Telemedicine-guided remote enrollment of patients into an acute stroke trial

Combined Therapeutics: Future Opportunities for Co-therapy with Thrombectomy

Stroke is an urgent public health issue with millions of patients worldwide living with its devastating effects. The advent of thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy has transformed the hyperacute care of these patients. However, a significant proportion of patients receiving these therapies still goes on to have unfavorable outcomes and many more remain ineligible for these therapies based on our current guidelines. The future of stroke care will depend on an expansion of the scope of thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy to patients outside traditional time windows, more distal occlusions, and large vessel occlusions with mild clinical deficits, for whom clinical trial results have not proven therapeutic efficacy. Novel cytoprotective therapies targeting the ischemic cascade and reperfusion injury therapy, in combination with our existing treatment modalities, should be explored to further improve outcomes for these patients with acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will review the current status of thrombolysis and thrombectomy, suggest additional data that is needed to enhance these therapies, and discuss how cytoprotection might be combined with thrombectomy.

Pharmacological brain cytoprotection in acute ischaemic stroke — renewed hope in the reperfusion era

For over 40 years, attempts to develop treatments that protect neurons and other brain cells against the cellular and biochemical consequences of cerebral ischaemia in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) have been unsuccessful. However, the advent of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy has taken us into a new era of treatment for AIS in which highly effective reperfusion therapy is widely available. In this context, cytoprotective treatments should be revisited as adjunctive treatment to reperfusion therapy. Renewed efforts should focus on developing new drugs that target multiple aspects of the ischaemic cascade, and previously developed drugs should be reconsidered if they produced robust cytoprotective effects in preclinical models and their safety profiles were reasonable in previous clinical trials. Several development pathways for cytoprotection as an adjunct to reperfusion can be envisioned. In this Review, we outline the targets for cytoprotective therapy and discuss considerations for future drug development, highlighting the recent ESCAPE-NA1 trial of nerinetide, which produced the most promising results to date. We review new types of clinical trial to evaluate whether cytoprotective drugs can slow infarct growth prior to reperfusion and/or ameliorate the consequences of reperfusion, such as haemorrhagic transformation. We also highlight how advanced brain imaging can help to identify patients with salvageable ischaemic tissue who are likely to benefit from cytoprotective therapy.

In this Review, Fisher and Savitz consider how the era of reperfusion therapy in ischaemic stroke provides new hope for the development of cytoprotective therapies to further improve outcomes, highlighting how promising recent findings can be built on to benefit patients.

Highly successful reperfusion therapy with intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy is now widely available for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke, making cytoprotective therapy a viable additional treatment approach.

Previous attempts to develop cytoprotective therapy have been unsuccessful, but this approach should now be reconsidered as an adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis and thrombectomy.

New cytoprotective drugs should be developed to target multiple aspects of the ischaemic cascade, and previously developed drugs should be reconsidered.

Trials should be conducted to evaluate the effects of cytoprotective drugs when administered before or after reperfusion therapy or both.

Advanced brain imaging should be used to select patients who are most likely to benefit from cytoprotective treatment for enrolment in new trials.

Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials

Many factors contribute to the poor survival of malignant brain tumor patients, some of which are not easily remedied. However, one contributor to the lack of progress that may be modifiable is poor clinical trial accrual. Surveys of brain tumor patients and neuro-oncology providers suggest that clinicians do a poor job of discussing clinical trials with patients and referring patients for clinical trials. Yet, data from the Cancer Action Network of the American Cancer Society suggest that most eligible oncology patients asked to enroll on a clinical trial will agree to do so. To this end, the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) in collaboration with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, including the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC), and other partners are working together with the intent to double clinical trial accrual over the next 5 years. Here we describe the factors contributing to poor clinical trial accrual in neuro-oncology and offer possible solutions.

Rationale and design of a statewide telestroke registry: Lone Star Stroke Consortium Telestroke Registry (LeSteR)

INTRODUCTION

The Lone Star Stroke Consortium Telestroke Registry (LeSteR) currently consisting of 3 academic hub centres and 27 partner spokes is a statewide initiative organised by leading academic health centres in the State of Texas to understand practice patterns of acute stroke management via telestroke (TS) in Texas, a state with one of the largest rural populations in the USA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All patients who had presumed stroke for whom a TS consultation has been obtained in the network are entered into a web-based, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant database from September 2013 to present. Spokes were enrolled into LeSteR in a staggered approach in two data collection phases: a retrospective phase and a prospective phase. Basic clinical, demographic data and relevant time metrics are collected in the retrospective phase. Starting 1 September 2015, additional outcome data including 90-day modified Rankin score, readmission and 90-day disposition are obtained by a standard phone interview. From the registry initiation to 31 December 2017, there are 8089 patients who had suspected stroke in the registry. Over 60% of patients enrolled after 1 September 2015 have reported outcome data. Enrolment is still active for this registry.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

LeSteR is a statewide TS registry organised by academic health centres that will provide significant insight regarding the impact of TS in the State of Texas. Findings from LeSteR will provide data that can be analysed to improve the allocation of healthcare resources using TS to treat stroke in a state with one of the largest rural populations.

