Alcohol Service. Rates of self-reported alcohol use (AUDIT-C risk level and special occasion drinking) were summarized and compared in groups of women pre-intervention and post-intervention using multivariable logistic regression. Results Surveys were completed by 1309 women at pre-intervention and 2540 at post-intervention. The majority of women did not drink during pregnancy (pre-intervention: 89.68%; post-intervention: 90.74%). There was no change in the proportion of women classified as No risk from drinking (AUDIT-C score = 0) or Some risk from drinking (AUDIT-C score ≥ 1) pre- or post-intervention (p = 0.08). However, a significant reduction in special occasion drinking was observed (pre-intervention: 11.59%; post-intervention: 8.43%; p < 0.001). Conclusions Special occasion drinking was reduced following implementation of guideline-recommended care. Failure to change other patterns of alcohol use in pregnancy may reflect barriers to implementing the model of care in antenatal care settings and the need to address other social determinants of alcohol use. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12617000882325; date: 16 June 2017).
Collapse
|
6
|
Doherty E, Wiggers J, Nathan N, Hall A, Wolfenden L, Tully B, Elliott EJ, Attia J, Dunlop AJ, Symonds I, Tsang TW, Reeves P, McFadyen T, Wynne O, Kingsland M. Iterative delivery of an implementation support package to increase and sustain the routine provision of antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063486. [PMID: 35882461 PMCID: PMC9330336 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy is not routinely delivered in maternity services. Although a number of implementation trials have reported significant increases in such care, the majority of women still did not receive all recommended care elements, and improvements dissipated over time. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an iteratively developed and delivered implementation support package in: (1) increasing the proportion of pregnant women who receive antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption and (2) sustaining the rate of care over time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A stepped-wedge cluster trial will be conducted as a second phase of a previous trial. All public maternity services within three sectors of a local health district in Australia will receive an implementation support package that was developed based on an assessment of outcomes and learnings following the initial trial. The package will consist of evidence-based strategies to support increases in care provision (remind clinicians; facilitation; conduct educational meetings) and sustainment (develop a formal implementation blueprint; purposely re-examine the implementation; conduct ongoing training). Measurement of outcomes will occur via surveys with women who attend antenatal appointments each week. Primary outcomes will be the proportion of women who report being asked about alcohol consumption at subsequent antenatal appointments; and receiving complete care (advice and referral) relative to alcohol risk at initial and subsequent antenatal appointments. Economic and process evaluation measures will also be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained through the Hunter New England (16/11/16/4.07, 16/10/19/5.15) and University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committees (H-2017-0032, H-2016-0422) and the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (1236/16). Trial findings will be disseminated to health service decision makers to inform the feasibility of conducting additional cycles to further improve antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption as well as at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000295741).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doherty
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Nathan
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Clinical Research Design and Statistics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian John Dunlop
- Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Symonds
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tracey W Tsang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tameka McFadyen
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
- Thurru Indigenous Health Unit, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olivia Wynne
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barros H, Baia I, Monjardino T, Pimenta P, Alfredo A, Sorokina A, Domingues R. Fast-track referral for health interventions during pregnancy: study protocol of a randomised pragmatic experimental study to reduce low birth weight in Portugal (STOP LBW). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052964. [PMID: 35292492 PMCID: PMC8928251 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with a wide range of short-term and long-term consequences and is related to maternal psychosocial and behavioural determinants. The objective of this study is to estimate the effect of implementing fast-track referral for early intervention on psychosocial and behavioural risk factors-smoking, alcohol consumption, depression and physical violence-in reducing the incidence of LBW. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Parallel superiority pragmatic clinical trial randomised by clusters. Primary healthcare units (PHCU) located in Portugal will be randomised (1:1) to intervention or control groups. Pregnant women over 18 years of age attending these PHCU will be eligible to the study. Risk factors will be assessed through face-to-face interviews. In the intervention group, women who report at least one risk factor will have immediate access to referral services. The comparison group will be the local standard of care for these risk factors. We will use intention-to-treat analyses to compare intervention and control groups. We estimated a sample size of 2832 pregnant women to detect a 30% reduction in the incidence rate of LBW between the control and intervention groups. Secondary outcomes are the reduction of preterm births, reduction of the four risk factors and acceptance of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Public Health Institute of the University of Porto (no CE20140). The findings will be disseminated to the public, the funders, health professionals, health managers and other researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04866277.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrique Barros
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ines Baia
- Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Teresa Monjardino
- Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimenta
- Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Alfredo
- Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Anzhela Sorokina
- Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rosa Domingues
- Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/Aids, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce alcohol consumption among pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health 2021; 24:557-568. [PMID: 33404702 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-020-01100-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to synthesise the available evidence on psychological interventions to reduce alcohol consumption among pregnant and postpartum women. Six electronic databases were searched to identify controlled studies targeting pregnant and postpartum women who drink or are at risk of drinking due to previous patterns of alcohol use. Controlled quantitative studies such as randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were included. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles in English. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. In total, 12,610 records were screened, and 11 studies were eligible for inclusion (9 with pregnant women, 2 with postpartum women). All studies were randomised controlled trials. Five studies had positive or partially positive primary outcomes of reductions in drinking or abstinence, and their interventions ranged from multi-session brief interventions to self-help manuals based on cognitive behavioural components. All studies showed considerable methodological limitations. Psychological interventions may be effective in promoting abstinence or reducing alcohol consumption among pregnant and postpartum women. Interventions that demonstrated some efficacy showed higher level of engagement with pregnant women compared to studies which delivered interventions in a single session. Paucity of evidence, inconsistency of outcomes, large heterogeneity in the interventions and methodological weaknesses limit the ability to make final conclusions about the overall effectiveness of these interventions. Findings highlight the need for better quality research on this topic.
Collapse
|
9
|
Associations of education and work status with alcohol use and cessation among pregnant women in Japan: the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1400. [PMID: 34266393 PMCID: PMC8281686 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11461-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is inconsistent evidence on the associations of education and work status with alcohol use during pregnancy. Our aim was to examine the associations of education and work status with alcohol use and alcohol cessation during pregnancy in Japan. Methods Data were analyzed from 11,839 pregnant women who participated in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study from 2013 to 2017 in Japan. Women were dichotomized as current drinkers or non-drinkers in both early and middle pregnancy. Alcohol cessation was defined as alcohol use in early pregnancy, but not in middle pregnancy. Multivariable log-binomial regression analyses were conducted to examine associations of education and work status with alcohol use in early and middle pregnancy and alcohol cessation, adjusted for age and income. The prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by work status and education. Results The prevalence of alcohol use in early and middle pregnancy was 20.9 and 6.4%, respectively. Higher education was associated with alcohol use in early pregnancy both among working and non-working women; the PRs of university education or higher compared with high school education or lower were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.34–1.96) and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.16–1.45), respectively. Higher education was associated with alcohol cessation during pregnancy among working women; the corresponding PR was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01–1.17). Working was associated with alcohol use in early and middle pregnancy. Working was associated with a decreased probability of alcohol cessation among women with lower education but with an increased probability of alcohol cessation among women with higher education; the PRs of working compared with not working were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82–1.00) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.00–1.20), respectively. Conclusions Women with higher education were more likely to consume alcohol in early pregnancy and to cease alcohol use between early and middle pregnancy, especially working women. Working women were more likely to consume alcohol throughout pregnancy. Working women with lower education were less likely to cease alcohol use, whereas working women with higher education were more likely to cease alcohol use between early and middle pregnancy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11461-w.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ota E, da Silva Lopes K, Middleton P, Flenady V, Wariki WM, Rahman MO, Tobe-Gai R, Mori R. Antenatal interventions for preventing stillbirth, fetal loss and perinatal death: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 12:CD009599. [PMID: 33336827 PMCID: PMC8078228 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009599.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stillbirth is generally defined as a death prior to birth at or after 22 weeks' gestation. It remains a major public health concern globally. Antenatal interventions may reduce stillbirths and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in settings with high rates of stillbirth. There are several key antenatal strategies that aim to prevent stillbirth including nutrition, and prevention and management of infections. OBJECTIVES To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of antenatal interventions for preventing stillbirth for low risk or unselected populations of women. METHODS We collaborated with Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Information Specialist to identify all their published reviews that specified or reported stillbirth; and we searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (search date: 29 Feburary 2020) to identify reviews published within other Cochrane groups. The primary outcome measure was stillbirth but in the absence of stillbirth data, we used perinatal mortality (both stillbirth and death in the first week of life), fetal loss or fetal death as outcomes. Two review authors independently evaluated reviews for inclusion, extracted data and assessed quality of evidence using AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Reviews) and GRADE tools. We assigned interventions to categories with graphic icons to classify the effectiveness of interventions as: clear evidence of benefit or harm; clear evidence of no effect or equivalence; possible benefit or harm; or unknown benefit or harm or no effect or equivalence. MAIN RESULTS We identified 43 Cochrane Reviews that included interventions in pregnant women with the potential for preventing stillbirth; all of the included reviews reported our primary outcome 'stillbirth' or in the absence of stillbirth, 'perinatal death' or 'fetal loss/fetal death'. AMSTAR quality was high in 40 reviews with scores ranging from 8 to 11 and moderate in three reviews with a score of 7. Nutrition interventions Clear evidence of benefit: balanced energy/protein supplementation versus no supplementation suggests a probable reduction in stillbirth (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.94, 5 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 3408 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Clear evidence of no effect or equivalence for stillbirth or perinatal death: vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment; and multiple micronutrients with iron and folic acid versus iron with or without folic acid. Unknown benefit or harm or no effect or equivalence: for all other nutrition interventions examined the effects were uncertain. Prevention and management of infections Possible benefit for fetal loss or death: insecticide-treated anti-malarial nets versus no nets (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.97, 4 RCTs; low-certainty). Unknown