Prognosis of colorectal cancer in the elderly

Colorectal Cancer in Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Patients: Clinicopathological Features and Survivals

Purpose

Elderly population will comprise a substantial proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We examined patients older than 80 years according to their clinical and pathological characteristics to fully understand the elderly patients.

Methods

CRC patients, 60 years or older at diagnosis, admitted between 2009 and 2014 at our hospital were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: elderly (aged > 80 years, n = 133), and controls (aged 60 to 79 years, n = 596). Patient’s demographics, risk factors for prognosis of CRC, Clinicopathological parameters, treatment, and survival rates were compared.

Results

The mean ages were 83.9 and 64.8 years, respectively. Male-to-female ratio and tumor sidedness were comparable in both groups. Prognostic factors found in univariate analysis; differentiation, stage, lymphovascular invasion, and carcinoembryonic antigen showed no statistical difference. The microsatellite instability status and number of retrieved lymph nodes were also similar (17.2 vs 21.6, P = 0.505). A significant difference was found in the treatment approach for chemotherapy as the elderly patients with stage III and IV tend to have omitted adjuvant (43.6% vs. 92.8%, P < 0.001) or palliative (35.8% vs. 89.4%, P = 0.016) chemotherapy. Except in stage I, elderly patients showed significantly lower overall survival rates.

Conclusion

Current study shows far-elderly patients with CRC were less likely to receive standard treatments, which might have resulted in an inferior outcome. As the number of elderly patients with CRC increase, our results provide a basis for further clinical and molecular investigations of elderly CRC patients.

Prognostic Significance of Elevated Endothelin-1 Levels in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Background

Prognostic factors from clinical, laboratory and pathological data of patients with colorectal cancer are essential to identify high-risk groups to whom beneficial adjuvant therapy could be given. Endothelin-1, a growth factor, has been associated with the development and spread of solid tumours. This prospective study was performed to determine whether preoperative plasma big ET-1 levels might be useful as a prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Method

Sixty-five consecutive patients with colorectal cancer confirmed by biopsy were included prospectively into this study over a 12-month period. Plasma samples from a peripheral vein were obtained prior to surgery. Univariate analysis of survival using age (< or > 70 years), sex, Dukes’ stage (A&B versus C), tumour size (< or > 50 mm), vascular invasion and plasma big ET-1 levels was performed and significant factors were then analysed with the Cox regression model.

Results

Three variables, age, Dukes’ tumour stage and plasma big ET-1 levels, were found to have prognostic significance (p<0.05). Factors associated with a poorer prognosis were age >70 years (p=0.02), Dukes’ C tumours (p=0.04) and plasma big ET-1 levels >4.2 pg/mL (p=0.02). The Cox regression model identified the same three variables as having independent prognostic value for overall survival.

Conclusion

Preoperative plasma big ET-1 levels may be useful in predicting overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Plasma big ET-1 levels may be useful in the selection of high-risk lymph node-negative patients with colorectal cancer for adjuvant therapy.

A comparative study of short-term outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly population

BACKGROUND

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a disease of the elderly, and with an ageing population, oncological surgical procedures for CRC in the elderly is expected to increase. However, the balance between surgical benefits and risks associated with age and comorbidities in elderly patients is obscure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective database of consecutive patients who received CRC surgery was used to compare short-term surgical and oncological outcomes between patients aged ≥75 and <75 years old undergoing CRC resection.

RESULTS

There were 54 patients (63.5%) in the <75 group and 31 patients (36.5%) in the ≥75 group. Overall, there were no differences between the <75 and ≥75 groups in postoperative HDU/ITU stay, median hospital LOS or 30-day mortality rates. Patients ≥75 had a higher preoperative performance status (25.9% versus 71.0%, p < .001), but no difference in ASA Grade and referral pattern, proportion of emergency operations, cancer staging, resection margins, achievement of curative resection or median lymph node yield. There was a significantly higher use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the <75 age group (48.1% versus 25.8%, p = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate patient selection, CRC resection in elderly patients is not associated with higher postoperative mortality or worse short-term oncological benefits.

