Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduce radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized clinical trial

Diagnosis, monitoring, and management of axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic condition predominantly affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. This article provides an in-depth overview of the current approaches to diagnosing, monitoring, and managing axSpA, including insights into developing terminology and diagnostic difficulties. A substantial portion of the debate focuses on the challenging diagnostic procedure, noting the difficulty of detecting axSpA early, particularly before the appearance of radiologic structural changes. Despite normal laboratory parameters, more than half of axSpA patients experience symptoms. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are essential for evaluating structural damage and inflammation. MRI can be beneficial when there is no visible structural damage on X-ray as it can help unravel bone marrow edema (BME) as a sign of ongoing inflammation. The management covers both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Lifestyle modifications, physical activity, and patient education are essential components of the management. Pharmacological therapy, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), are explored, emphasizing individualized treatment. To effectively manage axSpA, a comprehensive and well-coordinated approach is necessary, emphasizing the significance of a multidisciplinary team. Telehealth applications play a growing role in axSpA management, notably in reducing diagnostic delays and facilitating remote monitoring. In conclusion, this article underlines diagnostic complexities and emphasizes the changing strategy of axSpA treatment. The nuanced understanding offered here is designed to guide clinicians, researchers, and healthcare providers toward a more comprehensive approach to axSpA diagnosis and care.

Incidence rate of chronic kidney disease and its association with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in ankylosing spondylitis: A nationwide population-based study

AIM

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) predominantly affects the spine and sacroiliac joints, with rare renal involvement. We investigated the incidence rate and risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with AS and its relationship with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients diagnosed with AS from the Korean National Health Insurance service. The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) NSAID Intake Scores were categorized into four groups, as follows: =0, >0 and ≤33.3, 33.3-66.6, and >66.6.

RESULTS

Of the 12 000 patients with AS, 150 were identified with CKD, and the incidence rate was 4.64 per 10 000 patient-years. Factors significantly associated with CKD included age ≥60 years, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. In the nested case-control analysis, among the ASAS NSAIDs Intake Scores for 0-365 days from diagnosis, the ≥66.6 group had a significantly lower odds ratio than those of the =0 group.

CONCLUSION

The present study established the incidence rate of CKD in Korean patients with AS. Though older age and comorbidities were found to be associated with a higher CKD risk, long-term NSAID use was associated with a lower risk. Therefore, the optimal use of NSAIDs in inflammatory diseases requires extensive research.

Treatment controversies in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: focus on biologics and targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

There are several treatment controversies that have emerged in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. These are related to the nature of the conditions as well as to the use of medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review, which included a search of PubMed database as well as the references within the articles provides an overview of the nature of spondyloarthritis, controversy over the inclusion of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a peripheral spondyloarthritis, and a summary of current treatments for both PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), with special emphasis on targeted therapy. The review highlights the differences in response to certain medications, particularly biologic therapy and summarizes the randomized controlled trials in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis providing data about the responses in table format.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need for better outcome measures in axSpA. Currently, the measures are subjective. Imaging may be more appropriate but there is a need for research into the reliability and responsiveness of imaging techniques. In PsA, there may also be better response measures and research into the reliability and responsiveness of available measures is underway. There is also a need for novel therapies as well as biomarkers for response in both diseases.

Disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis - still a controversy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates recent advancements in disease-modifying therapies for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent study could not demonstrate an additional effect of NSAID therapy on golimumab [Tumor Necrosis Factor-α inhibitor (TNFi)] on structural progression; however, this might be due to the fact that the study was underpowered. While DMARDs have shown promise in suppressing inflammation, their impact on structural progression remains uncertain. A well powered trial showed no difference in spinal progression between secukinumab [Interleukin17A inhibitor (IL17Ai)] and adalimumab-biosimilar (TNFi). Preliminary data on Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) focus on MRI findings but lack evidence on radiographic spinal progression. While some studies suggest promising outcomes, others reveal limitations and inconclusive findings.

SUMMARY

Recent studies explore the effectiveness of NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs like TNFi and IL-17i, as well as JAK inhibitors in axSpA. Conflicting evidence surrounds these therapies' ability to impede structural progression, with challenges in study design and interpretation. Moreover, changes in demographics and treatment methods underscore the importance of examining trends over time when assessing disease outcomes. Ultimately, ongoing research could benefit from new imaging tools when evaluating therapeutic strategies for modifying disease progression in axSpA.

Clinical and structural damage outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis patients receiving NSAIDs or advanced therapies: a description of a real-life cohort

Introduction

This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, disease activity, and structural damage in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who receive chronic treatment with nonsteroideal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or advanced therapies in a clinical setting.

Methods

Cross-sectional study on axSpA patients consecutively recruited from the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital. We collected data on clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as treatment patterns involving NSAIDs and advanced therapies. Structural damage was assessed using mSASSS.

Results

Overall, data from 193 axSpA patients (83% ankylosing spondylitis) were gathered, with a mean disease duration of 21.4 years. Of these, 85 patients (44%) were exclusively taking NSAIDs, while 108 (56%) were receiving advanced therapies, with TNF inhibitors being the predominant choice (93 out of 108, 86.1%). Among patients using NSAIDs, 64.7% followed an on-demand dosing regimen, while only 17.6% used full doses. Disease activity was low, with a mean BASDAI of 3.1 and a mean ASDAS-CRP of 1.8. In comparison to patients under chronic NSAID treatment, those taking advanced therapies were primarily male (69.4% versus 51.8%, p = 0.025) and significantly younger (mean age of 49 versus 53.9 years, p = 0.033). Additionally, patients on advanced therapies exhibited lower ASDAS-CRP (p = 0.046), although CRP serum levels and BASDAI scores did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariable analysis, therapy (NSAID versus biological treatment) was not independently associated with ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI or mSASSS.

Conclusion

This cross-sectional analysis of a real-world cohort of axSpA patients shows positive clinical and radiological outcomes for both NSAIDs and advanced therapies.

Looking back on 51 years of the Carol Nachman Prize in Rheumatology-significance for the field of spondyloarthritis research

The city and casino of Wiesbaden, capital of the German state Hessen, have endowed the Carol Nachman Prize to promote research work in the field of rheumatology since 1972. The prize, endowed with 37,500 €, is the second highest medical award in Germany and serves to promote clinical, therapeutic, and experimental research work in the field of rheumatology. In June 2022, the 50-year anniversary was celebrated. In the symposium preceding the award ceremony, an overview was given on the significance of spondyloarthritis for the work of the awardees in the past 30 years. This overview has now been put together to inform the interested community of the work performed, including the opinion of the awardees regarding what they consider to be their most important contribution.

Comparison of Yoga with exercise in ankylosing spondylitis on mobility and functional capacity

AIM

To compare the effects of Yoga with traditional exercise on the mobility and functional capacity of individuals with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

The participants of the study were recruited at the rheumatology department, adhering to the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were randomized into two groups (Group A - Yoga, and Group B - exercise).The candidates participated in an 8-week intervention consisting of 3 weekly sessions of either Yoga or Exercise intervention. Outcomes were collected at pre-treatment, at 8 weeks, and at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The within-group comparison showed an improvement in all outcome measures with p < .05 between post-treatment and the follow-up. In the yoga group, there was an improvement in the measures of BASMI (p = .001), BASFI (p = .005), PSQI (p = .021), CE (p = .053) and NPRS (p = .001). Similarly, in the exercise group, there was an improvement in BASMI (p = .002), BASFI (p = .003), PSQI (p = .010), CE (p = .004) and NPRS (p = .001). In the between group comparison at post-treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in BASMI (yoga = 3.0 ± 1.50, exercise = 2.3 ± 1.38), PSQI (yoga = 5.3 ± 1.50, exercise = 4.9 ± 1.17) and NPRS (yoga = 1.3 ± 2.22, exercise = 0.4 ± 0.50) CE (yoga = 4.0 ± 1.18, exercise = 3.4 ± 0.96), BASFI (yoga = 1.8 ± 2.14, exercise = 2.1 ± 1.87).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in within-group scores of mobility, functional capacity, sleep quality and pain in AS patients of both intervention programs but there were no significant differences between the groups.

