1
|
Liu J, Chen C, Chen H, Xiang A, Zheng R, Hu S, Guo J, Qu L, Zhou J, Wu J. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 93:22-29. [PMID: 38885161 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on breast cancer patients with stage II-III disease who performed implant-based breast reconstruction following with PMRT between September 2016 and April 2022. The patients were categorized into two matched groups: (1) patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) or (2) subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) followed by PMRT. Following reconstruction, the patients were further compared for PMRT with the tissue expander (PMRT-TE) versus PMRT with permanent implant (PMRT-PI). PROs were measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Early and late complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 55 eligible patients were recruited. Patients who underwent PBR reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts scores (P = 0.003) compared with the SBR group. The PMRT-TE group had higher satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) but lower physical well-being (P = 0.029) scores compared with PMRT-PI group. Moreover, patients in SBR cohort had a higher risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) (20.5% vs 6.3%) and implant dislocation (48.7% vs 12.5%) than patients in PBR cohort. Patients in PMRT-PI group had a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) than PMRT-TE group (20.8% vs 12.9%). CONCLUSIONS PBR was associated with lower rates of late complications, especially for implant dislocation, and higher satisfaction with breasts scores compared to SBR. In addition, compared to PMRT-TE with PMRT-PI, patients in PMRT-TE cohort reported superior PROs of satisfaction with breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Liu
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Cong Chen
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Honggang Chen
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Aizhai Xiang
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Ruzhen Zheng
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Shufang Hu
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Jufeng Guo
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Li Qu
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Jun Zhou
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park JB, Jang BS, Chang JH, Kim JH, Choi CH, Hong KY, Jin US, Chang H, Myung Y, Jeong JH, Heo CY, Kim IA, Shin KH. The impact of the new ESTRO-ACROP target volume delineation guidelines for postmastectomy radiotherapy after implant-based breast reconstruction on breast complications. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1373434. [PMID: 38846971 PMCID: PMC11153655 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1373434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) updated a new target volume delineation guideline for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on breast complications with the new guideline compared to the conventional guidelines. In total, 308 patients who underwent PMRT after tissue expander or permanent implant insertion from 2016 to 2021 were included; 184 received PMRT by the new ESTRO-ACROP target delineation (ESTRO-T), and 124 by conventional target delineation (CONV-T). The endpoints were major breast complications (infection, necrosis, dehiscence, capsular contracture, animation deformity, and rupture) requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization and any grade ≥2 breast complications. With a median follow-up of 36.4 months, the cumulative incidence rates of major breast complications at 1, 2, and 3 years were 6.6%, 10.3%, and 12.6% in the ESTRO-T group, and 9.7%, 15.4%, and 16.3% in the CONV-T group; it did not show a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.56). In multivariable analyses, target delineation is not associated with the major complications (sHR = 0.87; p = 0.77). There was no significant difference in any breast complications (3-year incidence, 18.9% vs. 23.3%, respectively; p = 0.56). Symptomatic RT-induced pneumonitis was developed in six (3.2%) and three (2.4%) patients, respectively. One local recurrence occurred in the ESTRO-T group, which was within the ESTRO-target volume. The new ESTRO-ACROP target volume guideline did not demonstrate significant differences in major or any breast complications, although it showed a tendency of reduced complication risks. As the dosimetric benefits of normal organs and comparable oncologic outcomes have been reported, further analyses with long-term follow-up are necessary to evaluate whether it could be connected to better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Bin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bum-Sup Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Young Hong
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ung Sik Jin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hak Chang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yujin Myung
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Jeong
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Yeong Heo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang H, Song D, Xie L, Zhan N, Xie W, Zhang J. Postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: Current controversies and trends. CANCER INNOVATION 2024; 3:e104. [PMID: 38948530 PMCID: PMC11212305 DOI: 10.1002/cai2.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is an essential component of combined therapy for early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. Breast reconstruction (BR) is often considered for patients with breast cancer who have undergone mastectomy. There has been a considerable amount of discussion about the optimal approach to combining PMRT with BR in the treatment of breast cancer. PMRT may increase the risk of complications and prevent good aesthetic results after BR, while BR may increase the complexity of PMRT and the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues. The purpose of this review is to give a broad overview and summary of the current controversies and trends in PMRT and BR in the context of the most recent literature available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Dandan Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Liangxi Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Ning Zhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Wenjia Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Jianming Zhang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Identification and Control of Complex Dynamic System, Quanzhou Institute of Equipment Manufacturing, Haixi InstitutesChinese Academy of SciencesQuanzhouFujianChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hou PY, Hsieh CH, Hsu CX, Kuo DY, Lu YF, Shueng PW. Impact of Varying Chest Wall Target Volume Delineation on Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Implant-Based Reconstruction. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6882. [PMID: 37959348 PMCID: PMC10650648 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The target volume for post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients with reconstruction has been a subject of debate. Traditionally, the RT chest wall (CW) volume encompasses the entire implant. For patients with retropectoral implants, the deep lymphatic plexus dorsal part of the implant is no longer considered high risk and can be omitted. This study aimed to assess the radiation dose distribution and treatment outcomes associated with different CW delineation according to ESTRO ACROP guideline for patients who have undergone implant-based reconstruction. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent a mastectomy followed by two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) between 2007 and 2022. The expanders/implants were positioned retropectorally. The chest wall target volumes were categorized into two groups: the prepectoral group, which excluded the deep lymphatic plexus, and the whole expander group. RESULTS The study included 26 patients, with 15 in the prepectoral group and 11 in the whole expander group. No significant differences were observed in normal organ exposure between the two groups. There was a trend toward a lower ipsilateral lung mean dose in the prepectoral group (10.2 vs. 11.1 Gy, p = 0.06). Both groups exhibited limited instances of reconstruction failure and local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS For patients undergoing two-stage expander/implant retropectoral breast reconstruction and PMRT, our data provided comparable outcomes and normal organ exposure for those omitting the deep lymphatic plexus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Yu Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan; (P.-Y.H.); (C.-H.H.); (C.-X.H.); (D.-Y.K.); (Y.-F.L.)
