1
|
Liu Z, Zou K, Liu D, Zhang M, Shi Y, Chen Z, Lang B, Cheng X, Li H, Zeng L, Tang Y, Zhao S, Choonara I, Jiang Y, Zhang L. The price and affordability of essential medicines, progress and regional distribution in China: a systematic review. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1153972. [PMID: 37214447 PMCID: PMC10195994 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1153972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Essential medicine is a vital component to assure universal access to quality healthcare. However, the trend of affordability to essential medicines in China and its regional differences were not yet fully understood. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the price and affordability of essential medicines, their progress, and regional distribution in China in the last decades. Methods: We searched seven databases and three websites for potentially eligible studies from inception until March 2022. Studies on the price and affordability of essential medicines investigated in China were included. Median and interquartile range (IQR) was used to describe the price and affordability of essential medicines, and compared in three periods, before 2009, from 2009 to 2014, and from 2015 to 2019. Subgroup analysis was performed to examine the price and affordability by regions, health facilities, and ATC categories of medicines. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022310173). Results: A total of 65 studies including 11,639 health facilities investigated between 2006 and 2019 were included in this review. Median price ratios (MPR) and affordability of essential medicines were reported in 44 studies and 50 studies, respectively. The median MPRs of essential medicines in China was 1.59 (IQR: 5.39), with a tendency to rise first and then fall from 2006 to 2019. And the median affordability was equal to 0.88 (IQR: 2.58) days' wage of the lowest paid unskilled government worker, but steadily rose from 2006 to 2019. Subgroup analysis showed that the affordability in the western region (1.40, IQR: 2.88), urban area (0.95, IQR: 2.80), private sector (0.90, IQR: 2.30), of originator brands (OB) (2.90, IQR: 6.68), and antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents (5.68, IQR: 56.47) were worse than their counterparts. Conclusion: The prices of essential medicine were higher than international level, the overall affordability of essential medicines in China is acceptable but poor in the western region, for OB drugs and anti-cancer medicines. Further national essential medicine policies are needed to reduce regional disparities and improve the affordability of expensive drugs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kun Zou
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuqing Shi
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhe Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bingchen Lang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiao Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Hailong Li
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Linan Zeng
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Tang
- School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shaoyang Zhao
- School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Imti Choonara
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yongmu Jiang
- School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lingli Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pantoja T, Peñaloza B, Cid C, Herrera CA, Ramsay CR, Hudson J. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 5:CD011703. [PMID: 35502614 PMCID: PMC9062704 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011703.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug insurance schemes are systems that provide access to medicines on a prepaid basis and could potentially improve access to essential medicines and reduce out-of-pocket payments for vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects on drug use, drug expenditure, healthcare utilisation and healthcare outcomes of alternative policies for regulating drug insurance schemes. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, nine other databases, and two trials registers between November 2014 and September 2020, including a citation search for included studies on 15 September 2021 using Web of Science. We screened reference lists of all the relevant reports that we retrieved and reports from the Background section. Authors of relevant papers, relevant organisations, and discussion lists were contacted to identify additional studies, including unpublished and ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We planned to include randomised trials, non-randomised trials, interrupted time-series studies (including controlled ITS [CITS] and repeated measures [RM] studies), and controlled before-after (CBA) studies. Two review authors independently assessed the search results and reference lists of relevant reports, retrieved the full text of potentially relevant references and independently applied the inclusion criteria to those studies. We resolved disagreements by discussion, and when necessary by including a third review author. We excluded studies of the following pharmaceutical policies covered in other Cochrane Reviews: those that determined how decisions were made about which conditions or drugs were covered; those that placed restrictions on reimbursement for drugs that were covered; and those that regulated out-of-pocket payments for drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies and assessed risk of bias for each study, with disagreements being resolved by consensus. We used the criteria suggested by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) to assess the risk of bias of included studies. For randomised trials, non-randomised trials and controlled before-after studies, we planned to report relative effects. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported the risk ratio (RR) when possible and adjusted for baseline differences in the outcome measures. For interrupted time series and controlled interrupted time-series studies, we computed changes along two dimensions: change in level; and change in slope. We undertook a structured synthesis following the EPOC guidance on this topic, describing the range of effects found in the studies for each category of outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We identified 58 studies that met the inclusion criteria (25 interrupted time-series studies and 33 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (54) assessed a single policy implemented in the United States (US) healthcare system: Medicare Part D. The other four assessed other drug insurance schemes from Canada and the US, but only one of them provided analysable data for inclusion in the quantitative synthesis. The introduction of drug insurance schemes may increase prescription drug use (low-certainty evidence). On the other hand, Medicare Part D may decrease drug expenditure measured as both out-of-pocket spending and total drug spending (low-certainty evidence). Regarding healthcare utilisation, drug insurance policies (such as Medicare Part D) may lead to a small increase in visits to the emergency department. However, it is uncertain whether this type of policy increases or decreases hospital admissions or outpatient visits by beneficiaries of the scheme because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Likewise, it is uncertain if the policy increases or reduces health outcomes such as mortality because the certainty of the evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The introduction of drug insurance schemes such as Medicare Part D in the US health system may increase prescription drug use and may decrease out-of-pocket payments by the beneficiaries of the scheme and total drug expenditures. It may also lead to a small increase in visits to the emergency department by the beneficiaries of the policy. Its effects on other healthcare utilisation outcomes and on health outcomes are uncertain because of the very low certainty of the evidence. The applicability of this evidence to settings outside US healthcare is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Pantoja
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Blanca Peñaloza
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Camilo Cid
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Cristian A Herrera
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Craig R Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guindon GE, Fatima T, Garasia S, Khoee K. A systematic umbrella review of the association of prescription drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:297. [PMID: 35241088 PMCID: PMC8895849 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07554-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing spending and use of prescription drugs pose an important challenge to governments that seek to expand health insurance coverage to improve population health while controlling public expenditures. Patient cost-sharing such as deductibles and coinsurance is widely used with aim to control healthcare expenditures without adversely affecting health. METHODS We conducted a systematic umbrella review with a quality assessment of included studies to examine the association of prescription drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health. We searched five electronic bibliographic databases, hand-searched eight specialty journals and two working paper repositories, and examined references of relevant reviews. At least two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted the characteristics, methods, and main results, and assessed the quality of each included study. RESULTS We identified 38 reviews. We found consistent evidence that having drug insurance and lower cost-sharing among the insured were associated with increased drug use while the lack or loss of drug insurance and higher drug cost-sharing were associated with decreased drug use. We also found consistent evidence that the poor, the chronically ill, seniors and children were similarly responsive to changes in insurance and cost-sharing. We found that drug insurance and lower drug cost-sharing were associated with lower healthcare services utilization including emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient visits. We did not find consistent evidence of an association between drug insurance or cost-sharing and health. Lastly, we did not find any evidence that the association between drug insurance or cost-sharing and drug use, health services use or health differed by socioeconomic status, health status, age or sex. CONCLUSIONS Given that the poor or near-poor often report substantially lower drug insurance coverage, universal pharmacare would likely increase drug use among lower-income populations relative to higher-income populations. On net, it is probable that health services use could decrease with universal pharmacare among those who gain drug insurance. Such cross-price effects of extending drug coverage should be included in costing simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Emmanuel Guindon
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Room 229, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Tooba Fatima
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Room 229, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Sophiya Garasia
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Room 229, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kimia Khoee
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Room 229, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
