Granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Emerging aspects of cytokine storm in COVID-19: The role of proinflammatory cytokines and therapeutic prospects

COVID-19 has claimed millions of lives during the last 3 years since initial cases were reported in Wuhan, China, in 2019. Patients with COVID-19 suffer from severe pneumonia, high fever, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiple-organ dysfunction, which may also result in fatality in extreme cases. Cytokine storm (CS) is hyperactivation of the immune system, wherein the dysregulated production of proinflammatory cytokines could result in excessive immune cell infiltrations in the pulmonary tissues, resulting in tissue damage. The immune cell infiltration could also occur in other tissues and organs and result in multiple organs' dysfunction. The key cytokines implicated in the onset of disease severity include TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-1β, GM-CSF, and G-CSF. Controlling the CS is critical in treating COVID-19 disease. Therefore, different strategies are employed to mitigate the effects of CS. These include using monoclonal antibodies directed against soluble cytokines or the cytokine receptors, combination therapies, mesenchymal stem cell therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, and some non-conventional treatment methods to improve patient immunity. The current review describes the role/s of critical cytokines in COVID-19-mediated CS and the respective treatment modalities.

The Effects of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with a Large Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction to Prevent Left Ventricular Remodeling: A 10-Year Follow-Up of the RIGENERA Study

Background: the RIGENERA trial assessed the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the improvement of clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute myocardial infarction. However, there is no evidence available regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment. Methods: in order to evaluate the long-term effects on the incidence of major adverse events, on the symptom burden, on the quality of life and the mean life expectancy and on the left ventricular (LV) function, we performed a clinical and echocardiographic evaluation together with an assessment using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) at 10-years follow-up, in the patients cohorts enrolled in the RIGENERA trial. Results: thirty-two patients were eligible for the prospective clinical and echocardiography analyses. A significant reduction in adverse LV remodeling was observed in G-CSF group compared to controls, 9% vs. 48% (p = 0.030). The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was lower in G-CSF group vs. controls (p = 0.040), with lower burden of symptoms and higher quality of life (p = 0.049). The mean life expectancy was significantly higher in G-CSF group compared to controls (15 ± 4 years vs. 12 ± 4 years, p = 0.046. No difference was found in the incidence of major adverse events. Conclusions: this longest available follow-up on G-CSF treatment in patients with severe acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showed that this treatment was safe and associated with a reduction of adverse LV remodeling and higher quality of life, in comparison with standard-of-care treatment.

Post-MI treatment with G-CSF and EPO-liposome with SLX repairs infarcted myocardium through EPCs mobilization and activation of prosurvival signals in rabbits

We investigated whether combination therapy of G-CSF and erythropoietin (EPO)-liposome with Siaryl Lewis X (SLX) is more cardioprotective than G-CSF or EPO-liposome with SLX alone. For the purpose of generating myocardial infarction (MI), rabbits underwent 30 minutes of coronary occlusion and 14 days of reperfusion. We administered saline (control group, i.v.,), G-CSF (G group, 10 μg/kg/day × 5 days, i.c., starting at 24 hours after reperfusion), EPO-liposome with SLX (LE group, i.v., 2500 IU/kg EPO containing liposome with SLX, immediately after reperfusion), and G-CSF + EPO-liposome with SLX (LE + G group) to the rabbits. The MI size was the smallest in the LE+G group (14.7 ± 0.8%), and smaller in the G group (22.4 ± 1.5%) and LE group (18.5 ± 1.1%) than in the control group (27.8 ± 1.5%). Compared with the control group, the cardiac function and remodeling of the G, LE, and LE + G groups were improved, and LE + G group tended to show the best improvement. The number of CD31-positive microvessels was the greatest in the LE + G group, greater in the G and LE groups than in the control group. Higher expressions of phosphorylated (p)-Akt and p-ERK were observed in the ischemic area of the LE and LE + G groups. The number of CD34+/CXCR4+ cells was significantly higher in the G and LE + G groups. The cardiac SDF-1 was more expressed in the G and LE + G groups. In conclusion, Post-MI combination therapy with G-CSF and EPO-liposome with SLX is more cardioprotective than G-CSF or EPO-liposome with SLX alone through EPCs mobilization, neovascularization, and activation of prosurvival signals.

Stem cells and heart disease - Brake or accelerator?

After two decades of intensive research and attempts of clinical translation, stem cell based therapies for cardiac diseases are not getting closer to clinical success. This review tries to unravel the obstacles and focuses on underlying mechanisms as the target for regenerative therapies. At present, the principal outcome in clinical therapy does not reflect experimental evidence. It seems that the scientific obstacle is a lack of integration of knowledge from tissue repair and disease mechanisms. Recent insights from clinical trials delineate mechanisms of stem cell dysfunction and gene defects in repair mechanisms as cause of atherosclerosis and heart disease. These findings require a redirection of current practice of stem cell therapy and a reset using more detailed analysis of stem cell function interfering with disease mechanisms. To accelerate scientific development the authors suggest intensifying unified computational data analysis and shared data knowledge by using open-access data platforms.

The Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Animal Models: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Atherosclerosis is a common inflammatory disease. Stem cell and endothelial progenitor cell treatments can improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a mobilisation agent, mobilising stem cells from the bone marrow to circulation in the blood. G-CSF may constitute a treatment of atherosclerosis. We have conducted meta-analysis to evaluate the current evidence for the effect of G-CSF on the progression of atherosclerosis in animal models and to provide reference for preclinical experiments and future human clinical trials of atherosclerosis treatment.

Methods

We searched several databases and conducted a meta-analysis across seven articles using a random-effect model. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Version 5.2 and Stata 12.0.

Results

We found that G-CSF therapy was associated with reduced atherosclerotic lesion area (weighted mean difference (WMD): 7.29%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.06-12.52%; P = 0.006). No significant differences in total serum cholesterol (P = 0.54) and triglyceride levels (P = 0.95) were noted in G-CSF treatment groups compared with controls. Multivariable metaregression analysis revealed that the animal type (rabbit, P = 0.022) and frequency of G-CSF administration (>20, P = 0.007) impacted the atherosclerotic lesion area changes.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis suggested that G-CSF treatment might inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis in animal models.

Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity and target cells: a broader perspective

The cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin is becoming an interdisciplinary point of interest given a growing population of cancer survivors. The complex and not completely understood pathogenesis of this complication makes difficult to design successful preventive or curative measures. Although cardiomyocyte has been considered a classical cellular target, other cells including various types of undifferentiated cells are involved in myocardial homeostasis. Such perspective may shed light on previously unrecognized aspects of cardiotoxicity and promote new experimental and clinical cardioprotective strategies. In this review, different cellular targets of doxorubicin are discussed with the focus on cardiac progenitor cells, oxidative stress, DNA damage, senescence and apoptosis all of which contribute to their compromised functional properties.

Sitagliptin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction: A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial of efficacy and safety (SITAGRAMI trial)

OBJECTIVE

In animal models, G-CSF based progenitor cell mobilization combined with a DPP4 inhibitor leads to increased homing of bone marrow derived progenitor cells to the injured myocardium via the SDF1/CXCR4 axis resulting in improved ejection fraction and survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

After successful revascularization in AMI, 174 patients were randomized 1:1 in a multi-centre, prospective, placebo-controlled, parallel group, double blind, phase III efficacy and safety trial to treatment with G-CSF and Sitagliptin (GS) or placebo. Diabetic and non-diabetic patients were included in our trial. The primary efficacy endpoint hierarchically combined global left and right ventricular ejection fraction changes from baseline to 6 months of follow-up (ΔLVEF, ΔRVEF), as determined by cardiac MRI.

RESULTS

At follow-up ΔLVEF as well as ΔRVEF did not differ between the GS and placebo group. Patients in the placebo group had a similar risk for a major adverse cardiac event within 12 months of follow-up as compared to patients under GS.

CONCLUSION

Progenitor cell therapy comprising the use of G-CSF and Sitagliptin after successfully revascularized acute myocardial infarction fails to show a beneficial effect on cardiac function and clinical events after 12 months. (EudraCT: 2007-003,941-34; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00650143, funding: Heinz-Nixdorf foundation).

Pharmacological Elevation of Circulating Bioactive Phosphosphingolipids Enhances Myocardial Recovery After Acute Infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) triggers mobilization of bone marrow (BM)-derived stem/progenitor cells (BMSPCs) through poorly understood processes. Recently, we postulated a major role for bioactive lipids such as sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) in mobilization of BMSPCs into the peripheral blood (PB). We hypothesized that elevating S1P levels after AMI could augment BMSPC mobilization and enhance cardiac recovery after AMI. After AMI, elevating bioactive lipid levels was achieved by treating mice with the S1P lyase inhibitor tetrahydroxybutylimidazole (THI) for 3 days (starting at day 4 after AMI) to differentiate between stem cell mobilization and the known effects of S1P on myocardial ischemic pre- and postconditioning. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography, and myocardial scar size evolution was examined using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. PB S1P and BMSPCs peaked at 5 days after AMI and returned to baseline levels within 10 days (p < .05 for 5 days vs. baseline). Elevated S1P paralleled a significant increase in circulating BMSPCs (p < .05 vs. controls). We observed a greater than twofold increase in plasma S1P and circulating BMSPCs after THI treatment. Mechanistically, enhanced BMSPC mobilization was associated with significant increases in angiogenesis, BM cell homing, cardiomyocytes, and c-Kit cell proliferation in THI-treated mice. Mice treated with THI demonstrated better recovery of cardiac functional parameters and a reduction in scar size. Pharmacological elevation of plasma bioactive lipids after AMI could contribute to BMSPC mobilization and could represent an attractive strategy for enhancing myocardial recovery and improving BMSC targeting.