evidence of no effect or equivalence: drugs for preventing malaria (stillbirth RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.36, 5 RCTs, 7130 women, moderate certainty in women of all parity; perinatal death RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.63, 4 RCTs, 5216 women, moderate-certainty in women of all parity). Prevention, detection and management of other morbidities Clear evidence of benefit: the following interventions suggest a reduction: midwife-led models of care in settings where the midwife is the primary healthcare provider particularly for low-risk pregnant women (overall fetal loss/neonatal death reduction RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99, 13 RCTs, 17,561 women; high-certainty), training versus not training traditional birth attendants in rural populations of low- and middle-income countries (stillbirth reduction odds ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.83, 1 RCT, 18,699 women, moderate-certainty; perinatal death reduction OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.83, 1 RCT, 18,699 women, moderate-certainty). Clear evidence of harm: a reduced number of antenatal care visits probably results in an increase in perinatal death (RR 1.14 95% CI 1.00 to 1.31, 5 RCTs, 56,431 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Clear evidence of no effect or equivalence: there was evidence of no effect in the risk of stillbirth/fetal loss or perinatal death for the following interventions and comparisons: psychosocial interventions; and providing case notes to women. Possible benefit: community-based intervention packages (including community support groups/women's groups, community mobilisation and home visitation, or training traditional birth attendants who made home visits) may result in a reduction of stillbirth (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91, 15 RCTs, 201,181 women; low-certainty) and perinatal death (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.86, 17 RCTs, 282,327 women; low-certainty). Unknown benefit or harm or no effect or equivalence: the effects were uncertain for other interventions examined. Screening and management of fetal growth and well-being Clear evidence of benefit: computerised antenatal cardiotocography for assessing infant's well-being in utero compared with traditional antenatal cardiotocography (perinatal mortality reduction RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.88, 2 RCTs, 469 women; moderate-certainty). Unknown benefit or harm or no effect or equivalence: the effects were uncertain for other interventions examined. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS While most interventions were unable to demonstrate a clear effect in reducing stillbirth or perinatal death, several interventions suggested a clear benefit, such as balanced energy/protein supplements, midwife-led models of care, training versus not training traditional birth attendants, and antenatal cardiotocography. Possible benefits were also observed for insecticide-treated anti-malarial nets and community-based intervention packages, whereas a reduced number of antenatal care visits were shown to be harmful. However, there was variation in the effectiveness of interventions across different settings, indicating the need to carefully understand the context in which these interventions were tested. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the effects of antenatal preventive interventions and which approaches are most effective to reduce the risk of stillbirth. Stillbirth (or fetal death), perinatal and neonatal death need to be reported separately in future RCTs of antenatal interventions to allow assessment of different interventions on these rare but important outcomes and they need to clearly define the target populations of women where the intervention is most likely to be of benefit. As the high burden of stillbirths occurs in low- and middle-income countries, further high-quality trials need to be conducted in these settings as a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Ota
- Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University , Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Philippa Middleton
- Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Windy Mv Wariki
- Faculty of Medicine, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, Indonesia
| | - Md Obaidur Rahman
- Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Rintaro Mori
- Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smoke and Alcohol Free with EHealth and Rewards (SAFER) pregnancy study: a before-after study protocol. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2020; 30:51. [PMID: 33208752 PMCID: PMC7674488 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-020-00209-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite existing interventions, tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy are common. The Smoke and Alcohol Free with EHealth and Rewards (SAFER) pregnancy intervention combines monthly group sessions, access to a web-based platform and incentives upon biochemically validated cessation for a maximum duration of 6 months to promote cessation of smoking and alcohol use before and during pregnancy. To inform development of the SAFER pregnancy intervention, two focus groups with the target population were held beforehand, with results reported here alongside the final SAFER pregnancy study protocol. In a before−after study we aim to include 66 women who are pregnant or have a wish to become pregnant and who smoke and/or consume alcohol (i.e. target population of the SAFER pregnancy intervention). The primary outcome measure is cessation of smoking and/or alcohol use at 34−38 weeks of gestation, or after six group sessions if women did not become pregnant during the study period. Secondary outcomes focus on the barriers and facilitators for implementation of the SAFER pregnancy intervention.
Collapse
|
12
|
Prevalence of Alcohol and Tobacco Use and Perceptions Regarding Prenatal Care among Pregnant Brazilian Women, 2017 to 2018: A Mixed-Methods Study. Matern Child Health J 2020; 24:1438-1445. [PMID: 33009981 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-03012-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence of alcohol and tobacco drug use among pregnant women and investigate their perceptions regarding advice from health professionals during prenatal care. METHOD We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design for this cross-sectional study; the study period was January 2017 to December 2018. Multistage random sampling resulted in the selection of 255 pregnant women assisted in primary care units and through the Family Health Strategy in a city in southern Brazil. Trained interviewers collected data on the use of alcohol and tobacco drugs and socioeconomic characteristics via a questionnaire. Qualitative interviews were performed with pregnant women identified as alcohol and tobacco drug users in the quantitative phase. Interviews proceeded consecutively until saturation was reached, followed by a thematic analysis of interview content based on Braun and Clarke. RESULTS The prevalence of smoking and alcohol use was 12.55% and 14.12%, respectively. From the 14 interviews conducted, five categories emerged from the discourses: prenatal care from the perspective of pregnant women, habits and knowledge regarding smoking during pregnancy, habits and knowledge regarding alcohol use during pregnancy, previous experiences and empirical knowledge, and pregnant women's preferences for talking about their habits. CONCLUSION FOR PRACTICE Study findings identified smoking and alcohol use as habits among some women during pregnancy and, consequently, the need for improving care because of their superficial knowledge regarding tobacco and alcohol use. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening measures and establishing new strategies that ensure women's understanding, empowerment, and choices-from the beginning of childbearing age-regarding habits during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Acin MT, Rueda JR, Saiz LC, Parent Mathias V, Alzueta N, Solà I, Garjón J, Erviti J. Alcohol intake reduction for controlling hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9:CD010022. [PMID: 32960976 PMCID: PMC8094445 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010022.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High blood pressure constitutes one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity all over the world. At the same time, heavy drinking increases the risk for developing cardiovascular diseases, including cardiomyopathy, hypertension, atrial arrhythmias, or stroke. Several studies have already assessed specifically the relationship between alcohol intake and hypertension. However, the potential effect on blood pressure of alcohol intake reduction interventions is largely unknown. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of any intervention to reduce alcohol intake in terms of blood pressure decrease in hypertensive people with alcohol consumption compared to a control intervention or no intervention at all. To determine additional effects related to mortality, major cardiovascular events, serious adverse events, or quality of life. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to June 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 5, 2020), MEDLINE Ovid (from 1946), MEDLINE Ovid Epub Ahead of Print, and MEDLINE Ovid In-Process, Embase Ovid (from 1974), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Trial authors were contacted when needed and no language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials with minimum 12 weeks duration and including 50 or more subjects per group with quantitative measurement of alcohol consumption and/or biological measurement of the outcomes of interest. Participants were adults (16 years of age or older) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 90 mmHg, and SBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 80 mmHg in participants with diabetes. We included any intervention implemented to reduce their alcohol intake. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed search results and extracted data using standard methodological procedures adopted by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS A total of 1210 studies were screened. We included one randomised controlled trial involving a total of 269 participants with a two-year follow-up. Individual patient data for all participants were provided and used in this review. No differences were found between the cognitive-behavioural intervention group and the control group for overall mortality (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.16 to 3.17; low-certainty evidence), cardiovascular mortality (not estimable) and cardiovascular events (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.79; very low-certainty evidence). There was no statistical difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction (Mean Difference (MD) -0.92 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.66 to 3.82 mmHg; very low-certainty evidence) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) decrease (MD 0.98 mmHg, 95% CI -1.69 to 3.65 mmHg; low-certainty evidence) between the cognitive-behavioural intervention group and the control group. We also did not find any differences in the proportion of subjects with SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg (Risk Ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.65; very low-certainty evidence). Concerning secondary outcomes, the alcohol intake was significantly reduced in the cognitive-behavioural intervention compared with the control group (MD 191.33 g, 95% CI 85.36 to 297.30 g). We found no differences between the active and control intervention in the proportion of subjects with lower-risk alcohol intake versus higher-risk and extreme drinkers at the end of the study (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.60). There were no estimable results for the quality of life outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS An intervention for decreasing alcohol intake consumption did not result in differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with a control intervention, although there was a reduction in alcohol intake favouring the active intervention. No differences were found either for overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality or cardiovascular events. No data on serious adverse events or quality of life were available to assess. Adequate randomised controlled trials are needed to provide additional evidence on this specific question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - José-Ramón Rueda
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
| | - Luis Carlos Saiz
- Unit of Innovation and Organization, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Natalia Alzueta
- Drug Prescribing Service, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ivan Solà
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Garjón
- Medicines Advice and Information Service, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Erviti
- Unit of Innovation and Organization, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Poikolainen K. Paternalism and alcohol policy. DRUGS AND ALCOHOL TODAY 2020. [DOI: 10.1108/dat-07-2020-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate to what degree scientific evidence supports contemporary paternalistic alcohol policy practices targeting fully competent adults.
Design/methodology/approach
Paternalism may be acceptable if it is effective, fair and protects the safety of the citizen or a third party from the harms caused by the citizen’s autonomic actions. To be justifiable, paternalistic actions should bring about clearly more benefits than harms. Otherwise, autonomy should prevail. The evidence related to alcohol control policies is assessed against these principles.
Findings
In peaceful civilized societies, alcohol control policies (high prices, restrictions on supply and marketing) have no or only insignificant effectiveness. Some policies are unfair and may bring about more harms than benefits. There is strong evidence showing that brief interventions aiming to reduce alcohol intake are inefficient. Wide-scale screening for such interventions is likely to waste health service resources. There is sufficient evidence to refute the claim that the previously mentioned policies are effective measures to reduce alcohol-related harms. Heavy alcohol use during pregnancy and driving motor vehicles while intoxicated may bring about harm to others than the user. Behavioural interventions to reduce heavy use in pregnancy have been shown to be inefficient. Light alcohol use may have no harmful effect on the developing embryo, whereas heavy use is likely to cause harm. There is moderate evidence for enforcing legal blood alcohol concentration limits to reduce traffic accidents and fatalities.
