Randomized controlled trial of adalimumab in patients with nonpsoriatic peripheral spondyloarthritis

Determinants of health-related quality of life and global functioning and health in axSpA, pSpA and PsA: results from the ASAS-PerSpA study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and global functioning and health (GH) in axial SpA (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) and (PsA).

METHODS

The ASAS-perSpA study data were analysed. Models for the three patient groups were run separately to explore factors associated with HRQoL and GH, assessed by EQ-5D and ASAS-HI, respectively.

RESULTS

The analyses included 4185 patients: 2719 with axSpA, 433 with pSpA, and 1033 with PsA.In axSpA, disease activity (β = -0.061), physical function (β = -0.041), female sex (β = -0.019) and fibromyalgia (FM) (β = -0.068) were associated with worse HRQoL; age (β = 0.001) and university education (β = 0.014) were associated with better HRQoL. In pSpA, disease activity (β = -0.04) and physical function (β = -0.054) were associated with worse HRQoL. In PsA, disease activity (β = -0.045), physical function (β = -0.053), axial disease (β = -0.041) and female sex (β = -0.028) were associated with worse HRQoL. In axSpA, disease activity (β = 0.889), physical function (β = 0.887), peripheral disease (β = 0.564), female sex (β = 0.812) and FM (β = 1.639) were associated with worse GH; age (β = -0.013) and university education (β = -0.274) were associated with better GH. In pSpA, physical function (β = 1.142) and female sex (β = 1.060) were associated with worse GH; university education (β = -0.611) was associated with better GH. In PsA, disease activity (β = 0.703), physical function (β = 1.025), axial involvement (β = 0.659), female sex (β = 0.924) and FM (β = 1.387) were associated with worse GH; age (β = -0.024) and university education (β = -0.856) were associated with better GH.

CONCLUSION

Disease activity and physical function are major HRQoL and GH determinants across SpA types, and clinical characteristics and sociodemographic factors play an important role, highlighting the importance of a holistic approach for individual patients.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis: What have we learned?

The peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) entity remains poorly defined in comparison with axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis, as the clinical symptoms have low specificity, the biological markers are virtually lacking, and dedicated randomized controlled trials in this specific indication remain scarce. In addition, clinical similarities between pSpA and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been described, partly explained by a resemblance in the pathophysiology of both entities. Thus, diagnosing pSpA can be challenging because of the overlap with other entities and the absence of a specific test or imaging study that can definitively diagnose the condition. The aim of this review is to summarize the current understanding of pSpA, its epidemiology, physiopathology, clinical diagnosis, and classification criteria. In addition, we present patient-reported outcomes used in pSpA clinical studies, available evidence on therapies, and future directions.

The impact of psoriasis on the clinical characteristics, disease burden and treatment patterns of peripheral spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical characteristics, disease burden, and treatment patterns of peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) patients with and without psoriasis using data from the ASAS-perSpA study.

METHODS

We included 433 patients who had a diagnosis of pSpA according to the rheumatologist's diagnosis from the ASAS-PerSpA study. The presence of a personal history of psoriasis was defined as the presence of signs of psoriasis at physical examination or the presence of psoriatic nail dystrophy, including onycholysis, pitting and hyperkeratosis, or a history of psoriasis diagnosed by a physician. Clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes and treatment pattern were compared between subgroups with and without psoriasis.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients (19.2%) had a personal history of psoriasis. Patients with psoriasis were older (48.4 vs 43.2 years) and had a longer diagnostic delay (7.4 vs 3.5 years), a higher frequency of dactylitis (36.1 vs 20.0%) and enthesitis (65.1 vs 55.4%) than patients without psoriasis. A longer diagnostic delay (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11]), lower odds for HLA-B27 positivity (OR = 0.31 [95% CI 0.15, 0.65]) and higher odds for enthesitis (OR = 2.39 [95% CI 1.16, 4.93]) were associated with the presence of psoriasis in a multivariable regression analysis. While patient-reported outcomes were comparable between groups, a higher use of biologic DMARDs was observed in patients with vs without psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

The presence of psoriasis has an impact on clinical characteristics of pSpA. pSpA patients without psoriasis were less frequently treated with biologic DMARDs despite similar disease burden as compared with patients with psoriasis.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritissine psoriase: are we dealing with semantics or clinically meaningful differences?

Diagnosing peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) remains a significant challenge due to the lack of specific disease biomarkers and the overlap with other SpA subtypes, mainly psoriatic arthritis (PsA), which represents a diagnostic challenge particularly in the absence of skin psoriasis (PsAsine psoriase). This narrative review aimed to compare the epidemiology, genetic susceptibility, pathophysiology, classification criteria, disease phenotype and burden, and therapeutic guidelines between patients diagnosed with pSpA and those with PsAsine psoriase,to determine if the two entities should be considered jointly or distinctly. Globally, pSpA appears to be more inclusive compared with PsAsine psoriase. Areas of similarities include age of onset, number of joints involved and prevalence of axial involvement. However, patients with pSpA have a male gender predominance, a higher prevalence of HLA-B27, enthesitis and involvement of large joints of the lower limbs, whereas patients with PsAsine psoriasehave a higher prevalence HLA-Cw6, dactylitis and involvement of hand distal interphalangeal joints. Therefore, the difference between pSpA and PsAsine psoriasegoes beyond semantics. The few dissimilarities should drive scientific efforts to reach a better characterisation of pSpA as an individual disease. Accordingly, randomised clinical trials should target patients with well-defined pSpA to identify effective therapies in this population.

