Feasibility study of using Stereotactic Field Diode for field output factors measurement and evaluating three new detectors for small field relative dosimetry of 6 and 10 MV photon beams

Comparative assessment and QA measurement array validation of Monte Carlo and Collapsed Cone dose algorithms for small fields and clinical treatment plans

PURPOSE

Many studies have demonstrated superior performance of Monte Carlo (MC) over type B algorithms in heterogeneous structures. However, even in homogeneous media, MC dose simulations should outperform type B algorithms in situations of electronic disequilibrium, such as small and highly modulated fields. Our study compares MC and Collapsed Cone (CC) dose algorithms in RayStation 12A. Under consideration are 6 MV and 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams, relevant for VMAT plans such as head-and-neck and stereotactic lung treatments with heterogeneities, as well as plans for multiple brain metastases in one isocenter, involving highly modulated small fields. We aim to investigate collimator angle dependence of small fields and performance differences between different combinations of ArcCHECK configuration and dose algorithm.

METHODS

Several verification tests were performed, ranging from simple rectangular fields to highly modulated clinical plans. To evaluate and compare the performance of the models, the agreements between calculation and measurement are compared between MC and CC. Measurements include water tank measurements for test fields, ArcCHECK measurements for test fields and VMAT plans, and film dosimetry for small fields.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In very small or narrow fields, our measurements reveal a strong dependency of dose output to collimator angle for VersaHD with Agility MLC, reproduced by both dose algorithms. ArcCHECK results highlight a suboptimal agreement between measurements and MC calculations for simple rectangular fields when using inhomogeneous ArcCHECK images. Therefore, we advocate for the use of homogeneous phantom images, particularly for static fields, in ArcCHECK verification with MC. MC might offer performance benefits for more modulated treatment fields. In ArcCHECK results for clinical plans, MC performed comparable to CC for 6 MV. For 6 MV FFF and the preferred homogeneous phantom image, MC resulted in consistently better results (13%-64% lower mean gamma index) compared to CC.

Particular issues to be considered in small field dosimetry for TrueBeam STx commissioning

This study aims to report the relevant issues concerning small fields in the commissioning of a TrueBeam STx for photon energies of 6MV, 10MV, 6FFF, and 10FFF. Percent depth doses, profiles, and field output factors were measured according to the beam model configuration of the treatment planning system. Multiple detectors were used based on the IAEA TRS-483 protocol as well as EBT3 radiochromic film. Analytical Anisotropic and Acuros XB algorithms, were configured and validated through basic dosimetry comparisons and end-to-end clinical tests.

Field output correction factors of small static field for IBA razor nanochamber

Purpose.The goal of this work is present results of field output factors (OF) using an IBA CC003 (Razor NanoChamber) and compare these results with PTW 60019 (MicroDiamond) and IBA Razor Diode. The experimental results for IBA CC003 were also compared with Monte Carlo (MC) Simulation, using Penelope and Ulysses programs. In addition, field output correction factors (kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr) for IBA CC003 were derived with three different methods: (1) using PTW 60019 and IBA Razor as reference detectors; (2) comparison between MC and experimental measurements; and (3) using only MC.Material and Methods. The beam collimation included in this study were (1) square field size between 10 × 10 and 0.5 × 0.5 cm2defined by the MLC and jaws and (2) cones of different diameters. For IBA CC003 it was determined the polarity and ion collection efficiency correction factors in parallel and perpendicular orientation.Results.The results indicate (1) the variation of polarity effect with the field size is relevant for the determination of OF using IBA CC003, especially for parallel orientation; (2) there is no significant variation of the ion collection efficiency with the field size using IBA CC003 in parallel orientation; (3) OF differences between IBA CC003 and PTW 60019/IBA Razor, and experimental and MC results, increase with decreasing field size;ThekQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrresults indicate (1) using the first and second method,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrincrease with decreasing field size, which can be related with the influence of the volume effect and (2) using the third method,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrdecrease with decreasing field size, which can be explained by the perturbation effect.Conclusions. Our results demonstrate the need of applyingkQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor IBA CC003 forSclin≤1 cm, to compensate for volume averaging and perturbations effects.

Evaluation of scanning resolution, detector choice and detector orientation to be used for accurate and time-efficient commissioning of a 6MV clinical linear accelerator

The present study is aimed at exploring different scanning parameters, detectors and their orientations for time-efficient and accurate commissioning of a 6 MV clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). Beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) curves were measured with a PTW dosimetry diode, a PTW Semiflex and a PinPoint ion chamber in different orientations. To acquire beam data, equidistant (step size of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm) and fanline (step size of 2-0.5 mm, 2-1 mm, 3-0.5 mm and 3-1 mm) scanning modes were employed and data measurement time was recorded. Scan time per measurement point was also varied (0.2 s, 0.5 s and 1.0 s) to investigate its effect on the accuracy and acquisition time of beam data. Accuracy of the measured data was analyzed on the basis of the variation between measured data and data modeled by a treatment planning system. Beam profiles (particularly in penumbra region) were found to be sensitive to variation in scanning resolution and showed an improved accuracy with decrease in step size, while PDD curves were affected negligibly. The accuracy of beam data obtained with the PTW dosimetry diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was higher than those obtained with the PTW Semiflex ion chamber for small fields (2 × 2 cm² and 3 × 3 cm²). However, the response of the PTW diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was significantly indifferent in these fields. Furthermore, axial orientation of the PTW Semiflex ion chamber improved accuracy of profiles and PDDs as compared to radial orientation, while such a difference was not significant for the PinPoint ion chamber. It is concluded that a scan time of 0.2 s/point with a fanline scanning resolution of 2-1 mm for beam profiles and 3 mm for PDDs are most favorable in terms of accuracy and time efficiency. For small fields (2 × 2 cm² and 3 × 3 cm²), a PinPoint ion chamber in radial orientation or a dosimetry diode in axial orientation are recommended for both beam profiles and PDDs. If a PinPoint ion chamber and a PTW dosimetry diode are not available, a Semiflex ion chamber in axial orientation may be used for small fields.

