Structural insight into the role of the second intracellular loop of the bradykinin 2 receptor in signaling and internalization

C-terminus of ETA/ETB receptors regulate endothelin-1 signal transmission

The dimerization of the G protein-coupled receptors for endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelin A receptor (ETA) and endolethin B receptor (ETB), is well established. However, the signaling consequences of the homodimerization and heterodimerization of ETA and ETB is not well understood. Here, we demonstrate that peptides derived from the C-termini of these receptors regulate the signaling capacity of ET-1. The C-termini of the ETA and ETB receptors are believed to consist of three α-helices, which may serve as points of interaction between the receptors. The third α-helix in the C-terminus is of particular interest because of its amphipathic nature. In a cell line expressing only the ETA receptor, expression of residues Y430-S442, representing the third helix of the ETB C-terminus, leads to a dramatic increase in the signaling induced by ET-1. In contrast, in a cell line containing only ETB , Y430-S442 has an antagonistic effect, slightly reducing the ET-1 induced signal. Computational docking results suggest that the α-helical ETB -derived peptide binds to the second and third intracellular loops of the ETA receptor consistent with the alteration of its signaling capacity. Our results described here provide important insight into ETA /ETB receptor interactions and possibly a new approach to regulate specific G protein-coupled receptor signal transmission.

Unraveling the structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors through NMR spectroscopy

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large superfamily of signaling proteins expressed on the plasma membrane. They are involved in a wide range of physiological processes and, therefore, are exploited as drug targets in a multitude of therapeutic areas. In this extent, knowledge of structural and functional properties of GPCRs may greatly facilitate rational design of modulator compounds. Solution and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy represents a powerful method to gather atomistic insights into protein structure and dynamics. In spite of the difficulties inherent the solution of the structure of membrane proteins through NMR, these methods have been successfully applied, sometimes in combination with molecular modeling, to the determination of the structure of GPCR fragments, the mapping of receptor-ligand interactions, and the study of the conformational changes associated with the activation of the receptors. In this review, we provide a summary of the NMR contributions to the study of the structure and function of GPCRs, also in light of the published crystal structures.

G-protein coupled receptor structure

Because of their central role in regulation of cellular function, structure/function relationships for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are of vital importance, yet only recently have sufficient data been obtained to begin mapping those relationships. GPCRs regulate a wide range of cellular processes, including the senses of taste, smell, and vision, and control a myriad of intracellular signaling systems in response to external stimuli. Many diseases are linked to GPCRs. A critical need exists for structural information to inform studies on mechanism of receptor action and regulation. X-ray crystal structures of only one GPCR, in an inactive state, have been obtained to date. However considerable structural information for a variety of GPCRs has been obtained using non-crystallographic approaches. This review begins with a review of the very earliest GPCR structural information, mostly derived from rhodopsin. Because of the difficulty in crystallizing GPCRs for X-ray crystallography, the extensive published work utilizing alternative approaches to GPCR structure is reviewed, including determination of three-dimensional structure from sparse constraints. The available X-ray crystallographic analyses on bovine rhodopsin are reviewed as the only available high-resolution structures for any GPCR. Structural information available on ligand binding to several receptors is included. The limited information on excited states of receptors is also reviewed. It is concluded that while considerable basic structural information has been obtained, more data are needed to describe the molecular mechanism of activation of a GPCR.

Criteria for the design and biological characterization of radiolabeled peptide-based pharmaceuticals

Radiolabeled peptide-based formulations are being evaluated for their application in oncological imaging and therapy using nuclear medicine techniques. A major breakthrough in the field was the discovery and identification of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily that are overexpressed in a variety of human cancers. These receptors act as targets for endogenous compounds, often of peptidic nature, which can be radiolabeled and, therefore, could potentially be utilized as radiopharmaceuticals. This general strategy has proven successful for application in humans in only a few cases thus far. However, the use of more sophisticated structural methodology to enhance our understanding of the interactions between the receptor and the endogenous peptide or its analogs, and a more efficient preclinical evaluation process, may help to single out the most promising compounds for further development and eventual use in the clinical application of radiopharmaceuticals. This review analyzes current methods of approaching these key points. The rational process for developing peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals is presented, from the structural analysis of the peptide-receptor interaction for the identification and modeling of the peptide analogs to the synthesis, with an appropriate metal carrier, of compounds that mimic endogenous peptides. Finally, the in vitro and in vivo biological testing and evaluation in preclinical animal models is described. To render the entire process successful, expertise in different areas of drug development is indispensable.

