Clinical and laboratory features distinguishing juvenile polymyositis and muscular dystrophy

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myositis: an update on pathophysiology and clinical care

The childhood-onset or juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIMs) are a heterogenous group of rare and serious autoimmune diseases of children and young people that predominantly affect the muscles and skin but can also involve other organs, including the lungs, gut, joints, heart and central nervous system. Different myositis-specific autoantibodies have been identified that are associated with different muscle biopsy features, as well as with different clinical characteristics, prognoses and treatment responses. Thus, myositis-specific autoantibodies can be used to subset JIIMs into sub-phenotypes; some of these sub-phenotypes parallel disease seen in adults, whereas others are distinct from adult-onset idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Although treatments and management have much improved over the past decade, evidence is still lacking for many of the current treatments and few validated prognostic biomarkers are available with which to predict response to treatment, comorbidities (such as calcinosis) or outcome. Emerging data on the pathogenesis of the JIIMs are leading to proposals for new trials and tools for monitoring disease.

Assessment of Thigh MRI Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics for Assisting in Discrimination of Juvenile Dermatomyositis

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important non-invasive examination in the early diagnosis of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of radiomics to establish a quantitative analysis of MRI images. Radiomics and machine learning were used to retrospectively analyze MRI T2 fat suppression sequences and relevant clinical data. The model associated with radiomics features was established using a cohort of patients who underwent thigh MRI at the children's hospital from June 2014 to September 2021. In total, 75 patients with JDM and 75 control children were included in the training cohort (n = 102) and validation cohort (n = 48). The independent factors including lower muscle strength (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.90), higher creatine kinase (CK) level (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.20-2.38), and higher radiomics score (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.63-3.62) were associated with a clinical diagnosis of JDM. The combined model achieved good discrimination performance compared the radiomics score model under linear discriminant analyses in the training cohort (AUC, 0.949; 95% CI, 0.912-0.986 vs. AUC, 0.912; 95% CI, 0.858-0.967; p = 0.02) and in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.878-1 vs. AUC, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.812-0.998; p = 0.03). The combined model showed the diagnostic value was not weaker than the biopsy (AUC, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.919-0.981, n = 150 vs. AUC, 0.952; 95% CI, 0.889-1, n = 72; p = 0.95) and electromyogram (EMG) (AUC, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.919-0.981 vs. AUC, 0.900; 95% CI, 0.852-0.948; p = 0.10) among all the patients. The combination of radiomics features extracted from the MRI and non-invasive clinical characteristics obtained a pronounced discriminative performance to assist in discriminating JDM.

Is it really myositis? Mimics and pitfalls

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous set of systemic inflammatory disorders primarily affecting muscle. Signs and symptoms vary greatly between and within subtypes, requiring supportive laboratory and pathologic evidence to confirm the diagnosis. Several studies are typical assessments for patients with suspected inflammatory myopathy, including muscle enzymes, autoimmune markers, imaging, and muscle biopsy. Misdiagnoses of myositis are not only related to the overlap of clinical phenotype with non-inflammatory myopathies, but also due to the limitations of diagnostic tests employed. Since many of the investigative tests are non-specific, they share features with other disorders, including muscular dystrophies, endocrine, toxic, and metabolic myopathies, and other neuromuscular or rheumatologic conditions. Recognizing the limitations of tests and understanding the shared features between inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies can help prevent misdiagnosing myositis with one of its several mimics.

The Diagnostic Value of MR IVIM and T2 Mapping in Differentiating Autoimmune Myositis From Muscular Dystrophy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To confirm the feasibility and compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and T2 mapping models for the differentiation of autoimmune myositis from muscular dystrophy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourty-two autoimmune myositis and 11 muscular dystrophy patients proven by diagnostic criteria were enrolled in the study. Conventional MR sequences, IVIM, and T2 mapping through the bilateral thighs were obtained as well as blood samples for all patients. IVIM and T2 mapping parameters as well as serum markers were compared between the autoimmune myositis and muscular dystrophy groups. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for statistical analysis along with receiver operating characteristic curves. Spearman correlation coefficient models were constructed to analyze the correlation between IVIM and T2 mapping with serological parameters.