A glance into the future of diagnosis and treatment of spondyloarthritis

The last two decades have seen major developments in the field of spondyloarthritis (SpA), but there are still important unmet needs to address. In the future, we envisage important advances in the diagnosis and treatment of SpA. In the diagnosis of SpA, the use of online and social media tools will increase awareness of the disease and facilitate the referral of patients to rheumatology clinics. In addition, more specific diagnostic tests will be available, especially advanced imaging methods and new biomarkers. This will allow most patients to be diagnosed at an early stage of the disease. In the treatment of SpA, an increasing number of novel treatment targets can be expected, most of which will be directed against intracellular enzymes. We hope to see more strategy trials shaping treatment pathways in SpA and accommodating principals of precision medicine. Approved treatment options will be available for both axial and peripheral SpA. We also hope to intervene not only at the inflammation level but also at the level of underlying immunological processes that might be associated with a higher probability of long-standing remission if not a cure. Finally, artificial intelligence techniques will allow for the analysis of large-scale data to answer relevant research questions for the diagnosis and management of patients with SpA.

Spondyloarthritis in inflammatory bowel disease cohorts: systematic literature review and critical appraisal of study designs

To critically appraise study designs evaluating spondyloarthritis (SpA) phenotypes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A systematic literature review of PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Cinahl, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed. Articles published from January 2000 - March 2020 were included if they evaluated the prevalence/incidence of musculoskeletal disease in cohorts of IBD patients. Most of the 69 included studies were clinic based (54/69, 78%), single center (47/69, 68%) and cross-sectional (60/69, 87%). The median prevalence of axial and peripheral SpA in IBD was 5% (range 1 - 46%) and 16% (range 1 - 43%), respectively. In 38 studies that evaluated axial disease in prospectively enrolled patients, inflammatory back pain was analyzed in 53%. SpA classification criteria were used in 68% and imaging was performed in 76%. In 35 studies that evaluated peripheral disease in prospectively enrolled patients, SpA classification criteria were used in 46%. A physical exam was performed in 74%, and it was performed by a rheumatologist in 54% of studies with a physical exam. Sub-phenotypes of peripheral SpA (mono- or oligo-arthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis) were variably reported. Seventy-four percent of studies did not mention whether osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia had been assessed or excluded. The spectrum of SpA phenotypes in IBD patients remains incompletely characterized. Future studies should focus on standardizing the variables collected in IBD-SpA cohorts and defining musculoskeletal phenotypes in IBD-SpA in order to better characterize this disease entity and advance the field for clinical and research purposes.

2022 French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Update the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis.

METHODS

Following standardized procedures, a systematic literature review was done by four supervised rheumatology residents based on questions defined by a task force of 16 attending rheumatologists. The findings were reviewed during three working meetings that culminated in each recommendation receiving a grade and the level of agreement among experts being determined.

RESULTS

Five general principles and 15 recommendations were developed. They take into account pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures along with treatment methods based on the dominant phenotype present (axial, articular, enthesitis/dactylitis) and the extra-articular manifestations (psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, uveitis). NSAIDs are the first-line pharmacological treatment in the various presentations. Conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are not indicated in the axial and isolated entheseal forms. If the response to conventional treatment is not adequate, targeted therapies (biologics, synthetics) should be considered; the indications depend on the clinical phenotype and presence of extra-articular manifestations.

CONCLUSION

This update incorporates recent data (published since the prior update in 2018) and the predominant clinical phenotype concept. It aims to help physicians with the everyday management of patients affected by spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis.

How Should We Measure Peripheral Spondyloarthritis?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is recognized as an overarching spectrum of disease characterized by axial SpA (axSpA), peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, and dactylitis. Despite significant overlap, patients are often characterized as having predominantly peripheral or axial involvement.

TNFi-induced sustained clinical remission in peripheral spondyloarthritis patients cannot be maintained with a step-down strategy based on methotrexate

OBJECTIVES

Treatment with golimumab monotherapy in early peripheral SpA (pSpA) results in higher rates of clinical remission compared with treatment in more longstanding disease. When reaching remission, treat-to-target recommendations suggest tapering of treatment. We therefore explored whether addition of MTX would permit discontinuation of golimumab in patients with pSpA in sustained clinical remission.

METHODS

After a 2-year extension phase with golimumab treatment, patients with pSpA reaching clinical remission in the CRESPA trial were offered a tapering strategy leading to discontinuation of golimumab and replacement by MTX monotherapy. Patients were prospectively followed to assess the rate of sustained biologic-free clinical remission. In case of relapse of arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis under MTX monotherapy, golimumab was restarted.

RESULTS

Of the original 60 pSpA patients, 25 entered the step-down strategy. Currently, only 4 patients (16%) are still in sustained remission under MTX monotherapy. In 21 patients (84%), golimumab was reinstalled because of relapse of disease activity (n = 19) or development of adverse events related to MTX (n = 2). Restarting golimumab treatment promptly restored clinical remission in all patients within 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In patients with early pSpA achieving clinical remission after 2 years of golimumab treatment, step-down therapy to monotherapy with MTX led to high rates of clinical relapse. This underscores the overall weak efficacy of MTX in maintaining clinical remission in pSpA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01426815.