Originality/value
This is the first review on the acceptability of paternalism in currently recommended alcohol policies. It shows that in only a few cases, paternalism is effective and compatible with freedom and fairness.
Collapse
|
15
|
Palmer MJ, Henschke N, Bergman H, Villanueva G, Maayan N, Tamrat T, Mehl GL, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fønhus MS, Free C. Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving maternal, neonatal, and child health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8:CD013679. [PMID: 32813276 PMCID: PMC8477611 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of poor maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) accounts for more than a quarter of healthy years of life lost worldwide. Targeted client communication (TCC) via mobile devices (MD) (TCCMD) may be a useful strategy to improve MNCH. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of TCC via MD on health behaviour, service use, health, and well-being for MNCH. SEARCH METHODS In July/August 2017, we searched five databases including The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase. We also searched two trial registries. A search update was carried out in July 2019 and potentially relevant studies are awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials that assessed TCC via MD to improve MNCH behaviour, service use, health, and well-being. Eligible comparators were usual care/no intervention, non-digital TCC, and digital non-targeted client communication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane, although data extraction and risk of bias assessments were carried out by one person only and cross-checked by a second. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 trials (17,463 participants). Trial populations were: pregnant and postpartum women (11 trials conducted in low-, middle- or high-income countries (LMHIC); pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV (three trials carried out in one lower middle-income country); and parents of children under the age of five years (13 trials conducted in LMHIC). Most interventions (18) were delivered via text messages alone, one was delivered through voice calls only, and the rest were delivered through combinations of different communication channels, such as multimedia messages and voice calls. Pregnant and postpartum women TCCMD versus standard care For behaviours, TCCMD may increase exclusive breastfeeding in settings where rates of exclusive breastfeeding are less common (risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.06 to 1.59; low-certainty evidence), but have little or no effect in settings where almost all women breastfeed (low-certainty evidence). For use of health services, TCCMD may increase antenatal appointment attendance (odds ratio (OR) 1.54, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.96; low-certainty evidence); however, the CI encompasses both benefit and harm. The intervention may increase skilled attendants at birth in settings where a lack of skilled attendants at birth is common (though this differed by urban/rural residence), but may make no difference in settings where almost all women already have a skilled attendant at birth (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.94; low-certainty evidence). There were uncertain effects on maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity because the certainty of the evidence was assessed as very low. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC (e.g. pamphlets) TCCMD may have little or no effect on exclusive breastfeeding (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.07; low-certainty evidence). TCCMD may reduce 'any maternal health problem' (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.79) and 'any newborn health problem' (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.06) reported up to 10 days postpartum (low-certainty evidence), though the CI for the latter includes benefit and harm. The effect on health service use is unknown due to a lack of studies. TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication No studies reported behavioural, health, or well-being outcomes for this comparison. For use of health services, there are uncertain effects for the presence of a skilled attendant at birth due to very low-certainty evidence, and the intervention may make little or no difference to attendance for antenatal influenza vaccination (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.58), though the CI encompasses both benefit and harm (low-certainty evidence). Pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV TCCMD versus standard care For behaviours, TCCMD may make little or no difference to maternal and infant adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (low-certainty evidence). For health service use, TCC mobile telephone reminders may increase use of antenatal care slightly (mean difference (MD) 1.5, 95% CI -0.36 to 3.36; low-certainty evidence). The effect on the proportion of births occurring in a health facility is uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence. For health and well-being outcomes, there was an uncertain intervention effect on neonatal death or stillbirth, and infant HIV due to very low-certainty evidence. No studies reported on maternal mortality or morbidity. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC The effect is unknown due to lack of studies reporting this comparison. TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication TCCMD may increase infant ARV/prevention of mother-to-child transmission treatment adherence (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.48; low-certainty evidence). The effect on other outcomes is unknown due to lack of studies. Parents of children aged less than five years No studies reported on correct treatment, nutritional, or health outcomes. TCCMD versus standard care Based on 10 trials, TCCMD may modestly increase health service use (vaccinations and HIV care) (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence); however, the effect estimates varied widely between studies. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC TCCMD may increase attendance for vaccinations (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.28; low-certainty evidence), and may make little or no difference to oral hygiene practices (low-certainty evidence). TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication TCCMD may reduce attendance for vaccinations, but the CI encompasses both benefit and harm (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.20; low-certainty evidence). No trials in any population reported data on unintended consequences. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effect of TCCMD for most outcomes is uncertain. There may be improvements for some outcomes using targeted communication but these findings were of low certainty. High-quality, adequately powered trials and cost-effectiveness analyses are required to reliably ascertain the effects and relative benefits of TCCMD. Future studies should measure potential unintended consequences, such as partner violence or breaches of confidentiality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Palmer
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Tigest Tamrat
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Garrett L Mehl
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Caroline Free
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Heslehurst N, Hayes L, Jones D, Newham J, Olajide J, McLeman L, McParlin C, de Brun C, Azevedo L. The effectiveness of smoking cessation, alcohol reduction, diet and physical activity interventions in changing behaviours during pregnancy: A systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232774. [PMID: 32469872 PMCID: PMC7259673 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy is a teachable moment for behaviour change. Multiple guidelines target pregnant women for behavioural intervention. This systematic review of systematic reviews reports the effectiveness of interventions delivered during pregnancy on changing women's behaviour across multiple behavioural domains. METHODS Fourteen databases were searched for systematic reviews published from 2008, reporting interventions delivered during pregnancy targeting smoking, alcohol, diet or physical activity as outcomes. Data on behaviour change related to these behaviours are reported here. Quality was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tool for umbrella reviews. Consistency in intervention effectiveness and gaps in the evidence-base are described. RESULTS Searches identified 24,388 results; 109 were systematic reviews of behaviour change interventions delivered in pregnancy, and 36 reported behavioural outcomes. All smoking and alcohol reviews identified reported maternal behaviours as outcomes (n = 16 and 4 respectively), whereas only 16 out of 89 diet and/or physical activity reviews reported these behaviours. Most reviews were high quality (67%) and interventions were predominantly set in high-income countries. Overall, there was consistent evidence for improving healthy diet behaviours related to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption and decreasing carbohydrate intake, and fairly consistent evidence for increase in some measures of physical activity (METs and VO2 max) and for reductions in fat intake and smoking during pregnancy. There was a lack of consistent evidence across reviews reporting energy, protein, fibre, or micronutrient intakes; smoking cessation, abstinence or relapse; any alcohol behaviours. CONCLUSIONS The most consistent review evidence is for interventions improving dietary behaviours during pregnancy compared with other behaviours, although the majority of diet reviews prioritised reporting health-related outcomes over behavioural outcomes. Heterogeneity between reported behaviour outcomes limits ability to pool data in meta-analysis and more consistent reporting is needed. Limited data are available for alcohol interventions in pregnancy or interventions in low- or middle-income-countries, which are priority areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Heslehurst
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Hayes
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Jones
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - James Newham
- School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joan Olajide
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Durham, United Kingdom
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Louise McLeman
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine McParlin
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Durham, United Kingdom
- Department of Nursing Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline de Brun
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Liane Azevedo
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Durham, United Kingdom
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Doherty E, Kingsland M, Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Dray J, Hollis J, Elliott EJ, Daly JB, Bailey KA, Attia J, Hunter M, Symonds I, Tully B, Tremain D, Hodder RK. Implementation strategies to improve preconception and antenatal care for tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and weight management: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2019; 8:285. [PMID: 31759397 PMCID: PMC6874816 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1193-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite existing best practice care recommendations for addressing tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and weight management in preconception and antenatal care, such recommendations are often not implemented into routine practice. Effective strategies that target known barriers to implementation are key to reducing this evidence to practice gap. The aim of this review is to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving the provision of preconception and antenatal care for these modifiable risk factors. METHODS Randomised and non-randomised study designs will be eligible for inclusion if they have a parallel control group. We will include studies that either compare an implementation strategy to usual practice or compare two or more strategies. Participants may include any health service providing preconception or antenatal care to women and/or the health professionals working within such a service. The primary outcome will be any measure of the effectiveness of implementation strategies to improve preconception and/or antenatal care for tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and/or weight management (including care to improve nutrition and/or physical activity). Secondary outcomes will include the effect of the implementation strategy on women's modifiable risk factors, estimates of absolute costs or cost-effectiveness and any reported unintentional consequences. Eligible studies will be identified via searching Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and other sources (e.g. contacting experts in the field). Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias will be assessed independently by two review authors and differences resolved by a third reviewer. If data permits, we will conduct fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis where appropriate. If studies do not report the same outcome or there is significant heterogeneity, results will be summarised narratively. DISCUSSION This review will identify which implementation strategies are effective in improving the routine provision of preconception and antenatal care for tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and weight management. Such a review will be of interest to service providers, policy makers and implementation researchers seeking to improve women's modifiable risk factors in preconception and antenatal care settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019131691.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doherty
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Julia Dray
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Jenna Hollis
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Elizabeth J. Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Kids’ Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales Australia
| | - Justine B. Daly
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Kylie A. Bailey
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Primary Care, Newcastle, New South Wales Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Mandy Hunter
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Ian Symonds
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Danika Tremain
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| | - Rebecca K. Hodder
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales 2287 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Prenatal Alcohol Use and Cigarette Smoking: A Survey of Academic and Community Health Care Providers. J Addict Med 2019; 14:e76-e82. [PMID: 31703018 PMCID: PMC7413672 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal alcohol and cigarette smoking are associated with numerous adverse pregnancy outcomes. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) represents a standardized approach; however, implementation in routine pregnancy care remains a challenge. The purpose of the study was to determine current practices, barriers to implementation, and education needs of healthcare providers utilizing SBIRT to address prenatal alcohol and cigarette smoking.
