Prevention of bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: emerging data and clinical direction

Recombinant porcine factor VIII corrects thrombin generation in vitro in plasma from patients with congenital hemophilia A and inhibitors

Background

Neutralizing factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies are a major complication in hemophilia A. Antihemophilic factor VIII (recombinant), porcine sequence (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa; Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company) has low cross‐reactivity to anti‐human FVIII antibodies and can provide functional FVIII activity in the presence of FVIII inhibitors.

Objectives

Evaluate in vitro thrombin generation and clot formation responses to rpFVIII in blood from patients with congenital hemophilia A.

Methods

In this multicenter study, blood was obtained for in vitro analyses that included human and porcine FVIII inhibitors, low <5 Bethesda units (BU)/ml or high ≥5 BU/ml titer (Nijmegen‐modified Bethesda assay); thrombin generation assay (TGA), clot viscoelasticity (thromboelastography), fibrin clot structure analysis (scanning electron microscopy), and epitope mapping.

Results

Blood samples were from 20 patients with congenital hemophilia A (FVIII activity <1%, mean [range] inhibitor titers: anti‐human FVIII, 14 [1–427] BU/ml [n = 13 high, n = 6 low, n = 1 data unavailable]); anti‐porcine FVIII, 12 (0–886) BU/ml (n = 11 high, n = 8 low, n = 1 data unavailable). Porcine inhibitor titer and TGA response measured by endogenous thrombin potential showed an inverse correlation (2.7–10.8 U/ml rpFVIII Spearman correlation coefficient: −0.594 to −0.773; p < 0.01). Clot structures in low anti‐porcine inhibitor titer plasmas were similar to those in noninhibitor plasma.

Conclusions

Recombinant porcine factor VIII demonstrated a dose‐dependent correction of thrombin generation and clot formation in vitro, dependent on the anti‐porcine FVIII inhibitor titer. Procoagulant responses to rpFVIII occurred in plasma containing FVIII inhibitors.

Costs of the management of hemophilia A with inhibitors in Spain

Introduction

Emicizumab is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody, recently authorized for the treatment of hemophilia A with inhibitors. This study aims to estimate the direct and indirect costs of the management of hemophilia A with inhibitors, in adult and pediatric patients, including the prophylaxis with emicizumab.

Methods

We calculated the costs of the on-demand and prophylactic treatments with bypassing agents (activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII) and the emicizumab prophylaxis, from the societal perspective, over 1 year. The study considered direct healthcare costs (drugs, visits, tests, and hospitalizations), direct non-healthcare costs (informal caregivers), and indirect costs (productivity loss). Data were obtained from a literature review and were validated by an expert group. Costs were expressed in 2019 euros.

Results

Our results showed that the annual costs of the prophylactic treatment per patient varied between €543,062.99 and €821,415.77 for adults, and €182,764.43 and €319,826.59 for children, while on-demand treatment was €532,706.84 and €789,341.91 in adults, and €167,523.05 and €238,304.71 in pediatric patients. In relation to other prophylactic therapies, emicizumab showed the lowest costs, with up to a 34% and 43% reduction in the management cost of adult and pediatric patients, respectively. It reduced the bleeding events and administration costs, as this drug is less frequently administered by subcutaneous route. Emicizumab prophylaxis also decreased the cost of other healthcare resources such as visits, tests, and hospitalizations, as well as indirect costs.

Conclusion

In comparison to prophylaxis with bypassing agents, emicizumab reduced direct and indirect costs, resulting in cost savings for the National Health System and society.

Evaluation of anti-factor VIII antibody levels in patients with haemophilia A receiving immune tolerance induction therapy or bypassing agents

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding episodes in patients who have haemophilia A (HA), a hereditary bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency in factor VIII (FVIII), are treated or prophylactically prevented with infusions of exogenous FVIII. Neutralizing antibodies, referred to as inhibitors, against infusion products are a major complication experienced by up to 30% of patients who have severe HA. Bypassing agents (BPA), a class of therapeutics given to patients who have inhibitors, bypass the need for FVIII in the coagulation cascade, and long-term inhibitor eradication is accomplished using immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI). Data examining the antibody levels in patients receiving BPA and ITI are limited.

