Is there a future for biologics in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis?

Targeting Epithelium Dysfunction and Impaired Nasal Biofilms to Treat Immunological, Functional, and Structural Abnormalities of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) nasal polyps is a prevalent and heterogeneous disorder existing as a spectrum of clinical conditions with complex underlying pathomechanisms. CRS comprises a broad syndrome characterized by multiple immunological features involving complex interactions between the genes, the microbiome, host- and microbiota-derived exosomes, the epithelial barrier, and environmental and micromilieu exposures. The main pathophysiological feature is an epithelial barrier disruption, accompanied by microbiome alterations and unpredictable and multifactorial immunologic overreactions. Extrinsic pathogens and irritants interact with multiple epithelial receptors, which show distinct expression patterns, activate numerous signaling pathways, and lead to diverse antipathogen responses. CRSsNP is mainly characterized by fibrosis and mild inflammation and is often associated with Th1 or Th17 immunological profiles. CRSwNP appears to be associated with moderate or severe type 2 (T2) or Th2 eosinophilic inflammation. The diagnosis is based on clinical, endoscopic, and imaging findings. Possible CRS biomarkers from the peripheral blood, nasal secretions, tissue biopsies, and nasally exhaled air are studied to subgroup different CRS endotypes. The primary goal of CRS management is to maintain clinical control by nasal douching with isotonic or hypertonic saline solutions, administration of nasal and systemic steroids, antibiotics, biologic agents, or, in persistent and more severe cases, appropriate surgical procedures.

Improvement of Suspected Eosinophilic Otitis Media with Targeted Biologic Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the responses of suspected eosinophilic otitis media to treatment with or without a targeted biologic therapy against interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, or IL-13 signaling.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Subjects with type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), asthma, and otitis media who underwent treatment between 2005 and 2021.

INTERVENTION

Treatment with targeted biologic therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre- and posttreatment nasal endoscopy, ear examination, and audiologic evaluation.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-seven subjects with type 2 CRSwNP were treated between 2005 and 2021. Sixty-two had otitis media with pre- and posttreatment evaluation. Retrospective chart review assessed pre- and posttreatment exam findings, nasal endoscopy, audiometry, and tympanometry. Nineteen subjects received a biologic therapy, whereas 43 did not. Exam, endoscopy, and tympanometry were graded for severity and compared pre- and posttreatment. Subjective ear exam and tympanometry were significantly improved with biologic therapy (control = 0.05, biologic = 0.84, p = 9.3 × 10 -5 ; control = -0.1, biologic = 0.62, p = 0.0002). Conductive hearing loss as assessed by air-bone gaps did not change between groups (control = 1.2 dB better, biologic = 1.2 dB worse, p = 0.32). Nasal endoscopy findings improved with biologic therapy relative to the control group, although not statistically significant (control = 1.04, biologic = 1.36, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic therapies targeting interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-13 signaling are potential new treatments for eosinophilic otitis media. This is the largest study demonstrating improvement in subjects with suspected eosinophilic otitis media in response to biologic therapy, and immune modulation represents a novel treatment strategy for this challenging condition.

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED

Current treatment strategies for otologic symptoms in eosinophilic disease are not tremendously effective or durable, resulting in a need for improved treatment options.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

To determine if targeted biologic therapy, often used for eosinophilic asthma and type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, improves coexistent suspected eosinophilic otitis media.

DESIRED RESULT

Treatment of suspected eosinophilic otitis media with targeted biologic therapy will result in improvement of otologic symptoms with a durable response compared with current treatment options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

INDICATE IRB OR IACUC

Exempt. HUM00182703.

Differentiation of eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis on preoperative computed tomography using deep learning

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop deep learning (DL) models for differentiating between eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) and non-ECRS (NECRS) on preoperative CT.

DESIGN

Axial spiral CT images were pre-processed and used to build the dataset. Two semantic segmentation models based on U-net and Deeplabv3 were trained to segment the sinus area on CT images. All patient images were segmented using the better-performing segmentation model and used for training and testing of the transferred efficientnet_b0, resnet50, inception_resnet_v2, and Xception neural networks. Additionally, we evaluated the performances of the models trained using each image and each patient as a unit.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 878 chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (Hubei, China) between October 2016 to June 2021 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The precision of each model was assessed based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Further, we analyzed the confusion matrix and accuracy of each model.

