Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibodies in ACPA-Negative and ACPA-Positive Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

The objective of this study was to assess the level of antibodies to carbamylated proteins and analyze the clinical and immunological associations in patients with ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive variants of rheumatoid arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

. The study involved 150 patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and 25 patients as healthy controls. Depending on ACPA values, two groups of patients were recruited: ACPA-positive (n = 75) and ACPA-negative (n = 75). RA activity was assessed by the DAS28 index. Determination of antibodies to carbamylated proteins was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (BlueGene Biotech, China). Quantitative determination of ACPA in serum was performed by enzyme immunoassay using a commercial reagent kit (AxisShield, UK; upper limit of normal 5.0 U/mL; Orgentec, Germany; upper limit of normal 20.0 U/mL).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

. Median anti-CarP in patients with RA was 126.2 [100.83; 157.41] ng/mL and was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in healthy controls (88.89 [70.53; 107.75] ng/mL). Among all patients with RA, 50 (33.3%) were anti-Carp-positive (22 (29.3%) in the ACPA(+) group and 28 (37.3%) in the ACPA(-) group), and one (2%) volunteer from healthy controls was anti-CarP(+) (p = 0.002). In ROC analysis performed to assess the diagnostic significance of anti-CarP for RA for all patients with RA, the area under the curve was 0.783 ± 0.047 with 95% CI: 0.691-0.874 (p < 0.001), with a cut-off point of 143 ng/mL, specificity 96%, sensitivity 36.7%. In the ACPA(+) RA group, the erosion count was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.044) in anti-CarP(+) patients than in anti-CarP(-) patients. A weak direct correlation between anti-CarP and DAS28 was found in the ACPA(-) RA group.

CONCLUSIONS

. We studied the predictive value of anti-CarP as an auxiliary biomarker in ACPA(+) and ACPA(-) subtypes of RA. ACPA(+) anti-CarP(+) patients have a more "erosive" subtype of the disease than ACPA(+) anti-CarP(-) patients. In ACPA(-) patients, anti-CarP helps to identify a more erosive subtype of the disease, and among ACPA(-) patients it helps to reduce the proportion of seronegative patients. Further studies are required to determine the optimal standards for the laboratory diagnosis of anti-CarP and to clarify the diagnostic potential of these ABs as part of the differential diagnosis of arthritis in other rheumatic diseases.

The peculiar features, diversity and impact of citrulline-reactive autoantibodies

Since entering the stage 25 years ago as a highly specific serological biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) have been a topic of extensive research. This hallmark B cell response arises years before disease onset, displays interpatient autoantigen variability, and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Technological and scientific advances have revealed broad clonal diversity and intriguing features including high levels of somatic hypermutation, variable-domain N-linked glycosylation, hapten-like peptide interactions, and clone-specific multireactivity to citrullinated, carbamylated and acetylated epitopes. ACPAs have been found in different isotypes and subclasses, in both circulation and tissue, and are secreted by both plasmablasts and long-lived plasma cells. Notably, although some disease-promoting features have been reported, results now demonstrate that certain monoclonal ACPAs therapeutically block arthritis and inflammation in mouse models. A wealth of functional studies using patient-derived polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies have provided evidence for pathogenic and protective effects of ACPAs in the context of arthritis. To understand the roles of ACPAs, one needs to consider their immunological properties by incorporating different facets such as rheumatoid arthritis B cell biology, environmental triggers and chronic antigen exposure. The emerging picture points to a complex role of citrulline-reactive autoantibodies, in which the diversity and dynamics of antibody clones could determine clinical progression and manifestations.

Performance of Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibody Testing in the Routine Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis from a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Detection of anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factors (RF) in sera support the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, these markers are not detected in about 20% of RA patients. More recently, antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) have emerged with implications for preclinical RA diagnosis. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical performance of anti-CarP and correlate with disease severity in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 331 subjects submitted for RA panel serology: 136 clinically defined RA-positive and 195 RA-negative patients. Fifty additional individuals were recruited for healthy controls. Patients' sera were tested for anti-CCP, anti-CarP, and RF antibodies. Clinical performance characteristics were evaluated for anti-CarP individually and in combination with anti-CCP and RF. Documented erosions and synovitis were correlated with anti-CarP positivity.

RESULTS

Anti-CarP had a clinical sensitivity and specificity of 27% and 94%, respectively, for established RA. This sensitivity was lower than anti-CCP (79%) and RF (85%). The specificity of anti-CarP was similar to anti-CCP (93%) and higher than RF (69%). Anti-CarP in combination with anti-CCP and RF increased specificity (100%) but decreased sensitivity (21%). There was no correlation of anti-CarP positivity with presence of bone erosions; however, there was an increase in anti-CarP positivity among patients with synovitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-CarP demonstrates high specificity in diagnosis of established RA but lacks clinical sensitivity. In combination, anti-CarP does not improve clinical performance of anti-CCP and RF but may be useful in anti-CCP negative patients and in identifying patients with more active disease.

Influence of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies on disease activity and joint erosions in seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis

Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies are promising biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although their significance in seronegative disease (SNRA) remains uncertain. To assess the influence of anti-CarP antibodies on disease activity and erosive joint damage in SNRA patients. In RA patients, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, and anti-CarP antibodies were measured. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28-CRP and SDAI indices, while musculoskeletal ultrasound identified bone erosions. A total of 77 patients were enrolled, comprising 49 with seropositive RA (SPRA) and 28 with SNRA. Notably, 28% of SPRA and 10% of SNRA patients were positive to anti-CarP antibodies. Anti-CarP-positive patients exhibited elevated C-reactive protein (median 10.6, interquartile range 4.6-20.0 vs. 3.4, 1.7-9.9 mg/L; p = 0.005), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (34, 19-46 vs. 16, 7-25 mm/h; p = 0.002), DAS28-CRP (3.2, 2.6-4.2 vs. 2.6, 1.9-3.5; p = 0.048), and SDAI (19.9, 6.3-32.1 vs. 10.9, 5.5-18.1; p = 0.034) indices. Multivariate analysis revealed RF positivity as the sole predictor for anti-CarP antibodies (odds ratio [OR] = 5.9). Musculoskeletal ultrasound revealed bone erosions in 36% of RA patients; 35% among anti-CarP-negative patients and 40% among anti-CarP-positive patients. Notably, RF presence (OR = 44.3) and DAS28-CRP index (OR = 2.4) emerged as predictors of musculoskeletal ultrasound-confirmed erosive joint disease. Anti-CarP antibodies are detected at similar frequencies among both SPRA and SNRA patients. While associated with increased disease activity, these antibodies did not correlate with increased erosive joint damage.

Arthritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: From 2022 International GISEA/OEG Symposium

Musculoskeletal involvement is one of the most common manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with a negative impact on both quality of life and overall prognosis. SLE arthritis can be classified into three different subtypes, with different prevalence and characteristic biomarkers and MRI findings. Identifying the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal manifestations’ development is crucial to develop therapeutic strategies to suppress synovial inflammation, prevent erosions and deformities, and improve SLE patients’ quality of life. Hence, here we discuss the main pathogenetic mechanisms and therapeutic approaches of musculoskeletal manifestations of SLE from the 2022 International GISEA/OEG Symposium.

Anti-Carbamylated Protein (Anti-CarP) Antibodies in Patients Evaluated for Suspected Rheumatoid Arthritis

(1) Background: Anti-carbamylated protein (CarP) antibodies have been studied as novel markers to aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. (2) Methods: A total of 265 samples were included in the evaluation, for which 98 had results for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), 86 for rheumatoid factor (RF), and 212 for 14-3-3 eta protein. Anti-CarP antibodies were measured using a fetal calf serum-based single-step assay (research use only, Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). (3) Results: Anti-CarP antibodies were significantly higher and more frequent in anti-CCP3.1+ (p = 0.0025), RF+ (p = 0.0043) and 14-3-3 eta+ (p = 0.028) samples compared to the negative counterpart group. In addition, isolated anti-CarP positivity occurred in samples negative for anti-CCP3.1, RF, or 14-3-3 eta. When anti-CarP antibodies were compared to each of the RF, anti-CCP3.1, and 14-3-3 eta by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.71 (RF), 0.68 (anti-CCP3.1), and 0.59 (14-3-3 eta), respectively, demonstrated a moderate correlation. Using an UpSet plot, we determined that 10.6% of the samples with available results for anti-CCP3.1, RF, and anti-CarP showed triple positivity. (4) Conclusions: Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies can be detected in anti-CCP, RF and 14-3-3 eta-positive and -negative patients, potentially identifying specific subsets of patients.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies positivity and disease activity in Hispanic patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: An observational study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the prevalence of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies in Mexican Hispanics with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess their relationship with disease activity.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted in 278 patients with established RA during an 18-month follow-up. We measured IgG/IgM/IgA rheumatoid factor (RF), IgG anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and IgG/IgM/IgA anti-CarP antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For disease activity, we performed the 28-joint disease activity score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was used to test the association between anti-CarP IgG antibody status and longitudinal DAS28-ESR scores. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months during follow-up.

RESULTS

Anti-CarP IgG antibodies were positive in 47.8% of patients and, accounting for all isotypes, in 9.5% of patients with negative RF and ACPA. Triple antibody positivity was present in 42.6% of patients in our sample. Anti-CarP IgG antibody positivity did not show statistically significant differences in mean DAS28-ESR when compared to anti-CarP IgG antibody negative patients at baseline, 6, 12 or 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Anti-CarP IgG antibodies are not associated to a higher disease activity in Hispanic patients with established RA. Our findings suggest that the clinical value of measuring anti-CarP antibodies in RA diminishes over time.

Erosive arthritis autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate in two large SSc French cohorts the prevalence and associated factors with the autoantibodies linked to erosive arthritis.

METHODS

448 SSc patients were recruited from May 2015 to January 2019. Standardized clinical and laboratory variables were collected in accordance with the EUSTAR database. ELISAs for IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), IgG anti-citrullinated proteins (ACPA) and IgG anti-carbamylated proteins antibodies (anti-CarP) were all determined in a central laboratory. The prevalence and clinical associations of the different antibodies were investigated.

RESULTS

RF positivity was observed in 113 patients (25%) compared to 39 (9%) for ACPA and 63 (14%) for anti-CarP antibodies. Through multivariate regression analysis, both RF and ACPA positivity resulted to be associated with RA overlap disease (OR 5.7, 95% CI 2.3-13.8 and OR 44.1, 95% CI 15.4-126.3, respectively). Additionally, ACPA was found to be significantly related to synovitis/ tenosynovitis (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). RF positivity was associated to a "vascular subset" (i.e. any major vascular complication) (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4). Moreover, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with a fibrotic subset and with digital ulcers (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6 and OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4).

CONCLUSION

We corroborated that ACPA could be useful in identifying patients with a more prominent joint disease and RA overlap disease. Of the most interest we found that anti-CarP antibodies could be a relevant biomarker related to fibrotic skin and lung disease.

Peptides Bearing Multiple Post-Translational Modifications as Antigenic Targets for Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies that are of paramount importance for the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease and have been implicated in its pathogenesis. Proteins resulting from post-translational modifications (PTMs) are capable of triggering autoimmune responses important for the development of RA. In this work, we investigate serum antibody reactivity in patients with an established RA against a panel of chimeric peptides derived from fibrin and filaggrin proteins and bearing from one to three PTMs (citrullination, carbamylation and acetylation) by home-designed ELISA tests (anti-AMPA autoantibodies). The role of anti-AMPAs as biomarkers linked to the presence of a more severe RA phenotype (erosive disease with radiological structural damage) and to the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), a severe extra-articular manifestation in RA patients entailing a high mortality, was also analyzed. In general, the association with the clinical phenotype of RA was confirmed with the different autoantibodies, and especially for IgA and IgM isotypes. The prevalence of severe joint damage was only statistically significant for the IgG isotype when working with the peptide bearing three PTMs. Furthermore, the median titers were significantly higher in patients with RA-ILD, a finding not observed for the IgG isotype when working with the single- and double-modified peptides.