CLARKE LORCAN, ANDERSON MICHAEL, ANDERSON ROB, KLAUSEN MORTENBONDE, FORMAN REBECCA, KERNS JENNA, RABE ADRIAN, KRISTENSEN SØRENRUD, THEODORAKIS PAVLOS, VALDERAS JOSE, KLUGE HANS, MOSSIALOS ELIAS. Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities. Milbank Q 2021; 99:974-1023. [PMID: 34472653 PMCID: PMC8718591 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. While there is a large amount of literature on the economic aspects of delivering primary care services, there is a need for more comprehensive overviews of this evidence. In this article, we offer such an overview. Evidence suggests that there are several strategies involving coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements which can, if implemented, have positive economic impacts on the delivery of primary care services. These include arrangements such as worker task-shifting and telemedicine. The implementation of any such arrangements, based on positive economic evidence, should carefully account for potential impacts on overall health care access and quality. There are many opportunities for further research, with notable gaps in evidence on the impacts of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONTEXT The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. To strengthen primary health care, policymakers need guidance on how to allocate resources in a manner that maximizes its economic benefits. METHODS We collated and synthesized published systematic reviews of evidence on the economic aspects of different models of delivering primary care services. Building on previous efforts, we adapted existing taxonomies of primary care components to classify our results according to four categories: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance. FINDINGS We identified and classified 109 reviews that met our inclusion criteria according to our taxonomy of primary care components: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements. A significant body of evidence suggests that several specific primary care arrangements, such as health workers' task shifting and telemedicine, can have positive economic impacts (such as lower overall health care costs). Notably absent were reviews on the impact of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONCLUSIONS There is a great opportunity for further research to systematically examine the broader economic impacts of investing in primary care services. Despite progress over the last decade, significant evidence gaps on the economic implications of different models of primary care services remain, which could help inform the basis of future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LORCAN CLARKE
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Trinity College Dublin
| | | | | | | | | | - JENNA KERNS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
| | | | | | | | | | - HANS KLUGE
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe)
| | - ELIAS MOSSIALOS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Imperial College London
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perehudoff K, Demchenko I, Alexandrov NV, Brutsaert D, Ackon A, Durán CE, El-Dahiyat F, Hafidz F, Haque R, Hussain R, Salenga R, Suleman F, Babar ZUD. Essential Medicines in Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review of Public Health Law Interventions and How They Are Measured in Five Middle-Income Countries. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E9524. [PMID: 33353250 PMCID: PMC7765934 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Very few studies exist of legal interventions (national laws) for essential medicines as part of universal health coverage in middle-income countries, or how the effect of these laws is measured. This study aims to critically assess whether laws related to universal health coverage use five objectives of public health law to promote medicines affordability and financing, and to understand how access to medicines achieved through these laws is measured. This comparative case study of five middle-income countries (Ecuador, Ghana, Philippines, South Africa, Ukraine) uses a public health law framework to guide the content analysis of national laws and the scoping review of empirical evidence for measuring access to medicines. Sixty laws were included. All countries write into national law: (a) health equity objectives, (b) remedies for users/patients and sanctions for some stakeholders, (c) economic policies and regulatory objectives for financing (except South Africa), pricing, and benefits selection (except South Africa), (d) information dissemination objectives (ex. for medicines prices (except Ghana)), and (e) public health infrastructure. The 17 studies included in the scoping review evaluate laws with economic policy and regulatory objectives (n = 14 articles), health equity (n = 10), information dissemination (n = 3), infrastructure (n = 2), and sanctions (n = 1) (not mutually exclusive). Cross-sectional descriptive designs (n = 8 articles) and time series analyses (n = 5) were the most frequent designs. Change in patients' spending on medicines was the most frequent outcome measure (n = 5). Although legal interventions for pharmaceuticals in middle-income countries commonly use all objectives of public health law, the intended and unintended effects of economic policies and regulation are most frequently investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Perehudoff
- Law Center for Health and Life, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium;
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability, and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada
| | - Ivan Demchenko
- Forensic Medicine and Medical Law Department, National Medical University ‘O.O. Bogomolec’, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine;
| | - Nikita V. Alexandrov
- Global Health Law Groningen Research Centre, Department of Transboundary Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, 9700 AS Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - David Brutsaert
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium;
| | - Angela Ackon
- Directorate of Pharmacy, Ministry of Health, P. O. Box M 44 Accra, Ghana;
| | - Carlos E. Durán
- Clinical Pharmacology Research Group, Department of Basic & Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| | | | - Firdaus Hafidz
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia;
| | - Rezwan Haque
- Access to Information (a2i) Programme (Former Project Director, SWASTI), Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh;
- Department of Pharmacy (Adjunct), Ranada Prasad Shaha University, Narayanganj 1400, Bangladesh
| | - Rabia Hussain
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan;
- Commonwealth Pharmacists Association, London E1W 1AW, UK
| | - Roderick Salenga
- College of Pharmacy, University of the Philippines Manila, Metro Manila 1000, Philippines;
| | - Fatima Suleman
- Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa;
| | - Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith A, Barry M. Combining health technology assessment and health technology management to deliver cost-effective prescribing and cost containment - the Irish experience. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2020; 20:431-436. [PMID: 32909850 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1822739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health technology assessment (HTA) is a widely used process to systematically evaluate the properties, effects, and impacts of health technology, with the main purpose of informing policymaking in healthcare. However, to ensure optimal use of scarce healthcare budgets, there is a need to look beyond HTA - to post-reimbursement health technology management (HTM). AREAS COVERED This review aims to describe the significant impact HTA, in combination with HTM, has made to the cost-effective prescribing and cost-containment in Ireland. This review will cover a number of specific examples, such as; specific reimbursement criteria for sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto®) and evolocumab (Repatha®), the introduction of a reimbursement application system for lidocaine 5% medicated plaster (Versatis®), and the introduction of 'preferred' biosimilars for patent-expired biologic medicines. EXPERT OPINION Healthcare payers are increasingly recognizing the benefits of HTM particularly when used in conjunction with HTA. This review highlights several examples whereby significant cost-savings can be made through HTM of not only new drugs but also drugs which are already available on the market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Smith
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James' Hospital , Dublin 8, Ireland.,Medicines Management Programme, Health Service Executive, St. James' Hospital , Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Michael Barry
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James' Hospital , Dublin 8, Ireland.,Medicines Management Programme, Health Service Executive, St. James' Hospital , Dublin 8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ayorinde AA, Williams I, Mannion R, Song F, Skrybant M, Lilford RJ, Chen YF. Publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research: a multimethod study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Bias in the publication and reporting of research findings (referred to as publication and related bias here) poses a major threat in evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making. Although this bias has been well documented in clinical research, little is known about its occurrence and magnitude in health services and delivery research.
Objectives
To obtain empirical evidence on publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research; to examine current practice in detecting/mitigating this bias in health services and delivery research systematic reviews; and to explore stakeholders’ perception and experiences concerning such bias.
Methods
The project included five distinct but interrelated work packages. Work package 1 was a systematic review of empirical and methodological studies. Work package 2 involved a survey (meta-epidemiological study) of randomly selected systematic reviews of health services and delivery research topics (n = 200) to evaluate current practice in the assessment of publication and outcome reporting bias during evidence synthesis. Work package 3 included four case studies to explore the applicability of statistical methods for detecting such bias in health services and delivery research. In work package 4 we followed up four cohorts of health services and delivery research studies (total n = 300) to ascertain their publication status, and examined whether publication status was associated with statistical significance or perceived ‘positivity’ of study findings. Work package 5 involved key informant interviews with diverse health services and delivery research stakeholders (n = 24), and a focus group discussion with patient and service user representatives (n = 8).
Results
We identified only four studies that set out to investigate publication and related bias in health services and delivery research in work package 1. Three of these studies focused on health informatics research and one concerned health economics. All four studies reported evidence of the existence of this bias, but had methodological weaknesses. We also identified three health services and delivery research systematic reviews in which findings were compared between published and grey/unpublished literature. These reviews found that the quality and volume of evidence and effect estimates sometimes differed significantly between published and unpublished literature. Work package 2 showed low prevalence of considering/assessing publication (43%) and outcome reporting (17%) bias in health services and delivery research systematic reviews. The prevalence was lower among reviews of associations than among reviews of interventions. The case studies in work package 3 highlighted limitations in current methods for detecting these biases due to heterogeneity and potential confounders. Follow-up of health services and delivery research cohorts in work package 4 showed positive association between publication status and having statistically significant or positive findings. Diverse views concerning publication and related bias and insights into how features of health services and delivery research might influence its occurrence were uncovered through the interviews with health services and delivery research stakeholders and focus group discussion conducted in work package 5.
