Recurrent Noncoding Mutations in Skin Cancers: UV Damage Susceptibility or Repair Inhibition as Primary Driver?

Deciphering the dynamic code: DNA recognition by transcription factors in the ever-changing genome

Transcription factors (TFs) intricately navigate the vast genomic landscape to locate and bind specific DNA sequences for the regulation of gene expression programs. These interactions occur within a dynamic cellular environment, where both DNA and TF proteins experience continual chemical and structural perturbations, including epigenetic modifications, DNA damage, mechanical stress, and post-translational modifications (PTMs). While many of these factors impact TF-DNA binding interactions, understanding their effects remains challenging and incomplete. This review explores the existing literature on these dynamic changes and their potential impact on TF-DNA interactions.

Genome-wide impact of cytosine methylation and DNA sequence context on UV-induced CPD formation

Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light is the primary etiological agent for skin cancers because UV damages cellular DNA. The most frequent form of UV damage is the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD), which consists of covalent linkages between neighboring pyrimidine bases in DNA. In human cells, the 5' position of cytosine bases in CG dinucleotides is frequently methylated, and methylated cytosines in the TP53 tumor suppressor are often sites of mutation hotspots in skin cancers. It has been argued that this is because cytosine methylation promotes UV-induced CPD formation; however, the effects of cytosine methylation on CPD formation are controversial, with conflicting results from previous studies. Here, we use a genome-wide method known as CPD-seq to map UVB- and UVC-induced CPDs across the yeast genome in the presence or absence in vitro methylation by the CpG methyltransferase M.SssI. Our data indicate that cytosine methylation increases UVB-induced CPD formation nearly 2-fold relative to unmethylated DNA, but the magnitude of induction depends on the flanking sequence context. Sequence contexts with a 5' guanine base (e.g., GCCG and GTCG) show the strongest induction due to cytosine methylation, potentially because these sequence contexts are less efficient at forming CPD lesions in the absence of methylation. We show that cytosine methylation also modulates UVC-induced CPD formation, albeit to a lesser extent than UVB. These findings can potentially reconcile previous studies, and define the impact of cytosine methylation on UV damage across a eukaryotic genome.

Detecting recurrent passenger mutations in melanoma by targeted UV damage sequencing

Sequencing of melanomas has identified hundreds of recurrent mutations in both coding and non-coding DNA. These include a number of well-characterized oncogenic driver mutations, such as coding mutations in the BRAF and NRAS oncogenes, and non-coding mutations in the promoter of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). However, the molecular etiology and significance of most of these mutations is unknown. Here, we use a new method known as CPD-capture-seq to map UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) with high sequencing depth and single nucleotide resolution at sites of recurrent mutations in melanoma. Our data reveal that many previously identified drivers and other recurrent mutations in melanoma occur at CPD hotspots in UV-irradiated melanocytes, often associated with an overlapping binding site of an E26 transformation-specific (ETS) transcription factor. In contrast, recurrent mutations in the promoters of a number of known or suspected cancer genes are not associated with elevated CPD levels. Our data indicate that a subset of recurrent protein-coding mutations are also likely caused by ETS-induced CPD hotspots. This analysis indicates that ETS proteins profoundly shape the mutation landscape of melanoma and reveals a method for distinguishing potential driver mutations from passenger mutations whose recurrence is due to elevated UV damage.

Genome-wide maps of rare and atypical UV photoproducts reveal distinct patterns of damage formation and mutagenesis in yeast chromatin

