1
|
Riggan KA, Ormond KE, Allyse MA, Close S. Evidence-based recommendations for delivering the diagnosis of X & Y chromosome multisomies in children, adolescents, and young adults: an integrative review. BMC Pediatr 2024; 24:263. [PMID: 38649921 PMCID: PMC11034074 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04723-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of supernumerary X & Y chromosome variations has increased following the implementation of genetic testing in pediatric practice. Empirical evidence suggests that the delivery of the diagnosis has a lasting impact on how affected individuals and their parents perceive and adapt to the diagnosis. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the literature to obtain useful recommendations for delivering a pediatric diagnosis of a sex chromosome multisomy (SCM) based upon a growing body of quantitative and qualitative literature on patient experiences. METHODS We conducted an integrative literature review using PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL employing keywords "genetic diagnosis delivery," "genetic diagnosis disclosure," "sex chromosome aneuploidy," "Klinefelter syndrome" or ""47, XXY," "Jacob syndrome" or "47, XYY," "Trisomy X," "Triple X" or "47, XXX," and "48 XXYY from January 1, 2000, to October 31, 2023. RESULTS Literature supports that patients and parents value the provision of up-to-date information and connection with supportive resources. Discussion of next steps of care, including relevant referrals, prevents perceptions of provider abandonment and commitment to ongoing support. Proactively addressing special concerns such as disclosing the diagnosis to their child, family, and community is also beneficial. Tables are provided for useful information resources, medical specialties that may be required to support patients, and common misconceptions that interfere with accurate information about the diagnosis. CONCLUSION Patient experiences suggest there should be heightened attention to diagnosis delivery, in reference to the broader ethical and social impacts of a SCM diagnosis. We present recommendations for optimal disclosure of a SCM diagnosis in early and late childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Riggan
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Health Ethics and Policy Lab, ETH-Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Megan A Allyse
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sharron Close
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, 1520 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ong CSB, Fok RW, Tan RCA, Fung SM, Sun S, Ngeow JYY. General practitioners' (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review. Fam Med Community Health 2022; 10:fmch-2021-001515. [PMID: 36450397 PMCID: PMC9717000 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The proliferation and growing demands of genetic testing are anticipated to revolutionise medical practice. As gatekeepers of healthcare systems, general practitioners (GPs) are expected to play a critical role in the provision of clinical genetic services. This paper aims to review existing literature on GPs' experience, attitudes and needs towards clinical genetic services. DESIGN A systematic mixed studies review of papers published between 2010 and 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA The inclusion criterion was peer-reviewed articles in English and related to GPs' experience, views and needs on any genetic testing. INFORMATION SOURCES The PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, EMBASE databases were searched using Mesh terms, Boolean and wildcards combinations to identify peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2022. Study quality was assessed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Only articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected. A thematic meta-synthesis was conducted on the final sample of selected articles to identify key themes. RESULTS A total of 62 articles were included in the review. Uncertainty over GPs' role in providing genetic services were attributed by the lack of confidence and time constraints and rarity of cases may further exacerbate their reluctance to shoulder an expanded role in clinical genetics. Although educational interventions were found to increasing GPs' knowledge and confidence to carry out genetic tasks, varied interest on genetic testing and preference for a shared care model with other genetic health professionals have resulted in minimal translation to clinical adoption. CONCLUSION This review highlights the need for deeper exploration of GPs' varied experience and attitudes towards clinical genetic services to better facilitate targeted intervention in the adoption of clinical genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Siow Bin Ong
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Rose Wai‑Yee Fok
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryo Chee Ann Tan
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Si Ming Fung
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shirley Sun
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Joanne Yuen Yie Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Venier RE, Grubs RE, Kessler E, Cooper KL, Bailey KM, Meade J. Evaluation of barriers to referral for cancer predisposition syndromes in pediatric oncology patients in the United States. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:901-911. [PMID: 35147246 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) are underdiagnosed in the pediatric population, though the diagnosis of a CPS has important implications for the child and their family. CPS are often diagnosed by geneticists or oncologists with expertise in CPS following a malignancy. This requires a member of the care team, most commonly, the treating oncologist to suspect a CPS and refer the patient for CPS assessment. An online survey was distributed to members of the Children's Oncology Group to elucidate current referral practices and barriers to referral for patients suspected to have a CPS. Of the 183 respondents, 86.1% was pediatric oncologists and most (68.5%) used formal guidelines to aid in assessment. Most respondents indicated they would rarely refer patients with tumors highly associated with CPS for genetic assessment. Participants were more likely to refer patients with malignancy and additional features of a CPS than for a specific type of cancer, despite the use of guidelines. Parent knowledge of family history was considered the most challenging barrier to obtaining a family history, though a thorough pedigree was not consistently elicited. Providers indicated the most significant barrier to referral for CPS assessment was priority given the patient's immediate care needs. Identification of these barriers provides direction to focus efforts to increase referrals. Provider education about CPS, clear referral guidelines, and implementation of or increased collaboration with a genetic counselor in the pediatric oncology clinic may encourage CPS assessment and enable oncologists to focus on the patient's immediate care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie E Venier
- Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robin E Grubs
- Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elena Kessler
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristine L Cooper
- Hillman Cancer Center, Biostatistics Facility, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kelly M Bailey
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Julia Meade
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Division of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doll B, De Castro MJ, Fries MH, Pock AR, Seibert D, Yang W. Precision Medicine-A Demand Signal for Genomics Education. Mil Med 2021; 187:40-46. [PMID: 34967402 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pressed by the accumulating knowledge in genomics and the proven success of the translation of cancer genomics to clinical practice in oncology, the Obama administration unveiled a $215 million commitment for the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) in 2016, a pioneering research effort to improve health and treat disease using a new model of patient-powered research. The objectives of the initiative include more effective treatments for cancer and other diseases, creation of a voluntary national research cohort, adherence to privacy protections for maintaining data sharing and use, modernization of the regulatory framework, and forging public-private partnerships to facilitate these objectives. Specifically, the DoD Military Health System joined other agencies to execute a comprehensive effort for PMI. Of the many challenges to consider that may contribute to the implementation of genomics-lack of familiarity and understanding, poor access to genomic medicine expertise, needs for extensive informatics and infrastructure to integrate genomic results, privacy and security, and policy development to address the unique requirements of military medical practice-we will focus on the need to establish education in genomics appropriate to the provider's responsibilities. Our hypothesis is that there is a growing urgency for the development of educational experiences, formal and informal, to enable clinicians to acquire competency in genomics commensurate with their level of practice. Several educational approaches, both in practice and in development, are presented to inform decision-makers and empower military providers to pursue courses of action that respond to this need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Doll