Determination of correction factors in small MLC-defined fields for the Razor and microSilicon diode detectors and evaluation of the suitability of the IAEA TRS-483 protocol for multiple detectors

Small field output factors for Multileaf collimator (MLC)‐defined field sizes between 0.5 × 0.5 cm² and 3 × 3 cm² were measured with six different detectors for a Varian TrueBeam in 6‐MV, 6‐FFF, 10‐MV, and 10‐FFF photon beams. Correction factors kQclin,Qreffclin,fref from the IAEA publication TRS‐483 were used to correct the measured output factors. The corrected output factors from the six detectors were used to calculate correction factors for the PTW microSilicon T60023 (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) and IBA Razor (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) detectors. The uncertainty of the output and correction factors in this study was calculated and the calculations presented in detail. The application of the TRS‐483 correction factors significantly reduced the variation in output factors between the various detectors, with the exception of the PTW 60016 diode in 6‐MV and 6‐FFF beams, and the IBA PFD in 10‐MV and 10‐FFF beams. Correction factors calculated for the Razor agreed within 2.9% of existing literature for all energies, while the microSilicon correction factors agreed within 1.6% to the literature for 6‐MV beams. The uncertainty in the microSilicon and Razor correction factors was calculated to be less than 0.9% (k = 1). This study shows that TRS‐483 correction factors reduce the variation in output factors between the detectors used in this study and presents a suitable method for determining correction factors for detectors with unpublished values.

Replacing gamma knife beam-profiles on film with point-detector scans

PURPOSE

Detector arrays and profile-scans have widely replaced film-measurements for quality assurance (QA) on linear accelerators. Film is still used for relative output factor (ROF) measurements, positioning, and dose-profile verification for annual Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) QA. This study shows that small-field active detector measurements can be performed in the easily accessed clinical mode and that they are an effective replacement to time-consuming and exacting film measurements.

METHODS

Beam profiles and positioning scans for 4-mm, 8-mm, and 16-mm-collimated fields were collected along the x-, y-, and z-axes. The Exradin W2-scintillator and the PTW microdiamond-detector were placed in custom inserts centered in the Elekta solid-water phantom for these scans. GafChromic EBT3-film was irradiated with single uniformly collimated exposures as the clinical-standard reference, using the same solid-water phantom for profile tests and the Elekta film holder for radiation focal point (RFP)/patient-positioning system (PPS) coincidence. All experimental data were compared to the tissue-maximum-ratio-based (TMR10) dose calculation.

RESULTS

The detector-measured beam profiles and film-based profiles showed excellent agreement with TMR10-predicted full-width, half-maximum (FWHM) values. Absolute differences between the measured FWHM and FWHM from the treatment-planning system were on average 0.13 mm, 0.08 mm, and 0.04 mm for film, microdiamond, and scintillator, respectively. The coincidence between the RFP and the PPS was measured to be ≤0.5 mm with microdiamond, ≤0.41 mm with the W2-1 × 1 scintillator, and ≤0.22 mm using the film-technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-volume field detectors, used in conjunction with a clinically available phantom, an electrometer with data-logging, and treatment plans created in clinical mode offer an efficient and viable alternative for film-based profile tests. Position verification can be accurately performed when CBCT-imaging is available to correct for residual detector-position uncertainty. Scans are easily set up within the treatment-planning-system and, when coupled with an automated analysis, can provide accurate measurements within minutes.

Properties of IBA Razor Nano Chamber in small-field radiation therapy using 6 MV FF, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF photon beams

BACKGROUND

Small megavoltage photon fields are increasingly used in modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Therefore, it is important to study the reliability of dosimetry in the small-field conditions. The IBA Razor Nano Chamber (Nano chamber) ionization chamber is particularly intended for small-field measurements. In this work, properties of the Nano chamber were studied with both measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The measurements and MC simulations were performed with 6 MV, 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF photon beams from the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. The source-to-surface distance was fixed at 100 cm. The measurements and MC simulations included profiles, percentage depth doses (PDD), and output factors (OF) in square jaw-collimated fields. The MC simulations were performed with the EGSnrc software system in a large water phantom.

RESULTS

The measured profiles and PDDs obtained with the Nano chamber were compared against IBA Razor Diode, PTW microDiamond and the PTW Semiflex ionization chamber. These results indicate that the Nano chamber is a high-resolution detector and thus suitable for small field profile measurements down to field sizes 2 × 2 cm² and appropriate for the PDD measurements. The field output correction factors kQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr and field OFs ΩQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr were determined according to TRS-483 protocol In the 6 MV FF and FFF beams, the determined correction factors kQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr were within 1.2% for the field sizes of 1 × 1 cm²-3 × 3 cm² and the experimental and MC defined field output factors ΩQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr showed good agreement.

CONCLUSION

The Nano chamber with its small cavity volume is a potential detector for the small-field dosimetry. In this study, the properties of this detector were characterized with measurements and MC simulations. The determined correction factors kQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr are novel results for the NC in the TrueBeam fields.