Conclusions
This study provided prima facie evidence on publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research. This bias does appear to exist, but its prevalence and impact may vary depending on study characteristics, such as study design, and motivation for conducting the evaluation. Emphasis on methodological novelty and focus beyond summative assessments may mitigate/lessen the risk of such bias in health services and delivery research. Methodological and epistemological diversity in health services and delivery research and changing landscape in research publication need to be considered when interpreting the evidence. Collection of further empirical evidence and exploration of optimal health services and delivery research practice are required.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016052333 and CRD42016052366.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimbola A Ayorinde
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Iestyn Williams
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Russell Mannion
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Fujian Song
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard J Lilford
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yen-Fu Chen
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vicentini M, Mancuso P, Giorgi Rossi P, Di Pede S, Pellati M, Gandolfi A, Zoboli D, Riccò D, Busani C, Ferretti A. A cluster randomized trial to measure the impact on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and proton pump inhibitor prescribing in Italy of distributing cost-free paracetamol to osteoarthritic patients. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:169. [PMID: 31810456 PMCID: PMC6896368 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paracetamol is recommended as first-line treatment for pain control in osteoarthritis because it has fewer side effects than do other therapeutic options, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Prescribing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as gastric bleeding prophylaxis in chronic NSAID users is also common, although not recommended. In Italy, paracetamol is not reimbursed by the National Health System. The aim of this trial was to test whether the availability to osteoarthritis patients of free paracetamol would decrease their use of NSAIDs and, as a secondary objective, whether opioid and PPI consumption would also decrease. METHODS Eight general practitioners (GPs) (59 patients) were randomized to usual care and 8 (58 patients) to the experimental arm, where prescribed paracetamol was directly distributed for free by the local hospital. After 6 months, paracetamol was also available for free in the control arm. The main outcome was the pre/post difference in average NSAID and PPI consumption. Differences between experimental and control arms in pre/post differences are reported, as registered by the drug prescription information system. RESULTS Average NSAID consumption decreased non-significantly, from 6.79 to 2.16 defined daily dose (DDD) in the experimental arm and from 3.19 to 2.97 DDD in the control group (p = 0.067). No changes were observed for PPIs (from 11.27 to 14.65 DDD and from 9.74 to 12.58 DDD in experimental and control arms, respectively, p = 0.788) or opioids (from 1.61 to 1.14 DDD and from 1.41 to 1.56 DDD in experimental and control arms, respectively, p = 0.419). When the intervention was extended to the control arm, no decrease in NSAID consumption was observed (from 2.46 to 2.43 DDD, p = 0.521). CONCLUSIONS Removing small economic barriers had small or no effect on the appropriateness of opioid or PPI prescribing to patients with osteoarthritis; a reduction in NSAID consumption cannot be ruled out. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02691754 (Approved February 24, 2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Vicentini
- Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy , Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pamela Mancuso
- Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy , Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy , Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Sara Di Pede
- Pharmaceutical Department, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Morena Pellati
- Primary Health Care, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alberto Gandolfi
- General Practitioner, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Daniela Zoboli
- Pharmaceutical Department, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Daniela Riccò
- Medical Directorate, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Corrado Busani
- Pharmaceutical Department, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ferretti
- Pharmaceutical Department, Local Health Authority AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Suleman F, Movik E. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of educational or regulatory policies targeting prescribers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD013478. [PMID: 31721159 PMCID: PMC6852004 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmaceuticals make an important contribution to people's health. Medicines, however, are frequently not used appropriately. Improving the use of medicines can improve health outcomes and save resources. On the other hand, regulatory and educational policies may have unintended effects on health and costs. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of pharmaceutical educational and regulatory policies targeting prescribers on medicine use, healthcare utilisation, health outcomes and costs (expenditures). SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registries in March 2018 and several other databases between 2014 and 2018. We reviewed the reference lists of included studies and other relevant reviews, contacted authors of relevant reviews and studies to identify additional studies, and did a citation search for all included studies using ISI Web of Science (searched 05 January 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials, non-randomised trials, interrupted time series studies, repeated measures studies and controlled before‒after studies of policies regulating who can prescribe medicines and other policies targeted at prescribers. We included in this category monitoring and enforcement of restrictions, generic prescribing, programmes to implement treatment guidelines, system-wide policies regarding monitoring medicine safety, and legislated or mandatory continuing education or quality improvement specifically targeted at prescribing. We defined 'policies' in this review as laws, rules, financial and administrative orders made by governments, non-governmental organisations or private insurers. We excluded interventions applied at the level of a single facility. For us to include a study, it had to include an objective measure of at least one of the following outcomes: medicine use, healthcare utilization, health outcomes, or costs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently reviewed abstracts and reference lists of relevant reports, assessed full-text studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence (GRADE). For all the steps in the above process we resolved disagreements by discussion. MAIN RESULTS We identified two studies that met our selection criteria: a controlled interrupted time series study evaluating a regulatory policy involving the monitoring of prescribing of benzodiazepines; and a controlled before‒after study of an educational policing involving mailed educational materials on prescribing for physicians and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) members as well as an intervention to regulate drug reimbursement. We are uncertain about the effects on medicine use of a regulatory policy involving the monitoring of prescribing with triplicate prescriptions, compared with no regulatory intervention (very low certainty evidence). We are also uncertain about the effects on medicine use, assessed through doctors' prescribing, and costs of an educational policy involving mailed educational materials on prescribing for physicians and HMO members, compared to no educational intervention or an intervention to regulate drug reimbursement (very low certainty evidence). Neither of the included studies measured healthcare utilization, health outcomes, or additional costs, if any, to patients. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain of the effects of educational or regulatory policies targeting prescribers due to very limited evidence of very low certainty. The impacts of these policies therefore need to be evaluated rigorously using appropriate study designs. Evaluations are needed across a range of settings, including low- and middle-income countries, and across different types of prescribers and medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Suleman
- University of KwaZulu‐NatalDiscipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health SciencesPrivate Bag X54001DurbanKZNSouth Africa4000
| | - Espen Movik
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stoker LJ, Heerdink ER, Janssen R, Egberts TCG. Effect of reimbursement restriction policy on the use of benzodiazepines in the Netherlands: an interrupted time series analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029148. [PMID: 31551375 PMCID: PMC6773356 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Use of benzodiazepines has health risks. Reimbursement was restricted in the Netherlands from January 2009 onwards with the goal to reduce chronic use and healthcare expenditures. The aim of this study is to assess the initial and long-term effects of this policy on benzodiazepine use. DESIGN Interrupted time series analysis, segmented regression models, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis. SETTING A 10% random sample of benzodiazepine dispensings by outpatient pharmacies between January 2002 and August 2015 were obtained from the PHARMO database. This database covered a catchment area representing about 3.6 million residents in 2015. PARTICIPANTS 2 500 800 benzodiazepine prescriptions from 128 603 patients were included. INTERVENTION Reimbursement restriction policy from January 2009 onwards. OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in: the volume of dispensed prescriptions and doses, the incidence, prevalence of incidental, regular and chronic use and discontinuation rates of benzodiazepines. RESULTS The volume of dispensed prescriptions and doses decreased by 12.5% (95% CI 9.0% to 15.9%) and 15.1% (95% CI 11.4% to 17.3%) respectively in January 2009 compared with December 2008. A clear initial effect on the overall incidence (-14.7%; 95% CI -19.8% to 9.6%) and the prevalence of incidental (-17.8%; 95% CI -23.9% to 11.7%), regular (-20.0%; 95% CI -26.1% to 13.9%) and chronic (-16.0%; 95% CI -23.1% to 8.9%) use was observed. A statistically significant reduction in the monthly trend per 1000 medication users was observed for the overall incidence (-0.017; 95% CI -0.031 to 0.003) and the prevalence of incidental (-3.624; 95% CI -4.996 to 2.252) but not for regular (-0.304; 95% CI -1.204 to 0.596) and chronic (0.136; 95% CI -0.858 to 1.130) use. Patients who started treatment before policy had a slightly higher probability of discontinuation (HR=1.013; 95% CI 1.004 to 1.022). CONCLUSIONS The reimbursement policy had a significant initial effect on the volume, incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use. In addition, there is a statistically significant reduction in the monthly trend of overall incidence and of the prevalence of incidental use. No statistically significant reduction in the monthly trend of chronic use, the main purpose of the reimbursement restriction, could be demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart Jan Stoker
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Clinical Pharmacy, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Eibert Roelof Heerdink