- Office of the Vice President for Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | | | - Melissa H Fries
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Arnyce R Pock
- E. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Diane Seibert
- Daniel K Inouye Graduate School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Wendy Yang
- E. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma Y, Cox L, Kruger L, Channamsetty V, Haga SB. Evaluating Primary Care Providers' Readiness for Delivering Genetic and Genomic Services to Underserved Populations. Public Health Genomics 2021; 25:1-10. [PMID: 34515218 DOI: 10.1159/000518415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased genomics knowledge and access are advancing precision medicine and care delivery. With the translation of precision medicine across health care, genetics and genomics will play a greater role in primary care services. Health disparities and inadequate representation of racial and ethnically diverse groups threaten equitable access for those historically underserved. Health provider awareness, knowledge, and perceived importance are important determinants of the utilization of genomic applications. METHODS We evaluated the readiness of primary care providers at a Federally Qualified Health Center, the Community Health Center, Inc. (CHCI) for delivering genetic and genomic testing to underserved populations. Online survey questions focused on providers' education and training in basic and clinical genetics, familiarity with current genetic tests, and needs for incorporating genetics and genomics into their current practice. RESULTS Fifty of 77 (65%) primary care providers responded to the survey. Less than half received any training in basic or clinical genetics (40%), were familiar with specific genetic tests (36%), or felt confident with collecting family health history (44%), and 70% believed patients would benefit from genetic testing. CONCLUSION Despite knowledge gaps, respondents recognized the value and need to bring these services to their patients, though would like more education on applying genetics and genomics into their practice, and more training about discussing risk factors associated with race or ethnicity. We provide further evidence of the need for educational resources and standardized guidelines for providers caring for underserved populations to optimize appropriate use and referral of genetic and genomic services and to reduce disparities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yashoda Sharma
- Weitzman Institute, Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Livia Cox
- Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lucie Kruger
- Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Veena Channamsetty
- Weitzman Institute, Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susanne B Haga
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Odgis JA, Gallagher KM, Suckiel SA, Donohue KE, Ramos MA, Kelly NR, Bertier G, Blackburn C, Brown K, Fielding L, Lopez J, Aguiniga KL, Maria E, Rodriguez JE, Sebastin M, Teitelman N, Watnick D, Yelton NM, Abhyankar A, Abul-Husn NS, Baum A, Bauman LJ, Beal JC, Bloom T, Cunningham-Rundles C, Diaz GA, Dolan S, Ferket BS, Jobanputra V, Kovatch P, McDonald TV, McGoldrick PE, Rhodes R, Rinke ML, Robinson M, Rubinstein A, Shulman LH, Stolte C, Wolf SM, Yozawitz E, Zinberg RE, Greally JM, Gelb BD, Horowitz CR, Wasserstein MP, Kenny EE. The NYCKidSeq project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse New York City children. Trials 2021; 22:56. [PMID: 33446240 PMCID: PMC7807444 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04953-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, genomics is informing clinical practice, but challenges remain for medical professionals lacking genetics expertise, and in access to and clinical utility of genomic testing for minority and underrepresented populations. The latter is a particularly pernicious problem due to the historical lack of inclusion of racially and ethnically diverse populations in genomic research and genomic medicine. A further challenge is the rapidly changing landscape of genetic tests and considerations of cost, interpretation, and diagnostic yield for emerging modalities like whole-genome sequencing. METHODS The NYCKidSeq project is a randomized controlled trial recruiting 1130 children and young adults predominantly from Harlem and the Bronx with suspected genetic disorders in three disease categories: neurologic, cardiovascular, and immunologic. Two clinical genetic tests will be performed for each participant, either proband, duo, or trio whole-genome sequencing (depending on sample availability) and proband targeted gene panels. Clinical utility, cost, and diagnostic yield of both testing modalities will be assessed. This study will evaluate the use of a novel, digital platform (GUÍA) to digitize the return of genomic results experience and improve participant understanding for English- and Spanish-speaking families. Surveys will collect data at three study visits: baseline (0 months), result disclosure visit (ROR1, + 3 months), and follow-up visit (ROR2, + 9 months). Outcomes will assess parental understanding of and attitudes toward receiving genomic results for their child and behavioral, psychological, and social impact of results. We will also conduct a pilot study to assess a digital tool called GenomeDiver designed to enhance communication between clinicians and genetic testing labs. We will evaluate GenomeDiver's ability to increase the diagnostic yield compared to standard practices, improve clinician's ability to perform targeted reverse phenotyping, and increase the efficiency of genetic testing lab personnel. DISCUSSION The NYCKidSeq project will contribute to the innovations and best practices in communicating genomic test results to diverse populations. This work will inform strategies for implementing genomic medicine in health systems serving diverse populations using methods that are clinically useful, technologically savvy, culturally sensitive, and ethically sound. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03738098 . Registered on November 13, 2018 Trial Sponsor: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Contact Name: Eimear Kenny, PhD (Principal Investigator) Address: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Pl., Box 1003, New York, NY 10029 Email: eimear.kenny@mssm.edu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline A Odgis
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine E Donohue
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle A Ramos
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole R Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bertier
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christina Blackburn
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Lena Fielding
- Molecular Diagnostics, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessenia Lopez
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Karla Lopez Aguiniga
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Estefany Maria
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jessica E Rodriguez
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monisha Sebastin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Nehama Teitelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Academic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Dana Watnick
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Academic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Nicole M Yelton
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Noura S Abul-Husn
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron Baum
- Department of Health System Design and Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Academic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jules C Beal
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical, New York, NY, USA
| | - Toby Bloom
- Molecular Diagnostics, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - George A Diaz
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Siobhan Dolan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health (Reproductive and Medical Genetics), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Bart S Ferket
