Single dose pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen, indomethacin, and naproxen taken alone or with sucralfate

Safety of drug use in patients with a primary mitochondrial disease: An international Delphi-based consensus

Clinical guidance is often sought when prescribing drugs for patients with primary mitochondrial disease. Theoretical considerations concerning drug safety in patients with mitochondrial disease may lead to unnecessary withholding of a drug in a situation of clinical need. The aim of this study was to develop consensus on safe medication use in patients with a primary mitochondrial disease. A panel of 16 experts in mitochondrial medicine, pharmacology, and basic science from six different countries was established. A modified Delphi technique was used to allow the panellists to consider draft recommendations anonymously in two Delphi rounds with predetermined levels of agreement. This process was supported by a review of the available literature and a consensus conference that included the panellists and representatives of patient advocacy groups. A high level of consensus was reached regarding the safety of all 46 reviewed drugs, with the knowledge that the risk of adverse events is influenced both by individual patient risk factors and choice of drug or drug class. This paper details the consensus guidelines of an expert panel and provides an important update of previously established guidelines in safe medication use in patients with primary mitochondrial disease. Specific drugs, drug groups, and clinical or genetic conditions are described separately as they require special attention. It is important to emphasise that consensus-based information is useful to provide guidance, but that decisions related to drug prescribing should always be tailored to the specific needs and risks of each individual patient. We aim to present what is current knowledge and plan to update this regularly both to include new drugs and to review those currently included.

The Cardiovascular Pharmacology of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

The principal molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular (CV) and renal adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as myocardial infarction and hypertension, are understood in more detail than most side effects of drugs. Less is known, however, about differences in the CV safety profile between chemically distinct NSAIDs and their relative predisposition to complications. In review article, we discuss how heterogeneity in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of distinct NSAIDs may be expected to affect their CV risk profile. We consider evidence afforded by studies in model systems, mechanistic clinical trials, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, and two recent large clinical trials, Standard Care vs. Celecoxib Outcome Trial (SCOT) and Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen or Naproxen (PRECISION), designed specifically to compare the CV safety of the cyclooxygenase-2-selective NSAID, celecoxib, with traditional NSAIDs. We conclude that SCOT and PRECISION have apparently not compared equipotent doses and have other limitations that bias them toward underestimation of the relative risk of celecoxib.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Drugs Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine

In this review, we evaluate the variability in the pharmacokinetics of 11 drugs with established prophylactic effects in migraine to facilitate 'personalized medicine' with these drugs. PubMed was searched for 'single-dose' and 'steady-state' pharmacokinetic studies of these 11 drugs. The maximum plasma concentration was reported in 248 single-dose and 115 steady-state pharmacokinetic studies, and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was reported in 299 single-dose studies and 112 steady-state pharmacokinetic studies. For each study, the coefficient of variation was calculated for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and we divided the drug variability into two categories; high variability, coefficient of variation >40%, or low or moderate variability, coefficient of variation <40%. Based on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in steady-state studies, the following drugs have high pharmacokinetic variability: propranolol in 92% (33/36), metoprolol in 85% (33/39), and amitriptyline in 60% (3/5) of studies. The following drugs have low or moderate variability: atenolol in 100% (2/2), valproate in 100% (15/15), topiramate in 88% (7/8), and naproxen and candesartan in 100% (2/2) of studies. For drugs with low or moderate pharmacokinetic variability, treatment can start without initial titration of doses, whereas titration is used to possibly enhance tolerability of topiramate and amitriptyline. The very high pharmacokinetic variability of metoprolol and propranolol can result in very high plasma concentrations in a small minority of patients, and those drugs should therefore be titrated up from a low initial dose, depending mainly on the occurrence of adverse events.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of naproxen