Collapse
|
19
|
Schölin L, Fitzgerald N. The conversation matters: a qualitative study exploring the implementation of alcohol screening and brief interventions in antenatal care in Scotland. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:316. [PMID: 31481011 PMCID: PMC6724251 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2431-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) in antenatal care is internationally recommended to prevent harm caused by alcohol exposure during pregnancy. There is, however, limited understanding of how SBI is implemented within antenatal care; particularly the approach taken by midwives. This study aimed to explore the implementation of a national antenatal SBI programme in Scotland. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with antenatal SBI implementation leaders (N = 8) in eight Scottish health boards. Interviews were analysed thematically and using the ‘practical, robust implementation and sustainability model’ (PRISM) to understand differences in implementation across health boards and perceived setting-specific barriers and challenges. Results In several health boards, where reported maternal alcohol use was lower than expected, implementation leaders sought to optimize enquires about women’s alcohol use to facilitate honest disclosure. Strategies focused on having positive conversations, exploring pre-pregnancy drinking habits, and building a trusting relationship between pregnant women and midwives. Women’s responses were encouraging and disclosure rates appeared improved, though with some unexpected variation over time. Adapting the intervention to the local context was also considered important. Conclusions This is the first study to explore implementation leaders’ experiences of antenatal SBI delivery and identify possible changes in disclosure rates arising from the approach taken. In contrast with current antenatal alcohol screening recommendations, a conversational approach was advocated to enhance the accuracy and honesty of reporting. This may enable provision of support to more women to prevent Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) and will therefore be of international interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Schölin
- School of Health in Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Niamh Fitzgerald
- Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Doherty E, Wiggers J, Wolfenden L, Anderson AE, Crooks K, Tsang TW, Elliott EJ, Dunlop AJ, Attia J, Dray J, Tully B, Bennett N, Murray H, Azzopardi C, Kingsland M. Antenatal care for alcohol consumption during pregnancy: pregnant women's reported receipt of care and associated characteristics. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:299. [PMID: 31419964 PMCID: PMC6698023 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2436-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antenatal clinical guidelines recommend that during initial and subsequent antenatal visits all pregnant women: have their alcohol consumption assessed; be advised that it is safest not to consume alcohol during pregnancy and of the potential risks of consumption; and be offered referrals for further support if required. However, the extent to which pregnant women attending public antenatal services receive guideline recommended care at these visits, and the characteristics associated with its receipt, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine: 1) pregnant women’s reported receipt of guideline recommended care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy; 2) characteristics associated with the receipt of care; and 3) pregnant women’s acceptability of care. Methods From July 2017 – February 2018 a survey (telephone or online) was undertaken with 1363 pregnant women who had recently visited a public antenatal service in one health district in Australia. Receipt and acceptability of recommended care were assessed via descriptive statistics and associations via logistic regression analyses. Results At the initial antenatal visit, less than two thirds (64.3%) of pregnant women reported that they received an assessment of their alcohol consumption and just over one third (34.9%) received advice and referral appropriate to their self-reported level of alcohol consumption since pregnancy recognition. Less than 10% of women received such care at subsequent antenatal visits. Characteristics that significantly increased the odds of receiving all guideline elements at the initial antenatal visit included: less than university attainment (OR = 1.93; 95% CI:1.12, 3.34), not residing in an advantaged area (OR = 2.11; 95% CI:1.17, 3.79), first pregnancy (OR = 1.91; 95% CI:1.22, 2.99) and regional/rural service location (OR = 2.38; 95% CI:1.26, 4.48); and at subsequent visits: younger age (OR = 0.91; 95% CI:0.84, 0.99) and Aboriginal origin (OR = 3.17; 95% CI:1.22, 8.24). Each of the recommended care elements were highly acceptable to pregnant women (88.3–99.4%). Conclusions Although care for alcohol consumption is both recommended by clinical guidelines and highly acceptable to pregnant women, its receipt in public antenatal services is suboptimal. There is a need and an opportunity for interventions to support antenatal care providers to routinely and consistently provide such care to all pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doherty
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia. .,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - John Wiggers
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy E Anderson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristy Crooks
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Tracey W Tsang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian J Dunlop
- Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julia Dray
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
| | - Nicole Bennett
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Murray
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carol Azzopardi
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fergie L, Campbell KA, Coleman-Haynes T, Ussher M, Cooper S, Coleman T. Identifying Effective Behavior Change Techniques for Alcohol and Illicit Substance Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Ann Behav Med 2019; 53:769-781. [PMID: 30379989 PMCID: PMC6636888 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During pregnancy, consuming alcohol and using illicit drugs can have serious health implications for both mother and child. Behavioral change interventions, especially those underpinned by theoretical constructs, can be effective in reducing harmful substance use among pregnant women. PURPOSE To understand what type of behavior change mechanisms could be useful in reducing alcohol consumption or achieving abstinence from illicit drug use during pregnancy, this review aimed to identify behavior change techniques (BCTs), the smallest, active components of interventions that may be effective. It also aimed to establish the extent that psychosocial-based theories were used to inform intervention design. METHODS To identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five databases were searched electronically from the end search dates of the most recent Cochrane systematic reviews on behavioral interventions for each behavior, until March 2018. Within the RCTs, intervention descriptions were analyzed for BCT content and extent of theory use in the intervention design process and outcome measurements, in each trial, was established. "Effectiveness percentages," the number of times a BCT had been a component of an effective intervention divided by the total number of interventions it had been used in, were calculated for BCTs used in two or more trials. RESULTS Including all RCTs from the Cochrane reviews, and those published subsequently, nine alcohol and six illicit drug trials were identified. Interventions tested in four alcohol RCTs and no illicit drugs RCTs showed positive results. Subsequent data were extracted for alcohol consumption trials only. Thirteen BCTs showed "potential effectiveness" for alcohol consumption. Six of nine included alcohol trials reported using theory but not extensively. CONCLUSIONS Action planning, behavioral contract, prompts/cues, self-talk, offer/direct toward written material, problem solving, feedback on behavior, social support (unspecified), information about health consequences, behavior substitution, assess current readiness and ability to reduce excess alcohol consumption, goal setting (behavior), and tailor interactions appropriately are BCTs that could be useful in helping reduce alcohol consumption among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Libby Fergie
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Katarzyna A Campbell
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tom Coleman-Haynes
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Sue Cooper
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tim Coleman
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Raitasalo K, Holmila M, Jääskeläinen M, Santalahti P. The effect of the severity of parental alcohol abuse on mental and behavioural disorders in children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 28:913-922. [PMID: 30430262 PMCID: PMC6647416 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-018-1253-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Many studies have shown that children of alcohol abusing parents have a higher risk for mental and behavioural disorders compared to other children. Using a retrospective population-based cohort study, based on health care and social welfare registers that include children born in Finland in 1997 and their biological parents, we evaluated whether the severity of parental alcohol abuse is related to these disorders in children. We examined (1) differences in the incidence of mental and behavioural disorders over time among the children of parents with no alcohol problems, parents with less severe alcohol problems and parents with severe alcohol problems, and (2) associations between mother's and father's alcohol abuse and children's risk of disorders. Children were followed up until the age of 15. A diagnosis of mental or behavioural disorders during the follow-up was received by 15.4% of the boys and 9.0% of the girls. Both less severe alcohol abuse (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.61) and severe alcohol abuse (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.11-1.49) in mothers increased the risk of these disorders in their offspring. The corresponding figures among fathers were HR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.92-1.54 and HR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32. Our results indicate that both maternal alcohol abuse and paternal alcohol abuse, regardless of severity, are associated with an increased risk of mental and behavioural disorders in children. It is crucial for professionals working with children to pay attention to all children whose parents have any alcohol abuse problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsimarja Raitasalo
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
- Social Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
| | - Marja Holmila
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Päivi Santalahti
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Adebiyi BO, Mukumbang FC, Erasmus C. The Distribution of Available Prevention and Management Interventions for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (2007 to 2017): Implications for Collaborative Actions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16122244. [PMID: 31242673 PMCID: PMC6617245 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The global prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) remains high despite the various preventive and management interventions that have been designed and implemented to tackle the issue in various settings. The aim of the scoping review is to identify and classify prevention and management interventions of FASD reported globally across the life span and to map the concentration of these interventions across the globe. We searched some selected databases with predefined terms. Framework and narrative approaches were used to synthesize and report on the findings. Thirty-two prevention intervention studies and 41 management interventions studies were identified. All the interventions were reported to be effective or showed promising outcomes for the prevention and management of FASD, except four. Although Europe and Africa have a relatively higher prevalence of FASD, the lowest number of interventions to address FASD were identified in these regions. Most of the interventions for FASD were reported in North America with comparatively lower FASD prevalence. The uneven distribution of interventions designed for FASD vis-à-vis the burden of FASD in the different regions calls for a concerted effort for knowledge and intervention sharing to enhance the design of contextually sensitive preventive and management policy in the different regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babatope O Adebiyi
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 8001, South Africa.
| | - Ferdinand C Mukumbang
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 8001, South Africa.