Performance of three composite measures for disease activity in peripheral spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate concurrent validity and discrimination of the Disease Activity Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) in clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from a Dutch registry for SpA (SpA-Net) were used. Predefined hypotheses on concurrent validity of the composite measures with 15 other outcome measures of disease activity, physical function and health-related quality of life were tested. Concurrent validity was considered acceptable if ≥75% of the hypotheses were confirmed. Discrimination was assessed by stratifying patients in DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS predefined disease activity states and studying mean differences in health outcomes by one-way ANOVA. Furthermore, the concordance in disease activity states was determined. All analyses were repeated in subgroups with and without psoriasis.

RESULTS

DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS scores were available for 191, 139 and 279 patients with pSpA, respectively. The concurrent validity and discrimination of all composite measures were acceptable as the strength of correlations were as hypothesized in ≥75% of the studied correlations. With increasing disease activity states, scores in nearly all outcome measures worsened significantly. The DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS classified 22%, 56% and 48% of the patients, respectively, in the two highest disease activity states. Stratified analyses for concomitant psoriasis revealed no relevant subgroup differences.

CONCLUSION

The performance of DAPSA, PASDAS and ASDAS in pSpA was acceptable, and independent of concomitant psoriasis. Due to discrepancy in classification, the validity of existing thresholds for disease activity states warrants further study in pSpA.

Prevalence and distribution of peripheral musculoskeletal manifestations in spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis: results of the worldwide, cross-sectional ASAS-PerSpA study

OBJECTIVES

To characterise peripheral musculoskeletal involvement in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), across the world.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study with 24 participating countries. Patients with a diagnosis of axial SpA (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) or PsA according to their rheumatologist were included. The investigators were asked which diagnosis out of a list of six (axSpA, PsA, pSpA, inflammatory bowel disease-associated SpA, reactive arthritis or juvenile SpA (Juv-SpA)) fitted the patient best. Peripheral manifestations (ie, peripheral joint disease, enthesitis, dactylitis and root joint disease), their localisation and treatments were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 4465 patients were included (61% men, mean age 44.5 years) from four geographic areas: Latin America (n=538), Europe plus North America (n=1677), Asia (n=975) and the Middle East plus North Africa (n=1275). Of those, 78% had ever suffered from at least one peripheral musculoskeletal manifestation; 57% had peripheral joint disease, 44% had enthesitis and 15% had dactylitis. Latin American had far more often peripheral joint disease (80%) than patients from other areas. Patients with PsA had predominantly upper limb and small joint involvement (52%).Hip and shoulder involvement was found in 34% of patients. The prevalence of enthesitis ranged between 41% in patients with axSpA and 65% in patients with Juv-SpA. Dactylitis was most frequent among patients with PsA (37%).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that all peripheral features can be found in all subtypes of SpA, and that differences are quantitative rather than qualitative. In a high proportion of patients, axial and peripheral manifestations coincided. These findings reconfirm SpA clinical subtypes are descendants of the same underlying disease, called SpA.

Peripheral Enthesitis in Spondyloarthritis: Lessons from Targeted Treatments

A significant proportion of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) have peripheral enthesitis. Data suggest that psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with enthesitis have a higher disease burden than those without enthesitis. Over the past decade, there has been a proliferation of treatment options for spondyloarthropathy. These medications target multiple signaling pathways, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-12/23, IL-23, thymus (T)-cell co-stimulation, intracellular Janus kinases, and phosphodiesterase enzymes. As a key domain in SpA, enthesitis outcomes are included in pivotal trials of these agents and are reported as secondary outcome measures. One significant limitation is that the clinical evaluation of enthesitis relies on eliciting tenderness on palpation and is insensitive when compared with imaging. Furthermore, direct comparisons between studies are not available due to the use of different outcome measures, lack of consistent and comprehensive reporting outcomes, and subgroup analyses with a lower number of patients with enthesitis. This systematic review describes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and available targeted therapies against enthesitis, as well as a detailed report of their efficacy. One major trend identified during this review is incomplete reporting of outcome measures, as many studies reported proportions of enthesitis prevalence. Factors that affected responsiveness in clinical trials included the entheseal instrument used, the number of subjects available for comparison, as well as the therapeutic agent. In general, anti-TNF and anti-IL-17 agents, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors, show moderate responsiveness for enthesitis. The data for IL-23 targeting is contradictory.

Effect of adalimumab interventions on general infection among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the safety of adalimumab in different dosages and durations of treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the infection risk in people who received adalimumab. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception to December 8, 2020. Summary estimates were obtained  using meta-analysis with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs, considered to be of high quality, were analyzed. We found that there was a risk of infection (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18). In the stratified analysis, we found an increase in infection among those that received normal dosage (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23), and in patients with psoriasis (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00-1.35) and rheumatoid arthritis (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41), but not in those that received high doses and other criteria. In the meta-regressions, intervention duration was not related to changes in incidence risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials that have a longer treatment duration and higher doses are needed to clarify whether patients that received adalimumab had an elevated risk of general infection.