The Genetic, Environmental, and Immunopathological Complexity of Autoantibody-Negative Rheumatoid Arthritis

Differences in clinical presentation, response to treatment, and long-term outcomes between autoantibody-positive and -negative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) highlight the need for a better comprehension of the immunopathogenic events underlying the two disease subtypes. Whilst the drivers and perpetuators of autoimmunity in autoantibody-positive RA have started to be disclosed, autoantibody-negative RA remains puzzling, also due its wide phenotypic heterogeneity and its possible misdiagnosis. Genetic susceptibility appears to mostly rely on class I HLA genes and a number of yet unidentified non-HLA loci. On the background of such variable genetic predisposition, multiple exogeneous, endogenous, and stochastic factors, some of which are not shared with autoantibody-positive RA, contribute to the onset of the inflammatory cascade. In a proportion of the patients, the immunopathology of synovitis, at least in the initial stages, appears largely myeloid driven, with abundant production of proinflammatory cytokines and only minor involvement of cells of the adaptive immune system. Better understanding of the complexity of autoantibody-negative RA is still needed in order to open new avenues for targeted intervention and improve clinical outcomes.

Human Carbamylome description identifies carbamylated α2-macroglobulin and Hemopexin as two novel autoantigens in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarPA) are present in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) sera and have been associated with erosive disease. The exact targets of anti-CarPA in vivo are currently not well known; we used a proteomic approach on serum and synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients to assess the human carbamylome and to identify carbamylated autoantigens as potential biomarkers in early RA.

METHODS

Mass spectrometry was performed on SF and serum from RA patients. Carbamylated proteins present in both sample types were selected as candidate autoantigens for the establishment of ELISAs. A cohort of early RA patients was tested for positivity for specific anti-CarPA.

RESULTS

Eleven novel carbamylated proteins were identified, and five were selected as potential autoantigens for detection of anti-CarPA. Among them, antibodies against carbamylated Hemopexin (anti-CaHPX) and Alpha-2-macroglobulin (anti-CaA2M) showed comparable diagnostic value to the established carbamylated fetal calf serum-based ELISA. A cohort of 189 early RA patients was studied. The combination of these new biomarkers with antibodies against citrullinated peptides and rheumatoid factor identified 89% of early RA patients in our cohort. There was little correlation between the tested biomarkers, and each one of the tested antigens could identify a different subset of seronegative RA patients. Anti-CaA2M positivity showed clinical potential, being associated with higher disease disability.

CONCLUSION

We highlight the detection of novel carbamylated autoantigens in vivo using a combined proteomic approach in SF and serum of RA patients. Anti-CaHPX and anti-CaA2M are promising clinical biomarkers, especially in seronegative RA.

Anti-Carbamylated Fibrinogen Antibodies Might Be Associated With a Specific Rheumatoid Phenotype and Include a Subset Recognizing In Vivo Epitopes of Its γ Chain One of Which Is Not Cross Reactive With Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies

To identify the targets recognized by anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) in patients with early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), to study the cross-reactivity between anti-CarP and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and to evaluate their prognostic value. 331 patients (184 RA and 147 other rheumatisms) from the Very Early Arthritis (VErA) French cohort were analyzed. We performed mass spectrometry analysis of RA sera displaying anti-CarP activity and epitope mapping of the carbamylated fibrinogen γ chain to identify immunodominant peptides. The specificity of these targets was studied using competition assays with the major antigens recognized by ACPA. The prognostic value of anti-carbamylated fibrinogen IgG antibodies (ACa-Fib IgG) was compared to that of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) and anti-CarP using an in-house ELISA. Besides the α chain, the γ chain of fibrinogen, particularly one immunodominant epitope that has a specific reactivity, was identified as a circulating carbamylated target in sera. The prevalence of ACa-Fib was 37% at baseline and 10.9% for anti-CCP-negative RA. In anti-CCP-negative patients, ACa-Fib positivity was associated with a more inflammatory and erosive disease at baseline but not with rapid radiological progression, which remains strongly related to anti-CCP antibodies. Fibrinogen seems to be one of the antigens recognized in vivo by the anti-CarP response, particularly 2 epitopes of the γ chain, one of which is not cross reactive with ACPA. This specificity might be associated with a distinct clinical phenotype since ACa-Fib IgG were shown to be linked to systemic inflammation in very early RA but not to rapid radiological progression.

Erosive arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus: not only Rhupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-related arthritis has been traditionally defined as non-erosive and is therefore considered a minor manifestation requiring a mild treatment. However, the concept of non-erosive arthritis in SLE has been challenged with the advent of sensitive imaging techniques, such as high-resolution ultrasound with power Doppler or magnetic resonance. The application of these new imaging tools has demonstrated that up to 40% of SLE patients with joint involvement can develop erosive damage. Thus, this more aggressive phenotype can be identified not only in patients overlapping with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This issue has been considered for the first time in the classification criteria proposed by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics in 2012, in which the old definition of "non-erosive arthritis" was replaced with either synovitis or tenderness in two or more joints with morning stiffness, suggesting the possible presence of an erosive phenotype. Accordingly, the 2019 EULAR/ACR's SLE recommendations advise treatment with immunosuppressant or biological drugs for patients with RA-like moderate arthritis. As a result, several studies have investigated the presence of biomarkers associated with SLE erosive damage. A relevant role seems to be played by the autoantibodies directed against post-translational modified proteins: above all, a significant association has been observed with antibodies directed against citrullinated and carbamylated proteins. Conversely, the rheumatoid factor was not associated with this more aggressive SLE-related arthritis. Nonetheless, some pro-inflammatory factors have been associated with erosive damage in SLE patients. These results suggest new pathogenic mechanisms underlining erosive arthritis, only partially shared with RA. Hence, in the present narrative review, we summarized available data about erosive arthritis in SLE patients, in the light of its impact on therapeutic decisions.

Impact of Posttranslational Modification in Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Focusing on Citrullination, Carbamylation, and Acetylation

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is caused by prolonged periodic interactions between genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors. Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) such as citrullination, carbamylation, and acetylation are correlated with the pathogenesis of RA. PTM and cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis, autophagy, NETosis, leukotoxic hypercitrullination (LTH), and necrosis are related to each other and induce autoantigenicity. Certain microbial infections, such as those caused by Porphyromonasgingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Prevotella copri, can induce autoantigens in RA. Anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPA) containing anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPAs), anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies, and anti-acetylated protein antibodies (AAPAs) play a role in pathogenesis as well as in prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis. Interestingly, smoking is correlated with both PTMs and AMPAs in the development of RA. However, there is lack of evidence that smoking induces the generation of AMPAs.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies in premenopausal rheumatoid arthritis women: relation to disease activity and bone loss

OBJECTIVES

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP Abs) are present in patients with RA, however, their association with bone loss is not confirmed. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between the serum level of anti-CarP Abs in premenopausal RA women and disease activity and bone loss.