Naproxen is a stereochemically pure nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug of the 2-arylpropionic acid class. The absorption of naproxen is rapid and complete when given orally. Naproxen binds extensively, in a concentration-dependent manner, to plasma albumin. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of naproxen is linearly proportional to the dose for oral doses up to a total dose of 500 mg. At doses greater than 500 mg there is an increase in the unbound fraction of drug, leading to an increased renal clearance of total naproxen while unbound renal clearance remains unchanged. Substantial concentrations of the drug are attained in synovial fluid, which is a proposed site of action for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Relationships between the total and unbound plasma concentration, unbound synovial fluid concentration and therapeutic effect have been established. Naproxen is eliminated following biotransformation to glucuroconjugated and sulphate metabolites which are excreted in urine, with only a small amount of the drug being eliminated unchanged. The excretion of the 6-O-desmethylnaproxen metabolite conjugate may be tied to renal function, as accumulation occurs in end-stage renal disease but does not appear to be influenced by age. Hepatic disease and rheumatoid arthritis can also significantly alter the disposition kinetics of naproxen. Although naproxen is excreted into breast milk the amount of drug transferred comprises only a small fraction of the maternal exposure. Significant drug interactions have been demonstrated for probenecid, lithium and methotrexate.

The efficacy of sucralfate suspension in the prevention of oral mucositis due to radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of sucralfate suspension in prevention of oral mucositis and for reduction of oral pain in patients who develop mucositis during radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized prospective trial of a sucralfate suspension in the prevention and management of oral mucositis during radiation therapy. Oral mucositis was assessed using a quantitative scale and symptoms were assessed using visual analogue scales. The statistical model was developed to detect a 40% reduction in mucositis.

RESULTS

No statistically significant reduction in mucositis was seen. Early during radiation therapy less oral pain was reported in the sucralfate group, but as treatment progressed all patients experienced pain. Patients in the sucralfate group were prescribed topical and systemic analgesics later in the course of radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic oral rinsing with sucralfate did not prevent oral ulcerative mucositis. Sucralfate may reduce the experience of pain during radiation therapy.

Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states

Naproxen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) advocated for use in painful and inflammatory rheumatic and certain nonrheumatic conditions. It may be administered orally or rectally using a convenient once or twice daily regimen. Dosage adjustments are not usually required in the elderly or those with mild renal or hepatic impairment although it is probably prudent to start treatment at a low dosage and titrate upwards in such groups of patients. Numerous clinical trials have confirmed that the analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of naproxen is equivalent to that of the many newer and established NSAIDs with which it has been compared. The drug is effective in many rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and nonarticular rheumatism, in acute traumatic injury, and in the treatment of and prophylaxis against acute pain such as migraine, tension headache, postoperative pain, postpartum pain and pain associated with a variety of gynaecological procedures. Naproxen is also effective in treating the pain and associated symptoms of primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea, and decreases excessive blood loss in patients with menorrhagia. The adverse effect profile of naproxen is well established, particularly compared with that of many newer NSAIDs, and the drug is well tolerated. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of naproxen have been clearly established over many years of clinical use, and it can therefore be considered as a first-line treatment for rheumatic diseases and various pain states.

Effect of sucralfate and cimetidine on rheumatoid patients with active gastroduodenal lesions who are taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A pilot study

In a pilot study, 26 rheumatoid arthritic patients taking continuous, stable dosage regimens of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and with developed gastric and duodenal lesions were administered sucralfate 1 g four times per day (14 patients) or cimetidine 400 mg twice daily (12 patients) in a single-blind regimen for six weeks. Eleven of the patients given sucralfate and eight of the patients taking cimetidine had improved lesion scores. The lesion score of 10 of the 14 patients taking sucralfate and four of the 12 patients taking cimetidine improved by 50 percent or better (not significant). The antrum and body of the gastric mucosa and the mucosa of the duodenum synthesized prostanoids and thromboxane A2, and there was no significant difference in the synthesis of individual prostanoids at entry to the trial in the groups assigned to sucralfate or cimetidine. After six weeks of administration of sucralfate, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis by the antrum and body, but not the duodenum, was significantly greater than observed in the biopsy specimens at entry despite continuation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. After six weeks of cimetidine treatment, no change in PGE2 synthesis was noted in any biopsy specimens when compared with the synthesis at entry. No change in the synthesis of PGF2 alpha, 6-oxo-PGF1 alpha, or thromboxane B2 was noted in gastric or duodenal biopsy specimens in any treatment group. Sucralfate and cimetidine administration resulted in improved gastroduodenal lesion scores in rheumatoid arthritic patients continuing with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy.

Effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen in humans

Compliance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy can be compromised by gastrointestinal side effects. To overcome this problem, food, antacid, or sucralfate are often co-administered with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Three studies were conducted on three groups of 12 volunteers in order to determine the influence of food or sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen. In a crossover experimental design, the first group received a single dose (50 mg) of ketoprofen with and without sucralfate (2 g). The second group received single (100 mg) and multiple (100 mg twice daily for 5 days) doses of enteric-coated ketoprofen with and without food. The third group received single (500 mg) and multiple (500 mg twice daily) doses of naproxen with and without sucralfate. Multiple blood samples were drawn and analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Short- and long-term pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Results in group 1 showed that neither ketoprofen bioavailability nor maximal plasma concentration and time to reach maximal concentration were affected by the administration of sucralfate. However, in group 2 absorption of ketoprofen was markedly affected by food. In the presence of food, maximal plasma concentration decreased from 10.7 to 6.3 micrograms/ml after single-dose administration and 12.1 to 8.0 micrograms/ml after multiple-dose administration. The time to reach maximal plasma concentration was also modified by food, increasing from 2.8 to 7.1 hours after single-dose and 2.8 to 7.6 hours after multiple-dose administration. Food caused a significant decrease in the bioavailability of ketoprofen (over 40 percent) following both single-dose (23.8 versus 13.1 micrograms.hour/ml) and multiple-dose (29.3 versus 16.8 micrograms.hour/ml) administration. Results obtained in group 3 showed that sucralfate reduced the absorption rate constant of naproxen, from 1.7 to 1.2 hours-1 and from 1.5 to 0.7 hour-1 following single- and multiple-dose administration, respectively. However, bioavailability of naproxen was not affected by sucralfate administration. Overall, these studies have shown that sucralfate does not alter the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen; the amount of drug absorbed remains constant. However, plasma concentrations of ketoprofen after single- and multiple-dose administration were greatly affected by food, with a decrease of greater than 40 percent in bioavailability.

Effects of concurrent sucralfate administration on pharmacokinetics of naproxen

Sucralfate has been reported to protect the gastroduodenal mucosa against a variety of agents and is known to adsorb bile salts. Since gastrointestinal side effects can seriously compromise the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy, and since it seems reasonable to assume that sucralfate may adsorb nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the influence of sucralfate on the pharmacokinetic parameters of naproxen was assessed in 12 healthy volunteers. To do so, the pharmacokinetic profile of naproxen, administered alone or with sucralfate, singly or repeatedly (twice daily for five days), was compared. No significant difference was observed with any pharmacokinetic parameter between the single administration of naproxen alone or with sucralfate. However, a significantly lower maximum plasma concentration was attained with the repeated administration of naproxen in combination with sucralfate, compared with the repeated administration of naproxen alone. When single- and multiple-dose administration were compared, significant differences were observed in the maximum plasma concentration and the cumulative area under the curve. These results suggest an accumulation of naproxen after five days' administration. This accumulation, however, is not altered by the administration of sucralfate. The results of this study suggest that when naproxen is administered with sucralfate, only a delay in naproxen's absorption may occur, confirmed by a lower maximum plasma concentration, a longer time to reach the maximum plasma concentration, a similar elimination half-life, and equivalence in bioavailability. The clinical importance of such a delay has yet to be proved; however, it is unlikely that the clinical efficacy of naproxen will be altered, since the amount of drug absorbed remains the same.