Reviewing Disease Activity Indices in Spondyloarthritis From the Sex Perspective: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) exhibited differences between women and men.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources in English or Spanish from January 1, 1995, to July 31, 2020, to assess the differences according to sex in BASDAI and ASDAS. We performed a comparative analysis by sex using t test and mean difference by sex metaanalyses for BASDAI and ASDAS, as well as a random-effects model using the inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies included BASDAI (6785 women, 12,929 men) and 16 of them included ASDAS (2046 women, 4403 men). Disease activity detected using BASDAI was significantly higher in women than in men (mean 4.9 vs 4.2, P = 0.02), whereas ASDAS did not detect differences between sexes (mean 2.8 women vs 2.8 men). In the metaanalyses, BASDAI detected significant differences between women and men (mean difference = 0.55 [95% CI 0.46-0.65], P < 0.00001), but ASDAS did not identify significant mean difference between sexes (0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.12], P = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

The 2 most widely used indices of disease activity in spondyloarthritis (SpA) discriminate differently according to sex by their different evaluations of peripheral disease. The different components and weights in BASDAI and ASDAS influence their values. BASDAI may be affected by fatigue, and in predominantly peripheral manifestations such as enthesitis, ASDAS may not be sensitive enough to detect activity. This may represent a sex bias unfavorable to women, because peripheral SpA is more common in women than in men.

Performance and Predictors of Minimal Disease Activity Response in Peripheral Spondyloarthritis Patients Treated With Adalimumab

OBJECTIVES

To examine concurrent validity and discrimination of modified minimal disease activity (mMDA) criteria in peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) following OMERACT filter principles and determine predictors of mMDA response.

METHODS

Four mMDA versions were derived in the ABILITY-2 study using the SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) or Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) but excluding psoriasis. To assess concurrent validity, mMDA versions were correlated with Peripheral SpondyloArthritis Response Criteria (PSpARC) remission, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score for inactive disease (ASDAS ID), and physician global. Treatment discrimination was assessed between adalimumab and placebo at week 12. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine baseline predictors of long-term mMDA responses and sustained mMDA.

RESULTS

The four mMDA versions showed a stronger positive correlation with PSpARC remission (r_tet >0.95) versus ASDAS ID (r_tet >0.75) at week 12 and years 1-3 and were able to show discrimination (p<0.001). Responsiveness was shown at week 12; significantly more patients receiving adalimumab versus placebo achieved all four versions of mMDA. Approximately 40-60% of adalimumab-treated patients achieved mMDA-LEI or SPARCC at years 1-3. Achieving mMDA response after 12 weeks of adalimumab treatment was a robust positive predictor of attaining long-term mMDA through 3 years (odds ratios: 11.38-27.13 for mMDA-LEI; 17.98-37.85 for mMDA-SPARCC).

CONCLUSIONS

All four versions of mMDA showed concurrent validity and discriminated well between adalimumab and placebo treatment groups. Early mMDA response is a more consistent predictor of long-term mMDA achievement than baseline characteristics. The 5 of 6 versions of mMDA could be an appropriate treatment target in pSpA patients.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis: a neglected entity-state of the art

Peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) refers to a number of seemingly different spondyloarthritis subsets in which psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common, and symptoms of arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis predominate the clinical presentation. Although formal classification criteria for pSpA have been introduced in 2011, only a minority of epidemiological and clinical studies addressed this clinical entity as a separate disease. Moreover, research on outcome measures and treatment modalities in pSpA has been mainly focused on PsA. Subsequently, all biological treatments are off-label in patients with non-psoriatic pSpA. Its neglected status has important implications for clinical practice since the emerging group of early-diagnosed non-psoriatic pSpA patients remains poorly characterised and lacks specific treatment recommendations. This review summarises what is currently known regarding pSpA in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapeutic approach.

[Systemic manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases]

The article is devoted to the current data regarding the pathogenesis, classification and frequency of extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in inflammatory bowel diseases. We discuss two distinct theories of EIMs pathogenesis. First, EIMs arise from an extension of antigen-specific immune responses from the intestine to non-intestinal sites. Second, EIMs are independent inflammatory events initiated or perpetuated by the presence of IBD or by shared genetic or environmental risk factors in the host. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may contribute to varying degrees in different EIMs. Early diagnosis of EIMs contributes to prevention disability and enhancement of quality of life of IBD patients. It is concluded that treatment of extraintestinal manifestations should be carried out taking into account the course of the IBD and the multidisciplinary approach, which requires close cooperation of doctors of various specialties. Assessment of prognostic markers and predictors for EIM in IBD will be part of a future investigation.

Defining the phenotype, pathogenesis and treatment of Crohn's disease associated spondyloarthritis

Peripheral and axial spondyloarthritis are the most common extra-intestinal manifestations reported in patients with Crohn's disease. Despite the frequency of Crohn's disease associated spondyloarthritis, clinical diagnostic tools are variably applied in these cohorts and further characterization with validated spondyloarthritis disease activity indexes are needed. In addition, the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease associated spondyloarthritis is not well understood. Evidence of shared genetic, cellular, and microbial mechanisms underlying both Crohn's disease and spondyloarthritis highlight the potential for a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Existing treatment paradigms for Crohn's disease associated spondyloarthritis focus on symptom control and management of luminal inflammation. A better understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in Crohn's disease associated spondyloarthritis and the link between the gut microbiome and systemic immunity will help pave the way for more targeted and effective therapies. This review highlights recent work that has provided a framework for clinical characterization and pathogenesis of Crohn's disease associated spondyloarthritis and helps identify critical gaps that will help shape treatment paradigms.

Long-Term Safety of Adalimumab in 29,967 Adult Patients From Global Clinical Trials Across Multiple Indications: An Updated Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The safety profile of adalimumab was previously reported in 23,458 patients across multiple indications. Here we report the long-term safety of adalimumab in adults with plaque psoriasis (Ps), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, peripheral spondyloarthritis, Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and non-infectious uveitis (UV).

METHODS

Safety data from 77 clinical trials were pooled. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) that occurred after the first study dose and within 70 days (5 half-lives) after the last study dose.