Bradykinin B2 receptor signaling: Structural and functional characterization of the C-terminus

Over the last few years the importance of the intracellular C-terminus in the signaling of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) has become increasingly evident. In an effort to provide a structural framework for biological function, we have determined the conformation of the C-terminus of the bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor. Using a uniformly 15N- and 13C-enriched sample of the BKB2 receptor [309-366], NMR results clearly define three alpha-helices lying on the zwitterionic surface of the dodecylphosphocholine. The proximal helix consisting of residues 311-326 was previously predicted based on homology modeling with rhodopsin. This corresponds to what is often called helix-8 of the GPCRs. The two distal helices, residues 333-345 and 348-363, are clearly borne out by the NMR data. The functional importance of these secondary structural elements was probed by determination of the signaling properties (inositol phosphate formation) of mutant BKB2 receptors lacking the domains (deletion mutants) or containing the corresponding region from the related GPCR, angiotensin II AT1a (chimera receptors). We demonstrate that the regions between the helices (residues 327-333 and 346-347) can be exchanged without loss of signaling. In contrast, modification of the three helices, particularly the hydroxyl-containing residues, has drastic effects on the signaling profile of the BKB2 receptor. By coupling of the structural features with the functional data, the molecular mechanisms of signaling by the BKB2 receptor are beginning to be established.

Receptor fragment approach to the binding between CCK8 peptide and cholecystokinin receptors: A fluorescence study on type B receptor fragment CCKB-R (352-379)

Fluorescence titrations in a membrane mimetic solvent system allowed us to estimate that the dissociation constant of the bimolecular complex between CCK8 peptide and cholecystokinin type B receptor fragment CCK(B)-R (352-379) is in the micromolar range. When considered in the context of the full receptor/ligand model, these experiments demonstrate that the receptor fragment chosen on the basis of previous structural studies represents a reliable model system to monitor the ability of CCK8 or CCK8 analogs to bind the cholecystokinin receptor. Together with previous studies, this confirms that the receptor fragment approach adopted to define the binding mode of the CCK8 fragment of cholecystokinin with its two receptors, CCK(A) and CCK(B,) can be used to characterize the binding from the equilibrium standpoint. In this context, fluorescence spectroscopy proves to be the favored technique to measure dissociation constants in the nanomolar to micromolar range.

K317, R319, and E320 within the proximal C-terminus of the bradykinin B2 receptor form a motif important for phospholipase C and phospholipase A2 but not connective tissue growth factor related signaling

We showed previously that large domain exchanges between the bradykinin B2 (BKB2) and angiotensin II type 1a (AT1a) receptors can result in functional hybrids. However, when we proceeded to exchange the entire bradykinin B2 receptor (BKB2R) C-terminal tail with the AT1aR C-terminus, the hybrid, while continuing to bind BK and be endocytosed as wild type (WT) BKB2R, lost much of its ability to activate phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover or the release of arachidonic acid (ARA). In this study, we constructed chimeric receptors within the proximal C-terminus between the BKB2R and AT1aR or bradykinin B1 receptor (BKB1R). The mutant and WT receptor cDNAs were stably transfected into Rat-1 cells. Also, point mutations were generated to evaluate the role of the individual residues within this region. These chimeric studies revealed that the proximal portion of the BKB2R C-tail is crucial for G protein-linked BKB2R functions. This region could not be swapped with the AT1aR to obtain a BK activated PI turnover or ARA release. Further studies demonstrated that the distal portion (325-330) of this region is exchangeable; however, the middle portion (317-324) is not. Small motif exchanges within this section identified the KSR and EVY motifs as crucial for G(alphaq), G(alphai) related signaling of the BKB2R. Point mutations then showed that the charged amino acids K317, R319, and E320 are the residues critical for linking to PI turnover and ARA release. However, these proximal chimeras showed normal receptor uptake. Interestingly, while apparently not activating G protein-linked signaling, the proximal tail AT1aR exchange mutant and the entire C-terminus exchange hybrid continued to cause a substantial bradykinin effected increase in connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) mRNA level, as WT BKB2R.