RESULTS

The Dice coefficients of U-net and Deeplabv3 were 0.953 and 0.961, respectively. The average area under the curve and mean accuracy values of the four networks were 0.848 and 0.762 for models trained using a single image as a unit, while the corresponding values for models trained using each patient as a unit were 0.893 and 0.853, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining semantic segmentation with classification networks could effectively distinguish between patients with ECRS and those with NECRS based on preoperative sinus CT images. Furthermore, labeling each patient to build a dataset for classification may be more reliable than labeling each medical image.

TNFRSF13B/TACI Mutations in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) remains still inconclusive. Recent studies identified an increased expression of BAFF (a B cell-activating factor) and its receptor TACI (Transmembrane Activator and cAML Interactor) in nasal polyp samples, while TNFRSF13B/TACI mutations have been found in patients with benign lymphoproliferative disorders and primary antibody deficiencies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the possible contribution of TNFRSF13B/TACI mutations in CRSwNP pathogenesis.

METHODS

Forty-four (44) patients with CRSwNP (male/female: 33/11, mean age: 52.5 years, range: 16-83) were analyzed for TNFRSF13B/TACI mutations by PCR-sequencing.

RESULTS

No pathogenic TNFRSF13B/TACI mutations were identified in our cohort study of CRSwNP patients. We detected two common missense mutations (p.P251L and p.V220A), along with other common silent mutations and intronic polymorphisms in an identical prevalence to healthy control population.

CONCLUSION

TNFRSF13B/TACI mutations might not play a role in the pathogenesis of CRSwNP.

[Etiopathophysiological mechanism of systemic and local allergic sensitization in the development of chronic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis]

The persistence, development and exacerbation of chronic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis all involve sensitization to respiratory allergens. The allergic response in question is the IgE-mediated mechanism of rhinitis, which often leads to a complex of etiopathophysiological malfunctions in various organs and systems. For clinical classification and further management of patients, it is important not to miss the detection of both systemic allergic sensitization to aeroallergens (which is achieved by conducting skin prick test or detecting the allergen-specific immunoglobulin E in the blood) and local sensitization (which can be confirmed by conducting nasal provocation test or detecting the nasal-specific immunoglobulin E in nasal mucosa). Before a full examination is conducted and both systemic and local sensitization are ruled out, the diagnosis of non-allergic rhinitis and the management of a patient with non-allergic nasal inflammation may be premature.

The role of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitits with nasal polyposis

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) poses a significant healthcare challenge, with diminished quality of life for patients and high costs and resource utilization for disease management. The understanding of CRSwNP pathophysiology has progressed with identification of various inflammatory biomarkers and subsequent development of monoclonal antibodies that target the underlying mechanisms of inflammation.Areas covered: Omalizumab is a biologic agent for CRSwNP treatment that targets immunoglobulin (Ig)-E. The US FDA has approved the use of omalizumab as an add-on biologic therapy for nasal polyposis in December 2020. Two Phase III clinical trials, POLYP 1 and POLYP 2, have shown that omalizumab improves both subjective patient-reported outcomes and objective physician-evaluated metrics for CRSwNP. Ongoing studies are still exploring the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of biologics for CRSwNP.Expert opinion: Biologics will continue develop as a viable management option for CRSwNP. Omalizumab is regarded as a promising addition to current treatment strategies for refractory disease.

Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis in the Era of Biologics

Purpose of Review

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a phenotypic designation of the broader condition of chronic rhinosinusitis. The advent of targeted biologics has shown promise in targeting different aspects of the inflammatory pathway, yet there remains a lack of consensus on the correct timing and use of these medications. This review seeks to provide a concise update of the available literature on the pathophysiology of CRSwNP, the evolution and cost utility of biologics as it pertains to management of patients with CRSwNP, and evidence for each available biologic and its use in CRSwNP.

Recent Findings

There are two biologics with FDA approval for use in CRSwNP: dupilumab and omalizumab. Recent clinical trials of other biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammatory pathways have also demonstrated efficacy both in symptom scores and nasal polyp reduction. However, studies have questioned the cost utility of these medications compared to other interventions. Furthermore, timing of use with respect to other interventions including surgery remains challenging.

