Engineering Neural Tissue from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Novel Small Molecule Releasing Microspheres

3D bioprinting patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell models of Alzheimer's disease using a smart bioink

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is becoming increasingly prevalent as our population ages. It is characterized by the buildup of amyloid beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated-tau. The current treatments for AD do not prevent the long-term progression of the disease and pre-clinical models often do not accurately represent its complexity. Bioprinting combines cells and biomaterials to create 3D structures that replicate the native tissue environment and can be used as a tool in disease modeling or drug screening.

METHODS

This work differentiated both healthy and diseased patient-derived human induced pluripotent stems cells (hiPSCs) into neural progenitor cells (NPCs) that were bioprinted using the Aspect RX1 microfluidic printer into dome-shaped constructs. The combination of cells, bioink, and puromorphamine (puro)-releasing microspheres were used to mimic the in vivo environment and direct the differentiation of the NPCs into basal forebrain-resembling cholinergic neurons (BFCN). These tissue models were then characterized for cell viability, immunocytochemistry, and electrophysiology to evaluate their functionality and physiology for use as disease-specific neural models.

RESULTS

Tissue models were successfully bioprinted and the cells were viable for analysis after 30- and 45-day cultures. The neuronal and cholinergic markers β-tubulin III (Tuj1), forkhead box G1 (FOXG1), and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) were identified as well as the AD markers amyloid beta and tau. Further, immature electrical activity was observed when the cells were excited with potassium chloride and acetylcholine.

CONCLUSIONS

This work shows the successful development of bioprinted tissue models incorporating patient derived hiPSCs. Such models can potentially be used as a tool to screen promising drug candidates for treating AD. Further, this model could be used to increase the understanding of AD progression. The use of patient derived cells also shows the potential of this model for use in personalized medicine applications.

Biomaterial-based strategies for in vitro neural models

In vitro models have been used as a complementary tool to animal studies in understanding the nervous system's physiological mechanisms and pathological disorders, while also serving as platforms to evaluate the safety and efficiency of therapeutic candidates. Following recent advances in materials science, micro- and nanofabrication techniques and cell culture systems, in vitro technologies have been rapidly gaining the potential to bridge the gap between animal and clinical studies by providing more sophisticated models that recapitulate key aspects of the structure, biochemistry, biomechanics, and functions of human tissues. This was made possible, in large part, by the development of biomaterials that provide cells with physicochemical features that closely mimic the cellular microenvironment of native tissues. Due to the well-known material-driven cellular response and the importance of mimicking the environment of the target tissue, the selection of optimal biomaterials represents an important early step in the design of biomimetic systems to investigate brain structures and functions. This review provides a comprehensive compendium of commonly used biomaterials as well as the different fabrication techniques employed for the design of neural tissue models. Furthermore, the authors discuss the main parameters that need to be considered to develop functional platforms not only for the study of brain physiological functions and pathological processes but also for drug discovery/development and the optimization of biomaterials for neural tissue engineering.

Drug-releasing Microspheres for Stem Cell Differentiation

The ability of stem cells to differentiate into specialized cells make them a valuable tool for therapeutic applications. 3D bioprinting, a subset of additive manufacturing, uses bioinks composed of cells and biomaterials to create living tissues. The use of bioactive factors like small molecules and proteins can promote stem cell differentiation into the desired cell phenotypes for tissue regeneration. Small molecules can accelerate the process of regeneration in tissue engineering, maintain bioactivity in a biological environment, and minimize the costs associated with this process. Additionally, they can be encapsulated in specialized drug-delivery devices called microspheres for controlled release. Microspheres are small (1-1000 μm) spherical particles usually made from biodegradable and biocompatible polymers that can be loaded with drugs and other bioactive components. They can then be integrated into stem-cell-laden bioinks used to form bioprinted tissues, where they will release the encapsulated drug and promote differentiation of stem cells into the desired mature cell type. Microspheres can be widely used to encapsulate a broad range of therapeutic agents, including hydrophilic and hydrophobic small molecule drugs, DNA, and proteins. The release of encapsulated molecules occurs through degradation and erosion of the polymer matrix. This article provides detailed protocols for fabricating and sterilizing drug-releasing microspheres made from poly-ε-caprolactone, a promising biodegradable polymer often used for controlled drug delivery due to its biocompatibility and biodegradation kinetics. Additional protocols describe characterization of the loading and size of microspheres as well as incorporation of microspheres into a fibrin-based bioink for 3D bioprinting. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Fabrication of drug-releasing PCL microspheres Support Protocol 1: Preparation of microspheres for determination of encapsulation efficiency by HPLC Support Protocol 2: Preparation of microspheres for SEM analysis Basic Protocol 2: Incorporation of microspheres into fibrin-based bioink.