- School of Nursing, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Hsi Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan; (P.-Y.H.); (C.-H.H.); (C.-X.H.); (D.-Y.K.); (Y.-F.L.)
- School of Nursing, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Xiong Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan; (P.-Y.H.); (C.-H.H.); (C.-X.H.); (D.-Y.K.); (Y.-F.L.)
| | - Deng-Yu Kuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan; (P.-Y.H.); (C.-H.H.); (C.-X.H.); (D.-Y.K.); (Y.-F.L.)
| | - Yueh-Feng Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan; (P.-Y.H.); (C.-H.H.); (C.-X.H.); (D.-Y.K.); (Y.-F.L.)
| | - Pei-Wei Shueng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei 220216, Taiwan; (P.-Y.H.); (C.-H.H.); (C.-X.H.); (D.-Y.K.); (Y.-F.L.)
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Polotto S, Pedrazzi G, Bergamini M, D'Abbiero N, Cattelani L. ADM-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Setting: Long-Term Results. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:704-711. [PMID: 37479666 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on immediate breast reconstruction historically involved a marked increase in complication rate (up to 50%). Prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) has shown promising early postoperative results. This study aims to evaluate PPBR long-term results in PMRT setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective monocentric analysis of 485 PPBR (439 patients) undergoing Acellular-Dermal-Matrix assisted direct-to-implant reconstruction (46 bilateral procedures) between January 2015 and December 2020 (mean FU:35.6 months). Group 1 comprised 401 PPBR not submitted to PMRT, and 84 reconstructions receiving PMRT in Group 2. Patients' characteristics, postoperative complication and revisional surgery rate were examined. PMRT characteristics and subcutaneous tissue thickness, measured in Group 2 by CT scan, were also evaluated. RESULTS Long-term complication rate was 11.2% in Group 1 vs. 21.4% in Group 2 (P-value = .019). Capsular contracture represented the only complication associated to a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P-value < .001). In Group 2, only 4.8% implant loss and 8.3% severe capsular contracture rate was found. In patients who underwent PMRT, 38.9% of complications settled with no consequences, and only 4.8% of patients needed revisional surgery in the long-term FU. According to multivariate analysis, drug intake and PMRT were significantly associated with postoperative complications. In Group 2, a thinner subcutaneous tissue was linked to a higher complication risk. CONCLUSION In our series, patients treated with PPBR who underwent PMRT, presented a low complication rate and minimal need for revisional surgery in the long-term follow-up, suggesting that this technique is feasible and safe also in PMRT context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Polotto
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham, UK; Breast Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma (PR), Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Pedrazzi
- Neuroscience Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma (PR), Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vizcay M, Saha S, Mohammad A, Pu LL, Yoshimura K, Magalon G, Khouri R, Coleman S, Rigotti G, DeFazio S. Current Fat Grafting Practices and Preferences: A Survey from Members of ISPRES. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e4849. [PMID: 37006989 PMCID: PMC10060090 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Fat grafting has established its niche in a wide spectrum of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. A consensus-based method of harvest, processing, enrichment, injection, and assessment is lacking, despite the rising trends in its application. We conducted a survey among plastic surgeons to evaluate and identify trends of fat grafting practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macarena Vizcay
- From the Reconstructive Microsurgery Service, University Department of Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS MultiMedica Group Milan, Italy
| | - Shivangi Saha
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Arbab Mohammad
- Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India
| | - Lee L.Q. Pu
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Ca
| | - Kotaro Yoshimura
- Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Guy Magalon
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | - Sydney Coleman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa
| | - Gino Rigotti
- San Francesco Hospital, Via Monte Ortigara, Verona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e4821. [PMID: 36845868 PMCID: PMC9946425 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) entered the market in the early 2000s and their use has increased thereafter. Several retrospective cohort studies and single surgeon series reported benefits with the use of ADMs. However, robust evidence supporting these advantages is lacking. There is the need to define the role for ADMs in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) after mastectomy. Methods A panel of world-renowned breast specialists was convened to evaluate evidence, express personal viewpoints, and establish recommendation for the use of ADMs for subpectoral one-/two-stage IBBR (compared with no ADM use) for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Based on the voting outcome, the following recommendation emerged as a consensus statement: the panel members suggest subpectoral one- or two-stage IBBR either with ADMs or without ADMs for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction (with very low certainty of evidence). Conclusions The systematic review has revealed a very low certainty of evidence for most of the important outcomes in ADM-assisted IBBR and the absence of standard tools for evaluating clinical outcomes. Forty-five percent of panel members expressed a conditional recommendation either in favor of or against the use of ADMs in subpectoral one- or two-stages IBBR for adult women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction. Future subgroup analyses could help identify relevant clinical and pathological factors to select patients for whom one technique could be preferable to another.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sui Y, Kor PPK, Li M, Wang J. Effects of a Social Media-Based Mind-Body Intervention Embedded With Acupressure and Mindfulness for Stress Reduction Among Family Caregivers of Frail Older Adults: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e42861. [PMID: 36804167 PMCID: PMC9989915 DOI: 10.2196/42861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family caregivers of frail older adults experience high levels of stress. Mind-body interventions (MBIs) focused on caregiver stress are often limited in teaching approaches, difficult to practice, and costly. A social media-based MBI embedded with mindfulness meditation (MM) and self-administered acupressure (SA) may be effective for family caregivers, offer greater usability, and lead to greater adherence. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and preliminary effects of a social media-based MBI embedded with MM and SA on family caregivers of frail older adults and to investigate the preliminary effects of the intervention using a pilot randomized controlled trial. METHODS A 2-arm randomized controlled trial design was adopted. Family caregivers of frail older adults (n=64) were randomized into either the intervention group (n=32), receiving 8 weeks of social media-based MM and SA, or the control group (n=32), receiving brief education on caregiving for people with frailty. The primary outcome (caregiver stress) and secondary outcomes (caregiver burden, sleep quality, and mindfulness awareness and attention) were measured using a web-based survey at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and at the 3-month follow-up (T2). RESULTS The feasibility of the intervention was established with a high attendance rate (87.5%), high usability score (79), and low attrition rate (1.6%). The generalized estimating equation results showed that participants in the intervention group at T1 and T2 experienced a significant improvement in stress reduction (P=.02 and P=.04, respectively), sleep quality (P=.004 and P=.01, respectively), and mindful awareness and attention (P=.006 and P=.02, respectively) compared with the control group. There were no substantial improvements in caregiver burden at T1 and T2 (P=.59 and P=.47, respectively). A focus group session conducted after the intervention had 5 themes: impact on the family caregivers, difficulty in practicing the intervention, the strength of the program, the limitations of the program, and perception of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS The findings support the feasibility and preliminary effects of social media-based MBI embedded with acupressure and MM on reducing stress among family caregivers of frail older people and enhancing sleep quality and mindfulness levels. A future study with a larger and more diverse sample is proposed to evaluate the longer-term effects and generalizability of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100049507; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=128031.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufang Sui
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Patrick Pui Kin Kor
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Mengli Li
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jingjing Wang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Emanuele Lisa AV, Salgarello M, Huscher A, Corsi F, Piovani D, Rubbino F, Andreoletti S, Papa G, Klinger F, Tinterri C, Testori A, Scorsetti M, Veronesi P, Leonardi MC, Rietjens M, Cortinovis U, Summo V, Rampino Cordaro E, Parodi PC, Persichetti P, Barone M, De Santis G, Murolo M, Riccio M, Aquinati A, Cavaliere F, Vaia N, Pagura G, Dalla Venezia E, Bassetto F, Vindigni V, Ciuffreda L, Bocchiotti MA, Sciarillo A, Renzi N, Meneghini G, Kraljic T, Loreti A, Fortunato L, Pino V, Vinci V, Klinger M. The Effect of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on One- and Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction and on Autologous Reconstruction: A Multicenter Italian Study among 18 Senonetwork Breast Centres. Breast J 2023; 2023:6688466. [PMID: 37205012 PMCID: PMC10188256 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6688466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Purpose In modern breast cancer treatment, a growing role has been observed for breast reconstruction together with an increase in clinical indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Choosing the optimum type of reconstructive technique is a clinical challenge. We therefore conducted a national multicenter study to analyze the impact of PMRT on breast reconstruction. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control multicenter study on women undergoing breast reconstruction. Data were collected from 18 Italian Breast Centres and stored in a cumulative database which included the following: autologous reconstruction, direct-to-implant (DTI), and tissue expander/immediate (TE/I). For all patients, we described complications and surgical endpoints to complications such as reconstruction failure, explant, change in type of reconstruction, and reintervention. Results From 2001 to April 2020, 3116 patients were evaluated. The risk for any complication was significantly increased in patients receiving PMRT (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.33-2.24; p < 0.001). PMRT was associated with a significant increase in the risk of capsular contracture in the DTI and TE/I groups (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.57-3.20; p < 0.001). Comparing type of procedures, the risk of failure (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.06-3.12, p=0.030), explant (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 3.85-7.83, p < 0.001), and severe complications (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.88-3.43, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group undergoing DTI reconstruction as compared to TE/I reconstruction. Conclusion Our study confirms that autologous reconstruction is the procedure least impacted by PMRT, while DTI appears to be the most impacted by PMRT, when compared with TE/I which shows a lower rate of explant and reconstruction failure. The trial is registered with NCT04783818, and the date of registration is 1 March, 2021, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa
- Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Director of the Residency Program of Plastic Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Huscher
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Poliambulanza “Guido Berlucchi” Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fabio Corsi
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Piovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Rubbino
- Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Andreoletti
- Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Papa
- Department of Plastic Surgery, UCO, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Tinterri
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Testori
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Senology, Department of Oncology and Oncohematology, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mario Rietjens
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cortinovis
- Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Summo
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rampino Cordaro
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | - Mauro Barone
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio, Modena, Italy
| | - Giorgio De Santis
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio, Modena, Italy
| | - Matteo Murolo
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Michele Riccio
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Angelica Aquinati
- Department of Breast Surgery and Integrated Senology Centre, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Francesco Cavaliere
- Department of Breast Surgery and Integrated Senology Centre, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Nicola Vaia
- Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 3 Veneziana, Venice, Italy
| | - Giulia Pagura
- Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 3 Veneziana, Venice, Italy
| | - Erica Dalla Venezia
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Franco Bassetto
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Vindigni
- Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Luigi Ciuffreda
- Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Sciarillo
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASUGI Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nadia Renzi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASUGI Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Graziano Meneghini