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vaidehi Jobanputra
- Molecular Diagnostics, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia Kovatch
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Scientific Computing and Data Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas V McDonald
- Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Patricia E McGoldrick
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Pediatric Neurology, Boston Children's Health Physicians/Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Hawthorne, NY, USA
| | - Rosamond Rhodes
- Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael L Rinke
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Arye Rubinstein
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Lisa H Shulman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Christian Stolte
- Molecular Diagnostics, New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven M Wolf
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Pediatric Neurology, Boston Children's Health Physicians/Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Hawthorne, NY, USA
| | - Elissa Yozawitz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Isabelle Rapin Division of Child Neurology of the Saul R Korey Department of Neurology at Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Randi E Zinberg
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John M Greally
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The aim of this integrative review is to investigate current literature regarding family health history (FHH) taking practices, attitudes, and challenges in the pediatric outpatient setting. FHH is a known clinical tool for providers; however, there are no explicit standards for pediatric FHH collection. The integrative review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were searched for publications between January 2010 and December 2019, and 8 articles were selected for evaluation. Three themes are explored in this review: FHH collection practices, challenges, and tools. FHH collection practices were found to be inconsistent and the most commonly cited challenge was time. No validated FHH collection tools have been identified for the pediatric population. These findings suggest the need for standardization in FHH collection and further development of tools to improve FHH collection.
Collapse
|
8
|
Carroll JC, Allanson J, Morrison S, Miller FA, Wilson BJ, Permaul JA, Telner D. Informing Integration of Genomic Medicine Into Primary Care: An Assessment of Current Practice, Attitudes, and Desired Resources. Front Genet 2019; 10:1189. [PMID: 31824576 PMCID: PMC6882282 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Preparing primary care providers for genomic medicine (GM) first requires assessment of their educational needs in order to provide clear, purposeful direction and justify educational activities. More understanding is needed about primary care providers’ perspectives on their role in newer areas of GM and what resources would be helpful in practice. Our objective was to determine family physicians’ (FP) current involvement and confidence in GM, attitudes regarding its clinical value, suggestions for integration of GM into practice, and resources and education required. Methods: A self-complete anonymous questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 2,000 FPs in Ontario, Canada in September 2012. Results: Adjusted response rate was 26% (361/1,365), mean age was 51, and 53% were male. FPs reported many aspects of traditional GM as part of current practice (eliciting family history: 93%; deciding who to refer to genetics: 94%; but few reported confidence (44%, 32% respectively). Newer areas of GM were not part of most FPs’ current practice and confidence was low (pharmacogenetics: 28% part of practice, 5% confident; direct-to-consumer genetic testing: 14%/2%; whole genome sequencing: 8%/2%). Attitudes were mixed with 59% agreeing that GM would improve patient health outcomes, 41% seeing benefits to genetic testing, but only 36% agreeing it was their responsibility to incorporate GM into practice. Few could identify useful sources of genetic information (22%) or find information about genetic tests (21%). Educational resources participants anticipated would be useful included contact information for local genetics clinics (89%), summaries of genetic disorders (86%), and genetic referral (85%) and testing (86%) criteria. About 58% were interested in learning about new genetic technologies. Most (76%) wanted to learn through in-person teaching (lectures, seminars etc.), 66% wanted contact with a local genetic counselor to answer questions, and 59% were interested in a genetics education website. Conclusion: FPs lack confidence in GM skills needed for practice, particularly in emerging areas of GM. They see their role as making appropriate referrals, are somewhat optimistic about the contribution GM may make to patient care, but express caution about its current clinical benefits. There is a need for evidence-based educational resources integrated into primary care and improved communication with genetic specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June C Carroll
- Sinai Health System, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Judith Allanson
- Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shawna Morrison
- Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Fiona A Miller
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Joanne A Permaul
- Sinai Health System, Ray D Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deanna Telner
- South East Toronto Family Health Team, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tessier L, Brehaut JC, Potter BK, Chakraborty P, Carroll JC, Wilson BJ. Family History Taking in Pediatric Practice: A Qualitative Interview Study. Public Health Genomics 2019; 22:110-118. [PMID: 31661705 DOI: 10.1159/000503729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history (FH) is a risk factor for many conditions in pediatric practice. There is no standard of care regarding FH taking, and only a few published studies about current practice. OBJECTIVES To explore in depth pediatricians' perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding FH taking. METHODS The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to develop a comprehensive interview scheme. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pediatricians. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic approach and the constant comparison method. RESULTS Eleven pediatricians were interviewed. FH was found to be a firmly embedded, complex, and important aspect of pediatric practice. Participants described FH as part of regular holistic care. FH and social history were linked and often appeared to be part of the same concept to participants. FH was used for a range of purposes. In addition to risk assessment, FH information helped clarify diagnosis and select medication, tailor overall patient management based on family circumstance, and provide psychosocial support for parents. Participants expressed confidence in their FH skills and reported tailoring their approach with experience. Most were not concerned about formal evidence for FH and would not change their practice except for "good reason." CONCLUSIONS The use of the TDF helped ensure a comprehensive approach to FH taking in pediatric practice. The findings suggest that FH taking in this setting is a complex activity, embedded in routine care. Efforts to make FH taking more systematic may founder if they fail to take into account pediatricians' attitudes, perspectives, and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Tessier
- Newborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada,
| | - Jamie C Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth K Potter
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pranesh Chakraborty
- Newborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mazzola SE, O'Connor B, Yashar BM. Primary care physicians’ understanding and utilization of pediatric exome sequencing results. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1130-1138. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E. Mazzola
- Genomic Medicine Institute Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
- Department of Human Genetics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| | - Bridget O'Connor
- Division of Pediatric Genetics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| | - Beverly M. Yashar