AIM

Measure anti-FVIII antibody levels in specimens from patients receiving ITI or BPA in order to evaluate the anti-FVIII antibody response in those patients.

METHODS

Specimens were tested using the CDC-modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) and the CDC fluorescence immunoassay (FLI) for anti-FVIII IgG₁ and IgG₄ .

RESULTS

NBA-negative specimens from patients undergoing ITI or receiving BPAs have a higher frequency of anti-FVIII IgG₄ positivity compared with the previously published level for NBA-negative HA patients. Analysis of anti-FVIII antibody levels in serial samples from patients undergoing ITI reveals that antibodies can persist even after the patient's NBA result falls into the negative range.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of anti-FVIII antibodies may be a useful means to better contextualize NBA results in specimens from patients receiving BPA or ITI. In addition, assessment of anti-FVIII antibody levels has the potential to improve inhibitor surveillance and clinical decision-making related to the progress of ITI.

Bridging the Missing Link with Emicizumab: A Bispecific Antibody for Treatment of Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, characterized by absent or ineffective coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), is a serious bleeding disorder that entails severe and potentially life-threatening bleeding events. Current standard therapy still involves replacement of FVIII, but is often complicated by the occurrence of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). Management of patients with inhibitors is challenging and necessitates immune tolerance induction for inhibitor eradication and the use of bypassing agents (activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant activated factor VII), which are expensive and not always effective. Emicizumab is the first humanized bispecific monoclonal therapeutic antibody designed to replace the hemostatic function of activated FVIII by bridging activated factor IX and factor X (FX) to activate FX and allow the coagulation cascade to continue. In the majority of hemophilic patients with and without inhibitors, emicizumab reduced the annualized bleeding rate to almost zero in several clinical trials and demonstrated a good safety profile. However, the concurrent use of emicizumab and activated prothrombin complex concentrate imposes a high risk of thrombotic microangiopathy and thromboembolic events on patients and should be avoided. Yet, the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery remains challenging with only limited evidence-based recommendations being available. This review summarizes published clinical trials and preliminary reports of emicizumab and discusses the clinical implications of emicizumab in treatment of hemophilia A.

Prophylaxis for hemophilia A without inhibitors: treatment options and considerations

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder traditionally managed with standard half-life (SHL) factor (F) VIII concentrates. Extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products and emicizumab-kywh, a nonfactor therapy, are newer treatment options. Additional nonfactor agents and gene therapy are expected to reach the market in the near future.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed (MEDLINE) search from 1962 to April 2020 related to hemophilia A, its management, and the products currently available for prophylaxis was performed to comprehensively review these topics and analyze the benefits and drawbacks of each therapeutic.

EXPERT OPINION

Prophylaxis with SHL FVIII concentrates remains the standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia A and may also be considered for selected individuals with moderate disease. Several years of real-world experience with EHL FVIII, emicizumab-kywh, and other agents in development will be necessary to determine their ultimate roles in the prevention of bleeding and its complications. Gene therapy may not provide a permanent cure for hemophilia A.

Emicizumab should be prescribed independent of immune tolerance induction

This article has a companion Point by Young.

Over two decades of orthopaedic surgery in patients with inhibitors-Quantifying the complication of bleeding

Patients with haemophilia who have developed inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX present a significant concern to those surgeons who operate on them. The evidence base for bypassing agents such as recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrate has amassed over several decades. The literature is open to positive interpretation on the successful use of these agents in the treatment of inhibitor-positive patients. However, there are equally persistent concerns amongst surgeons, in particular orthopaedic surgeons, regarding the high complication rate of bleeding. To explore and quantify this concern, we present a literature review spanning two decades of publications on haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Irrespective of the progress made with haemostatic protocols, trepidation on embarking on surgery is valid. The high risk of bleeding is a function of the inherent complexity of the disease and rightfully translates into difficulties in its management. Combined with the prospect of orthopaedic surgery, those involved in the care of such patients are justified in their continued anxiety and diligence when considering the benefits in quality of life against the prevalent complications.

