Fresh vs. frozen allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell grafts: A successful timely option

Outcomes with allogeneic stem cell transplant using cryopreserved versus fresh hematopoietic progenitor cell products

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) is a mainstay of treatment for hematologic malignancies such as acute leukemias and aggressive lymphomas. Historically, fresh hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) products have been preferred to cryopreserved products (cryo-HPC) due to concerns of loss of stem cell viability and number with the cryopreservation procedure.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients who received cryo-HPCs during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare this against historical cohorts that received fresh HPC.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was conducted on all adult patients who received a peripheral blood alloHSCT in British Columbia, Canada between June 2017 and November 2021. Baseline characteristics, Kaplan-Meier (KM) overall survival (OS), engraftment, and incidences of acute and chronic graft versus host disease were compared between patients who received cryo-HPCs and fresh HPCs. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable analysis was performed using a backward stepwise selection procedure to generate predictors of OS, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and primary and secondary graft failure.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-three patients were included in the analysis, with cryo-HPC representing 40%. Median viability was higher in the fresh-HPC group at 99.2% (IQR 98.3-99.5) versus cryo-HPCs at 97.0% (96.0, 98.6) (P < 0.01). The 12-month actuarial survivals were 77% in the fresh HPC and 75% in the cryo-HPC groups (P = 0.21). There were no differences between cryo-HPCs and fresh HPCs on univariable analysis of OS, CIR, or NRM. There was a shorter median time to platelet engraftment in patients receiving fresh HPC at 17 days (IQR 16, 20) versus cryo-HPC at 21 days (IQR 18, 29), P < 0.001. There was a shorter median time to neutrophil engraftment in the fresh HPC group at 17 days (IQR 14, 20) versus 20 days (17, 23), P < 0.001. Cryo-HPC accounted for 5 out of 6 cases of primary graft failure (P = 0.04), and 3 out of five cases of secondary graft failure (P = 0.39). There were no significant differences in acute GVHD between the fresh HPC and cryo-HPC groups (P = 0.34). The incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD was 32% in the fresh-HPC group and 17% in the cryo-HPC group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, cryopreservation did not emerge as an independent predictor of OS, CIR, NRM, primary GF or secondary GF. However, viability <90% on arrival at our center was a significant predictor of OS (HR 5.3, 2.3-12.3, P < 0.01), primary graft failure (OR 36.3, 5.4-210.2, P < 0.01), and secondary graft failure (OR 18.4, 1.7-121.1, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received cryo-HPCs had similar OS and relapse rates to those who received fresh-HPCs but typically took 2-3 days longer to achieve engraftment of platelets or neutrophils and were associated increased primary graft failure. However, after accounting for multiple variables, cryopreservation was no longer a significant predictor of survival or engraftment while viability <90% emerged as an important predictor of OS, primary graft failure, and secondary graft failure. If confirmed, this suggests that viability on arrival at the infusion center may be a good quality control indicator used to identify HPC products that may warrant recollection if the risk of graft failure is sufficiently increased.

Pros and Cons of Cryopreserving Allogeneic Stem Cell Products

The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitously changed the practice of transplanting fresh allografts. The safety measures adopted during the pandemic prompted the near-universal graft cryopreservation. However, the influence of cryopreserving allogeneic grafts on long-term transplant outcomes has emerged only in the most recent literature. In this review, the basic principles of cell cryopreservation are revised and the effects of cryopreservation on the different graft components are carefully reexamined. Finally, a literature revision on studies comparing transplant outcomes in patients receiving cryopreserved and fresh grafts is illustrated.

The effect of cryopreservation on engraftment kinetics in fully matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Real-life data and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The standard approach for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is to administer donor cells on the same day as a fresh product to a patient who has been given a preparative regimen. The difficulty in collecting and transporting donor cells, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, has made it essential to collect and cryopreserve the grafts before the recipient begins the transplant preparation regimen. However, the short- and long-term impacts of cryopreservation on transplant outcomes remain controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 93 patients who underwent allo-SCT between January 2012 and August 2022 at the Stem Cell Transplant Unit of Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine using frozen and fresh products of peripheral blood stem cells from a fully matched sibling donor. The effect of cryopreservation of donor grafts on engraftment kinetics was investigated.

