Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with probable rheumatoid arthritis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Induction of Cure in Early Arthritis (I CEA): study protocol for an investigator-initiated randomized single-blind clinical trial with open-label extension to compare three treatment strategies in patients with newly diagnosed undifferentiated arthritis

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated arthritis (UA) is a term used to describe patients with inflammatory arthritis that has not differentiated into a specific rheumatic disease. UA may be a pre-stage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or another inflammatory disease or remain undifferentiated, but a substantial proportion of patients may also achieve spontaneous remission. As UA may be an early presentation of RA, rheumatologists often start methotrexate (or another csDMARD) as early as possible. There are however very little data on the potential benefits of early DMARD treatment, and longitudinal data suggests that long-term outcomes such as physical functioning hardly improved in these patients in the past decades. In the I CEA trial, we investigate if it is beneficial to start early treatment with MTX or baricitinib, a more rapidly acting drug with a broader mechanism of action, compared to waiting for spontaneous remission with symptomatic therapy in patients with UA.

METHODS

The I CEA is a multicenter single-blind (independent assessor) randomized clinical trial with a 3-month interventional and 9-month observational follow-up period. The study includes patients with early (< 1 year symptom duration) DMARD-naïve undifferentiated arthritis. Patients with an increased risk of AEs with baricitinib treatment are excluded. Participants are randomized 1:1:1 to (1) symptom relief with NSAIDs and a single injection of glucocorticoids and (waiting for spontaneous remission); (2) methotrexate and a single injection of glucocorticoids, and NSAIDs are optional; and (3) baricitinib and a single injection of glucocorticoids and NSAIDs are optional. During the observational follow-up period, patients are treated in shared decision with their rheumatologist. The primary outcome will be the change in DAS at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include radiographic progression, physical functioning, patient-reported outcomes, cost utilities, safety, progression to classifiable RA, and disease activity over time.

DISCUSSION

The 12-month I CEA trial studies early treatment of patients with UA with methotrexate, baricitinib, or NSAIDs. The study initially had a more complex design. Emerging safety warnings about baricitinib necessitated adjustment of the trial protocol including more extensive exclusion criteria. The number of included patients was lower than initially planned, supported by an updated sample size calculation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch trial register NL73202.058.20, EudraCT 2019-004359-35, registered 10-06-2020. Protocol version 1Q, 06-05-2024.

Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis in At-Risk Individuals: Current Status and Future Prospects

Early intervention has been the cornerstone of improving outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Over the past decade, the boundaries have been pushed in an attempt to achieve effective prevention strategies in those who are at high risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Core risk factors including the presence of serum anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, arthralgia and subclinical inflammation on imaging are highly predictive of arthritis development. The influence of air pollution, diet and the role of microbiome on disease progression are less clear. In turn, therapeutic focus has shifted to an earlier pre-arthritis phase of the disease continuum where the clinically apparent arthritis may potentially be intercepted. Seven proof-of-concept interventional trials in at-risk individuals have been conducted so far. Whether true prevention of rheumatoid arthritis is possible remains elusive. Promising signals towards permanent disease modulation and improvement in symptom burden were seen with some immunomodulatory therapies, whilst others were unsuccessful. Long-term follow-up is required to ascertain a true effect. Looking forward, a better understanding of the natural history and underlying biological mechanisms of arthritis development and more accurate, validated risk stratification is needed.

Rheumatoid arthritis prevention in arthralgia: fantasy or reality?

The concept of a 'window of opportunity' in treating a disease assumes the existence of a time frame during which the trajectory of the disease can be effectively and permanently modified. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), optimal timing of this period is presumed to be during the phase before arthritis is clinically apparent and disease is diagnosed. Several proof-of-concept trials of treatment during the 'arthralgia' phase of RA have been completed in the past 4 years, with the underlying notion that temporary treatment at this stage could prevent the development of RA or induce a sustained reduction in the burden of disease. This Review summarizes the results of these trials and reflects on the outcomes in relation to the patients' perspectives. Overall, the majority of symptomatic at-risk individuals could benefit from a fixed period treatment, even if RA does not develop. Various factors must be taken into consideration when translating these findings into clinical practice. More evidence is needed to target the individuals at highest risk, and additional tools are needed to monitor treatment and guide decisions about whether treatment can be discontinued. Without these tools, there is a paradoxical risk of seemingly increasing the incidence of the disease and prolonging disease duration, which is the opposite of what the concept of intervening in the window of opportunity entails.

Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: still a challenge for the rheumatologist

Increased research over the past 30 years has greatly improved the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical aspects of autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis, resulting in improved management and outcomes. In contrast, the subset of rheumatoid arthritis that does not have autoantibodies (such as rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies) remains less well defined in its pathogenic mechanisms. Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis continues to pose diagnostic challenges, might respond differently to therapies, and appears to be burdened with different comorbidities and outcomes. The clear separation of rheumatoid arthritis according to serotypes is still a subject of uncertainty and controversy, and studies specifically focused on comparing rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis-like arthritides that do not have autoantibodies remain scarce. The purpose of this Review is to summarise the peculiarities that make autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis different from its autoantibody-positive counterpart, with the aim of generating debate and stimulating further research on this challenging condition.

When Autoantibodies Are Missing: The Challenge of Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis

Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) is characterized by the absence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies against the cyclic citrullinated protein (ACPA) in serum. However, the differences between the two forms of RA are more complex and have not yet been definitively characterized. Several lines of evidences support the idea that there are specific elements of the two forms, including genetic background, epidemiology, pathogenesis, severity of progression over time, and response to therapy. Clinical features that may differentiate SNRA from SPRA are also suggested by data obtained from classical radiology and newer imaging techniques. Although new evidence seems to provide additional help in differentiating the two forms of RA, their distinguishing features remain largely elusive. It should also be emphasized that the distinctive features of RA forms, if not properly recognized, can lead to the underdiagnosis of SNRA, potentially missing the period called the "window of opportunity" that is critical for early diagnosis, timely treatment, and better prognosis. This review aims to summarize the data provided in the scientific literature with the goal of helping clinicians diagnose SNRA as accurately as possible, with emphasis on the most recent findings available.