Opioid use surrounding diagnosis and follow-up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis: Results from US claims databases

OBJECTIVE

To describe patients' use of opioids in the year preceding and year following new diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with patients without the/se diseases.

METHODS

This study used US IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) and Medicaid data and included three cohorts, comprised of incident cases of AS, PsA, or RA (2010-2017). Three matched comparator patients (without the incident disease) were selected for each patient within the disease cohort. Opioid use and appropriate treatment exposure (as defined by US guideline recommendations) in the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods were evaluated using descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

Prevalence of claims for opioids was higher for disease cohorts vs. comparators in CCAE; 36.4% of patients with AS, 29.5% with PsA, and 44.4% with RA did not have any claim for guideline-appropriate therapy in follow-up. Prevalence of claims for opioids was also higher for disease cohorts vs. comparators in Medicaid; 30.6% of patients with AS, 36.6% with PsA, and 65.4% with RA did not have any claim for guideline-appropriate therapy in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AS, PsA, or RA, there was high reliance on opioids at and around the time of diagnosis. Significant proportions of patients were not on appropriate treatment as defined by professional society post-diagnosis guidelines; this discordance between actual patient therapies and treatment recommendations may suggest a need for better awareness of appropriate pain management and treatment strategies in rheumatic diseases. Key Points • This study analysed opioid use among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and adds to current knowledge by expanding beyond assessment of opioid use at diagnosis, to the year before and after diagnosis. • Opioid use was found to be highly prevalent in AS, PsA, and RA in the year prior to diagnosis and, interestingly, was still seen during the year after diagnosis. • Opioids are neither disease modifying, nor a targeted/recommended treatment for chronic autoimmune diseases. In addition to their association with significant economic costs, opioids are potentially hazardous and are not better than alternative treatments with superior safety profiles. • The reasons behind opioid prescribing patterns should be explored further to support movement to targeted therapies.

Comparison of the effect of treatment with NSAIDs added to anti-TNF therapy versus anti-TNF therapy alone on the progression of structural damage in the spine over 2 years in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis from the randomised-controlled CONSUL trial

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), celecoxib (CEL), to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), golimumab (GOL), compared with TNFi monotherapy on radiographic spinal progression in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) over 2 years.

METHODS

R-axSpA patients, having risk factors for radiographic progression (high disease activity plus C reactive protein >5 mg/L and/or ≥1 syndesmophyte(s)), underwent a 12-week run-in phase with GOL 50 mg every 4 weeks. In the core phase (96 weeks), only patients with a good clinical response at week 12 were randomised (1:1) to GOL+CEL 200 mg two times per day (combination therapy) or GOL monotherapy. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression assessed by modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) change at week 108 in the intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were enrolled in the run-in phase; and 109 patients were randomised at week 12 to monotherapy (n=55) or combination therapy (n=54). At week 108, 97 (52 vs 45) patients completed the study. The change in mSASSS at week 108 was 1.7 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.6) in the monotherapy vs 1.1 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.8) in the combination therapy groups (p=0.79). New syndesmophytes occurred in 25% of patients in the monotherapy vs 11% of patients in the combination therapy groups (p=0.12). During the study, no significant differences in adverse events and serious adverse events were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with GOL+CEL did not demonstrate statistically significant superiority over GOL monotherapy in retarding radiographic spinal progression over 2 years in r-axSpA.

Current Pharmacological Therapies for the Management of Spondyloarthritis: Special Considerations in Older Patients

Spondylarthritis (SpA) is generally observed in young male patients but can be diagnosed in older patients. These cases correspond to late-onset SpA (LoSpA) with two main clinical presentations, axial and peripheral SpA. Another increasingly common situation is that of older patients who have had SpA for many years. The therapeutic management of LoSpA is quite smilar to the management of patients with an early-onset disease, combining both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. The treatments that can be used in LoSpA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biological agents targeting TNFα or IL-17A. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) were recently introduced on the market for SpA. TNF inhibitors and IL-17inhibitors are very effective drugs in early-onset SpA. The effectiveness and safety of targeted therapies have not been specifically evaluated in LoSpA or older patients, and thus caution is required for these patients with comorbidities and/or polymedication. According to indirect data, biological agents seem to be less effective in LoSpA compared with early-onset disease. In parallel, a careful evaluation for the risk of infection, malignancy and cardiovascular events is recommended before initiating these drugs in this age category. JAKi may be used in LoSpA, but only in selected patients according to recent recommendations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). When considering that the prevalence of such situations is expected to increase as ageing progresses, it is certainly time to consider this patient category as a distinct subgroup within the spectrum of SpA. Specific studies evaluating targeted agents in this age category are thus desirable.

Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises a spectrum of chronic inflammatory manifestations affecting the axial skeleton and represents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to generate a set of evidence-based recommendations for the management of axSpA for physicians, health professionals, rheumatologists and policy decision makers in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-ADOLOPMENT methodology was used to adapt existing recommendations after performing an independent systematic search and synthesis of the literature to update the evidence. A working group consisting of rheumatologists, epidemiologists and patient representatives from countries within the Americas prioritized 13 topics relevant to the context of these countries for the management of axSpA. This Evidence-Based Guideline article reports 13 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, the use of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, treatment with DMARDs (including conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs), therapeutic failure, optimization of the use of biologic DMARDs, the use of drugs for extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA, non-pharmacological interventions and the follow-up of patients with axSpA.

Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis

We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and Kmbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5-12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Recommendations 13-16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.

Structural disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis

"Disease modification" in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) seeks to not only alleviate clinical symptoms but also alter the disease's natural course by impeding new bone formation. Recent years have witnessed the effectiveness of treatments, including biologics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, in managing axSpA symptoms. Emerging evidence points toward their potential impact on slowing structural disease progression. This comprehensive review centers on the pivotal role of inhibiting new bone formation in axSpA disease modification. It delves into the significance of imaging techniques for assessing disease progression and explores the disease-modifying properties of available axSpA treatments, encompassing NSAIDs, TNF inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors. This article offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of disease modification strategies in axial spondyloarthritis, highlighting the multifaceted approaches used to attain these objectives.

Treatment overview of axial spondyloarthritis in 2023

The treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is characterized by non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. It may depend on the type and extent of musculoskeletal and extramusculoskeletal manifestations. Recent data on non-pharmacological treatment options, such as physical activity, physiotherapy, and modification of lifestyle factors, are summarized in this review. Moreover, we have provided an overview on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the ever-expanding number of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, respectively). In addition to data on efficacy and safety, the review also encompasses data on switching/cycling, tapering, and treatment selection for specific patient subgroups to optimize treatment outcomes.

Pregnancy & neonatal outcomes in spondyloarthritis

Limited research has been conducted on the impact of spondylitis (SpA) on fertility, but some studies suggest a higher risk of subfertility in women with SpA compared to the general population. Factors associated with impaired fertility in SpA include pain, fatigue, stiffness, functional disorders, depression, anxiety, negative body image, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) preconceptionally, while TNF alpha inhibitors may play a role in improving fertility in certain cases. There has been a recent increase in clinical research focused on pregnancy outcomes in SpA. However, clear trends in terms of risk of pregnancy and fetal complications have been slow to emerge and many questions remain for women with SpA planning a pregnancy. This article discusses the current evidence for risk of specific pregnancy and fetal complications in women with axial and psoriatic SpA.

