1
|
Brick R, Padgett L, Jones J, Wood KC, Pergolotti M, Marshall TF, Campbell G, Eilers R, Keshavarzi S, Flores AM, Silver JK, Virani A, Livinski AA, Ahmed MF, Kendig T, Khalid B, Barnett J, Borhani A, Bernard G, Lyons KD. The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1725-1750. [PMID: 35218521 PMCID: PMC8881759 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize delivery features and explore effectiveness of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions that address disability in adult cancer survivors. METHODS A systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library: Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, National Health Service's Health Technology Assessment, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted in December 2019 and updated in April 2021. RESULTS Searches identified 3,499 unique studies. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. There were 81 unique interventions across included studies. Interventions were primarily delivered post-treatment and lasted an average of 16.5 weeks (SD = 13.1). They were most frequently delivered using telephone calls (59%), administered delivered by nursing professionals (35%), and delivered in a one-on-one format (88%). Risk of bias of included studies was primarily moderate to high. Included studies captured 55 measures of disability. Only 54% of reported outcomes had data that allowed calculation of effect sizes ranging -3.58 to 15.66. CONCLUSIONS The analyses suggest small effects of telehealth-based cancer interventions on disability, though the heterogeneity seen in the measurement of disability makes it hard to draw firm conclusions. Further research using more diverse samples, common measures of disability, and pragmatic study designs is needed to advance telehealth in cancer rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions have the potential to increase access to care designed to reduce disability across the cancer care continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle Brick
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
| | - Lynne Padgett
- VA Central Office, Health Services Research and Development, 1100 1st St NE, Suite 6, Washington, DC, 20002, USA
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Sr. PMB-B-045, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Kelley Covington Wood
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4714 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg, PA, 17055, USA
| | - Mackenzi Pergolotti
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4714 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg, PA, 17055, USA
| | - Timothy F Marshall
- Ivy Rehab Network, 1311 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 140, White Plains, NY, 10605, USA
| | - Grace Campbell
- Duquesne University School of Nursing, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15282, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at UPMC Magee, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Rachel Eilers
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA
| | - Sareh Keshavarzi
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Biostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 North Michigan Avenue, 11th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 North Michigan Avenue, 11th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Julie K Silver
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aneesha Virani
- Department of Rehabilitation Services, Northside Hospital, 1000 Johnson Ferry Road, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA
| | - Alicia A Livinski
- National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, OD, NIH, MSC 1150, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Mohammed Faizan Ahmed
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Sr. PMB-B-045, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Tiffany Kendig
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, 4714 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg, PA, 17055, USA
| | - Bismah Khalid
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1VT, Canada
| | - Jeremy Barnett
- George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I St. NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
| | - Anita Borhani
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Sr. PMB-B-045, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Graysen Bernard
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Sr. PMB-B-045, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Kathleen Doyle Lyons
- Department of Occupational Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown Navy Yard, Building 79/96, 79 13th Street, Boston, MA, 02129, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
After 55 Years of Neurorehabilitation, What Is the Plan? Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12080982. [PMID: 35892423 PMCID: PMC9330852 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12080982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurological disorders often cause severe long-term disabilities with substantial activity limitations and participation restrictions such as community integration, family functioning, employment, social interaction and participation. Increasing understanding of brain functioning has opened new perspectives for more integrative interventions, boosting the intrinsic central nervous system neuroplastic capabilities in order to achieve efficient behavioral restitution. Neurorehabilitation must take into account the many aspects of the individual through a comprehensive analysis of actual and potential cognitive, behavioral, emotional and physical skills, while increasing awareness and understanding of the new self of the person being dealt with. The exclusive adoption by the rehabilitator of objective functional measures often overlooks the values and goals of the disabled person. Indeed, each individual has their own rhythm, unique life history and personality construct. In this challenging context, it is essential to deepen the assessment through subjective measures, which more adequately reflect the patient’s perspective in order to shape genuinely tailored instead of standardized neurorehabilitation approaches. In this overly complex panorama, where confounding and prognostic factors also strongly influence potential functional recovery, the healthcare community needs to rethink neurorehabilitation formats.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wells KJ, Drizin JH, Ustjanauskas AE, Vázquez-Otero C, Pan-Weisz TM, Ung D, Carrizosa C, Laronga C, Roetzheim RG, Johnson K, Norton M, Aguilar RC, Quinn GP. The psychosocial needs of underserved breast cancer survivors and perspectives of their clinicians and support providers. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:105-116. [PMID: 34231040 PMCID: PMC8639634 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06286-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer survivors (BrCS) experience many psychosocial difficulties following treatment, leading to an increased risk of psychological distress compared to the general population. This is especially true for underserved BrCS whose unmet supportive care needs can result in worse physical and mental health outcomes. This qualitative study compared healthcare and support providers' perceptions of BrCS' needs to survivors' perceptions of their own needs. METHODS Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 underserved BrCS and 20 cancer survivorship stakeholders identified using purposeful sampling. Using the constant comparison method and content analysis, data were analyzed via an iterative process of coding and discussion. Data were summarized according to three intermediate and proximal themes mentioned by both stakeholders and survivors: (1) psychosocial needs of cancer survivors, (2) support, and (3) benefit finding/positive feelings about cancer. Demographic data were analyzed by calculating descriptive statistics. RESULTS There was consistency in providers' and survivors' perceptions of post-treatment mood changes, financial burden, familial stress, and physical changes. Providers and survivors differed in perceptions of BrCS' preferred sources of care and support, effects of cancer treatment on body image, the effects of fear of cancer recurrence on follow-up care, and benefit finding. CONCLUSIONS This study provides valuable insight into areas in which healthcare and support providers' perceptions may differ from underserved BrCS' lived experiences. Results from this study can be used to develop interventions and inform healthcare and support providers on how to provide high-quality care to underserved BrCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen J. Wells
- San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA; SDSU/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Julia H. Drizin
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Amy E. Ustjanauskas
- Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Coralia Vázquez-Otero
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tonya M. Pan-Weisz
- Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Departments of OB-GYN, Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, NY, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qiao X, Zhang Y, Sun L, Ma Q, Yang J, Ai L, Xue J, Chen G, Zhang H, Ji C, Gu X, Lei H, Yang Y, Liu C. Association of human breast cancer CD44 -/CD24 - cells with delayed distant metastasis. eLife 2021; 10:65418. [PMID: 34318746 PMCID: PMC8346282 DOI: 10.7554/elife.65418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor metastasis remains the main cause of breast cancer-related deaths, especially delayed breast cancer distant metastasis. The current study assessed the frequency of CD44-/CD24- breast cancer cells in 576 tissue specimens for associations with clinicopathological features and metastasis and investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms. The results indicated that higher frequency (≥19.5%) of CD44-/CD24- cells was associated with delayed postoperative breast cancer metastasis. Furthermore, CD44-/CD24-triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells spontaneously converted into CD44+/CD24-cancer stem cells (CSCs) with properties similar to CD44+/CD24-CSCs from primary human breast cancer cells and parental TNBC cells in terms of stemness marker expression, self-renewal, differentiation, tumorigenicity, and lung metastasis in vitro and in NOD/SCID mice. RNA sequencing identified several differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in newly converted CSCs and RHBDL2, one of the DEGs, expression was upregulated. More importantly, RHBDL2 silencing inhibited the YAP1/USP31/NF-κB signaling and attenuated spontaneous CD44-/CD24- cell conversion into CSCs and their mammosphere formation. These findings suggest that the frequency of CD44-/CD24- tumor cells and RHBDL2 may be valuable for prognosis of delayed breast cancer metastasis, particularly for TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinbo Qiao
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yixiao Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Dapartment of Urology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lisha Sun
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qingtian Ma
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Liping Ai
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jinqi Xue
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Guanglei Chen
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ce Ji
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.,Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xi Gu
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Haixin Lei
- Institute of Cancer Stem Cell, Cancer Center, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yongliang Yang
- Center for Molecular Medicine, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Caigang Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharkawi E, Artes PH, Lindegger DJ, Dari ML, Wardani ME, Pasquier J, Guarnieri A. Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 259:3019-3026. [PMID: 34155560 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05244-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to report on outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) in eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). METHODS This study is a prospective, interventional, non-comparative case series. A total of 103 eyes from 88 patients with PACG underwent an ab interno trabeculotomy, using either a 5.0 polypropylene suture or an illuminated microcatheter, with up to 24 months of follow-up. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, success rate (IOP reduction ≥ 20% from baseline or IOP between 6 and 21 mmHg, without further glaucoma surgery) and complication rate. RESULTS The mean preoperative IOP was 21.4 (SD 7.4) mmHg using 2.5 (SD 1.1) glaucoma medications. These decreased postoperatively to 12.1 (SD 2.4) mmHg and 0.8 (SD 1.2) medications, at 24 months (P < 0.05). Success rate was 78% at 24 months of follow-up, and complication rate was 4.8%. CONCLUSION At 24 months of follow-up, our results for GATT in PACG demonstrate that this procedure effectively lowers IOP in this subtype of glaucoma, with a low complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eamon Sharkawi
- Swiss Eye Centre, Avenue de Rumine 64, Lausanne, 1005, Switzerland.
