Anti-DNA topoisomerase II? autoantibodies in localized scleroderma

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

Autoantigen microarrays reveal myelin basic protein autoantibodies in morphea

BACKGROUND

Morphea is an autoimmune, sclerosing skin disorder. Despite the recent emphasis on immune dysregulation in morphea, the role of autoantibodies in morphea pathogenesis or utility as biomarkers are poorly defined.

METHODS

Autoantigen microarray was used to profile autoantibodies from the serum of participants from the Morphea in Adults and Children (MAC) cohort. Clinical and demographic features of morphea patients with myelin basic protein (MBP) autoantibodies were compared to those without. MBP immunohistochemistry staining was subsequently performed in morphea skin to assess for perineural inflammation in areas of staining. Immunofluorescence staining on mouse brain tissue was also performed using patient sera and mouse anti-myelin basic protein antibody to confirm the presence of MBP antibodies in patient sera.

RESULTS

Myelin basic protein autoantibodies were found in greater frequency in morphea (n = 50, 71.4%) compared to systemic sclerosis (n = 2, 6.7%) and healthy controls (n = 7, 20%). Patients with MBP antibodies reported pain at higher frequencies. Morphea skin biopsies, highlighted by immunohistochemistry, demonstrated increased perineural inflammation in areas of MBP expression. Immunofluorescence staining revealed an increased fluorescence signal in myelinated areas of mouse brain tissue (i.e. axons) when incubated with sera from MBP antibody-positive morphea patients compared to sera from MBP antibody-negative morphea patients. Epitope mapping revealed target epitopes for MBP autoantibodies in morphea are distinct from those reported in MS, and included fragments 11-30, 41-60, 51-70, and 91-110.

CONCLUSIONS

A molecular classification of morphea based on distinct autoantibody biosignatures may be used to differentially classify morphea. We have identified anti-MBP as a potential antibody associated with morphea due to its increased expression in morphea compared to healthy controls and systemic sclerosis patients.

Pediatric morphea state-of-the-art literature review: Reframing morphea as a systemic disease

Pediatric morphea is an inflammatory, fibrosing dermatologic disorder. Although morphea may be localized to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, differentiating it from systemic sclerosis, there is increasing evidence that morphea is a manifestation of a systemic inflammatory process, with the potential to involve many organ systems. Given the potential risk for irreversible sequelae, pediatric morphea should be treated early and aggressively. Long-term disease monitoring is essential.

Safety and Efficacy of B-Cell Depletion with Rituximab for the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Rationale: Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of PAH. B cells may contribute to SSc pathogenesis. Objectives: We investigated the safety and efficacy of B-cell depletion for SSc-PAH. Methods: In an NIH-sponsored, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial, 57 patients with SSc-PAH on stable-dose standard medical therapy received two infusions of 1,000 mg rituximab or placebo administered 2 weeks apart. The primary outcome measure was the change in 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included safety and invasive hemodynamics. We applied a machine learning approach to predict drug responsiveness. Measurements and Main Results: We randomized 57 subjects from 2010 to 2018. In the primary analysis, using data through Week 24, the adjusted mean change in 6MWD at 24 weeks favored the treatment arm but did not reach statistical significance (23.6 ± 11.1 m vs. 0.5 ± 9.7 m; P = 0.12). Although a negative study, when data through Week 48 were also considered, the estimated change in 6MWD at Week 24 was 25.5 ± 8.8 m for rituximab and 0.4 ± 7.4 m for placebo (P = 0.03). Rituximab treatment appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Low levels of RF (rheumatoid factor), IL-12, and IL-17 were sensitive and specific as favorable predictors of a rituximab response as measured by an improved 6MWD (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.88-0.95). Conclusions: B-cell depletion therapy is a potentially effective and safe adjuvant treatment for SSc-PAH. Future studies in these patients can confirm whether the identified biomarkers predict rituximab responsiveness. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrails.gov (NCT01086540).

European Dermatology Forum S1-guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present guideline focuses on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, current strategies in the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this guideline provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes of systemic sclerosis with diseases of the rheumatological spectrum.

