Precautions for avoiding pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy

Effect on post-operative pulmonary complications frequency of high flow nasal oxygen versus standard oxygen therapy in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial-OSSIGENA study

Background

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a challenge after esophagectomy. Despite improvement in surgical and anesthesiological management, PPCs are reported in as many as 40% of patients. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether early application of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) after extubation will provide benefit in terms of reduced PPC frequency compared to standard oxygen therapy.

Methods

Patients aged 18-85 years undergoing esophagectomy for cancer treatment with radical intent, excluding those with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3 and severe systemic comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease) will be randomized at the end of surgery to receive HFNC or standard oxygen therapy (Venturi mask or nasal goggles) after early extubation (within 12 hours after the end of surgery) for 48 hours. The main postoperative goals are to obtain SpO2 ≥94% and adequate pain control. Oxygen therapy after 48 hours will be stopped unless the physician deems it necessary. In case of respiratory clinical worsening, patients will be supported with the most appropriate tool (noninvasive ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation). Pulmonary [pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), tracheo-bronchial injury, air leak, reintubation, and/or respiratory failure] complications will be recorded as main outcome. Secondary outcomes, including cardiovascular, surgical, renal and infective complications will also be recorded. The primary analysis will be carried out on 320 patients (160 per group) and performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, including all participants randomized into the treatment groups, regardless of protocol adherence. The primary outcome, the PPC rate, will be compared between the two treatment groups using a chi-square test for categorical data, or Fisher's exact test will be used if the assumptions for the chi-square test are not met.

Discussion

Recent evidence demonstrated that early application of HFNC improved the respiratory rate oxygenation index (ROX index) after esophagectomy but did not reduce PPCs. This randomized controlled multicenter trial aims to assess the potential effect of the application of HFNC versus standard oxygen over PPCs in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Trial Registration

This study is registered at clinicaltrial.gov NCT05718284, dated 30 January 2023.

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: Comparing the combined effects of smoking burden and operative approach on outcomes in esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the interaction between smoking status and operative approach following esophagectomy on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2022, were identified from the STS-GTSD database and divided into 6 groups based on smoking status-never (NS), former (FS), or current (CS)-and surgical approach-minimally invasive (MIE) or open (OpenE). Primary outcomes were respiratory complications, operative mortality, major morbidity, and composite major morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The final study population comprised 27,373 patients (28.3% NS, 68.0% FS, and 13.7% CS) from 295 hospitals. Most cases were OpenE (58.1%), but the proportion of MIE increased from 19.2% in 2009 to 56.3% in 2022. Multivariable analysis showed that (1) risk-adjusted operative mortality was decreased only in never-smokers who underwent MIE (MIE-NS: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.82), and; (2) there were no significant differences in mortality among the groups compared to the reference OpenE-NS group. Respiratory complications, major morbidity, and composite mortality and morbidity outcomes showed similar smoking and surgical approach effects. All outcomes were worse in smokers irrespective of approach, and within the same smoking status group, AORs for respiratory complications and morbidity were slightly lower in MIE versus OpenE, but these differences were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory complications and other major morbidity outcomes following esophagectomy are substantially worsened by smoking history, particularly in current smokers. Among NS, MIE is associated with reduced operative mortality.

Multimodal prehabilitation and postoperative outcomes in upper abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative complications in upper abdominal surgeries is understudied. This review analyzes randomized trials on multimodal prehabilitation with patient and hospital outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for trials on prehabilitation before elective (non-emergency) abdominal surgery. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and all-cause complications; secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care length of stay. A meta-analysis with random-effect models was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated with I-square and Cochran's Q test. Dichotomous variables were reported in log-odds ratio and continuous variables were presented as mean difference. Ten studies (total 1503 patients) were included. Odds of developing complications after prehabilitation were significantly lower compared to various control groups (- 0.38 [- 0.75- - 0.004], P = 0.048). Five studies described PPCs, and participants with prehabilitation had decreased odds of PPC (- 0.96 [- 1.38- - 0.54], P < 0.001). Prehabilitation did not significantly reduce length of stay, unless exercise was implemented; with exercise, hospital stay decreased significantly (- 0.91 [- 1.67- - 0.14], P = 0.02). Multimodal prehabilitation may decrease complications in upper abdominal surgery, but not necessarily length of stay; research should address heterogeneity in the literature.