Chimeric exchanges within the bradykinin B2 receptor intracellular face with the prostaglandin EP2 receptor as the donor: importance of the second intracellular loop for cAMP synthesis

The prostaglandin E2 (PGE(2)) EP2 receptor (EP2R) type is G protein coupled (GPCR) and links to Galphas. Through this receptor PGE(2) activates cAMP production. The bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor (BKB2R) is also a GPCR but links to Galphaq and Galphai and does not activate cAMP production in response to bradykinin. In an attempt to convert the BKB2R into a Galphas-linked adenylate cyclase-activating receptor we proceeded to make global and discrete motif replacements of the intracellular (IC) face of the BKB2R with the corresponding regions of the human EP2R. With this approach we produced hybrid receptors which, when stably transfected into wild type (WT) Rat-1 cells, bound BK but produced cAMP. Replacement of the second loop (IC2), third loop (IC3), the entire C terminus, and the distal C terminus resulted in receptors which bound BK. However, only the IC2 and IC3 exchanges resulted in cAMP-producing receptors. Of these two regions, the IC2 exchange was by far the better cAMP-generating receptor, producing cAMP at approximately 6.6-fold above WT BKB2R or approximately one fourth the amount produced by WT EP2R-transfected Rat-1 cells. Both human and rat EP2R and human beta2-adrenergic receptor exchanges of the IC2 produced equal quantities of cAMP. Focusing on the rBKB2R/hEP2R IC2 chimeras, the region consisting of residues 136-147 (BKB2R residue numbering) proved to contain a cAMP-generating motif. Within this region, the proximal six amino acids from the EP2R (HPYFYQ) at position 136-141 proved crucial for cAMP production (10-fold over WT BKB2R). The distal part of this region, the six residues at 142-147, played no role in cAMP production. On the other hand, the ALV motif of the BKB2R IC2, residues 133-135, proved important with respect to phosphatydilinositol (PI) turnover. Replacing the entire IC2 of BKB2R resulted in poor PI turnover, while including the AVL of BKB2R retained approximately half of the WT PI turnover. With respect to receptor uptake, all the IC2 mutants endocytosed as WT BKB2R (60% in 1h). However, the exchange of the distal and the whole C termini resulted in a marked drop in endocytosis (30% in 1h). These results demonstrate that the construction of a cAMP-producing BKB2/EP2 receptor hybrid is possible, with the IC2 region distal to DRYLALV proving important to Galphas linkage and the LALV motif within the IC2 of BKB2R and the region proximal to it proving important for Galphaq and Galphai linkage. Additionally, our results confirm the importance of the distal C terminus in determining receptor uptake.

Determination of ligand-receptor interactions of cholecystokinin by nuclear magnetic resonance

To date high resolution structural studies of G protein coupled receptors, with the exception of rhodopsin, have not been feasible using conventional spectroscopic techniques. To overcome these difficulties, the structural features of partial or intact domains of GPCRs have been studied by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Here, we describe the structural characterization of receptor domains from the cholecystokinin 1 and 2 receptors and the elucidation of intermolecular interactions between the extracellular receptor domains and CCK-8 by solution state nmr.

The crystallographic model of rhodopsin and its use in studies of other G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins that respond to environmental signals and initiate signal transduction pathways activating cellular processes. Rhodopsin is a GPCR found in rod cells in retina where it functions as a photopigment. Its molecular structure is known from cryo-electron microscopic and X-ray crystallographic studies, and this has reshaped many structure/function questions important in vision science. In addition, this first GPCR structure has provided a structural template for studies of other GPCRs, including many known drug targets. After presenting an overview of the major structural elements of rhodopsin, recent literature covering the use of the rhodopsin structure in analyzing other GPCRs will be summarized. Use of the rhodopsin structural model to understand the structure and function of other GPCRs provides strong evidence validating the structural model.