- Functional Department Transmural Breast Surgery, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Tajna Kraljic
- Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Loreti
- Department of Plastic Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucio Fortunato
- Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Pino
- Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeriano Vinci
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Klinger
- Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sgroi G, Russo G, Maglia A, Catanuto G, Barry P, Karakatsanis A, Rocco N, Pappalardo F. Evaluation of word embedding models to extract and predict surgical data in breast cancer. BMC Bioinformatics 2022; 22:631. [PMID: 36384559 PMCID: PMC9667561 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-05038-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decisions in healthcare usually rely on the goodness and completeness of data that could be coupled with heuristics to improve the decision process itself. However, this is often an incomplete process. Structured interviews denominated Delphi surveys investigate experts' opinions and solve by consensus complex matters like those underlying surgical decision-making. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a field of study that combines computer science, artificial intelligence, and linguistics. NLP can then be used as a valuable help in building a correct context in surgical data, contributing to the amelioration of surgical decision-making. Results We applied NLP coupled with machine learning approaches to predict the context (words) owning high accuracy from the words nearest to Delphi surveys, used as input. Conclusions The proposed methodology has increased the usefulness of Delphi surveys favoring the extraction of keywords that can represent a specific clinical context. It permits the characterization of the clinical context suggesting words for the evaluation process of the data. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-022-05038-6.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yehia ZA, Punglia RS, Wong J. Integration of Radiation and Reconstruction After Mastectomy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:237-244. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Sewart E, Turner NL, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Skillman J, Whisker L, Thrush S, Barnes N, Holcombe C, Potter S. The Impact of Radiotherapy on Patient-reported Outcomes of Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Mesh. Ann Surg 2022; 275:992-1001. [PMID: 32657919 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the impact of PMRT on PROs of IBBR performed with and without mesh. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PMRT is increasingly given to improve breast cancer outcomes but can adversely impact complications after IBBR.Little; however, is known about the impact of PMRT on the PROs of IBBR, especially when mesh is used. METHODS The implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation prospective cohort study recruited consecutive women undergoing immediate IBBR from 81 UK breast and plastic surgical units. Demographic, operative, oncological, and 3-month complication data were collected, and patients consented to receive validated PRO questionnaires at 18-months. The association between IBBR, PMRT, and PROs were investigated using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically-relevant confounders and including a random-effect to account for potential clustering by center. RESULTS A total of 1163 women consented to receive 18-month questionnaires of whom 730 (63%) completed it. Patients undergoing PMRT (214 patients) reported worse PROs in 3 BREAST-Q domains: satisfaction with breasts [-6.27 points, P = 0.008, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-10.91, -1.63)], satisfaction with outcome [-7.53 points, P = 0.002, CI (-12.20, -2.85)] and physical well-being [-6.55 points, P < 0.001, CI (-9.43, -3.67)]. Overall satisfaction was worse in the PMRT group [OR 0.497, P = 0.002, CI (0.32, 0.77)]. These effects were not ameliorated by mesh use. CONCLUSIONS PMRT may adversely affect PROs after IBBR irrespective of whether mesh is used. These findings should be discussed with all patients considering IBBR and when indications for PMRT are borderline to enable informed decision-making regarding oncological and reconstructive treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN37664281.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Sewart
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Clifton, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicholas L Turner
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Clifton, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth J Conroy
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre (LCTC), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ramsey I Cutress
- Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Joanna Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Lisa Whisker
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Steven Thrush
- Breast Unit, Worcester Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK
| | - Nicola Barnes
- Nightingale Breast Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shelley Potter
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Clifton, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Catanuto G, Rocco N, Maglia A, Barry P, Karakatsanis A, Heil J, Karakatsanis A, Weber WP, Gonzalez E, Chatterjee A, Urban C, Sund M, Paulinelli RR, Markopoulos C, Rubio IT, Masannat YA, Meani F, Koppiker CB, Holcombe C, Benson JR, Dietz JR, Walker M, Mátrai Z, Shaukat A, Gulluoglu B, Brenelli F, Fitzal F, Mele M, Sgroi G, Russo G, Pappalardo F, Nava M. Text mining and word embedding for classification of decision making variables in breast cancer surgery. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1503-1509. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
14
|
Optimal Timing of Expander-to-Implant Exchange after Irradiation in Immediate Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149:185e-194e. [PMID: 35077405 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Time intervals for expander-to-implant exchange from radiation therapy have been reported to reduce device failure. This study investigated the optimal timing of expander-to-implant exchange after irradiation in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS This retrospective review enrolled consecutive patients who underwent immediate two-stage breast reconstruction and radiation therapy to tissue expanders from 2010 to 2019. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index were used to estimate the optimal time from radiation therapy to implant placement in terms of 49-day (early) and 2-year (late) complications. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for each complication. RESULTS Of the 1675 patients, 133 were included. The 49-day and 2-year complication rates were 8.3 percent and 29.7 percent, respectively. Capsular contracture was the most common 2-year complication. The Youden index indicated that implant placement at 131 days after radiation therapy was most effective in reducing the 49-day complications, but that the 2-year complication was less significant, with lower sensitivity and area under the curve. Modified radical mastectomy, expander fill volume at radiation therapy, and size of permanent implant increased the odds of 49-day complications; none of them was associated with the odds of 2-year complications. CONCLUSIONS To reduce short-term complications, the best time point for permanent implant placement was 131 days after radiation therapy. However, there was no significant time interval for reducing long-term complications. Capsular contracture was an irreversible complication of radiation injury that was not modified by postirradiation variables including the time from irradiation or size of permanent implant. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