Management of Major Complications After Esophagectomy

Esophagectomy remains a procedure with one of the highest complication rates. Given the advances in medical and surgical management of patients and increased patient survival, the number of complications reported has increased. There are different grading systems for complications which vary based on severity or organ system, with the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group unifying them. Management involves conservative intervention and dietary modification to endoscopic interventions and surgical reintervention. Treatment is etiology specific but rehabilitation and patient optimization play a significant role in managing these complications by preventing them. Management is a step-up approach depending on the severity of symptoms.

Preventing Pneumonia in High-risk Patients After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Mini-tracheostomy and Tazobactam/Piperacillin

BACKGROUND/AIM

We evaluated the usefulness of prophylactic mini-tracheostomy (PMT) and perioperative administration of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) in high-risk patients after esophagectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 89 consecutive high-risk patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2013 and December 2021. We defined patients with two or more of the following factors as high risk: age ≥70 years, performance status ≥1, respiratory dysfunction, liver dysfunction, cardiac dysfunction, renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, albumin <3.5 g/dl, and Brinkman index >600. Standard management was administered to the first 50 patients (standard group). PMT and TAZ/PIPC were administered to the next 39 patients (combination group). Patient characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

Before propensity-score matching, 24-hour urine creatinine clearance, retrosternal route, 3-field lymph node dissection, and open abdominal approach were more common, postoperative pneumonia (13% vs. 36%, p=0.045) and complications of grade ≥3b (2.6% vs. 22%, p=0.01) were less frequent, and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (median: 23 vs. 28 days, p=0.022) in the combination group than in the standard group. In propensity-score matching, patient characteristics, except for 24-h creatinine clearance and reconstructive route, were matched for 23 paired patients. Postoperative pneumonia (8.7% vs. 39%, p=0.035) and complications of grade ≥3b (0% vs. 26%, p=0.022) were less frequent and postoperative hospital stay was shorter (median: 22 vs. 25 days, p=0.021) in the combination group than in the standard group.

CONCLUSION

PMT with TAZ/PIPC can potentially prevent postoperative pneumonia in high-risk patients after esophagectomy.

Impact of pulmonary complications following esophagectomy on long-term survival: multivariate meta-analysis and restricted mean survival time assessment

Pulmonary complications (PC) are common after esophagectomy and their impact on long-term survival is not defined yet. The present study aimed to assess the effect of postoperative PCs on long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer. Systematic review of the literature through February 1, 2023, was performed. The included studies evaluated the effect of PC on long-term survival. Primary outcome was long-term overall survival (OS). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were secondary outcomes. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. Eleven studies were included (3423 patients). Overall, 674 (19.7%) patients developed PC. The RMSTD analysis shows that at 60-month follow-up, patients not experiencing PC live an average of 8.5 (95% CI 6.2-10.8; p < 0.001) months longer compared with those with PC. Similarly, patients not experiencing postoperative PC seem to have significantly longer CSS (8 months; 95% CI 3.7-12.3; p < 0.001) and DFS (5.4 months; 95% CI 1.6-9.1; p = 0.005). The time-dependent HRs analysis shows a reduced mortality hazard in patients without PC at 12 (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.51-0.69), 24 (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.73), 36 (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.79), and 60 months (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.89). This study suggests a moderate clinical impact of PC on long-term OS, CSS, and DFS after esophagectomy. Patients not experiencing PC seem to have a significantly reduced mortality hazard up to 5 years of follow-up.