Safety review of current systemic treatments for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and future directions

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common condition characterized by inflammation of the nasal and sinus linings, rhinorrhea, nasal blockage, facial pain, and loss of sense of smell for longer than 12 weeks. CRS can occur with or without nasal polyps.Areas covered: First-line treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is long-term intranasal corticosteroids, which have few adverse events associated with their use, as second-generation intranasal corticosteroids having a bioavailability of <0.5%. Systemic corticosteroids are used when intranasal steroids fail to achieve symptom control. However, the repeated use of oral corticosteroids is associated with numerous adverse events and the benefit from a course of oral corticosteroids is lost within three to six months.Expert opinion: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed in nasal polyposis although there is also very little evidence for their use outside of acute infection. Macrolide antibiotics are also associated with a transient increase in the risk of arrhythmias. Biologics offer a steroid-sparing alternative to the treatment of severe nasal polyposis. They have shown to be relatively well tolerated in studies to date; however, studies suggest that there is no disease modifying effect and that any benefit is lost within weeks of finishing treatment.

Role of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis: State of the Art Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature regarding the role of biologics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Review, ClinicalTrials.gov.

REVIEW METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on clinical studies investigating the efficacy of emerging biologics in CRSwNP, with a focus on randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be promising evidence to support the safety and efficacy of biologics in CRSwNP with and without asthma for select patients. However, additional large-scale randomized studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine which patients would benefit the most from these novel systemic treatments.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis refractory to medical and surgical therapy remains a challenging clinical problem for otolaryngologists. However, emerging biologic therapies may offer a new therapeutic option for such patients with recalcitrant disease.

Assessing tissue transcription biomarkers of chronic rhinosinusitis: a comparison of sampling methodologies

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a spectrum of complex inflammatory conditions of the sinonasal mucosa. Identification of biomarkers that enable classification and improved delineation among CRS endotypes is of increasing interest. However, the extent to which less invasive sampling methods identify genuine tissue inflammatory patterns is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate mucosal swab and cytobrush sampling as less invasive proxies for tissue transcription levels of putative biomarkers of CRS.

METHODS

Expression levels of 21 biomarkers of interest were assessed via custom TaqMan array cards from mucosal biopsy, cytobrush, and swab samples, in 32 patients with CRS. Reported expression levels were compared between each of the 3 sample types within each patient.

RESULTS

Reported transcription levels from swab samples for IL33, MUC5AC, IL1RN, CXCL8 (IL-8), TNF, IFNG, IL5, OSM, IL1A, and IL17C, and cytobrush levels for IL33, MUC5AC, IL5RA, IL1RN, CXCL8 (IL-8), and IL5 were significantly different to tissue levels from matched biopsy samples.

CONCLUSION

Reported expression via swab and cytobrush sampling differed from patterns observed in matched tissue for 10 of 21 and 6 of 21 markers, respectively. Non-biopsy-based studies for these particular markers may therefore not adequately represent tissue inflammatory processes and should be interpreted with caution. Cytobrush samples largely tracked tissue patterns for the remaining target biomarkers. In these cases, cytobrush sampling appears to adequately reflect tissue patterns for several putative biomarkers of CRS, supporting their use in clinical and research settings as a less-invasive proxy for the assessment of mucosal tissue inflammatory transcription patterns.

Updates on current evidence for biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to present the most important recent developments concerning biologics as a therapeutic option for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

RECENT FINDINGS

mAb anti-IL-4 receptor α (Dupilumab) was recently approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with CRSwNP and four other biologics are under investigation, with promising preliminary results.

SUMMARY

CRS is a disease associated with a significant symptom burden and high-indirect costs. Despite recent advances in combined approaches, persistent symptoms or recurrences are not uncommon. Monoclonal antibodies, used mainly to treat asthma, have recently been shown to have a positive impact on controlling the symptoms of CRS and reducing the need for endoscopic sinus surgery. Dupilumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab and omalizumab are discussed and their mechanism of action, risk and current evidence on efficacy are presented. Preliminary studies show encouraging results with relatively few side effects. Once the high cost of such therapies is addressed, they could prove an important adjuvant therapy for patients with CRS. Large-scale clinical trials designed to evaluate them are called for.

Dupilumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) imparts a significant healthcare challenge, resulting in diminished quality of life for patients and high costs with resource utilization for disease management. Understanding of CRSwNP pathophysiology has progressively evolved and the identification of various inflammatory biomarkers has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies that target the underlying mechanisms of inflammation. Dupilumab, which targets IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, serves as a novel agent for CRSwNP treatment. Three clinical trials, NCT01920893, SINUS-24 and SINUS-52, have shown that dupilumab improves both subjective patient-reported outcomes and objective physician-evaluated metrics for CRSwNP. The favorable findings have resulted in approval by the US FDA in June 2019 as the first biologic therapy for CRSwNP.