Overall Survival of Elderly Patients Having Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Comparable to Younger Patients: Results from a South Asian Population

Introduction

There has been a continuous debate on whether elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) fair worse. The aim of this study is to assess the thirty-day mortality (TDM) and overall survival (OS) of elderly patients undergoing surgery for CRC.

Method

OS between two groups (≥70 versus <70 years) having surgery for CRC was analyzed. Demographics, tumour characteristics, and serological markers were considered as independent factors. Multivariable analysis was done using the Cox proportional hazard model. We also compared overall survival in the elderly versus those <60 and <50 years.

Results

477 patients, 160 elderly (55% male; median age 75, range 70–89) and 317 younger patients (49% male; median age 55, range 16 to 69), were studied. Overall survival in CRC patients ≥70 is comparable to <70 (P = 0.45) and <60 years (P = 0.08). Poor OS was observed in the ≥70 versus <50 years (P = 0.03). TDM in the elderly was poor (P < 0.05). Postoperative cardiac complication was the only determinant affecting survival in the elderly (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

OS in elderly CRC patients having surgery is not worse compared to <70 and <60 years although the TDM was higher. Postoperative cardiac complications significantly affected OS in those ≥70 compared to those <50 years. Chronological age alone should not negatively influence surgical decision-making in the elderly.

Role of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly

The prevalence of subjects with colorectal cancer is expected to grow in the next future decades and surgery represents the most successful treatment modality for these patients. Anyway, currently elderly subjects undergo less elective surgical procedures than younger patients mainly due to the high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Some authors suggest extensive surgery, including multistage procedures, as carried out in younger patients while others promote less aggressive surgery. In older patients, laparoscopic-assisted colectomy showed a number of advantages compared to conventional open surgery that include lower stress, higher rate of independency after surgery, quicker return to prior activities and a decrease in costs. The recent advances in chemotherapy and the introduction of new surgical procedures such as the endoluminal stenting, suggest the need for a revisitation of surgical practice patterns and the role of palliative surgery, mainly for patients with advanced disease. In this article, we discuss the current role of surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Laparoscopic surgery has been proven to be an effective alternative to open surgery in patients with colon cancer. However, data on laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer are insufficient. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 307 patients with rectal cancer who were treated by open and laparoscopic curative resection at Kosin University Gospel Hospital (Busan, Korea) between January 2002 and December 2011 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Regarding treatment, 176 patients underwent an open procedure and 131 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic resection was 2.3%, compared with 5.7% after open resection (p = 0.088). Distant metastases occurred in 6.9% of the laparoscopic surgery group, compared with 24.4% in the open surgery group (p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, age (≥ 75 years vs. ≤ 60 years), preoperative staging, surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic), elevated initial CEA level, elevated follow-up CEA level, number of positive lymph nodes, and postoperative chemotherapy affected overall survival and disease free survival. However, in multivariate analysis, the surgical approach apparently did not affect long-term oncologic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were not inferior to those after open surgery. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery would be an alternative operative tool to open resection for rectal cancer, although further investigation is needed.

Implantation of a new enteral stent in obstructive colorectal cancer using interventional radiology in patients over 70 years of age

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death due to cancer in Poland. The traditional approach to treat patients included a surgical procedure. Irrespective of the surgical method being used, surgical treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction is associated with prolonged hospitalisation, and the postoperative mortality rate is approximately 5–11%. Due to these problems, more interest has been shown in less invasive methods. Prosthesis implantation is a leading endoscopic method used currently in palliative or preoperative treatment.

Aim

To compare the results of implantation of traditional stents with the results of implantation of an own stent using minimally invasive methods.

Material and methods

Left-sided colon obstruction due to cancer was an indication for transplantation. All patients were aged over 70 years and had serious concomitant diseases. The control group included 50 patients with colorectal cancer who received traditional stents in the period 2009–2011. Our stent covers only the internal length of a tumour. It is not equipped with anti-migration flares. To minimize the risk of migration it has a system of hooks that are responsible for permanent anchorage of the stent within the tumour mass.