RESULTS

Frozen and fresh products were used in 37 and 56 patients, respectively. The majority of patients had acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The median age at transplantation was 41 years. Neutrophil engraftment time was similar between the two groups (median: 14 vs. 16 days, p = 0.393). Platelet engraftment time was longer in the frozen product group (median: 12 vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between freezing time and viability. The acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rate was 37.8 % in the frozen product group and 28.6 % in the fresh product group (p = 0.349). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of primary and secondary graft failure, chronic GVHD, 30-day chimerism, relapse, overall survival, progression-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality.

CONCLUSION

Having donor cells ready before transplantation significantly prevents donor-induced adverse events and provides confidence and practicality to both the clinician and the recipient. Allo-SCT with frozen products is a successful method that can be safely applied, especially when disruptions in donor-derived cell collection or transportation are foreseen.

Fresh or frozen grafts for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: conceptual considerations and a survey on the practice during the COVID-19 pandemic from the EBMT Infectious Diseases Working Party (IDWP) and Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party (CTIWP)

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on medical practices, including the delivery of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In response, transplant centers have made changes to their procedures, including an increased use of cryopreservation for allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) grafts. The use of cryopreserved grafts for allogeneic HCT has been reviewed and analysed in terms of potential benefits and drawbacks based on existing data on impact on cell subsets, hematological recovery, and clinical outcomes of approximately 2000 patients from different studies. A survey of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers was also conducted to assess changes in practice during the pandemic and any unnecessary burdens on HPC donors. Before the pandemic, only 7.4% of transplant centers were routinely cryopreserving HPC products, but this percentage increased to 90% during the pandemic. The results of this review and survey suggest that cryopreservation of HPC grafts is a viable option for allogeneic HCT in certain situations, but further research is needed to determine long-term effects and ethical discussions are required to balance the needs of donors and patients when using frozen allografts.

Choosing Between Older Matched Sibling Donor and Younger Matched Unrelated Donor in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The choice between an older matched sibling donor (MSD) and a younger matched unrelated donor (MUD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this single-center retrospective study of 377 patients who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we compared outcomes of 85 patients who received grafts from MSDs age >60 years and 292 patients who received grafts from MUDs age <30 years. Compared to recipients of MSD transplants, recipients of MUD transplants were younger and more likely to receive dual T cell depletion (TCD), a higher CD34+ cell dose, and a fresh graft. Recipients of MSD transplants were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy longer than those who received MUD grafts. We found no differences in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, engraftment, graft failure, and acute GVHD between recipients of MSD grafts and recipients of MUD grafts. We report a higher 30-day incidence, but not 1-year incidence, of bloodstream infections among recipients of MUD transplants compared to subjects who received their grafts from a MSD. The incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was higher in MSD graft recipients compared with MUD graft recipients in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Although this difference could reflect the greater use of dual TCD, known to be associated with very low rates of chronic GVHD in MUD transplant recipients, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was no different between MSD and MUD transplant recipients following propensity score matching, suggesting that other variables could be responsible. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with AML or MDS who receive PBSC transplants, such factors as convenience, ease of access, and costs should be considered when selecting an older MSD over a younger MUD.

Cryopreservation of Growth Factor-Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Does Not Compromise Major Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

During the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, cryopreservation of allogeneic donor stem cell products ensured the availability of products at the start of conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Following recommendations from unrelated donor registries, including the National Marrow Donor Program, many centers began to cryopreserve related donor peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products. Throughout this process, several centers have published outcomes with cryopreserved versus fresh products, some with conflicting results. Even though cryopreservation was initially considered only a temporary measure driven by the pandemic, potential advantages include greater flexibility of transplantation timing. However, concerns about detrimental effects of cryopreservation, including increased risk of graft rejection, relapse, and consequent mortality, remained. The primary objective of the present study was to describe our center's experience comparing outcomes following PBSC transplantation with cryopreserved versus fresh grafts. This was an observational case study with a retrospective review comparing cryopreserved grafts (n = 213) to a recent historical cohort (controls) using fresh grafts (n = 167). In multivariable analyses, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for fresh versus cryopreserved grafts was 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], .79 to 1.82; P = .40) for overall mortality, .99 (95% CI, .55 to 1.77; P = .98) for nonrelapse mortality, and .94 (95% CI, .60 to 1.48; P = .80) for relapse. The adjusted HR for platelet engraftment was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.63; P = .02) and the odds ratio of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.01 to 3.04; P = .05) with fresh grafts compared to cryopreserved grafts. There was no demonstrable difference in the risk of chronic GHVD. Although longer-term follow-up is needed, these data provide preliminary reassurance that in the event of another pandemic or should the logistical need arise in individual patients, cryopreservation of PBSC products is a reasonably safe alternative.