- Department of Human Genetics University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheung FY, Pratt R, Shire A, Bigalke L, Ahmed Z, Zierhut H. Developing culturally informed genetic services for the Somali immigrants in Minnesota. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:887-896. [PMID: 31058411 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Misinformation and distrust often prevent individuals from minority communities to seek adequate healthcare, including genetic services. Immigrants appear to be further burdened by factors that negatively impact their health outcomes and little is known about their experience with genetic services. We sought to identify attitudes and perception of genetic services in one immigrant group, the Somali community of Minnesota and to establish a culturally informed framework for caring for members. A qualitative study comprised of 11 semi-structured key informant interviews was conducted and analyzed using a thematic approach. Main themes emerged from the analysis fell within one of four major topics: (a) Somali views and perspective on genetics and healthcare, (b) barriers to uptake of genetic services, (c) facilitators to uptake of genetic services, and (d) perspective on genetic service delivery subtypes. Somali views and perspective on genetics are often framed by religious and cultural values. These values, at times, conflicted with those common in the American healthcare system. Supports for different genetic service delivery subtypes also varied, ranging from little to no support in prenatal screening to generally positive support for pharmacogenetic testing. Future studies should prioritize topics with support and ways to better provide genetic counseling services within the Somali community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fook Yee Cheung
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Rebekah Pratt
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Abdirashid Shire
- Health and Research Institute for Somali Americans Inc. (HeRISA), Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lauren Bigalke
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Zahra Ahmed
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rubanovich CK, Cheung C, Torkamani A, Bloss CS. Physician Communication of Genomic Results in a Diagnostic Odyssey Case Series. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S44-S53. [PMID: 30600271 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasing in clinical care, and WGS is a promising tool in diagnostic odyssey cases. Physicians' ability to effectively communicate genomic information with patients, however, is unclear. In this multiperspective study, we assessed physicians' communication of patient genome sequencing information in a diagnostic odyssey case series. METHODS We evaluated physician communication of genome sequencing results in the context of an ongoing study of the utility of WGS for the diagnosis of rare and idiopathic diseases. A modified version of the Medical Communication Competence Scale was used to compare patients' ratings of their physicians' communication of general medical information to communication of genome sequencing information. Physician self-ratings were also compared with patient ratings. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, parents, and physicians across 11 diagnostic odyssey cases participated. In 6 of 11 cases (54%), the patient respondent rated the physician's communication of genome sequencing information as worse than that of general medical information. In 9 of 11 cases (82%), physician self-ratings of communication of genome sequencing information were worse than the patient respondent's rating. Identification of a diagnosis via WGS was positively associated with physician self-ratings (P = .021) but was not associated with patient respondent ratings (P = .959). CONCLUSIONS These findings reveal that even in diagnostic odyssey cases, in which genome sequencing may be clinically beneficial, physicians may not be well-equipped to communicate genomic information to patients. Future studies may benefit from multiperspective approaches to assessing and understanding physician-patient communication of genome-sequencing information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich
- San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Ali Torkamani
- Scripps Genomic Medicine Division, Scripps Translational Science Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA.,Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA; and
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zakinova A, Long-Boyle JR, French D, Croci R, Wilson L, Phillips KA, Kroetz DL, Shin J, Tamraz B. A Practical First Step Using Needs Assessment and a Survey Approach to Implementing a Clinical Pharmacogenomics Consult Service. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2018; 2:214-221. [PMID: 32391517 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Genetic-guided selection of non-oncologic medications is not commonly practiced in general, and at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Health, specifically. Understanding the unique position of clinicians with respect to clinical pharmacogenetics (PG) at a specific institution or practice is fundamental for implementing a successful PG consult service. Objectives To assess clinicians' current practices, needs, and interests with respect to clinical PG at UCSF Health, a large tertiary academic medical center. Methods A list of 42 target medications with clinical PG recommendations was complied. Clinical specialties that routinely used the target medications were identified. A 12-question survey focused on practice of PG for target medications was developed. Pharmacists and physicians were surveyed anonymously in several clinical specialties. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Of the 396 clinicians surveyed, 76 physicians and 59 pharmacists participated, resulting in 27% and 50% average response rates, respectively. The current use of PG in clinical practice for physicians and pharmacists was 29% and 32%, respectively, however this number varied across clinical specialties from 0% to 80%. Of clinicians whom reported they do not currently apply PG, 63% of physicians and 54% of pharmacists expressed interest in integrating PG. However, the level of interest varied from 20% to 100% across specialties. Of the respondents, 64% of physicians and 56% of pharmacists elected to provide contact information to investigators to further discuss their interest related to clinical PG. Conclusions While PG is not uniformly practiced at UCSF Health, there is considerable interest in utilizing PG by the respondents. Our approach was successful at identifying clinicians and services interested in PG for specific drug-gene pairs. This work has set a foundation for next steps to advance PG integration at UCSF Health. Clinicians can adopt our approach as preliminary work to build a clinical PG program at their institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Zakinova
- School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Janel R Long-Boyle
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Deborah French
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rhiannon Croci
- Department of Health Informatics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leslie Wilson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- UCSF Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Deanna L Kroetz
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jaekyu Shin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Bani Tamraz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sloand E, Bourguet AN, Engle-Pratt W, Bodurtha J. Striving for Precision: Enhancing Genetic Competency in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Students. J Nurs Educ 2018; 57:690-693. [PMID: 30388293 DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20181022-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research in genetics and genomics has led to the development of precision medicine, with health care increasingly individually based on one's genetic makeup. Implementation of genetics and genomics in primary care has been challenging given the rapid development of new advances. Clinicians report difficulties incorporating genetics and genomics in practice, citing insufficient knowledge, training, confidence, and resources for genetic diagnoses, testing, and result reporting. METHOD Three pediatric nurse practitioner students participated in elective clinical rotations in pediatric genetics, with the goals of approaching all patients with genetic thinking, gaining competence collecting family health histories, and understanding available genetic resources. RESULTS Postrotation, students gained genetic thinking skills, competence collecting a three-generational family health history to assess genetic risk factors and aid in genetic diagnosis, and the ability to navigate genetic resources. CONCLUSION Genetics clinical rotations during primary care nurse practitioner education is an effective strategy to learn genetic and genomic competencies. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(11):690-693.].