Cost analysis of plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor versus recombinant factor VIII for treatment of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A in the United States

BACKGROUND

Inhibitor development to factor VIII (FVIII) hemophilia therapy results in increased complications and substantial economic costs. The SIPPET study, the first randomized controlled trial to compare the immunogenicity of plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII)/von Willebrand factor (VWF) and recombinant-DNA-derived FVIII (rFVIII), demonstrated higher inhibitor rates in previously untreated patients (PUPs) treated with rFVIII than in PUPs treated with pdFVIII/VWF.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the economic impact of treating PUPs with pdFVIII/VWF vs rFVIII.

METHODS

An Excel-based clinical and economic model was developed from a US healthcare payer perspective and run over a 5-year period. The analysis utilized a cohort approach to model patient treatment and outcomes over a monthly cycle to quantify differences in costs of FVIII, bypassing agents, and hospitalizations for serious bleeds. Rates of high-titer inhibitor development were obtained from the SIPPET study. Patients developing high-titer inhibitors were treated with immune tolerance induction (ITI). Patients who developed low-titer inhibitors and those who did not develop inhibitors continued their usual FVIII treatment. Patients who were successfully treated with ITI returned to FVIII treatment, while unsuccessfully treated patients received bypassing agents. Total costs per treated patient were estimated and a one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify the impact of parameter uncertainty on the model outcomes.

RESULTS

Total cumulative costs per patient over 5 years were $834,621 for pdFVIII/VWF patients and $1,237,163 for rFVIII patients, representing a total saving of $402,542 per patient over the 5-year period, for an average annual saving of $80,508 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from the SIPPET study, this analysis found that initiating FVIII treatment in severe hemophilia A PUPs with pdFVIII/VWF has the potential to offer substantial cost savings to healthcare payers, amounting to a one-third reduction in costs.

Novel assays in the coagulation laboratory: a clinical and laboratory perspective

The ability to monitor Factor VIII (FVIII) and Factor IX (FIX) levels is integral to the clinical management of hemophilia A and B patients, respectively. Factor activity levels are checked during regular follow-up, post-infusion of factor concentrates, during pre- and post-operative assessments, and when the presence of an inhibitor is suspected. However, the ability to accurately and reproducibly measure factor activity levels with standard coagulation assays has been challenging due to the emergence of recombinant factor concentrates with extended half-lives. Similarly, special considerations must be given to the type of inhibitor assay used in patients with acquired hemophilia receiving recombinant porcine FVIII replacement. Alternative approaches to achieve hemostasis with clotting factor mimetics and interference of endogenous anticoagulants lack standardized assays for monitoring hemostatic efficacy. Laboratory assays measuring dynamic clotting parameters such as thrombin generation or whole blood viscoelasticity may provide a way forward, but have yet to enter routine clinical use. This review highlights the role of specialized coagulation assays in an era where multiple new hemostatic therapeutics for hemophilia are available, and underscores the need for clear communication between bedside and laboratory clinicians.

RD-05, a novel anti-CD154 antibody, efficiently inhibits generation of anti-drug antibody without the risk of thrombus formation in non-human primates