|
15
|
Citgez B, Yigit B, Bas S. Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e21763. [PMID: 35251834 PMCID: PMC8890601 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
16
|
Tampaki EC, Tampakis A. Breast Reconstruction: Necessity for Further Standardization of the Current Surgical Techniques Attempting to Facilitate Scientific Evaluation and Select Tailored Individualized Procedures Optimizing Patient Satisfaction. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 16:574-583. [PMID: 35087360 DOI: 10.1159/000518745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Various breast cancer reconstruction methods and novel surgical techniques include autologous or allogenic procedures, which can increase patient's quality of life and provide options when dealing with patients seen as challenging clinical scenarios. Summary Our aim was to review the current literature and present published evidence on innovative standards in whole breast reconstruction. Advances in flap monitoring or newly published data regarding neurotization in breast reconstruction, arm lymphedema management, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma reconstruction treatment, and robotic surgery with regard to radiotherapy define innovative standards in the breast reconstruction setting. The role of meshes/acellular dermal matrix and fat grafting as well as optimal sequencing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction appear highly debatable also in expert panel meetings rendering further clinical research including RCTs imperative. Key Messages There is an abundance of novel available techniques, which mandate further standardization, facilitating scientific evaluation in an attempt to help surgeons select tailored procedures for each patient with the goal to promote informed decision-making in breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Athanasios Tampakis
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang F, Wang X, Guo H. The Role of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Information in Selection of Immediate Reconstruction After Modified Radical Mastectomy-A Randomized Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:2708-2713. [PMID: 34494129 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02567-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate breast reconstruction has become an important supplement after modified radical mastectomy. The role of preoperative breast reconstruction information has not been widely popularized in China. It may play an important role in choosing immediate breast reconstruction. In this paper, we investigated whether there was an effect of the role of preoperative breast reconstruction information on the difference about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent. METHODS From 2015 January to March 2018, newly admitted 100 patients with breast carcinoma must receive modified radical mastectomy. All these patients' conditions met the requirements of immediate breast reconstruction. Patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics were recorded. They were randomly classified into two groups (A & B). Preoperative breast reconstruction information was designed and prepared. When it came to signing operation consent, Group A received preoperative breast reconstruction information and Group B did not receive it. We recorded whether they were willing to receive immediate breast reconstruction in different groups. RESULTS There was no significant difference in patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics (P > 0.05). Thirty-two patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 18 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group A when 24 patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 26 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group B. There was a statistical significance (P < 0.05) between the above two groups. CONCLUSION Preoperative breast reconstruction information may be a vital role for explaining about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
|
18
|
Influence of Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:445-456. [PMID: 34610389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to compare breast-related complications between hypofractionated adjuvant postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) and conventional fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in patients with breast cancer undergoing reconstruction by reconstruction surgery type. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data from a total of 396 patients with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received adjuvant PMRT according to either a conventional fractionation or hypofractionation schedule. We analyzed breast-related complications according to the timing of breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed). In cases of delayed reconstruction, only PMRT delivered before final delayed reconstruction was included. A major breast complication was defined as a breast-related toxicity that required reoperation or rehospitalization after the end of RT. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 35.3 months (range, 8.8-122.7 months). Of all patients, 267 received immediate breast reconstruction and 129 received delayed breast reconstruction. In patients with immediate breast reconstruction, 91 were treated with conventional RT and 176 received hypofractionated RT. The occurrence of major breast-related complications did not differ significantly between the 2 fractionation regimens. Hypofractionated RT did not increase major wound problems (infection and dehiscence) compared with conventional RT. Furthermore, major contracture occurred significantly less frequently in hypofractionated RT. Of the patients who had delayed breast reconstruction, 48 received conventional RT and 81 received hypofractionated RT. There was no difference in the incidence of major breast complications between these 2 RT groups, and no difference in major breast complications were reported for either 1- or 2-stage delayed reconstruction. A time interval of >10 months between PMRT and final definitive reconstruction had a significantly lower incidence of major breast complications. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated RT appears to be comparable with conventional fractionated RT in terms of breast-related complications in patients with breast cancer undergoing reconstruction, regardless of breast reconstruction type. An ongoing prospective randomized trial should confirm our findings.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rojas DP, Leonardi MC, Frassoni S, Morra A, Gerardi MA, La Rocca E, Cattani F, Luraschi R, Fodor C, Zaffaroni M, Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Intra M, Bagnardi V, Orecchia R, Dicuonzo S, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Implant risk failure in patients undergoing postmastectomy 3-week hypofractionated radiotherapy after immediate reconstruction. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:105-113. [PMID: 34419507 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate reconstruction failure (RF) rate in patients receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Stage II-III breast cancer patients, treated with HF-PMRT using intensity modulated radiotherapy were stratified in two groups according to IBR: single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI-group) and two-stage expander and implant (TE/I-group). Irradiated patients were matched with non-irradiated ones who underwent the same IBR during the same period. Prescription dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions to chest wall and infra/supraclavicular nodal region. Primary endpoint was RF defined as the need of major revisional surgery (MaRS) for implant removal or conversion to autologous reconstruction. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor revisional surgeries (MiRS) including implant repositioning or substitution with another implant. RESULTS One hundred and seven irradiated patients (62 in TE/I-group, 45 in DTI-group) were matched with 107 non-irradiated subjects. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (0.1-6.1) In the TE/I setting, MaRS was performed in 8/62 irradiated patients (12.9%) of the irradiated TE/I group compared to 1/62 (1.6%) non-irradiated subjects (p = 0.015). In the DTI setting, MaRs occurred in 3/45 irradiated patients (6.7%) compared to 1/45 non-irradiated ones (2.2%) (p = 0.35). Overall MaRS rate was 10.3% in the irradiated group. MiRS was performed in 35.6% and 31.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated DTI-groups (p = 0.65), respectively, and in 12.9% and 8.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated TE/I groups (p = 0.38), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared to the non-irradiated counterparts, the TE/I group showed higher rate of RF, while no statistically significant difference was observed for the DTI group. The use of hypofractionation and IMRT to implant-based IBR did not seem to increase the risk of RF which appeared to be in line with the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Eliana La Rocca
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Rietjens
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca De Lorenzi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Intra
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Prantl L, Moellhoff N, von Fritschen U, Giunta R, Germann G, Kehrer A, Thiha A, Ehrl D, Zeman F, Broer PN, Heidekrueger PI. Effect of Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 4577 Cases. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:627-631. [PMID: 33346536 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is a state-of-the art procedure. Several patient-related factors have been identified with regard to the safety and efficacy of these reconstructions. The presented study investigates the impact of prereconstruction radiation on outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free-flap breast reconstructions using largest database available in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2011 and 2019, 3926 female patients underwent 4577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions in 22 different German breast cancer centers. The cases were divided into a no-radiation (NR) and a radiation (R) group, according to radiation status before reconstruction. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free-flap outcome. RESULTS Overall, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the rate of total flap loss [1.9% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.743], partial flap loss [0.9% (NR) vs 1.5 (R), P = 0.069], and revision surgery [vascular revision: 4.4% (NR) vs 4.1% (R), P = 0.686; wound revision: 7.6% (NR) vs 9.4% (R), P = 0.122]. However, the patients had a significantly higher risk of developing wound healing disturbances at the recipient site [1.2% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.035] and showed significantly longer hospitalization {8 [SD, 8.4 (NR)] vs 9 [SD, 15.4 {R}] days, P = 0.006} after prereconstruction radiation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that DIEP flap reconstruction after radiation therapy is feasible. Women with a history of radiation therapy should, however, be informed in detail about the higher risk for wound healing disturbances at the recipient site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Prantl
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Nicholas Moellhoff
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - Uwe von Fritschen
- Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Helios Hospital Emil von Behring, Berlin
| | - Riccardo Giunta
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - Guenter Germann
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Esthetic and Handsurgery, ETHIANUM Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Andreas Kehrer
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Aung Thiha
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Denis Ehrl
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - Florian Zeman
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Peter Niclas Broer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Giunta RE, Hansson E, Andresen C, Athanasopoulos E, Benedetto GD, Celebic AB, Caulfield R, Costa H, Demirdöver C, Georgescu A, Hemelryck TV, Henley M, Kappos EA, Karabeg R, Karhunen-Enckell U, Korvald C, Mortillet SD, Murray DJ, Palenčár D, Piatkowski A, Pompeo FSD, Psaras G, Rakhorst H, Rogelj K, Rosenkrantz Hölmich L, Schaefer DJ, Spendel S, Stepic N, Vandevoort M, Vasar O, Waters R, Zic R, Moellhoff N, Elander A. ESPRAS Survey on Breast Reconstruction in Europe. HANDCHIR MIKROCHIR P 2021; 53:340-348. [PMID: 33784792 DOI: 10.1055/a-1424-1428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Leadership Forum (ELF) of the European Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (ESPRAS) previously identified the need for harmonisation of breast reconstruction standards in Europe, in order to strengthen the role of plastic surgeons. This study aims to survey the status, current trends and potential regional differences in the practice of breast reconstruction in Europe, with emphasis on equity and access. MATERIALS AND METHODS A largescale web-based questionnaire was sent to consultant plastic and reconstructive surgeons, who are experienced in breast reconstruction and with understanding of the national situation in their country. Suitable participants were identified via the Executive Committee (ExCo) of ESPRAS and national delegates of ESPRAS. The results were evaluated and related to evidence-based literature. RESULTS A total of 33 participants from 29 European countries participated in this study. Overall, the incidence of breast reconstruction was reported to be relatively low across Europe, comparable to other large geographic regions, such as North America. Equity of provision and access to breast reconstruction was distributed evenly within Europe, with geographic regions potentially affecting the type of reconstruction offered. Standard practices with regard to radiotherapy differed between countries and a clear demand for European guidelines on breast reconstruction was reported. CONCLUSION This study identified distinct lack of consistency in international practice patterns across European countries and a strong demand for consistent European guidance. Large-scale and multi-centre European clinical trials are required to further elucidate the presented areas of interest and to define European standard operating procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo E Giunta
