What do self-administered joint counts tell us about patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Effect of Training on Patient Self-Assessment of Joint Counts in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Objective

Patient self‐assessed joint counts, if accurate and reliable, could potentially serve as a useful clinical assessment tool in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This systematic review examines the effect of patient training on the inter‐rater reliability of joint counts between patients and clinicians.

Methods

The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL for articles that incorporated patient training and measured the reliability of patient self‐assessed joint counts in RA. Articles were included if they reported on the inter‐rater reliability between patient and clinician joint counts in both trained and untrained patients with RA. Data were extracted on characteristics of patients, structure and components of the training interventions, joint count reliability of patients with and without training, and patient feedback on training interventions. The relevant data were summarized and described.

Results

Multiple training methods have been studied (n = 5), including in‐person sessions run by rheumatologists and instructional videos on the joint examination. Overall, training improved the reliability of patient self–joint counts, with more marked improvement in reliability of swollen joint counts than tender joint counts. Patients had positive feedback when surveyed on their experiences with training.

Conclusion

Various training modalities (in‐person and video‐based) may be effective at improving reliability of patient self–joint counts. More research is needed on this topic, with potential areas for future research including 1) comparison between the efficacy of different modalities of training, and 2) impact of patient factors (education level and disease severity) on the efficacy of training.

Swollen, but not tender joints, are independently associated with ultrasound synovitis: results from a longitudinal observational study of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Joint swelling and tenderness are considered a proxy for inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). With ultrasound-detected inflammation as reference, our objectives were to explore on patient and joint level the associations between ultrasound synovitis and joint swelling, tenderness and patient-reported joint pain (PRJP).

METHODS

209 patients with established RA were examined six times during 12 months with assessment of 32 joints in upper/lower extremities for joint swelling/tenderness and Grey scale (GS)/power Doppler (PD) synovitis. PRJP was assessed on a manikin. Correlations between different sum scores were at each examination calculated using Spearman's rho (r), agreement at joint level was examined by Cohen's kappa and logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between joint assessment and GS/PD scores.

RESULTS

At patient level, swollen joints were strongly correlated with GS/PD sum scores (r=0.64-0.88), while tender joints were primarily associated with PRJP (r=0.54-0.68). At joint level, GS/PD pathology had higher agreement with swelling (kappa 0.54-0.57) than tenderness (kappa 0.20-0.21) or PRJP (0.23-0.25). Higher percentages of joints were swollen according to increasing GS/PD scores, independently of joint tenderness. However, joints being tender, but not swollen, were not associated with GS/PD scores. Receiver operating curves showed swollen but not tender joints to be associated with GS/PD scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Swollen joints were strongly associated with ultrasound detected synovitis at both patient and joint level, while this association was not found for tender joints. These results may question if tender joints reflect ongoing inflammation in established RA.

Reliability of joint count assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Joint counts are central to the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but reliability is an issue.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the reliability and agreement of joint counts (intra-observer and inter-observer) by health care professionals (physicians, nurses, and metrologists) and patients in RA, and the impact of training and standardization on joint count reliability through a systematic literature review.

METHODS

Articles reporting joint count reliability or agreement in RA in PubMed, EMBase, and the Cochrane library between 1960 and 2012 were selected. Data were extracted regarding tender joint counts (TJCs) and swollen joint counts (SJCs) derived by physicians, metrologists, or patients for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. In addition, methods and effects of training or standardization were extracted. Statistics expressing reliability such as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were extracted. Data analysis was primarily descriptive due to high heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies on health care professionals (HCP) and 20 studies on patients were included. Intra-observer reliability for TJCs and SJCs was good for HCPs and patients (range of ICC: 0.49-0.98). Inter-observer reliability between HCPs for TJCs was higher than for SJCs (range of ICC: 0.64-0.88 vs. 0.29-0.98). Patient inter-observer reliability with HCPs as comparators was better for TJCs (range of ICC: 0.31-0.91) compared to SJCs (0.16-0.64). Nine studies (7 with HCPs and 2 with patients) evaluated consensus or training, with improvement in reliability of TJCs but conflicting evidence for SJCs.

CONCLUSION

Intra- and inter-observer reliability was high for TJCs for HCPs and patients: among all groups, reliability was better for TJCs than SJCs. Inter-observer reliability of SJCs was poorer for patients than HCPs. Data were inconclusive regarding the potential for training to improve SJC reliability. Overall, the results support further evaluation for patient-reported joint counts as an outcome measure.