Lumbrical muscle enhancement on MRI and its association with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the significance of lumbrical muscle enhancement (LME) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blinded to the diagnoses, contrast-enhanced bilateral hand MRIs of patients with suspected early RA between 2014 and 2019 were reviewed by two observers for the presence and degree (weak/strong) of LME. The presence of other inflammatory findings was also noted. The patients were then stratified into RA (n = 41), control (n = 31), and other arthritides groups(n = 28) based on their final diagnoses in the hospital records within the following 12 months. Categorical variables were compared by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Differences among the groups were evaluated by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests. When the p-value from the Kruskal-Wallis test was statistically significant, multiple comparison test was used to identify group differences. Correlations between LME and flexor tenosynovitis were evaluated by Spearman rank correlation test. The agreement between two observers was assessed by Cohen's Kappa (κ) statistic. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 100 patients (88 females) with mean age of 47.2 ± 11.2. There were no significant differences for age or sex between groups (p = 0.17, p = 0.84, respectively). RA patients showed significantly more frequent (p < 0.001) and stronger LME (p = 0.001). There were no correlations between LME and flexor tenosynovitis (p > 0.05). Interrater agreement for the degree of LME on right and left sides was substantial (κ = 0.74, κ = 0.67, respectively).

CONCLUSION

RA patients demonstrated significantly more frequent and stronger LME with substantial interrater agreement. LME could constitute a subtle radiological clue for early RA.

Predictors of the likelihood that patients with rheumatoid arthritis will communicate information about rheumatoid arthritis risk to relatives: A quantitative assessment

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are increasingly recruited to prediction and prevention studies. Access to FDRs is usually via their proband with RA. Quantitative data on predictors of family risk communication are lacking. RA patients completed a questionnaire assessing likelihood of communicating RA risk information to their FDRs, demographic variables, disease impact, illness perceptions, autonomy preferences, interest in FDRs taking a predictive test for RA, dispositional openness, family functioning, and attitudes towards predictive testing. Ordinal regression examined associations between patients' characteristics and their median likelihood of communicating RA risk to FDRs. Questionnaires were completed by 482 patients. The majority (75.1%) were likely/extremely likely to communicate RA risk information to FDRs, especially their children. Decision-making preferences, interest in FDRs taking a predictive test, and beliefs that risk knowledge would increase people's empowerment over their health increased patients' odds of being likely to communicate RA risk information to FDRs. Beliefs that risk information would cause stress to their relatives decreased odds that patients would be likely to communicate RA risk. These findings will inform the development of resources to support family communication about RA risk.

Prevention of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review of preventive strategies in at-risk individuals

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by symmetrical peripheral polyarthritis in the hands and/or feet, leading to long-term disability if not treated effectively. RA is preceded by a preclinical phase, in which genetically predisposed individuals accumulate environmental risk factors, and during which autoimmunity develops, followed by the emergence of non-specific signs and symptoms before arthritis becomes manifest. Early treatment in at-risk individuals - i.e. before the disease is fully established - has the theoretical potential to delay or prevent disease onset, with a positive impact on both patients' life and society.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to understand the feasibility of preventive treatment in at-risk individuals, taking into account recently performed studies and ongoing clinical trials, as well as patient perspectives.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) on Medline and Embase, searching articles published between 2010 and 2021 with the following key-words: "Rheumatoid arthritis", "arthralgia", "pre-treatment" or "prevent".

RESULTS

Our SLR identified a total of 1821 articles. Articles were independently screened by two researchers. A total of 14 articles were included after screening, and an additional 8 reports were manually included. We identified ten relevant clinical trials performed in at-risk individuals, or in individuals with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis. Although no treatment was shown to prevent RA onset, early treatment with rituximab and abatacept delayed onset of full-blown RA, and both conventional and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) decreased disease-related physical limitations and increased DAS28-defined remission, at least temporarily.

CONCLUSIONS

This SLR demonstrates that early treatment of at-risk individuals may be effective in delaying RA onset, thereby decreasing disease-related limitations in individuals in the pre-clinical phase of RA. Whether this may ultimately lead to prevention of RA remains to be determined.

Subclinical bowel inflammation increases healthcare resources utilization and steroid use before diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Previous data support that the inflammatory process underlying ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) can start years before the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine if patients with an incidental diagnosis of UC or CD demonstrate an increase in healthcare utilization in the years preceding the symptomatic onset of the disease.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, retrospective, hospital-based, case-control study. Patients with an incidental diagnosis of UC or CD during the colorectal cancer screening program at 9 hospitals were included. Cases were matched 1:3 and compared separately with two control populations: one including healthy non-IBD subjects adjusted by gender, age, and date, excluding those with visits to Gastroenterology; and a second control cohort of UC/CD patients with symptomatic onset.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients with preclinical inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were included (87 UC, 30 CD, 7 IBD unclassified; median age 56 years). Patients with preclinical IBD showed an increase in the number of visits to Primary Care up to 3 and 5 years before diagnosis (aIRR 1.59, 95% CI [1.37-1.86], p = 0.001; aIRR 1.43, 95% CI [1.24-1.67], p = 0.01) and more frequent use of steroids (aOR 2.84, 95% CI [1.21-6.69], p = 0.03; aOR 2.25, 95% CI [1.06-4.79], p = 0.04) compared to matched non-IBD healthy controls, respectively. In contrast, patients with a symptomatic onset visited Primary Care less frequently, but they had an increase in the number of visits to Emergency Department, specialist care, sick-leaves, CT/ultrasound examinations, and use of antibiotics or systemic steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased need for medical assistance and use of systemic steroids during the presymptomatic phase of IBD. These results will help in establishing new tools for early identification of IBD in the future.

Clinical course in patients with chronic undifferentiated arthritis of the elbow after arthroscopic synovectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment can be considered for patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) limited to the elbow joint. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic synovectomy.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who underwent arthroscopic synovectomy for chronic UA of the elbow between 2006 and 2019 were enrolled in this study. One patient was excluded because of evidence of tuberculosis in the biopsy. Chronic UA of the elbow was defined as (1) localized synovitis diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging, (2) no specific cause, and (3) no response to conservative treatment for >3 months. We compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes between the remission and disease progression groups.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, synovitis was controlled in 13 patients. In 5 patients, the symptoms disappeared after surgery without any medical treatment. Four patients discontinued disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Nine patients were classified as in remission. The disease progression group had a longer symptom duration, elevated rheumatoid markers, and higher Larsen grading. However, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic synovectomy achieved remission in approximately 47% of patients with chronic UA of the elbow. Although arthroscopic synovectomy did not prevent RA, it can be considered for rapid resolution of synovitis and diagnostic purposes.