Clinical impact of cryopreservation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell grafts during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Marrow Donor Program mandated the cryopreservation of hematopoietic cell grafts from volunteer unrelated donors because of numerous patient and donor safety concerns and logistical hurdles. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research outcomes database, we report the impact of cryopreservation on overall survival (OS) and other outcomes within 1 year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We analyzed 1543 recipients of cryopreserved allografts receiving HCT at US centers during the first 6 months of the pandemic and compared them with 2499 recipients of fresh allografts during a 6-month period in 2019. On multivariable regression analysis, we observed no difference in the OS (P = .09), nonrelapse mortality (P = .89), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or GVHD- and relapse-free survival (P = .58) in recipients of cryopreserved vs fresh allografts. Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in the cryopreserved allograft recipients (P = .006) because of a higher risk of relapse (P = .01) compared with the fresh allograft recipients. Primary graft failure was higher (P = .01), and the risk of chronic GVHD was lower (P = .001) with cryopreservation compared with fresh grafts. In conclusion, although there was no negative impact of cryopreservation on OS, relapse was higher, and DFS was lower than that with no cryopreservation. Fresh grafts are recommended as the pandemic-related logistical hurdles resolve. Cryopreservation should be considered an option for patients when fresh grafts are not feasible.

Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Graft Characterization and Engraftment Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered the deployment of unfamiliar measures to safeguard successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Among these measures, cryopreservation offered logistical benefits that could outlast the pandemic, including graft availability and timely clinical service. The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution in patients transplanted with cryopreserved allogeneic stem cell products during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We evaluated 44 patients who underwent allo-HCT using cryopreserved grafts consisting of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) apheresis (A) and bone marrow (BM) products at Mount Sinai Hospital. Comparative analyses of 37 grafts infused fresh during the one-year period preceding the pandemic were performed. Assessment of cellular therapy products included total nucleated cell and CD34+ cell enumeration, viability, and post-thaw recovery. The primary clinical endpoint was the evaluation of engraftment (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and platelet count) and donor chimerism (presence of CD33+ and CD3+ donor cells) at day +30 and +100 post-transplant. Adverse events related to cell infusion were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between the fresh and cryopreserved groups with 2 exceptions in the HPC-A cohort: the number of patients in the cryopreserved group that received haploidentical grafts was 6 times that in the fresh group, and the number of patients in the fresh group with a Karnofsky performance score >90 was double that in the cryopreserved group. The quality of HPC-A and HPC-BM products was not affected by cryopreservation, and all grafts met the release criteria for infusion. The pandemic did not affect the time between collection and cryopreservation (median, 24 hours) and time in storage (median, 15 days). Median time to ANC recovery was significantly delayed in recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A (15 vs 11 days, P = .0121), and there was a trend toward delayed platelet engraftment (24 vs 19 days, P = .0712). The delay in ANC and platelet recovery was not observed when only matched graft recipients were compared. Cryopreservation did not affect the ability of HPC-BM grafts to engraft and reconstitute hematopoiesis, and there was no difference in the rates of ANC and platelet recovery. Achievement of donor CD3/CD33 chimerism was not affected by cryopreservation of either HPC-A or HPC-BM products. Graft failure was observed in only 1 case, a recipient of cryopreserved HPC-BM. Three recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A grafts died before ANC engraftment from infectious complications. Remarkably, 22% of our studied population had myelofibrosis, and almost half received cryopreserved HPC-A grafts with no graft failure observed. Finally, patients receiving cryopreserved grafts were at a higher risk of infusion-related adverse events than those receiving fresh grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts results in adequate product quality with minimal impact on short-term clinical outcomes, except for an increased risk of infusion-related adverse events. Cryopreservation is a safe option in terms of graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution with logistical benefits, but additional data are needed to determine long-term outcomes and assess whether this is a suitable strategy for at-risk patients.