A case of localized bullous scleroderma

Bullous scleroderma is a rare type of the focal form of the disease mainly affecting the skin and characterized by induration and sclerosis foci as well as subepidermal blisters containing a transparent matter. The article describes a case study of bullous scleroderma in an adult woman with localized skin eruptions in the area of the left breast, which were completely regressed after a standard therapy with the use of drugs having an effect on collagen synthesis.

Challenges and opportunities in treating inflammation associated with pulmonary hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory cells are present in the lungs from patients with many, if not all, forms of severe pulmonary hypertension.

AREAS COVERED

Historically the first inflammatory cell identified in the pulmonary vascular lesions was the mast cell. T and B lymphocytes, as well as macrophages, are present in and around the pulmonary arterioles and many patients have elevated blood levels of interleukin 1 and 6; some patients show elevated levels of leukotriene B4. An overlap between collagen-vascular disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and idiopathic PAH exists, yet only a few studies have been designed that evaluate the effect of anti-inflammatory treatments. Here we review the pertinent data that connect PAH and inflammation/autoimmune dysregulation and evaluate experimental models of severe PAH with an emphasis on the Sugen/athymic rat model of severe PAH. Expert commentary: We postulate that there are several inflammatory phenotypes and predict that there will be several anti-inflammatory treatment strategies for severe PAH.

Clinical and laboratory features of systemic sclerosis complicated with localized scleroderma

Localized scleroderma (LSc) primarily affects skin, whereas systemic sclerosis (SSc) affects skin and various internal organs. LSc and SSc are considered to be basically different diseases, and there is no transition between them. However, LSc and SSc have several common characteristics, including endothelial cell dysfunction, immune activation, and excess fibrosis of the skin, and there exist several SSc cases complicated with LSc during the course of SSc. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of SSc patients with LSc remain unclear. We investigated the clinical and laboratory features of 8 SSc patients with LSc among 220 SSc patients (3.6%). The types of LSc included plaque (5/8), guttate (2/8), and linear type (1/8). All cases were diagnosed as having SSc within 5 years before or after the appearance of LSc. In three cases of SSc with LSc (37.5%), LSc skin lesions preceded clinical symptoms of SSc. Young age, negative antinuclear antibody, and positive anti-RNA polymerase III antibody were significantly prevalent in SSc patients with LSc. The positivity of anticentromere antibody tended to be prevalent in SSc patients without LSc. No significant difference in the frequency of complications, such as interstitial lung disease, reflux esophagitis, and pulmonary artery hypertension, was observed. The awareness of these characteristic of SSc with LSc are essential to establish an early diagnosis and treatment.

Morphea in adults and children cohort III: nested case-control study--the clinical significance of autoantibodies in morphea

IMPORTANCE

Small studies have implicated the association of specific autoantibodies with morphea subtype or severity, but no large-scale studies have been conducted. This prospective case-control study confirmed the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and other autoantibodies in morphea but found they are of limited significance.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of ANAs, extractable nuclear antigens such as antihistone antibodies (AHAs), and anti-single-stranded DNA antibodies (ssDNA abs) in patients with morphea vs a healthy control population and their association with clinical measures of morphea severity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Nested case-control study, conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Study participants included individuals enrolled in the Morphea in Adults and Children (MAC) cohort and Scleroderma Family Registry and DNA Repository.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalence of ANAs, AHAs, ssDNA abs in patients with morphea vs matched controls and association of the presence of autoantibodies with clinical indicators of morphea severity.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ANAs, AHAs, and ssDNA abs in patients with morphea was 34%, 12%, and 8%, respectively. Antinuclear antibodies and AHAs, but not ssDNA abs, were present more frequently in cases than in controls. There was no difference in ANA prevalence among morphea subtypes. Among patients with linear morphea, the presence of autoantibodies was associated with clinical indicators of severe morphea including functional limitation (ssDNA ab, P = .005; and AHA, P = .006), extensive body surface area involvement (ssDNA ab, P = .01; and ANA, P = .005), and higher skin scores (ANA, P = .004). The presence of autoantibodies was not associated with clinical measures of morphea activity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our results demonstrate that ANAs and AHAs are more prevalent among patients with morphea but are of limited clinical utility except in linear morphea, where their presence, although infrequent, is associated with greater lesion burden and functional impairment.