RESULTS

A total of 29,967 patients were included, representing 56,916 patient-years (PY) of exposure. The most frequently reported SAE of interest was infection (3.7/100 PY) with highest incidences in CD, RA, UV, and UC (3.5/100 PY-6.9/100 PY); serious infections in Ps (1.8/100 PY) and HS (2.8/100 PY) were lower. The observed number of deaths was below what would be expected in an age- and sex-adjusted population for most adalimumab-treated patients (including Ps). Lack of real-life data and limited long-term data (> 5 years) for most patients are limitations of this analysis.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of adalimumab was consistent with previous findings and no new safety signals were observed.

Secukinumab efficacy on resolution of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies

Background

Enthesitis is one of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. Patients with enthesitis are associated with worse outcomes than those without enthesitis. The effect of secukinumab on the resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA was explored using pooled data from the FUTURE 2 and 3 studies.

Method

Assessments of enthesitis through week 104 used the Leeds Enthesitis Index. These post hoc analyses included resolution of enthesitis count (EC = 0), median time to first resolution of enthesitis (Kaplan-Meϊer estimate), and shift analysis (as observed) of baseline EC (1, 2, or 3–6) to full resolution (FR), stable (similar or reduction of EC), or worse (EC > baseline). Efficacy outcomes (ACR, PASI, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and DAS28-CRP) were assessed in patients with or without baseline enthesitis. Results are reported for secukinumab 300 and 150 mg in the overall population and by prior TNFi treatment.

Results

A total of 65% (466/712) of patients had baseline enthesitis. In the overall population, FR was achieved as early as week 16 in 65% (300 mg) and 56% (150 mg) versus 44% (placebo) patients, with further improvements to 91% (300 mg) and 88% (150 mg) at week 104. The majority (89%) of patients without enthesitis at baseline maintained this status at week 104. Median days to resolution of EC were shorter with secukinumab 300 and 150 mg versus placebo (57 and 85 vs 167 days, respectively). In patients with EC of 1 or 2, shift analysis from baseline to week 24 showed that more patients achieved FR with secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, whereas no difference between secukinumab and placebo was shown in the more severe patients with EC of 3–6. Increases in proportions of patients with FR were observed with secukinumab irrespective of the severity of EC from baseline to week 104. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were similar in patients with or without enthesitis treated with secukinumab 300 mg.

Conclusion

Secukinumab provided early and sustained resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA over 2 years. Secukinumab 300 mg provided higher resolution than 150 mg in patients with more severe baseline EC and showed similar overall efficacy in patients with or without enthesitis.

Trial registration

FUTURE 2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 (date of study registration: December 19, 2012), and EudraCT, 2012-004439-22 (date of study registration: December 12, 2012)

FUTURE 3: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989468 (date of study registration: November 21, 2013), and EudraCT, 2013-004002-25 (date of study registration: December 17, 2013)

Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis

This article discusses treat-to-target strategies in axial spondyloarthritis and current status. Treatment ranging from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to biologic and other disease-modifying drugs is discussed in the context of treat-to-target. The article explores evidence from landmark randomized, controlled trials and observational studies focusing on both radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. The feasibility of treat-to-target, as well as predictors of remission are addressed in line with existing evidence. Finally, issues around management principles and challenges, as well as unmet need in the field, are highlighted.

An update on clinical safety of adalimumab in treating psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 20 randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The current meta-analysis was conducted to better evaluate the role of adalimumab for patients with psoriasis in terms of its safety profile on the basis of eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The following electronic databases such as Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase database involving the index words were screened and identified for qualified studies updated to December 2018. Associated publications and sources were hand-searched for more related details. To further analyze the main outcomes, the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were utilized.

RESULTS

There were a total of 20 RCTs involving respective 3795 and 3266 patients in the adalimumab and control group that met our inclusion criteria. According to the aggregated results, the adalimumab group was highly associated with significant improvement in the incidence of adverse event (AE), infection, and injection site reaction on comparison of the control group. Nevertheless, no remarkable differences were found between the two study groups in terms of the incidence of serious AE, serious infection as well as the discontinuation of study drug caused by AE.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab was proved to be linked to higher incidence of AE, infection, and injection site reaction during the therapy process of psoriasis based on high-quality RCTs. In addition, there was no association between adalimumab therapy and serious AE, serious infection and the discontinuation of study drug caused by AE in patients harboring psoriasis according to eligible RCTs.

The IL-23-IL-17 pathway as a therapeutic target in axial spondyloarthritis

The cytokines IL-23 and IL-17 have an important role in the pathogenesis of, and as a therapeutic target in, both animal models of chronic inflammation and some human chronic inflammatory diseases. The traditional view is that a main source of IL-17 is T cells and that IL-17 production is under the control of IL-23. IL-17 inhibition has shown good efficacy in clinical trials for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a subtype of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) characterized by radiographic evidence of sacroiliitis. On the basis of data from animal models, genetic studies and the investigation of tissue and blood samples from patients with AS, IL-23 had also been predicted to be important in the pathogenesis of this disease and was therefore considered a potential therapeutic target for axSpA. However, two placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials in axSpA of monoclonal antibodies directed against either the p40 protein or the p19 protein of the IL-23 molecule had clear negative results. These findings indicate that IL-23 and IL-17 are at least partly uncoupled in axSpA. Reasons as to why, when and how such an uncoupling might occur are discussed in this Review, with special reference to the unique microenvironment of the subchondral bone marrow in axSpA.