Asian Americans have higher 30-day surgical complications after esophagectomy: A propensity-score matched study from ACS-NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Despite Asian Americans having a heightened risk profile for esophageal cancer, racial disparities within this group have not been investigated. This study seeks to evaluate the 30-day postoperative outcomes for Asian Americans following esophagectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using ACS-NSQIP esophagectomy targeted database 2016-2021. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was applied to Asian Americans and Caucasians who underwent esophagectomy to compare their 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 229 Asian Americans and 5303 Caucasians identified. Asian Americans were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma. After matching, 687 Caucasians were included. Asian Americans had higher pulmonary complications (22.27 ​% vs 16.01 ​%, p ​= ​0.04) especially pneumonia (16.59 ​% vs 11.06 ​%, p ​= ​0.04), renal dysfunction (2.62 ​% vs 0.44 ​%, p ​= ​0.01) especially progressive renal insufficiency (1.31 ​% vs 0.15 ​%, p ​< ​0.05), and bleeding events (18.34 ​% vs 9.02 ​%, p ​< ​0.01). In addition, Asian Americans had longer LOS (11.83 ​± ​9.39 vs 10.23 ​± ​7.34 days, p ​= ​0.03).

CONCLUSION

Asian Americans were found to face higher 30-day surgical complications following esophagectomy. Continued investigation into the underlying causes and potential mitigation strategies for these disparities are needed.

Laparoscopic versus open abdominal lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open abdominal lymph node dissection using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 459 patients who underwent curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between May, 2005 and December, 2019, at our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: the Laparoscopic (Lap group) and the Open (Open group). Post-PSM, 139 patients from each group were selected for the analysis to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

The Lap group experienced fewer Clavien-Dindo (CD) Grade ≥ 2 complications (28.1% vs. 40.3%, P = 0.04) and lower rates of abdominal surgical site infections (SSI) (2.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.02) than the Open group. The number of lymph nodes harvested was similar in the Lap and Open groups (14.8 ± 7.5 vs. 15.7 ± 8.6, P = 0.34). There was no significant difference in 3-year overall survival rates (81.2% vs. 69.5%, P = 0.12) or relapse-free survival rates (61.1% vs. 58.2%, P = 0.54) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic abdominal lymph node dissection for ESCC can be performed safely and appears to be beneficial.

Prognostic Factors for Recovery from Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy After Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy is a serious complication of esophagectomy that affects the patient's phonation and the ability to prevent life-threatening aspiration events. The aim of this single-center, retrospective study was to investigate the clinical course of left RLN palsy and to identify the main prognostic factors for recovery.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 85 patients who had developed left RLN palsy after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Vocal cord function was assessed in all participants through laryngoscopic examinations, both in the immediate postoperative period and during follow-up. Permanent palsy was defined as no evidence of recovery after 6 months. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied to evaluate the associations between different variables and the outcome of palsy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (25.8%) patients successfully recovered from left RLN palsy. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, active smoking (odds ratio [OR] 0.335, p = 0.038) and the use of thoracoscopic surgery (vs. robotic surgery; OR 0.264, p = 0.028) were identified as independent unfavorable predictors for recovery from palsy. The estimated rates of recovery derived from a logistic regression model for patients harboring two, one, or no risk factors were 13.16%, 31.15-34.75%, and 61.39%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Only one-quarter of patients who had developed left RLN palsy after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy were able to fully recover. Smoking habits and the surgical approach were identified as key determinants of recovery. Patients harboring adverse prognostic factors are potential candidates for early intervention strategies.