From the prodromal stage of multiple sclerosis to disease prevention

A prodrome is an early set of signs or symptoms that indicate the onset of a disease before more typical symptoms develop. Prodromal stages are well recognized in some neurological and immune-mediated diseases such as Parkinson disease, schizophrenia, type 1 diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis. Emerging evidence indicates that a prodromal stage exists in multiple sclerosis (MS), raising the possibility of intervention at this stage to delay or prevent the development of classical MS. However, much remains unclear about the prodromal stage of MS and considerable research is needed to fully characterize the prodrome and develop standardized criteria to reliably identify individuals with prodromal MS who are at high risk of progressing to a diagnosis of MS. In this Roadmap, we draw on work in other diseases to propose a disease framework for MS that incorporates the prodromal stage, and set out key steps and considerations needed in future research to fully characterize the MS prodrome, identify early disease markers and develop standardized criteria that will enable reliable identification of individuals with prodromal MS, thereby facilitating trials of interventions to slow or stop progression beyond the prodrome.

Phytochemicals from medicinal plants from African forests with potentials in rheumatoid arthritis management

OBJECTIVES

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation, pain, and cartilage and bone damage. There is currently no cure for RA. It is however managed using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, often with severe side effects. Hidden within Africa's lush vegetation are plants with diverse medicinal properties including anti-RA potentials. This paper reviews the scientific literature for medicinal plants, growing in Africa, with reported anti-RA activities and identifies the most abundant phytochemicals deserving research attention. A search of relevant published scientific literature, using the major search engines, such as Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, etc. was conducted to identify medicinal plants, growing in Africa, with anti-RA potentials.

KEY FINDINGS

Twenty plants belonging to 17 families were identified. The plants are rich in phytochemicals, predominantly quercetin, rutin, catechin, kaempferol, etc., known to affect some pathways relevant in RA initiation and progression, and therefore useful in its management.

SUMMARY

Targeted research is needed to unlock the potentials of medicinal plants by developing easy-to-use technologies for preparing medicines from them. Research attention should focus on how best to exploit the major phytochemicals identified in this review for the development of anti-RA 'green pharmaceuticals'.

Comparison of Web-Based Advertising and a Social Media Platform as Recruitment Tools for Underserved and Hard-to-Reach Populations in Rheumatology Clinical Research

Objective

Traditional nondigital methods of participant recruitment for clinical research studies in rheumatology can be costly and inefficient, particularly for recruitment of underserved populations. We aimed to address this need by evaluating two methods of online recruitment to an observational cohort of individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis, namely web and Facebook advertisements.

Methods

A 3‐month countywide web‐based recruitment campaign was conducted consisting of text and image‐based advertisements. Similar advertisements were subsequently displayed on Facebook, initially in English for 5 months and later in Spanish for an additional 3 months. Individuals who clicked on advertisements were directed to a website landing page containing study information and could contact study personnel to schedule testing for anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide‐3 (CCP3). The primary outcome measure for each campaign was the click‐through rate.

Results

During the web campaign, 413,289 advertisement impressions were displayed, resulting in 428 clicks (click‐through rate 0.10%) and only one screened participant. During the English Facebook campaign, 724,815 advertisements were displayed with 6765 clicks (click‐through rate 0.93%) and 43 screened participants, significantly greater than the web campaign (P < 0.001). During the Spanish advertisement campaign, 255,730 Spanish advertisements were displayed, resulting in a click‐through rate of 2.09% and 24 screened participants, a significantly higher rate than English advertisements. Of participants recruited through social media, 94% were female and 29.8% were Spanish speakers.

Conclusion

Facebook advertisements were superior to web advertisements for participant recruitment. Spanish Facebook advertisements had a greater click‐through rate than English Facebook advertisements. Facebook was an effective recruitment method, particularly for Spanish speakers.

The synovial and blood monocyte DNA methylomes mirror prognosis, evolution and treatment in early arthritis

Identifying predictive biomarkers at early stages of inflammatory arthritis is crucial for starting appropriate therapies to avoid poor outcomes. Monocytes (MOs) and macrophages, largely associated with arthritis, are contributors and sensors of inflammation through epigenetic modifications. In this study, we investigated associations between clinical features and DNA methylation in blood and synovial fluid (SF) MOs in a prospective cohort of patients with early inflammatory arthritis. DNA methylation profiles of undifferentiated arthritis (UA) blood MOs exhibited marked alterations in comparison with those from healthy donors. We identified additional differences both in blood and SF MOs after comparing patients with UA grouped by their future outcomes, i.e., good versus poor. Patient profiles in subsequent visits revealed a reversion toward a healthy level in both groups, those requiring disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and those who remitted spontaneously. Changes in disease activity between visits also affected DNA methylation, which was partially concomitant in the SF of UA and in blood MOs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Epigenetic similarities between arthritis types allow a common prediction of disease activity. Our results constitute a resource of DNA methylation–based biomarkers of poor prognosis, disease activity, and treatment efficacy for the personalized clinical management of early inflammatory arthritis.

Study of Plasma Anti-CD26 Autoantibody Levels in a Cohort of Treatment-Naïve Early Arthritis Patients

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the identification of biomarkers to adjust treatment intensity and to correctly diagnose the disease in early stages still constitutes a challenge and, as such, novel biomarkers are needed. We proposed that autoantibodies (aAbs) against CD26 (DPP4) might have both etiological importance and clinical value. Here, we perform a prospective study of the potential diagnostic power of Anti-CD26 aAbs through their quantification in plasmas from 106 treatment-naïve early and undifferentiated AR. Clinical antibodies, Anti-CD26 aAbs, and other disease-related biomarkers were measured in plasmas obtained in the first visit from patients, which were later classified as RA and non-RA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Two different isotype signatures were found among ten groups of patients, one for Anti-CD26 IgA and other for Anti-CD26 IgG and IgM isotypes, both converging in patients with arthritis (RA and Unresolved Undifferentiated Arthritis: UUA), who present elevated levels of all three isotypes. The four UUA patients, unresolved after two years, were ACPA and rheumatic factor (RF) negatives. In the whole cohort, 51.3% of ACPA/RF seronegatives were Anti-CD26 positives, and a similar frequency was observed in the seropositive RA patients. Only weak associations of the three isotypes with ESR, CRP and disease activity parameters were observed. Anti-CD26 aAbs are present in treatment-naïve early arthritis patients, including ACPA and RF seronegative individuals, suggestive of a potential pathogenic and/or biomarker role of Anti-CD26 aAbs in the development of rheumatic diseases.

Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is currently diagnosed and treated once an individual displays the clinical findings of inflammatory arthritis (IA). However, growing evidence supports that there is a 'pre-RA' stage that can be identified through factors such as autoantibodies in absence of clinically apparent IA. In particular, biomarkers, including antibodies to citrullinated protein antigens (ACPA), demonstrate a high risk for future IA/RA, and multiple clinical trials have been developed to intervene in individuals in pre-RA to prevent or delay clinically apparent disease. Herein, we will discuss in more depth what is currently known about the natural history of RA, and the emerging possibility that early 'diagnosis' of RA-related autoimmunity followed by an intervention can lead to the delay or prevention of the first onset of clinically apparent RA.

Yunpi Qufeng Chushi Formula for Pre-Rheumatoid Arthritis: Study Protocol for a Multiple-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by progressive bone erosion on diarthrodial joints. RA patients usually experienced three stages before final diagnosis: the health period, the pre-clinical period (immune response exists without clinical symptoms), and the pre-RA period (immune response exists with mild inflammatory manifestation). Presently, there is seldom guidance referring to early intervention which is a benefit for stable disease conditions and low morbidity. Prophylactic treatment is a major feature of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). In this present study, a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is carried out to evaluate both efficacy and safety in preventing RA progression on Yunpi Qufeng Chushi formula (YQCF). Method: The multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted in 13 hospitals nationwide. A total of 390 patients ages between 18 and 70 will be recruited in the trial. They will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (YQCF) and placebo group. The follow-up visit will be taken every 3 months from baseline to 1 year. Diagnosis, disease activity scores, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), TCM syndrome scores, and safety assessments will be recorded at every visit. Joint color doppler ultrasound, health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), and functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-F) will be recorded at baseline and the last visit. Discussion: This work will provide evidence of YQCF in preventing RA progression. However, whether early intervention would benefit the controlling RA disease still needs a long-term follow-up. Ethics and dissemination: Protocol version 2 (201910-1). This research was approved by the medical ethics committee of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (2019-045). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed academic journal. Trial registration numbers: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, ChiCTR1900024166.

The Clinical Presentation and Factors Associated with Disease Severity of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease that leads to joint destruction and disability if left untreated. Few studies on RA have been conducted in Uganda, and there is limited information on disease severity and associated factors. This study sought to characterize the clinical presentation and to determine disease severity and the factors associated with disease severity among participants with RA in Uganda.

Methods

Between August 2018 and February 2019, patients presenting to the rheumatology outpatient clinic in Mulago National Referral Hospital were enrolled into the study using a cross-sectional design. Participants' demographics and clinical characteristics were collected using a study questionnaire, and laboratory results were extracted from their charts. The patients' functionality was assessed using the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire and their disease severity was assessed using the RA Disease Activity Score based on 28-joint count (DAS28).

Results

A total of 170 participants were enrolled, of whom 81.2% were female. Nearly two-thirds (111/170) were classified as having severe disease. Having a functional status score of >0.5 (adjusted odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.2, p<0.001) was significantly associated with severe disease.

Conclusion

In this population, the majority of the patients seen at the rheumatology outpatient clinic had severe disease, suggesting that patients may be presenting late, with limited early detection of the disease. Impaired functional status was associated with increased disease severity and may be used by clinicians to highlight disease severity when it is not possible to assess the RA DAS28.

Undifferentiated arthritis; a changing population who did not benefit from enhanced DMARD-strategies-results from a 25-years longitudinal inception cohort

OBJECTIVES

International guidelines stress timely DMARD-initiation in early-arthritis, also when classification-criteria are not yet fulfilled. Consequently, undifferentiated arthritis (UA)-patients may be increasingly treated with DMARDs. Since UA is a diagnosis per exclusionem, the introduction of the 2010-classification-criteria presumably decreased the UA-population as former UA-patients became regarded as RA. The contemporary definition of UA has therefore become: not fulfilling the 1987- nor 2010-criteria. Importantly, placebo-controlled trials on DMARD-efficacy in contemporary UA are absent. We aimed to study whether enhanced treatment-strategies across 25-years improved outcomes in contemporary UA, whereby inclusion-period was an instrumental variable for DMARD-treatment.

METHODS

UA was defined, retrospectively, as clinical arthritis (joint-swelling at physical-examination) neither fulfilling the 1987 nor 2010-RA-criteria, nor any other clinical diagnosis. In total, 1132 UA-patients, consecutively included in the Leiden-EAC between 1993-2019, were studied, divided into 5 inclusion-periods; 1993-1997, 1998-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2019. Frequency of DMARD-initiation was compared across the inclusion-periods, as were the following outcomes: DAS28CRP and disability (HAQ-DI) during follow-up, prevalence of DMARD-free-status within 10-years (DFS; spontaneous remission or sustained remission after DMARD-stop) and progression to RA (according 1987/2010-criteria).

RESULTS

The contemporary UA-population is mainly autoantibody-negative, with median SJC = 2, TJC = 3 and HAQ = 0.6. These characteristics were similar across the inclusion-periods. DMARD-treatment increased from 17% (1993-1997) up-to 52% (2015-2019), methotrexate became more common. DAS28CRP during follow-up improved from 2011 onwards (-0.18,-0.25DAS-units/p< 0.05). Disability-scores during follow-up did not significantly improve. DFS-prevalence also remained similar: 58%, 57%, 61% (1993-1997/1998-2005/2006-2010; p= 0.77). Likewise, the percentages RA-development did not decrease (14%/21%/26%/18%/27%).

CONCLUSION

Although intensified DMARD-treatment slightly improved disease-activity-scores, physical-functioning and long-term outcomes did not improve. This suggests overtreatment in the contemporary UA-population and underlines the importance to develop stratification-methods suitable for this population.

Association of Serum and Crevicular Fluid Dickkopf-1 Levels with Disease Activity and Periodontitis in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess DKK-1 levels, in Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) and serum, as a biomarker for bone loss and disease activity in periodontitis and early RA (eRA).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we obtained serum and GCF from 10 interproximal sites (Distal Buccal I/S, Mesio Buccal I/S, Distal Palatal/Lingual, Mesio Palatal/Lingual) according to the highest degree of inflammation by a patient for 240 sites from eRA patients. Patients received a periodontal assessment, a radiographic evaluation, tomography of interproximal sites, and DKK1 levels were determined by ELISA. Comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test and analysis by Chi2 test, and a logistic regression model was applied.