Results

Implantation technical and clinical success defined as effective decompression of intestinal obstruction was 100% in both groups. There were 2 cases of stent migration in the control group.

Conclusions

It is possible to achieve a secure surgical anastomosis after intestinal decompression. Stent implantation is fast and safe thanks to the positioning system that was used. The use of labelled hooks is a secure anti-migration solution.

Experts reviews of the multidisciplinary consensus conference colon and rectal cancer 2012: science, opinions and experiences from the experts of surgery

The first multidisciplinary consensus conference on colon and rectal cancer was held in December 2012, achieving a majority of consensus for diagnostic and treatment decisions using the Delphi Method. This article will give a critical appraisal of the topics discussed during the meeting and in the consensus document by well-known leaders in surgery that were involved in this multidisciplinary consensus process. Scientific evidence, experience and opinions are collected to support multidisciplinary teams (MDT) with arguments for medical decision-making in diagnosis, staging and treatment strategies for patients with colon or rectal cancer. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative treatment for colon and rectal cancer. Standardizing treatment is an effective instrument to improve outcome of multidisciplinary cancer care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. In this article, a review of the following focuses; Perioperative care, age and colorectal surgery, obstructive colorectal cancer, stenting, surgical anatomical considerations, total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery and training, surgical considerations for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and local recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), surgery in stage IV colorectal cancer, definitions of quality of surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery, preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and how about functional outcome after surgery?

Curative colorectal resections in patients aged 80 years and older: clinical characteristics, morbidity, mortality and risk factors

BACKGROUND

The management of colorectal cancer in the elderly presents unique challenges. The objective of this study was to determine outcomes following curative colorectal resection in patients aged 80 years and older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study design is retrospective. Data were extracted from the university hospital database and medical records of patients aged 80 years and older operated between April 2004 and December 2009. Intervention was curative colorectal resection. Main outcome measures include postoperative morbidity, mortality and individual risk factors associated with them.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-eight patients (43.8% males, age = 84 ± 3 years) were included; 72.6% received elective surgery. A significantly higher complication rate and 30 day, 1 year and 4 year mortality were present for emergency operations compared to elective (p < 0.001). One-year survival was 65.0% for elective resections and 55.1% for emergency. At 4 years of follow-up, survival was 49.2% for the elective vs. 27.6% for emergency. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score is the only factor associated with the 30-day mortality at the multivariate analysis (p < 0.01), Dukes staging with overall mortality (p < 0.005), sex and mode of the operation with major complications (p < 0.05). A limitation of the study is that is retrospective.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest mortality rates following colorectal surgery in the elderly are in the early postoperative period, especially for emergency operations and patients with significant comorbidities. However, the 1-year survival following elective curative resection for colorectal cancer approaches 65 %. ASA score and modality of the operation (elective vs. emergency) impacted on postoperative mortality and morbidity and could be used to select patients with more favourable outcomes.

Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to define any benefits in terms of early outcome for laparoscopic colectomy in patients over 75 years old (OP) compared with the outcomes of a younger populations (YP).

METHODS

Forty elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer between 2007-2011 were studied, the patients are divided for gender, age, year of surgery, site of cancer, and comorbidity on admission and compared with 40 younger patients.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Mean (standard deviation) age was 81.3 in OP and 68.3 YP Conversion rate was the same between the two groups. There was no difference in operative mean time . The overall mortality rate was 0% percent. The surgical morbidity rate was the same but there was an increased in cardiologic e bronchopneumonia complications in older population. Patients treated with laparoscopic approach had a faster recovery of bowel function and a significant reduction of the mean length of hospital stay not age related. Laparoscopy allowed a better preservation of postoperative independence status.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients is safe and beneficial including preservation of postoperative independence and a reduction of length of hospital stay.