METHODS

This case-control study was conducted on 48 premenopausal women with RA and 48 matched healthy premenopausal women. All RA women were subjected to clinical examination, disease activity assessment using the 28-joint DAS (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), functional assessment using the HAQ, physical activity assessment using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), fatigue assessment using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), serological tests as well as anti-CarP Abs using ELISA. Moreover, the BMD was measured by DXA and plain X-ray of both hands was done to assess juxta-articular osteopenia and erosions.

RESULTS

The anti-CarP Abs level was significantly higher in RA patients than in healthy controls. The serum level of anti-CarP Abs had a significant positive correlation with the RA DAS28, CDAI, HAQ, MFIS and original Sharp score, while a significant negative correlation was present with the IPAQ. Anti-CarP Abs were negatively correlated with either spine BMD or Z-score and positively correlated with the original Sharp score.

CONCLUSION

Anti-CarP Abs were higher in premenopausal RA women compared with older and BMI matched healthy women. Anti-CarP Abs are associated with higher RA disease activity, increased disability and fatigability and decreased physical activity. Moreover, anti-CarP Abs are associated with systemic trabecular bone loss as well as local bone loss.

Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives

Measurement of two groups of autoantibodies, rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) have gained increasing significance in the diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the last 65 years. Despite this rising importance of autoimmune serology in RA, there is a palpable lack of harmonization between different commercial RF and ACPA tests. While a minimal diagnostic specificity has been defined for RF tests, which almost always are related to an international reference preparation, neither of this applies to ACPA. Especially assays with low diagnostic specificity are associated with very low positive predictive values or post-test probabilities in real world settings. In this review we focus on issues of practical bearing for the clinical physician diagnosing patients who potentially have RA, or treating patients diagnosed with RA. We advocate that all clinically used assays for RF and ACPA should be aligned to a common diagnostic specificity of 98-99% compared to healthy controls. This high and rather narrow interval corresponds to the diagnostic specificity seen for many commercial ACPA tests, and represents a specificity that is higher than what is customary for most RF assays. Data on antibody occurrence harmonized in this way should be accompanied by test result-specific likelihood ratios for the target diagnosis RA on an ordinal or interval scale, which will provide the clinical physician with more granular and richer information than merely relating numerical values to a single cut-off point. As many physicians today are used to evaluate autoantibodies as positive or negative on a nominal scale, the introduction of test result-specific likelihood ratios will require a change in clinical mindset. We also discuss the use of autoantibodies to prognosticate future arthritis development in at-risk patients as well as predict severe disease course and outcome of pharmacological treatment.

Increased disease activity in early arthritis patients with anti-carbamylated protein antibodies

The initial management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a high impact on disease prognosis. Therefore, we need to select the most appropriate treatment as soon as possible. This goal requires biomarkers of disease severity and prognosis. One such biomarker may be the presence of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (ACarPA) because it is associated with adverse long term outcomes as radiographic damage and mortality. Here, we have assessed the ACarPA as short-term prognostic biomarkers. The study was conducted in 978 prospective early arthritis (EA) patients that were followed for two years. Our results show the association of ACarPA with increased levels of all the disease activity measures in the first visit after arthritis onset. However, the associations were more significant with the high levels in local measures of inflammation and physician assessment than with the increases in systemic inflammation and patient-reported outcomes. More notably, disease activity was persistently increased in the ACarPA positive patients during the two years of follow-up. These differences were significant even after accounting for the presence of other RA autoantibodies. Therefore, the ACarPA could be considered short-term prognostic biomarkers of increased disease activity in the EA patients.

The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients

Background:

Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs).

Methods:

A total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies.

Results:

Rates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs (r_s = 0.39), RF and ACPAs, (r_s = 0.3) and RF and anti-CarP, (r_s = 0.3). There was no correlation between ACPAs and anti-CarP. Anti-CarP positivity was noted in 49 (47.1%) and 45 (54.9%) of ACPAs and RF positive patients respectively. In addition, five anti-CarP+ patients did not have ACPA nor RF.

Conclusion:

Anti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy.

Predictive value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 antibodies alone or in combination with RF and ACPA for the severity of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to analyse the predictive value of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-peptidyl-arginine deiminase type-3 (anti-PAD3) antibodies, alone or in combination with RF and ACPA, to identify patients at high risk of developing severe RA outcomes.

METHODS

Patients within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management registry with a biobank sample were tested for RF, ACPA, anti-CarP, and anti-PAD3 antibodies. We examined the association of each autoantibody with DAS28, HAQ and radiographic damage (Ratingen) at baseline and longitudinally.

RESULTS

Analyses included 851 established RA patients and 516 disease controls [axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA = 320) and PsA (196)]. Anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 antibodies were, respectively, present in 22.4% and 10.7% of the whole RA population, and in 13.2% and 3.8% of the RF and ACPA double seronegative patients. At baseline, RA patients with anti-PAD3 had higher DAS28 (4.2 vs 3.7; P= 0.005) and significantly more radiographic damage (14.9 vs 8.8; P= 0.02) than anti-PAD3-negative patients. In the ACPA-negative subgroup, baseline Ratingen scores were significantly higher in anti-PAD3-positive patients (P= 0.01). The combination of anti-PAD3, RF IgM, and ACPA was associated with significantly higher baseline radiographic scores than the double seropositive group (P= 0.04). The presence of any two of the previous autoantibodies was associated with significantly greater radiographic progression over 10 years than if all were absent (P= 0.02). There were no differences in RA outcome measures with regards to anti-CarP.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PAD3 antibodies are associated with higher disease activity and joint damage scores in RA patients.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibody isotype pattern differs between palindromic rheumatism and rheumatoid arthritis

Background

A restricted response against citrullinated peptides/proteins, with less isotype usage, has been found in palindromic rheumatism (PR) in comparison with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that this different antibody response may be observed for other post-translational modified proteins. We compared the prevalence and isotype usage of two specificities of anti-carbamylated peptide/protein antibodies (Anti-CarP) in patients with PR and RA.