Evaluation of indocyanine green tracheobronchial fluorescence (ICG-TBF) via nebulization during minimally invasive esophagectomy

Surgical manipulation of the tracheobronchial complex is a contributing factor in pulmonary morbidity of esophagectomy. Accurate dissection between membranous trachea and bronchi with esophagus is essential. This study tests the feasibility of delivering indocyanine green (ICG) in an aerosol form to achieve tracheobronchial fluorescence (ICG-TBF). Patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction carcinoma (N = 37) undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (McKeown type) were included. ICG was aerosolized by nebulization in supine position before thoracoscopy. ICG-TBF was observed with real-time fluorescence-enabled camera. Intra- and postoperative complications related to ICG were the primary focus. ICG-TBF was identified in 94.6% (35/37) of patients with median time to fluorescence identification of 15 minutes (range 1-43). There were no airway injuries in the study. The ICU median stay was 2 (range 2-21) days. No intra- or postoperative complications attributable to ICG were observed. Grade 3 or 4 pulmonary complications were seen in total 8.1% patients. No 90-day postoperative mortality was seen. ICG delivered in aerosol form was found to be safe and effective in achieving ICG-TBF. It aided in accurate dissection of esophagus from the tracheobronchial complex. Further studies on effect of ICG-TBF in decreasing pulmonary complications of esophagectomy are needed.

Relationship between the severity of emphysematous change in the lung and morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A retrospective study on a novel strategy for risk prediction

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevalence increases post-esophagectomy morbidity. However, the association between COPD severity and post-esophagectomy morbidity remains unclear because of the lack of an objective method to classify COPD severity. Low attenuation volume ratio (LAVR) estimated using Ziostation2 may reflect the extent of emphysematous changes in the lungs and COPD severity, thereby predicting post-esophagectomy morbidity.

METHODS

A total of 776 patients who underwent curative McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2005 and June 2021 were included. The patients were divided into high and low preoperative LAVR groups. Short-term outcomes between the groups were compared for patients who underwent open esophagectomy (OE) and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

RESULTS

A total of 219 (28%) patients were classified into the high LAVR group. High LAVR was significantly associated with disadvantageous patient characteristics such as advanced age, heavy smoking, and impaired respiratory function. Patients with high LAVR had a significantly higher incidence of severe morbidity and pneumonia after OE. High LAVR was an independent risk factor for severe morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.237-5.143; p = 0.011) and pneumonia (OR, 2.12; 95% CI: 1.003-4.493; p = 0.049) after OE. Meanwhile, LAVR was not correlated with the incidence of post-MIE morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

LAVR may reflect COPD severity and predict severe morbidity and pneumonia after OE, but not after MIE. Less invasiveness of MIE may alleviate the effects of various disadvantageous backgrounds associated with high LAVR on worse short-term outcomes.

Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Is Safe and Cost Equivalent Compared to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in a Tertiary Referral Center

In recent decades, robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been increasingly adopted for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) or cancer of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). However, concerns regarding its costs compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) have emerged. This study examined outcomes and costs of RAMIE versus total MIE in 128 patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for EC/GEJ at our department between 2017 and 2021. Surgical costs were higher for RAMIE (EUR 12,370 vs. EUR 10,059, p < 0.001). Yet, median daily (EUR 2023 vs. EUR 1818, p = 0.246) and total costs (EUR 30,510 vs. EUR 29,180, p = 0.460) were comparable. RAMIE showed a lower incidence of postoperative pneumonia (8% vs. 25%, p = 0.029) and a trend towards shorter hospital stays (15 vs. 17 days, p = 0.205), which may have equalized total costs. Factors independently associated with higher costs included readmission to the intensive care unit (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.0), length of stay (HR = 13.5), anastomotic leak (HR = 17.0), and postoperative pneumonia (HR = 5.4). In conclusion, RAMIE does not impose an additional financial burden. This suggests that RAMIE may be considered as a valid alternative approach for esophagectomy. Attention to typical cost factors can enhance postoperative care across surgical methods.

Survival Impacts of Impaired Lung Functions and Comorbidities on Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative physiological assessments are crucial for optimizing clinical outcomes, especially those of elderly esophageal cancer (EC) patients who are generally frail and at the high risk of mortality.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for EC between 2004 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into elderly (>70 years) or non-elderly (≤70 years) groups. Various physiological parameters including the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), immunonutritional parameters and pulmonary functions were studied. Pulmonary functions included %vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0) and FEV1.0%. The thresholds were set as the lowest quartile (100% for %VC and 2L for FEV1.0) in this cohort. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of non-EC-related deaths.