Elderly patients with colon cancer have unique tumor characteristics and poor survival

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colon cancer increases with age, and colon cancer predominantly affects individuals >65 years old. However, there are limited data regarding clinical and pathologic factors, treatment characteristics, and survival of older patients with colon cancer. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of increasing age on colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with colon cancer between 1988 and 2006 were identified through the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program, in Southern California. Patients were stratified into 4 age groups: 18-49, 50-64, 65-79, and ≥80 years. Clinical and pathologic characteristics and disease-specific and overall survival were compared between patients from different age groups.

RESULTS

A total of 32,819 patients were assessed. Patients aged 18 to 49 and 65 to 79 years represented the smallest and largest groups, respectively. A near equal number of males and females were diagnosed with colon cancer in the 3 youngest age groups, whereas patients who were ≥80 years old were more commonly white and female. Tumor location was different between groups, and the frequency of larger tumors (>5 cm) was greatest in youngest patients (18-49 years). The oldest patients (≥80 years) were administered chemotherapy at the lowest frequency, and disease-specific and overall survival rates decreased with increasing age.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation demonstrates that older age is associated with alterations in clinical and pathologic characteristics and decreased survival. This suggests that the phenotype of colon cancer and the efficacy of colon cancer therapies may be dependent on the age of patients.

Poor 1-year survival in elderly patients undergoing nonelective colorectal resection

BACKGROUND

Colorectal resection in elderly patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in an emergency setting.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to quantify the risks associated with nonelective colorectal resection up to 1 year after surgery in elderly patients.

DESIGN

This is a population-based observational study.

SETTING

Data were obtained from the Hospital Episode Statistics database.

POPULATION

All patients aged 70 years and older who underwent a nonelective colorectal resection in an English National Health Service Trust hospital between April 2001 and March 2008 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

: The primary outcomes measured were 30-day in hospital mortality, 365-day mortality, unplanned readmission within 28 days of discharge, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

During the study period, 36,767 nonelective colorectal resections were performed in patients aged ≥ 70 years in England. Patients were classified into 3 age groups: A (70-75 years), B (76-80 years), and C (>80 years). Thirty-day mortality was 17.0%, 23.3%, and 31.0% in groups A, B, and C (p < 0.001). The overall 30-day medical complication rate was 33.7%, and the reoperation rate was 6.3%. Cardiac and respiratory complications were significantly higher in group C (22.2% and 18.2%, p < 0.001). Mortality in Group C was 51.2% at 1-year postsurgery. Advanced age was an independent determinant of mortality in risk-adjusted regression analyses.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Stage of disease at presentation, severity of complications, and cause of death cannot be ascertained from this database.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, half of all English patients aged over 80 years undergoing nonelective colorectal resection died within 1 year of surgery. Further research is required to identify perioperative and postdischarge strategies that may improve survival in this vulnerable cohort.

Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are often regarded as high-risk patients for major abdominal surgery because of a lack of functional reserve and associated medical comorbidities. The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to review the current data published regarding the differences in operative outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery in the elderly population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed. Studies that compared outcome following laparoscopic and open colorectal resections in the elderly (≥70) population were included. Primary outcomes were operative death, anastomotic leak, pneumonia, length of hospital stay, and return to bowel function. Secondary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative cardiac morbidity, ileus, and postoperative wound infection.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and pooled analysis demonstrate the safety and potential benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection in the elderly population. The latter include reduction in length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of postoperative pneumonia, time to return of normal bowel function, incidence of postoperative cardiac complications, and wound infections.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pooled analysis demonstrate the potential short-term advantages of laparoscopic colorectal resection in the elderly population. Further studies are required to examine the long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colorectal resections in the elderly population.

Short-term outcome following elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in octogenarians and nonagenarians

AIM

The 30-day outcome after laparoscopic resection for cancer in patients over the age of 80 years was studied.

METHOD

An electronic database was used to identify patients over 80 years who underwent laparoscopic bowel resection between December 2000 and October 2009 at three UK laparoscopic colorectal training units. Patients who required abdominoperineal excision of the rectum were excluded.