Methods

Cross-sectional study including 54 patients with pure PR and 53 patients with RA, matched by sex, age, disease duration and ACPA. Anti-CarP specificities were determined by home-made enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests using a synthetic chimeric fibrin/filaggrin homocitrullinated peptide (CFFHP) and fetal calf serum (FCS) homocitrullinated protein as antigens. IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes were measured.

Results

Anti-CarP were positive (CFFHP or FCS) in 24% and 64% of patients with PR and RA, respectively (p < 0.005). All Anti-CarP isotype proportions were significantly lower in PR than in RA: Anti-CarP-IgG (24% versus 51%), Anti-CarP-IgA (7% versus 34%) and Anti-CarP-IgM (7% versus 36%). Mean titers of Anti-CarP isotypes were also lower in PR. In Anti-CarP positive patients, the isotype distribution differed between PR and RA: IgG Anti-CarP was used in all PR patients and in 79% of RA patients. By contrast, a significantly lower isotype usage of both IgA (31% versus 53%) and IgM (31% versus 56%) was observed in PR patients. No significant differences in clinical or demographic characteristics were observed according to Anti-CarP status in PR patients, except for a higher prevalence of ACPA and higher mean titers of ACPA and rheumatoid factor in Anti-CarP positive patients.

Conclusion

Anti-CarP are found in patients with PR but in a lower proportion and with a different isotype usage from in RA, suggesting a distinct B cell response to homocitrullinated antigens in PR.

Anti-carbamylated protein and peptide antibodies as potential inflammatory joint biomarkers in the relatives of rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE

Antibodies against carbamylated proteins/peptide (CarP) have been associated with severity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, their role in risk groups, specific targets and relation with periodontal disease (PD) is uncertain yet. The aim of this study was evaluated the association between the levels of anti-CarP with clinical manifestation, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, periodontal activity markers, PD diagnosis, PD severity, and presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P gingivalis) in relatives of patients with RA.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four individuals with a family history of RA in first-degree relatives (FDR) and 124 healthy individuals gender- and age-matched, RA activity was assessed. Antibodies against carbamylated protein anti-FCS-Carp and 2 carbamylated peptides of fibrinogen were selected (anti-Ca-Fib2, anti-Ca-Fib3).

RESULTS

Anti-FCS-Carp-positive, anti-Ca-Fib2 and anti-Ca-Fib3 were more frequent in FDR than controls (25.0% vs 14.5%, 34.7% vs 15.3% and 33.1% vs 11.3%, respectively). Anti-FCS-CarP were associated with the HLA-DRB1-SE* 1402 allele (P = .035) and highly sensitive C-reactive protein levels (P = .016), the anti-Ca-Fib2 antibodies were associated with the HLA-DRB1-SE* 1501 allele (P = .03), with non-SE* 0901 allele (P = .01), the anti-Ca-Fib3 was associated with positive rheumatoid factor (P = .0012). The FDR condition was associated with the presence of anti-Ca-Fib3 (odds ratio [OR] =4.7; 95% CI = 1.8-11.7; P = .001) and painful joints (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.01-4.68; P = .045); we also detected an important trend toward the presence of P gingivalis (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 0.9-3.7; P = .062).

CONCLUSION

The presence of anti-FCS-Carp, anti-Ca-Fib3 and anti-Ca-Fib2 antibodies may have a role for these antibodies as early biomarkers in the development of RA, probably including additional mechanisms related with other non-SE alleles; the anti-peptide antibodies proposed in the present study may represent a simpler way to identify antibodies directed to a specific target.

Elevated levels of anti-carbamylated protein antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: association with disease activity and bone destruction

To measure the serum levels of anticarbamylated protein (CarP) antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China and to evaluate the association of anti-CarP antibodies with clinical parameters and disease activity. 260 Chinese patients with RA, 40 patients with osteoarthritis (OA), 88 patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and 77 healthy controls were included. The serum levels of anti-CarP antibodies were detected by ELISA. Blood tests to detect the anticyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody level, rheumatoid factor (RF) level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein level and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) were performed by standard methods. Bone erosion was assessed by colour Doppler ultrasonography. A total of 18.8% of patients with RA and 9.4% of anti-CCP antibody and RF-double-negative patients were positive for anti-CarP antibody. The anti-CarP antibody level was significantly higher in patients with RA than in patients with OA or SpA and in healthy controls. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the level of anti-CarP antibody was positively correlated with DAS28-ESR; the higher a level of serum anti-CarP antibody, the higher the DAS28-ESR score. Anti-CarP-positive patients had higher disease activity scores than anti-CarP-negative patients. Moreover, anti-CarP-positive patients had a higher risk of developing bone erosion. The anti-CarP antibody was found to play an important role in the diagnosis of RA, especially in anti-CCP antibody and RF-double-negative patients. The anti-CarP antibody is a potential marker of disease activity and bone erosion in RA.

Presence of autoantibodies in "seronegative" rheumatoid arthritis associates with classical risk factors and high disease activity

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classified as seropositive or seronegative, depending on the presence/absence of rheumatoid factor (RF), primarily IgM RF, and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), commonly detected using anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) assays. Known risk factors associate with the more severe seropositive form of RA; less is known about seronegative RA. Here, we examine risk factors and clinical phenotypes in relation to presence of autoantibodies in the RA subset that is traditionally defined as seronegative.

Methods

Anti-CCP2 IgG, 19 ACPA fine-specificities, IgM/IgG/IgA RF, anti-carbamylated-protein (CarP) antibodies, and 17 other autoantibodies, were analysed in 2755 RA patients and 370 controls. Antibody prevalence, levels, and co-occurrence were examined, and associations with risk factors and disease activity during 5 years were investigated for different antibody-defined RA subsets.