Early Stage Professionals Committee Proceedings from the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy 2022 Annual Meeting

In this Committee Proceedings, representatives from the Early Stage Professional (ESP) committee highlight the innovative discoveries and key take-aways from oral presentations at the 2022 International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT) Annual Meeting that cover the following subject categories: Immunotherapy, Exosomes and Extracellular Vesicles, HSC/Progenitor Cells and Engineering, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, and ISCT Late-Breaking Abstracts.

Characterization and Function of Cryopreserved Bone Marrow from Deceased Organ Donors: A Potential Viable Alternative Graft Source

Despite the readily available graft sources for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), a significant unmet need remains in the timely provision of suitable unrelated donor grafts. This shortage is related to the rarity of certain HLA alleles in the donor pool, nonclearance of donors owing to infectious disease or general health status, and prolonged graft procurement and processing times. An alternative hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) graft source obtained from the vertebral bodies (VBs) of deceased organ donors could alleviate many of the obstacles associated with using grafts from healthy living donors or umbilical cord blood (UCB). Deceased organ donor-derived bone marrow (BM) can be preemptively screened, cryogenically banked for on-demand use, and made available in adequate cell doses for HCT. We have developed a good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compliant process to recover and cryogenically bank VB-derived HPCs from deceased organ donor (OD) BM. Here we present results from an analysis of HPCs from BM obtained from 250 deceased donors to identify any substantial difference in composition or quality compared with HPCs from BM aspirated from the iliac crests of healthy living donors. BM from deceased donor VBs was processed in a central GMP facility and packaged for cryopreservation in 5% DMSO/2.5% human serum albumin. BM aspirated from living donor iliac crests was obtained and used for comparison. A portion of each specimen was analyzed before and after cryopreservation by flow cytometry and colony-forming unit potential. Bone marrow chimerism potential was assessed in irradiated immunocompromised NSG mice. Analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used to determine how cryopreservation affects BM cells and to evaluate indicators of successful engraftment of BM cells into irradiated murine models. The t test (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) was used to compare cells from deceased donors and living donors. A final dataset of complete clinical and matched laboratory data from 226 cryopreserved samples was used in linear regressions to predict outcomes of BM HPC processing. When compared before and after cryopreservation, OD-derived BM HPCs were found to be stable, with CD34+ cells maintaining high viability and function after thawing. The yield from a single donor is sufficient for transplantation of an average of 1.6 patients (range, 1.2 to 7.5). CD34+ cells from OD-derived HPCs from BM productively engrafted sublethally irradiated immunocompromised mouse BM (>44% and >67% chimerism at 8 and 16 weeks, respectively). Flow cytometry and secondary transplantation confirmed that OD HPCs from BM is composed of long-term engrafting CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90+CD49f+ HSCs. Linear regression identified no meaningful predictive associations between selected donor-related characteristics and OD BM HPC quality or yield. Collectively, these data demonstrate that cryopreserved BM HPCs from deceased organ donors is potent and functionally equivalent to living donor BM HPCs and is a viable on-demand graft source for clinical HCT. Prospective clinical trials will soon commence in collaboration with the Center for International Blood and Marrow Research to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of Ossium HPCs from BM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05068401).

Cryopreserved versus fresh peripheral blood allogeneic stem cell transplantation outcomes in patients receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host prophylaxis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single center experience

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Cryopreservation of grafts is not common practice in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. However, our center had to use cryopreserved cells for allogeneic HSCT during the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid delays in transplantation due to uncertainty regarding patient and donor exposures.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated post-transplant engraftment and survival outcomes of adult patients who received cryopreserved versus fresh allografts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with hematologic malignancies received either cryopreserved (n = 34) or fresh (n = 21) allogeneic HSCT using peripheral blood stem cells between January 2020 and December 2020. At a median follow-up time of 15 months, cryopreserved allograft recipients had significantly lower overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02). They also experienced significantly delayed neutrophil (p = 0.01) and platelet engraftments (p < 0.0001), as well as higher red blood cell transfusion-dependence after day + 60 (67.6% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.01). Significantly more cryopreserved allograft recipients received donor lymphocyte infusion than fresh allograft recipients (35.3% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.01). Neither relapse-free survival nor non-relapse mortality differed significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Cryopreservation of allografts in combination with post-transplant cyclophosphamide may negatively affect engraftment and OS outcomes in HSCT recipients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the COVID-19 era