RESULTS

The mean age was 46.33 ± 12.0 years, the Disease Activity Score (DAS-28-ESR) was 4.08 ± 1.4. Periodontitis was present in 65.2% of the patients, and 59.6% of these patients had bone loss in interproximal sites. Higher GCF-DKK1 levels were associated with serum-DKK1 (OR:2.41 IC95% 1.14-5.09, p=0.021) and were related with DAS28-ESR (p=0.001), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID 3) (p=0.001), and tender joints (p=0.040). Foot bone erosion and juxta-articular osteopenia were associated with high levels of serum-DKK1 (p=0.009 and 0.001, respectively). Serum-DKK1 were associated with SDAI (OR: 2.38 IC95% 1.03-5.52, p=0.043), RAPID 3 (p=0.001), and rheumatoid factor (p=0.018). The GCF-DKK1 levels were associated with periodontal bone loss (p=0.011), periodontitis (p=0.070) and its severity (OR: 2.58 IC95% 2.28-7.28, p=0.001). Bone loss was more frequent in buccal sites (73.5%) and was associated with increased levels of DKK1 (p=0.033).

CONCLUSION

In the early stages of the eRA disease, serum and GCF-DKK1 could be a biomarker for clinical disease activity and periodontal and articular bone erosion.

EULAR points to consider for conducting clinical trials and observational studies in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Despite growing interest, there is no guidance or consensus on how to conduct clinical trials and observational studies in populations at risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

An European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) task force formulated four research questions to be addressed by systematic literature review (SLR). The SLR results informed consensus statements. One overarching principle, 10 points to consider (PTC) and a research agenda were proposed. Task force members rated their level of agreement (1-10) for each PTC.

RESULTS

Epidemiological and demographic characteristics should be measured in all clinical trials and studies in at-risk individuals. Different at-risk populations, identified according to clinical presentation, were defined: asymptomatic, musculoskeletal symptoms without arthritis and early clinical arthritis. Study end-points should include the development of subclinical inflammation on imaging, clinical arthritis, RA and subsequent achievement of arthritis remission. Risk factors should be assessed at baseline and re-evaluated where appropriate; they include genetic markers and autoantibody profiling and additionally clinical symptoms and subclinical inflammation on imaging in those with symptoms and/or clinical arthritis. Trials should address the effect of the intervention on risk factors, as well as progression to clinical arthritis or RA. In patients with early clinical arthritis, pharmacological intervention has the potential to prevent RA development. Participants' knowledge of their RA risk may inform their decision to participate; information should be provided using an individually tailored approach.

CONCLUSION

These consensus statements provide data-driven guidance for rheumatologists, health professionals and investigators conducting clinical trials and observational studies in individuals at risk of RA.

Prescribing Trends of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs Using a Claims Database from 6 Million People in Japan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are used either when conventional synthetic DMARDs are ineffective or when disease activity is high and with poor prognostic factors, based on various clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prescribing trends of bDMARDs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan, and to clarify whether the pharmacological therapy of bDMARDs is administered based on guidelines.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive epidemiological study from 2012 to 2018 using the JMDC Claims Database, a nationwide claims database, and described the annual changes based on the number of patients prescribed bDMARDs. Anti-rheumatic drugs were identified based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, including methotrexate, glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bDMARDs.

RESULTS

From the database including 6,862,244 people, the data of 6407 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were extracted. The present study demonstrated that the proportion of patients prescribed bDMARDs was 1.0 per 1000 people, with those aged ≥ 65 years being the most common age group. The proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were prescribed bDMARDs increased significantly over time (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the concomitant proportions of methotrexate (p < 0.0001), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p < 0.0001) and glucocorticoids (p = 0.0001) prescribed with bDMARDs decreased significantly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in bDMARD monotherapy may be attributed to the new bDMARDs that have been launched sequentially; furthermore, physicians have come to recognise monotherapy as the mainstay of treatment. Future studies must accumulate evidence on the long-term efficacy and safety of bDMARDs.

The susceptibility of attaining and maintaining DMARD-free remission in different (rheumatoid) arthritis phenotypes

OBJECTIVES

To compare (sustained) DMARD-free remission rates((S)DFR), defined as respectively ≥6 months and >1 year, after 2 and 5 years between three clinical arthritis phenotypes; undifferentiated arthritis(UA), autoantibody-negative(RA-) and positive rheumatoid arthritis(RA+).

METHODS

All UA(n = 130), RA-(n = 176) and RA + (n = 331) patients from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach, were used. (S)DFR comparisons between phenotypes after 2 and 5 years were performed with Logistic regression. Medication use and early and late flares(DAS ≥ 2.4), respectively defined as < 12 and >12 months after reaching DFR, were also compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate potential predictors for (S)DFR.

RESULTS

Within 2 and 5 years less DFR was seen in RA + (17.2-25.7%), followed by RA-(28.4-42.1%) and UA patients(43.1-58.5%). This also applied for SDFR within 2 and 5 years (respectively 7.6% and 21.4%; 20.5% and 38.1%; and 35.4% and 55.4%). A flare during tapering was seen in 22.7% of patients. Of the patients in DFR 7.5% had an early flare and 3.4% a late flare. Also more treatment intensifications occurred in RA+ compared with RA- and UA. We found that higher baseline DAS, ACPA positivity, BMI and smoking were negatively associated with (S)DFR, while clinical phenotype(reference RA+), short symptom duration(<6 months) and remission within 6 months were positively associated.

CONCLUSIONS

(Long-term) clinical outcomes differ between undifferentiated arthritis, autoantibody-negative and positive rheumatoid arthritis(RA). These data reconfirm that RA can be subdivided into aforementioned clinical phenotypes and that treatment might be stratified upon these phenotypes, although validation is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, https://www.isrctn.com/, ISRCTN26791028.

The impact of different (rheumatoid) arthritis phenotypes on patients' lives

Objectives

To compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains between three arthritis phenotypes [undifferentiated arthritis (UA), autoantibody-negative RA (RA⁻) and autoantibody-positive RA (RA⁺)] at diagnosis, after 2 years and over time.

Methods

All UA (n = 130), RA⁻ (n = 176) and RA⁺ (n = 331) patients from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach, were used. PRO comparisons between phenotypes at baseline and after 2 years were performed with analysis of variance, while a linear mixed model compared them over time. Effect sizes were weighted against the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for each PRO.