Patient self-report RADAI (Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index) joint counts on an MDHAQ (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire) in usual care of consecutive patients with rheumatic diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze a patient self-report joint count from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) in a cohort of consecutive patients seen in usual rheumatology care with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoarthritis (OA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and gout.

METHODS

Each patient completed an MDHAQ, which included a RADAI, at each visit in one usual care setting. In order to include a physician measure, a random visit at which there was a recorded physician global estimate was selected for each of 465 patients (174 patients with RA, 75 with SLE, 113 with OA, 53 with PsA, and 50 patients with gout). The RADAI was analyzed for total scores (range 0-48), number of involved joint groups (range 0-16), and each specific joint group, and then compared in the 5 diagnostic groups to one another and to other MDHAQ measures and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3).

RESULTS

In patients with RA, SLE, OA, PsA, and gout, mean RADAI scores (range 0-48) were 12.4, 6.5, 10.1, 6.7, and 2.7, respectively. The mean numbers of involved joint groups (range 0-16) were 6.9, 3.8, 4.8, 4.5, and 1.7, respectively, and the median numbers were 6, 2, 4, 4, and 1, respectively. RADAI scores were correlated significantly with the physician global estimate, except in SLE, and at higher levels with the MDHAQ and RAPID3 scores in all diagnostic groups.

CONCLUSION

The RADAI self-report joint counts can be used to record self-report involvement of specific joints and joint groups in patients with SLE, OA, PsA, and gout, with minimal effort on the part of the rheumatologist.

Usefulness of patients-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis focus group

Objective. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become an essential part of the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the agreement and correlation between PROs and the physician's measurements. Methods. This was a cross-sectional analytical study in which 135 patients with RA were clinically evaluated during two different sessions of focus group interviews. Rheumatologist recorded 28 swollen (SJCs) and tender joint counts (TJCs). The patients filled out the PROs instruments (MDHAQ, RADAI, RAPID3, 4, and 5 and self-report articular index (SAI) diagram for pain and joint swelling). DAS28 was calculated (C-reactive protein). An adjusted multiple lineal regression model was done (DAS28 as dependent variable). Results. Highly significant agreements were found between SJC and TJC registered by the physician and patient. There was moderate correlation between DAS28 with patient SJC (r = 0.52), patient TJC (r = 0.55), RADAI (r = 0.56), RAPID3 (r = 0.52), RAPID4 (r = 0.56), RAPID5 (r = 0.66), and VAS-Global (r = 0.51). Likewise, we found moderate to high correlations between CDAI and SDAI with all variable measurements done by the patients. The resulting predictive equation was DAS28(CRP) = 2.02 + 0.037 × RAPID4 + 0.042× patient SJC. Conclusion. PROs applied in focus groups interview are a useful tool for managing patients with RA regardless of gender, educational level, and duration of disease.

Systematic review and metaanalysis of patient self-report versus trained assessor joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Patient self-report outcomes and physician-performed joint counts are important measures of disease activity and treatment response. This metaanalysis examines the degree of concordance in joint counts between trained assessors and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Studies eligible for inclusion met the following criteria: English language; compared patient with trained assessor joint counts; peer-reviewed; and RA diagnosis determined by board-certified or board-eligible specialist or met 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria. We searched PubMed and Embase to identify articles between 1966 and January 1, 2008. We compared measures of correlation between patients and assessors for either tender/painful or swollen joint counts. We used metaanalysis methods to calculate summary correlation estimates.

RESULTS

We retrieved 462 articles and 18 were included. Self-report joint counts were obtained by a text and/or mannequin (picture) format. The summary estimates for the Pearson correlation coefficients for tender joint counts were 0.61 (0.47 lower, 0.75 upper) and for swollen joint counts 0.44 (0.15, 0.73). Summary results for the Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.60 (0.30, 0.90) for tender joint counts and 0.54 (0.35, 0.73) for swollen joint counts.

CONCLUSION

A self-report tender joint count has moderate to marked correlation with those performed by a trained assessor. In contrast, swollen joint counts demonstrate lower levels of correlation. Future research should explore whether integrating self-report tender joint counts into routine care can improve efficiency and quality of care, while directly involving patients in assessment of RA disease activity.