Advances in pharmacotherapies for axial spondyloarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) refers to an inflammatory rheumatic disease that mainly affects the axial skeleton and leads to progressive radiographic changes of the sacroiliac joints and spine. axSpA is currently subdivided into the radiographic (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic (nr-axSpA) form. Both forms are associated with musculoskeletal pain, restriction of spinal mobility, specific extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, and overall, altered quality of life. The therapeutic management of axSpA is currently well standardized.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed available literature (by using PubMed search) on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options that may be used in axSpA, including r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, as well as the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), biological agents including TNFalpha (TNFi) and IL-17 (IL-17i) inhibitors. New treatment options such as Janus kinase inhibitors are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

NSAIDs remain the mainstay of initial therapy, and subsequently, biological agents (TNFi and IL-17i) may be envisaged. Four TNFi are licensed for the treatment of both r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, while IL-17i are approved in each indication. The choice between a TNFi and an IL-17i is mainly guided by the presence of extra-articular manifestations. JAKi were more recently introduced for the treatment of r-axSpA, but their use is restricted to specific patients with a safe cardiovascular profile.

The bone marrow side of axial spondyloarthritis

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is characterized by the infiltration of innate and adaptive immune cells into entheses and bone marrow. Molecular, cellular and imaging evidence demonstrates the presence of bone marrow inflammation, a hallmark of SpA. In the spine and the peripheral joints, bone marrow is critically involved in the pathogenesis of SpA. Evidence suggests that bone marrow inflammation is associated with enthesitis and that there are roles for mechano-inflammation and intestinal inflammation in bone marrow involvement in SpA. Specific cell types (including mesenchymal stem cells, innate lymphoid cells and γδ T cells) and mediators (Toll-like receptors and cytokines such as TNF, IL-17A, IL-22, IL-23, GM-CSF and TGFβ) are involved in these processes. Using this evidence to demonstrate a bone marrow rather than an entheseal origin for SpA could change our understanding of the disease pathogenesis and the relevant therapeutic approach.

Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis

We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and KMbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5~12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Recommendations 13~16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.

Prostaglandin E2/EP4 axis is upregulated in Spondyloarthritis and contributes to radiographic progression

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disease leading to spine ankylosis; however, the mechanisms behind new bone formation are still not fully understood. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in PTGER4, encoding for the receptor EP4 of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), are associated with AS. Since the PGE2-EP4 axis participates in inflammation and bone metabolism, this work aims at investigating the influence of the prostaglandin-E2 axis on radiographic progression in AS. In 185 AS (97 progressors), baseline serum PGE2 predicted progression, and PTGER4 SNP rs6896969 was more frequent in progressors. Increased EP4/PTGER4 expression was observed in AS circulating immune cells, synovial tissue, and bone marrow. CD14highEP4 + cells frequency correlated with disease activity, and when monocytes were cocultured with mesenchymal stem cells, the PGE2/EP4 axis induced bone formation. In conclusion, the Prostaglandin E2 axis is involved in bone remodelling and may contribute to the radiographic progression in AS due to genetic and environmental upregulation.

The relationship between long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and kidney function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Objective

Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first-line treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), their effect on kidney function remains unclear. This longitudinal study investigated the correlation between long-term NSAID use and kidney function in patients with AS using electronic medical records.

Methods

The electronic medical records of 1,280 patients with AS collected from a single center between January 2001 and December 2018 were reviewed. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) NSAID Intake Score was used to determine the cumulative dose of all NSAIDs prescribed for a different time intervals. Each ASAS NSAID Intake Score was obtained for intervals of 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years. The correlation between the ASAS NSAID Intake Score and final estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for each interval was investigated.

Results

The mean ASAS Intake Scores for 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year intervals were 55.30, 49.28, 44.84, 44.14, 44.61, and 41.17, respectively. At each interval, the pearson correlation coefficients were -0.018 (95% CI -0.031 to -0.006, p=0.004), -0.021 (95% CI -0.039 to -0.004, p=0.018), -0.045 (95% CI -0.071 to -0.019, p=0.001), -0.069 (95% CI -0.102 to -0.037, p<0.001), -0.070 (95% CI -0.114 to -0.026, p=0.002), -0.019 (95% CI -0.099 to 0.062, p=0.645), respectively. There was a very weak negative relationship between ASAS Intake Score and eGFR at each interval.

Conclusion

Long-term NSAID use did not correlate with kidney function based on real-world data in patients with AS.

Site-specific assessment of spinal radiographic progression improves detection of TNF blocker-associated disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis: longitudinal observational data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry

OBJECTIVES

To analyse whether time-varying treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) has a differential impact on structural damage progression on different spinal segments (cervical versus lumbar spine).

METHODS

Patients with r-axSpA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort were included if cervical and lumbar radiographs were available at intervals of 2 years for a maximum of 10 years. Paired radiographs were scored by two calibrated readers according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The relationship between TNFi use and progression in the cervical and the lumbar spine was analysed using generalised estimating equation models and adjustment for potential confounding. Radiographic progression per spinal segment was defined as an increase of ≥ 1 mSASSS unit or by the formation of ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD symptom duration was 13.8 ± 9.8 years. Mean ± SD mSASSS progression per radiographic interval was 0.41 ± 1.69 units in the cervical spine and 0.45 ± 1.45 units in the lumbar spine (p = 0.66). Prior use of TNFi significantly reduced the odds of progression in the cervical spine by 68% (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.72), but not in the lumbar spine (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.52-1.88). A more restricted inhibition of progression in the lumbar spine was confirmed after multiple imputation of missing covariate data (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.41, for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). It was also confirmed with progression defined as formation of ≥ 1 syndesmophyte (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.80 versus OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.24 for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Disease modification by treatment with TNFi seems to more profoundly affect the cervical spine in this r-axSpA population with longstanding disease. Site-specific analysis of spinal progression might, therefore, improve detection of disease modification in clinical trials in axSpA.

Imrecoxib and celecoxib affect sacroiliac joint inflammation in axSpA by regulating bone metabolism and angiogenesis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the changes in the levels of bone metabolism markers related to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) after treatment with imrecoxib and celecoxib and evaluate their relationship with clinical efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with axSpA with at least 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) SIJ scans during a 12-week follow-up were enrolled. The levels of bone metabolism markers, including dickkopf-1(DKK-1), sclerostin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), osteoprotegerin (OPG), noggin, β-catenin, and RUNX2, were measured twice, and their association with disease activity and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) score for SIJ were analyzed by univariate analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients completed the follow-up. The levels of sclerostin, OPG, noggin, DKK-1, and RUNX2 were increased, whereas those of VEGF and β-catenin were decreased. The levels of sclerostin and OPG were negatively correlated with disease duration. The levels of VEGF and β-catenin were significantly decreased (F = 7.866, P = 0.003; F = 4.106, P = 0.047) in patients with disease remission. A decrease in ESR was significantly correlated with decreased levels of Runx2 and SPARCC scores, with the levels of sclerostin being significantly elevated in the SPARCC-reduced group. There were no statistically significant differences between the imrecoxib and celecoxib groups (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Imrecoxib and celecoxib affect SIJ inflammation, disease activity, and the course of disease by regulating bone metabolism and angiogenesis in axSpA. Key Points •After treatment with imrecoxib and celecoxib, the levels of sclerostin, OPG, noggin, DKK-1, and RUNX2 were increased, whereas those of VEGF and β-catenin were decreased, correlating with the course of disease, disease activity, and SIJ inflammation. • A decrease in ESR was significantly correlated with a decrease in the levels of RUNX2 and SIJ inflammation.. • The levels of sclerostin were more significantly elevated in SIJ inflammation remission group.. •Imrecoxib and celecoxib affect SIJ inflammation by regulating bone metabolism and angiogenesis in axSpA..