Results

RA⁻ patients had a higher disease burden compared with RA⁺ and UA. At baseline and after 2 years, RA⁻ patients had more functional impairment and a poorer Physical Component Summary (PCS) compared with the other phenotypes, while they only scored worse for general health and morning stiffness duration at baseline. The MCIDs were exceeded at baseline, except for functional ability between RA⁺ and UA, while after 2 years only the MCID of the PCS was exceeded by RA⁻ compared with UA and RA. After 2 years the PROs of all phenotypes improved, but PROs measuring functioning were still worse compared with the general population, even when patients had low disease activity.

Conclusion

RA⁻ patients had the highest disease burden of all phenotypes. Although most patients have low disease activity after treatment, all clinical phenotypes still have a similar significant impact on patients’ lives, which is mainly physical. Therefore it is important to assess and address PROs in daily practice because of persistent disease burden despite low disease activity.

Trial registration

ISRCTN26791028.

The number of risk factors for persistent disease determines the clinical course of early arthritis

Objectives

Management of early arthritis is based upon early recognition of individuals at high risk of developing persistent arthritis. Therefore, this study investigates whether the number of risk factors for persistent disease or treatment determines the clinical course of early arthritis by comparing the chance at (sustained) DMARD-free remission ((S)DFR) after 2 years follow-up.

Methods

Data from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded multicentre strategy trial with a treat-to-target approach were used. We selected all patients with ≥1 swollen joint who did not fulfil 1987 and/or 2010 criteria for RA. The number of risk factors present; autoantibody-positivity, polyarthritis (>4), erosive disease and elevated acute phase reactants, determined risk group stratification. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with (S)DFR as dependent variables and baseline disease activity score (DAS), treatment, symptom duration and number of risk factors present as independent variables.

Results

In total, 130 early arthritis patients were included and respectively 31, 66 and 33 had 0, 1 and ≥2 risk factors present. DFR rates were respectively 74%, 48% and 45% for early arthritis patients with 0, 1 and ≥2 risk factors present. In accordance SDFR rates were 61%, 32% and 30%. In our logistic model (S)DFR was not influenced by the initial treatment strategies when stratified for risk groups.

Conclusion

The chance at (S)DFR in early arthritis diminishes when more risk factors are present, which is irrespective of the given initial treatment. Our data point out to a stratified management approach in early arthritis based on their risk profile, but validation is needed.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN26791028 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN26791028).

Prospective Comparison of Angiogenesis-Specific 68Ga-RGD2 PET/CT Imaging Parameters and DAS28-ESR in Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of angiogenesis-specific 68Ga-RGD2 PET/CT with Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) in assessing disease activity and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This was a prospective study comparing the performance of 68Ga-RGD2 PET/CT and DAS28-ESR in 30 RA patients. All of them underwent 68Ga-RGD2 PET/CT scan from head to toe and clinical examination at the baseline. A repeat scan and clinical examination were done in 27 patients after 3 months of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs ± steroids. Three PET parameters, that is, PJC (PET-positive joint count), aSUVmax (average SUVmax), and hSUVmax (highest SUVmax), of positive joints were compared with the DAS28-ESR for disease activity assessment and response evaluation.

RESULTS

Among the 3 PET parameters, PJC showed a significant correlation with the DAS28-ESR (0.64, P < 0.01). A significant change was observed with treatment in the DAS28-ESR and PET parameters of 27 patients at follow-up. There was significant correlation between percentage changes in DAS28-ESR and scan parameters such as PJC (0.689, P < 0.001), aSUVmax (0.712, P < 0.001), and hSUVmax (0.555, P = 0.003) values. The absolute change in aSUVmax value could accurately discriminate (area under the curve, 0.98; P = 0.001) European League Against Rheumatism responders from nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-RGD2 PET/CT is a promising tool for objective assessment of disease activity and treatment response in patients with RA.

The DNA methylation Profile of Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients Anticipates their Subsequent Differentiation to Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Undifferentiated arthritis (UA) is the term used to cover all the cases of arthritis that do not fit a specific diagnosis. A significant percentage of UA patients progress to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), others to a different definite rheumatic disease, and the rest undergo spontaneous remission. Therapeutic intervention in patients with UA can delay or halt disease progression and its long-term consequences. It is therefore of inherent interest to identify those UA patients with a high probability of progressing to RA who would benefit from early appropriate therapy. We hypothesized that alterations in the DNA methylation profiles of immune cells may inform on the genetically- or environmentally-determined status of patients and potentially discriminate between disease subtypes.

METHODS

In this study, we performed DNA methylation profiling of a UA patient cohort, in which progression into RA occurs for a significant proportion of the patients.

RESULTS

We find differential DNA methylation in UA patients compared to healthy controls. Most importantly, our analysis identifies a DNA methylation signature characteristic of those UA cases that differentiate to RA. We demonstrate that the methylome of peripheral mononuclear cells can be used to anticipate the evolution of UA to RA, and that this methylome is associated with a number of inflammatory pathways and transcription factors. Finally, we design a machine-learning strategy for DNA methylation-based classification that predicts the differentiation of UA patients towards RA.

CONCLUSION

DNA methylation profiling provides a good predictor of UA-to-RA progression to anticipate targeted treatments and improve clinical management.

A pilot study of a machine-learning tool to assist in the diagnosis of hand arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Arthritis is a common condition, which frequently involves the hands. Patients with inflammatory arthritis have been shown to experience significant delays in diagnosis. We sought to develop and test a screening tool combining an image of a patient's hands, a short series of questions, and a single examination technique, to determine the most likely diagnosis in a patient presenting with hand arthritis. Machine learning techniques were used to develop separate algorithms for each component, which were combined to produce a diagnosis.

METHODS

280 consecutive new patients presenting to a Rheumatology practice with hand arthritis were enrolled. Each patient completed a 9-part questionnaire, had photographs taken of each hand, and had a single examination result recorded. The Rheumatologist diagnosis was recorded following a 45-minute consultation. The photograph algorithm was developed from 1000 previous hand images, and machine learning techniques were applied to the questionnaire results, training several models against the diagnosis from the Rheumatologist.