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Research Group Innovations of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Janssen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management/Health Care Governance, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- TRANZO, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Toine C G Egberts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wettstein DJ, Boes S. Effectiveness of National Pricing Policies for Patent-Protected Pharmaceuticals in the OECD: A Systematic Literature Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2019; 17:143-162. [PMID: 30367350 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0437-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to assess the current state of empirical research regarding the effectiveness of national pricing regulations of the patent-protected market for prescription pharmaceuticals. Effectiveness is understood to be the capacity of policies to have a desired impact on outcomes, such as health status, patient access, healthcare expenditure, and research investments, among others. METHODS A systematic review of the published literature on pricing regulations in OECD countries was performed. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and the OECD iLibrary databases were searched in September 2016 and December 2017, with an update in August 2018. Interrupted time series studies and additional empirical studies were included, as well as systematic reviews if appropriate methods were applied. The risk of bias was assessed based on the recommendations of the BMJ guidelines, Cochrane EPOC criteria, QHES instrument, HTA good practice guidelines, CRD's guidance and the CHEC criteria. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the suggestions from EPOC and GRADE. RESULTS Thirty-one publications met the inclusion criteria. Most of the assessed empirical research included therapeutic (TRP) and/or external reference pricing (ERP), with a clear majority focusing on TRP. The main outcomes that were analysed were drug prices, expenditures and drug use. For value-based pricing (VBP), only limited empirical data were found. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence that TRP may reduce pharmaceutical prices and expenditures in the short term. Furthermore, TRP may lead to substitution effects towards lower-priced pharmaceuticals. The effects of TRP on patient access, healthcare utilisation and R&D investments were found to be uncertain. No conclusions were drawn for ERP and VBP. No evidence was found for the effects on health outcomes for any of the analysed policies. There is a strong need for evidence generation regarding effective pricing policies, particularly for VBP, managed entry agreements and non-financial outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik J Wettstein
- Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| | - Stefan Boes
- Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stadhouders N, Kruse F, Tanke M, Koolman X, Jeurissen P. Effective healthcare cost-containment policies: A systematic review. Health Policy 2019; 123:71-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
13
|
Bandong AN, Leaver A, Mackey M, Ingram R, Shearman S, Chan C, Cameron ID, Moloney N, Mitchell R, Doyle E, Leyten E, Rebbeck T. Adoption and use of guidelines for whiplash: an audit of insurer and health professional practice in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:622. [PMID: 30089495 PMCID: PMC6083615 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3439-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Australia, the New South Wales (NSW) State Insurance Regulatory Authority has been continuously developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines to address the health and economic burden from whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Despite this, it is uncertain the extent to which the guidelines are followed. This study aimed to determine insurer and health professional compliance with recommendations of the 2014 NSW clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute WAD; and explore factors related to adherence. METHODS This was an observational study involving an audit of 288 randomly-selected claimant files from 4 insurance providers in NSW, Australia between March and October 2016. Data extracted included demographic, claim and injury details, use of health services, and insurer and health professional practices related to the guidelines. Analyses involved descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. RESULTS Median time for general practitioner medical consultation was 4 days post-injury and 25 days for physical treatment (e.g. physiotherapy). Rates of x-ray investigations were low (21.5%) and most patients (90%) were given active treatments in line with the guideline recommendations. The frequency of other practices recommended by the guidelines suggested lower guideline adherence in some areas such as; using the Quebec Task Force classification (19.9%); not using specialised imaging for WAD grades I and II (e.g. MRI, 45.8%); not using routine passive treatments (e.g. manual therapy, 94.0%); and assessing risk of non-recovery using relevant prognostic tools (e.g. Neck Disability Index, 12.8%). Over half of the claimants (59.0%) were referred to other professionals at 9-12 weeks post-injury, among which 31.2% were to psychologists and 68.8% to specialists (surgical specialists, 43.6%; WAD specialists, 20.5%). Legal representation and lodgment of full claim were associated with increased number of medical visits and imaging (ρ 0.23 to 0.3; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION There is evidence of positive uptake of some guideline recommendations by insurers and health professionals; however, there are practices that are not compliant and might lead to poor health outcomes and greater treatment cost. Organisational, regulatory and professional implementation strategies may be considered to change practice, improve scheme performance and ultimately improve outcomes for people with WAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aila Nica Bandong
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
- College of Allied Medical Professions, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
- Musculoskeletal Lab/Refshauge Lab (S218), Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney – Cumberland Campus, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141 Australia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Mackey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rodney Ingram
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Samantha Shearman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christen Chan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Macquarie University, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eoin Doyle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma Leyten
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Buja A, Toffanin R, Claus M, Ricciardi W, Damiani G, Baldo V, Ebell MH. Developing a new clinical governance framework for chronic diseases in primary care: an umbrella review. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020626. [PMID: 30056378 PMCID: PMC6067352 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our goal is to conceptualise a clinical governance framework for the effective management of chronic diseases in the primary care setting, which will facilitate a reorganisation of healthcare services that systematically improves their performance. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS Chronic Care Model by Wagner et aland Clinical Governance statement by Scally et alwere taken for reference. Each was reviewed, including their various components. We then conceptualised a new framework, merging the relevant aspects of both. INTERVENTIONS We conducted an umbrella review of all systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group to identify organisational interventions in primary care with demonstrated evidence of efficacy. RESULTS All primary healthcare systems should be patient-centred. Interventions for patients and their families should focus on their values; on clinical, professional and institutional integration and finally on accountability to patients, peers and society at large. These interventions should be shaped by an approach to their clinical management that achieves the best clinical governance, which includes quality assurance, risk management, technology assessment, management of patient satisfaction and patient empowerment and engagement. This approach demands the implementation of a system of organisational, functional and professional management based on a population health needs assessment, resource management, evidence-based and patient-oriented research, professional education, team building and information and communication technologies that support the delivery system. All primary care should be embedded in and founded on an active partnership with the society it serves. CONCLUSIONS A framework for clinical governance will promote an integrated effort to bring together all related activities, melding environmental, administrative, support and clinical elements to ensure a coordinated and integrated approach that sustains the provision of better care for chronic conditions in primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Buja
- Unit of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Cardiologic, Vascular, Thoracic Sciences and Public Health, Laboratory of Health Care Services and Health Promotion Evaluation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Mirko Claus
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular, Thoracic Sciences and Public Health, School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Department of Public Health, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Damiani
- Department of Public Health, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Baldo
- Unit of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Cardiologic, Vascular, Thoracic Sciences and Public Health, Laboratory of Health Care Services and Health Promotion Evaluation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mark H Ebell
- College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Greece, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Suh HS, Kim JA, Lee IH. Effects of a price cut reform on the cost and utilization of antidiabetic drugs in Korea: a national health insurance database study. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:429. [PMID: 29879966 PMCID: PMC5992837 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3255-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the potential widespread application and a significant need, the policy effectiveness of prescribed medications price controls has not been studied extensively. We aimed to explore the effects of a price cut introduced in April 1st of 2012 on the cost and utilization of antidiabetics in South Korea. METHODS We identified approximately four million outpatients who filed at least one diabetes-related claim during the index period (January 2010 to December 2012) using the National Health Insurance claims data. We performed interrupted time series analyses for cost and utilization of "overall," "reduced price," and "constant price" antidiabetics between January 2009 and June 2013, and measured the growth rate for incidents of medical and surgical procedures for diabetes-induced complications. RESULTS The segmented regression suggests that spending on overall and reduced price antidiabetics would drop by 6 and 23%, respectively; spending on constant price antidiabetics would rise by 16% in a year after the new pricing compared to if the policy were not in existence. There were a few immediate changes in utilization, and its trend indicated a significant decrease in reduced price antidiabetics and an increase in constant price antidiabetics. Incidents of medical and surgical procedures relating to diabetic complications were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS The Korean price cut program contained costs by immediately reducing the cost of pharmaceuticals without any major signals associated with compromised clinical conditions in diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae Sun Suh