Spine Surgery and Ankylosing Spondylitis: Optimizing Perioperative Management

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common form of axial spondyloarthritis, characterized by inflammatory back pain, radiographic sacroiliitis, excess spinal bone formation, and a high prevalence of HLA-B27. Commonly, AS patients require spinal surgery for kyphotic deformities, spinal trauma, and spinal infections. For preoperative management, proper interruption considering each specific half-lives of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are necessary to avoid complications, such as infections. When feasible, bone quality assessment before surgery is mandatory. For intraoperative measurements, airway management should be carefully evaluated, especially in patients with severe cervical deformities. Cardiac, renal, and pulmonary assessment should be made considering specific pathologic characteristics involved in AS patients, such as pulmonary restrictive disease and chronic anti-inflammatory drugs use. Multimodal neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring is recommended once these patients had a high risk for neurological deterioration. At the postoperative period, early oral intake, early mobilization, and aggressive pain control may decrease complications and enhance recovery. AS presents several unique challenges that require specific attention around spine surgery. This includes handling preoperative and postoperative pharmacotherapeutics, intraoperative airway management, and the mitigation of postoperative complications. In this paper, we provide a literature review of optimal strategies for the perioperative management for patients with AS.

Randomized double-blinded controlled trial on the effect of synbiotic supplementation on IL-17/IL-23 pathway and disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 17 (IL17)-expressing CD4⁺ T cells and IL-17/IL-23 pathway play a key role in the pathogenesis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Synbiotics have been suggested due to their immunomodulatory effects in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was designed to assess the effects of synbiotic supplement on IL-17/IL-23 pathway and disease activity in patients with axSpA.

METHODS

Forty-eight axSpA patients were randomly allocated to use one synbiotic capsule or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Disease activity was assessed using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and ASAS-endorsed disease activity score-C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP). The secondary outcome was proportion of IL17-expressing CD4+ T cells, IL-17 and IL-23 gene expression, and supernatant levels of IL-17 and IL-23, which were measured at the baseline and end of the trial.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were randomized into the synbiotic and placebo groups. Thirty-eight patients completed the study. Synbiotic supplementation significantly reduced the proportion of IL17-expressing CD4⁺ T cells (4.88 ± 2.47 vs. 2.16 ± 1.25), gene expression of IL-17 (1.03 ± 0.24 vs. 0.65 ± 0.26) and IL-23 (1.01 ± 0.13 vs. 0.68 ± 0.24) and serum IL-17 (38.22 ± 14.40 vs. 24.38 ± 11.68) and IL-23 (51.77 ± 17.40 vs. 32.16 ± 12.46) compared with baseline. Significant differences between groups were noticed only in the proportion of IL17-expressing CD4⁺ T cells, and IL-17 and IL-23 gene expression. Synbiotic supplementation did not significantly alter BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP compared with baseline and placebo group at the end of trial.

CONCLUSION

Present study indicated beneficial effect of synbiotic supplement on IL-17/IL-23 pathway without improving disease activity in axSpApatients.HighlightsSynbiotic supplementation reduced IL17-expressing CD4⁺ T cells proportion in axSpA.Synbiotic supplementation decreased IL-17 and IL-23 gene expression in axSpA.Synbiotic supplementation did not change disease activity score in axSpA.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Biomarkers in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Observational Studies From the Program to Understand the Longterm Outcomes in Spondyloarthritis Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to assess the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting radiographic sacroiliitis and active disease in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to explore the association between use of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and these laboratory values compared with traditional inflammatory markers.

METHODS

Observational data from the Program to Understand the Longterm Outcomes in Spondyloarthritis (PULSAR) registry were analyzed. We generated receiver operating characteristic curves to calculate laboratory cutoff values; we used these values in multivariable logistic regression models to identify associations with radiographically confirmed sacroiliitis and active disease. We also used logistic regression to determine the likelihood of elevated laboratory values after initiation of TNFi.

RESULTS

Most study participants (n = 354) were White, male, and HLA-B27 positive. NLR (odds ratio [OR] 1.459, P = 0.034), PLR (OR 4.842, P < 0.001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 4.397, P < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level (OR 2.911, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis. Models that included PLR with traditional biomarkers performed better than those with traditional biomarkers alone. NLR (OR 6.931, P = 0.002) and CRP (OR 2.678, P = 0.004) were predictors of active disease, but the model that included both NLR and CRP performed better than CRP alone. TNFi use reduced the odds of elevated NLR (OR 0.172, P < 0.001), PLR (OR 0.073, P < 0.001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 0.319, P < 0.001), and CRP (OR 0.407, P < 0.001), but models that included NLR or PLR and traditional biomarkers performed best.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate an association between NLR and PLR and sacroiliitis and disease activity, with NLR and PLR showing response after TNFi treatment and adding useful clinical information to established biomarkers, thus perhaps assisting in management of axial SpA.

ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Following the EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures, two systematic literature reviews were conducted on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment of axSpA. In a task force meeting, the evidence was presented, discussed, and overarching principles and recommendations were updated, followed by voting.

RESULTS

Five overarching principles and 15 recommendations with a focus on personalised medicine were agreed: eight remained unchanged from the previous recommendations; three with minor edits on nomenclature; two with relevant updates (#9, 12); two newly formulated (#10, 11). The first five recommendations focus on treatment target and monitoring, non-pharmacological management and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-choice pharmacological treatment. Recommendations 6-8 deal with analgesics and discourage long-term glucocorticoids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for pure axial involvement. Recommendation 9 describes the indication of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs, that is, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i)) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs, ie, Janus kinase inhibitors) for patients who have Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ≥2.1 and failed ≥2 NSAIDs and also have either elevated C reactive protein, MRI inflammation of sacroiliac joints or radiographic sacroiliitis. Current practice is to start a TNFi or IL-17i. Recommendation 10 addresses extramusculoskeletal manifestations with TNF monoclonal antibodies preferred for recurrent uveitis or inflammatory bowel disease, and IL-17i for significant psoriasis. Treatment failure should prompt re-evaluation of the diagnosis and consideration of the presence of comorbidities (#11). If active axSpA is confirmed, switching to another b/tsDMARD is recommended (#12). Tapering, rather than immediate discontinuation of a bDMARD, can be considered in patients in sustained remission (#13). The last recommendations (#14, 15) deal with surgery and spinal fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2022 ASAS-EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance on the management of patients with axSpA.

Diagnostic value of anti-Kaiso autoantibody in axial spondyloarthritis

Objective

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic rheumatic disease predominantly characterized by inflammation and progressive structural damage. Patients are often diagnosed very late, which delays the optimal treatment period. Early diagnosis of axSpA, especially non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA), remains a major challenge. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of anti-Kaiso autoantibodies in axSpA and their correlation with clinical disease indicators.

Methods

Two pooled serum samples (seven patients with nr-axSpA and seven healthy controls) were profiled using HuProt arrays to investigate the diagnostic value of autoantibodies in nr-axSpA. Levels of anti-Kaiso autoantibodies in patients with axSpA and controls were determined using the Meso Scale Discovery assay system. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of anti-Kaiso autoantibodies in axSpA. Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlation between anti-Kaiso autoantibodies and clinical parameters.