3D Bioprinting Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Neural Tissues Using a Fibrin-Based Bioink

Current treatments for neurodegenerative diseases aim to alleviate the symptoms experienced by patients; however, these treatments do not cure the disease nor prevent further degeneration. Improvements in current disease-modeling and drug-development practices could accelerate effective treatments for neurological diseases. To that end, 3D bioprinting has gained significant attention for engineering tissues in a rapid and reproducible fashion. Additionally, using patient-derived stem cells, which can be reprogrammed to neural-like cells, could generate personalized neural tissues. Here, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were bioprinted using a fibrin-based bioink and the microfluidic RX1 bioprinter. These tissues were cultured for 12 days in the presence of SB431542 (SB), LDN-193189 (LDN), purmorphamine (puro), fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8), fibroblast growth factor-basic (bFGF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to induce differentiation to dopaminergic neurons (DN). The constructs were analyzed for expression of neural markers, dopamine release, and electrophysiological activity. The cells expressed DN-specific and early neuronal markers (tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and class III beta-tubulin (TUJ1), respectively) after 12 days of differentiation. Additionally, the tissues exhibited immature electrical signaling after treatment with potassium chloride (KCl). Overall, this work shows the potential of bioprinting engineered neural tissues from patient-derived MSCs, which could serve as an important tool for personalized disease models and drug-screening.

Natural Biomaterials and Their Use as Bioinks for Printing Tissues

The most prevalent form of bioprinting-extrusion bioprinting-can generate structures from a diverse range of materials and viscosities. It can create personalized tissues that aid in drug testing and cancer research when used in combination with natural bioinks. This paper reviews natural bioinks and their properties and functions in hard and soft tissue engineering applications. It discusses agarose, alginate, cellulose, chitosan, collagen, decellularized extracellular matrix, dextran, fibrin, gelatin, gellan gum, hyaluronic acid, Matrigel, and silk. Multi-component bioinks are considered as a way to address the shortfalls of individual biomaterials. The mechanical, rheological, and cross-linking properties along with the cytocompatibility, cell viability, and printability of the bioinks are detailed as well. Future avenues for research into natural bioinks are then presented.

Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues

Fibrin gel has been widely used for engineering various types of tissues due to its biocompatible nature, biodegradability, and tunable mechanical and nanofibrous structural properties. Despite their promising regenerative capacity and extensive biocompatibility with various tissue types, fibrin-based biomaterials are often notoriously known as burdensome candidates for 3D biofabrication and bioprinting. The high viscosity of fibrin (crosslinked form) hinders proper ink extrusion, and its pre-polymer form, fibrinogen, is not capable of maintaining shape fidelity. To overcome these limitations and empower fibrinogen-based bioinks for fibrin biomimetics and regenerative applications, different strategies can be practiced. The aim of this review is to report the strategies that bring fabrication compatibility to these bioinks through mixing fibrinogen with printable biomaterials, using supporting bath supplemented with crosslinking agents, and crosslinking fibrin in situ. Moreover, the review discusses some of the recent advances in 3D bioprinting of biomimetic soft and hard tissues using fibrinogen-based bioinks, and highlights the impacts of these strategies on fibrin properties, its bioactivity, and the functionality of the consequent biomimetic tissue. Statement of Significance Due to its biocompatible nature, biodegradability, and tunable mechanical and nanofibrous structural properties, fibrin gel has been widely employed in tissue engineering and more recently, used as in 3D bioprinting. The fibrinogen's poor printable properties make it difficult to maintain the 3D shape of bioprinted constructs. Our work describes the strategies employed in tissue engineering to allow the 3D bioprinting of fibrinogen-based bioinks, such as the combination of fibrinogen with printable biomaterials, the in situ fibrin crosslinking, and the use of supporting bath supplemented with crosslinking agents. Further, this review discuss the application of 3D bioprinting technology to biofabricate fibrin-based soft and hard tissues for biomedical applications, and discuss current limitations and future of such in vitro models.