RESULTS

The combined algorithms in this study were able to predict inflammatory arthritis with an accuracy, precision, recall and specificity of 96·8%, 97·2%, 98·6% and 90·5% respectively. Similar results were found when inflammatory arthritis was subclassified into rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. The corresponding figures for osteoarthritis were 79·6%, 85·9%, 61·9% and 92·6%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a novel application combining image-processing and a patient questionnaire with applied machine-learning methods, to facilitate the diagnosis of patients presenting with hand arthritis. Preliminary results are encouraging for the application of such techniques in clinical practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Acute respiratory viral adverse events during use of antirheumatic disease therapies: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is an acute respiratory viral infection that threatens people worldwide, including people with rheumatic disease, although it remains unclear to what extent various antirheumatic disease therapies increase susceptibility to complications of viral respiratory infections.

OBJECTIVE

The present study undertakes a scoping review of available evidence regarding the frequency and severity of acute respiratory viral adverse events related to antirheumatic disease therapies.

METHODS

Online databases were used to identify, since database inception, studies reporting primary data on acute respiratory viral infections in patients utilizing antirheumatic disease therapies. Independent reviewer pairs charted data from eligible studies using a standardized data abstraction tool.

RESULTS

A total of 180 studies were eligible for qualitative analysis. While acknowledging that the extant literature has a lack of specificity in reporting of acute viral infections or complications thereof, the data suggest that use of glucocorticoids, JAK inhibitors (especially high-dose), TNF inhibitors, and anti-IL-17 agents may be associated with an increased frequency of respiratory viral events. Available data suggest no increased frequency or risk of respiratory viral events with NSAIDs, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, or apremilast. One large cohort study demonstrated an association with leflunomide use and increased risk of acute viral respiratory events compared to non-use.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review identified that some medication classes may confer increased risk of acute respiratory viral infections. However, definitive data are lacking and future studies should address this knowledge gap.

Novel biomarkers of a peripheral blood interferon signature associated with drug-naïve early arthritis patients distinguish persistent from self-limiting disease course

We profiled gene expression signatures to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), self-limiting arthritis (SLA), and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) as compared to healthy controls as novel potential biomarkers for therapeutic responsiveness. Global gene expression profiles of PBMCs from 43 drug-naïve patients presenting with joint symptoms were evaluated and differentially expressed genes identified by comparative analysis with 24 healthy volunteers. Patients were assessed at presentation with follow up at 6 and 12 months. Gene ontology and network pathway analysis were performed using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources v6.7. Gene expression profiles were also determined after disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in the inflammatory arthritis groups (i.e. RA and UA) and confirmed by qRT-PCR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) estimation were performed to assess the diagnostic value of candidate gene expression signatures. A type I interferon (IFN) gene signature distinguished DMARD-naïve patients who will subsequently develop persistent inflammatory arthritis (i.e. RA and UA) from those with NIA. In patients with RA, the IFN signature is characterised by up-regulation of SIGLEC1 (p = 0.00597) and MS4A4A (p = 0.00000904). We also identified, EPHB2 (p = 0.000542) and PDZK1IP1 (p = 0.0206) with RA-specific gene expression profiles and elevated expression of the ST6GALNAC1 (p = 0.0023) gene in UA. ROC and AUC risk score analysis suggested that MSA4A (AUC: 0.894, 0.644, 0.720), PDZK1IP1 (AUC: 0.785, 0.806, 0.977), and EPHB2 (AUC: 0.794, 0.723, 0.620) at 0, 6, and 12 months follow-up can accurately discriminate patients with RA from healthy controls and may have practical value for RA diagnosis. In patients with early inflammatory arthritis, ST6GALNAC1 is a potential biomarker for UA as compared with healthy controls whereas EPHB2, MS4A4A, and particularly PDZK1IP1 may discriminate RA patients. SIGLEC1 may also be a useful marker of disease activity in UA.

Temporomandibular joint function, periodontal health, and oral microbiome in early rheumatoid arthritis and at-risk individuals: a prospective cohort study protocol

Objectives/aims

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease affecting the joints, including the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Early diagnosis and treatment can alleviate symptoms and prevent progression. Predictors for disease outcome in individuals at risk for RA are therefore valuable. While limited information is available on the prevalence of TMJ involvement in early RA, previous studies suggest that RA, periodontitis and the oral microbiome are interrelated. Predictive factors for RA development may thus be present in the oral cavity. Our two aims are: (1) to assess the prevalence of TMJ involvement in early RA, and (2) to investigate the predictive value of oral factors in RA development.

Materials and methods

We will include 150 individuals in this multi-center, prospective cohort study: 50 patients with early RA, 50 at-risk individuals, and 50 healthy controls. At baseline, the TMJ, periodontal health, and the oral microbiome will be examined. The general health will be followed over time, on four occasions up to 3 years.

Discussion

Our results will provide insight into the prevalence and clinical characterization of TMJ involvement in early RA. For at-risk individuals, oral factors can be studied as possible predictors for the development of RA.

Preferences for treatments to prevent rheumatoid arthritis in Canada and the influence of shared decision-making

OBJECTIVE

To elicit and compare preferences of patients and first-degree relatives and rheumatologists for preventive treatments for rheumatoid arthritis, understand the influence of shared decision-making, and predict the probability of uptake of the preventive treatments currently being studied.

METHODS

An online discrete choice experiment was completed by patients and their first-degree relatives and rheumatologists. Results were analysed using mixed logit model to estimate preferences for the key features of treatments. Preferences for features of treatments were used to predict the probability of uptake of seven preventive treatment options.

RESULTS

A total of 108 potential recipients (78 patients and 30 of their first-degree relatives) and 39 rheumatologists completed the survey. Preferences of patients/first-degree relatives and rheumatologists were similar (shared decision-making was most important, followed by the risk of side effects and potential benefit), but subtle differences existed; rheumatologists placed greater importance on certainty in evidence than patients/first-degree relatives, who felt that how a treatment was taken was more important. Predicted uptake suggested that 38% (95% CI 19%, 58%) of patients/first-degree relatives would not take a preventive treatment, compared with 12% (95% CI - 4%, 27%) of rheumatologists. A consistent finding across all groups was a preference for non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

CONCLUSION

Only relatively safe options for preventive treatment are likely to be acceptable to at-risk populations. This study of preventive treatments highlights that the preferences of physicians and recipients of treatment should take a central role in the design of clinical studies as well as in decisions to initiate treatments. Key Points • This paper is the first to compare preferences for preventive treatments between rheumatologists and patients and at-risk individuals. • The results of this study indicate that patients and at-risk individuals, as well as rheumatologists, are likely to prefer the safest options as preventive treatment, even if the potential benefit of these is lower. • Although preferences of patients and at-risk individuals are similar to those of rheumatologists, the choice of preventive treatment may differ between groups; this is important as shared decision-making was a critical factor in treatment decision-making. • Preferences of physicians and recipients of treatment should take a central role in the design of clinical studies as well as in decisions to initiate treatments.