Localized scleroderma

Localized scleroderma (also called morphea) is a term encompassing a spectrum of sclerotic autoimmune diseases that primarily affect the skin, but also might involve underlying structures such as the fat, fascia, muscle, and bones. Its exact pathogenesis is still unknown, but several trigger factors in genetically predisposed individuals might initially lead to an immunologically triggered release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, resulting in a profound dysregulation of the connective tissue metabolism and ultimately to induction of fibrosis. To date, there are no specific serological markers available for localized scleroderma. Within the last years, several validated clinical scores have been introduced as potential outcome measures for the disease. Given the rarity of localized scleroderma, only few evidence-based therapeutical treatment options exist. So far, the most robust data is available for ultraviolet A1 phototherapy in disease that is restricted to the skin, and methotrexate alone or in combination with systemic corticosteroids in more severe disease that additionally affects extracutaneous structures. This practical review summarizes relevant information on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical subtypes and classifications, differential diagnoses, clinical scores and outcome measures, and current treatment strategies of localized scleroderma.

B-cell-directed therapies for autoimmune disease

Approval of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in patients who fail to respond to anti-tumor-necrosis-factor agents has raised interest in B-cell-directed therapy for this disease. A number of direct and indirect modalities with distinct mechanisms of action are being investigated, including anti-CD20 and anti-CD22 therapies, and new approaches for blocking members of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family including B cell activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation ligand (APRIL), which are at late stages of clinical development. Clinical experience is most extensive with rituximab, and suggests that targeting 'autoimmune' memory B cells is a feasible approach for treating autoimmune disease. Although anti-CD20 therapy has only been approved for rheumatoid arthritis thus far, data suggest this approach could be valid for other autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, vasculitides, autoimmune cytopenias, and neurologic and dermatologic autoimmune diseases. Additional studies of direct and indirect B-cell-directed treatments are needed before we can draw conclusions as to the value of this approach in patients with various autoimmune diseases and whether more precisely defined techniques than these are required to target the complex humoral system effectively.

[Translational aspects on the role of B-cells in autoimmune diseases. "From bench to bedside" and "from bed to benchside"]

In recent years, new findings in immunology have been successfully converted to therapeutic principles, in particular for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthritides. The introduction of cytokine blockers in RA using tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors presented the first original therapy modalities in rheumatology, after proliferation-inhibiting drugs, such as methotrexate and cyclophosphamide, had been accepted in oncology. This advance was and is still being extended with the co-stimulation blockade using abatacept and IL-6 receptor inhibition. Anti-CD20 therapies are of particular importance, initially approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), this therapy modality has been approved in recent years for the treatment of RA following the failure of TNF-blockade. However, questions remain regarding the role of B cells in a number of autoimmune diseases, as well as the working principles of B-cell targeted therapy. In this context, close clinical observation of patients has yielded answers to and confirmation of basic scientific concepts.

Anti-topoisomerase I autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis of the skin, vascular abnormalities and activation of the immune system. The majority of SSc patients have autoantibodies against nuclear antigens. Among these antibodies against topoisomerase I (topo I) are frequently detected in sera of SSc patients. Since the discovery of these antibodies as immunoglobulins reacting with a 70 kDa nuclear protein (Scl-70), a massive body of clinical and experimental data has been generated. In this review we summarize accumulated evidence about anti-topo I autoantibodies in SSc, including results of epitope mapping studies and investigations on the possible pathogenic role of these antibodies.

Pediatric morphea (localized scleroderma): review of 136 patients

BACKGROUND

Morphea is an autoimmune inflammatory sclerosing disorder that may cause permanent functional disability and disfigurement.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the clinical features of morphea in a large pediatric cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 136 pediatric patients with morphea from one center, 1989 to 2006.

RESULTS

Most children showed linear morphea, with a disproportionately high number of Caucasian and female patients. Two patients with rapidly progressing generalized or extensive linear morphea and arthralgias developed restrictive pulmonary disease. Initial oral corticosteroid treatment and long-term methotrexate administration stabilized and/or led to disease improvement in most patients with aggressive disease.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective analysis, relatively small sample size, and risk of a selected referral population to the single site are limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest an increased prevalence of morphea in Caucasian girls, and support methotrexate as treatment for problematic forms. Visceral manifestations rarely occur; the presence of progressive problematic cutaneous disease and arthralgias should trigger closer patient monitoring.

Localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis: is there a connection?

Excess fibrosis of the skin is a clinical hallmark of both localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis. Localized scleroderma is generally thought to be a skin-limited disease whereas systemic sclerosis can have a wide range of internal organ involvement. Recent data suggest that a subset of patients with juvenile localized scleroderma can go on to develop systemic involvement of their disease. This raises the question of what the connection is, if any, between localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis.

B-cell targeting: a novel approach to immune intervention today and tomorrow

B cells and their products, antibodies, play an important role in the diagnosis and, in some instances, in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases. Specific B-cell directed therapies are of recent interest as their impact on B-cell activity can influence a variety of autoimmune diseases. The development and introduction of rituximab, a depleting antibody targeting CD20+ B cells, and previously CD52-directed treatment with Campath-1h for the treatment of B-cell malignancies as well as rheumatoid arthritis have pioneered this therapeutic field. Other non-depleting strategies employ CD22 or B-cell activating factor/B lymphocyte stimulator and apoptosis-inducing ligand as targets and are under clinical investigation at present. Abnormalities of B-cell subsets have been identified by a number of independent groups which often represent characteristic patterns of disturbances of the human B-cell repertoire. However, the clinical value of specific B-cell subset targeting/depletion has not been addressed extensively. As such an approach may afford the possibility to avoid unnecessary adverse events related to depletion of non-pathogenic B-cell populations, B-cell subset targeting may have the capacity to enhance the benefit/risk ratio of B-cell immune intervention.

Rituximab: applications in dermatology

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which has been used extensively for B-lymphocytic malignancies. In addition, applications for autoimmune diseases have emerged in recent years. Case reports support the use of rituximab in certain dermatologic conditions, including paraneoplastic pemphigus, pemphigus vulgaris, graft versus host disease, and cutaneous B-cell malignancies. Clinical trials are lacking and would be an appropriate next step.

Elevated serum BAFF levels in patients with localized scleroderma in contrast to other organ-specific autoimmune diseases

Serum levels of B-cell activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF), a potent B-cell survival factor, are elevated in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The objective of this study was to determine serum BAFF levels and relate the results to the clinical features in patients with organ-specific autoimmune diseases of the skin, such as localized scleroderma and autoimmune bullous diseases. Serum BAFF levels were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 44 patients with localized scleroderma, 20 with pemphigus vulgaris/pemphigus foliaceus, 20 with bullous pemphigoid and 30 healthy controls. Twenty patients with SSc and 20 with SLE were also examined as disease controls. Serum BAFF levels were elevated in localized scleroderma patients compared with healthy controls. Concerning localized scleroderma subgroups, patients with generalized morphea, the severest form of localized scleroderma, had higher serum BAFF levels than linear scleroderma or morphea patients. The BAFF levels of generalized morphea were comparable with those of SSc or SLE. Furthermore, serum BAFF levels correlated positively with antihistone antibody levels and the severity of skin lesion as well as the number of skin lesions. By contrast, serum BAFF levels were not significantly elevated in patients with pemphigus or pemphigoid. These results suggest that BAFF may be contributing to autoimmunity and disease development in localized scleroderma.

Localized scleroderma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Localized scleroderma, also known as morphoea, has a variety of clinical manifestations that can include systemic involvement. Early recognition, diagnosis and treatment may improve the long-term outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large multicentre study coordinated by the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society has yielded important information on the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of juvenile localized scleroderma, especially as it pertains to systemic manifestations. Previous results using methotrexate and corticosteroids have been confirmed. Studies on phototherapy have also demonstrated efficacy. A new immunomodulator, imiquimod, has shown promise in an initial case series.

SUMMARY

Studies over the past year highlight the wide range of extracutaneous manifestations and different forms of localized scleroderma and suggest that treatment may be beneficial.

Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions

During the past decade biologic therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins have revolutionized the management of rheumatic disease. By targeting key cytokines and immune cells biologics have provided more specific therapeutic interventions with less immunosuppression. Clinical use, however, has revealed that their theoretical simplicity hides a more complex reality. Efficacy, toxicity and even pharmacodynamic effects can deviate from those predicted, as poignantly illustrated by the catastrophic effects witnessed during the first-into-human administration of TGN1412. This review summarizes lessons gleaned from practical experience and discusses how these can inform future discovery and development of new biologic therapies for rheumatology.

Sclérodermies localisées ou morphées

DEFINITION AND FREQUENCY: Localized scleroderma, also known as morphea, is a sclerotic condition limited to the skin. The specific clinical entity depends on the extent, linear disposition and depth of the lesions. Morphea is ten times more prevalent than systemic sclerosis, and its prognosis is generally good: superficial forms resolve within 3 years.

NO SYSTEMIC INVOLVEMENT

In the absence of symptoms, examinations to detect systemic involvement are purposeless. Plaque morphea is the most frequent clinical presentation. Serious manifestations include extensive morphea that may involve the entire skin or linear forms, especially in children, where they may be severe, especially on the face. There are no immunological markers clearly associated with morphea and no causative agents have been implicated in its pathogenesis, although sclerodermiform dermatitis is reported to be associated with some drugs and toxic agents.

TREATMENT

There is no consensual treatment for morphea. Treatment should be decided according to severity and extent of lesions. Limited lesions may be treated with local steroids such as class IV corticosteroids. Systemic treatment (methotrexate) should be discussed in extensive and linear forms when there is a risk of functional or esthetic complications.

Systemic and localized scleroderma

Sclerosing conditions of the skin are manifested by a full spectrum of presentations that includes skin-limited forms as well as those which can involve internal organs and result in death. At this point, we are just beginning to understand the mechanisms of tissue fibrosis, and it is likely that the fibrotic processes are a heterogeneous group of disorders in which perturbation of multiple molecular pathways, including vascular and immunologically mediated pathways, can lead to fibrosis. We now have some moderately effective therapies for vascular aspects of systemic sclerosis (eg, bosentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension, calcium-channel blockers for Raynaud's, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for renal crisis). We also are beginning to find treatments interrupting the immunologic pathways that manifest as systemic sclerosis (eg, methotrexate for the skin or cyclophosphamide for the lungs). The basic process of fibrosis, however, awaits proven, effective therapy.

Anti-DNA topoisomerase II α autoantibodies in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis

The pathogenesis and etiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) remain unknown, but the presence of several autoantibodies is recognized as one of its prominent features. The clinical significance of anti-DNA topoisomerase II alpha antibody (anti-topo II alpha Ab) remains unknown in Japanese patients with SSc. To determine the prevalence and clinical correlation of anti-topo II alpha Ab in Japanese patients with SSc. Serum samples were obtained from 103 Japanese patients with SSc. Control serum samples were obtained from 43 healthy Japanese volunteers. Anti-topo II alpha Abs were determined by enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay.IgG anti-topo II alpha Ab levels were significantly increased in SSc patients (n=103) compared to normal controls (n=43; P<0.005). IgG or IgM anti-topo II alpha Ab was detected in 19% (20/103) of SSc patients when absorbance values higher than the mean+2SD of control serum samples were considered positive. By contrast, IgG or IgM anti-topo II alpha Ab was observed in only 7% (3/43) of healthy individuals. The presence of pulmonary fibrosis was more frequently detected in SSc patients with IgG anti-topo II alpha Ab than those without the Ab (P<0.05). Moreover, % DLco and % VC were significantly decreased in SSc patients with anti-topo II alpha Ab relative to those without the Ab (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively). The elevated levels of both erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were also more frequently observed in SSc patients positive for IgG anti-topo II alpha Ab (P<0.005). The results of the present study indicate that anti-topo II alpha Ab represent one of the autoantibody specificities detected on SSc patients and may be regarded a serological marker of pulmonary fibrosis in Japanese patients with SSc.