Results

Autoantibodies were detected in a substantial proportion of the traditionally defined seronegative RA subset, with ACPA fine-specificities found in 30%, IgA/IgG RF in 9.4%, and anti-CarP antibodies in 16%, with a 9.6% co-occurrence of at least two types of RA-associated autoantibodies. HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) associated with the presence of ACPA in anti-CCP2-negative RA; in anti-CCP2-positive RA, the SE association was defined by six ACPA fine-specificities with high co-occurrence. Smoking associated with RF, but not with ACPA, in anti-CCP2-negative RA. Presence of ACPA and RF, but not anti-CarP antibodies, in conventionally defined “seronegative” RA, associated with worse clinical outcome.

Conclusions

“Seronegative” RA is not truly a seronegative disease subset. Additional screening for ACPA fine-specificities and IgA/IgG RF defines a group of patients that resembles seropositive patients with respect to risk factors and clinical picture and may contribute to earlier diagnosis for a subset of anti-CCP2−/IgM RF− patients with a high need for active treatment.

The effect of sex on immune responses to a homocitrullinated peptide in the DR4-transgenic mouse model of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is more common and severe in women compared to men. Both women and men with RA express autoantibodies to post-translationally modified antigens, including citrullinated and homocitrullinated proteins or peptides. These autoantibodies are strongly linked with the HLA-DR4 gene. The objective of this study was to determine sex differences in immune responses to homocitrullinated antigens. We used a humanized animal model of RA, DR4-transgenic mice and immunized them with a homocitrullinated peptide called HomoCitJED. Immune responses in these mice were measured for splenocyte proliferation by tritiated thymidine incorporation, serum autoantibody production by ELISA and cytokine levels by multiplex. We found that T cell and antibody responses to homocitrullinated antigens were similar in male and female mice. However, we found sex differences in serum cytokine profiles with female mice having higher ratio of IL-1α to IL-5, suggesting imbalances in immune regulation. This is the first study to report that immune responses to homocitrullinated antigens can be differentiated by sex.

•

Splenocyte proliferation and antibody responses in DR4tg mice immunized with a homocitrullinated peptide were similar for females and males.

•

The cytokine profile of homocitrullinated peptide-immunized DR4tg mice was differentiated by sex: females had a higher ratio of IL-1α to IL-5.

•

Anti-homocitrullinated peptide splenocyte and antibody responses were more frequent in DR4tg than wild-type B6 mice.

Anti-carbamylated proteins antibody repertoire in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence of a new autoantibody linked to interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the association between anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (Anti-CarP) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study including RA patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. The main population comprised two groups: (1) RA patients diagnosed with RA-ILD (RA-ILD group); (2) RA patients without ILD (non-ILD RA group). Non-ILD RA patients in whom ILD was suspected underwent a diagnostic work-up and, if ILD was diagnosed, were switched to the RA-ILD group. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution computed tomography and confirmed by a multidisciplinary committee. An independent replication sample was also obtained. Three Anti-CarP IgG autoantibodies against fetal calf serum (Anti-FCS), fibrinogen (Anti-Fib) and chimeric fibrine/filagrine homocitrullinated peptide (Anti-CFFHP) and one Anti-CarP IgA against FCS (Anti-FCS-IgA) were determined by home-made ELISA. Associations between Anti-CarP and ILD were analysed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted by smoking, sex, age, RA disease duration, rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies.

RESULTS

We enrolled 179 patients: 37 (21%) were finally diagnosed with RA-ILD. Anti-CarP specificities were more frequent in RA-ILD patients (Anti-FCS 70% vs 43%; Anti-Fib 73% vs 51%; Anti-CFFHP 38% vs 19%; Anti-CarP-IgA 51% vs 20%, p<0.05 for all comparisons). Serum titers of Anti-CarP were significantly higher in RA-ILD patients. Anti-CarP specificities showed a robust effect towards increasing the odds of ILD in the multivariate analysis (Anti-FCS (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.13 to 10.40), Anti-Fib (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 0.83 to 9.70), Anti-CFFHP (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.06 to 9.14) and Anti-FCS-IgA (OR: 4.30; 95% CI: 1.41 to 13.04)). Similar findings were observed in the replication sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-CarP were strongly associated with ILD. The role of homocitrullination in RA-ILD merits further investigation.

Autoantibodies and B Cells: The ABC of rheumatoid arthritis pathophysiology

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by joint inflammation. In the last few decades, new insights into RA‐specific autoantibodies and B cells have greatly expanded our understanding of the disease. The best‐known autoantibodies in RA—rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti‐citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA)—are present long before disease onset, and both responses show signs of maturation around the time of the first manifestation of arthritis. A very intriguing characteristic of ACPA is their remarkably high abundance of variable domain glycans. Since these glycans may convey an important selection advantage of citrulline‐reactive B cells, they may be the key to understanding the evolution of the autoimmune response. Recently discovered autoantibodies targeting other posttranslational modifications, such as anti‐carbamylated and anti‐acetylated protein antibodies, appear to be closely related to ACPA, which makes it possible to unite them under the term of anti‐modified protein antibodies (AMPA). Despite the many insights gained about these autoantibodies, it is unclear whether they are pathogenic or play a causal role in disease development. Autoreactive B cells from which the autoantibodies originate have also received attention as perhaps more likely disease culprits. The development of autoreactive B cells in RA largely depends on the interaction with T cells in which HLA “shared epitope” and HLA DERAA may play an important role. Recent technological advances made it possible to identify and characterize citrulline‐reactive B cells and acquire ACPA monoclonal antibodies, which are providing valuable insights and help to understand the nature of the autoimmune response underlying RA. In this review, we summarize what is currently known about the role of autoantibodies and autoreactive B cells in RA and we discuss the most prominent hypotheses aiming to explain the origins and the evolution of autoimmunity in RA.

Predictors of good response to conventional synthetic DMARDs in early seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: data from the ESPOIR cohort

Background and objective

Early seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a specific entity, especially regarding diagnostic issues and prognosis. Little is known about its potentially different initial clinical presentation and outcome. We aimed to determine predictors of good response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in seronegative RA patients with early inflammatory arthritis.

Patients and methods

Patients from the ESPOIR cohort with early inflammatory arthritis fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA despite negativity for both rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies. The primary endpoint was a good or moderate EULAR response assessed after 1 year of follow-up, given at least 3 months of treatment with a csDMARD. Secondary objectives were to compare the early therapeutic response to methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) versus other csDMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine) and to identify factors associated with functional disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI] > 0.5 at 1 year) and structural progression (van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score > 1 and > 5 points at 1 year). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of outcomes.