Hybrid formation between the intracellular faces of the bradykinin B2 and angiotensin II AT1 receptors and signal transduction

Most frequently, the physiologic functions of the angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor (AT1R) and bradykinin B2 receptor (BKB2R) are antagonistic, particularly with respect to the regulation of vascular tone. Despite major differences in their physiologic actions, the receptors share sequence similarities. Both link to Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) and transduce very similar signal paths, not only those relating to the traditional G-protein associated second messengers, but also those involved in transactivation mechanisms involving receptor tyrosine kinases. With respect to these paths, some differences in signaling may be accounted for by cell type specificity. However, alternative signal cascades for these two receptors are becoming increasingly evident. One such is the recruitment of signaling molecules upon receptor translocation and internalization. The AT1R translocates into clathrin-coated pits and internalizes upon recruitment of beta-arrestin 2 which then recruits ASK1 and JNK3. The BKB2R translocates and internalizes mainly via caveolae. Another signaling divergence may be due to the direct activation of small G-proteins by both receptors. AT1R activates the RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42 while BKB2R couples only with Rac1 and Cdc42. Both receptors may serve as docking stations for intracellular proteins. One such example is the YIPP motif within the C-terminus of the ATIR which associates with the JAK/STAT pathway. Another potential alternative is the activation of tyrosine/serine kinase phosphatases by BK. This mechanism may directly oppose some of the protein tyrosine/ serine kinase paths activated by AT1R. These alternative mechanisms in sum are potentially responsible for the diversion in signal transduction between these two receptors. Regardless of the route of action, our results suggest that in Rat-1 fibroblasts stably transfected with BKB2R, BK slightly decreases connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) mRNA level while in ATIR transfected cells Ang II increases CTGF mRNA markedly. To determine whether mutant hybrids can be formed between these two receptors which encompass some of the function of the donor receptor but bind the ligand of the recipient receptor, a series of hybrids were formed with BKB2R the recipient and AT1R the donor receptor. Some of these hybrids show resistance to exchanges with the AT1R and form receptors which either do not bind (IC1 exchanges) or demonstrate poor function but normal internalization (proximal C-terminus exchanges). However, other hybrids have proven very functional. For example, the IC2, IC3 and distal C-terminus of the BKB2R IC face can be replaced simultaneously with the AT1R resulting in an hybrid which binds BK, continues to signal, is internalized and resensitized. Formation of this and other less extensive hybrids is discussed. Some of these hybrids possess the capacity to function as the AT1R as exemplified by their ability to upregulate CTGF expression as wild-type (WT) AT1R.

Mechanisms regulating the expression, self-maintenance, and signaling-function of the bradykinin B2 and B1 receptors

Bradykinin (BK) is a potent short-lived effector belonging to a class of peptides known as kinins. It participates in inflammatory and vascular regulation and processes including angioedema, tissue permeability, vascular dilation, and smooth muscle contraction. BK exerts its biological effects through the activation of the bradykinin B2 receptor (BKB2R) which is G-protein-coupled and is generally constitutively expressed. Upon binding, the receptor is activated and transduces signal cascades which have become paradigms for the actions of the Galphai and Galphaq G-protein subunits. Following activation the receptor is then desensitized, endocytosed, and resensitized. The bradykinin B1 (BKB1R) is a closely related receptor. It is activated by desArg(10)-kallidin or desArg(9)-BK, metabolites of kallidin and BK, respectively. This receptor is induced following tissue injury or after treatment with bacterial endotoxins such as lipopolysacharide or cytokines such as interleukin-1 or tumor necrosis factor-alpha. In this review we will summarize the BKB2R and BKB1R mediated signal transduction pathways. We will then emphasize the relevance of key residues and domains of the intracellular regions of the BKB2R as they relate to modulating its function (signal transduction) and self-maintenance (desensitization, endocytosis, and resensitization). We will examine the features of the BKB1R gene promoter and its mRNA as these operate in the expression and self-maintenance of this inducible receptor. This communication will not cover areas discussed in earlier reviews pertaining to the actions of peptide analogs. For these we refer you to earlier reviews (Regoli and Barabé, 1980, Pharmacol Rev 32:1-46; Regoli et al., 1990, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 15(Suppl 6):S30-S38; Regoli et al., 1993, Can J Physiol Pharmacol 71:556-557; Marceau, 1995, Immunopharmacology 30:1-26; Regoli et al., 1998, Eur J Pharmacol 348:1-10).