The road to rheumatoid arthritis prevention: challenges and opportunities

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most prevalent cause of chronic arthritis worldwide and contributes substantial health burden and socioeconomic costs, issues that are magnified by the aging population. Despite significantly improved outcomes in the management of RA with earlier diagnosis and advances in treatment, there is still no cure and disease prevention remains an area of intense interest. Studies examining different treatment regimens in varied subsets of patients with pre-clinical RA have been able to delay but not prevent onset of frank RA. In this timely issue of Clinical Rheumatology, Alpziar-Rodriguez D. and Finckh A. highlight the available literature on pre-clinical RA including modifiable risk factors, results of key intervention trials, and discuss whether prevention of RA is on the horizon. We offer additional thoughts on current areas of uncertainty in RA prevention studies, lessons to be learned from prevention trials in other disease states, and future directions to consider.

Precision medicine in the care of rheumatoid arthritis: Focus on prediction and prevention of future clinically-apparent disease

There is an emerging understanding that an individual's risk for future rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be determined using a combination of factors while they are still in a state where clinically-apparent inflammatory arthritis (IA) is not yet present. Indeed, this concept has underpinned several completed and ongoing prevention trials in RA. Importantly, risk factors can be divided into modifiable (e.g. smoking, exercise, dental care and diet) and non-modifiable factors (e.g. genetics, sex, age). In addition, there are now several biomarkers including autoantibodies, inflammatory markers and imaging techniques that are highly predictive of future clinically-apparent IA/RA. Although none of the prevention studies have yet provided major breakthroughs, several of them have provided valuable insights that can help to improve the design of future clinical trials and enable RA prevention. In aggregate, these findings suggest that the most accurate disease prediction models will require the combination of demographic and clinical information, biomarkers and potentially medical imaging data to identify individuals for intervention. This review summarizes some of the key aspects around precision medicine in RA with special focus on disease prediction and prevention.

Is the prevention of rheumatoid arthritis possible?

Preclinical phases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been described, genetic and environmental risk factors for RA development have been identified, and several biomarkers of RA have been detected long before the clinical onset of the disease; all of which have opened the possibility for preventive interventions. Several studies are currently exploring pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent the development of RA. We will review the evidence for prevention of RA and discuss key challenges for preventive interventions, including identification of the adequate target population, the risks of applying potentially harmful and expensive therapies to asymptomatic at-risk individuals, and the importance of taking into account the preferences of individuals at risk regarding preventive treatment options.

Measuring ACPA in the general population or primary care: is it useful?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a significant disease burden and high costs for society. Because the disease has identifiable preclinical stages, screening and prevention have become a possibility in RA. Anticitrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs) are arguably the most likely candidate biomarker to screen for RA. This paper reviews the evidence for the use of ACPAs as a screening test in the broader general population, to identify individuals at high risk of subsequent onset of RA. We will review the diagnostic properties of the test and its positive and negative predictive value in different settings. We will discuss how ACPA testing could effectively be integrated in a broader screening strategy for RA.

Established rheumatoid arthritis - Redefining the concept

During the last few years, there has been a shift of focus in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) research towards earlier disease states. The terms early and established RA are inseparable, and having a clear definition of these two terms is crucial in conducting research and trying to understand the immunopathological mechanisms behind these different disease states. Established RA has been connected to chronic inflammation and a high burden of long-standing disease, with joint damage and comorbidities as a consequence of chronic inflammation. A chronological definition does not ensure us clear differentiation between early and established disease, because diagnosis can be delayed significantly. Similarly, a radiological definition does not ensure a clear differentiation either, as there is significant heterogeneity in the RA patient population, with some patients never developing structural damage, even after many years of disease. As the focus is now more on the early stages of disease, we propose to use the term established RA from the time of a definite clinical diagnosis of RA, irrespective of the symptoms' duration or the presence of irreversible damage, to distinguish established disease to a stage of undifferentiated arthritis (UA) or risk for developing RA, which might never progress to RA.

The earlier, the better or the worse? Towards accurate management of patients with arthralgia at risk for RA

The favourable long-term results of early treatment in patients with classified rheumatoid arthritis have resulted in an increasing interest in the diseases phases preceding clinical arthritis. The hypothesis to test is that an intervention in these early phases may better prevent or reduce disease persistence than an intervention when arthritis has become clinically manifest. While several placebo-controlled trials are still ongoing, to date there is no firm evidence that this hypothesis truly holds. Therefore, it is important to reflect on the current status of arthralgia preceding clinical arthritis. Inherent to every new field of research, attitudes are conflicting, with opinions propagating innovation (based on the fear of undertreatment) on the one hand, and critical sounds pleading for more restraint (fear of overtreatment) on the other hand. In this Viewpoint, we will examine these divergent opinions, relate them to a preferred ultimate scenario and provide considerations for future studies and daily practice.

Autoantibody status is not associated with early treatment response to first-line methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

In RA, the relationship between autoantibody status and treatment response to MTX remains unclear. We investigated the association between autoantibody status and early remission in newly diagnosed RA patients treated with MTX using real-world data.

Methods

RA-patients initially treated with MTX were selected from an international observational database (METEOR). Patients were stratified into autoantibody-positive (RF- and/or ACPA-positive) or autoantibody negative (RF- and ACPA-negative). The effect of autoantibody status on the chance of achieving remission within 3 to 6 months was analysed using Cox-proportional hazards regression.

Results

Data from 1826 RA patients were available for analysis. DAS remission was achieved in 17% (318/1826). This was similar in autoantibody-positive [17% (282/1629)] and -negative patients [18% (36/197)]. Hence, autoantibody positivity was not associated with remission [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.57, 1.38]. Similar findings were found when stratified for MTX monotherapy (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.41, 1.37) or combination treatment (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37, 1.54). Good physical function (HAQ < 0.5) was achieved in 33% (530/1590) of all patients. Autoantibody-positivity was also not associated with HAQ < 0.5 (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71, 1.57).

Conclusion

Autoantibody status is not associated with early remission in newly diagnosed RA-patients receiving MTX. This indicates that MTX is effective as an initial treatment strategy regardless of autoantibody status.