| | - Paul H Artes
- University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Southwest Eye Institute, Tavistock, UK
| | | | - Maria Laura Dari
- Swiss Eye Centre, Avenue de Rumine 64, Lausanne, 1005, Switzerland
| | | | - Jérôme Pasquier
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prospective study of shoulder strength, shoulder range of motion, and lymphedema in breast cancer patients from pre-surgery to 5 years after ALND or SLNB. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:3277-3287. [PMID: 29651594 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4186-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine the changes in shoulder strength, shoulder range of motion, and arm volume in breast cancer patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) METHOD: Sixty-eight SLNB and 44 ALND patients were followed up from pre-surgery to 5 years after surgery. Primary outcomes were the differences between affected and non-affected sides for the following: shoulder strength measured by dynamometry, shoulder range of motion measured by goniometry, and lymphedema measured by volume. As a secondary outcome, health-related quality of life (HRQL) was assessed by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for breast cancer (FACT-B+4) questionnaires. Changes over time were tested for SLNB and ALND using univariate repeated measures analysis of variance. Generalized estimating equation models were constructed to assess the effect of SLNB and ALND over time. RESULTS After 5 years, the ALND group had significant loss of strength for internal rotators (1.39 kg, p = 0.001) and significant arm volume increase (132.45 mL, p = 0.031). The ALND group had a greater number of patients with clinically relevant internal rotator strength loss (38.7 vs. 13.6%, p = 0.012) and a greater number of lymphedema requiring treatment (33.3 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) than the SLNB group. A loss of strength for shoulder external rotators, shoulder range of motion, and HRQL in physical and arm domains persisted at 5 years in both SLNB and ALND groups. CONCLUSION These results could help understand and plan the prevention, needs, and long-term care of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Duncan M, Moschopoulou E, Herrington E, Deane J, Roylance R, Jones L, Bourke L, Morgan A, Chalder T, Thaha MA, Taylor SC, Korszun A, White PD, Bhui K. Review of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life in cancer survivors. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e015860. [PMID: 29187408 PMCID: PMC5719270 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Over two million people in the UK are living with and beyond cancer. A third report diminished quality of life. DESIGN A review of published systematic reviews to identify effective non-pharmacological interventions to improve the quality of life of cancer survivors. DATA SOURCES Databases searched until May 2017 included PubMed, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO. STUDY SELECTION Published systematic reviews of randomised trials of non-pharmacological interventions for people living with and beyond cancer were included; included reviews targeted patients aged over 18. All participants had already received a cancer diagnosis. Interventions located in any healthcare setting, home or online were included. Reviews of alternative therapies or those non-English reports were excluded. Two researchers independently assessed titles, abstracts and the full text of papers, and independently extracted the data. OUTCOMES The primary outcome of interest was any measure of global (overall) quality of life. ANALYTICAL METHODS Quality assessment assessing methdological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) and narrative synthesis, evaluating effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and their components. RESULTS Of 14 430 unique titles, 21 were included in the review of reviews. There was little overlap in the primary papers across these reviews. Thirteen reviews covered mixed tumour groups, seven focused on breast cancer and one focused on prostate cancer. Face-to-face interventions were often combined with online, telephone and paper-based reading materials. Interventions included physical, psychological or behavioural, multidimensional rehabilitation and online approaches. Yoga specifically, physical exercise more generally, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) programmes showed benefit in terms of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Exercise-based interventions were effective in the short (less than 3-8 months) and long term. CBT and MBSR also showed benefits, especially in the short term. The evidence for multidisciplinary, online and educational interventions was equivocal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morvwen Duncan
- Academic Psychological Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Elisavet Moschopoulou
- Centre for Psychiatry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Eldrid Herrington
- Blizard Institute, National Bowel Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Deane
- Academic Psychological Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Roylance
- University College Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College Medical School, London, UK
| | - Liam Bourke
- Cancer Research Group, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
- Health & Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
| | - Adrienne Morgan
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute – Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Trudie Chalder
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, Denmark Hill, King’s College, London, UK
| | - Mohamed A Thaha
- Blizard Institute, National Bowel Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephanie C. Taylor