Tooth Formation: Are the Hardest Tissues of Human Body Hard to Regenerate?

With increasing life expectancy, demands for dental tissue and whole-tooth regeneration are becoming more significant. Despite great progress in medicine, including regenerative therapies, the complex structure of dental tissues introduces several challenges to the field of regenerative dentistry. Interdisciplinary efforts from cellular biologists, material scientists, and clinical odontologists are being made to establish strategies and find the solutions for dental tissue regeneration and/or whole-tooth regeneration. In recent years, many significant discoveries were done regarding signaling pathways and factors shaping calcified tissue genesis, including those of tooth. Novel biocompatible scaffolds and polymer-based drug release systems are under development and may soon result in clinically applicable biomaterials with the potential to modulate signaling cascades involved in dental tissue genesis and regeneration. Approaches for whole-tooth regeneration utilizing adult stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, or tooth germ cells transplantation are emerging as promising alternatives to overcome existing in vitro tissue generation hurdles. In this interdisciplinary review, most recent advances in cellular signaling guiding dental tissue genesis, novel functionalized scaffolds and drug release material, various odontogenic cell sources, and methods for tooth regeneration are discussed thus providing a multi-faceted, up-to-date, and illustrative overview on the tooth regeneration matter, alongside hints for future directions in the challenging field of regenerative dentistry.

3D Bioprinting Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neural Tissues Using a Novel Fibrin Bioink Containing Drug Releasing Microspheres

3D bioprinting combines cells with a supportive bioink to fabricate multiscale, multi-cellular structures that imitate native tissues. Here, we demonstrate how our novel fibrin-based bioink formulation combined with drug releasing microspheres can serve as a tool for bioprinting tissues using human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Microspheres, small spherical particles that generate controlled drug release, promote hiPSC differentiation into dopaminergic neurons when used to deliver small molecules like guggulsterone. We used the microfluidics based RX1 bioprinter to generate domes with a 1 cm diameter consisting of our novel fibrin-based bioink containing guggulsterone microspheres and hiPSC-derived NPCs. The resulting tissues exhibited over 90% cellular viability 1 day post printing that then increased to 95% 7 days post printing. The bioprinted tissues expressed the early neuronal marker, TUJ1 and the early midbrain marker, Forkhead Box A2 (FOXA2) after 15 days of culture. These bioprinted neural tissues expressed TUJ1 (15 ± 1.3%), the dopamine marker, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (8 ± 1%) and other glial markers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (15 ± 4%) and oligodendrocyte progenitor marker (O4) (4 ± 1%) after 30 days. Also, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis showed these bioprinted tissues expressed TUJ1, NURR1 (gene expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons), LMX1B, TH, and PAX6 after 30 days. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that using a microsphere-laden bioink to bioprint hiPSC-derived NPCs can promote the differentiation of neural tissue.

3D Bioprinting Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Tissues Using a Novel Lab-on-a-Printer Technology

Most neurological diseases and disorders lack true cures, including spinal cord injury (SCI). Accordingly, current treatments only alleviate the symptoms of these neurological diseases and disorders. Engineered neural tissues derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can serve as powerful tools to identify drug targets for treating such diseases and disorders. In this work, we demonstrate how hiPSC-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) can be bioprinted into defined structures using Aspect Biosystems’ novel RX1 bioprinter in combination with our unique fibrin-based bioink in rapid fashion as it takes under 5 min to print four tissues. This printing process preserves high levels of cell viability (>81%) and their differentiation capacity in comparison to less sophisticated bioprinting methods. These bioprinted neural tissues expressed the neuronal marker, βT-III (45 ± 20.9%), after 15 days of culture and markers associated with spinal cord (SC) motor neurons (MNs), such as Olig2 (68.8 ± 6.9%), and HB9 (99.6 ± 0.4%) as indicated by flow cytometry. The bioprinted neural tissues expressed the mature MN marker, ChaT, after 30 days of culture as indicated by immunocytochemistry. In conclusion, we have presented a novel method for high throughput production of mature hiPSC-derived neural tissues with defined structures that resemble those found in the SC.