Antibody formation against therapeutic agents, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and Factor VIII, that leads to treatment failure has become a major challenge in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and hemophilia. It is well known that anti-CD154 antibodies have the highest potential to inhibit these types of adverse immune responses. Nevertheless, the formation of thromboemboli is the major hurdle in the clinical application of these anti-CD154 blocking antibodies. For this, we attempted to derive an idea as to how this major complication can be eliminated. Consequently, we developed a novel anti-CD154 chimeric antibody, which was made by genetic modification of a portion of human IgG4 Fc. This antibody has an almost comparable antigen binding affinity to a previously developed 5C8 clone and near completely inhibited CD40-CD154 interaction and T cell-dependent B cell activation in vitro. Even under the condition, where we injected immune complexes comprised of RD-05 and CD154 antigen, the formation of thromboembolism was not seen in human FcγRIIA-transgenic mice, whereas the converse was exactly true in the case of 5C8 antibody. Notably, just two injections of RD-05 antibody was sufficient to inhibit the antibody formation against adalimumab during 3-4 months in cynomolgus macaques, in which adalimumab was repeatedly injected for 12 weeks. Based on these findings, we suggest that this RD-05 antibody can be applied to antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Spanish Consensus Guidelines on prophylaxis with bypassing agents in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors

Prophylaxis with the blood clotting factor, factor VIII (FVIII) is ineffective for individuals with haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors to FVIII. Prophylaxis with the FVIII bypassing agents activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC; FEIBA® Baxalta) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; Novo-Seven®, Novo Nordisk) may be an effective alternative. It was our aim to develop evidence -and expert opinion- based guidelines for prophylactic therapy for patients with high-titre inhibitors to FVIII. A panel of nine Spanish haematologists undertook a systematic review of the literature to develop consensusbased guidance. Particular consideration was given to prophylaxis in patients prior to undergoing immune tolerance induction (ITI) (a process of continued exposure to FVIII that can restore sensitivity for some patients), during the ITI period and for those not undergoing ITI or for whom ITI had failed. These guidelines offer guidance for clinicians in deciding which patients might benefit from prophylaxis with FVIII bypassing agents, the most appropriate agents in various clinical settings related to ITI, doses and dosing regimens and how best to monitor the efficacy of prophylaxis. The paper includes recommendations on when to interrupt or stop prophylaxis and special safety concerns during prophylaxis. These consensus guidelines offer the most comprehensive evaluation of the clinical evidence base to date and should be of considerable benefit to clinicians facing the challenge of managing patients with severe haemophilia A with high-titre FVIII inhibitors.

Global Post-Authorization Safety Surveillance Study: real-world data on prophylaxis and on-demand treatment using FEIBA (an activated prothrombin complex concentrate)

This prospective, Post-Authorization Safety Surveillance (PASS) study was carried out in patients with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors treated with FEIBA for 1 year to collect real-world data on safety and effectiveness of FEIBA. The study followed a cohort design and did not make stipulations on treatment or observation schedule, as it was designed to observe routine medical practices based on physicians’ treatment decisions, including whether patients received on-demand or prophylaxis with FEIBA. The attending physician maintained documentation, including medical records, laboratory reports, adverse event reports, and so on and a subject diary was used. Eighty-one patients were treated with FEIBA at 40 sites in 10 countries over a 4-year period. Sixty-nine patients (85.2%) had hemophilia A, two had (2.5%) hemophilia B, and ten (12.3%) had acquired hemophilia A. At baseline 45 patients (55.6%) were prescribed prophylaxis and 36 (44.6%) on-demand treatment. This study was novel in following safety and effectiveness in ‘real world’ on-demand and prophylactic use of FEIBA, and was able to collect data in these rare patients under routine clinical practice.

Oral Delivery of Protein Drugs Bioencapsulated in Plant Cells

Plants cells are now approved by the FDA for cost-effective production of protein drugs (PDs) in large-scale current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) hydroponic growth facilities. In lyophilized plant cells, PDs are stable at ambient temperature for several years, maintaining their folding and efficacy. Upon oral delivery, PDs bioencapsulated in plant cells are protected in the stomach from acids and enzymes but are subsequently released into the gut lumen by microbes that digest the plant cell wall. The large mucosal area of the human intestine offers an ideal system for oral drug delivery. When tags (receptor-binding proteins or cell-penetrating peptides) are fused to PDs, they efficiently cross the intestinal epithelium and are delivered to the circulatory or immune system. Unique tags to deliver PDs to human immune or nonimmune cells have been developed recently. After crossing the epithelium, ubiquitous proteases cleave off tags at engineered sites. PDs are also delivered to the brain or retina by crossing the blood–brain or retinal barriers. This review highlights recent advances in PD delivery to treat Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, hypertension, Gaucher's or ocular diseases, as well as the development of affordable drugs by eliminating prohibitively expensive purification, cold chain and sterile delivery.