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Ania Korszun
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Peter D. White
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Amatya B, Khan F, Galea MP. Optimizing post-acute care in breast cancer survivors: a rehabilitation perspective. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017; 10:347-357. [PMID: 28919774 PMCID: PMC5587162 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s117362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Therapeutic advances and improved survival rates of women with BC have implications for long-term impact on disability, psychological function and quality of life (QoL), which may be amenable to rehabilitation. The focus of rehabilitation is on managing disability, reducing sequelae and symptoms, and enhancing participation and societal reintegration, to achieve the highest possible independence and the best QoL. Rehabilitation interventions should be considered early for maintaining functional capacity and reducing the risk of losing important abilities or independence and should be individualized depending on disease phase, functional deficits, personal requirements and specific goals. A number of interventions have been trialled to support rehabilitation input for women with BC, which include physical therapy, psychological interventions (psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral training) and others. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation and uni-disciplinary interventions such as physical therapy have been shown to be beneficial in reducing disability, and improving participation and QoL. There is a need for comprehensive assessment of health domains in BC patients using a standardized framework and a common language for describing the impact of disease at different levels, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core sets. This will provide more detailed information on the needs of these patients, so more efficient and targeted rehabilitation interventions can be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhasker Amatya
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Fary Khan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary P Galea
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about Exercise after Breast Cancer? Physiother Can 2016; 68:408. [PMID: 27904241 DOI: 10.3138/ptc.68.4.cochrane] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
10
|
Perrier L, Adhihetty C, Soobiah C. Examining semantics in interprofessional research: A bibliometric study. J Interprof Care 2016; 30:269-77. [DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1142430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
11
|
Khan F, Amatya B, Ng L, Drummond K, Galea M. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation after primary brain tumour treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD009509. [PMID: 26298178 PMCID: PMC6481476 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009509.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain tumours can cause significant disability, which may be amenable to multidisciplinary rehabilitation. However, the evidence base for this is unclear. This review is an update of a previously published review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [2013, Issue 1, Art. No. CD009509] on 'Multidisciplinary rehabilitation after primary brain tumour treatment'. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in people after primary brain tumour treatment, especially the types of approaches that are effective (settings, intensity). SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library up to Issue 12 of 12, 2014), MEDLINE (1950 to January week 2, 2015), EMBASE (1980 to January week 2, 2015), PEDro (1985 to January week 2 2015), and LILACS (1982 to January week 2, 2015). We checked the bibliographies of papers we identified and contacted the authors and known experts in the field to seek published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Controlled clinical trials (randomised and non-randomised clinical trials) that compared multidisciplinary rehabilitation in primary brain tumour with either routinely available local services or lower levels of intervention, or studies that compared multidisciplinary rehabilitation in different settings or at different levels of intensity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three review authors independently assessed study quality, extracted data, and performed a 'best evidence ' synthesis based on methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS We did not identify any studies for inclusion in the previous version of this review. For this update, the literature search identified one low-quality controlled clinical trial involving 106 participants. The findings from this study suggest 'low-level' evidence to support high-intensity ambulatory (outpatient) multidisciplinary rehabilitation in reducing short- and long-term motor disability (continence, mobility and locomotion, cognition), when compared with standard outpatient care. We found improvement in some domains of disability (continence, communication) and psychosocial gains were maintained at six months follow-up. We found no evidence for improvement in overall participation (quality of life and societal relationship). No adverse events were reported as a result of multidisciplinary rehabilitation. We found no evidence for improvement in quality of life or cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation. It was also not possible to suggest best 'dose' of therapy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Since the last version of this review, one new study has been identified for inclusion. The best evidence to date comes from this CCT, which provides low quality evidence that higher intensity ambulatory (outpatient) multidisciplinary rehabilitation reduces short- and long-term disability in people with brain tumour compared with standard outpatient care. Our conclusions are tentative at best, given gaps in current research in this area. Although the strength of evidence has increased with the identification of a new controlled clinical trial in this updated review, further research is needed into appropriate and robust study designs; outcome measurement; caregiver needs; evaluation of optimal settings; type, intensity, duration of therapy; and cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in the brain tumour population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fary Khan