Effect of Budesonide Added to Large-Volume, Low-pressure Saline Sinus Irrigation for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Recent studies suggest that budesonide added to saline nasal lavage can be an effective treatment for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Objective

To evaluate the incremental effect of adding budesonide to large-volume, low-pressure saline sinus irrigation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a quaternary care academic medical center between January 1, 2016, and February 16, 2017. A total of 80 adult patients with CRS were enrolled; 74 completed baseline assessments; and 61 remained in the trial to complete all analyses. Data analysis was conducted from March 2017 to August 2017.

Interventions

All study participants were provided with a sinus rinse kit including saline and identical-appearing capsules that contained either budesonide (treatment group) or lactose (control group). Patients were instructed to dissolve the capsules in the saline and use the resulting solution to irrigate both nasal cavities, using half the solution for each cavity, once daily for 30 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome measure was the change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, pretreatment to posttreatment, in the budesonide group compared with the control group. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported response to treatment, as measured with a modification of the Clinical Global Impressions scale, and endoscopic examination scored by the Lund-Kennedy grading system.

Results

Of the 74 participants who completed baseline assessments (37 in each study arm), mean (SD) age, 51 (14.7) years, 50 (68%) were women. Of the 61 who remained in the trial to complete all analyses, 29 were randomized to budesonide treatment, and 32 to saline alone. The average change in SNOT-22 scores was 20.7 points for those in the budesonide group and 13.6 points for those in the control group, for a mean difference of 7 points in favor of the budesonide group (95% CI, -2 to 16). A total of 23 participants (79%) in the budesonide group experienced a clinically meaningful reduction in their SNOT-22 scores compared with 19 (59%) in the control group, for a difference of 20% (95% CI, -2.5% to 42.5%). The average change in endoscopic scores was 3.4 points for the budesonide group and 2.7 points for the control group. There were no related adverse events.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study shows that budesonide in saline nasal lavage results in clinically meaningful benefits beyond the benefits of saline alone for patients with CRS. Given the imprecision in the treatment effect, further research is warranted to define the true effect of budesonide in saline nasal lavage.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02696850.

The use of biologics in children with allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis: Current updates

The therapeutic goals of the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are symptom relief, avoiding complications, and improving quality of life. In the treatment of AR and CRS, several limitations of currently prescribed medicines have been identified. Antihistamine administration (both oral and topical) together with intranasal corticosteroids bring relief to the majority of patients, but their dependency on the medications and a necessity to maintain strict compliance with regular medication regimes pose a challenge. Immunotherapeutic agents are an option in some patients, but polysensitized patients, the risk of anaphylaxis, and the need for daily administration for years are limiting it from becoming the main therapy modality. Immunotherapy in any form requires commitment by the patient, which renders adherence and compliance issues particularly relevant. The procedure involved are generally time-consuming and entail an associated risk of severe adverse reactions. The use of biologics could overcome the limitations of other therapeutic modalities. They could be used as a monotherapy or combined with pre-existing medications. The benefits of targeted therapy include less adverse effects and optimal efficacy. The aim of the present review was to investigate the collective literature to date pertaining to the role of biologics in managing children with AR and CRS.

In-office Placement of Mometasone Furoate Sinus Implants for Recurrent Nasal Polyps: A Pooled Analysis

Background

A mometasone furoate (MF) sinus implant (1350 mcg) was evaluated in 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 400 adults with nasal polyps (NP) who were candidates for revision endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS). We conducted a pooled analysis to evaluate the efficacy of MF implant in specific subgroups of NP patients.

Methods

Pooled data from 2 RCTs for 375 patients were analyzed across prespecified subjective and objective end points through day 90.

Results

At day 90, patients receiving implants and MF nasal spray (MFNS) experienced significant improvements in nasal obstruction/congestion (NO/C) score ( P = .0095), bilateral polyp grade (BPG, P = .0008), and ethmoid sinus obstruction ( P < .0001) compared to control using MFNS alone. Fewer treatment than control patients remained candidates for RESS (41.0% vs 69.3%, P < .0001). All subgroups experienced significant treatment effects, except NO/C in smokers ( P = .0509) and patients without altered smell ( P = .1873). Subgroups without asthma and with only 1 prior ESS experienced largest treatment effect on NO/C, and those with recent surgery <24 months and BPG >5 showed largest effect on endoscopic end points and RESS. Control patients with ESS <24 months were at 7 times highest risk for RESS ( P < .0001). One (0.4%) patient experienced implant-related serious adverse event (epistaxis).