Advances in the clinical management of inhibitors in hemophilia A and B

Inhibitors to factor (F)VIII or FIX are the most serious and challenging complication of hemophilia treatment, increasing morbidity and mortality because bleeds no longer respond to standard clotting factor replacement therapy. For patients with high-titer inhibitors, immune tolerance induction achieved through regular factor exposure is the only proven therapy capable of Inhibitor eradication and is almost always indicated for inhibitors of recent onset. Bypassing therapy is used to treat and prevent bleeding, but neither of the two currently available bypassing agents has the predictable hemostatic efficacy of factor replacement in hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Major research efforts are focused on the development of new, more potent therapies for the management of patients with inhibitors.

First prospective report on immune tolerance in poor risk haemophilia A inhibitor patients with a single factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate in an observational immune tolerance induction study

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Development of neutralizing inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of haemophilia A treatment.

AIM

The ongoing, international, open-label, uncontrolled, observational immune tolerance induction (ObsITI) study evaluates ITI, the standard of care in patients with inhibitors.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Forty-eight prospective patients in this interim analysis received a single plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized, FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF) for ITI. According to recommended Bonn protocol, 'low responders' at ITI start (<5 BU) received 50-100 IU FVIII kg(-1) daily, or every other day; 'high responders' (≥5 BU) received 100 IU FVIII kg(-1) every 12 h.

RESULTS

Forty of 48 patients (83.3%), had at least one risk factor for poor ITI-prognosis at ITI start (i.e. age ≥7 years, >2 years since inhibitor diagnosis, inhibitor titre ≥10 BU at the start of ITI, or prior ITI failure). Nonetheless, 34 patients (70.8%) achieved complete success, 3 (6.3%) partial success, 1 (2.1%) partial response; ITI failed in 10 patients (20.8%), all with poor prognosis factors. All six low responders achieved complete success. ITI outcome was significantly associated with inhibitor titre level at ITI start (P = 0.0068), number of poor prognosis factors for ITI success (P = 0.0187), monthly bleeding rate during ITI (P = 0.0005) and peak inhibitor titre during ITI (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two of 35 high responder patients (62.9%) with ≥1 poor prognosis factor achieved complete success.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a single pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, mainly according to the Bonn protocol, resulted in a high ITI success rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors and poor prognosis for ITI success.

How I use bypassing therapy for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors

Inhibitor development poses a significant challenge in the management of hemophilia because once an inhibitor is present, bleeding episodes can no longer be treated with standard clotting factor replacement therapy. Consequently, patients with inhibitors are at increased risk for difficult-to-control bleeding and complications, particularly arthropathy and physical disability. Three clinical trials in patients with inhibitors have demonstrated that prophylaxis with a bypassing agent reduces joint and other types of bleeding and improves health-related quality of life compared with on-demand bypassing therapy. In hemophilia patients without inhibitors, the initiation of prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII or FIX prior to the onset of recurrent hemarthroses can prevent the development of joint disease. Whether this is also true for bypassing agent prophylaxis remains to be determined.

Anti-A2 and anti-A1 domain antibodies are potential predictors of immune tolerance induction outcome in children with hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) is a congenital bleeding disorder resulting from factor VIII deficiency. The most serious complication of HA management is the appearance of inhibitory antibodies (Abs) against injected FVIII concentrates. To eradicate inhibitors, immune tolerance induction (ITI) is usually attempted, but it fails in up to 30% of cases. Currently, no undisputed predictive marker of ITI outcome is available to facilitate the clinical decision.

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictive markers of ITI efficacy.