Results

Seven candidate autoantibodies were present in the serum of patients with nr-axSpA. The levels of anti-Kaiso autoantibodies were significantly higher in the nr-axSpA group than in the other groups. It can differentiate nr-axSpA from ankylosing spondylitis (AS), healthy controls, and rheumatoid arthritis. The level of early-stage AS among patients with nr-axSpA decreased when they progressed to the late stage. Of all patients with axSpA, serum anti-Kaiso autoantibody levels were positively correlated with the C-reactive protein level and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score and negatively correlated with disease duration.

Conclusion

Anti-Kaiso autoantibody may be a valuable diagnostic biomarker for early-stage AS in the nr-axSpA period and may be a potential therapeutic target.

The use of tenoxicam in active axial spondyloarthritis – focus on efficacy and safety

Purpose of the study – to study the efficacy and safety of tenoxicam (Texared®) in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis.Material and methods. The study included 35 patients with active axial spondyloarthritis with BASDAI≥4.0. Patients were given continuous oral tenoxicam (Texared®, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories) at a dosage of 20 mg/day. Subsequently, 5 patients were excluded from the study due to discontinuation of the drug after 5–10 days of administration. 30 patients were included in the final analysis. Initially and after 30 days, to assess the severity of pain and stiffness, activity, patients filled out questionnaires in electronic form using Google forms, a general assessment of pain in the lower back and the intensity of night pain by the patient, subjective sleep characteristics were carried out. The doctor calculated the BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, BASMI indices, and evaluated the activity according to the doctor’s opinion. The baseline blood pressure level was determined, and a patient diary was issued for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the morning/evening for 30 days. After 30 days, the patient’s ambulatory blood pressure control was assessed. At baseline and after 30 days, biochemical blood parameters were studied, including a complete blood and urine test.Results and conclusion. In patients with axial spondyloarthritis with high and very high activity, a positive effect of tenoxicam (Texared®) therapy on disease activity was noted. The effect of Texared® develops with regular use already during the first 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks there is a clear decrease in the severity of pain in the lower back, a decrease in the duration of morning stiffness. The drug is well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile, no serious adverse events and few side effects that do not require discontinuation of therapy.

Results of two-year follow-up of patients with coxitis and axial spondyloarthritis. The effect of therapy on the progression of coxitis. Part II

Coxitis is one of the most common causes of early disability in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but the therapy for this condition has not been developed.

Goal. to assess the effect of different treatment regimens on the manifestations of coxitis in patients with axSpA. Material and methods. We analyzed 77 patients with axSpA (ASAS criteria 2009) (23 women and 54 men) followed for at least 2 years with clinical and/or instrumental signs of coxitis. Their average age was 30.8±7.7 years with an average duration of illness of 74.0±90.3 months. Positive for HLA-B27 were 72 (94%) patients. In all patients, the BASRI hip index was assessed for each HJ. The median values of laboratory indicators of inflammation of ESR and CRP were initially high (20.0 mm/h and 14.5 mg/l, respectively), but after 2 years the indicators decreased, including ESR to 8.0 mm/h, and CRP to 5.0 mg/l (p<0.05), what we described in the first message. According to the study design, all patients in the group were divided into three subgroups. In the first subgroup, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were regularly taken in therapeutic doses. The second subgroup included patients who were regularly taking NSAIDs and synthetic basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs). In the third subgroup, patients were observed with a recommendation to take NSAIDs and regular administration of genetically engineered biological drugs (bDMARDs). In the absence of the effect of therapy and the presence of indications, patients of the studied subgroups were transferred to therapy, which included regular intake of NSAIDs and / or DMARDs in combination with bDMARDs. Results: Baseline, 29 patients were included in the NSAID subgroup, 21 patients received combined therapy with DMARDs and NSAIDs, and 27 patients were treated with NSAIDs+bDMARDs, and 16 of them received them together with DMARDs. Initially, in subgroup 1, radiographic signs of coxitis were present in 6 patients (21%), in subgroup 2 – in 3 (14%), in subgroup 3 – in 10 (37%) patients. Progression of coxitis was noted in 12 (48%), and the number of patients with ssrK≥3 increased from 4 to 40% (p><0.05). By the end of the 2-year follow-up period, only 8 patients out of the initially included 21 patients in the chronic DMARD subgroup continued to be followed up. In this subgroup, a significant decrease in laboratory parameters, such as ESR>< 0.05), what we described in the first message. According to the study design, all patients in the group were divided into three subgroups. In the first subgroup, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were regularly taken in therapeutic doses. The second subgroup included patients who were regularly taking NSAIDs and synthetic basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs). In the third subgroup, patients were observed with a recommendation to take NSAIDs and regular administration of genetically engineered biological drugs (bDMARDs). In the absence of the effect of therapy and the presence of indications, patients of the studied subgroups were transferred to therapy, which included regular intake of NSAIDs and / or DMARDs in combination with bDMARDs. Results: Baseline, 29 patients were included in the NSAID subgroup, 21 patients received combined therapy with DMARDs and NSAIDs, and 27 patients were treated with NSAIDs+bDMARDs, and 16 of them received them together with DMARDs. Initially, in subgroup 1, radiographic signs of coxitis were present in 6 patients (21%), in subgroup 2 – in 3 (14%), in subgroup 3 – in 10 (37%) patients. Progression of coxitis was noted in 12 (48%), and the number of patients with ssrK≥3 increased from 4 to 40% (p<0.05). By the end of the 2-year follow-up period, only 8 patients out of the initially included 21 patients in the chronic DMARD subgroup continued to be followed up. In this subgroup, a significant decrease in laboratory parameters, such as ESR>< 0.05). By the end of the 2-year follow-up period, only 8 patients out of the initially included 21 patients in the chronic DMARD subgroup continued to be followed up. In this subgroup, a significant decrease in laboratory parameters, such as ESR and CRP (p<0.05), was obtained, but no other differences were obtained. In the NSAIDs+bDMARDs subgroup, during the two-year follow-up, the number of patients increased significantly from 27 to 44, of which 22 received DMARDs. A comparative analysis revealed a significant decrease in BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS-CRP, ESR and CRP (p><0.05), in this group there was no significant increase in patients with x-ray coxitis (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Therapy with bDMARDs preparations significantly reduces the rate of radiographic progression of coxitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in comparison with standard therapy (NSAIDs, sulfasalazine, methotrexate) of this disease.

An overview of psoriatic arthritis including clinical manifestations, assessment, diagnostic criteria, investigations, drug management and GRAPPA guidelines

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and often progressive inflammatory disease, occurring in up to 30% of patients with psoriasis. Assessment of patients with PsA requires consideration of all disease domains, including peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin psoriasis, psoriatic nail disease, uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease. Co-morbidities and related conditions should all be considered including: obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, anxiety/depression, liver disease, chronic infections, malignancy, osteoporosis, fibromyalgia and reproductive health.

Etanercept/celecoxib on improving MRI inflammation of active ankylosing spondylitis: A multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with etanercept and celecoxib alone/combined treatment.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in three medical centers in China. Adult AS patients with BASDAI ≥4 or ASDAS ≥2.1, CRP &gt;6 mg/L, or ESR 28 mm/1st hour were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to celecoxib 200 mg bid or etanercept 50 mg qw or combined therapy for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes were SPARCC change of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and spine and the proportion of patients achieving ASAS20 response at 52 weeks.