RESULTS

In all, 173 patients (80 men) of median age 84 (80-93) years were identified. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades were ASA 1, 14; ASA 2, 87; ASA 3, 68; and ASA 4, 4. Median body mass index was 26 (14-45) kg/m(2). Thirteen (7.5%) patients were converted to open surgery. The major causes for conversion were bleeding and adhesions. Thirty-three major complications occurred in 21 (12%) patients. Ten (5.8%) required readmission after discharge for complications giving a total of 17.8% of patients with complications. The median hospital stay was 5 (1-37) days. Three (1.7%) patients died within 30 days of surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that laparoscopic large bowel resection is safe and beneficial in a population over 80 years. It has low morbidity and mortality and a shortened hospital stay. Octogenarians should not be denied major laparoscopic bowel surgery based on age alone.

Impact of age on outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly - a developing country perspective

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and surgery is often the only definitive management option. The suitability of surgical candidates based on age alone has traditionally been a source of controversy. Surgical resection may be considered detrimental in the elderly solely on the basis of advanced age. Based on recent evidence suggesting that age alone is not a predictor of outcomes, Western societies are increasingly performing definitive procedures on the elderly. Such evidence is not available from our region. We aimed to determine whether age has an independent effect on complications after surgery for colorectal cancer in our population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgery for pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi between January 1999 and December 2008 was conducted. Using a cut-off of 70 years, patients were divided into two groups. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with clinically relevant variables to determine whether age had an independent and significant association with the outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 271 files were reviewed, of which 56 belonged to elderly patients (≥ 70 years). The gender ratio was equal in both groups. Elderly patients had a significantly higher comorbidity status, Charlson score and American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) class (all p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, factors associated with more complications were ASA status (95% CI = 1.30-6.25), preoperative perforation (95% CI = 1.94-48.0) and rectal tumors (95% CI = 1.21-5.34). Old age was significantly associated with systemic complications upon univariate analysis (p = 0.05), however, this association vanished upon multivariate analysis (p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

Older patients have more co-morbid conditions and higher ASA scores, but increasing age itself is not independently associated with complications after surgery for CRC. Therefore patient selection should focus on the clinical status and ASA class of the patient rather than age.

Outcome of colonic surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer

Introduction. Colonic cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies and most often occurs in patients aged 65 years or older. Aim. To evaluate the outcome of colonic surgery in the elderly in our hospital and to compare five-year survival rates between the younger and elderly patients. Methods. 207 consecutive patients underwent surgery for colon cancer. Patients were separated in patients younger than 75 and older than 75 years. Results. Elderly patients presented significantly more (P < .05) as a surgical emergency, had a longer duration of admission and were more often admitted to the ICU (P < .01). Also, elderly patients had significant more co-morbidities, especially cardiovascular pathology (P < .01). Post-operative complications were seen more often in the elderly, although no significant difference was seen in anastomotic leakage. The five-year survival rate in the younger group was 62% compared with 36% in the elderly (P < .05). DFS was 61% in the younger patients compared with 32% in the elderly (P < .05). Conclusion. Curative resection of colonic carcinoma in the elderly is well tolerated and age alone should not be an indication for less aggressive therapy. However, the type and number of co-morbidities influence post-operative mortality and morbidity.

Outcome of right colectomy for cancer in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest malignancies in the elderly and, as such, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus yet if age itself is a risk factor for adverse outcome after colectomy. The aims of the study were to evaluate the impact of age on operative results of right colectomy for cancer and to define factors that influence the postoperative mortality in octogenarians.

METHODS

Data of all patients who underwent right colectomy for colon cancer between January 2001 and December 2006 were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were 80 years and older and those who were less than 80 years old. Analysis included patients' demographics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, functional status, mode of presentation, stage of disease, length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 124 consecutive patients with right colon cancer were operated. Control group included 84 patients less than 80 year old. Study group included 40 patients 80 years or older. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, poor functional status and emergent surgery were independent factors for postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the outcome of elective right colectomy between elderly patients and their younger counterparts. Operative mortality of emergency surgery was significantly higher in octogenarians. Emergent setting and poor functional status are major risk factors for postoperative mortality.