- Abteilung für Hand-, Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München
| | - Emma Hansson
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg
| | - Carolina Andresen
- Plastic Reconstructive Craniomaxillofacial Hand and Microsurgical Unit, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Elias Athanasopoulos
- Dept. of Plastic Surgery, 424 General Military Training Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Giovanni di Benedetto
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Robert Caulfield
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Horacio Costa
- Aveiro University, Plastic Reconstructive Craniomaxilofacial Hand and Microsurgical Unit, Gaia Hospital Center
| | - Cenk Demirdöver
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University,Izmir, Turkey
| | - Alexandru Georgescu
- University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu, Clinic of Plastic Surgery, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Mark Henley
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, United Kingdom
| | - Elisabeth A Kappos
- Breast Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Handsurgery, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reuf Karabeg
- Surgical Clinic "Karabeg", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ulla Karhunen-Enckell
- Head of Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
| | - Christian Korvald
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stephane de Mortillet
- Chirurgie Plastique, Reconstructrice et Esthétique, Pôle santé Léonard de Vinci, Chambray les Tours cedex, France
| | - Dylan J Murray
- National Paediatric Craniofacial Center, Children's Hospital Ireland, Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Drahomír Palenčár
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical Faculty of Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Hinne Rakhorst
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery, ZGT, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Klemen Rogelj
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Dirk J Schaefer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic & Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Spendel
- Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nenad Stepic
- Clinic for Plastic Surgery and Burns Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Olavi Vasar
- Hospital of Reconstructive Surgery, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Ruth Waters
- Department of Burns & Plastic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rado Zic
- University Hospital Dubrava, Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb
| | - Nicholas Moellhoff
- Abteilung für Hand-, Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München
| | - Anna Elander
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rocco N, Catanuto G, Chiodini P, Rispoli C, Nava MB. Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Rocco
- G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; Naples Italy
| | - Giuseppe Catanuto
- Multidisciplinary Breast Unit; Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro; Catania Italy
- G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; Catania Italy
| | - Paolo Chiodini
- Physical and Mental Health; University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"; Napoli Italy
| | | | - Maurizio B Nava
- G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim DY, Park E, Heo CY, Jin US, Kim EK, Han W, Shin KH, Kim IA. Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis. Breast 2020; 55:37-44. [PMID: 33316582 PMCID: PMC7744765 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated whether hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) increased breast-related complication(s) compared to conventional fractionated RT in reconstructed breast cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review including 349 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between 2009 and 2018 at two institutions. All patients were treated with adjuvant RT via either a conventional fractionated or hypofractionated regimen. We defined a major breast complication as a breast-related toxic event requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization during the follow-up period after the end of RT. RESULTS The median follow-up was 32.3 months (4.8-118.5 months); 126 patients had conventional fractionated RT, and 223 patients received hypofractionated RT. In patients with mastectomy, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of any or major breast-related complications between the two fractionation regimens. In patients undergoing BCS, incidence of any breast complication showed no difference between two RT groups and no major breast complication was reported as well. Hypofractionated RT did not increase major wound problem (infection and dehiscence) compared to conventional RT. Incidence of major contracture was significantly lower in hypofractionated RT. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in the occurrence of any or major breast-related complications between the two different fractionation regimens, even in patients with mastectomy. Hypofractionated RT may be used comparable to conventional fractionated RT in terms of breast-related complications in reconstructed breast cancer patients. The prospective randomized trial would be necessary to clarify this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Yun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eonju Park
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Yeong Heo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ung Sik Jin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Su XT, Wang LQ, Li JL, Zhang N, Wang L, Shi GX, Yang JW, Liu CZ. Acupuncture Therapy for Cognitive Impairment: A Delphi Expert Consensus Survey. Front Aging Neurosci 2020; 12:596081. [PMID: 33328975 PMCID: PMC7732673 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.596081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Current research evidence challenges clinical decision-making when acupuncture is taken into consideration in the treatment of cognitive impairment (CI). Aiming to provide some viable recommendations for acupuncture practitioners in dealing with actual clinic issues, an expert consensus study was conducted. Methods A clinical question investigation among 47 acupuncturists yielded 24 initial items. Subsequently, systematic reviews on acupuncture for CI were searched within three online databases. A panel of 30 authoritative experts were requested to respond with agreement, neutrality, or disagreement for each item. Consensus establishment was defined as the percentage of agreement on a given item >80%. Results Following a 2-round Delphi survey, there were 21 items reaching consensus and three items resulting in no consensus; of which 10 items reached 90∼100% agreement, and 80∼90% expert agreement was achieved for 11 items. These items could be roughly categorized into six domains: (1) therapeutic effects of acupuncture, (2) therapeutic principles, (3) acupoint selection and combination, (4) acupuncture parameters, (5) considerable combined therapies, and (6) possible adverse events. Conclusion Without ready-made guidelines, this expert consensus may be conducive to guide acupuncturists in implementing clinical acupuncture practice for CI. Moreover, given the lack of high-quality research evidence and plenty of unresolved clinical issues in this field, it is of necessity to carry out more studies to better clarify the treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin-Tong Su