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients are especially vulnerable to coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), because of their profound immunodeficiency. Indeed, the first pandemic wave was marked by a high mortality rate in this population. Factors increasing immunodepression such as older age, immunosuppressive treatments or a short delay between transplant and infection appear to worsen the prognosis. Many changes in clinical practice had to be implemented in order to limit this risk, including postponing of transplant for non-malignant diseases, preference for local rather than international donations and for peripheral blood as stem cell source, and the widespread use of cryopreservation. The great revolution in the COVID-19 pandemic came from the development of mRNA vaccines that have shown to be able to prevent severe forms of the disease. More than 75% of allo-HSCT recipients develop seroconversion after 2 doses of vaccine. Multiple studies have identified lymphopenia, exposure to immunosuppressive or anti-CD20 therapies, and a short post-transplant period as factors associated with a poor response to vaccination. The use of repeated injections of the vaccine, including a third dose, not only improves the seroconversion rate but also intensifies the immune response, both in B cells and T cells. Vaccines are an effective and well-tolerated method in this high-risk population. Some studies investigated the possibility of immune protection being transferred from a vaccinated donor to a recipient, with encouraging initial results. However, dynamic mutations and immune escape of the virus can lead to breakthrough infections with new variants in vaccinated individuals and still represent a threat of severe disease in allo-HSCT recipients. New challenges include the need to adapt vaccine protection to emerging variants.

Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells as a safe and effective alternative for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard procedure for multiple myeloma and the grafts are usually cryopreserved. Previous studies reported advantages in the use of fresh peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) autotransplantation compared to cryopreservation of the grafts. This study compared the transplant-related outcomes of two graft preservation methods: fresh storage (4°C/72 h) and cryopreservation (-80°C).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed an analysis of 45 patients with multiple myeloma under autotransplantation (17 fresh and 28 cryopreserved) from 2017 to 2021. Fresh PBSC were maintained in the refrigerator for three days in a concentration up to 300 × 10³ TNC/μL. Cryopreserved PBSC were concentrated by plasma reduction after centrifugation (950 g/10 min/4°C) and an equal volume of cryoprotection solution was added for a final concentration of 300 × 10³ TNC/μL, 5% DMSO, 6% hydroxyethyl starch, and 3% human albumin.

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with fresh PBSCs (10 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.045). Adverse effects were more common in cryopreserved PBSC transplantation (75% vs. 35.3% patients; p = 0.013). Post transplantation hospital stay was 20 and 22 days for fresh and cryopreserved PBSCs respectively (p = 0.091). There was no difference in platelet engraftment time (10.5 days for both; p = 0.133), number of antibiotics used after transplantation (3 for fresh and 2.5 for cryopreserved; p = 0.828), days of antibiotic use after transplantation (12.2 days for fresh and 13.3 days for cryopreserved, p = 0.579), and overall survival (p = 0.736).

CONCLUSION

The infusion of fresh PBSC refrigerated for up to three days is effective and safe for autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma, which is a useful alternative to cryopreserved PBSC.

Impact of Cryopreservation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) in Transplantation from Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD)