| | - Charlene Erasmus
- Child and Family Studies, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 8001, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Washio Y, Humphreys M. Maternal Behavioral Health: Fertile Ground for Behavior Analysis. Perspect Behav Sci 2018; 41:637-652. [PMID: 31976417 PMCID: PMC6701727 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-018-0143-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization has identified four behavioral health priorities as risk factors for noncommunicable diseases in maternal populations: tobacco use, harmful alcohol use, poor nutrition, and lack of physical activity. These risk factors also significantly affect pregnant and immediately postpartum mothers, doubling the health risk and economic burden by adversely affecting maternal and birth or infant outcomes. Psychosocial and behavioral interventions are ideal for pregnant and immediately postpartum women as opposed to pharmacotherapy. Among other behavioral interventions, the use of incentives based on the principles of reinforcement has been a successful yet controversial way to change health behaviors. Implementing an incentive-based intervention in maternal health often brings up social validity concerns. The existing guideline on how to develop and conduct research in incentive-based interventions for maternal health lacks enough information on the specific variables to control for to maintain the intervention's effectiveness. This article outlines some of the critical variables in implementing an effective behavior-analytic intervention and addressing social validity concerns to change maternal behaviors in a sustainable manner, along with specific research topics needed in the field to prevent adverse maternal, birth, and infant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukiko Washio
- Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE USA
- University of Delaware, 4755 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Newark, DE 19713 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kingsland M, Doherty E, Anderson AE, Crooks K, Tully B, Tremain D, Tsang TW, Attia J, Wolfenden L, Dunlop AJ, Bennett N, Hunter M, Ward S, Reeves P, Symonds I, Rissel C, Azzopardi C, Searles A, Gillham K, Elliott EJ, Wiggers J. A practice change intervention to improve antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption by women during pregnancy: research protocol for a randomised stepped-wedge cluster trial. Implement Sci 2018; 13:112. [PMID: 30126437 PMCID: PMC6102816 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0806-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite clinical guideline recommendations, implementation of antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption by pregnant women is limited. Implementation strategies addressing barriers to such care may be effective in increasing care provision. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness of a multi-strategy practice change intervention in increasing antenatal care addressing the consumption of alcohol by pregnant women. Methods The study will be a randomised, stepped-wedge controlled trial conducted in three sectors in a health district in New South Wales, Australia. Stepped implementation of a practice change intervention will be delivered to sectors in a random order to support the introduction of a model of care for addressing alcohol consumption by pregnant women. A staged process was undertaken to develop the implementation strategies, which comprise of: leadership support, local clinical practice guidelines, electronic prompts and reminders, opinion leaders, academic detailing (audit and feedback), educational meetings and educational materials, and performance monitoring. Repeated cross-sectional outcome data will be gathered weekly across all sectors for the study duration. The primary outcome measures are the proportion of antenatal appointments at ‘booking in’, 27–28 weeks gestation and 35–36 weeks gestation for which women report (1) being assessed for alcohol consumption, (2) being provided with brief advice related to alcohol consumption during pregnancy, (3) receiving relevant care for addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and (4) being assessed for alcohol consumption and receiving relevant care. Data on resources expended during intervention development and implementation will be collected. The proportion of women who report consuming alcohol since knowing they were pregnant will be measured as a secondary outcome. Discussion This will be the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving antenatal care that addresses alcohol consumption by pregnant women. If positive changes in clinical practice are found, this evidence will support health service adoption of implementation strategies to support improved antenatal care for this recognised risk to the health and wellbeing of the mother and child. Trial registrations Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, No. ACTRN12617000882325 (date registered: 16/06/2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Kingsland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia. .,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Emma Doherty
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy E Anderson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristy Crooks
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Danika Tremain
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tracey W Tsang
- School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian J Dunlop
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.,Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Bennett
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mandy Hunter
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Ward
- Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education, Deakin, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Symonds
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Chris Rissel
- School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,New South Wales Office of Preventive Health, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carol Azzopardi
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Searles
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Gillham
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Elliott
- School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Louw KA. Substance use in pregnancy: The medical challenge. Obstet Med 2018; 11:54-66. [PMID: 29997687 PMCID: PMC6038015 DOI: 10.1177/1753495x17750299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Substance use contributes significantly to the global burden of disease. Growing numbers of women use nicotine, alcohol, and illicit substances. Women are the most vulnerable to problematic substance use in their reproductive years. The first 1000 days of life, starting at conception, have been established as a critical window of time for long-term health and development. Substance use in pregnancy is associated with negative pregnancy and child health outcomes. The impact of antenatal substance use on these outcomes needs to be considered within a challenging and complex context. This review provides an overview of the current literature on the impact of substances on pregnancy and child outcomes as well as the evidence and guidelines on screening and interventions for women using substances during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry-Ann Louw
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Emery RL. A Perspective on the Potential Associations among Impulsivity, Palatable Food Intake, and Weight Gain in Pregnancy: Arguing a Need for Future Research. CURRENT ADDICTION REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40429-018-0201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
28
|
Bevelander KE, Herte K, Kakoulakis C, Sanguino I, Tebbe AL, Tünte MR. Eating for Two? Protocol of an Exploratory Survey and Experimental Study on Social Norms and Norm-Based Messages Influencing European Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women's Eating Behavior. Front Psychol 2018; 9:658. [PMID: 29867640 PMCID: PMC5952269 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The social context is an important factor underlying unhealthy eating behavior and the development of inappropriate weight gain. Evidence is accumulating that powerful social influences can also be used as a tool to impact people's eating behavior in a positive manner. Social norm-based messages have potential to steer people in making healthier food choices. The research field on nutritional social norms is still emerging and more research is needed to gain insights into why some people adhere to social norms whereas others do not. There are indications stemming from empirical studies on social eating behavior that this may be due to ingratiation purposes and uncertainty reduction. That is, people match their eating behavior to that of the norm set by their eating companion(s) in order to blend in and be part of the group. In this project, we explore nutritional social norms among pregnant women. This population is particularly interesting because they are often subject to unsolicited advice and experience social pressure from their environment. In addition, their pregnancy affects their body composition, eating pattern, and psychosocial status. Pregnancy provides an important window of opportunity to impact health of pregnant women and their child. Nevertheless, the field of nutritional social norms among pregnant women is understudied and more knowledge is needed on whether pregnant women use guidelines from their social environment for their own eating behavior. In this project we aim to fill this research gap by means of an exploratory survey (Study 1) assessing information about social expectations, (mis)perceived social norms and the role of different reference groups such as other pregnant women, family, and friends. In addition, we conduct an online experiment (Study 2) testing to what extent pregnant women are susceptible to social norm-based messages compared to non-pregnant women. Moreover, possible moderators are explored which might impact women's susceptibility to social norms as well as cultural aspects that co-determine which social norms and guidelines exist. The project's findings could help design effective intervention messages in promoting healthy eating behavior specifically targeted to European pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten E. Bevelander
- Communication Science, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Katharina Herte
- Department of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Inés Sanguino
- Department of Psychology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna-Lena Tebbe
- Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Markus R. Tünte
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Petrelli B, Weinberg J, Hicks GG. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE): insights into FASD using mouse models of PAE. Biochem Cell Biol 2018; 96:131-147. [PMID: 29370535 PMCID: PMC5991836 DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2017-0280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The potential impact of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) varies considerably among exposed individuals, with some displaying serious alcohol-related effects and many others showing few or no overt signs of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). In animal models, variables such as nutrition, genetic background, health, other drugs, and stress, as well as dosage, duration, and gestational timing of exposure to alcohol can all be controlled in a way that is not possible in a clinical situation. In this review we examine mouse models of PAE and focus on those with demonstrated craniofacial malformations, abnormal brain development, or behavioral phenotypes that may be considered FASD-like outcomes. Analysis of these data should provide a valuable tool for researchers wishing to choose the PAE model best suited to their research questions or to investigate established PAE models for FASD comorbidities. It should also allow recognition of patterns linking gestational timing, dosage, and duration of PAE, such as recognizing that binge alcohol exposure(s) during early gestation can lead to severe FASD outcomes. Identified patterns could be particularly insightful and lead to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying FASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berardino Petrelli
- Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics; Regenerative Medicine Program, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada
| | - Joanne Weinberg
- Department of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, UBC Institute of Mental Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Geoffrey G. Hicks
- Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics; Regenerative Medicine Program, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kang-Yi CD, Kornfield SL, Epperson CN, Mandell DS. Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Psychiatric Disorders: A Population-Based Study With a Matched Control Group. Psychiatr Serv 2018; 69:300-307. [PMID: 29137553 PMCID: PMC5937933 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to identify whether pregnancy complications differ between women with and without a psychiatric disorder diagnosis prior to pregnancy. METHODS Women who gave birth between 2007 and 2009 in Pennsylvania and were enrolled in Medicaid from one year prior to their pregnancy until their delivery were included (N=9,930); those with psychiatric disorders were compared with a matched control group (N=4,965 for each). Logistic regression analysis estimated the odds of having a pregnancy complication among those with a psychiatric diagnosis prior to pregnancy, adjusting for demographic characteristics and chronic general medical conditions. RESULTS Compared with the control group, women with a psychiatric disorder prior to pregnancy had greater odds of having at least one pregnancy complication (odds ratio=1.48, 95% confidence interval=1.37-1.61). Compared with the control group, their odds of antepartum hemorrhage were 1.50 times higher, their odds of preterm labor were 1.45 times higher, and their odds of preterm birth were 1.61 times higher. CONCLUSIONS Women with psychiatric disorders prior to pregnancy were more likely to experience pregnancy complications, including pregnancy hemorrhage, preterm labor, and preterm birth, after the analysis controlled for age, race-ethnicity, and chronic illness status before and during pregnancy. The finding of an association between psychiatric disorders and a higher complication risk suggests the importance of population-based preconception interventions for women with psychiatric disorders and prenatal monitoring to reduce the risk of pregnancy complications in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina D Kang-Yi
- The authors are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Sara L Kornfield
- The authors are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - C Neill Epperson
- The authors are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - David S Mandell
- The authors are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Carson G, Cox LV, Crane J, Croteau P, Graves L, Kluka S, Koren G, Martel MJ, Midmer D, Nulman I, Poole N, Senikas V, Wood R. Archivée: No 245-Directive clinique de consensus sur la consommation d’alcool et la grossesse. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 39:e255-e292. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
32
|
Carson G, Cox LV, Crane J, Croteau P, Graves L, Kluka S, Koren G, Martel MJ, Midmer D, Nulman I, Poole N, Senikas V, Wood R. No. 245-Alcohol Use and Pregnancy Consensus Clinical Guidelines. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 39:e220-e254. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
33
|
Goodfellow A, Frank J, McAteer J, Rankin J. Improving preconception health and care: a situation analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:595. [PMID: 28835244 PMCID: PMC5569468 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2544-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this situation analysis was to explore the views of health and non-health professionals working with women of childbearing age on current and future delivery of preconception care in one National Health Service (NHS) Board area in Scotland. Methods The situation analysis was undertaken using a mixed methods approach. Six focus groups were conducted organised by profession – general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, health visitors, family nurses, guidance teachers and youth workers. Existing evidence of effective preconception care interventions informed focus group guides. A survey was undertaken with community pharmacists which provided qualitative data for analysis. Focus group transcripts were analysed by two researchers using a thematic analysis approach. Results There was lack of awareness of preconception health and its importance amongst the target group. Levels of unplanned pregnancy hampered efforts to deliver interventions. Professional knowledge, capacity and consistency of practice were viewed as challenges, as was individual compliance with preconception care advice. Improvement requires multifaceted action, including ensuring the school curriculum adequately prepares adolescents for future parenthood, increasing awareness through communication and marketing, supporting professional knowledge and practice and capitalising on existing opportunities for preconception care, and ensuring services are equitable and targeted to need. Conclusions Delivery of preconception care needs to be improved both before and between pregnancies to improve outcomes for women and infants. Action is required at individual, organisational and community levels to ensure this important issue is at the forefront of preventative care and preventative spending.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Goodfellow
- Department of Public Health, NHS Lanarkshire, Bothwell, G71 8BB, Glasgow, Scotland.