METHODS

The isotypic and epitopic repertoires of inhibitory Abs were analyzed in plasma samples collected before ITI initiation from 15 children with severe HA and high-titer inhibitors, and their levels were compared in the two outcome groups (ITI success [n = 7] and ITI failure [n = 8]). The predictive value of these candidate biomarkers and of the currently used indicators (inhibitor titer and age at ITI initiation, highest inhibitor titer before ITI, and interval between inhibitor diagnosis and ITI initiation) was then compared by statistical analysis (Wilcoxon test and receiver receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve analysis).

RESULTS

Whereas current indicators seemed to fail in discriminating patients in the two outcome groups (ITI success or failure), anti-A1 and anti-A2 Ab levels before ITI initiation appeared to be good potential predictive markers of ITI outcome (P < 0.018). ROC analysis showed that anti-A1 and anti-A2 Abs were the best at discriminating between outcome groups (area under the ROC curve of > 0.875).

CONCLUSION

Anti-A1 and anti-A2 Abs could represent new promising tools for the development of ITI outcome prediction tests for children with severe HA.

Characterization of the anti-factor VIII immunoglobulin profile in patients with hemophilia A by use of a fluorescence-based immunoassay

BACKGROUND

The development of neutralizing antibodies, referred to as inhibitors, against factor VIII is a major complication associated with FVIII infusion therapy for the treatment of hemophilia A (HA). Previous studies have shown that a subset of HA patients and a low percentage of healthy individuals harbor non-neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies that do not elicit the clinical manifestations associated with inhibitor development.

OBJECTIVE

To assess HA patients' anti-FVIII antibody profiles as potential predictors of clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A fluorescence immunoassay (FLI) was used to detect anti-FVIII antibodies in 491 samples from 371 HA patients.

RESULTS

Assessments of antibody profiles showed that the presence of anti-FVIII IgG1 , IgG2 or IgG4 correlated qualitatively and quantitatively with the presence of an FVIII inhibitor as determined with the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA). Forty-eight patients with a negative inhibitor history contributed serial samples to the study, including seven patients who had negative NBA titers initially and later converted to being NBA-positive. The FLI detected anti-FVIII IgG1 in five of those seven patients prior to their conversion to NBA-positive. Five of 15 serial-sample patients who had a negative inhibitor history and had anti-FVIII IgG1 later developed an inhibitor, as compared with two of 33 patients with a negative inhibitor history without anti-FVIII IgG1 .

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide a rationale for future studies designed both to monitor the dynamics of anti-FVIII antibody profiles in HA patients as a potential predictor of future inhibitor development and to assess the value of the anti-FVIII FLI as a supplement to traditional inhibitor testing.

Factor VIII therapy for hemophilia A: current and future issues

Hemophilia A is a congenital, recessive, X-linked bleeding disorder that is managed with infusions of plasma-derived or recombinant factor (F) VIII. The primary considerations in FVIII replacement therapy today are the: 1) immunogenicity of FVIII concentrates, 2) role of longer-acting FVIII products, 3) prophylactic use of FVIII in children and adults with severe hemophilia A, and 4) affordability and availability of FVIII products. Improving patient outcomes by increasing the use of FVIII prophylaxis, preventing or eliminating FVIII inhibitors, and expanding access to FVIII concentrates in developing countries are the major challenges confronting clinicians who care for patients with hemophilia A.

Physician preferences for medication attributes for the prophylactic treatment of patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors to factor VIII

