1
|
Kim D, Collins JD, White JA, Hanneman K, Lee DC, Patel AR, Hu P, Litt H, Weinsaft JW, Davids R, Mukai K, Ng MY, Luetkens JA, Roguin A, Rochitte CE, Woodard PK, Manisty C, Zareba KM, Mont L, Bogun F, Ennis DB, Nazarian S, Webster G, Stojanovska J. SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2024; 26:100995. [PMID: 38219955 PMCID: PMC11211236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kim
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | - James A White
- Departments of Cardiac Sciences and Diagnostic Imaging, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kate Hanneman
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, Toronto General Hospital and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel C Lee
- Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amit R Patel
- Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Peng Hu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Harold Litt
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan W Weinsaft
- Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Davids
- SHS AM NAM USA DI MR COLLAB ADV-APPS, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Chicago, Il, USA
| | - Kanae Mukai
- Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System, Ryan Ranch Center for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, Monterey, CA, USA
| | - Ming-Yen Ng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Julian A Luetkens
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ariel Roguin
- Department of Cardiology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera and Faculty of Medicine. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
| | - Carlos E Rochitte
- Heart Institute, InCor, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Pamela K Woodard
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Charlotte Manisty
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karolina M Zareba
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Lluis Mont
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Frank Bogun
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel B Ennis
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Saman Nazarian
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory Webster
- Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jadranka Stojanovska
- Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhuta S, Patel NJ, Ciricillo JA, Haddad MN, Khokher W, Mhanna M, Patel M, Burmeister C, Malas H, Kammeyer JA. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis in the COVID-19 Era. Curr Probl Cardiol 2022; 48:101396. [PMID: 36126764 PMCID: PMC9481470 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the COVID-19 pandemic, to minimize aerosol-generating procedures, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was utilized at our institution as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for diagnosing infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS This retrospective study evaluated the clinical utility of CMR for detecting IE among 14 patients growing typical microorganisms on blood cultures or meeting modified Duke criteria. RESULTS 7 cases were treated for IE. In 2 cases, CMR results were notable for possible leaflet vegetations and were clinically meaningful in guiding antibiotic therapy, obtaining further imaging, and/or pursuing surgical intervention. In 2 cases, vegetations were missed on CMR but detected on TEE. In 3 cases, CMR was nondiagnostic, but patients were treated empirically. There was no difference in antibiotic duration or outcomes over 1 year. CONCLUSION CMR demonstrated mixed results in diagnosing valvular vegetations and guiding clinical decision making. Further prospective controlled trials of CMR vs TEE are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapan Bhuta
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Neha J Patel
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Jacob A Ciricillo
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Michael N Haddad
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Waleed Khokher
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mohammed Mhanna
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mitra Patel
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | | | - Hazem Malas
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA; ProMedica Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Joel A Kammeyer
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA; ProMedica Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|