RESULTS

In total, 824 patients were included (elderly; n = 306, non-elderly; n = 518). Elderly patients had a significantly lower 5-year OS rate than non-elderly patients (53.3% vs. 57.2%, P = 0.03), mainly due to increased risk of death from non-EC related causes. In the elderly group, multivariate Cox hazards analysis identified 3 independent predictors of non-EC-related deaths; high CCI (HR 1.98, P=0.006), low %VC (HR 2.01, P = 0.004) and low FEV1.0 (HR 1.6, P=0.048). Elderly patients without risk factors had a significantly better 5-year OS rate (63.5%) than those with 1 (50.0%) or 2-3 (36.3%) risk factors (P <0.01). Deaths due to pulmonary disease rose significantly as the number of risk factors increased (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of comorbidities and pulmonary function impairments are useful for predicting long-term outcomes, especially non-EC-related deaths, in elderly EC patients.

Quantitative Evaluation of Periodontitis for Predicting the Occurrence of Postoperative Pneumonia After Oncologic Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Periodontitis is a biofilm-associated inflammatory periodontal disease associated with postoperative complications after esophagectomy. However, few studies have evaluated the inflammatory burden posed by periodontitis quantitively for patients undergoing oncologic esophagectomy. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between periodontitis and postoperative pneumonia using periodontal inflammatory surface area (PISA).

METHODS

The study analyzed 251 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The patients were classified into low-PISA and high-PISA groups according to preoperative PISA, and the relationship between the occurrence and severity of postoperative pneumonia was investigated.

RESULTS

The high-PISA group (n = 69) included more males (P < 0.001) and patients with poor performance status (P < 0.024). Postoperative pneumonia occurred more frequently in the high-PISA group than in the low-PISA group (31.9 % vs. 15.9 %; P = 0.008), whereas the incidences of other complications did not differ significantly. In addition, the incidence of severe pneumonia was significantly higher in the high-PISA group (7.2 % vs. 1.6 %; P = 0.038). In the multivariable analysis for adjustment of preoperative confounders, age older than 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; P = 0.006), high PISA (OR, 2.45; P = 0.012), and smoking history (OR, 2.78; P = 0.006) were the independent variables predicting postoperative pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative higher PISA was significantly associated with the occurrence of overall and severe postoperative pneumonia. The quantitative evaluation of periodontitis using PISA is a useful measure for predicting postoperative pneumonia, and intensive periodontal intervention may contribute to decreasing postoperative pneumonia.

Novel Mediastinoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery is an expanding field of surgery that has replaced many open surgical techniques. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of esophageal cancer, yet it is still associated with significant morbidity and technical difficulties. Mediastinoscope-assisted esophagectomy is a promising technique that aims to decrease the surgical burden and enhance recovery.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched for publications on mediastinoscope-assisted esophagectomies for esophageal cancer. The primary endpoint was a postoperative anastomotic leak, while secondary endpoints were assessment of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), blood loss, chyle leak, hospital length of stay (LOS), operative (OR) time, pneumonia, wound infection, mortality, and microscopic positive margin (R1). The pooled event rate (PER) and pooled mean were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six out of the 2274 searched studies were included. The pooled event rate (PER) for anastomotic leak was 0.145 (0.1144; 0.1828). The PERs for chyle leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury/hoarseness, postoperative pneumonia, wound infection, early mortality, postoperative morbidity, and microscopically positive (R1) resection margins were 0.027, 0.185, 0.09, 0.083, 0.020, 0.378, and 0.037 respectively. The pooled means for blood loss, hospital stay, operative time, number of total harvested LNs, and number of harvested thoracic LNs were 159.209, 15.187, 311.116, 23.379, and 15.458 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is a promising minimally invasive technique, avoiding thoracotomy, patient repositioning, and lung manipulation; thus allowing for shorter surgery, decreased blood loss, and decreased postoperative morbidity. It can also be reliable in terms of oncological safety and LN dissection.