Current Unmet Needs in Spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There was a substantial progress in the field of spondyloarthritis (SpA) in terms of understanding disease mechanisms, early diagnosis, and improved treatment. Nonetheless, several unresolved questions and unmet needs do remain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the diagnostic delay in axial SpA is decreasing, it remains one of the longest in rheumatology. Application of referral strategies, as well as correct application and interpretation of imaging finding in the clinical context, is the main key to early diagnosis of axial SpA. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and interleukin (IL)-17 represent currently two major treatment targets in SpA, while other promising targets such as IL-23 or IL-6 failed in clinical trials. There is an unmet need for strategy trials to optimize and to individualize treatment in SpA. The role of Janus kinases and their blockade in SpA is still to be explored. TNF blockade showed efficacy in peripheral SpA, and other targets (IL-17 and IL-23) should be investigated in clinical trials. Early, effective, and long-term suppression of inflammation is currently the best method to prevent structural damage progression in the spine in axial SpA, while specific effects of IL-17 blockade and of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on new bone formation are still being investigated. This review summarizes the recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of SpA and discusses the current unmet needs in the field.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis: Concept, diagnosis and treatment

Peripheral spondyloarthritis refers to spondyloarthritis with predominant peripheral (arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis) involvement. Diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in the absence of SpA extra-articular manifestations such as uveitis, psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease. Evaluation of disease activity should always include assessment of objective signs of inflammation, particularly in the presence of enthesitis as the sole peripheral manifestation, mainly due to the potential misdiagnosis with fibromyalgia tender points. Several recommendations for management/treatment of psoriatic arthritis have been published by EULAR and GRAPPA but none for peripheral SpA in general. NSAIDs and glucocorticoids are recommended as the first step of treatment in all peripheral manifestations, while conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs seem only efficacious in arthritis. Several biologics and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (TNFi, anti-IL17 and JAK-inhibitors) have been proven to be efficacious in peripheral involvement in PsA (arthritis and enthesitis), but studies on peripheral SpA are lacking.

The Pathogenesis of Extraintestinal Manifestations: Implications for IBD Research, Diagnosis, and Therapy

This article reports on the sixth scientific workshop of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] on the pathogenesis of extraintestinal manifestations [EIMs] in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This paper has been drafted by 15 ECCO members and 6 external experts [in rheumatology, dermatology, ophthalmology, and immunology] from 10 European countries and the USA. Within the workshop, contributors formed subgroups to address specific areas. Following a comprehensive literature search, the supporting text was finalized under the leadership of the heads of the working groups before being integrated by the group consensus leaders.

Simultaneous Adalimumab and Antitubercular Treatment for Latent Tubercular Infection: An Experience from Nepal

Introduction

In Nepal, adalimumab is the most common agent being used, but in a disease activity-based dose tapering to address the economic constraints. Another constraint is the high risk of reactivation of tuberculosis in countries with high burden, especially with the use of tumor necrosis factor blocking agents. Though there are recommendations for screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) before using adalimumab, data is not clear regarding the appropriate screening schedule and the timing of initiation of biologic therapy.

Methodology

This retrospective review of prospectively followed cohort of spondyloarthropathy patients aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous initiation of adalimumab with LTBI treatment. Patients fulfilling either the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis or Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria and who were refractory to oral treatment were screened with Mantoux (≥10mm) and interferon gamma release assay (QuantiFERON) to detected LTBI. Those who tested positive were started on rifampicin/isoniazid combination for 3 months and adalimumab treatment on the same day. The patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and then every 3 months for 2 years.

Results

Out of 784 patients diagnosed, 92 were receiving adalimumab. LTBI was detected by positivity of either Mantoux or QuantiFERON in 29.3% patients. None of the patients with LTBI who were started on the 2 drug regime simultaneous with adalimumab developed activation of tuberculosis. However, two patients testing negative for both the tests developed tubercular pleural effusion during treatment.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that screening for LTBI should be more frequent in patients from high tuberculosis burden countries; treatment of LTBI with rifampicin/isoniazid combination for 3 months is effective in preventing reactivation even when adalimumab is started simultaneously.

An overview of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis

Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are engineered proteins with high affinity for various proinflammatory immune mediators to reduce inflammation and its sequelae in various rheumatic diseases. These medications, introduced at the advent of the 21st century, have revolutionized the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (including ankylosing spondylitis) and psoriatic arthritis. Currently approved bDMARDs for axial spondyloarthritis are etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, and secukinumab. For psoriatic arthritis, all of these drugs are approved in addition to ixekizumab, ustekinumab, abatacept, and tofacitinib. Selection of the optimal bDMARD should consider patient comorbidity including uveitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Unmet need in rheumatology: reports from the Targeted Therapies meeting 2018

To develop a comprehensive listing of the greatest unmet scientific and clinical needs in rheumatology. The 20th annual international Targeted Therapies meeting brought more than 100 leading basic scientists and clinical researchers in rheumatology, immunology, epidemiology, molecular biology and other specialties. During the meeting, breakout sessions were convened, consisting of five disease-specific groups with 20-30 experts assigned to each group based on expertise. Specific groups included rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, connective tissue diseases and a basic science immunology group spanning all of these clinical domains. In each group, experts were asked to consider recent accomplishments within their clinical domain in the last year and update the unmet needs in three categorical areas: basic/translational science, clinical science and therapeutic development, and clinical care. While progress was noted among some of previously identified needs, both new needs were identified and themes from prior meetings were re-iterated: the need for better understanding the heterogeneity within each disease, and for identifying preclinical states of disease allowing treatment and prevention of disease in those at risk, and the elusive ability to cure disease. Within the clinical care realm, improved comorbidity management and patient-centred care continue to be unmet needs, and the need for new and affordable therapeutics was highlighted. Unmet needs for new and accessible targeted therapies, disease prevention and ultimately cure remain a priority in rheumatology.