Background: Cryopreservation of PBSC for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was implemented due to the current Coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The impact of match unrelated donor (MUD) graft freezing on the outcome of allo-HSCT in terms of hematological recovery, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and survival are still controversial. Methods: In this study, we compared graft composition, clinical characteristics, and outcome of 31 allo-HSCT from MUD cryopreserved PBSC (Cryo Group) with 23 matched-pair allo-HSCT from fresh MUD PBSC (Fresh Group) performed in our center between January 2020 and July 2021. Results: No significant differences were recognized in clinical characteristics of patients, donors, and transplants between the Cryo and Fresh groups except for a better prognostic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) of the Cryo group. In the Cryo Group, the median time from apheresis to cryopreservation was 46.0 h (range 23.8−53.5), while the median time from cells collection and reinfusion was 13.9 days (range 5.8−28.1). In the Fresh Group, median time from apheresis to reinfusion was 35.6 h (range 21.4−51.2). The number of viable (7-AAD negative) CD34+ cells per kg patient infused was significantly lower in the Cryo Group (5.2 ± 1.9 × 106/kg vs. 7.0 ± 1.3 × 106/kg; p < 0.001). Indeed, there was a 36% (11−70) median loss of viable CD34+/kg cells after freezing. All patients engrafted: median time to neutrophil engraftment (>0.5 × 109/L) was 13.5 days (range 12−15) for Cryo Group and 14 days (range 13−16) days for Fresh Group (p = 0.522), while the median time to platelet engraftment (>20 × 109/L) was, respectively, 14 (range 12−18) and 15 (range 12−17) days (p = 0.904). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute GVHD was similar in the two groups (56.5% Cryo Group vs. 60.0% Fresh Group; p = 0.832) and no differences in terms of OS (p = 0.090), PFS (p = 0.200) and TRM (p = 0.970) were observed between the Cryo and Fresh groups. Conclusions: In our series, no differences between the Cryo and Fresh groups were found in engraftment, grade ≥ 2 acute GVHD incidence, OS, PFS, and TRM despite a lower CD34+ infused dose in the Cryo Group. Frozen PBSCs could be considered a safe option also for allo-HSCT from MUD but a higher amount of PBSC should be collected to warrant an adequate viable CD34+ post-thawing.

Effect of Cryopreservation in Unrelated Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Update from the Japan Marrow Donor Program

During the COVID-19 pandemic, donor grafts are frequently cryopreserved to ensure that a graft is available before starting a conditioning regimen. However, there have been conflicting reports on the effect of cryopreservation on transplantation outcomes. Also, the impact of cryopreservation may differ in bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT). In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical data of both cryopreserved unrelated BMTs (n = 235) and PBSCTs (n = 118) and compared these with data from a large control cohort without cryopreservation including 4133 BMTs and 720 PBSCTs. Among the patients with cryopreserved grafts, 10 BMT recipients (4.3%) and 3 PBSCT recipients (2.5%) did not achieve neutrophil engraftment after transplantation, including 4 of the former and all 3 of the latter who died early before engraftment. In a multivariate analysis, cryopreservation was not associated with neutrophil engraftment in BMT but significantly delayed neutrophil engraftment in PBSCT (hazard ratio [HR], .82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .69 to .97; P = .023). There was an interaction with borderline significance between cryopreservation and the stem cell source (P = .067). Platelet engraftment was delayed by cryopreservation after both BMT and PBSCT. Only 2 cryopreserved grafts (<1%) were unused during the study period. The cryopreservation of unrelated donor BM and PBSC grafts is associated with a slight delay in neutrophil and platelet engraftment but an acceptable rate of graft failure. PBSC grafts may be more sensitive to cryopreservation than BM grafts. Cryopreservation is a reasonable option during COVID-19 pandemic, provided that the apheresis and transplantation centers are adept at cryopreservation.

© 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Impact of Cryopreservation and Freeze-Thawing on Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells and Other Common Cellular Therapeutics

Purpose of Review

Cryopreservation and its associated freezing and thawing procedures–short “freeze-thawing”–are among the final steps in economically viable manufacturing and clinical application of diverse cellular therapeutics. Translation from preclinical proof-of-concept studies to larger clinical trials has indicated that these processes may potentially present an Achilles heel to optimal cell product safety and particularly efficacy in clinical trials and routine use.

Recent Findings

We review the current state of the literature on how cryopreservation of cellular therapies has evolved and how the application of this technique to different cell types is interlinked with their ability to engraft and function upon transfer in vivo, in particular for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), their progeny, and therapeutic cell products derived thereof. We also discuss pros and cons how this may differ for non-hematopoietic mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapeutics. We present different avenues that may be crucial for cell therapy optimization, both, for hematopoietic (e.g., effector, regulatory, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T and NK cell based products) and for non-hematopoietic products, such as MSCs and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), to achieve optimal viability, recovery, effective cell dose, and functionality of the cryorecovered cells.

Summary

Targeted research into optimizing the cryopreservation and freeze-thawing routines and the adjunct manufacturing process design may provide crucial advantages to increase both the safety and efficacy of cellular therapeutics in clinical use and to enable effective market deployment strategies to become economically viable and sustainable medicines.