Results

Between September 2014 and January 2016, we randomly assigned 150 patients (mean age, 32.4 years; mean disease duration, 109 months), and 133 (88.6%) completed the study. SPARCC inflammation scores of the SIJ and spine decreased in the three groups, and significant differences were found between the combined group and the celecoxib group [between-group difference: −6.33, 95% CI (−10.56, −2.10) for SIJ; −9.53, 95% CI (−13.73, −5.33) for spine] and between the etanercept group and the celecoxib group [between-group difference: −5.02, 95% CI (−9.29, −0.76) for SIJ; −5.80, 95% CI (−10.04, −1.57) for spine]. The ASAS20 response rates were 44%, 58%, and 84% in the celecoxib, etanercept, and combined groups, respectively, and a significant difference was only found between the combined and the celecoxib groups.

Conclusion

Etanercept with or without celecoxib decreases inflammation detected by MRI at 1 year compared to celecoxib alone in active AS patients. The combination of etanercept and celecoxib was superior to celecoxib alone for the primary clinical response.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01934933.

Treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors is associated with a time-shifted retardation of radiographic spinal progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current study was to analyse the association between treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and radiographic spinal progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) from a long-term inception cohort.

METHODS

A total of 243 patients with axSpA from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort with at least two sets of spinal radiographs obtained at least 2 years apart during a 10-year follow-up were included. Spinal radiographs were evaluated by three trained and calibrated readers according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The association between the current TNFi, previous TNFi and radiographic spinal progression defined as the absolute mSASSS change score over 2 years was analysed using longitudinal generalised estimating equations analysis.

RESULTS

TNFi treatment in the current 2-year interval was not associated with retardation of radiographic spinal progression (β=-0.02 (95% CI -0.37 to 0.34) and -0.17 (95% CI -0.54 to 0.20) for any and ≥12 months treatment duration, respectively, adjusted for sex, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, smoking, presence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis, mSASSS at baseline and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake). TNFi treatment in the previous 2-year interval, was, however, significantly associated with reduction of mSASSS progression, which was especially evident in patients who received TNFi in the previous and in the current intervals: β=-0.58 (95% CI -1.02 to -0.13), adjusted for the same variables.

CONCLUSION

TNFi treatment was associated with a time-shifted effect on radiographic spinal progression in axSpA that became evident between years 2 and 4 after treatment initiation.

Inflammation, new bone formation and aorta

OBJECTIVES

This study describes the characteristics of vertebral osteophytes in different inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases aiming to reflect the aortic-vertebrae interaction.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study including 4 group of patients, ankylosing spondylitis (AS, n = 52), Takayasu's arteritis (TKA, n = 31), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH, n = 30), coronary artery disease (CAD, n = 10), 100 and also age-matched healthy controls (HC, n = 143). All subjects underwent a chest computed tomography scan and images of the upper and lower border of 7 adjacent thoracic vertebrae (T5 to T12) were captured. An "aorta ipsilateral ratio" (AIR) of the osteophyte was calculated as the area across the midline toward the aorta side divided by the total osteophyte area.

RESULTS

The frequency of subjects with osteophytes and osteophyte counts increased with age across the board. Frequencies of osteophytes in AS and TKA were much higher than age-matched HCs. The AIRs were significantly elevated in AS, TKA and CAD compared with DISH or age-matched HCs. In addition, the AIR of patients with higher C-reactive protein levels (>8 mg/L) were greater than those with lower levels, both among AS and CAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that, in an inflammatory niche, regardless of the origin or the grade of the inflammation, ossification will be facilitated and screwed toward the aorta. There is a possible mechanistic connection between large vessel and new bone formation in the context of inflammation.

Patient-reported adherence to physical exercises of patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Introduction

Studies on adherence to exercise therapy of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are rare, and the criteria for adherence to exercise are inconsistent. This study aimed to quantify patient-reported adherence to exercise therapy of Chinese outpatients with AS and investigate the factors related to poor adherence.

Methods

The subjects’ sociodemographic, disease-related, radiographic, and laboratory parameters were collected. Patients’ adherence to exercise therapy was assessed using the Exercise Attitude Questionnaire (EAQ) with a 4-point Likert scale. All cases were grouped as good adherence and poor adherence using a cutoff score of 60, according to a previous study. Univariate analysis was conducted to assess the intergroup differences. Then, we built a multivariate logistic regression model to identify possible significant factors related to poor adherence to exercise therapy.

Results

A total of 185 outpatients completed the questionnaire. The mean EAQ score was 49.4 (IQR, 40.7–59.3) and 146 patients (78.9%) were considered to have poor adherence, and 39 patients (21.1%) were considered to have good adherence. The rates of current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNF-i) use were significantly higher in the poor adherence group (p=0.001, p=0.027, p=0.018, respectively). Our multivariate logistic regression model revealed that the only significant associated factor was current use of NSAIDs (OR=3.517; p=0.016; 95% CI, 1.259–9.827).

Conclusions

Outpatients with AS had an unacceptable level of adherence to exercise therapy, and current use of NSAIDs was a significantly associated factor.

Key Points • Outpatients with AS had an unacceptable level of adherence to exercise therapy. • Current use of NSAIDs exerted a negative impact on patients’ adherence to exercise therapy.

Bone Involvement in Patients with Spondyloarthropathies

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are common systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, in which, as in other rheumatic diseases, levels of markers of bone resorption are elevated, leading to bone loss and elevated risk of vertebral fractures. However, the diseases are also associated with new bone formation in the spine, the so-called syndesmophytes. We tried to unravel the pathogenesis of formation and growth of syndesmophytes and evaluated new diagnostic and treatment options. After a successful meeting of the Working Group on Rheumatic Diseases at the ECTS 2020, we (WL and CR) were excited about the quality of the speakers (CM, JH, AG, and GL) and their complimentary lectures. Given the relative lack of reviews on spondyloarthropathies and bone, we decided to work together on a comprehensive review that might be interesting for basic scientists and clinically relevant for clinicians. Radiographic progression in axSpA is linked to several risk factors, like male sex, smoking, HLA-B-27, increased levels of CRP, presence of syndesmophytes, and marked inflammation on MRI. The potential role of mechanical stress in the context of physically demanding jobs has been also suggested to promote structural damages. Different treatment options from NSAIDs to biologic agents like TNF inhibitors (TNFi) or IL-17inhibitors (IL-17i) result in a reduction of inflammation and symptoms. However, all these different treatment options failed to show clear and reproducible results on inhibition on syndesmophyte formation. The majority of data are available on TNFi, and some studies suggested an effect in subgroups of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Less information is available on NSAIDs and IL-17i. Since IL-17i have been introduced quite recently, more studies are expected. IL-17 inhibitors (Il-17i) potently reduce signs and symptoms, but serum level of IL-17 is not elevated, therefore, IL-17 probably has mainly a local effect. The failure of anti-IL-23 in axSpA suggests that IL-17A production could be independent from IL-23. It may be upregulated by TNFα, resulting in lower expression of DKK1 and RANKL and an increase in osteogenesis. In active AS markers of bone resorption are increased, while bone formation markers can be increased or decreased. Bone Turnover markers and additional markers related to Wnt such as DKK1, sclerostin, and RANKL are valuable for elucidating bone metabolism on a group level and they are not (yet) able to predict individual patient outcomes. The gold standard for detection of structural lesions in clinical practice is the use of conventional radiographics. However, the resolution is low compared to the change over time and the interval for detecting changes are 2 years or more. Modern techniques offer substantial advantages such as the early detection of bone marrow edema with MRI, the fivefold increased detection rate of new or growing syndesmophytes with low-dose CT, and the decrease in 18F-fluoride uptake during treatment with TNFα-inhibitors (TNFi) in a pilot study in 12 AS patients. Detection of bone involvement by new techniques, such as low-dose CT, MRI and 18-Fluoride PET-scans, and bone turnover markers, in combination with focusing on high-risk groups such as patients with early disease, elevated CRP, syndesmophytes at baseline, male patients and patients with HLA-B27 + are promising options for the near future. However, for optimal prevention of formation of syndesmophytes we need more detailed insight in the pathogenesis of bone formation in axSpA and probably more targeted therapies.