RESULTS

The intramuscular apparent diffusion coefficient, tissue diffusivity (D), perfusion fraction (f_p), and T2 relaxation time values were statistically significantly different between the autoimmune myositis and muscular dystrophy groups (p < 0.05). Pseudo diffusivity (D_p) values showed no statistical difference between the groups (p > 0.05). D parameter of IVIM sequences differentiated autoimmune and muscular dystrophy with a higher specificity of 75.60%. T2 values within the thighs were correlated with serum creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase levels (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Thigh muscle IVIM and T2 mapping parameters are useful in differentiating autoimmune myositis from muscular dystrophy, particularly the IVIM parameters.

The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathogenesis, clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, and outcomes

The aim of this review was to summarize recent advances in the understanding of the clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, their associated outcomes and the pathogenesis of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIMs). The major clinical and autoantibody phenotypes in children have many features similar to those in adults, and each has distinct demographic and clinical features and associated outcomes. The most common myositis autoantibodies in JIIM patients are anti-p155/140, anti-MJ and anti-MDA5. Higher mortality has been associated with overlap myositis as well as with the presence of anti-synthetase and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies; a chronic illness course and lipodystrophy have been associated with anti-p155/140 autoantibodies; and calcinosis has been associated with anti-MJ autoantibodies. Histologic abnormalities of JIIMs detectable on muscle biopsy have also been correlated with myositis-specific autoantibodies; for example, patients with anti-MDA5 show low levels of inflammatory infiltrate and muscle damage on biopsy. The first genome-wide association study of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis revealed three novel genetic associations, BLK, PLCL1 and CCL21 and confirmed that the human leucocyte antigen region is the primary risk region for juvenile dermatomyositis. Here, we review the well-established pathogenic processes in JIIMs, including the type 1 interferon and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways. Several novel JIIM-associated inflammatory mediators, such as the innate immune system proteins, myeloid-related peptide 8/14, galectin 9 and eotaxin, have emerged as promising biomarkers of disease. Advances in our understanding of the phenotypes and pathophysiology of the JIIMs are leading to better tools to help clinicians stratify and treat these heterogeneous disorders.

Myositis mimics: how to recognize them

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To help clinicians to distinguish between myositis (and other immune-mediated and immunosuppressant-responsive disorders) and its many clinical mimics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing experience has shown that findings from conventional investigations, such as muscle biopsy, can be misleading. More specialist investigations, notably autoantibody screening, immunocytochemical techniques, and evolving DNA technologies, are powerful tools but experience is currently largely limited to specialist centres - and even these techniques are open to misinterpretation.

SUMMARY

Misdiagnosis is hazardous to the patient. Treatable conditions may be missed, or patients subjected inappropriately to potentially toxic drug treatments. Judicious use of clinical skills alone should help reduce these risks.

Myositis registries and biorepositories: powerful tools to advance clinical, epidemiologic and pathogenic research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical registries and biorepositories have proven extremely useful in many studies of diseases, especially rare diseases. Given their rarity and diversity, the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or myositis syndromes, have benefited from individual researchers' collections of cohorts of patients. Major efforts are being made to establish large registries and biorepositories that will allow many additional studies to be performed that were not possible before. Here, we describe the registries developed by investigators and patient support groups that are currently available for collaborative research purposes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We have identified 46 myositis research registries, including many with biorepositories, which have been developed for a wide variety of purposes and have resulted in great advances in understanding the range of phenotypes, clinical presentations, risk factors, pathogenic mechanisms, outcome assessment, therapeutic responses, and prognoses. These are now available for collaborative use to undertake additional studies. Two myositis patient registries have been developed for research, and myositis patient support groups maintain demographic registries with large numbers of patients available to be contacted for potential research participation.

SUMMARY

Investigator-initiated myositis research registries and biorepositories have proven extremely useful in understanding many aspects of these rare and diverse autoimmune diseases. These registries and biorepositories, in addition to those developed by myositis patient support groups, deserve continued support to maintain the momentum in this field as they offer major opportunities to improve understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of these diseases in cost-effective ways.

Developments in the classification and treatment of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

This review updates recent trends in the classification of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIM) and the emerging standard of treatment of the most common form of JIIM, juvenile dermatomyositis. The JIIM are rare, heterogeneous autoimmune diseases that share chronic muscle inflammation and weakness. A growing spectrum of clinicopathologic groups and serologic phenotypes defined by the presence of myositis autoantibodies are now recognized, each with differing demographics, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and prognoses. Although daily oral corticosteroids remain the backbone of treatment, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are almost always used adjunctively and biologic therapies may benefit patients with recalcitrant disease.