Efficacy of new treatments for dactylitis of psoriatic arthritis: update of literature review

Dactylitis is a frequent disabling feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Therapeutic strategy on dactylitis is not really codified. We performed a complementary literature review (since a previous one in 2014) of efficacy of new treatments recently used in PsA on this specific clinical manifestation. Eleven publications were retained (4697 patients). In the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials analyzed, authors declared ustekinumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, and apremilast efficient. Secukinumab, clazakizumab, abatacept, and tofacitinib were promising. Brodalumab was ineffective. Calculations of odds ratios for residual dactylitis were significant for clazakizumab 100 mg and secukinumab in anti-TNF-naïve population. Homogenization of dactylitis assessment and use of this criterion as primary outcome are necessary to have better data on treatment efficacy in the future.

Obesity and response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents in patients with select immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the association between obesity and response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) agents, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Through a systematic search through January 24, 2017, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies in adults with select immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathies (SpA), psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)-treated with anti-TNF agents, and reporting outcomes, stratified by body mass index (BMI) categories or weight. Primary outcome was failure to achieve clinical remission or response or treatment modification. We performed random effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Based on 54 cohorts including 19,372 patients (23% obese), patients with obesity had 60% higher odds of failing therapy (OR,1.60; 95% CI,1.39-1.83;I2 = 71%). Dose-response relationship was observed (obese vs. normal BMI: OR,1.87 [1.39-2.52]; overweight vs. normal BMI: OR,1.38 [1.11-1.74],p = 0.11); a 1kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with 6.5% higher odds of failure (OR,1.065 [1.043-1.087]). These effects were observed across patients with rheumatic diseases, but not observed in patients with IBD. Effect was consistent based on dosing regimen/route, study design, exposure definition, and outcome measures. Less than 10% eligible RCTs reported outcomes stratified by BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is an under-reported predictor of inferior response to anti-TNF agents in patients with select immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. A thorough evaluation of obesity as an effect modifier in clinical trials is warranted, and intentional weight loss may serve as adjunctive treatment in patients with obesity failing anti-TNF therapy.

Long-term efficacy and predictors of remission following adalimumab treatment in peripheral spondyloarthritis: 3-year results from ABILITY-2

Objectives

Describe efficacy and safety of 3 years of adalimumab treatment in patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) and identify predictors of remission.

Methods

Patients with pSpA were randomised to adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo for 12 weeks; a 144-week open-label extension followed (NCT01064856). Remission was assessed by the Peripheral SpA Response Criteria (PSpARC) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS ID). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of remission at 1 and 3 years and sustained remission (≥24 consecutive weeks).

Results

In 165 patients, ASDAS ID was achieved by 47% at 1 year and 39% at 3 years; 36% and 33% achieved PSpARC remission, respectively. Sustained ASDAS ID and PSpARC remission were achieved by 52% (86/165) and 42% (70/165) of patients, respectively. Achieving ASDAS ID at week 12 significantly predicted 1 year (OR, 8.64 (95% CI 2.97 to 25.14)), 3 year (OR, 36.12 (95% CI 2.29 to 569.08)) and sustained ASDAS ID (OR, 8.01 (95% CI 2.47 to 25.97)); achieving PSpARC remission at week 12 consistently predicted 1 year (OR, 6.47 (95% CI 1.91 to 21.95)), 3 years (OR, 15.66 (95% CI 4.19 to 58.56)) and sustained PSpARC remission (OR, 20.27 (95% CI 5.37 to 76.46)). No baseline variables consistently predicted 1-year or 3-year remission or sustained remission. The safety profile of adalimumab was consistent with observations in other SpA disease indications.

Conclusions

In patients with pSpA, early response to adalimumab, but not baseline demographics or disease characteristics, was a better predictor of long-term remission.

2018 update of French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations about the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To update French Society for Rheumatology recommendations about the management in clinical practice of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). SpA is considered across the range of clinical phenotypes (axial, peripheral, and entheseal) and concomitant manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis is included among the SpA phenotypes.

METHODS

According to the standard procedure advocated by the EULAR for developing recommendations, we first reviewed the literature published since the previous version of the recommendations issued in June 2013. A task force used the results to develop practice guidelines, which were then revised and graded using AGREE II.

RESULTS

Four general principles and 15 recommendations were developed. The first four recommendations deal with treatment goals and general considerations (assessment tools and comorbidities). Recommendations 5 and 6 are on non-pharmacological treatments. Recommendation 7 is about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are the cornerstone of the treatment, and recommendations 8 to 10 are on analgesics, glucocorticoid therapy, and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Biologics are the focus of recommendations 11 through 14, which deal with newly introduced drug classes, including their indications (active disease despite conventional therapy and, for nonradiographic axial SpA, objective evidence of inflammation) and monitoring, and with patient management in the event of treatment failure or disease remission. Finally, recommendation 15 is about surgical treatments.

CONCLUSION

This update incorporates recent data into a smaller number of more simply formulated recommendations, with the goal of facilitating their use for guiding the management of patients with SpA.