Prophylaxis may be beneficial for patients with severe haemophilia A who have developed inhibitors to factor VIII. The aim of this study was to determine physicians' preferences for medication attributes in the prophylactic treatment of this patient population. Haematologists from Europe (EU) and the United States (US) participated in a discrete choice exercise to explore their preferences for medication attributes (efficacy, cost, scientific evidence, dosing frequency and administration time) associated with prophylaxis for severe haemophilia A in patients with inhibitors to factor VIII. Physicians' preferences for medication attributes were assessed through completion of 25 trade-off tasks that included a choice between two hypothetical medications each comprised of one randomized level of each medication attribute. Participants also completed a sociodemographic questionnaire. Data were analysed using a random effects logit model. Participants (N = 36: US = 19; EU = 17) were 80.6% men, had a mean of 19.8 years (SD ± 8.1) [range 6-35] of practice experience. The physicians treated an average of 5.7 (± 5.5) patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors per month and reported treating 36.2% of these patients prophylactically. The most important medication attributes for prophylactic treatment were efficacy [Relative Importance (RI) = 35.0%] and scientific evidence (RI = 34.1%), whereas treatment cost (12.0%), dosing frequency (10.8%) and administration time (8.2%) were less important. Results were similar across the EU and US. Efficacy and scientific evidence are the primary considerations for physicians' choice of prophylactic medications for use in this patient population.

Anti-inhibitor coagulant complex prophylaxis in hemophilia with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors are at increased risk for serious bleeding complications and progression to end-stage joint disease. Effective strategies to prevent bleeding in such patients have not yet been established.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with hemophilia A who were older than 2 years of age, had high-titer inhibitors, and used concentrates known as bypassing agents for bleeding in a prospective, randomized, crossover study comparing 6 months of anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (AICC), infused prophylactically at a target dose of 85 U per kilogram of body weight (±15%) on 3 nonconsecutive days per week, with 6 months of on-demand therapy (AICC at a target dose of 85 U per kilogram [±15%] used for bleeding episodes). The two treatment periods were separated by a 3-month washout period, during which patients received on-demand therapy for bleeding. The primary outcome was the number of bleeding episodes during each 6-month treatment period.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent randomization; 26 patients completed both treatment periods and could be evaluated per protocol for the efficacy analysis. As compared with on-demand therapy, prophylaxis was associated with a 62% reduction in all bleeding episodes (P<0.001), a 61% reduction in hemarthroses (P<0.001), and a 72% reduction in target-joint bleeding (≥3 hemarthroses in a single joint during a 6-month treatment period) (P<0.001). Thirty-three randomly assigned patients received at least one infusion of the study drug and were evaluated for safety. One patient had an allergic reaction to the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

AICC prophylaxis at the dosage evaluated significantly and safely decreased the frequency of joint and other bleeding events in patients with severe hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors. (Funded by Baxter BioScience; Pro-FEIBA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221195.).

Current difficulties and recent advances in bypass therapy for the management of hemophilia with inhibitors: a new and practical formulation of recombinant factor VIIa

Bypassing agents are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hemophilia with high-titer inhibitors. Whereas the availability of these agents has greatly advanced the management of bleeding episodes in this population, timely administration of bypassing agents continues to be hampered by a number of practical limitations, including the need for refrigerated storage of the agent and its reconstitution at room temperature prior to administration, among others. In this review, the importance of early treatment of bleeds and factors that influence this more timely therapeutic approach are highlighted, together with the advantages offered by the use of a new formulation of recombinant activated factor VII that permits improved storage and portability, potentially optimizing timely bypassing agent administration.

Challenges of defining reliable clinical surrogate end points in haemophilia trials: a critical review

The success of a treatment in haemophilia patients experiencing a bleeding episode is very difficult to define. A variety of efficacy assessment tools have been developed in an effort to better assess when haemostasis has been achieved. These assessment tools are particularly important for the evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic agents whose mechanism of action is based on pharmacological activity in haemostasis rather than upon the principle of 'replacement therapy'. This review focuses on a number of efficacy measures, summarizing their methodology and discussing their validity. In addition, future developments and requirements in order to evaluate the effectiveness of haemostatic treatment are discussed. The majority of end points used for evaluation of haemostasis relate to the relief of symptoms arising from bleeds. The results of this review highlight that several efficacy end points are frequently combined in order to provide a more comprehensive assessment of efficacy. Key limitations of current methodology are the subjectivity of assessment by either the patient or clinician, and the incomparability of results between trials.