SIGNIFICANCE

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) initiates innate immune and reparatory mechanisms through which bone marrow-derived stem/progenitor cells (BMSPCs) are mobilized toward the ischemic myocardium and contribute to myocardial regeneration. Although it is clear that the magnitude of BMSPC mobilization after AMI correlates with cardiac recovery, the molecular events driving BMSPC mobilization and homing are poorly understood. The present study confirms the role of bioactive lipids in BMSPC mobilization after AMI and proposes a new strategy that improves cardiac recovery. Inhibiting sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) lyase (SPL) allows for the augmentation of the plasma levels of S1P and stem cell mobilization. These findings demonstrate that early transient SPL inhibition after MI correlates with increased stem cell mobilization and their homing to the infarct border zones. Augmenting BMSPC mobilization correlated with the formation of new blood vessels and cardiomyocytes and c-Kit cell proliferation. These novel findings on the cellular level were associated with functional cardiac recovery, reduced adverse remodeling, and a decrease in scar size. Taken together, these data indicate that pharmacological elevation of bioactive lipid levels can be beneficial in the early phase after cardiac ischemic injury. These findings provide the first evidence that a carefully timed transient pharmacological upregulation of bioactive lipids after AMI could be therapeutic, because it results in significant cardiac structural and functional improvements.

Cardiac Nerve Growth Factor Overexpression Induces Bone Marrow-derived Progenitor Cells Mobilization and Homing to the Infarcted Heart

Reparative response by bone marrow (BM)-derived progenitor cells (PCs) to ischemia is a multistep process that comprises the detachment from the BM endosteal niche through activation of osteoclasts and proteolytic enzymes (such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)), mobilization to the circulation, and homing to the injured tissue. We previously showed that intramyocardial nerve growth factor gene transfer (NGF-GT) promotes cardiac repair following myocardial infarction (MI) in mice. Here, we investigate the impact of cardiac NGF-GT on postinfarction BM-derived PCs mobilization and homing at different time points after adenovirus-mediated NGF-GT in mice. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry newly illustrate the temporal profile of osteoclast and activation of MMP9, PCs expansion in the BM, and liberation/homing to the injured myocardium. NGF-GT amplified these responses and increased the BM levels of active osteoclasts and MMP9, which were not observed in MMP9-deficient mice. Taken together, our results suggest a novel role for NGF in BM-derived PCs mobilization/homing following MI.

Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor

Previous studies suggest that diabetes impairs hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In this study, we tested whether the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor, differently from G-CSF, is effective in mobilizing HSCs in patients with diabetes. In a prospective study, individuals with and without diabetes (n = 10/group) were administered plerixafor to compare CD34(+) HSC mobilization; plerixafor was equally able to mobilize CD34(+) HSCs in the two groups, whereas in historical data, G-CSF was less effective in patients with diabetes. In a retrospective autologous transplantation study conducted on 706 patients, diabetes was associated with poorer mobilization in patients who received G-CSF with/without chemotherapy, whereas it was not in patients who received G-CSF plus plerixafor. Similarly in an allogeneic transplantation study (n = 335), diabetes was associated with poorer mobilization in patients who received G-CSF. Patients with diabetes who received G-CSF without plerixafor had a lower probability of reaching >50/μL CD34(+) HSCs, independent from confounding variables. In conclusion, diabetes negatively impacted HSC mobilization after G-CSF with or without chemotherapy but had no effect on mobilization induced by G-CSF with plerixafor. This finding has major implications for the care of patients with diabetes undergoing stem cell mobilization and transplantation and for the vascular regenerative potential of bone marrow stem cells.

Combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 treatment in cardiac repair after myocardial infarction

AIMS

Several studies suggest that circulating bone marrow derived stem cells promote the regeneration of ischemic tissues. For hematopoietic stem cell transplantation combinatorial granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)/Plerixafor (AMD3100) administration was shown to enhance mobilization of bone marrow derived stem cells compared to G-CSF monotherapy. Here we tested the hypothesis whether combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 therapy has beneficial effects in cardiac recovery in a mouse model of myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We analyzed the effect of single G-CSF (250 µg/kg/day) and combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 (100 µg/kg/day) treatment on cardiac morphology, vascularization, and hemodynamics 28 days after permanent ligation of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). G-CSF treatment started directly after induction of myocardial infarction (MI) for 3 consecutive days followed by a single AMD3100 application on day three after MI in the G-CSF/AMD3100 group. Cell mobilization was assessed by flow cytometry of blood samples drawn from tail vein on day 0, 7, and 14.

RESULTS

Peripheral blood analysis 7 days after MI showed enhanced mobilization of white blood cells (WBC) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) upon G-CSF and combinatorial G-CSF/AMD3100 treatment. However, single or combinatorial treatment showed no improvement in survival, left ventricular function, and infarction size compared to the saline treated control group 28 days after MI. Furthermore, no differences in histology and vascularization of infarcted hearts could be observed.

CONCLUSION

Although the implemented treatment regimen caused no adverse effects, our data show that combinatorial G-CSF/AMD therapy does not promote myocardial regeneration after permanent LAD occlusion.