| | - John Frank
- Scottish Collaboration of Public Health Research and Policy, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH48 9DX, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - John McAteer
- Scottish Collaboration of Public Health Research and Policy, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH48 9DX, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Jean Rankin
- Maternal Child and Family Health, School of Health Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) remains the leading cause of postneonatal mortality in the United States, despite reduction in rates of more than 50% since the initiation of the "Back to Sleep" (now called "Safe to Sleep") campaign in 1994. In recent years, the rate of decline in SIDS deaths has plateaued, even with the ongoing educational efforts that promote safe sleep and other risk reduction measures. The 2016 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for reducing the risk of SIDS focus heavily on sleep practices, bedding, and location, but also include factors that often receive less attention (ie, prenatal care, maternal smoking, alcohol and drug use, and childhood vaccinations). This review describes these factors that are less often addressed and identifies interventions that have resulted in positive behavioral changes that not only benefit infants, but also promote the health and well-being of their mothers. [Pediatr Ann. 2017;46(8):e284-e290.].
Collapse
|
35
|
Velasquez MM, von Sternberg KL, Floyd RL, Parrish D, Kowalchuk A, Stephens NS, Ostermeyer B, Green C, Seale JP, Mullen PD. Preventing Alcohol and Tobacco Exposed Pregnancies: CHOICES Plus in Primary Care. Am J Prev Med 2017; 53:85-95. [PMID: 28427955 PMCID: PMC6590512 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alcohol and tobacco use are common among U.S. women, yet if used during pregnancy these substances present significant preventable risks to prenatal and perinatal health. Because use of alcohol and tobacco often continue into the first trimester and beyond, especially among women with unintended pregnancies, effective evidence-based approaches are needed to decrease these risk behaviors. This study was designed to test the efficacy of CHOICES Plus, a preconception intervention for reducing the risk of alcohol- and tobacco-exposed pregnancies (AEPs and TEPs). STUDY DESIGN RCT with two intervention groups: CHOICES Plus (n=131) versus Brief Advice (n=130). Data collected April 2011 to October 2013. Data analysis finalized February 2016. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Settings were 12 primary care clinics in a large Texas public healthcare system. Participants were women who were non-sterile, non-pregnant, aged 18-44 years, drinking more than three drinks per day or more than seven drinks per week, sexually active, and not using effective contraception (N=261). Forty-five percent were smokers. INTERVENTION Interventions were two CHOICES Plus sessions and a contraceptive visit or Brief Advice and referral to community resources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were reduced risk of AEP and TEP through 9-month follow-up. RESULTS In intention-to-treat analyses across 9 months, the CHOICES Plus group was more likely than the Brief Advice group to reduce risk of AEP with an incidence rate ratio of 0.620 (95% CI=0.511, 0.757) and absolute risk reduction of -0.233 (95% CI=-0.239, -0.226). CHOICES Plus group members at risk for both exposures were more likely to reduce TEP risk (incidence rate ratio, 0.597; 95% CI=0.424, 0.840 and absolute risk reduction, -0.233; 95% CI=-0.019, -0.521). CONCLUSIONS CHOICES Plus significantly reduced AEP and TEP risk. Addressing these commonly co-occurring risk factors in a single preconception program proved both feasible and efficacious in a low-income primary care population. Intervening with women before they become pregnant could shift the focus in clinical practice from treatment of substance-exposed pregnancies to prevention of a costly public health concern. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01032772.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Velasquez
- Health Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
| | - Kirk L von Sternberg
- Health Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - R Louise Floyd
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Danielle Parrish
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Alicia Kowalchuk
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Nanette S Stephens
- Health Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Britta Ostermeyer
- College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Charles Green
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - J Paul Seale
- Department of Family Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
| | - Patricia Dolan Mullen
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shepherd-Banigan M, Domino ME, Wells R, Rutledge R, Hillemeier MM, Van Houtven CH. Do Maternity Care Coordination Services Encourage Use of Behavioral Health Treatment among Pregnant Women on Medicaid? Womens Health Issues 2017; 27:449-455. [PMID: 28427755 PMCID: PMC7497466 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maternity care coordination (MCC) may provide an opportunity to enhance access to behavioral health treatment services. However, this relationship has not been examined extensively in the empirical literature. This study examines the effect of MCC on use of behavioral health services among perinatal women. METHODS Medicaid claims data from October 2008 to September 2010 were analyzed using linear fixed effects models to investigate the effects of receipt of MCC services on mental health and substance use-related service use among Medicaid-eligible pregnant and postpartum women in North Carolina (n = 7,406). RESULTS Receipt of MCC is associated with a 20% relative increase in the contemporaneous use of any mental health treatment (within-person change in probability of any mental health visit 0.5% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%], or an increase from 8.3% to 8.8%); MCC in the prior month is associated with a 34% relative increase in the number of mental health visits among women who receive MCC (within-person change in the number of visits received 1.7% [95 CI, 0.2%-3.3%], or from 0.44 to 0.46 mental health visits). No relationship was observed between MCC and Medicaid-funded substance use-related treatment services. CONCLUSIONS MCC may be an effective way to quickly address perinatal mental health needs and engage low-income women in mental health care. However, currently there may be a lost opportunity within MCC to increase access to substance use-related treatment. Future studies should examine how MCC improves access to mental health care such that the program's ability can be strengthened to identify women with substance use-related disorders and transition them into available care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Health Services Research and Development Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Marisa E Domino
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Regina Rutledge
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Marianne M Hillemeier
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Health Services Research and Development Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
McAllister-Williams RH, Baldwin DS, Cantwell R, Easter A, Gilvarry E, Glover V, Green L, Gregoire A, Howard LM, Jones I, Khalifeh H, Lingford-Hughes A, McDonald E, Micali N, Pariante CM, Peters L, Roberts A, Smith NC, Taylor D, Wieck A, Yates LM, Young AH. British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus guidance on the use of psychotropic medication preconception, in pregnancy and postpartum 2017. J Psychopharmacol 2017; 31:519-552. [PMID: 28440103 DOI: 10.1177/0269881117699361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Decisions about the use of psychotropic medication in pregnancy are an ongoing challenge for clinicians and women with mental health problems, owing to the uncertainties around risks of the illness itself to mother and fetus/infant, effectiveness of medications in pregnancy and risks to the fetus/infant from in utero exposure or via breast milk. These consensus guidelines aim to provide pragmatic advice regarding these issues. They are divided into sections on risks of untreated illness in pregnancy; general principles of using drugs in the perinatal period; benefits and harms associated with individual drugs; and recommendations for the management of specific disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hamish McAllister-Williams
- 1 Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.,2 Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David S Baldwin
- 3 Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,4 University Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Abby Easter
- 6 Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- 2 Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,7 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Vivette Glover
- 8 Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lucian Green
- 9 Ealing, Hounslow, Hammersmith & Fulham Perinatal Mental Health Service, West London Mental Health Trust, London, UK
| | - Alain Gregoire
- 3 Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,10 Hampshire Perinatal Mental Health Service, Winchester, UK
| | - Louise M Howard
- 11 Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,12 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ian Jones
- 13 National Centre for Mental Health, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hind Khalifeh
- 11 Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,12 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth McDonald
- 15 Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.,16 East London Foundation Trust, London, UK.,17 Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nadia Micali
- 18 Behavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, GOSH Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carmine M Pariante
- 12 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,19 Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ann Roberts
- 20 St Martin's Healthcare Services CIC, Leeds, UK.,21 Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.,22 Postgraduate School of Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Natalie C Smith
- 23 Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, County Durham, UK
| | - David Taylor
- 12 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,24 Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Angelika Wieck
- 25 Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,26 University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura M Yates
- 27 UK Teratology Information Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,28 Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Allan H Young
- 12 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,19 Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
van der Wulp NY, Hoving C, de Vries H. Correlates of partner support to abstain from prenatal alcohol use: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch partners of pregnant women. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2016; 24:614-622. [PMID: 25944241 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Partners can play an important role, but are often ignored in interventions targeting the prevention of prenatal alcohol use. A better understanding of the correlates of partner support to abstain from prenatal alcohol use can help to make a better use of partner support. The aim of this study was to identify correlates of this support by analysing differences between partners reporting low versus high support. An online cross-sectional study among 237 Dutch partners of pregnant women was conducted. Respondents were recruited through Dutch midwifery practices in September-October 2009. Questionnaires were based on the I-Change Model. Chi-square and t-test showed that partners reporting high support were more likely to desire their partner to abstain from alcohol use and to have received advice from their pregnant spouse or midwife that abstinence was desirable. They also had stronger perceptions that the baby would experience harm from prenatal alcohol use and that harm could be more severe, and they saw more advantages and fewer disadvantages of providing support. They also reported more influence from their social environment encouraging their support, had greater self-efficacy and had a stronger intention to support their partner during the remainder of the pregnancy compared to partners reporting low support. Health professionals may improve their alcohol advice by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of support with the partner and by encouraging couples to discuss and propose solutions for the situations in which partners find it difficult not to support alcohol abstinence. By providing an insight into important correlates of partner support, this study expands the research area aiming to reduce prenatal alcohol use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nickie Y van der Wulp
- Dutch Institute for Alcohol Policy (STAP), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ciska Hoving
- Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hein de Vries
- Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hodgins S, Tielsch J, Rankin K, Robinson A, Kearns A, Caglia J. A New Look at Care in Pregnancy: Simple, Effective Interventions for Neglected Populations. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0160562. [PMID: 27537281 PMCID: PMC4990268 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although this is beginning to change, the content of antenatal care has been relatively neglected in safe-motherhood program efforts. This appears in part to be due to an unwarranted belief that interventions over this period have far less impact than those provided around the time of birth. In this par, we review available evidence for 21 interventions potentially deliverable during pregnancy at high coverage to neglected populations in low income countries, with regard to effectiveness in reducing risk of: maternal mortality, newborn mortality, stillbirth, prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction. Selection was restricted to interventions that can be provided by non-professional health auxiliaries and not requiring laboratory support. METHODS In this narrative review, we included relevant Cochrane and other systematic reviews and did comprehensive bibliographic searches. Inclusion criteria varied by intervention; where available randomized controlled trial evidence was insufficient, observational study evidence was considered. For each intervention we focused on overall contribution to our outcomes of interest, across varying epidemiologies. RESULTS In the aggregate, achieving high effective coverage for this set of interventions would very substantially reduce risk for our outcomes of interest and reduce outcome inequities. Certain specific interventions, if pushed to high coverage have significant potential impact across many settings. For example, reliable detection of pre-eclampsia followed by timely delivery could prevent up to ¼ of newborn and stillbirth deaths and over 90% of maternal eclampsia/pre-eclampsia deaths. Other interventions have potent effects in specific settings: in areas of high P falciparum burden, systematic use of insecticide-treated nets and/or intermittent presumptive therapy in pregnancy could reduce maternal mortality by up to 10%, newborn mortality by up to 20%, and stillbirths by up to 25-30%. Behavioral interventions targeting practices at birth and in the hours that follow can have substantial impact in settings where many births happen at home: in such circumstances early initiation of breastfeeding can reduce risk of newborn death by up to 20%; good thermal care practices can reduce mortality risk by a similar order of magnitude. CONCLUSIONS Simple interventions delivered during pregnancy have considerable potential impact on important mortality outcomes. More programmatic effort is warranted to ensure high effective coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Hodgins
- Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children/ US, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - James Tielsch
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Kristen Rankin
- Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children/ US, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Amber Robinson
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Annie Kearns
- Human Care Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jacquelyn Caglia
- T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Niemelä S, Niemelä O, Ritvanen A, Gissler M, Bloigu A, Werler M, Surcel HM. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Maternal Alcohol Biomarkers in Sera: A Register-Based Case-Control Study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2016; 40:1507-14. [DOI: 10.1111/acer.13101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Solja Niemelä
- Research Unit of Clinical Neuroscience; Faculty of Medicine; University of Oulu; Oulu Finland
- Department of Psychiatry; Lapland Hospital District; Rovaniemi Finland
| | - Onni Niemelä
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Research Unit; Seinäjoki Central Hospital; Seinäjoki Finland
- University of Tampere; Seinäjoki Finland
| | - Annukka Ritvanen
- Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations; National Institute for Health and Welfare; Helsinki Finland
| | - Mika Gissler
- National Institute for Health and Welfare; Helsinki Finland
- Nordic School of Public Health; Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Aini Bloigu
- Department of Health Protection; National Institute of Health and Welfare; Oulu Finland
| | - Martha Werler
- Department of Epidemiology; Boston University School of Public Health; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Heljä-Marja Surcel
- Department of Health Protection; National Institute of Health and Welfare; Oulu Finland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
O'Keeffe LM, Dahly DL, Murphy M, Greene RA, Harrington JM, Corcoran P, Kearney PM. Positive lifestyle changes around the time of pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010233. [PMID: 27154477 PMCID: PMC4861121 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the prevalence of positive lifestyle behaviours before and during pregnancy in Ireland. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Population-based study in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS A total of 718 women of predominantly Caucasian origin from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), Ireland, were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Positive lifestyle behaviour changes before and during pregnancy in Ireland on alcohol consumption, smoking, folate use and nutrition. RESULTS Of 1212 women surveyed, 718 (59%) responded. 26% were adherent to all three recommendations on alcohol consumption, smoking and folate use before pregnancy. This increased to 39% for the same three behaviours during pregnancy, with greater increases in adherence observed among women with the lowest adherence before pregnancy. Age, education and ethnicity gaps in adherence before pregnancy appeared to narrow during pregnancy. Adherence to all seven food pyramid guidelines was less than 1% overall, and less than 1% of participants met all four micronutrient guidelines on vitamin D, folate, calcium and iron intake around the time of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Low levels of healthy lifestyle behaviours before pregnancy and low levels of positive lifestyle behaviours during pregnancy demonstrate an urgent need for increased clinical and public health efforts to target deleterious health behaviours before, during and after pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M O'Keeffe
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Darren L Dahly
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- HRB Clinical Research Facility Cork, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Marion Murphy
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Richard A Greene
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Janas M Harrington
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Paul Corcoran
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patricia M Kearney
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Herzberg J, Barrier B, Sprague DJ, Vinson DC. Substance Use in Women of Reproductive Age. MISSOURI MEDICINE 2016; 113:182-186. [PMID: 27443042 PMCID: PMC6140056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Using anonymous exit questionnaires in a university OB/GYN clinic, of 165 pregnant women reporting on drinking prior to pregnancy, 26% screened positive for hazardous or harmful drinking. Among 153 non-pregnant women age 50 or younger, 39% screened positive. Of those, 85% had no plans to change their alcohol consumption, as most believed their drinking levels were not risky; 80% had a significant risk of becoming pregnant, but 85% believed pregnancy was unlikely.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sorsdahl K, Petersen Williams P, Everett-Murphy K, Vythilingum B, de Villiers P, Myers B, Stein DJ. Feasibility and Preliminary Responses to a Screening and Brief Intervention Program for Maternal Mental Disorders Within the Context of Primary Care. Community Ment Health J 2015; 51:962-9. [PMID: 25744699 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-015-9853-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
There is little evidence of the feasibility and acceptability of integrating screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment services that address depression and alcohol, tobacco and other drug (ATOD) use into antenatal care in South Africa. Data were extracted from program records on the number of eligible women screened and number meeting criteria for depression and self-reported ATOD use. 70 women completed a questionnaire examining their preliminary responses and five MOU personnel were interviewed to identify potential barriers to implementation. Of the 3407 eligible women, 1468 (43 %) women were screened for depression or ATOD use, of whom 302 (21.4 %) screened at risk for depression, 388 (26.4 %) disclosed smoking tobacco, and 29 (2 %) disclosed alcohol or other drugs (AOD). Seventy participants completed the three month follow-up interview. Depression scores decreased significantly following the intervention (t (69) = 8.51, p < 0.001) as did self-reported tobacco use (t (73) = 3.45, p < 0.001), however self-reported AOD use remained unchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Sorsdahl
- Alan. J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. .,Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Petal Petersen Williams
- Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - Kathy Everett-Murphy
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Bavi Vythilingum
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Bronwyn Myers
- Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.,Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Dan J Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Unit on Anxiety and Stress Disorders, Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rushmer RK, Cheetham M, Cox L, Crosland A, Gray J, Hughes L, Hunter DJ, McCabe K, Seaman P, Tannahill C, Van Der Graaf P. Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation in the commissioning and joint planning of public health interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms: a qualitative case design using a cocreation approach. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundConsiderable resources are spent on research to establish what works to improve the nation’s health. If the findings from this research are used, better health outcomes can follow, but we know that these findings are not always used. In public health, evidence of what works may not ‘fit’ everywhere, making it difficult to know what to do locally. Research suggests that evidence use is a social and dynamic process, not a simple application of research findings. It is unclear whether it is easier to get evidence used via a legal contracting process or within unified organisational arrangements with shared responsibilities.ObjectiveTo work in cocreation with research participants to investigate how research is utilised and knowledge mobilised in the commissioning and planning of public health services to reduce alcohol-related harms.Design, setting and participantsTwo in-depth, largely qualitative, cross-comparison case studies were undertaken to compare real-time research utilisation in commissioning across a purchaser–provider split (England) and in joint planning under unified organisational arrangements (Scotland) to reduce alcohol-related harms. Using an overarching realist approach and working in cocreation, case study partners (stakeholders in the process) picked the topic and helped to interpret the findings. In Scotland, the topic picked was licensing; in England, it was reducing maternal alcohol consumption.MethodsSixty-nine interviews, two focus groups, 14 observations of decision-making meetings, two local feedback workshops (n = 23 andn = 15) and one national workshop (n = 10) were undertaken. A questionnaire (n = 73) using a Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale was issued to test the transferability of the 10 main findings. Given the small numbers, care must be taken in interpreting the findings.FindingsNot all practitioners have the time, skills or interest to work in cocreation, but when there was collaboration, much was learned. Evidence included professional and tacit knowledge, and anecdotes, as well as findings from rigorous research designs. It was difficult to identify evidence in use and decisions were sometimes progressed in informal ways and in places we did not get to see. There are few formal evidence entry points. Evidence (prevalence and trends in public health issues) enters the process and is embedded in strategic documents to set priorities, but local data were collected in both sites to provide actionable messages (sometimes replicating the evidence base).ConclusionsTwo mid-range theories explain the findings. If evidence hassaliency(relates to ‘here and now’ as opposed to ‘there and then’) andimmediacy(short, presented verbally or visually and with emotional appeal) it is more likely to be used in both settings. A second mid-range theory explains how differing tensions pull and compete as feasible and acceptable local solutions are pursued across stakeholders. Answering what works depends on answering for whom and where simultaneously to find workable (if temporary) ‘blends’. Gaining this agreement across stakeholders appeared more difficult across the purchaser–provider split, because opportunities to interact were curtailed; however, more research is needed.FundingThis study was funded by the Health Services and Delivery Research programme of the National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemary K Rushmer
- School of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Mandy Cheetham
- School of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Lynda Cox
- Clinical Directorates, NHS England, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ann Crosland
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Joanne Gray
- Department of Public Health and Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - David J Hunter
- Centre for Public Policy and Health, School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Wolfsan Research Institute, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Karen McCabe
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Pete Seaman
- Glasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Peter Van Der Graaf
- School of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Petersen Williams P, Petersen Z, Sorsdahl K, Mathews C, Everett-Murphy K, Parry CDH. Screening and Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Pregnant Women Attending Midwife Obstetric Units in Cape Town, South Africa: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Health Care Professionals. J Midwifery Womens Health 2015. [PMID: 26220766 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the negative consequences of alcohol and other drug use during pregnancy, few interventions for pregnant women are implemented, and little is known about their feasibility and acceptability in primary health care settings in South Africa. As part of the formative phase of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for substance use among women presenting for antenatal care, the present study explored health care workers' attitudes and perceptions about screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment among this population. METHODS Forty-three health care providers at 2 public sector midwife obstetric units in Cape Town, South Africa, were interviewed using an open-ended, semistructured interview schedule designed to identify factors that hinder or support the implementation of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for substance use in these settings. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using the framework approach. RESULTS Health care providers agreed that there is a substantial need for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for substance use among pregnant women and believe such services potentially could be integrated into routine care. Several women-, staff-, and clinic-level barriers were identified that could hinder the successful implementation in antenatal services. These barriers included the nondisclosure of alcohol and other drug use, the intervention being considered as an add-on service or additional work, negative staff attitudes toward implementation of an intervention, poor staff communication styles such as berating women for their behavior, lack of interest from staff, time constraints, staff shortages, overburdened workloads, and language barriers. DISCUSSION The utility of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for addressing substance use among pregnant women in public health midwife obstetric units was supported, but consideration will need to be given to addressing a variety of barriers that have been identified.