Conclusion

On pooled analysis, MF implants with MFNS showed more favorable results than MFNS alone across several subjective and objective end points at day 90 and may play an important role in management of NP patients, especially those who have allergic rhinitis, expanded polyposis, altered smell, or had most recent ESS < 24 months.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Does Allergy Play a Role?

A few chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) variants have demonstrated a strong association with environmental allergy, including allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) and central compartment atopic disease (CCAD). However, the overall relationship between CRS and allergy remains poorly defined. The goal of this review is to evaluate the relationship between CRS and allergy with a focus on specific CRS variants.

Biologic Agents for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a complex inflammatory disorder, which is often recalcitrant to medical and surgical management. Recently, biologic agents have been studied as an adjunct treatment for this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of biologic agents for chronic rhinosinusitis patients by reviewing literature and clinical trials.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of literature and clinical trials-both recently completed and ongoing-was undertaken to examine up-to-date evidence of current biologic therapy and its role in chronic rhinosinusitis patients-including anti-IgE, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-13, and GATA-3 DNAzyme.

RESULTS

Specific biologic agents discussed include omalizumab, reslizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and Hgd40/SB010. Risks, side effects, and administration information are also reviewed. An algorithm for the use of biologics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is proposed.

CONCLUSION

These treatments have promising results and may prove to be an important adjunct for patients with recalcitrant sinus disease.

Pharmacological Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Current and Evolving Treatments

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory sinonasal condition with multiple etiologic factors that is associated with a vast economic cost. Treatment is most frequently pharmacologic and has centered on agents that ameliorate inflammation, decrease bacterial or pathogen load, and facilitate egress of mucus or purulence from the sinonasal cavity. Nasal saline irrigations, topical nasal steroids, certain antibiotics, and systemic steroids have shown some efficacy in the management of CRS. Recently, biologic therapeutics that target specific inflammatory pathways associated with subsets of CRS have been developed and evaluated. Early data evaluating these biologic treatments suggest a potential role in treating a subset of CRS with refractory, poorly controlled disease. Additional studies are necessary to identify which patients would benefit most from biologic therapies and to assess the cost of these therapies compared with the benefit they provide. This review describes the pathophysiology of CRS and summarizes both established and novel biologic pharmacologic treatments.

Non-surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps based on clinical-cytological grading: a precision medicine-based approach

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a common inflammatory disorder that strongly impacts patients' quality of life. CRSwNP is still a challenge for ENT specialists due to its unknown pathogenesis, difficult control and frequent relapse. We tested the hypothesis that a new standardised therapeutic approach based on individual clinical-cytological grading (CCG), may improve control of the disease and prevent the needing for surgery. We analysed 204 patients suffering from bilateral CRSwNP, 145 patients of whom regularly assumed therapy, respecting the planned check-up, and were considered cases; 59 patients were not assuming therapy as indicated and were considered as controls. After five years of standardised treatment, 15 of 145 (10.5%) improved endoscopic staging, 61 of 145 (42%) did not change their endoscopic staging, and 69 of 145 (47.5%) were worse. In the control group, 49 of 59 (83%) were worse by at least two stages (p < 0.05). Patients and controls were stratified basing on clinical and cytological grading as mild, moderate and severe. After patient stratification, in the mild group (n = 27) 92% patients had a constant trend, with no worsening and no need for surgery over a 5-year period, whereas in the mild CCG control group 1 of 59 (1.6%) required surgery (p < 0.05). In moderate GCC (n = 83), 44% of patients did not modify or improve endoscopic staging and 3.6% needed surgery, compared to 13.6% of controls with moderate GCC (p < 0.05). In severe CCG (n = 35), even though no patients achieved significant amelioration of endoscopic grading, 40% of patients were considered as "clinically controlled" and 5.7% of patients underwent surgery, but the percentage was significantly higher (49%) in the control group significant (p = 0.0000). Finally, statistical analyses revealed a clear trend that polyp size increased at a faster rate in the control group than in the treatment group and for each subgroup (low, moderate and severe). The present study suggests a new approach in the management of CRS according to clinical cytological grading that allows defining the grade of CRSwNP severity and to adapt the intensity of treatment. This approach limited the use of systemic corticosteroids to only moderate-severe CRSwNP with a low corticosteroid dosage in comparison with those previously suggested. Our protocol seems to improve the adherence by patients, control of disease and the need for surgery in the long-term.