Development and validation of a patient-based disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis that can be used in clinical trials and routine practice

OBJECTIVE

Assessor-based disease activity measures such as the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), although widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have high interobserver variability. We developed and validated a patient-based disease activity score (PDAS) as an alternative assessment.

METHODS

Patients' assessments of swollen or tender joints, visual analog scales for pain and general health, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were used to develop the PDAS. In a developmental cohort (204 patients), regression analyses determined the best fit with the DAS28. A validation cohort (322 patients) subsequently evaluated criterion and construct validity against a range of outcome measures, including the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and Short Form 36 (SF-36). Sensitivity to change was assessed in 56 patients after 6 months of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biologics.

RESULTS

In the developmental cohort, the PDAS with ESR (PDAS1) and without ESR (PDAS2) achieved excellent fit with the DAS28 (r = 0.88 and 0.74, respectively). In the validation cohort, the PDAS showed high criterion validity by correlation with the DAS28 (PDAS1: r = 0.89, PDAS2: r = 0.76). Construct validity was demonstrated by high correlations with a range of disease activity measures (r > or = 0.45), whereas low correlations (r < 0.45) with mental and social components of the SF-36 and NHP indicated divergent validity. The PDAS and DAS28 had similar sensitivity to change, determined using effect sizes (DAS28 = 1.03, PDAS1 = 1.02, PDAS2 = 0.77) or standardized response means (DAS28 = 0.79, PDAS1 = 0.77, PDAS2 = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

The PDAS1 and PDAS2 are valid and sensitive tools to assess disease activity in RA. They appear suitable for clinical decision making, epidemiologic research, and clinical trials.

A proposed continuous quality improvement approach to assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis without formal joint counts, based on quantitative routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) scores on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ)

A continuous quality improvement approach is proposed for the assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on scores on a one-page patient self-report multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), without formal joint counts. The approach includes five simple steps before the patient is seen by the physician: (1) an MDHAQ is completed by every patient at every visit; (2) scores are calculated for patient function, pain, and global estimate, with options for a self-report joint count and other scales; (3) scores are entered on flow sheets with data from prior visits, which might also include laboratory and medication information; (4) scores are compiled into an index termed Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID), analogous to a Disease Activity Score (DAS); (5) RAPID scores are classified to guide treatment decisions. RAPID 3 includes the three patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in the RA Core Data Set - physical function, pain, and global estimate. RAPID 4 adds a self-report joint count, and RAPID 5, a physician global estimate. RAPID 3 can be calculated in about 10 seconds, RAPID 4 in about 19 seconds, and RAPID 5 in about 20 seconds. RAPID 3, RAPID 4, and RAPID 5 give similar results to distinguish active from control treatments in RA clinical trials, at levels similar to American College of Rheumatology or DAS improvement criteria, and are all correlated significantly with DAS28 (rho=0.62-0.64, P<0.001). A proposed classification of RAPID scores, analogous to four DAS28 categories, includes: 'near remission' (0-1), 'low severity' (1.01-2), 'moderate severity' (2.01-4), and 'high severity' (>4). RAPID scoring is feasible in standard clinical care to support continuous quality improvement.

Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations

No single measure can serve as a 'gold standard' for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of patients with rheumatic diseases. Therefore, pooled indices of several measures have been developed for patient assessment. Quantitative measures and indices in rheumatology have been used primarily in clinical trials and other clinical research, but not in standard clinical care. Indeed, most standard rheumatology care is conducted without quantitative data other than laboratory tests, which often are uninformative. Some measures used in research have been adapted for standard care. The classical 66/68-joint count with graded scoring for swelling, tenderness, pain on motion, limited motion, and deformity has been shortened for clinical care to a 28-joint count, scored only as 'Yes' or 'No' for swelling or tenderness. Patient questionnaires designed for clinical research can be lengthy, with complex scoring, so that information is not available to help guide clinical decisions. By contrast, patient questionnaires designed for standard care, such as a simple one-page, multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), are short, save time, are easily scored, and are useful in all rheumatic diseases to monitor patient status at each visit and document changes over long periods. More attention to measures for use in standard care could improve care and outcomes for patients with rheumatic diseases.

A model of impairment and functional limitation in rheumatoid arthritis

Background

We have previously proposed a theoretical model for studying physical disability and other outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this paper is to test a model of impairment and functional limitation in (RA), using empirical data from a sample of RA patients. We based the model on the disablement process framework.