Real-World Experience of Cryopreserved Allogeneic Hematopoietic Grafts during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Report

In response to the widespread COVID-19 pandemic, cryopreservation of allogeneic donor apheresis products was implemented to mitigate the challenges of donor availability and product transport. Although logistically beneficial, the impact of cryopreservation on clinical outcomes and graft composition remains unclear. In this study, we compared outcomes and graft composition with cryopreserved versus fresh allografts in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 30 consecutive patients who received cryopreserved allografts between March and August 2020 and 60 consecutive patients who received fresh allografts before the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary endpoints were hematopoietic engraftment and graft failure (GF), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In addition, extended immunophenotype analysis was performed on cryopreserved and prospectively collected fresh apheresis samples. Compared with recipients of fresh allografts, both neutrophil and platelet recovery were delayed in recipients of cryopreserved reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT, with a median time to engraftment of 24 days versus 18 days (P = .01) for neutrophils and 27 days versus 18 days (P = .069) for platelets. We observed primary GF in 4 of 30 patients in the cryopreserved cohort (13.3%) versus only 1 of 60 patients (1.7 %) in the fresh cohort (P = .03). Cryopreserved RIC allo-HCT was associated with significantly lower median total, myeloid, and T cell donor chimerism at 1 month. OS and RFS were inferior for cryopreserved graft recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 4.67) and HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.95 to 3.79, respectively. Using an extended immunophenotype analysis, we compared 14 samples from the cryopreserved cohort to 6 prospectively collected fresh apheresis donor samples. These analyses showed both a decrease in total cell viability and a significantly reduced absolute number of natural killer cells (CD3-CD56+) in the cryopreserved apheresis samples. In this single-institution study, we found delayed engraftment and a trend toward clinical inferiority of cryopreserved allografts compared with fresh allografts. Further evaluation of the use of cryopreserved allografts and their impact on clinical and laboratory outcomes is warranted.

Clinical features, pathophysiology, and therapy of poor graft function post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF), defined by the presence of multilineage cytopenias in the presence of 100% donor chimerism, is a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Inducers or potentiators of alloimmunity such as cytomegalovirus reactivation and graft-versus-host disease are associated with the development of PGF, however, more clinical studies are required to establish further risk factors and describe outcomes of PGF. The pathophysiology of PGF can be conceptualized as dysfunction related to the number or productivity of the stem cell compartment, defects in bone marrow microenvironment components such as mesenchymal stromal cells and endothelial cells, or immunological suppression of post-alloSCT hematopoiesis. Treatment strategies focused on improving stem cell number and function and microenvironment support of hematopoiesis have been attempted with variable success. There has been limited use of immune manipulation as a therapeutic strategy, but emerging therapies hold promise. This review details the current understanding of the causes of PGF and methods of treatment to provide a framework for clinicians managing this complex problem.

The new world: hematopoietic stem cell transplant during a pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) impacted every facet of hematopoietic cell transplantation. This article reviews the adjustments to recipient and donor care that occurred in response to this unprecedented event.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transplant centers modified algorithms, patient flow, education, and how we provided care. Our donor center partners reworked how donors were evaluated and products delivered to the transplant center. Our professional societies provided guidelines for patient and donor care and rapidly modified these based upon the never-ending stream of new data learned about SARS-CoV-2. Our research organizations provided rapid analyses to ensure the care modifications necessitated did not have a profound negative impact on our patients or donors.

SUMMARY

The efforts of transplant providers and donor centers worldwide allowed patients to receive the transplant needed with assurances that they were receiving the best care available despite the worldwide challenge.