The changing impact of age on colorectal cancer surgery. A trend analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the changing influence of age on the outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in a retrospective trend analysis.

METHODS

Data on 985 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were collected during 1975-1984 and 1995-2004. Variables and outcomes of patients aged < 65, 65-74, 75-84 and 85+ years were compared with intra- and interdecade analyses. Endpoints of the study were postoperative mortality, 5-year overall and cancer-related survivals.

RESULTS

The rate of elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery increased significantly from 1975-1984 to 1995-2004. Distribution of American Society of Anesthesiology score and cancer stage remained unchanged over time. The rate of palliative procedures decreased over time, most significantly in the older age groups. In 1995-2004 the palliation rate was similar across all age groups. The rate of emergency surgery also decreased, but it remained higher in older age groups. Operative mortality rate decreased over time across all age groups, but age-related differences were still observed in the 1995-2004 series. Cancer-related survival after curative surgery increased from 58% in 1975-1984 to 64% in 1995-2004 in 75+ years patients, while it increased from 56% to 78% in patients aged 74 years or younger.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with colorectal cancer benefited substantially from healthcare progress during the last 30 years. The reduction of palliative procedures and the decline in operative mortality document the efficacy of not restricting the access to radical surgery for these patients.

Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on short-term postoperative outcome in elderly patients.

METHODS

A series of 535 patients with colorectal disease who had been randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n=268) or open (n=267) resection was analyzed. A total of 201 patients (37.6 percent) were elderly (aged 70 years or older) and 334 patients (62.4 percent) were younger than aged 70 years. Follow-up for postoperative morbidity was performed for 30 days after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Elderly patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared with younger patients in both the laparoscopic and open groups (P=0.0001). In the open group, elderly patients had higher morbidity rate (37.5 vs. 23.9 percent; P=0.02) and longer length of hospital stay (13 vs. 10.6; P=0.007) compared with younger patients. In the laparoscopic group, morbidity rate (20.2 vs. 15.1 percent) and length of hospital stay (9.5 vs. 9.1) were similar in elderly and younger patients. In elderly patients, the laparoscopy-reduced morbidity rate (20.2 vs. 37.5 percent; P=0.01) and length of hospital stay (9.5 vs. 13; P=0.001) compared to the open approach. In younger patients, the advantages of the laparoscopic approach on morbidity rate (15.1 vs. 23.9 percent; P=0.06) and length of stay (9.1 vs. 10.6; P=0.004) were less pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy improved short-term postoperative outcome more in elderly than in younger patients. Advanced age was associated with higher morbidity and longer length of stay only in patients who underwent open colorectal surgery.

The United Kingdom National Bowel Cancer Project – Epidemiology and surgical risk in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the epidemiology and risk of surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were identified from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) bowel cancer database, comprising 47,455 patients treated over a 5-year period. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients aged <75 and those 75 or above. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay, abdominoperineal excision (APER) rates and lymph node harvest.

RESULTS

Elderly patients were likely to be female and have higher American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grade, while Dukes' stage was lower. They underwent surgery less often (81% versus 88%, p<0.001), but more frequently needed urgent or emergency procedures (p<0.001) and non-excisional surgery (7.7% versus 6.6%, p<0.001). Operative mortality was significantly higher for the older age group (10.6% versus 3.8%, p<0.001), and their median length-of-stay was 2 days longer (p<0.001). Mortality has improved over time for elderly patients with ASA grade III, and Dukes' stage A and D disease, but not for other subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in the demographic characteristics and operative risk-factors between under-75s, and those aged 75 or above exist. These variations are reflected in the inferior outcomes experienced by elderly patients.