- College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Jee-Ae Kim
- Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Wonju, South Korea
| | - Iyn-Hyang Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk-do, 38541, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Flinterman LE, Hek K, Korevaar JC, van Dijk L. Impact of a Restriction in Reimbursement on Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with an Increased Risk of Gastric Complications. Front Public Health 2018. [PMID: 29536002 PMCID: PMC5835029 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Governments have several options to reduce the increasing costs of health care, including restrictions for the reimbursement of medicines. Next to the intended effect of reduced costs for medicines, reimbursement restriction can have unintended effects such as patients refraining from their treatment which may lead to health problems and increased use of health care. An example of a reimbursement restriction is the one for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) that became effective in the Netherlands in January 2012. A major unintended effect of this measure could be that high-risk patients who start with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose aspirin (aspirin) and who have an increased risk of gastric complications for which they are prescribed PPIs refrain from this PPI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reimbursement restriction among high-risk users of NSAIDs or aspirin. Do these patients refrain from their PPI treatment and if so do they have an increased risk of gastric complications? Part of the patients starting with NSAIDs or aspirin have an increased risk of gastric complications due to their age, comorbidities, or co-medication. The incidence of PPI use during the 2 years before the reimbursement restriction (2010 and 2011) and 2 years after the introduction of the reimbursement restriction was compared for patients on NSAIDs or aspirin with an increased risk of developing gastric complications. Impact of age, sex, and social economic status (SES) was taken into account. Hospital admissions due to gastric complications were studied over the same period (2010–2013). Data were obtained from a large population-based primary care database and a hospital database. The use of PPIs in patients with an increased risk of gastric complications who started NSAID/aspirin increased from 40% in 2010 to 55% in 2013. No impact was found of age, sex, or SES. There was no increase in hospital admissions due to gastric complications after the reimbursement restriction. The reimbursement restriction on PPIs was not associated with any detectable unintended effects for patients with an increased risk of gastric complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda E Flinterman
- NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Karin Hek
- NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joke C Korevaar
- NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Herrera CA, Lewin S, Paulsen E, Ciapponi A, Opiyo N, Pantoja T, Rada G, Wiysonge CS, Bastías G, Garcia Marti S, Okwundu CI, Peñaloza B, Oxman AD. Governance arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD011085. [PMID: 28895125 PMCID: PMC5618451 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011085.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Governance arrangements include changes in rules or processes that determine authority and accountability for health policies, organisations, commercial products and health professionals, as well as the involvement of stakeholders in decision-making. Changes in governance arrangements can affect health and related goals in numerous ways, generally through changes in authority, accountability, openness, participation and coherence. A broad overview of the findings of systematic reviews can help policymakers, their technical support staff and other stakeholders to identify strategies for addressing problems and improving the governance of their health systems. OBJECTIVES To provide an overview of the available evidence from up-to-date systematic reviews about the effects of governance arrangements for health systems in low-income countries. Secondary objectives include identifying needs and priorities for future evaluations and systematic reviews on governance arrangements and informing refinements of the framework for governance arrangements outlined in the overview. METHODS We searched Health Systems Evidence in November 2010 and PDQ Evidence up to 17 December 2016 for systematic reviews. We did not apply any date, language or publication status limitations in the searches. We included well-conducted systematic reviews of studies that assessed the effects of governance arrangements on patient outcomes (health and health behaviours), the quality or utilisation of healthcare services, resource use (health expenditures, healthcare provider costs, out-of-pocket payments, cost-effectiveness), healthcare provider outcomes (such as sick leave), or social outcomes (such as poverty, employment) and that were published after April 2005. We excluded reviews with limitations that were important enough to compromise the reliability of the findings of the review. Two overview authors independently screened reviews, extracted data and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We prepared SUPPORT Summaries for eligible reviews, including key messages, 'Summary of findings' tables (using GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence) and assessments of the relevance of findings to low-income countries. MAIN RESULTS We identified 7272 systematic reviews and included 21 of them in this overview (19 primary reviews and 2 supplementary reviews). We focus here on the results of the 19 primary reviews, one of which had important methodological limitations. The other 18 were reliable (with only minor limitations).We grouped the governance arrangements addressed in the reviews into five categories: authority and accountability for health policies (three reviews); authority and accountability for organisations (two reviews); authority and accountability for commercial products (three reviews); authority and accountability for health professionals (seven reviews); and stakeholder involvement (four reviews).Overall, we found desirable effects for the following interventions on at least one outcome, with moderate- or high-certainty evidence and no moderate- or high-certainty evidence of undesirable effects. Decision-making about what is covered by health insurance- Placing restrictions on the medicines reimbursed by health insurance systems probably decreases the use of and spending on these medicines (moderate-certainty evidence). Stakeholder participation in policy and organisational decisions- Participatory learning and action groups for women probably improve newborn survival (moderate-certainty evidence).- Consumer involvement in preparing patient information probably improves the quality of the information and patient knowledge (moderate-certainty evidence). Disclosing performance information to patients and the public- Disclosing performance data on hospital quality to the public probably encourages hospitals to implement quality improvement activities (moderate-certainty evidence).- Disclosing performance data on individual healthcare providers to the public probably leads people to select providers that have better quality ratings (moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Investigators have evaluated a wide range of governance arrangements that are relevant for low-income countries using sound systematic review methods. These strategies have been targeted at different levels in health systems, and studies have assessed a range of outcomes. Moderate-certainty evidence shows desirable effects (with no undesirable effects) for some interventions. However, there are important gaps in the availability of systematic reviews and primary studies for the all of the main categories of governance arrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian A Herrera
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Public Health, School of MedicineMarcoleta 434SantiagoChile
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileEvidence Based Health Care ProgramSantiagoChile
| | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthPO Box 4404OsloNorway0403
- South African Medical Research CouncilHealth Systems Research UnitPO Box 19070TygerbergSouth Africa7505
| | | | - Agustín Ciapponi
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS‐CONICET)Argentine Cochrane CentreDr. Emilio Ravignani 2024Buenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1414CPV
| | - Newton Opiyo
- CochraneCochrane Editorial UnitSt Albans House, 57‐59 HaymarketLondonUKSW1Y 4QX
| | - Tomas Pantoja
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileEvidence Based Health Care ProgramSantiagoChile
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCentro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686MaculSantiagoChile
| | - Gabriel Rada
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileEvidence Based Health Care ProgramSantiagoChile
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Internal Medicine and Evidence‐Based Healthcare Program, Faculty of MedicineLira 44, Decanato Primer pisoSantiagoChile
| | - Charles S Wiysonge
- South African Medical Research CouncilCochrane South AfricaFrancie van Zijl Drive, Parow ValleyCape TownWestern CapeSouth Africa7505
- Stellenbosch UniversityCentre for Evidence‐based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCape TownSouth Africa
| | - Gabriel Bastías
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Public Health, School of MedicineMarcoleta 434SantiagoChile
| | - Sebastian Garcia Marti
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health PolicyBuenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1056ABH
| | - Charles I Okwundu
- Stellenbosch UniversityCentre for Evidence‐based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCape TownSouth Africa
| | - Blanca Peñaloza
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileEvidence Based Health Care ProgramSantiagoChile
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCentro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686MaculSantiagoChile
| | - Andrew D Oxman
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthPO Box 4404OsloNorway0403
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shafiq Y, Kösters JP, Muhammad A, Nakajima R. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of policies that determine which drugs are reimbursed. Hippokratia 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011614.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yasir Shafiq
- Aga Khan University Hospital; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health; Stadium Road PO Box 3500 Karachi Sindh Pakistan 74800
| | - Jan Peter Kösters
- Rigshospitalet; The Nordic Cochrane Centre; Blegdamsvej 9, 3343 Copenhagen Denmark DK-2100
| | | | - Rie Nakajima
- School of Pharmacy, Nihon University; Social and Administrative Pharmacy Science; Chiba Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Comparison of pharmaceutical policies to stimulate use of generics in Japan and Sweden. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
20
|