Anti-thymocyte globulin and post-transplant cyclophosphamide predisposes to inferior outcome when using cryopreserved stem cell grafts

During 2020, the concurrent novel COVID-19 pandemic lead to widespread cryopreservation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant grafts based on National Marrow Donor Program and European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation recommendations, in order to secure grafts before the start of conditioning chemotherapy. We sought to examine the impact of this change in practice on patient outcomes. We analyzed the outcomes of 483 patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between August 2017 and August 2020, at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada, in the retrospective study, comparing the outcomes between those who received cryopreserved or fresh peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Overall compared with those who received fresh grafts (n = 348), patients who received cryopreserved grafts (n = 135) had reduced survival and GRFS, reduced incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), delay in neutrophil engraftment, and higher graft failure (GF), with no significant difference in relapse incidence or acute GvHD. However, recipients of cryopreserved matched-related donor HSCT showed significantly worse OS, NRM, GRFS compared with fresh grafts. Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort showed significant impact of cryopreservation on OS, relapse, cGvHD, GF, and GRFS. We conclude that cryopreservation was associated with inferior outcomes post-HSCT, possibly due to the combination of ATG and post-transplant cyclophosphamide impacting differential tolerance to cryopreservation on components of the stem cell graft; further studies are warranted to elucidate mechanisms for this observation.

Impact of Cryopreservation and Transit Times of Allogeneic Grafts on Hematopoietic and Immune Reconstitution

Recipients of cryopreserved PBSCs had lower T-cell chimerism, white blood cell count and T-cell reconstitution at days +30 and +100.

Greater age of product at infusion is linked with increased graft failure independent of cryopreservation.

We sought to evaluate the impact of cryopreservation of unrelated donor (URD) peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts on engraftment, chimerism, and immune reconstitution in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We reviewed stem cell product characteristics and clinical outcomes in 101 patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs from URDs between January 1, 2019 and 31 December, 2020, compared with 203 patients receiving fresh URD PBSCs. We observed no differences in 6-month overall survival, progression-free survival, or nonrelapse mortality. Patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs had delayed platelet engraftment and impaired reconstitution of white blood cells and T-cell subsets at day 30. Thirty-four percent of patients receiving cryopreserved grafts had CD3 chimerism <50% at day 30 after transplantation, compared with 14% of patients receiving fresh PBSCs (P = .0002). At day 100, this difference persisted (CD3⁺ chimerism <50%: 17% of cryopreserved cohort vs 6% of fresh cohort; P = .016). Greater product age at infusion was associated with increased graft failure, independent of cryopreservation. Receipt of grafts >48 hours old at time of cryopreservation or infusion significantly increased the risk of graft failure (subdistribution hazard ratio = 4.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-12.3; P = .0025). Our data indicate that cryopreservation is associated with similar overall short-term clinical outcomes compared with fresh PBSC. However, patients must be monitored closely for increased risk of other potentially adverse outcomes, including graft failure and poor immune recovery, particularly for grafts with older overall age at infusion. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine impact on relapse and survival.

Cryopreservation of Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cells from a Blood and Marrow Donor Bank During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey by the Japan Marrow Donor Program

During the COVID-19 pandemic, donor hematopoietic stem cell grafts are frequently cryopreserved to ensure the availability of graft before starting a conditioning regimen. However, the safety of cryopreservation has been controversial in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially for bone marrow (BM) grafts. In addition, in unrelated HSCT, the effect of the time from harvest to cryopreservation of donor grafts required for the transportation of donor graft has not been fully clarified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the first 112 patients with available data who underwent cryopreserved unrelated blood and marrow transplantation through the Japan Marrow Donor Program during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were 112 patients, including 83 who received BM grafts and 29 who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts. The median time from stem cell harvest to cryopreservation was 9.9 hours (range, 2.6 to 44.0 hours), and the median time from cryopreservation to infusion was 231.2 hours. The incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 after HSCT was 91.1%, and among 109 patients (excluding 3 patients with early death), all but 1 patient achieved neutrophil engraftment within 60 days after HSCT. The time to neutrophil engraftment and time to platelet engraftment were shorter in PBSC transplantation compared with BM transplantation (BMT), but the differences were not statistically significant (P = .064 and .18). Multivariate analysis among BM recipients revealed that a higher number of frozen nucleated cells and the absence of HLA mismatch were associated with faster neutrophil engraftment. The time to neutrophil engraftment after unrelated cryopreserved BMT was not different from that after unrelated BMT without cryopreservation. Our findings suggest that unrelated donor BM and PBSC grafts can be safely cryopreserved even after transit from the harvest center to the transplantation center. In the current COVID-19 pandemic, cryopreservation can be considered as an option while balancing the risks and benefits of the procedure.