Paediatric haemophilia with inhibitors: existing management options, treatment gaps and unmet needs

Development of inhibitors is a severe complication of haemophilia posing many management challenges. While a long-term goal in inhibitor patients is eradication of inhibitors through immune tolerance induction, bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) are essential for control of bleeding episodes. Paediatric patients with haemophilia and inhibitors are at particular risk of recurrent haemarthroses, and management of these patients should seek to avoid joint damage and support the child's full social and physical development. Current options for management of bleeding complications include on-demand treatment of acute bleeding episodes, secondary prophylaxis to avoid recurrent bleeds and surgery to treat affected joints. There is also a rationale for adopting prophylactic approaches to prevent bleeding in inhibitor patients, allowing this group similar opportunities for protection against arthropathy development as are given to non-inhibitor patients. This paper, based on a roundtable meeting of haematology experts at the first Zürich Haemophilia Forum in May 2008, reviews the current evidence supporting more intense and prophylactic approaches to manage bleeding risk in paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors, and highlights the need for investigations of primary prophylaxis in this vulnerable patient group, to support best long-term outcome.

Animal models of FVIIa gene expression: their role in the future development of haemophilia treatment

The development of inhibitors to replacement factor therapy is a serious complication in the treatment of patients with haemophilia and requires use of bypassing agents to prevent uncontrolled bleeding. The efficacy of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) as a bypassing agent in patients with haemophilia has been demonstrated in case studies and clinical trials. However, the perception of a short plasma half-life and consequent need for repeated daily injections means that long-term prophylaxis could potentially be limiting. Canine haemophilia models using a gene transfer approach have been used to evaluate the continuous expression of FVIIa in dogs. These studies show improvement in measurable bleeding parameters that have important clinical ramifications for patients with haemophilia. The combination of gene transfer as the method of delivery and FVII as the transgene overcomes issues associated with the short plasma half-life of rFVIIa, and represents a potentially attractive novel approach to haemostasis in patients with haemophilia and other platelet disorders.

Prophylaxis in 10 patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitor: different approaches for different clinical situations

The effect of bypassing agents is not as predictable as replacement therapy with the deficient factor in inhibitor patients. Consequently, these patients have more levels of arthropathy than patients without inhibitors. Prophylaxis for inhibitor patients has gained attention over the last decade and some papers have reported that bypassing agents could work in the prevention of arthropathy. However, there is a lack data to support any specific agent or regimen or even to recommend their use in different clinical conditions. We report ten patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors treated prophylacticaly with bypassing agents (5 with FEIBA and 5 with NovoSeven). The variable conditioning the choice of one agent or the other was the intention to initiate of immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) in the future. In 8/10 patients (4 in FEIBA group and 4 in rFVIIa group) there was a decrease of bleeding episodes while 9/10 maintained or increased their joint range of motion (ROM). In the rFVIIa prophylaxis group, prophylaxis can be considered primary since all of them had had less than one joint bleed before prophylaxis. Economic analysis showed that prophylaxis is an expensive treatment. In our experience both agents seem to be safe and effective in reducing the number of bleeds in patients with inhibitors. The anamnestic response provoked by FEIBA could be an issue while awaiting a decline in titres before ITI can be initiated and so rFVIIa may be the best option for prophylaxis in patients with inhibitors who have not yet begun ITI.

Experience with a third generation recombinant factor VIII concentrate (Advate) for immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A

The development of an inhibitor represents one of the most challenging complications in patients with haemophilia A. Optimal management is immune tolerance induction (ITI), typically through the administration of high doses of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate. Among 12 patients who underwent ITI using Advate, a third-generation recombinant FVIII product that is free of animal and human protein additives, tolerance was achieved in nine (75%), including seven of 10 patients (70%) with high-titre inhibitors. ITI is ongoing in two patients and not yet successful; immune tolerance failed in the third patient. The median time to success was 4.0 months for group as a whole and for patients with high-titre inhibitors. Treatment was well tolerated, and no adverse events were observed. Advate was found to be equivalent to other FVIII products with regard to both ITI success rates and the incidence of adverse effects when used in these immune tolerance regimens.