Collapse
|
15
|
Rubanovich CK, Cheung C, Mandel J, Bloss CS. Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States. Hum Mol Genet 2018; 27:R250-R258. [PMID: 29750248 PMCID: PMC6061688 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, genomic medicine education initiatives have surfaced across the spectrum of physician training in order to help address a gap in genomic medicine preparedness among physicians. The approaches are diverse and stem from the belief that 21st century physicians must be proficient in genomic medicine applications as they will be leaders in the precision medicine movement. We conducted a review of literature in genomic medicine education and training for medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing physicians with articles published between June 2015 and January 2018 to gain a picture of the current state of genomic medicine education with a focus on the United States. We found evidence of progress in the development of new and innovative educational programs and other resources aimed at increasing physician knowledge and readiness. Three overarching educational approach themes emerged, including immersive and experiential learning; interdisciplinary and interprofessional education; and electronic- and web-based approaches. This review is not exhaustive, nevertheless, it may inform future directions and improvements for genomic medicine education. Important next-steps include: (i) identifying and studying ways to best implement low-cost dissemination of genomic information; (ii) emphasizing genomic medicine education program evaluation and (iii) incorporating interprofessional and interdisciplinary initiatives. Genomic medicine education and training will become more and more relevant in the years to come as physicians increasingly interact with genomic and other precision medicine technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich
- San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia Cheung
- The Qualcomm Institute of Calit2, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jess Mandel
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- The Qualcomm Institute of Calit2, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wilcox RL, Adem PV, Afshinnekoo E, Atkinson JB, Burke LW, Cheung H, Dasgupta S, DeLaGarza J, Joseph L, LeGallo R, Lew M, Lockwood CM, Meiss A, Norman J, Markwood P, Rizvi H, Shane-Carson KP, Sobel ME, Suarez E, Tafe LJ, Wang J, Haspel RL. The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era. Per Med 2018; 15:199-208. [PMID: 29843583 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Genomic medicine is transforming patient care. However, the speed of development has left a knowledge gap between discovery and effective implementation into clinical practice. Since 2010, the Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group has found success in building a rigorous genomics curriculum with implementation tools aimed at pathology residents in postgraduate training years 1-4. Based on the TRIG model, the interprofessional Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Working Group was formed. Under the aegis of the Undergraduate Medical Educators Section of the Association of Pathology Chairs and representation from nine additional professional societies, UTRIG's collaborative goal is building medical student genomic literacy through development of a ready-to-use genomics curriculum. Key elements to the UTRIG curriculum are expert consensus-driven objectives, active learning methods, rigorous assessment and integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Wilcox
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA
| | - Patricia V Adem
- Department of Pathology, New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Ebrahim Afshinnekoo
- Department of Pathology, New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - James B Atkinson
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Leah W Burke
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA
| | - Hoiwan Cheung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Shoumita Dasgupta
- Department of Medicine, Biomedical Genetics Section, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Julia DeLaGarza
- Department of Pathology, New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Loren Joseph
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Robin LeGallo
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Madelyn Lew
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Alice Meiss
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | | | | | - Hasan Rizvi
- Institue of Health Sciences Education, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 2AD, UK
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Mark E Sobel
- American Society for Investigative Pathology, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Eric Suarez
- Pathology Department, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - Laura J Tafe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH/Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Richard L Haspel
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tarini BA, Gornick MC, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Saal HM, Edmondson L, Uhlmann WR. Family History Collection Practices: National Survey of Pediatric Primary Care Providers. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2018; 57:537-546. [PMID: 29034736 DOI: 10.1177/0009922817733693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
While family history (FH) collection is a core responsibility of pediatric primary care providers (PCPs), few details about this practice are known. We surveyed a random national sample of 1200 pediatricians and family medicine physicians about FH collection practices. A total of 86% of respondents (n = 289 pediatricians; n = 152 family medicine physicians) indicated that they collect a FH "always" or "most of the time" with 77% reporting collection at the first visit, regardless of whether it is a health maintenance or problem-focused visit. Less than half ask about relatives other than parents, siblings, or grandparents (36.3%). Among respondents, 42% routinely update the FH at every health maintenance visit while 6% updated FH at every visit. Pediatric PCPs use a variety of methods to collect a FH that is limited in scope and variably updated. Our results suggest that interventions are needed to help pediatric PCPs collect a systematic, efficient, and updated FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Howard M Saal
- 3 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,4 University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tremblay I, Janvier A, Laberge AM. Paediatricians underuse recommended genetic tests in children with global developmental delay. Paediatr Child Health 2018; 23:e156-e162. [PMID: 30842697 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxy033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess paediatricians' use of genetic testing for children with global developmental delay (GDD). Study Design We developed and piloted a questionnaire assessing the use of genetic tests in children with GDD and awareness of relevant guidelines. All practicing Quebec paediatricians were contacted. Paediatricians who did not evaluate children with GDD in their practice were excluded. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed with SPSS. Results Of the 651 paediatricians, 225 answered (34.5%) and 141 were eligible. Only 31.9% were familiar with at least one guideline about genetic tests for the investigation of children with GDD, but 93.6% had ordered genetic testing for children with GDD (Fragile X testing [92.9%], karyotype [87.2%] and chromosomal microarray [63.8%]). Based on vignettes, 20.6% of participants would order genetic tests for isolated GDD and 95.0% for GDD with dysmorphic features and microcephaly. Only 56.7% ordered Fragile X testing for a girl with GDD and a known family history of Fragile X syndrome. Use of tests for isolated GDD was increased in presence of maternal pregnancy, compared with absence of pregnancy (44.7% and 27.7%, respectively). More participants would order genetic tests for a child with GDD and fetal exposure to alcohol (69.5%) than isolated GDD (20.6%). Conclusions Even though paediatricians often order genetic testing for children with GDD, practices and knowledge regarding testing are not optimal. As new and more complex genetic tests are developed, up-to-date training about the use of genetic tests for children with GDD needs to be integrated into paediatrics residency programs and continuous medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Tremblay