Management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis

INTRODUCTION

More than half of the patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience at least one extra-intestinal manifestation (EIM). The most common EIM in patients with IBD is spondyloarthritis (SpA). Microscopic intestinal inflammation is documented in almost 50% of the patients with SpA. Areas covered: We give an overview of the classification, the epidemiology and the diagnosis of IBD and SpA. The treatment goals, the pharmacologic management options and the available treatment guidelines in IBD patients with SpA are discussed. Expert commentary: The coexistence of IBD and SpA generates challenges and opportunities for both the gastroenterologist and the rheumatologist. The potential of drugs with a gut-specific mode of action in the treatment of IBD-related arthritis warrants further exploration.

Risk of infection in patients with spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis receiving antitumor necrosis factor therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have been widely used for the treatment of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, these agents may increase the risk of infection due to suppressing the immune response. The present meta-analysis was performed to systematically investigate the risk of overall infection, serious infection and tuberculosis in patients with SpA and AS treated with anti-TNF agents. Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1998 and December 2015 about infection in patients with SpA receiving anti-TNF therapy. Data were pooled to obtain relative risks (RRs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 25 RCTs investigating SpA, including 12 investigating AS specifically, were eligible for the meta-analysis. Similar risks of overall infection were reported in patients with SpA (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92–1.15) and AS (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91–1.24) treated with anti-TNF agents. The RR of serious infection for patients with SpA or AS receiving anti-TNF therapy compared with a placebo was 1.27 (95% CI, 0.67–2.38) and 1.57 (95% CI, 0.63–3.91), respectively. In addition, 4 RCTs with outcomes of tuberculosis in patients with SpA receiving anti-TNF agents were identified, all in infliximab-treated patients (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 0.53–12.09). However, due to the limited number of RCTs, this finding should be interpreted with caution. The present meta-analysis did not find any significantly increased risk of infection associated with anti-TNF therapy in patients with SpA or AS. However, due to short duration of follow-up in the RCTs and the rarity of serious infections and tuberculosis, patients treated with anti-TNF agents still should be closely monitored in clinical practice.

Clinical characteristics of peripheral spondyloarthritis without psoriasis, inflammatory enteropathy or preceding infection, from a single rheumatology clinic in northern India

The objective of this study was to characterise the peripheral arthritis of spondyloarthritis (pSpA) excluding psoriatic-, inflammatory enteropathy-related, post-infectious reactive-SpA and arthritis associated with axial SpA/ankylosing spondylitis (axSpA/AS). Patients presenting with the clinical features of the broad spectrum of SpA were screened for the presence of peripheral arthritis using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. The other conditions that could cause pSpA, e.g. psoriasis, inflammatory enteropathy, reactive arthritis and axSpA/AS, were excluded. Their assessment included clinical, laboratory and imaging features. Of a total of 405 patients seen within the spectrum of SpA, 25 (6.2%) patients were identified as pSpA with none of the conditions that could be attributed to their disease. The male to female ratio was 2.6:1; the pattern of involvement was predominantly lower extremity asymmetrical large joint oligoarthritis in persons below the age of 40 years (60% were <30 years of age). Some had soft tissue and/or extra-articular manifestations characteristic of SpA (36%) and family history (20%) of SpA spectrum of diseases. When compared to peripheral arthritis reported in axial axSpA/AS, root/central joint involvement was minimal in pSpA. Otherwise, the pattern of arthritis appeared similar. Exclusive peripheral arthritis without the presence of the other disease-defining conditions is uncommon, seen only in 6.2% of the SpA spectrum diseases. The pattern of joint involvement was similar to that observed with axSpA/AS except that the root/central joints were not seen.

Performance of 3 Enthesitis Indices in Patients with Peripheral Spondyloarthritis During Treatment with Adalimumab

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of enthesitis indices in patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA).

METHODS

The ABILITY-2 study evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) versus placebo (PBO) in patients with active pSpA over 12 weeks. Patients received open-label ADA for an additional 144 weeks. Twenty-nine enthesitis sites used in 3 enthesitis scoring systems [Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index, Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)] were assessed; discriminatory capacity and treatment response at Week 12 were calculated by standardized mean difference (SMD) and Guyatt's effect size (ES). Sites showing resolution or new-onset enthesitis from baseline to Week 12 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 165 patients (ADA, n = 84; PBO, n = 81) were randomized; 143 had ≥ 1 enthesitis site at baseline. The LEI (SMD -0.73, ES -1.07) and SPARCC (SMD -0.56, ES -0.99) enthesitis indices showed higher discriminatory ability and treatment response than MASES (SMD -0.32, ES -0.81). At Week 12, among sites that were positive at baseline, significantly more (p < 0.05) showed resolution among patients treated with ADA versus PBO in the Achilles tendon (60.4% and 36.5%, respectively), medial epicondyle (73.2%, 48.7%), lateral epicondyle (80.6%, 52.8%), and iliac crest (73.5%, 47.2%). Among negative sites at baseline, significantly less (p < 0.05) new-onset enthesitis was observed with ADA versus PBO for Achilles tendon (3.6% and 10.9%, respectively), greater trochanter (3.4%, 14.4%), lateral epicondyle humerus (4.7%, 15.1%), medial femoral condyle (1.6%, 9.2%), and quadriceps insertion superior patella (1.5%, 7.0%).

CONCLUSION

The LEI and SPARCC enthesitis indices showed better discriminatory capacity and treatment response in patients with pSpA versus MASES, likely because these indices contain more peripheral sites.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01064856.