Postoperative respiratory morbidity can adversely affect prognosis in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with frequent respiratory morbidities, which may deteriorate postoperative survival outcomes. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) is less invasive and is associated with fewer respiratory morbidities than open esophagectomy. However, the relationship between post-TE respiratory morbidity and prognosis has not been well established.

METHODS

This study included 378 patients who underwent TE for esophageal cancer between May 2011 and November 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of respiratory morbidity. Short-term and long-term outcomes of the groups were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

Respiratory morbidity was significantly associated with heavy past smoking habits (Brinkman index, p = 0.0039), short duration of smoking cessation (p = 0.0012), worse American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (p = 0.016), frequent cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.0085), and long hospital stay (p < 0.001). Respiratory morbidity significantly deteriorated overall survival (OS) (p = 0.011) and relapse-free survival (p = 0.062) and could be an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 1.90, 95% confidence interval = 1.093-3.311, p = 0.023) along with clinical stage.

CONCLUSION

Respiratory morbidity can adversely affect prognosis after TE. Various prophylaxes for respiratory morbidity are required to improve the short-term and long-term outcomes of TE for esophageal cancer.

Concomitant preoperative airflow obstruction confers worse prognosis after trans-thoracic surgery for esophageal cancer

Background

Airflow obstruction is a critical element of chronic airway diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative airflow obstruction on the prognosis of patients following surgery for esophageal carcinoma.

Methods

A total of 821 esophageal cancer patients were included and classified into two groups based on whether or not they had preoperative airflow obstruction. Airflow obstruction was defined as a forced expiration volume in the first second (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio below the lower limit of normal (LLN). A retrospective analysis of the impact of airflow obstruction on the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy was performed.

Results

Patients with airflow obstruction (102/821, 12.4%) had lower three-year overall (42/102, 58.8%) and progression-free survival rate (47/102, 53.9%) than those without airflow obstruction (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that airflow obstruction was an independent risk factor for overall survival (Hazard Ratio = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.17-2.35, P = 0.004) and disease progression (Hazard Ratio = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.1-2.08; P = 0.01). A subgroup analysis revealed that the above results were more significant in male patients, BMI < 23 kg/m² patients or late-stage cancer (stage III-IVA) (P = 0.001) patients and those undergoing open esophagectomy (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preoperative airflow obstruction defined by FEV₁/FVC ratio below LLN was an independent risk factor for mortality in esophageal cancer patients after trans-thoracic esophagectomy. Comprehensive management of airflow obstruction and more personalized surgical decision-making are necessary to improve survival outcomes in esophageal cancer patients.

Risk model for mortality associated with esophagectomy via a thoracic approach based on data from the Japanese National Clinical Database on malignant esophageal tumors

PURPOSE

Postoperative complications after esophagectomy can be severe or fatal and impact the patient's postoperative quality of life and long-term outcomes. The aim of the present study was to develop the best possible model for predicting mortality and complications based on the Japanese Nationwide Clinical Database (NCD).

METHODS

Data registered in the NCD, on 32,779 patients who underwent esophagectomy via a thoracic approach for malignant esophageal tumor between January, 2012 and December, 2017, were used to create a risk model.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate after esophagectomy was 1.0%, and the operative mortality rate was 2.3%. Postoperative complications included pneumonia (13.8%), anastomotic leakage (13.2%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (11.1%), atelectasis (4.9%), and chylothorax (2.5%). Postoperative artificial respiration for over 48 h was required by 7.8% of the patients. Unplanned intubation within 30 postoperative days was performed in 6.2% of the patients. C-indices evaluated using the test data were 0.694 for 30-day mortality and 0.712 for operative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a good risk model for predicting 30-day mortality and operative mortality after esophagectomy based on the NCD. This risk model will be useful for the preoperative prediction of 30-day mortality and operative mortality, obtaining informed consent, and deciding on the optimal surgical procedure for patients with preoperative risks for mortality.

Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Salvage oesophagectomies are associated with an increased risk of mortality, although recent data suggests that long-term survival rates following salvage oesophagectomy are similar to planned oesophagectomy. The aim was therefore to meta-analyse outcomes for patients undergoing salvage versus planned oesophagectomies to assess the differences in short-term mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which compared patients in the planned oesophagectomy group (n = 23 555) to patients in the salvage oesophagectomy group (n = 2227). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of rates of postoperative mortality (5.7% salvage oesophagectomy versus 3.1% planned oesophagectomy, P = 0.0004), anastomotic leak (20.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 14.5% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.00001), pulmonary complications (37.1% salvage oesophagectomy versus 24.2% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001) and R0 margin (87.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 91.3% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between long-term survival rates at 5 years with 39.2% for salvage and 42.6% for planned oesophagectomy (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage oesophagectomies do offer a meaningful chance of long-term survival (at 5 years) for select patients with oesophageal cancer, but the elevated risk of post-operative complications and mortality following salvage oesophagectomy should be recognized.

The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, CBM, and Wanfang Data from inception to March 18, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

This analysis included eight studies, enrolling 264 patients who underwent MIE and 257 patients who underwent OE. The meta-analysis results showed that the MIE group had a higher outcome regarding the percent predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1 month after surgery than the OE group. In addition, those who underwent MIE had lower ΔVC%, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV1 between pre-operation and 1 month after surgery than those who underwent OE. There is no statistical difference between the two groups in ΔMVV.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OE, MIE has a more protective effect on postoperative pulmonary function. However, due to the small number of included literature and all cohort studies, this finding needs to be validated with larger samples and higher quality RCT studies.

Clinical Significance of Pretreatment Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Predictive Marker for Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Background

Clinical significance of red blood cell distribution (RDW) as a predictive marker for the incidence of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has not been established.

Methods

This study included 634 consecutive patients who underwent three-incisional esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2005 and November 2020. Correlation between pretreatment RDW and patient background, cancer background, and short-term outcome after esophagectomy were retrospectively investigated.

Results

Eighty patients (12.6%) had a high pretreatment RDW (> 14.2), which correlated with malnutrition estimated by body mass index, hemoglobin, total lymphocyte count, albumin, and total cholesterol. High pretreatment RDW was an independent risk factor for postoperative severe morbidity of grade IIIb or higher based on the Clavien–Dindo classification (hazard ratio [HR] 3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.707–8.887; p = 0.0012) and reoperation (HR 4.39, 95% CI 1.552–12.390; p = 0.0053) after open esophagectomy (OE). However, RDW was not associated with postoperative morbidity incidence after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

Conclusions

Pretreatment RDW may be a surrogate marker for nutritional status and could be a predictive marker for postoperative severe morbidity, reoperation, and possibly pneumonia after OE. On the contrary, the lower invasiveness of MIE may have reduced the effect of pretreatment malnutrition on morbidity incidence, which could explain the insignificant relationship between RDW and poor short-term outcomes in MIE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10719-2.

Pharmacological treatment to reduce pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is one of the most invasive procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. An invasive surgical procedure causes postoperative lung injury through the surgical procedure and one-lung ventilation during anesthesia. Lung injury developed by inflammatory response to surgical insults and oxidative stress is associated with pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy. Postoperative pulmonary complications negatively affect the long-term outcomes; therefore, an effort to reduce lung injury improves overall survival after esophagectomy. Although significant evidence has not been established, various pharmacological treatments for reducing lung injury, such as administration of a corticosteroid, neutrophil elastase inhibitor, and vitamins are considered to have efficacy for pulmonary morbidity. In this review we survey the following topics: mediators during the perioperative periods of esophagectomy and the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for patients with esophagectomy on pulmonary complications.