Treatment of axial spondyloarthritis: an update

Diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has vastly improved over the past two decades. With advances in the discernment of immunopathogenesis of this disease, new therapies have become available, which are associated with substantial improvement in symptoms, signs and quality of life. The four broad categories of approved treatment options are physical therapy and exercise (which have been known to be beneficial for millennia), NSAIDs (since the 1950s), TNF inhibitors (first FDA approval in 2003) and IL-17 inhibitors (first FDA approval in 2016). In addition, there have been a host of new developments in the axSpA field, including new treatment guidelines, the FDA approval of three biologic DMARDs to treat non-radiographic axSpA, the FDA and EMA approval of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis, new data on the effect of biologic DMARDs on structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis, strategy trials on tapering or stopping TNF inhibitors in patients in remission, trials of treat-to-target strategy in axSpA, and several new molecules in phase III studies. This Review explores the developments in the management of axSpA.

Efficacy and safety of Fengshi Gutong Capsule in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: A 4-week randomized controlled, double-blinded, double-dummy trial

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Fengshi Gutong Capsule (FSGTC) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine that is composed of seven herbs. It has been widely used for the treatment of joint pain in China. However, the clinical evidence supporting its use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is lacking.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of FSGTC in the treatment of AS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded, double-dummy trial enrolled patients with active AS defined as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease ActivityIndex (BASDAI) ≥ 4 or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) ≥ 2.1. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) into combination group (FSGTC plus imrecoxib), FSGTC group (FSGTC plus imrecoxib placebo) or imrecoxib group (imrecoxib plus FSGTC placebo) over a 4-week treatment. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome measure of the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20% (ASAS20) response at week 4. The secondary endpoints included ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGTA) and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 180 randomized patients, 159 patients (88.3%) completed the 4-week treatment. ASAS20 response rate at week 4 was achieved by 27.5% in imrecoxib group, compared with 37.0% in combination group (P > 0.05) and 37.0% in FSGTC group (P > 0.05). In comparison to imrecoxib group, there were significantly greater improvements of ASDAS-CRP and PTGA in combination group and greater improvement of ASDAS-CRP in FSGTC group while the rest of the secondary endpoints shown similar improvement. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events in imrecoxib group (15.7%) was significantly higher than that of FSGTC group (1.9%) and without a significant difference to combination group (7.4%).

CONCLUSION

FSGTC alone or combined with NSAIDs has therapeutic efficacy in decreasing disease activity of active AS patients and with good gastrointestinal tolerability after 4-week of treatment.

Vitronectin-derived bioactive peptide prevents spondyloarthritis by modulating Th17/Treg imbalance in mice with curdlan-induced spondyloarthritis

Purpose

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a systemic inflammatory arthritis mediated mainly by interleukin (IL)-17. The vitronectin-derived bioactive peptide, VnP-16, exerts an anti-osteoporotic effect via β1 and αvβ3 integrin signaling. SpA is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, and we investigated the effect of VnP-16 in mice with SpA.

Methods

SpA was induced by curdlan in SKG ZAP-70^W163C mice, which were treated with vehicle, celecoxib, VnP-16, or VnP-16+celecoxib. The clinical score, arthritis score, spondylitis score, and proinflammatory cytokine expression of the spine were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Type 17 helper T cell (Th17) and regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation in the spleen was evaluated by flow cytometry and in the spine by confocal staining. Splenocyte expression of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 and pSTAT3 was evaluated by in vitro Western blotting.

Results

The clinical score was significantly reduced in the VnP16+celecoxib group. The arthritis and spondylitis scores were significantly lower in the VnP-16 and VnP16+celecoxib groups than the vehicle group. In the spine, the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and IL-17 expression were reduced and Th17/Treg imbalance was regulated in the VnP-16 alone and VnP-16+celecoxib groups. Flow cytometry of splenocytes showed increased polarization of Tregs in the VnP-16+celecoxib group. In vitro, VnP-16 suppressed pSTAT3.

Conclusions

VnP-16 plus celecoxib prevented SpA progression in a mouse model by regulating the Th17/Treg imbalance and suppressing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines.

[Axial spondyloarthritis : Update on management based on the interdisciplinary S3 guidelines on axial spondyloarthritis including early forms and ankylosing spondylitis]

This review article presents the innovations in the update of the S3 guidelines on axial spondylarthritis. The total of eight new recommendations address the areas of the consideration of differential diagnoses, coordination of comorbidity management, including a vaccination strategy, treatment targets, safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), treatment response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) and discontinuation strategies when remission has been achieved. In this article the authors deal particularly with the areas of early diagnosis and referral as well as exercise therapy and drug treatment.

Changes over time in inflammatory and structural lesions at the sacroiliac joint in children with spondyloarthritis exposed and unexposed to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

BACKGROUND

The objective of this work was to describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes over time in inflammatory and structural lesions at the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) in children with spondyloarthritis (SpA) exposed and unexposed to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study of SpA patients with suspected or confirmed sacroiliitis who underwent at ≥2 pelvic MRI scans. Images were reviewed independently by 3 radiologists and scored for inflammatory and structural changes using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) SIJ inflammation score (SIS) and structural score (SSS). Longitudinal, quantitative changes in patient MRI scans were measured using descriptive statistics and stratified by TNFi exposure. We used an average treatment effects (ATE) regression model to explore the average effect of TNFi exposure over time on inflammatory and structural lesions, adjusting for baseline lesion scores.

RESULTS

Forty-six subjects were evaluated using the SIS (n = 45) and SSS (n = 18). Median age at baseline imaging was 13.6 years, 63% were male and 71% were white. Twenty-three subjects (50%) were TNFi exposed between MRI studies. The median change in SIS in TNFi exposed and unexposed subjects with a baseline SIS ≥0 was - 20.7 and - 14.3, respectively (p = 0.09). Eleven (85%) TNFi exposed and 8 (89%) unexposed subjects with a baseline SIS ≥0 met the SIS minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥2.5). Using the ATE model adjusted for baseline SIS, the average effect of TNFi on SIS in patients with a baseline SIS ≥2 was - 14.5 (p < 0.01). Unadjusted erosion change score was significantly worse in TNFi unexposed versus exposed subjects (p = 0.03) but in the ATE model the effect of TNFi was not significant.

CONCLUSION

This study quantitatively describes how lesions in the SIJs on MRI change over time in patients exposed to TNFi versus unexposed. Follow-up imaging in TNFi exposed patients showed greater improvement than the unexposed group by most metrics, some of which reached statistical significance. Surprisingly, a majority of TNFi unexposed children with a baseline SIS≥2 met the SIS MCID. Additional studies assessing the short and long-term effects of TNFi on inflammatory and structural changes in juvenile SpA are needed.

Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and systemic immune disease characterized by inflammation of peripheral and/or axial joints and entheses in patients with psoriasis (PsO). Extra-articular and extracutaneous manifestations and numerous comorbidities can also be present. These recommendations replace the previous version published in May 2013. A systematic review of the literature retrieved 191 articles that were used to formulate 12 recommendations in response to 12 clinical questions, divided into 4 sections: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment, conventional drug therapy and biologic therapy. These guidelines provide evidence-based information on the clinical management for PsA patients. For each recommendation, the level of evidence (highest available), degree of strength (Oxford) and degree of expert agreement (interrater reliability) are reported.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-sparing effect of secukinumab in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year results from the MEASURE 2, 3 and 4 phase III trials

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to reduce pain and inflammation, and are considered the cornerstone of pharmacological intervention in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA); however, the long-term use of NSAIDs is debatable due to their restricted therapeutic potential and the risk of side effects and complications. Therefore, reduction in NSAID intake is desirable in r-axSpA patients. Here, we report the long-term NSAID-sparing effect of secukinumab over 4 years in patients with r-axSpA. This post hoc analysis pooled data from 3 secukinumab trials (MEASURE 2-4) for each secukinumab maintenance dose of 150 and 300 mg, regardless of the loading dose regimen being i.v. or s.c. NSAID intake was evaluated prospectively using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID score. Patients with an ASAS-NSAID score > 0 at baseline were analysed. NSAID-sparing endpoints included the mean change in the ASAS-NSAID score, the proportion of patients achieving 50% reduction, and the proportion of patients with an ASAS-NSAID score < 10. Percentages of patients who achieved BASDAI ≤ 2 were also assessed. Overall, 562 patients were included in this pooled analysis (secukinumab: 150 mg, N = 467; 300 mg, N = 95). The mean ASAS-NSAID score decreased with time in both the secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg dose groups. The proportion of patients who achieved 50% reduction in the ASAS-NSAID score and clinically meaningful reduction of ASAS-NSAID score < 10 increased with time in both dose groups and in both low and high NSAID intake patients. The percentage of patients with a clinically relevant improvement (BASDAI ≤ 2) was consistently higher in patients with an ASAS-NSAID score < 10 than in patients with an ASAS-NSAID score ≥ 10. Secukinumab provided sustained, long-term NSAID-sparing effects in patients with r-axSpA for up to 4 years of treatment, as measured using the ASAS-NSAID score. Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01649375 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01649375 ); NCT02008916 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02008916 ); NCT02159053 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02159053 ).

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) persistence and reasons for discontinuation in a predominantly male cohort with axial spondyloarthritis

Although tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have favorably altered the treatment landscape for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), there is limited data regarding TNFi persistence and reasons for discontinuation. This is an observational time-to-event study utilizing data collected for a prospective multiple-disease registry of US Veterans with axSpA treated with TNFi therapies and recruited over a 10 year period. Clinical, serological, and comorbid parameters were collected. Corporate Data Warehouse Pharmacy files provided courses of the 5 TNFi agents, and response to treatment was documented. Individual TNFi persistence was established utilizing univariate and multivariate Cox proportional models, and reasons for discontinuation were obtained by physician chart review. Two-hundred and fifty-five axSpA patients received 731 TNFi courses. A majority of patients (84.3%) had TNFi persistence at 12 months; 63.5% and 47.1% at 24 and 36 months, respectively. Compared to adalimumab, infliximab demonstrated greater persistence, certolizumab the least. Age, smoking status, BMI, comorbidity burden, inflammatory markers and HLA-B27 did not predict TNFi persistence or discontinuation. Stroke and peripheral arterial disease increased the probability of TNFi discontinuation. Secondary non-response (SNR) was the most common reason for discontinuation (46% of all courses); non-adherence (6%) and clinical remission (2%) were uncommon. Pain score at enrollment, myocardial infarction, African American race and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) predicted TNFi response. While initial persistence of TNFi treatment was high, a large proportion of the patients discontinued initial TNFi therapy by 3 years, primarily due to loss of efficacy. While further research identifying potential predictors of TNFi discontinuation in axSpA is warranted, access to alternate disease-modifying therapies is needed.

Opioid use frequency in early axial spondyloarthritis in Finland - a pharmacoepidemic register study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate opioid use among incident axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients compared to general population.

METHODS

From the national register, we identified all adult patients with axSpA (ICD-10 codes M45-46), who between 2010 and 2014 (index date, ID) were for the first time granted special reimbursement for any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Three matched population controls were identified for each patient. Drug purchases were evaluated between 2009-15, and opioid use was analyzed for one year before and after the ID. The Defined Daily Dose (DDD) was used as a tool to assess the opioid consumption before and after the biological (b) DMARD initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 3,577 axSpA patients and 10,573 controls. Of these patients, 97.2% started a conventional synthetic (cs) DMARD during a year after ID and 23.4% switched later to a self-injected bDMARD between the ID and 31 Dec 2015 (median follow-up 3.4 years). Opioids were purchased at least once by 29.8% and 21.7% of the patients in the years before and after the ID, respectively, compared to 8.1% and 7.8% of the controls. The proportion of opioid-using patients was greatest during the last quarter before the ID [relative risk (RR) 4.72 (95% CI 4.14 to 5.39)] compared to controls, and it remained higher [RR 2.84 (2.59 to 3.11)] also after the start of csDMARDs. DDD of opioid consumption decreased from 7.7 to 1.6/1,000 inhabitants after bDMARD initiation.

CONCLUSION

Considerably more axSpA patients than population controls used opioids. The opioid consumption by dose decreased clearly after bDMARD initiation.

Axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) encompasses both radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA. It is a chronic inflammatory disease with a predilection for involving the axial skeleton. The most common presenting symptoms are chronic back pain and spinal stiffness but peripheral and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations occur also frequently. The diagnosis of axSpA relies on the recognition of a clinical pattern of the disease, based on clinical, laboratory and imaging features. The Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axSpA are valid and well implemented for research purposes. Sustained disease activity, measured by validated tools such as the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, leads to irreversible structural damage and poor functioning and therefore should be abrogated. As part of the management algorithm, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain as the first line of pharmacological treatment besides physiotherapy. As a second line, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and interleukin-17 inhibitor are available but recently Janus kinase inhibitors have also shown efficacy in improving symptoms of the disease.

The Italian Society for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

Over the last few years, the landscape of treatments for axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) has been rapidly evolving, urging international scientific societies to draft or update existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the management of axial SpA. The Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR) committed to provide revised and adapted evidence- and expert-based recommendations for the management of patients with axial SpA in Italy. A systematic approach to the adaptation of existing CPGs - the ADAPTE methodology - was adopted to obtain updated recommendations suitable for the Italian context. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline and Embase databases to find international CPGs and consensus statements with recommendations for the management of axial SpA published in the previous five years. A working group composed of rheumatologists with proven experience in the management of axial SpA and methodologists identified the key research questions which guided study selection and data extraction. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. The Italian recommendations were developed by endorsing or adapting and rewording some existing recommendations. The draft of the recommendations was sent to a multidisciplinary group of external reviewers for comment and rating. Six original CPGs were selected and used to create this SIR CPG, which includes a final set of 14 recommendations covering the management of patients with axial SpA across the following domains: assessment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, and follow-up. The dissemination and implementation of these SIR recommendations are expected to support an evidencebased clinical approach to the management of patients with axial SpA in Italy.

Similarities and Differences Between Juvenile and Adult Spondyloarthropathies

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a broad spectrum of conditions occurring from childhood to middle age. Key features of SpA include axial and peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, extra-articular manifestations, and a strong association with HLA-B27. These features are common across the ages but there are important differences between juvenile and adult onset disease. Juvenile SpA predominantly affects the peripheral joints and the incidence of axial arthritis increases with age. Enthesitis is important in early disease. This review article highlights the similarities and differences between juvenile and adult SpA including classification, pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging, therapeutic strategies, and disease outcomes. In addition, the impact of the biological transition from childhood to adulthood is explored including the importance of musculoskeletal and immunological maturation. We discuss how the changes associated with adolescence may be important in explaining age-related differences in the clinical phenotype between juvenile and adult SpA and their implications for the treatment of juvenile SpA.