Iskrov G, Stefanov R. Criteria for Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making: An Emerging Public Health Challenge in Bulgaria. Balkan Med J 2016; 33:27-35. [PMID: 26966615 DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During times of fiscal austerity, means of reimbursement decision-making are of particular interest for public health theory and practice. Introduction of advanced health technologies, growing health expenditures and increased public scrutiny over drug reimbursement decisions have pushed governments to consider mechanisms that promote the use of effective health technologies, while constraining costs. AIMS The study's aim was to explore the current rationale of the drug reimbursement decision-making framework in Bulgaria. Our pilot research focused on one particular component of this process - the criteria used - because of the critical role that criteria are known to have in setting budgets and priorities in the field of public health. The analysis pursued two objectives: to identify important criteria relevant to drug reimbursement decision-making and to unveil relationships between theory and practice. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS The study was realized through a closed-ended survey on reimbursement criteria among four major public health stakeholders - medical professionals, patients, health authorities, and industry. Empirical outcomes were then cross-compared with the theoretical framework, as defined by current Bulgarian public health legislation. Analysis outlined what is done and what needs to be done in the field of public health reimbursement decision-making. RESULTS Bulgarian public health stakeholders agreed on 15 criteria to form a tentative optimal framework for drug reimbursement decision-making. The most apparent gap between the empirically found preferences and the official legislation is the lack of consideration for the strength of evidence in reimbursement decisions. CONCLUSION Bulgarian policy makers need to address specific gaps, such as formal consideration for strength of evidence, explicit role of efficiency criteria, and means to effectively empower patient and citizen involvement in public health decision-making. Drug reimbursement criteria have to be integrated into legitimate public health decision support tools that ensure the achievement of national public health objectives. These recommendations could be expanded to all Eastern European countries who share common public health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv Faculty of Public Health, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Rumen Stefanov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv Faculty of Public Health, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gray AL, Suleman F. The relevance of systematic reviews on pharmaceutical policy to low- and middle-income countries. Int J Clin Pharm 2015; 37:717-25. [PMID: 26177819 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0156-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rely on available evidence when devising and implementing pharmaceutical policies. Aim of the review To provide a critical overview of systematic reviews of pharmaceutical policies, with particular focus on the relevance of such reviews in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS A search for systematic reviews (SRs) of studies of the interventions of interest was conducted until May 2009 in MEDLINE, EconLit, CINAHL, the Cochrane site, ProQuest, EMBASE, JOLIS, ISI Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, International Network for Rational Use of Drugs, National Technical Information Service, Public Affairs Information Service, SourceOECD, the System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, and the WHO library database. The search was updated to July 2013, based on the yields of the initial search strategy. RESULTS 20 SRs that met all inclusion criteria were retrieved in full text. Four SRs were subsequently rejected on the basis of quality considerations and the findings of 16 SRs were extracted and their applicability in LMICs considered. Of these, 5 were Cochrane Reviews. All included SRs were published in English. SRs related to registration and classification policies, marketing policies, prescribing policies, reimbursement policies, policies on price and payments, co-payments and caps and multi-component policies were retrieved. No SRs related to patent and profit policies, sales and dispensing policies, policies that regulate the provision of health insurance, or policies on patient information were retrieved. CONCLUSION Only one of the systematic reviews retrieved utilised a study conducted in a developing country. The direct applicability of the evidence from these SRs in LMICs is limited. However, as middle-income countries move towards universal health coverage, the multi-component policies that govern reimbursement for medicines, and which impose caps on payments and co-payments by patients, may become more applicable. As such they will have direct implications for the practice of clinical pharmacy in such settings. Considerable effort will be needed to systemically review the available primary evidence from studies conducted in developing country settings, where such data exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Lofts Gray
- Division of Pharmacology, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P Bag 7, Congella, Durban, 4013, South Africa.
| | - Fatima Suleman
- Division of Pharmacy Practice, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yoo KB, Lee SG, Park S, Kim TH, Ahn J, Cho MH, Park EC. Effects of drug price reduction and prescribing restrictions on expenditures and utilisation of antihypertensive drugs in Korea. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e006940. [PMID: 26179644 PMCID: PMC4513484 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the quantitative effects of the drug price reduction on pharmaceutical expenditures and the new guidelines to restrict prescribing on drug utilisation for antihypertensive drugs. DESIGN We used an interrupted time series design with the National patient sample data of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in South Korea. METHODS 54,295 participants who were with primary hypertension from the National patient sample data of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service were included. The study period was from March 2011 to December 2013. The dependent variables were antihypertensive drug costs, antihypertensive drug cost per prescribing day, daily drug utilisation, average number of drugs per month, percentage of original drugs per prescription, drug overutilisation and prohibited combinations. Segmented regression analysis was used. RESULTS The drug price reduction reduced expenditure (US$-1.51, -10.2%), and the new guidelines reduced expenditures even more (US$-2.13; -16.2%). These policies saved US$4.22 (28%) of antihypertensive drug costs per patient in December 2013 compared to March 2012. Drug price reduction policy was introduced in April 2012. We established the policy effect by comparing it before (March 2012) with after(21 months later-December 2012). The effects of the guidelines decreased expenditures, daily drug utilisation and the average number of drugs per month more than did the drug price reduction. CONCLUSIONS Both policies saved money. The guidelines were more effective over time and had fewer side effects such as increasing daily drug utilisation and number of drugs than the effects of drug price reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki-Bong Yoo
- Department of Healthcare Management, Eulji University, Sungnam, South Korea
| | - Sang Gyu Lee
- Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sohee Park
- Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeonghoon Ahn
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mee-Hyun Cho
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-Cheol Park
- Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pantoja T, Peñaloza B, Cid C, Herrera CA, Bigdeli M. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of policies regulating drug insurance schemes. Hippokratia 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Pantoja
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine; Centro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686 Macul Santiago Chile
| | - Blanca Peñaloza
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine; Centro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686 Macul Santiago Chile
| | - Camilo Cid
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Department of Public Health, School of Medicine; Santiago Chile
| | - Cristian A Herrera
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Department of Public Health, School of Medicine; Santiago Chile
| | - Maryam Bigdeli
- World Health Organization; Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; Geneva Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Acosta A, Ciapponi A, Aaserud M, Vietto V, Austvoll‐Dahlgren A, Kösters JP, Vacca C, Machado M, Diaz Ayala DH, Oxman AD. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD005979. [PMID: 25318966 PMCID: PMC6703418 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005979.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmaceuticals are important interventions that could improve people's health. Pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing policies are used as cost-containment measures to determine or affect the prices that are paid for drugs. Internal reference pricing establishes a benchmark or reference price within a country which is the maximum level of reimbursement for a group of drugs. Other policies include price controls, maximum prices, index pricing, price negotiations and volume-based pricing. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of pharmaceutical pricing and purchasing policies on health outcomes, healthcare utilisation, drug expenditures and drug use. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), part of The Cochrane Library (including the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Register) (searched 22/10/2012); MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and MEDLINE, Ovid (searched 22/10/2012); EconLit, ProQuest (searched 22/10/2012); PAIS International, ProQuest (searched 22/10/2012); World Wide Political Science Abstracts, ProQuest (searched 22/10/2012); INRUD Bibliography (searched 22/10/2012); Embase, Ovid (searched 14/12/2010); NHSEED, part of The Cochrane Library (searched 08/12/2010); LILACS, VHL (searched 14/12/2010); International Political Science Abstracts (IPSA), Ebsco (searched (17/12/2010); OpenSIGLE (searched 21/12/10); WHOLIS, WHO (searched 17/12/2010); World Bank (Documents and Reports) (searched 21/12/2010); Jolis (searched 09/10/2011); Global Jolis (searched 09/10/2011) ; OECD (searched 30/08/2005); OECD iLibrary (searched 30/08/2005); World Bank eLibrary (searched 21/12/2010); WHO - The Essential Drugs and Medicines web site (browsed 21/12/2010). SELECTION CRITERIA Policies in this review were defined as laws; rules; financial and administrative orders made by governments, non-government organisations or private insurers. To be included a study had to include an objective measure of at least one of the following outcomes: drug use, healthcare utilisation and health outcomes or costs (expenditures); the study had to be a randomised trial, non-randomised trial, interrupted time series (ITS), repeated measures (RM) study or a controlled before-after study of a pharmaceutical pricing or purchasing policy for a large jurisdiction or system of care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Results were summarised in tables. There were too few comparisons with similar outcomes across studies to allow for meta-analysis or meaningful exploration of heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS We included 18 studies (seven identified in the update): 17 of reference pricing, one of which also assessed maximum prices, and one of index pricing. None of the studies were trials. All included studies used ITS or RM analyses. The quality of the evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Three reference pricing studies reported cumulative drug expenditures at one year after the transition period. Two studies reported the median relative insurer's cumulative expenditures, on both reference drugs and