Collapse
|
46
|
Bazzo S, Battistella G, Riscica P, Moino G, Marini F, Bottarel M, Dal Pozzo G, Padovan M. Evaluation of a Multilevel and Integrated Program to Raise Awareness of the Harmful Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure in a Local Community. Alcohol Alcohol 2015; 50:708-15. [PMID: 26018219 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agv051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate a multilevel program to raise awareness of the risks of prenatal exposure to alcohol in the area of Treviso (Italy). The program started in 2008 and consists of an action-research experience involving health professionals of maternal-child services, and in the campaign 'Mamma Beve Bimbo Beve', targeted to the childbearing-aged population. METHODS A comparative study was carried out in 2013. Surveys using semi-structured self-report questionnaires were carried out among professionals and pregnant women in Treviso, and among control groups belonging to another local area of Italy (Verona). The questionnaires investigated awareness and opinions about alcohol and pregnancy, as well as sources and kind of information provided and received. RESULTS Health professionals in Treviso, who had been exposed both to the action-research experience and to the campaign, showed a more rational approach to alcohol than colleagues in the control group, and were more aware and sensitized about the risks of alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Physicians and midwives had a higher probability of having advised pregnant women to abstain from alcohol in Treviso. Pregnant women in Treviso, who had received information through the campaign and from professionals, had a higher probability of having received only correct advice about the issue of alcohol and pregnancy, but did not hold perceptions different to women in Verona. CONCLUSIONS The multilevel program carried out in the Treviso area was effective in increasing awareness and improving attitudes towards the risks of alcohol use during pregnancy among local healthcare professionals, compared with the control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giuseppe Battistella
- Epidemiologic Unit, Local Health Authority of Treviso, Treviso, Veneto Region, Italy
| | - Patrizia Riscica
- Addiction Department, Local Health Authority of Treviso, Treviso, Veneto Region, Italy
| | - Giuliana Moino
- Addiction Department, Local Health Authority of Treviso, Treviso, Veneto Region, Italy
| | - Francesco Marini
- Department of Innovation, Development and Planning, Local Health Authority of Treviso, Treviso, Veneto Region, Italy
| | - Mery Bottarel
- Ginaecology and Obstetrics Unit, Local Health Authority of Treviso, Treviso, Veneto Region, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dal Pozzo
- Ginaecology and Obstetrics Unit, Local Health Authority of Treviso, Treviso, Veneto Region, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Shannon GD, Alberg C, Nacul L, Pashayan N. Preconception healthcare and congenital disorders: systematic review of the effectiveness of preconception care programs in the prevention of congenital disorders. Matern Child Health J 2015; 18:1354-79. [PMID: 24091886 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1370-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Congenital disorders are a leading cause of global burden of disease; the birth prevalence remains constant at 6%. Initiating preconception care before pregnancy may be an effective strategy to reduce congenital disorders and improve the health of reproductive-age women. Our objectives are: (1) To identify components of preconception interventions, (2) to assess the effectiveness of preconception interventions in reducing the burden of congenital disorders, and (3) to prioritize these interventions. Medline and Science Direct search terms included: preconception, pre-pregnancy, childbearing, reproduction, care, intervention, primary care, healthcare, model, program, prevention, trial, efficacy, effectiveness, congenital disorders OR abnormalities. Inclusion criteria were: (1) English, (2) human subjects, (3) women of childbearing age, (4) 1980-current data, (5) all countries, (6) experimental studies, (7) systematic reviews or meta-analysis, (8) program reports/evaluations. Data was collected and abstracted by two independent reviewers. To prioritize preconception interventions likely to have the largest impact at a population level, a ranked scoring system was created incorporating the following: (1) quality of evidence supporting the intervention, (2) effect size of the intervention, and (3) global burden of the specific congenital disease. Preconception interventions include risk screening, education, motivational counseling, disease optimization and specialist referral. The most effective interventions, based on the strength of evidence, size of impact of intervention, and disease burden are: folic acid fortification/supplementation, diabetic control, smoking and alcohol interventions, HIV management, thrombophillia screening, obesity prevention and epilepsy management. Although multiple conditions require preconception attention, only nine interventions have evidence to support their effect on congenital disorders through a randomised control trial, systematic review or meta-analysis. There is a need for more high-level research in evaluating certain preconception interventions. These findings have significant implications on planning and implementation of preconception care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geordan D Shannon
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 2SR, UK,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fitzgerald N, Platt L, Heywood S, McCambridge J. Large-scale implementation of alcohol brief interventions in new settings in Scotland: a qualitative interview study of a national programme. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:289. [PMID: 25886312 PMCID: PMC4391282 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1527-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to explore experiences of implementation of alcohol brief interventions (ABIs) in settings outside of primary healthcare in the Scottish national programme. The focus of the study was on strategies and learning to support ABI implementation in settings outside of primary healthcare in general, rather on issues specific to any single setting. Methods 14 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with senior implementation leaders in antenatal, accident and emergency and wider settings and audio-recorded. Interviews were analysed inductively. Results The process of achieving large-scale, routine implementation of ABI proved challenging for all involved across the settings. Interviewees reported their experiences and identified five main strategies as helpful for strategic implementation efforts in any setting: (1) Having a high-profile target for the number of ABIs delivered in a specific time period with clarity about whose responsibility it was to implement the target; (2) Gaining support from senior staff from the start; (3) Adapting the intervention, using a pragmatic, collaborative approach, to fit with current practice; (4) Establishing practical and robust recording, monitoring and reporting systems for intervention delivery, prior to widespread implementation; and (5) Establishing close working relationships with frontline staff including flexible approaches to training and readily available support. Conclusions This qualitative study suggests that even with significant national support, funding and a specific delivery target, ABI implementation in new settings is not straightforward. Those responsible for planning similar initiatives should critically consider the relevance and value of the five implementation strategies identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Fitzgerald
- Institute for Social Marketing, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, , Scotland, UK. .,Institute for Health and Wellbeing Research, Robert Gordon University, Riverside Campus, Aberdeen, AB10 7GJ, UK.
| | - Lucy Platt
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - Susie Heywood
- Glasgow City Community Health Partnership, North-East Sector, Eastbank Health Promotion & Training Centre, Academy Street, Glasgow, G32 9AA, UK.
| | - Jim McCambridge
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are less prevalent in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women, but these disorders can create a host of clinical challenges when encountered. Unfortunately, little evidence is available to guide clinical decision making in this population. Drinking alcohol during pregnancy can have negative consequences on both fetus and mother, but it remains controversial as to the volume of alcohol consumption that correlates with these consequences. Likewise, little evidence is available to support the use of particular pharmacologic interventions for AUDs during pregnancy or to guide the management of alcohol detoxification in pregnant women. The use of benzodiazepines (the mainstay of most alcohol detoxification protocols) in pregnant women is controversial. Nevertheless, despite the lack of robust data to guide management of AUDs in pregnancy, clinicians need to make management decisions when confronted with these challenging situations. In that context, this article reviews the epidemiology of AUDs in pregnancy and the pharmacologic management of both AUDs and alcohol withdrawal in pregnant women, with the goal of informing clinicians about what is known about managing these co-occurring conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey DeVido
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco, CA
- McLean Hospital, Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA
| | - Olivera Bogunovic
- McLean Hospital, Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA
| | - Roger D. Weiss
- McLean Hospital, Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bortes C, Geidne S, Eriksson C. Preventing Alcohol Consumption during Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Health (London) 2015. [DOI: 10.4236/health.2015.73033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|