Methods

We posited two distinct types of impairment in RA: 1) Joint inflammation, measured by the tender, painful and swollen joint counts; and 2) Joint deformity, measured by the deformed joint count. We hypothesized direct paths from the two impairments to functional limitation, measured by the shirt-button speed, grip strength and walking velocity. We used structural equation modeling to test the hypothetical relationships, using empirical data from a sample of RA patients recruited from six rheumatology clinics.

Results

The RA sample was comprised of 779 RA patients. In the structural equation model, the joint inflammation impairment displayed a strong significant path toward the measured variables of joint pain, tenderness and swelling (standardized regression coefficients 0.758, 0.872 and 0.512, P ≤ 0.001 for each). The joint deformity impairment likewise displayed significant paths toward the measured upper limb, lower limb, and other deformed joint counts (standardized regression coefficients 0.849, 0.785, 0.308, P ≤ 0.001 for each). Both the joint inflammation and joint deformity impairments displayed strong direct paths toward functional limitation (standardized regression coefficients of -0.576 and -0.564, respectively, P ≤ 0.001 for each), and explained 65% of its variance. Model fit to data was fair to good, as evidenced by a comparative fit index of 0.975, and the root mean square error of approximation = 0.058.

Conclusion

This evidence supports the occurrence of two distinct impairments in RA, joint inflammation and joint deformity, that together, contribute strongly to functional limitations in this disease. These findings may have implications for investigators aiming to measure outcome in RA.

Latent variable approach to the measurement of physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To measure physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a latent variable derived from a generic and a disease-specific self-reported disability instrument and an observer-assessed functional status scale.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with RA completed the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical function scale. An observer assigned a Steinbrocker functional classification. We used principal component factor analysis to extract a latent variable from the 3 scales. We used the Bayesian Information Criterion to compare how well the new latent variable and the 3 primary scales fit the criterion standards of current work status; vital status at 6 years; grip strength; walking velocity; the timed-button test; pain; and joint tenderness, swelling, and deformity.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 776 RA patients. The extracted latent variable explained 75% of the variance in the 3 primary scales. On a scale of 0-100, higher scores representing less disability, its mean +/- SD was 56.4 +/- 22.5. Correlation between the latent variable and the M-HAQ was -0.87; between the latent variable and SF-36 physical function scale was 0.89, and between the latent variable and Steinbrocker class was -0.85. Multivariate models that included the latent variable had superior fit than did models containing the primary scales for the criteria of current working; death by 6 years; pain; joint tenderness, swelling, or deformity; grip strength; walking velocity; and timed button test.

CONCLUSION

A latent variable derived from the M-HAQ, the SF-36 physical function scale, and the Steinbrocker functional class provides a parsimonious scale to measure physical disability in RA. The fit of the latent variable to comparison standards is equivalent or superior to that of the primary scales.

Ethnic variation in the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: role of HLA-DRB1 alleles

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent of ethnic variation in the clinical expression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the role of HLA-DRB1 alleles in this variation.

METHODS

We assessed consecutive RA patients for joint findings, subcutaneous nodules, laboratory and radiographic findings, and treatment. We typed HLA-DRB1 alleles to identify those that contain the shared epitope (SE). We adjusted ethnic comparisons for age and sex, and tested for ethnic heterogeneity in the effect of the SE.

RESULTS

We studied 777 RA patients, 498 of whom were women (64%), 432 were Hispanic (56%), 272 were non-Hispanic white (NHW; 35%), 53 were African American (AA; 7%), and 20 were Asian (3%). Compared with NHW, Hispanics had significantly more tender joints (17 versus 11), more swollen joints (8 versus 7), more frequent rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity (93% versus 84%), higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; 45 versus 36 mm/hr), and a lower number of lifetime disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (1.9 versus 2.5). AA were older at onset (46 versus 44 years), had less frequent subcutaneous nodules (18% versus 28%), and higher ESR (42 versus 36 mm/hour) than did NHW. Hispanics and AA were more likely than NHW to be null for the SE (odds ratio [OR] = 4.59 for AA; and OR = 1.61 for Hispanics), and less likely to have 2 SE-carrying alleles (OR = 0.59 for Hispanics and OR = 0.25 for AA). The number of SE copies was associated with subcutaneous nodules, ESR, RF, and radiographic changes. Ethnic heterogeneity in the effect of the SE was modest.