Results

One hundred seventy-two patients were analyzed. Overall, 98/172 (57%) patients received MTX during the first year of follow-up. A good or moderate EULAR response at 1 year was associated with early use of csDMARDs (i.e., within 3 months after the first joint swelling) on univariate and multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 2.41 [95% confidence interval 1.07–5.42], p = 0.03). Response rates were not affected by other classical prognostic factors (i.e., baseline DAS28). Presence of erosions at baseline was associated with Sharp score progression > 1 point and > 5 points (both p = 0.03) at 1 year. HAQ-DI ≥ 1 at inclusion and active smoking were significantly associated with HAQ-DI > 0.5 at 1 year.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that delay in initiation of csDMARD more than baseline clinical, biological, or imaging features predominantly affects the outcome in early seronegative RA. These findings confirm that the usual therapeutic concepts in RA (early treatment, tight control, and treat-to-target) should be applied similarly to both seropositive and seronegative disease forms.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03666091. Registered September 11, 2018.

The B side of rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis

In the last years, a dramatic amount of research has been performedincreasing the knowledge about the biological mechanism underpinning Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) inflammation, putting B lymphocytes in the center of RA pathogenesis. Nowadays, B cell phenotypes and autoantibodies positivity arose as important biomarkers in early and long-standing disease. Moreover, comparative analysis of peripheral blood and synovial tissue compartments enables the identification of novel physiopathological mechanisms promoting inflammation. In this narrative review we will discuss the biological relevance of B cell derived autoimmunity and in RA course, from disease onset to remission achievement.

Autophagy induces protein carbamylation in fibroblast-like synoviocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

Autophagy is a homeostatic and physiological process that promotes the turnover of proteins and organelles damaged in conditions of cellular stress. We previously demonstrated that autophagy represents a key processing event creating a substrate for autoreactivity, which is involved in post-translational changes and generation of citrullinated peptides, recognized by the immune system in RA. In this study, we analysed whether autophagy is involved in other post-translational changes that can generate autoantigens, focusing on carbamylation processes. Carbamylation is a nonenzymatic post-translational modification, in which homocitrulline is generated by the reaction of cyanate with the primary amine of lysine residues; carbamylated peptides may accumulate during inflammation conditions.

Methods

The role of autophagy in the generation of carbamylated proteins was evaluated in vitro in fibroblasts as well as in synoviocytes from RA patients, treated with 5 μM tunicamycin or 200 nM rapamycin; the correlation between autophagy and carbamylated proteins was analysed in mononuclear cells from 30 naïve early-active RA patients.

Results

Our results demonstrated that cells treated with tunicamycin or rapamycin showed a significant increase of carbamylated proteins. Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation experiments identified vimentin as the main carbamylated protein. Furthermore, a correlation was found between autophagy and carbamylation levels in mononuclear cells of naïve RA patients.

Conclusion

These data indicate that autophagy is able to induce in vitro carbamylation processes, and in vivo appears to be related to an increase in carbamylation during RA. These observations introduce a new pathogenetic mechanism of disease, which could contribute to more accurate monitoring of patients.

Clinical and etiological meaning of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis

Several autoantibodies against proteins with post-translational modifications have been detected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are called anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs). Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (Anti-CarP Ab) are the second most vigorously researched AMPAs following anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA). Anti-CarP Ab and ACPA show cross-reactivity to some extent and frequently co-exist with each other in RA, but are two distinct antibodies. Although the diagnostic efficacy of anti-CarP Ab is inferior to that of ACPA, the diagnostic specificity of RA may improve when used in combination with ACPA and rheumatoid factor. Anti-CarP Ab and ACPA are also useful for identifying patients at high risk of more severe joint destruction and cardiovascular diseases. The high prevalence of the co-existence of both antibodies suggests a common factor in their production, and this is important for the development of RA because both antibodies emerge before the onset of clinical symptoms. Neutrophils may also be crucially involved. It is important to distinguish citrullinated antigens from carbamylated antigens because the methods commonly used to detect the former are now known to be cross-reactive with the latter. Research on anti-CarP Ab will provide novel insights into the pathology and etiology of RA.

Specific Association of HLA-DRB1*03 With Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibodies in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Recognition of a new type of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-specific autoantibody, the anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP), has provided an opportunity to improve the management and understanding of RA. The current study was undertaken to assess the relationship between anti-CarP antibodies and HLA-DRB1 alleles in RA.

METHODS

Serum samples were obtained from 3 different collections, comprising a total of 1,126 RA patients. Serum reactivity against in vitro carbamylated fetal calf serum proteins was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. HLA-DRB1 alleles were determined using either hybridization techniques or imputation from HLA-dense genotypes. Results of these analyses were combined in a meta-analysis with data from 3 previously reported cohorts. The carrier frequencies of the common HLA-DRB1 alleles were compared between the antibody-positive RA subgroups and the double-negative subgroup of RA patients stratified by anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)/anti-CarP antibody status, and also between the 4 RA patient strata and healthy controls.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis was conducted with 3,709 RA patients and 2,305 healthy control subjects. Results revealed a significant increase in frequency of HLA-DRB1*03 carriers in the ACPA-/anti-CarP+ subgroup as compared to ACPA-/anti-CarP- RA patients and healthy controls; this was consistently found across the 6 sample collections. This association of HLA-DRB1*03 with ACPA-/anti-CarP+ RA was independent of the presence of the shared allele (SE) and any other confounders analyzed. No other allele was specifically associated with the ACPA-/anti-CarP+ RA patient subgroup. In contrast, frequency of the SE was significantly increased in the ACPA+/anti-CarP- and ACPA+/anti-CarP+ RA patient subgroups, without a significant distinction between them. Furthermore, some alleles (including HLA-DRB1*03) were associated with protection from ACPA+ RA.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate a specific association of HLA-DRB1*03 with ACPA-/anti-CarP+ RA, suggesting that preferential presentation of carbamylated peptides could be a new mechanism underlying the contribution of HLA alleles to RA susceptibility.