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Qiong Wang
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Ling Li
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Na Zhang
- School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Lu Wang
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Guang-Xia Shi
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jing-Wen Yang
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Cun-Zhi Liu
- International Acupuncture and Moxibustion Innovation Institute, School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Maes-Carballo M, Mignini L, Martín-Díaz M, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Khan KS. Quality and reporting of clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment: A systematic review. Breast 2020; 53:201-211. [PMID: 32858405 PMCID: PMC7473996 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality, well-reported clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs) underpinned by systematic reviews are needed. We appraised the quality and reporting of CPGs and CSs for breast cancer (BC) treatment. METHODS Following protocol registration (Prospero no: CRD42020164801), CPGs and CSs on BC treatment were identified, without language restrictions, through a systematic search of bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CDSR) and online sources (12 guideline databases and 51 professional society websites) from January 2017 to June 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate assessing overall quality using AGREE II (% of maximum score) and reporting compliance using RIGHT (% of total 35 items); reviewer agreement was 98% and 96% respectively. RESULTS There were 59 relevant guidance documents (43 CPGs, 16 CSs), of which 20 used systematic reviews for evidence synthesis. The median overall quality was 54.0% (IQR 35.9-74.3) and the median overall reporting compliance was 60.9% (IQR 44.5-84.4). The correlation between quality and reporting was 0.9. Compared to CSs, CPGs had better quality (55.4% vs 44.2%; p = 0.032) and reporting (67.18% vs 44.5%; p = 0.005). Compared to subjective methods of evidence analysis, guidance documents that used systematic reviews had better quality (76.3% vs 51.4%; p = 0.001) and reporting (87.1% vs 59.4%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The quality and reporting of CPGs and CSs in BC treatment were moderately strong. Systematic reviews should be used to improve the quality and reporting of CPGs and CSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Maes-Carballo
- Department of General Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
| | | | | | - Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBS, Granada, Spain
| | - Khalid Saeed Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Flaherty F, Vizcay M, Chang EI. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Cutting Edge and Controversies. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40137-020-00274-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
27
|
Weber WP, Morrow M, Boniface JD, Pusic A, Montagna G, Kappos EA, Ritter M, Haug M, Kurzeder C, Saccilotto R, Schulz A, Benson J, Fitzal F, Matrai Z, Shaw J, Peeters MJV, Potter S, Heil J, González E, Elzayat M, Koller R, Gnant M, Brenelli F, Paulinelli RR, Zobel V, Joukainen S, Karhunen-Enckell U, Kauhanen S, Piat JM, Bjelic-Radisic V, Faridi A, Heitmann C, Hoffmann J, Kneser U, Kümmel S, Kühn T, Kontos M, Tampaki EC, Barry M, Allweis TM, Carmon M, Hadar T, Catanuto G, Garcia-Etienne CA, Gentilini OD, Knox S, Klein B, Koppert L, Gouveia PF, Svensjö T, Bucher HC, Ess S, Ganz-Blättler U, Günthert A, Hauser N, Hynes N, Knauer M, Pfeiffer M, Rochlitz C, Tausch C, Harder Y, Zimmermann F, Schwab FD, D'Amico V, Soysal SD, Castrezana Lopez L, Fulco I, Hemkens LG, Lohsiriwat V, Gulluoglu BM, Karadeniz G, Karanlik H, Sezer A, Gulcelik MA, Emiroglu M, Kovacs T, Rattay T, Romics L, Vidya R, Wyld L, El-Tamer M, Sacchini V. Knowledge gaps in oncoplastic breast surgery. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e375-e385. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30084-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
28
|
Shumway DA, Momoh AO, Sabel MS, Jagsi R. Integration of Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2329-2340. [PMID: 32442071 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dean A Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Adeyiza O Momoh
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michael S Sabel
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Potter S, Trickey A, Rattay T, O'Connell RL, Dave R, Baker E, Whisker L, Skillman J, Gardiner MD, Macmillan RD, Holcombe C. Therapeutic mammaplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2020; 107:832-844. [PMID: 32073654 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) may be an alternative to mastectomy, but few well designed studies have evaluated the success of this approach or compared the short-term outcomes of TM with mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Data from the national iBRA-2 and TeaM studies were combined to compare the safety and short-term outcomes of TM and mastectomy with or without IBR. METHODS The subgroup of patients in the TeaM study who underwent TM to avoid mastectomy were identified, and data on demographics, complications, oncology and adjuvant treatment were compared with those of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR in the iBRA-2 study. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful breast-conserving procedures in the TM group. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and time to adjuvant therapy. RESULTS A total of 2916 patients (TM 376; mastectomy 1532; mastectomy and IBR 1008) were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TM were more likely to be obese and to have undergone bilateral surgery than those having IBR. However, patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR were more likely to experience complications than the TM group (TM: 79, 21·0 per cent; mastectomy: 570, 37·2 per cent; mastectomy and IBR: 359, 35·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Breast conservation was possible in 87·0 per cent of patients who had TM, and TM did not delay adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION TM may allow high-risk patients who would not be candidates for IBR to avoid mastectomy safely. Further work is needed to explore the comparative patient-reported and cosmetic outcomes of the different approaches, and to establish long-term oncological safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Potter
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Breast Care Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - A Trickey
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - T Rattay
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | | | - R Dave
- Nightingale Breast Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Baker
- Department of Breast Surgery, Airedale General Hospital, Keighley, UK
| | - L Whisker
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - J Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - M D Gardiner
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - R D Macmillan
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - C Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|