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Division of Psychology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec.,Unité d'éthique Clinique, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Annie Janvier
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Unité d'éthique Clinique, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec.,Division of Neonatology, Unité de soins palliatifs, Unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec.,Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec.,Division of Medical Genetics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zahed H, Sparks TN, Li B, Alsadah A, Shieh JTC. Potential Role of Genomic Sequencing in the Early Diagnosis of Treatable Genetic Conditions. J Pediatr 2017; 189:222-226.e1. [PMID: 28947054 PMCID: PMC6037534 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
We present cases of 3 children diagnosed with the same genetic condition, Gitelman syndrome, at different stages using various genetic methods: panel testing, targeted single gene sequencing, and exome sequencing. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method and review the potential of genomic sequencing for early disease detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hengameh Zahed
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Teresa N. Sparks
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ben Li
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adnan Alsadah
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joseph T. C. Shieh
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
,Institute for Human Genetics, Benioff Children’s Hospital San Francisco, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wilkes MS, Day FC, Fancher TL, McDermott H, Lehman E, Bell RA, Green MJ. Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2017; 17:163. [PMID: 28903733 PMCID: PMC5598050 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0982-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening and counseling for genetic conditions is an increasingly important part of primary care practice, particularly given the paucity of genetic counselors in the United States. However, primary care physicians (PCPs) often have an inadequate understanding of evidence-based screening; communication approaches that encourage shared decision-making; ethical, legal, and social implication (ELSI) issues related to screening for genetic mutations; and the basics of clinical genetics. This study explored whether an interactive, web-based genetics curriculum directed at PCPs in non-academic primary care settings was superior at changing practice knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors when compared to a traditional educational approach, particularly when discussing common genetic conditions. METHODS One hundred twenty one PCPs in California and Pennsylvania physician practices were randomized to either an Intervention Group (IG) or Control Group (CG). IG physicians completed a 6 h interactive web-based curriculum covering communication skills, basics of genetic testing, risk assessment, ELSI issues and practice behaviors. CG physicians were provided with a traditional approach to Continuing Medical Education (CME) (clinical review articles) offering equivalent information. RESULTS PCPs in the Intervention Group showed greater increases in knowledge compared to the Control Group. Intervention PCPs were also more satisfied with the educational materials, and more confident in their genetics knowledge and skills compared to those receiving traditional CME materials. Intervention PCPs felt that the web-based curriculum covered medical management, genetics, and ELSI issues significantly better than did the Control Group, and in comparison with traditional curricula. The Intervention Group felt the online tools offered several advantages, and engaged in better shared decision making with standardized patients, however, there was no difference in behavior change between groups with regard to increases in ELSI discussions between PCPs and patients. CONCLUSION While our intervention was deemed more enjoyable, demonstrated significant factual learning and retention, and increased shared decision making practices, there were few differences in behavior changes around ELSI discussions. Unfortunately, barriers to implementing behavior change in clinical genetics is not unique to our intervention. Perhaps the missing element is that busy physicians need systems-level support to engage in meaningful discussions around genetics issues. The next step in promoting active engagement between doctors and patients may be to put into place the tools needed for PCPs to easily access the materials they need at the point-of-care to engage in joint discussions around clinical genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Wilkes
- School of Medicine, Office of the Dean, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
| | - Frank C Day
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Tonya L Fancher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Haley McDermott
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Erik Lehman
- Departments of Humanities and Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| | - Robert A Bell
- Department of Communication, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Michael J Green
- Departments of Humanities and Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lim Q, McGill BC, Quinn VF, Tucker KM, Mizrahi D, Patenaude AF, Warby M, Cohn RJ, Wakefield CE. Parents' attitudes toward genetic testing of children for health conditions: A systematic review. Clin Genet 2017; 92:569-578. [PMID: 28170090 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This review assessed parents' attitudes toward childhood genetic testing for health conditions, with a focus on perceived advantages and disadvantages. We also evaluated the factors that influence parents' attitudes toward childhood genetic testing. We searched Medline, Medline In-Process, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts and CINAHL. We screened 945 abstracts and identified 21 studies representing the views of 3934 parents. Parents reported largely positive attitudes toward childhood genetic testing across different genetic tests with varying medical utility. Parents perceived a range of advantages and disadvantages of childhood genetic testing. Childhood genetic testing was viewed by most as beneficial. Parents' education level, genetic status, sex and sociodemographic status were associated with reported attitudes. This yielded some conflicting findings, indicating the need for further research. Genetic counseling remains essential to support this population in making well-informed decisions. Targeted interventions tailored to specific families with different sociodemographic characteristics may be useful. Further research on the long-term impact of childhood genetic testing on families is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Lim