CONCLUSIONS

There is ethnic variation in the clinical expression of RA and in both the frequency and types of SE-carrying HLA-DRB1 alleles. Some ethnic variation in clinical findings is associated with differences in SE frequency. However, we found that the effect of the SE on the clinical features of RA varies little between ethnic groups.

Reliability of self assessed joint counts in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability of self reported joint counts to assess pain or swelling in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

217 outpatients fulfilling the modified New York criteria for AS were asked to mark painful joints and swollen joints on two mannequins presenting 44 and 40 joints respectively. A doctor or research nurse assessed the same joints for pain and swelling on the same day, after completion by the patient, without information on the results of the patient's assessment.

RESULTS

Forty six (21%) patients reported one or more swollen joints (mean number of swollen joints 0.5, range 0-8); the doctor found one or more swollen joints in 54 (25%) of the patients (mean number of swollen joints 0.8, range 0-31). The overall agreement on the number of swollen joints between patients and doctor was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.53). Agreement on individual swollen joints was poor to moderate (kappa 0.1-0.64). 128 (60%) patients reported tender joints (mean number of joints 2.4, range 0-26). The doctors reported one of more tender joints in 50% of the patients (mean number of tender joints 2.2, range 0-34). The overall agreement was also moderate (ICC 0.71). The agreement on individual tender joints was again poor to moderate (kappa 0.19-0.43). There was only high concordance between doctors and patients on the absence of swollen joints (82%). The concordance on the presence of monoarthritis, oligoarthritis, or polyarthritis was low (17-22%).

CONCLUSION

Owing to these discrepancies in assessment of individual joints and total number of affected joints, joint counts in AS assessed by doctors cannot be replaced by joint counts reported by the patients. Patients are only able to judge if their joints are not swollen.

Heterogeneity between men and women in the influence of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope on the clinical expression of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the influence of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) on the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) differs between men and women.

METHODS

We assessed 777 consecutive RA patients for age at disease onset, articular manifestations, subcutaneous nodules, laboratory and radiographic findings, and treatment received. We typed HLA-DRB1 alleles by polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primer amplification and categorized the number of SE-containing alleles. We used regression models to adjust comparisons between the sexes for age and clustering by recruitment center, and included SE x sex interaction terms to look for heterogeneity between men and women in the effect of the SE.

RESULTS

Among the 777 RA patients, 548 (71%) were women. Men and women differed significantly in the adjusted frequency of SE positivity (women 71.4% versus men 78.4%; P < or = 0.001). The SE was associated with a younger age at symptom onset and RA diagnosis among men, but not among women. The SE likewise had a significant adverse effect on joint tenderness, swelling, and deformity among men only. The SE was associated with a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate in women and more frequent positivity for rheumatoid factor among both men and women.

CONCLUSION

There is heterogeneity between men and women in the effect of the SE on RA susceptibility and clinical expression. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism of this heterogeneity.

The number of deformed joints as a surrogate measure of damage in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the number of deformed joints (NDJ) as a surrogate measure of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We tested interrater reliability and validity in determining the NDJ as a surrogate for joint damage in consecutive patients with RA. We rated each of 48 joints as normal or abnormal in terms of alignment and range of motion, and expressed the results as the total number of deformed joints. We compared the NDJ with the severity of damage on a plain radiograph of the hands, scored using Sharp's technique, as the gold standard measure of joint damage. We also compared the correlation between the NDJ and radiographic joint damage, on the one hand, and disease duration, performance-based measures of physical function, and the self-reported level of disability.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability of the NDJ was excellent, with an intraclass correlation among four examiners of 0.94. To assess validity of the NDJ, we studied 273 RA patients from 5 clinical settings. Their average NDJ was 14 (range 0-43), and their average Sharp's score for joint space narrowing and erosions combined was 106 (range 4-309). The NDJ and the total Sharp's score were highly correlated (r = 0.83). Both measures were correlated to a similar degree with disease duration (r = 0.51 for each measure), grip strength (r = -0.49 for NDJ, and r = -0.51 for Sharp's score), walking velocity (r = -0.44 for NDJ, and r = -0.45 for Sharp's score), the timed button test (r = -0.62 for NDJ, and r = -0.57 for Sharp's score), and the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = 0.38 for NDJ, and r = 0.38 for Sharp's score). Both the Sharp's score and the NDJ worsened significantly in 38 patients for whom 1-2 year followup data were available.