- Monash UniversityDisability Inclusive Unit, Nossal Institute of Global Health & School of Public Health and Preventative MedicineThe Alfred Centre99 Commercial RoadMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
- The Royal Melbourne HospitalDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicineMelbourneAustralia
- University of MelbourneDepartment of MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | - Bhasker Amatya
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park CampusDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicinePoplar RoadParkvilleMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Louisa Ng
- The Royal Melbourne HospitalDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | - Kate Drummond
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park CampusDepartment of NeuroscienceGrattan StreetParkvilleVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Mary Galea
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park CampusDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicinePoplar RoadParkvilleMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Loh SY, Musa AN. Methods to improve rehabilitation of patients following breast cancer surgery: a review of systematic reviews. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2015; 7:81-98. [PMID: 25792854 PMCID: PMC4360828 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s47012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Context Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer amongst women but it has the highest survival rates amongst all cancer. Rehabilitation therapy of post-treatment effects from cancer and its treatment is needed to improve functioning and quality of life. This review investigated the range of methods for improving physical, psychosocial, occupational, and social wellbeing in women with breast cancer after receiving breast cancer surgery. Method A search for articles published in English between the years 2009 and 2014 was carried out using The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. Search terms included: ‘breast cancer’, ‘breast carcinoma’, ‘surgery’, ‘mastectomy’, ‘lumpectomy’, ‘breast conservation’, ‘axillary lymph node dissection’, ‘rehabilitation’, ‘therapy’, ‘physiotherapy’, ‘occupational therapy’, ‘psychological’, ‘psychosocial’, ‘psychotherapy’, ‘exercise’, ‘physical activity’, ‘cognitive’, ‘occupational’, ‘alternative’, ‘complementary’, and ‘systematic review’. Study selection Systematic reviews on the effectiveness of rehabilitation methods in improving post-operative physical, and psychological outcomes for breast cancer were selected. Sixteen articles met all the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Data extraction Included review year, study aim, total number of participants included, and results. Data synthesis Evidence for exercise rehabilitation is predominantly in the improvement of shoulder mobility and limb strength. Inconclusive results exist for a range of rehabilitation methods (physical, psycho-education, nutritional, alternative-complementary methods) for addressing the domains of psychosocial, cognitive, and occupational outcomes. Conclusion There is good evidence for narrowly-focused exercise rehabilitation in improving physical outcome particularly for shoulder mobility and lymphedema. There were inconclusive results for methods to improve psychosocial, cognitive, and occupational outcomes. There were no reviews on broader performance areas and lifestyle factors to enable effective living after treatment. The review suggests that comprehensiveness and effectiveness of post-operative breast cancer rehabilitation should consider patients’ self-management approaches towards lifestyle redesign, and incorporate health promotion aspects, in light of the fact that breast cancer is now taking the form of a chronic illness with longer survivorship years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siew Yim Loh
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Aisya Nadia Musa
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Qiao E, Ji M, Wu J, Ma R, Zhang X, He Y, Zha Q, Song X, Zhu LW, Tang J. Expression of the PXR gene in various types of cancer and drug resistance. Oncol Lett 2013; 5:1093-1100. [PMID: 23599746 PMCID: PMC3628904 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2012] [Accepted: 01/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-regulated transcription factors. PXR is a key xenobiotic receptor that regulates the expression of genes implicated in drug metabolism, detoxification and clearance, including drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters, suggesting that it is significant in the drug resistance of cancer cells. PXR is expressed in a wide range of tissues in the human body. Studies have demonstrated that PXR is expressed in a variety of tumor types, correlating not only with drug resistance but also with the cell proliferation, apoptosis and prognosis of cancer. The purpose of the present review is to provide a comprehensive review of PXR and its potential roles in multidrug resistance and the biological characteristics of PXR-positive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enqi Qiao
- Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|