In rheumatoid arthritis, changes in autoantibody levels reflect intensity of immunosuppression, not subsequent treatment response

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies like rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 (anti-CCP2), and anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies. It is currently unclear whether changes in autoantibody levels are associated with disease activity/treatment outcomes and whether they are modified by treatment intensity. Therefore, we determined longitudinal changes in RA-autoantibody levels, the association between these changes and activity score (DAS) and treatment outcomes, and the effect of intensity of immunosuppressive treatment on levels.

Methods

In 381 seropositive RA patients from the IMPROVED study, we measured IgG, IgM, and IgA of anti-CCP2 and anti-CarP; IgM and IgA of RF; and IgG against four citrullinated and two acetylated peptides at 4-month intervals over the first year of treatment. Following initial prednisone and methotrexate (MTX), treatment was changed every 4 months aiming for DAS < 1.6. We investigated changes in autoantibody levels following treatment escalation versus tapering, and the association of levels with DAS over time, EULAR response, and drug-free remission (DFR) ≥ 1 year.

Results

For all 14 autoantibodies, levels decreased from 0 to 4 months and then rose until 12 months. Following treatment escalation, autoantibody levels dropped markedly, while they rose following tapering: RF IgM levels, a representative autoantibody, dropped 10% after restarting prednisone and rose 15% aU/mL after tapering MTX (p < 0.0001). There was no association between autoantibody levels and DAS over time or EULAR response. Greater relative changes between 0 and 12 months did not predict DFR (0–12-month relative change RF IgM, − 39% for no DFR (n = 126) and − 16% for DFR (n = 18)).

Conclusions

Changes in RA-autoantibody levels are not associated with DAS or long-term treatment response, but reflect intensity of immunosuppression. This suggests that autoantibody levels are modifiable by current therapies, but that modifying levels is in itself of limited clinical relevance.

Trial registration

ISRCTN11916566. Registered on 7 November 2006

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1815-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association of high titers of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies with decreased bone mineral density in early arthritis patients

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a negative impact on bone that is partly mediated by anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies (ACPA). These antibodies are associated with erosions, and with juxta-articular and systemic bone loss. Other RA autoantibodies, the anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarPA), are independently associated with erosions. However, we do not know if they are also associated with juxta-articular and systemic bone loss. Here, we have addressed this question with data from 548 early arthritis (EA) patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH) and metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP). The 25.9% anti-CarPA positive patients did not show significant differences in BMD Z-scores with the negative patients. Nevertheless, this result was due to the similarity between negative and low-positive (below the median of the positive) patients, whereas the high-positive patients showed significant decrease of BMD at LS (β = -0.39, p = 0.01) and TH (β = -0.30, p = 0.02); but not at the juxta-articular bone of MCP. Given the overlap between anti-CarPA and ACPA, we included the two autoantibodies in an analysis that showed significantly lower BMD Z-scores at LS and TH (p< 0.01) only in the ACPA positive/anti-CarPA high-positive subgroup. However, the similar coefficients of regression between the ACPA positive/anti-CarPA high-positive and the ACPA negative/anti-CarPA high-positive subgroups (β = -0.50 vs. -0.52 at LS, and β = -0.37 vs. -0.30 at TH) suggested an independent association. Overall, these results support a contribution of anti-CarPA to systemic bone loss in EA patients.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies as a new biomarker of erosive joint damage in systemic lupus erythematosus

Background

The application of more sensitive imaging techniques, such as ultrasonography (US), changed the concept of non-erosive arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), underlining the need for biomarkers to identify patients developing the erosive phenotype. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), associated with erosions in inflammatory arthritis, have been identified in about 50% of patients with SLE with erosive arthritis. More recently, anti-carbamylated proteins antibodies (anti-CarP) have been associated with erosive damage in rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the association between anti-CarP and erosive damage in a large SLE cohort with joint involvement.

Methods

We evaluated 152 patients (male/female patients 11/141; median age 46 years, IQR 16; median disease duration 108 months, IQR 168). All patients underwent blood draw to detect rheumatoid factor (RF) and ACPA (commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit), and anti-CarP (“home-made” ELISA, cutoff 340 aU/mL). The bone surfaces of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints were assessed by US: the presence of erosions was registered as a dichotomous value (0/1), obtaining a total score (0–20).

Results

The prevalence of anti-CarP was 28.3%, similar to RF (27.6%) and significantly higher than ACPA (11.2%, p = 0.003). Erosive arthritis was identified in 25.6% of patients: this phenotype was significantly associated with anti-CarP (p = 0.004). Significant correlation between anti-CarP titer and US erosive score was observed (r = 0.2, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Significant association was identified between anti-CarP and erosive damage in SLE-related arthritis, in terms of frequency and severity, suggesting that these antibodies can represent a biomarker of severity in patients with SLE with joint involvement.

Does information on novel identified autoantibodies contribute to predicting the progression from undifferentiated arthritis to rheumatoid arthritis: a study on anti-CarP antibodies as an example

BACKGROUND

The presence of autoantibodies is considered an important characteristic of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, both anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are included in the 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a considerable number of RA patients lack both these autoantibodies. Recently, several novel autoantibodies have been identified but their value for the classification of RA patients is unclear. Therefore, we studied the value of novel autoantibodies using the presence of anticarbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies as an example for predicting RA development in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA).

METHODS

There were 1352 UA patients included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) cohort according to the 1987 criteria. When the 2010 criteria were used, there were 838 UA patients. Of these, we evaluated whether they fulfilled the 1987 or 2010 criteria after 1 year, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were performed with RA as outcome and ACPA, RF, and anti-CarP antibodies as predictors. Analyses were repeated after stratification for ACPA and RF.

RESULTS

Thirty-three percent of the 1987-UA patients and 6% of the 2010-UA patients progressed to RA during the first year of follow-up. For the 1987-UA patients, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with progression to RA, an association which remained when a correction was made for the presence of ACPA and RF (odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.4). After stratification for ACPA and RF, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with progression to RA only for ACPA- and RF-negative patients (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.7). For the 2010-UA patients, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with progression to RA; however, they were not when a correction was made for the presence of ACPA and RF (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding that anti-CarP antibodies have no additional value when RA is defined according to the 2010 criteria might be inherent to the composition of the 2010 criteria and therefore might also apply to other novel autoantibodies. Potentially it would be interesting to evaluate other, non-autoantibody biomarkers.