A phase 3 trial of mometasone furoate sinus implants for chronic sinusitis with recurrent nasal polyps

Background

Topical intranasal corticosteroid sprays (INCSs) are standard treatment for nasal polyps (NPs), but their efficacy is reduced by poor patient compliance and impaired access of drug to the sinus mucosa. A corticosteroid‐eluting sinus implant was designed to address these limitations in patients with recurrent polyposis after sinus surgery by delivering 1350 μg of mometasone furoate (MF) directly to the ethmoid sinus mucosa over approximately 90 days.

Methods

A randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blind trial was undertaken in 300 adults with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with NPs (CRSwNP), who were candidates for repeat surgery. Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) and underwent in‐office bilateral placement of 2 implants or a sham procedure. All patients used the MF INCS 200 μg once daily. Co‐primary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline in nasal obstruction/congestion score and bilateral polyp grade, as determined by an independent panel based on centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review.

Results

Patients treated with implants experienced significant reductions in both nasal obstruction/congestion score (p = 0.0074) and bilateral polyp grade (p = 0.0073) compared to controls. At day 90, implants were also associated with significant reductions in 4 of 5 prespecified secondary endpoints compared to control: proportion of patients still indicated for repeat sinus surgery (p = 0.0004), percent ethmoid sinus obstruction (p = 0.0007), nasal obstruction/congestion (p = 0.0248), and decreased sense of smell (p = 0.0470), but not facial pain/pressure (p = 0.9130). One patient experienced an implant‐related serious adverse event (epistaxis).

Conclusion

Significant improvements over a range of subjective and objective endpoints, including a reduction in the need for sinus surgery by 61%, suggest that MF sinus implants may play an important role in management of recurrent NP.

Contemporary Pharmacotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are chronic conditions causing nasal inflammation. CRS is increasingly recognized as a chronic inflammatory process rather than a chronic infection. Although the primary initiating factors in CRS remain unclear, AR is driven by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to environmental allergens. Understanding the underlying inflammatory pathways and disease endotypes are driving innovation toward novel pharmacotherapies targeting critical mediators implicated in CRS and AR, including IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, IgE, and epithelial initiators IL-33 and TSLP. Extensive investigations are needed to determine the role, timing, predictive prognostic factors and long-term safety and efficacy of these agents.

A Review of Classification Schemes for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis Endotypes

Objective

The recent development of endotypes to categorize disease variants of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) reflects an evolving understanding of the various pathophysiologic and pathogenetic mechanisms that contribute to the clinical heterogeneity of CRS manifestations. This review highlights popular endotype‐based criteria used to define different CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) subtypes and further discusses the emerging therapeutic advances for each classificatory approach.

Data Sources

PubMed literature review.

Methods

A review of the current literature was conducted to determine present‐day uses of immunologic and molecular profiles in the CRSwNP disease spectrum to identify specific endotypes.

Results

Four distinct but overlapping classification schemes have emerged to define endotypes within the CRSwNP phenotype: 1) type 2 cytokine‐based approach, 2) eosinophil‐based approach, 3) immunoglobulin (Ig)E‐based approach, and 4) cysteinyl based approach. The identification of key inflammatory biomarkers related to these CRSwNP endotypes has broadened the classification of CRS beyond common phenotypic expressions. Furthermore, CRSwNP endotypes may improve the selection of CRSwNP patients who are suitable candidates for biomarker‐specific treatment options, such as anti‐interleukin‐5; anti‐IgE; and platelet‐directed therapies.

Conclusion

Chronic rhinosinusitis endotyping with key biomarker patterns of inflammation allows for improved diagnostic and potentially therapeutic classifications of CRSwNP variants.

Chronic rhinosinusitis: the rationale for current treatments

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a broad clinical syndrome linked by mucosal inflammation. Primary treatment modalities are corticosteroids and antibiotics with surgery an option for failures, but the level of supporting evidence is generally low. The primary reason is that CRS is a symptom complex and not a specific disease. Areas covered: The primary treatment modalities for CRS are corticosteroids, antibiotics and surgery. Corticosteroids, which have very broad anti-inflammatory properties, also have the strongest evidence for efficacy. Antibiotics are likely effective in a subpopulation of patients but the various phenotypes and endotypes that make up CRS have thus far been poorly defined. Early surgery as well as biologics may also be more efficacious and cost effective in some phenotypes as well. Expert commentary: A better understanding of the inflammatory pathways that drive CRS will permit investigators to separate patient groups. This will allow for clinical trials that target specific subpopulations and more personalized therapy for CRS patients in the future.