Evaluation of Wearable Digital Devices in a Phase I Clinical Trial

We assessed the performance of two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k)‐cleared wearable digital devices and the operational feasibility of deploying them to augment data collection in a 10‐day residential phase I clinical trial. The Phillips Actiwatch Spectrum Pro (Actiwatch) was used to assess mobility and sleep, and the Vitalconnect HealthPatch MD (HealthPatch) was used for monitoring heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and surface skin temperature (ST). We measured data collection rates, compared device readouts with anticipated readings and conventional in‐clinic measures, investigated data limitations, and assessed user acceptability. Six of nine study participants consented; completeness of data collection was adequate (> 90% for four of six subjects). A good correlation was observed between the HealthPatch device derived and in‐clinic measures for HR (Pearson r = 0.71; P = 2.2e‐16) but this was poor for RR (r = 0.08; P = 0.44) and ST (r = 0.14; P = 0.14). Manual review of electrocardiogram strips recorded during reported episodes of tachycardia > 180 beats/min showed that these were artefacts. The HealthPatch was judged to be not fit‐for‐purpose because of artefacts and the need for time‐consuming manual review. The Actiwatch device was suitable for monitoring mobility, collecting derived sleep data, and facilitating the interpretation of vital sign data. These results suggest the need for fit‐for‐purpose evaluation of wearable devices prior to their deployment in drug development studies.

Telemedicine Provides Noninferior Research Informed Consent for Remote Study Enrollment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine networks are beginning to provide an avenue for conducting emergency medicine research, but using telemedicine to recruit participants for clinical trials has not been validated. The goal of this consent study was to determine whether patient comprehension of telemedicine-enabled research informed consent is noninferior to standard face-to-face (F2F) research informed consent.

METHODS

A prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial was performed in a 60,000-visit Midwestern academic emergency department (ED) to test whether telemedicine-enabled research informed consent provided noninferior comprehension compared with standard consent. This study was conducted as part of a parent clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of 0.12% oral chlorhexidine gluconate in preventing hospital-acquired pneumonia among adult ED patients with expected hospital admission. Prior to being recruited into the study, potential participants were randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio to consent by telemedicine versus standard F2F consent. Telemedicine connectivity was provided using a commercially available interface (REACH platform, Vidyo Inc.) to an emergency physician located in another part of the ED. Comprehension of research consent (primary outcome) was measured using the modified quality of informed consent (QuIC) instrument, a validated tool for measuring research informed consent comprehension. Parent trial accrual rate and qualitative survey data were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were randomized (n = 64, telemedicine), and 101 QuIC surveys were completed. Comprehension of research informed consent using telemedicine was not inferior to F2F consent (QuIC scores 74.4 ± 8.1 vs. 74.4 ± 6.9 on a 100-point scale, p = 0.999). Subjective understanding of consent (p = 0.194) and parent trial study accrual rates (56% vs. 69%, p = 0.142) were similar.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine is noninferior to F2F consent for delivering research informed consent, with no detected differences in comprehension and patient-reported understanding. This consent study will inform design of future telemedicine-enabled clinical trials.

Resource Utilization for Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Transferred to a Comprehensive Stroke Center

BACKGROUND

As a comprehensive stroke center (CSC), we accept transfer patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in our region. CSC guidelines mandate receipt of patients with ICH for higher level of care. We determined resource utilization of patients accepted from outside hospitals compared with patients directly arriving to our center.

METHODS

From our stroke registry, we compared patients with primary ICH transferred to those directly arriving to our CSC from March 2011-March 2012. We compared the proportion of patients who utilized at least one of these resources: neurointensive care unit (NICU), neurosurgical intervention, or clinical trial enrollment.

RESULTS

Among the 362 patients, 210 (58%) were transfers. Transferred patients were older, had higher median Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores than directly admitted patients. Transfers had smaller median ICH volumes (20.5 cc versus 15.2 cc; P = .04) and lower ICH scores (2.1 ± 1.4 versus 1.6 ± 1.3; P < .01). A smaller proportion of transfers utilized CSC-specific resources compared with direct admits (P = .02). Fewer transferred patients required neurosurgical intervention or were enrolled in trials. No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients who used NICU resources, although transferred patients had a significantly lower length of stay in the NICU. Average hospital stay costs were less for transferred patients than for direct admits.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ICH transferred to our CSC underwent fewer neurosurgical procedures and had a shorter stay in the NICU. These results were reflected in the lower per-patient costs in the transferred group. Our results raise the need to analyze cost-benefits and resource utilization of transferring patients with milder ICH.