CONCLUSION

The NDJ is reliable and is strongly associated with the standard measure of joint damage in RA. Because it is easily performed in a clinical setting, it could be used as an economical surrogate of joint damage in studies of the long-term outcome of RA.

Elk velvet antler in rheumatoid arthritis: phase II trial

The purpose of this phase II clinical trial was to examine safety of elk velvet antler taken concurrently with rheumatoid arthritis medications and to determine efficacy by dose to enable sample size estimation and dose standardization for a larger study. Forty patients with stage II rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 arms of 10 patients each. One group received placebo and the other 3 groups received 2, 4, or 6 capsules (215 mg) of elk velvet antler with appropriate placebos to total 6 capsules daily. All subjects continued to take their arthritis medications. Outcome variables were reported adverse events and health status. At 1 month, there were no significant differences between groups in number of adverse events or health status. The greatest improvement was in the 6 elk velvet antler group, the least was in the placebo group. Differences were not statistically significant. It was concluded that elk velvet antler can be taken safely in conjunction with a number of rheumatoid arthritis medications and should be studied further to assess efficacy.

High incidence of cardiovascular events in a rheumatoid arthritis cohort not explained by traditional cardiac risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events in persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with that in people from the general population, adjusting for traditional CV risk factors.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-six consecutive patients with RA were assessed for the 1-year occurrence of 1) CV-related hospitalizations, including myocardial infarction, stroke or other arterial occlusive events, or arterial revascularization procedures, or 2) CV deaths. Both outcomes were ascertained by medical records or death certificates. For comparison, we used CV events that occurred during an 8-year period among participants in an epidemiologic study of atherosclerosis and CV disease who were ages 25-65 years at study entry. We calculated the age- and sex-stratified incidence rate ratio (IRR) of CV events between the 2 cohorts and used Poisson regression to adjust for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Of the 236 RA patients, 234 were observed for 252 patient-years, during which 15 CV events occurred. Of these, 7 incident events occurred during the 204 patient-years contributed by patients ages 25-65 years, for an incidence of 3.43 per 100 patient-years. In the comparison cohort, 4,635 community-dwelling persons were followed up for 33,881 person-years, during which 200 new events occurred, for an incidence of 0.59 per 100 person-years. The age- and sex-adjusted IRR of incident CV events associated with RA was 3.96 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.86-8.43). After adjusting for CV risk factors using Poisson regression, the IRR decreased slightly, to 3.17 (95% CI 1.33-6.36).

CONCLUSION

The increased incidence of CV events in RA patients is independent of traditional CV risk factors. This suggests that additional mechanisms are responsible for CV disease in RA. Physicians who provide care to individuals with RA should be aware of their increased risk of CV events and implement appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic measures.

A comparison of two methods of assessing disease activity in the joints

BACKGROUND

Considerable debate has occurred concerning the utility of different methods of obtaining joint counts and their usefulness in predicting outcomes in persons with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of assessing disease activity in the joints (clinician joint count, self-reported joint count), and to compare their relative utility in predicting two methods of assessing outcomes (self-reported ratings of impairment and pain, objective performance index) with and without controlling for negative affectivity.

METHOD

Data for this study were obtained during home visits from 185 persons diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. Individuals completed a series of self-report measures including the joint count. Trained research assistants completed a 28-joint count and timed participants on a series of measured performance activities (e.g., grip strength, pinch strength, walk time).

RESULTS

The self-report joint count was highly correlated with the clinician joint count and also accounted for as much, if not more, variance in the subjective outcome measures than did clinician assessments. Both types of indicators predicted unique variance in the objective performance index.

CONCLUSIONS

For most research purposes, measures such as self-report joint counts have sufficient validity to be used in place of more costly clinician assessment of joint counts.

Update on outcome assessment in rheumatic disorders

Outcome assessment in rheumatic disorders is getting more and more attention. A series of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences has provided a good impulse for further research in the field. In this chapter we will review the results of the last OMERACT 4 conference in detail. This conference was focused on longitudinal/observational studies, rheumatoid arthritis (response criteria and imaging), and core sets for ankylosing spondylitis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Moreover, an overview of recent literature on measures of disease activity, quality of life measures, and imaging is presented. For the various rheumatic disorders, several new instruments and/or further validation steps are described.