cost share drugs, of -18%, ranging from -36% to 3%. The third study reported relative insurer's cumulative expenditures on total market of -1.5%. Four reference pricing studies reported median relative insurer's expenditures on both reference drugs and cost share drugs of -10%, ranging from -53% to 4% at one year after the transition period. Four reference pricing studies reported a median relative change of 15% in reference drugs prescriptions at one year (range -14% to 166%). Three reference pricing studies reported a median relative change of -39% in cost share drugs prescriptions at one year (range -87% to -17%). One study of index pricing reported a relative change of 55% (95% CI 11% to 98%) in the use of generic drugs and -43% relative change (95% CI -67% to -18%) in brand drugs at six months after the transition period. The same study reported a price change of -5.3% and -1.1% for generic and brand drugs respectively six months after the start of the policy. One study of maximum prices reported a relative change in monthly sales volume of all statins of 21% (95% CI 19% to 24%) after one year of the introduction of this policy. Four studies reported effects on mortality and healthcare utilisation, however they were excluded because of study design limitations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The majority of the studies of pricing and purchasing policies that met our inclusion criteria evaluated reference pricing. We found that internal reference pricing may reduce expenditures in the short term by shifting drug use from cost share drugs to reference drugs. Reference pricing may reduce related expenditures with effects on reference drugs but the effect on expenditures of cost share drugs is uncertain. Reference pricing may increase the use of reference drugs and may reduce the use of cost share drugs. The analysis and reporting of the effects on patients' drug expenditures were limited in the included studies and administration costs were not reported. Reference pricing effects on health are uncertain due to lack of evidence. The effects of other purchasing and pricing policies are until now uncertain due to sparse evidence. However, index pricing may reduce the use of brand drugs, increase the use of generic drugs, and may also slightly reduce the price of the generic drug when compared with no intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Acosta
- Universidad Nacional de ColombiaDepartamento de FarmaciaAvenida Carrera 30 # 45, Bogotá, CundinamarcaEdificio FarmaciaBogotaBogota DCColombia111321
- Universidad de Buenos AiresFacultad de Medicina, Facultad de Farmacia y BioquímicaBuenos AiresArgentina
| | - Agustín Ciapponi
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS‐CONICET)Argentine Cochrane CentreDr. Emilio Ravignani 2024Buenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1414CPV
| | - Morten Aaserud
- Norwegian Medicines AgencyStatens legemiddelverkSven Oftedals vei 8OsloNorwayNO‐0950
| | - Valeria Vietto
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos AiresFamily and Community Medicine ServiceBuenos AiresArgentina
| | | | | | - Claudia Vacca
- Universidad Nacional de ColombiaGrupo RAMBogotaColombia
| | - Manuel Machado
- Universidad Nacional de ColombiaDepartamento de FarmaciaAvenida Carrera 30 # 45, Bogotá, CundinamarcaEdificio FarmaciaBogotaBogota DCColombia111321
| | - Diana Hazbeydy Diaz Ayala
- Universidad Nacional de ColombiaDepartamento de FarmaciaAvenida Carrera 30 # 45, Bogotá, CundinamarcaEdificio FarmaciaBogotaBogota DCColombia111321
| | - Andrew D Oxman
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthP.O. Box 4404, NydalenOsloNorwayN‐0403
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Impact of pharmaceutical policy interventions on utilization of antipsychotic medicines in Finland and Portugal in times of economic recession: interrupted time series analyses. Int J Equity Health 2014; 13:53. [PMID: 25062657 PMCID: PMC4126811 DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2013] [Accepted: 04/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To analyze the impacts of pharmaceutical sector policies implemented to contain country spending during the economic recession – a reference price system in Finland and a mix of policies including changes in reimbursement rates, a generic promotion campaign and discounts granted to the public payer in Portugal – on utilization of, as a proxy for access to, antipsychotic medicines. Methodology We obtained monthly IMS Health sales data in standard units of antipsychotic medicines in Portugal and Finland for the period January 2007 to December 2011. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate changes in overall use and generic market shares by comparing pre-policy and post-policy levels and trends. Results Both countries’ policy approaches were associated with slight, likely unintended, decreases in overall use of antipsychotic medicines and with increases in generic market shares of major antipsychotic products. In Finland, quetiapine and risperidone generic market shares increased substantially (estimates one year post-policy compared to before, quetiapine: 6.80% [3.92%, 9.68%]; risperidone: 11.13% [6.79%, 15.48%]. The policy interventions in Portugal resulted in a substantially increased generic market share for amisulpride (estimate one year post-policy compared to before: 22.95% [21.01%, 24.90%]; generic risperidone already dominated the market prior to the policy interventions. Conclusions Different policy approaches to contain pharmaceutical expenditures in times of the economic recession in Finland and Portugal had intended – increased use of generics – and likely unintended – slightly decreased overall sales, possibly consistent with decreased access to needed medicines – impacts. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and evaluating the effects of pharmaceutical policy interventions on use of medicines and health outcomes.
Collapse
|
26
|
Moe-Byrne T, Chambers D, Harden M, McDaid C. Behaviour change interventions to promote prescribing of generic drugs: a rapid evidence synthesis and systematic review. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e004623. [PMID: 24833683 PMCID: PMC4024596 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Revised: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise evidence on the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions to encourage prescribing of generic forms of prescription drugs where clinically appropriate in the UK National Health Service (NHS) and similar settings. DESIGN Systematic review. SEARCH STRATEGY We conducted a rapid evidence synthesis in two stages: First, we searched databases, such as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), for systematic reviews of interventions that reported outcomes related to utilisation of generic drugs. In the second stage, we searched several databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify primary studies of any interventions not covered by systematic reviews. DATA EXTRACTION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. Standardised quality assessment tools were used to assess study quality. Two reviewers were involved in data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS 10 reviews were included for the initial evidence synthesis, but most were of limited usefulness to our focused review question. One review evaluated the effect of prescribing policies using financial incentives and showed an increase in generic prescribing. Thirteen primary studies of other interventions were included for the rapid review. Two studies showed an increase in percentage of overall generic prescribing with an educational intervention; two studies showed an improvement in generic prescribing rates when physicians collaborated with pharmacists, though in one study this was not statistically significant; two US studies showed improvements in generic prescribing with electronic prescribing. Five out of seven studies showed positive results with multifaceted interventions. CONCLUSIONS The existing evidence remains insufficient to determine which behaviour change intervention or combination of interventions is most effective due to methodological weaknesses and conflicting results. Based on the evidence, financial incentives with educational intervention and audit/feedback look promising but decision-makers should take into account the practicality and costs of the interventions before implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Duncan Chambers
- University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, York, UK
| | - Melissa Harden
- University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pichetti S, Sermet C, Godman B, Campbell SM, Gustafsson LL. Multilevel analysis of the influence of patients' and general practitioners' characteristics on patented versus multiple-sourced statin prescribing in France. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2013; 11:205-218. [PMID: 23609765 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-013-0014-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The French National Health Insurance and the Ministry of Health have introduced multiple reforms in recent years to increase prescribing efficiency. These include guidelines, academic detailing, financial incentives for the prescribing and dispensing of generics drugs as well as a voluntary pay-for-performance programme. However, the quality and efficiency of prescribing could be enhanced potentially if there was better understanding of the dynamics of prescribing behaviour in France. OBJECTIVE To analyse the patient and general practitioner characteristics that influence patented versus multiple-sourced statin prescribing in France. METHODOLOGY Statistical analysis was performed on the statin prescribing habits from 341 general practitioners (GPs) that were included in the IMS-Health Permanent Survey on Medical Prescription in France, which was conducted between 2009 and 2010 and involved 14,360 patients. Patient characteristics included their age and gender as well as five medical profiles that were constructed from the diagnoses obtained during consultations. These were (1) disorders of lipoprotein metabolism, (2) heart disease, (3) diabetes, (4) complex profiles and (5) profiles based on other diagnoses. Physician characteristics included their age, gender, solo or group practice, weekly workload and payment scheme. RESULTS Patient age had a statistically significant impact on statin prescribing for patients in profile 1 (disorders of lipoprotein metabolism) and profile 3 (complex profiles) with a greater number of patented statins being prescribed for the youngest patients. For instance, patients older than 76 years with a complex profile were prescribed fewer patented statins than patients aged 68-76 years old with the same medical profile (coefficient: -0.225; p = 0.0008). By contrast, regardless of the patient's age, the medical profile did not affect the probability of prescribing a patented statin except in young patients with heart diseases who were prescribed a greater number of patented statins (coefficient: 0.3992; p = 0.0007). Prescribing was also statistically influenced by physician features, e.g., older male physicians were more likely to prescribe patented statins (coefficient: 0.245; p = 0.0417) and GPs practicing in groups were more likely to prescribe multiple sourced statins (coefficient: -0.178; p = 0.0338), which is an important finding of the study. GPs with a lower workload prescribed a greater number of patented statins. CONCLUSION There is significant variability in the prescribing of different statins among patient and physician profiles as well as between solo and group practices. Consequently, there are opportunities to target demand-side measures to enhance the prescribing of multiple-sourced statins. Further studies are warranted, in particular in other therapeutic classes, to provide a counter-balance to the considerable marketing activities of pharmaceutical companies.