Classification of systemic sclerosis. Visions and reality

Systemic sclerosis, scleroderma (SSc) is a disabling condition that shortens life expectancy. Disease heterogeneity and difficulties separating SSc from SSc-like conditions make classification an important issue. Limited cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous SSc, with different severity and survival, have been recognized for several years as distinct subsets. Some authors have suggested an intermediate cutaneous form with intermediate survival. This issue remains unsettled, however. The technique of capillaroscopy is helpful as an adjunct diagnostic tool to separate idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon from SSc. Digitized video-capillaroscopy is developing as a powerful new method to assess individual capillaries over time. Using the simpler techniques of video-capillaroscopy, different patterns have been described and named 'early', 'active', 'late' and 'slow'. The value of nailfold video-capillaroscopy to distinguish different subsets or provide prognostic information for use in daily practice remains to be assessed. The features of CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud's, oesophagus dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasias) are not confined to single subsets of SSc. There is no convincing evidence of any advantage for distinguishing the limited, intermediate and diffuse forms of SSc rather than only the limited and diffuse forms.

Antinucleosome antibody is a major autoantibody in localized scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Localized scleroderma (LSc) exhibits autoimmunity, and antihistone antibody is frequently detected. The major antigens recognized by antihistone antibody are histones H1, H2A and H2B, which are located on the outer side of the nucleosome and are relatively more accessible for antibody binding. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that antihistone antibody is induced by nucleosome or native chromatin as immunogens in LSc.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether antinucleosome antibody is present in patients with LSc.

METHODS

Antinucleosome antibody, antihistone antibody and antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results IgG or IgM antinucleosome antibody was detected more frequently in patients with LSc than was antihistone antibody: in 40 of 49 (82%) vs. 26 of 49 (53%), respectively. No patients had anti-dsDNA antibody. The prevalence of antinucleosome antibody positivity was comparable in the three subgroups of LSc (generalized morphoea, 89%; linear scleroderma, 71%; morphoea, 90%). Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exhibited a similar frequency of antinucleosome antibody positivity (13 of 15, 87%), but their IgG levels of this autoantibody were much higher than those found in patients with LSc. By contrast, IgM antinucleosome antibody levels were normal in patients with SLE, while they were significantly increased in patients with LSc compared with normal controls. Antinucleosome antibody was also detected at lower frequency in patients with systemic sclerosis (five of 20, 25%) or dermatomyositis (five of 15, 33%). Nucleosome-restricted antibodies, i.e. antibodies that react with the whole nucleosome particle but not with its individual components (histones and dsDNA) were also present in 35% of patients with LSc.

CONCLUSIONS

Although antinucleosome antibody was not specific to LSc, its high prevalence in LSc indicates that antinucleosome antibody is a major autoantibody in this disease.

Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis and fibrosing syndromes: clinical indications and relevance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic sclerosis, or scleroderma, is associated with a variety of autoantibodies, each of them having their own clinical associations. The fibrosing disorders, other than systemic sclerosis, represent a diverse group of diseases with systemic or localized effect and with limited understanding of their pathogenesis. The purpose of this review is to analyze the literature on the clinical usefulness of examining serum autoantibodies in patients with known or suspected scleroderma and fibrosing disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies on autoantibodies within the past year highlight their clinical utility in systemic sclerosis. Anticentromere antibodies are most often seen with limited cutaneous involvement and lower frequency of pulmonary fibrosis and lower mortality (despite an increased risk for pulmonary hypertension) compared with anti-Scl-70 and antinucleolar antibodies. Anti-Scl-70 antibodies are associated with diffuse cutaneous involvement, increased frequency of pulmonary fibrosis, and higher mortality. The anti-polymyositis-scleroderma autoantibody is associated with the polymyositis-scleroderma overlap syndrome. Anti-Th/To antibodies are associated with milder skin and systemic involvement but with more severe pulmonary fibrosis and overall worse prognosis. Anti-RNA-polymerase family antibodies and antifibrillarin antibodies are predictive of diffuse cutaneous and systemic involvement and greater mortality. Less specific autoantibodies for systemic sclerosis and limited data on some other autoantibodies limit their clinical utility in patients with systemic sclerosis. For the most part, the association between autoantibodies and fibrosing disorders other than systemic sclerosis remains inconclusive.

SUMMARY

Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis provide important and prognostic information and are useful in defining clinical subsets of the disease. When used appropriately, they can be a useful instrument in the management of scleroderma.