Cross-cultural equivalence of a brief helplessness scale for Spanish-speaking rheumatology patients in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To show evidence of the cross-cultural equivalence between the original English version of a 5-item scale for measuring helplessness and a translated Spanish version.

METHODS

English and Spanish versions of the 5 items that constitute the helplessness factor of the Rheumatology Attitudes Index were tested in 3 separate groups of patients: 1) 20 bilingual rheumatology patients; 2) 100 consecutive English- and 50 consecutive Spanish-speaking monolingual rheumatology patients; and 3) 192 English- and 44 Spanish-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were consecutively enrolled in a cohort to study disease outcomes. English-Spanish concordance among bilingual subjects was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Associations between the helplessness scale and variables measured simultaneously in English- and Spanish-speaking patients were measured by correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Agreement between the English and Spanish versions of the helplessness scale among bilingual subjects was excellent (ICC = 0.87), and internal consistency among monolingual subjects was acceptable (coefficient alpha = 0.73 in English and 0.87 in Spanish). The correlation between helplessness and most other measured variables was of similar size and direction in English as in Spanish (10-point pain scale r = -0.53 and -0.52; modified Health Assessment Questionnaire physical disability r = -0.45 and -0.43; self-assessed joint count r = 0.36 and 0.36; Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF-36] physical function r = 0.37 and 0.39; SF-36 mental health r = 0.27 and 0.35; Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale r = -0.37 and -0.33, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The evidence shown supports the cross-cultural equivalence between the original 5-item helplessness scale developed in English and our translated Spanish version.

How much disability in rheumatoid arthritis is explained by rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE

To measure the proportion of disability explained by disease manifestations compared with nondisease factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A hypothetical model of the disablement process specific for RA was constructed using the demographic, sociocultural, and clinical characteristics of a consecutive cohort of RA patients. Disability was measured with the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) and the physical function scale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Independent variables, grouped according to their position in the RA disablement process model, were sequentially entered in a series of hierarchical regression models. The proportion of variance in disability explained by each group of variables was measured by the group's incremental R2.

RESULTS

The overall proportion of disability explained by the full model was 59%. Factors in the main disease-disability pathway explained 33%, of which 3% was explained by disease duration, 5% by the Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 14% by articular signs and symptoms, and 11% by performance-based functional limitations. External modifiers and contextual variables explained 26% of the variance in disability, of which age and sex accounted for 2%, formal education 4%, psychological status 17%, and symptoms of depression 3%.

CONCLUSION

Both the main disease-disability pathway and factors external to this pathway contribute significantly to disability in RA. These findings provide evidence of the relative influence of psychosocial factors, compared with disease manifestations, on the disability of patients with RA.

HLA-DRB1 alleles associated with susceptibility or resistance to rheumatoid arthritis, articular deformities, and disability in Mexican Americans

OBJECTIVE

To study the genetics (HLA-DRB1 allele associations) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) susceptibility and severity among Mexican Americans, an important, but understudied, US population.

METHODS

HLA-DRB1 alleles were compared between 141 Mexican American patients with RA and 54 unrelated Mexican Americans without RA, and the association of these alleles with articular deformities and disability was examined. HLA-DRB1 alleles were typed using polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primer amplification and were classified according to the 1996 World Health Organization nomenclature.

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients, 105 (74%) had at least 1 copy of the shared epitope (SE) sequence, compared with 29 (54%) of the 54 controls (P = 0.007). A significant gene-dose effect was observed, with 31 patients (22%) being homozygous for the SE compared with 1 (2%) of the controls (P = 0.004). In terms of disease severity, only 3% of RA patients who were "null" for the SE were outliers in the rate of development of articular deformities, compared with 10% of heterozygotes and 27% of homozygotes (P = 0.002). Patients who were DRB1*08 positive had significantly fewer deformities per year of disease and a slower rate of development of disability than did patients with other DRB1 alleles.

CONCLUSION

HLA-DRB1 alleles containing the SE are associated with susceptibility to RA in Mexican Americans, and may also be associated with a more rapid development of articular deformities and disability. HLA-DRB1*08 appears to have a protective influence on RA susceptibility and disease severity in Mexican Americans.