Collapse
|
28
|
Raghavan R, Brown DS, Thompson H, Ettner SL, Clements LM, Key W. Medicaid expenditures on psychotropic medications for children in the child welfare system. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2012; 22:182-9. [PMID: 22537361 PMCID: PMC3373221 DOI: 10.1089/cap.2011.0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children in the child welfare system are the most expensive child population to insure for their mental health needs. The objective of this article is to estimate the amount of Medicaid expenditures incurred from the purchase of psychotropic drugs - the primary drivers of mental health expenditures - for these children. METHODS We linked a subsample of children interviewed in the first nationally representative survey of children coming into contact with U.S. child welfare agencies, the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW), to their Medicaid claims files obtained from the Medicaid Analytic Extract. Our data consist of children living in 14 states, and Medicaid claims for 4 years, adjusted to 2010 dollars. We compared expenditures on psychotropic medications in the NSCAW sample to a propensity score-matched comparison sample obtained from Medicaid files. RESULTS Children surveyed in NSCAW had over thrice the odds of any psychotropic drug use than the comparison sample. Each maltreated child increased Medicaid expenditures by between $237 and $840 per year, relative to comparison children also receiving medications. Increased expenditures on antidepressants and amphetamine-like stimulants were the primary drivers of these increased expenditures. On average, an African American child in NSCAW received $399 less expenditure than a white child, controlling for behavioral problems and other child and regional characteristics. Children scoring in the clinical range of the Child Behavior Checklist received, on average, $853 increased expenditure on psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSION Each child with child welfare involvement is likely to incur upwards of $1482 in psychotropic medication expenditures throughout his or her enrollment in Medicaid. Medicaid agencies should focus their cost-containment strategies on antidepressants and amphetamine-type stimulants, and expand use of instruments such as the Child Behavior Checklist to identify high-cost children. Both of these strategies can assist Medicaid agencies to better predict and plan for these expenditures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Raghavan
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hoebert JM, Souverein PC, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Leufkens HGM, van Dijk L. Reimbursement restriction and moderate decrease in benzodiazepine use in general practice. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10:42-9. [PMID: 22230829 PMCID: PMC3262472 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To limit misuse and save costs, on January 1, 2009, benzodiazepines were excluded from the Dutch reimbursement list when used as anxiolytic, hypnotic, or sedative. This study aims to assess the impact of this reimbursement restriction on benzodiazepine use in patients with newly diagnosed anxiety or sleeping disorder in general practice. METHODS Was conducted a retrospective observational database study deriving data on diagnoses and prescriptions from the electronic health records-based Netherlands Information Network of General Practice (LINH). We looked for patients aged 18 years and older with an incident diagnosis of sleeping disturbance (International Classification of Primary Care code: P06) or anxiety (P74, P01) between January 2008 and December 2009. Incidence of these diagnoses, benzodiazepine use, and initiation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment was compared between 2008 and 2009. RESULTS In total, we identified 13,596 patients with an incident diagnosis of anxiety (3,769 in 2008 and 3,710 in 2009) or sleeping disorder (3,254 in 2008 and 2,863 in 2009). The proportion of patients being prescribed a benzodiazepine after a diagnosis was lower in 2009 than in 2008 for both anxiety (30.1% vs. 33.7% P < .05) and sleeping disorder (59.1% vs. 67.0%, P < .05), as was the proportion of patients with more than 1 benzodiazepine prescription for both anxiety (36.4% vs. 42.6%, P < .05) and sleeping disorder (35.0% vs. 42.6%, P < .05). We found no increase in the use of alternative treatment for anxiety with SSRIs. CONCLUSIONS The reimbursement restriction has led to a moderate decrease in the number of incident diagnoses and initiation of benzodiazepine use in patients with newly diagnosed anxiety or sleeping disorder. This finding indicates that in settings where no such reimbursement opportunities exist, physicians have room to reduce benzodiazepine prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joëlle M Hoebert
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Calculation of direct antiretroviral treatment costs and potential cost savings by using generics in the German HIV ClinSurv cohort. PLoS One 2011; 6:e23946. [PMID: 21931626 PMCID: PMC3170283 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 07/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aim of the Study The study aimed to determine the cost impacts of antiretroviral drugs by analysing a long-term follow-up of direct costs for combined antiretroviral therapy, cART,-regimens in the nationwide long-term observational multi-centre German HIV ClinSurv Cohort. The second aim was to develop potential cost saving strategies by modelling different treatment scenarios. Methods Antiretroviral regimens (ART) from 10,190 HIV-infected patients from 11 participating ClinSurv study centres have been investigated since 1996. Biannual data cART,-initiation, cART-changes, surrogate markers, clinical events and the Centre of Disease Control- (CDC)-stage of HIV disease are reported. Treatment duration was calculated on a daily basis via the documented dates for the beginning and end of each antiretroviral drug treatment. Prices were calculated for each individual regimen based on actual office sales prices of the branded pharmaceuticals distributed by the license holder including German taxes. Results During the 13-year follow-up period, 21,387,427 treatment days were covered. Cumulative direct costs for antiretroviral drugs of €812,877,356 were determined according to an average of €42.08 per day (€7.52 to € 217.70). Since cART is widely used in Germany, the costs for an entire regimen increased by 13.5%. Regimens are more expensive in the advanced stages of HIV disease. The potential for cost savings was calculated using non-nucleotide-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor, NNRTI, more frequently instead of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, PI/r, in first line therapy. This calculation revealed cumulative savings of 10.9% to 19.8% of daily treatment costs (50% and 90% substitution of PI/r, respectively). Substituting certain branded drugs by generic drugs showed potential cost savings of between 1.6% and 31.8%. Conclusions Analysis of the data of this nationwide study reflects disease-specific health services research and will give insights into the cost impacts of antiretroviral therapy, and might allow a more rational allocation of resources within the German health care system.
Collapse
|
31
|
Aaserud M, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Sturm H, Kösters JP, Hill S, Furberg C, Grilli R, Henry DA, Oxman AD, Ramsay CR, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai SB. Pharmaceutical policies: effects on rational drug use. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2006. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004397.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Aaserud
- Norwegian Medicines Agency; Statens legemiddelverk; Sven Oftedals vei 8 Oslo Norway NO-0950
| | - Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; Postboks 7004 St. Olavsplass Oslo Norway 0130
| | - Heidrun Sturm
- University Medical Center Tübingen; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Herrenberger Str. 23 Tübingen Germany D 72070
| | - Jan Peter Kösters
- Rigshospitalet, 3343; Nordic Cochrane Centre; Blegdamsvej 9 Copenhagen Ø Denmark 2100
| | - Suzanne Hill
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle; Department of Clinical Pharmacology; Level 5, Clinical Sciences Building, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Edith Street, Waratah Newcastle New South Wales Australia 2298
| | - Curt Furberg
- Wake Forest University; Public Health Services; Winston-Salem USA
| | - Roberto Grilli
- Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale; viale Aldo Moro, 38 Bologna Italy 40127
| | - David A Henry
- Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2075 Bayview Avenue G1 06 Toronto Ontario Canada M4N 3M5
| | - Andrew D Oxman
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; Global Health Unit; P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs plass Oslo Norway N-0130
| | - Craig R Ramsay
- University of Aberdeen; Health Services Research Unit, Division of Applied Health Sciences; Polwarth Building Foresterhill Aberdeen UK AB25 2ZD
| | - Dennis Ross-Degnan
- Harvard Medical School; Drug Policy Research Group, Dept. of Population Medicine; 133 Brookline Avenue, 6th Floor Boston MA USA 02215
| | - Stephen B Soumerai
- Harvard Medical School; Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention; 133 Brookline Ave, 6th Floor Boston MA USA 02215
| |
Collapse
|