Ultraviolet (UV) light induces different classes of mutagenic photoproducts in DNA, namely cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PPs), and atypical thymine-adenine photoproducts (TA-PPs). CPD formation is modulated by nucleosomes and transcription factors (TFs), which has important ramifications for Ultraviolet (UV) mutagenesis. How chromatin affects the formation of 6-4PPs and TA-PPs is unclear. Here, we use UV damage endonuclease-sequencing (UVDE-seq) to map these UV photoproducts across the yeast genome. Our results indicate that nucleosomes, the fundamental building block of chromatin, have opposing effects on photoproduct formation. Nucleosomes induce CPDs and 6-4PPs at outward rotational settings in nucleosomal DNA but suppress TA-PPs at these settings. Our data also indicate that DNA binding by different classes of yeast TFs causes lesion-specific hotspots of 6-4PPs or TA-PPs. For example, DNA binding by the TF Rap1 generally suppresses CPD and 6-4PP formation but induces a TA-PP hotspot. Finally, we show that 6-4PP formation is strongly induced at the binding sites of TATA-binding protein (TBP), which is correlated with higher mutation rates in UV-exposed yeast. These results indicate that the formation of 6-4PPs and TA-PPs is modulated by chromatin differently than CPDs and that this may have important implications for UV mutagenesis.

Widespread perturbation of ETS factor binding sites in cancer

Although >90% of somatic mutations reside in non-coding regions, few have been reported as cancer drivers. To predict driver non-coding variants (NCVs), we present a transcription factor (TF)-aware burden test based on a model of coherent TF function in promoters. We apply this test to NCVs from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes cohort and predict 2555 driver NCVs in the promoters of 813 genes across 20 cancer types. These genes are enriched in cancer-related gene ontologies, essential genes, and genes associated with cancer prognosis. We find that 765 candidate driver NCVs alter transcriptional activity, 510 lead to differential binding of TF-cofactor regulatory complexes, and that they primarily impact the binding of ETS factors. Finally, we show that different NCVs within a promoter often affect transcriptional activity through shared mechanisms. Our integrated computational and experimental approach shows that cancer NCVs are widespread and that ETS factors are commonly disrupted.

Molecular mechanism of UV damage modulation in nucleosomes

Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light causes the formation of mutagenic cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) in cellular DNA. Previous studies have revealed that CPD formation in nucleosomes, the building blocks of chromatin, shows a striking ∼10 base pair (bp) periodic pattern. CPD formation is suppressed at positions where the DNA minor groove faces toward the histone octamer (minor-in) and elevated CPD formation at positions where the minor groove faces away from the histone octamer (minor-out). However, the molecular mechanism underlying this nucleosome photofootprint is unclear. Here, we analyzed ∼180 high-resolution nucleosome structures to characterize whether differences in DNA mobility or conformation are responsible for the CPD modulation in nucleosomes. Our results indicate that differences in DNA mobility cannot explain CPD modulation in nucleosome. Instead, we find that the sharp DNA bending around the histone octamer results in DNA conformations with structural parameters more susceptible to UV damage formation at minor-out positions and more resistant to CPD formation at minor-in positions. This analysis reveals the molecular mechanism responsible for periodic modulation of CPD formation and UV mutagenesis in nucleosomal DNA.

CTCF binding modulates UV damage formation to promote mutation hot spots in melanoma

Somatic mutations in DNA-binding sites for CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) are significantly elevated in many cancers. Prior analysis has suggested that elevated mutation rates at CTCF-binding sites in skin cancers are a consequence of the CTCF-cohesin complex inhibiting repair of UV damage. Here, we show that CTCF binding modulates the formation of UV damage to induce mutation hot spots. Analysis of genome-wide CPD-seq data in UV-irradiated human cells indicates that formation of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) is primarily suppressed by CTCF binding but elevated at specific locations within the CTCF motif. Locations of CPD hot spots in the CTCF-binding motif coincide with mutation hot spots in melanoma. A similar pattern of damage formation is observed at CTCF-binding sites in vitro, indicating that UV damage modulation is a direct consequence of CTCF binding. We show that CTCF interacts with binding sites containing UV damage and inhibits repair by a model repair enzyme in vitro. Structural analysis and molecular dynamic simulations reveal the molecular mechanism for how CTCF binding modulates CPD formation.