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - B C McGill
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Behavioral Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - V F Quinn
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Behavioral Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - K M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Mizrahi
- Behavioral Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - A F Patenaude
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - M Warby
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - R J Cohn
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - C E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Behavioral Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saul RA, Trotter T, Sease K, Tarini B. Survey of family history taking and genetic testing in pediatric practice. J Community Genet 2017; 8:109-115. [PMID: 28064391 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0291-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Family health history collection and genetic testing are core elements for the successful translation of genomics into primary care practice. Yet, little is known about how pediatric providers implement these elements in practice. We surveyed the membership of the American Academy of Pediatrics regarding family health history (FHH) collection and genetic testing in the primary care setting. Three hundred forty-nine (349) responses were analyzed with the initial response rate of 43.3%. Four principal findings were noted-(1) family health history is still recognized as a critical part of the medical evaluation; (2) perceived obstacles for FHH are time in obtaining the FHH and concerns about the family's knowledge of their FHH; (3) a 3-generation family history is out of the scope of routine care and alternate methods should be considered; (4) most primary care providers (PCPs) do not feel comfortable ordering, interpreting, and counseling regarding current genetic testing. Expanded genetic/genomic education at multiple levels (undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, and maintenance of certification) is clearly indicated to allow PCPs to integrate these vital elements into a current evaluation (acute care or health maintenance) in the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Saul
- Center for Pediatric Medicine, Children's Hospital, Greenville Health System, 20 Medical Ridge Drive, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.
| | | | - Kerry Sease
- Center for Pediatric Medicine, Children's Hospital, Greenville Health System, 20 Medical Ridge Drive, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA
| | - Beth Tarini
- Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Paneque M, Turchetti D, Jackson L, Lunt P, Houwink E, Skirton H. A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:89. [PMID: 27445117 PMCID: PMC4957387 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack knowledge of genetics and genetic testing relevant for daily practice and feel inadequate to deliver genetic services. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate genetics educational interventions in the context of primary care. METHODS Following the process for systematic reviews developed by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, we conducted a search of five relevant electronic databases. Primary research papers were eligible for inclusion if they included data on outcomes of interventions regarding genetics education for primary care practitioners. The results from each paper were coded and grouped under themes. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the review. The five major themes identified inductively (post hoc) were: prior experience, changes in confidence, changes in knowledge, changes in practice, satisfaction and feedback. In five of the studies, knowledge of practitioners was improved following the educational programmes, but this tended to be in specific topic areas, while practitioner confidence improved in six studies. However, there was little apparent change to practice. CONCLUSIONS There are insufficient studies of relevant quality to inform educational interventions in genetics for primary care practitioners. Educational initiatives should be assessed using changes in practice, as well as in confidence and knowledge, to determine if they are effective in causing significant changes in practice in genetic risk assessment and appropriate management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Paneque
- />i3S Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- />IBMC – Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, UnIGENe and Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics (CGPP), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Daniela Turchetti
- />Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Leigh Jackson
- />Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA UK
| | - Peter Lunt
- />Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA UK
| | - Elisa Houwink
- />Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- />Department of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Heather Skirton
- />Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Disco M. Lessons from Freelancing, Lighting Design to Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:681-6. [PMID: 27040826 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9952-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Theatrical lighting design and genetic counseling may seem like antipodal career choices. The former was chosen from a belief in the dynamism of the theatrical experience, as well as love of the actual work. As I grew older, the powerful personal experiences of a life encompassing miscarriages, the birth of a child with a genetic disorder, and breast cancer profoundly directed my choice of a new career; one that I also love. Clearly, the day-to-day work is very different. However, people in both professions strive to create a transformative space for their respective public. Rather than being left behind, lessons learned by working as a freelancer have served as a source of inspiration as I have matured into my new career. Three specific strategies, supported by literature on career models, have been paramount. First, keeping an eye on the big picture encourages awareness of where the field of genetics and the genetic counseling job market are headed. That awareness leads to the advocacy necessary to achieve the outcomes genetic counselors want. Second, striving for continual personal growth keeps genetic counselors engaged and personally ready for professional changes. Third, networking provides the connections to make clinical and advocacy efforts successful, in addition to essential social support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Disco
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 3415 Bainbridge Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rinke ML, Driscoll A, Mikat-Stevens N, Healy J, Colantuoni E, Elias AF, Pletcher BA, Gubernick RS, Larson I, Chung WK, Tarini BA. A Quality Improvement Collaborative to Improve Pediatric Primary Care Genetic Services. Pediatrics 2016; 137:e20143874. [PMID: 26823539 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate if a national pediatric primary care quality improvement collaborative (QIC) could improve and sustain adherence with process measures related to diagnosis and management of children with genetic disorders. METHODS Thirteen practices in 11 states from the American Academy of Pediatrics' Quality Improvement Innovation Networks participated in a 6-month QIC that included regular educational opportunities, access to genetic professionals, and performance feedback. The QIC identified 11 aims related to improving diagnosis and management of children with genetic disorders. The practices evaluated adherence by reviewing patient records at baseline, monthly for 6 months (active improvement period), and then once 6 months after the QIC's conclusion to check for sustainability. Random intercept binomial regression models with practice level random intercepts were used to compare adherence over time for each aim. RESULTS During the active improvement period, statistically significant improvements in adherence were observed for 4 of the 7 aims achieving minimal data submission levels. For example, adherence improved for family histories created/maintained at health supervision visits documenting all components of the family history (6% vs 60%, P < .001), and for patients with specific genetic disorders who received recommended care (58% vs 85%, P < .001). All 4 of these aims also demonstrated statistically significant improvements during the sustainability period. CONCLUSIONS A national QIC reveals promise in improving and sustaining adherence with process measures related to the diagnosis and management of genetic disorders. Future research should focus on patient outcome measures and the optimal number of aims to pursue in QICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Rinke
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York;
| | - Amy Driscoll
- Peakview Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health, Greely, Colorado
| | | | - Jill Healy
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois
| | - Elizabeth Colantuoni
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abdallah F Elias
- Department of Medical Genetics, Shodair Children's Hospital, Helena, Montana
| | | | | | - Ingrid Larson
- Department of General Academic Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, New York; and
| | - Beth A Tarini
- Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Burke LW. Disclosure of Genome Sequencing Results: Are Pediatricians Ready? Pediatrics 2015; 136:e1005-6. [PMID: 26371190 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Leah W Burke
- The University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Syurina EV, Gerritsen AMJM, Hens K, Feron FJM. “What about FH of my child?” parents’ opinion on family history collection in preventive primary pediatric care. Per Med 2015; 12:327-337. [DOI: 10.2217/pme.15.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Family history (FH) in Preventive Primary Pediatric Care is to identify children at risk for complex diseases and provide personal preventive strategies. This study was to assess parents’ opinion on FH collection. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Among issues addressed were: former experiences with FH, knowledge about FH, family definition and sharing information about FH. Results: The importance of FH for participants depended on their knowledge, perceived family health status and former experiences. After insight into FH, parents shift to believing it to be important, but certain barriers exist in reporting FH. Conclusion: Parents suggest that the importance of FH should be more emphasized and more trusting relationship with Preventive Primary Pediatric Care should be invested in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena V Syurina
- Department of Social Medicine, School for Public Health & Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie JM Gerritsen
- Department of Social Medicine, School for Public Health & Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Kristien Hens
- Centre for Society & the Life Sciences (CSG), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans JM Feron
- Department of Social Medicine, School for Public Health & Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Plunkett-Rondeau J, Hyland K, Dasgupta S. Training future physicians in the era of genomic medicine: trends in undergraduate medical genetics education. Genet Med 2015; 17:927-34. [PMID: 25674779 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Advances in genomic technologies are transforming medical practice, necessitating the expertise of genomically-literate physicians. This study examined 2013-2014 trends in genetics curricula in US and Canadian medical schools to ascertain whether and how curricula are keeping pace with this rapid evolution. METHODS Medical genetics course directors received a 60-item electronic questionnaire covering curriculum design, assessment, remediation of failing grades, and inclusion of specific topics. RESULTS The response rate was 74%. Most schools teach the majority of genetics during the first 2 years, with an increase in the number of integrated curricula. Only 26% reported formal genetics teaching during years 3 and 4, and most respondents felt the amount of time spent on genetics was insufficient preparation for clinical practice. Most participants are using the Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics Core Curriculum(1) as a guide. Topics recently added include personalized medicine (21%) and direct-to-consumer testing (18%), whereas eugenics (17%), linkage analysis (16%), and evolutionary genetics (15%) have been recently eliminated. Remediation strategies were heterogeneous across institutions. CONCLUSION These findings provide an important update on how genetics and genomics is taught at US and Canadian medical schools. Continuous improvement of educational initiatives will aid in producing genomically-literate physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jevon Plunkett-Rondeau
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine Hyland
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shoumita Dasgupta
- Biomedical Genetics Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McLaughlin HM, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Christensen KD, Kohane IS, Krier J, Lane WJ, Lautenbach D, Lebo MS, Machini K, MacRae CA, Azzariti DR, Murray MF, Seidman CE, Vassy JL, Green RC, Rehm HL. A systematic approach to the reporting of medically relevant findings from whole genome sequencing. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2014; 15:134. [PMID: 25714468 PMCID: PMC4342199 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-014-0134-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background The MedSeq Project is a randomized clinical trial developing approaches to assess the impact of integrating genome sequencing into clinical medicine. To facilitate the return of results of potential medical relevance to physicians and patients participating in the MedSeq Project, we sought to develop a reporting approach for the effective communication of such findings. Methods Genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq platform. Variants were filtered, interpreted, and validated according to methods developed by the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine and consistent with current professional guidelines. The GeneInsight software suite, which is integrated with the Partners HealthCare electronic health record, was used for variant curation, report drafting, and delivery. Results We developed a concise 5–6 page Genome Report (GR) featuring a single-page summary of results of potential medical relevance with additional pages containing structured variant, gene, and disease information along with supporting evidence for reported variants and brief descriptions of associated diseases and clinical implications. The GR is formatted to provide a succinct summary of genomic findings, enabling physicians to take appropriate steps for disease diagnosis, prevention, and management in their patients. Conclusions Our experience highlights important considerations for the reporting of results of potential medical relevance and provides a framework for interpretation and reporting practices in clinical genome sequencing. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12881-014-0134-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|