Super hotspots and super coldspots in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage in the human genome

The formation of UV-induced DNA damage and its repair are influenced by many factors that modulate lesion formation and the accessibility of repair machinery. However, it remains unknown which genomic sites are prioritized for immediate repair after UV damage induction, and whether these prioritized sites overlap with hotspots of UV damage. We identified the super hotspots subject to the earliest repair for (6-4) pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproduct by using the eXcision Repair-sequencing (XR-seq) method. We further identified super coldspots for (6-4) pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproduct repair and super hotspots for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer repair by analyzing available XR-seq time-course data. By integrating datasets of XR-seq, Damage-seq, adductSeq, and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer-seq, we show that neither repair super hotspots nor repair super coldspots overlap hotspots of UV damage. Furthermore, we demonstrate that repair super hotspots are significantly enriched in frequently interacting regions and superenhancers. Finally, we report our discovery of an enrichment of cytosine in repair super hotspots and super coldspots. These findings suggest that local DNA features together with large-scale chromatin features contribute to the orders of magnitude variability in the rates of UV damage repair.

Asymmetric repair of UV damage in nucleosomes imposes a DNA strand polarity on somatic mutations in skin cancer

Nucleosomes inhibit excision repair of DNA damage caused by ultraviolet (UV) light, and it has been generally assumed that repair inhibition is equivalent on both sides of the nucleosome dyad. Here, we use genome-wide repair data to show that repair of UV damage in nucleosomes is asymmetric. In yeast, nucleosomes inhibit nucleotide excision repair (NER) of the nontranscribed strand (NTS) of genes in an asymmetric manner, with faster repair of UV damage occurring on the 5′ side of the nucleosomal DNA. Analysis of genomic repair data from UV-irradiated human cells indicates that NER activity along the NTS is also elevated on the 5′ side of nucleosomes, consistent with the repair asymmetry observed in yeast nucleosomes. Among intergenic nucleosomes, repair activity is elevated on the 5′ side of both DNA strands. The distribution of somatic mutations in nucleosomes shows the opposite asymmetry in NER-proficient skin cancers, but not in NER-deficient cancers, indicating that asymmetric repair of nucleosomal DNA imposes a strand polarity on UV mutagenesis. Somatic mutations are enriched on the relatively slow-repairing 3′ side of the nucleosomal DNA, particularly at positions where the DNA minor groove faces away from the histone octamer. Asymmetric repair and mutagenesis are likely caused by differential accessibility of the nucleosomal DNA, a consequence of its left-handed wrapping around the histone octamer.

Genomic sites hypersensitive to ultraviolet radiation

If the genome contains outlier sequences extraordinarily sensitive to environmental agents, these would be sentinels for monitoring personal carcinogen exposure and might drive direct changes in cell physiology rather than acting through rare mutations. New methods, adductSeq and freqSeq, provided statistical resolution to quantify rare lesions at single-base resolution across the genome. Primary human melanocytes, but not fibroblasts, carried spontaneous apurinic sites and TG sequence lesions more frequent than ultraviolet (UV)-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). UV exposure revealed hyperhotspots acquiring CPDs up to 170-fold more frequently than the genomic average; these sites were more prevalent in melanocytes. Hyperhotspots were disproportionately located near genes, particularly for RNA-binding proteins, with the most-recurrent hyperhotspots at a fixed position within 2 motifs. One motif occurs at ETS family transcription factor binding sites, known to be UV targets and now shown to be among the most sensitive in the genome, and at sites of mTOR/5' terminal oligopyrimidine-tract translation regulation. The second occurs at A2-15TTCTY, which developed "dark CPDs" long after UV exposure, repaired CPDs slowly, and had accumulated CPDs prior to the experiment. Motif locations active as hyperhotspots differed between cell types. Melanocyte CPD hyperhotspots aligned precisely with recurrent UV signature mutations in individual gene promoters of melanomas and with known cancer drivers. At sunburn levels of UV exposure, every cell would have a hyperhotspot CPD in each of the ∼20 targeted cell pathways, letting hyperhotspots act as epigenetic marks that create phenome instability; high prevalence favors cooccurring mutations, which would allow tumor evolution to use weak drivers.