Rectal cancer surgery in the elderly: analysis of consecutive 158 patients with stage III rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to establish a clear-cut indication for rectal surgery in elderly patients because of greater risk. We tried to clarify the factors associated with the short-term and long-term outcomes between elderly and younger patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We clarified the potential predictors of the cancer-related and disease-free survivals after surgery, the factors associated with the elderly, preoperative comorbid conditions, and postoperative complications in 158 patients with stage III rectal cancer who underwent surgery, including 33 elderly patients (>or=75 years) and 125 younger patients (<75 years).

RESULTS

An old age and macroscopic types 3 and 4 were independent poor prognostic factors of cancer-related survival, whereas the disease-free survival of the younger patients was not longer than for the elderly patients. Interestingly, the survival rate in the elderly patients with recurrence was shorter than that in the younger patients. Histopathological type except well differentiated and without chemotherapy were significant tumor characteristics associated with the elderly patients. On preoperative comorbid conditions, elderly patients have more cardiovascular diseases than younger patients, whereas there were no significant differences in the postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Strength of the adjuvant and intensive therapies after recurrence may contribute to gain long-term survival in the elderly rectal cancer patients.

Long-term outcome after operative intervention for rectal cancer in patients aged over 80 years: analysis of 9,501 patients

INTRODUCTION

Perceptions of poor outcome may detract caregivers from offering standard therapies to patients over 80 years who have been diagnosed with rectal cancer. We evaluate the effect of operative intervention on their survival.

METHODS

Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival for patients over 80 years with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer from 1993 to 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute were examined. Survival was determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients who underwent operation (Group A) were compared with those who did not undergo surgery (Group B). Fisher's exact, chi-squared, analysis of variance, and log-rank tests were used as appropriate, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 9,501 patients (19 percent) were aged older than 80 years. Mean age was 85 years, and median survival was 24 months. Stage of disease was unknown for 2,915 patients. Median survival was 58, 53, 39, 27, and 5 months for Stages 0 (n=163), I (n=1,878), II (n=1,796), III (n=1,536), and IV (n=1,213), respectively. A total of 6,900 patients (81 percent) underwent surgery. Median survival for operated patients was significantly longer for all stages (36 vs. 5 months, P < 0.00001), Stage 0 (60 vs. 7 months, P < 0.01), Stage I (55 vs. 11 months, P < 0.0001), Stage II (41 vs. 13 months, P < 0.0001), Stage III (28 vs. 14 months, P < 0.05), and Stage IV (8 vs. 3 months, P < 0.0001). For patients with rectal cancer, local therapy also significantly improved median survival compared with nonoperated patients (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative intervention provides sustained benefit in terms of survival to patients aged >80 years with rectal cancer at all stages who are assessed to be a good operative risk. Age older than 80 years should not detract surgeons from offering optimal therapy to good-risk patients.

Population-based assessment of the surgical management of locally advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines recommend multivisceral resection for patients with locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer because it reduces local recurrence and improves survival. However, this procedure can increase morbidity compared with standard resection and may not be practiced uniformly. We performed a population-based study to examine surgical practice and outcomes among patients with locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer in the United States.

METHODS

Patients who were 18 years or older and who had surgical resection for nonmetastatic, locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2002, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Logistic regression was used to examine patient, tumor, and geographic factors associated with multivisceral resection. Cumulative early mortality (i.e., at 1 and 6 months after diagnosis) and 5-year survival were obtained from Kaplan-Meier estimates; adjusted risks of death were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified 8380 patients who underwent surgical resection for locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer, of whom 33.3% were managed with multivisceral resection. Among colon cancer patients, younger age at diagnosis, female sex, SEER region, node negativity, and left-sided tumors were independently associated with having had a multivisceral resection. Among rectal cancer patients, younger age at diagnosis and female sex were positively and statistically significantly associated with multivisceral resection, whereas receipt of neoadjuvant radiation was inversely and statistically significantly associated with multivisceral resection. Compared with standard resection, multivisceral resection was associated with improved overall survival for patients with colon (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 0.96) and rectal (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.94) cancer, with no associated increase in early mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer did not receive a multivisceral resection. The geographic variation in the application of this procedure in patients with colon cancer suggests that local organizational structures and processes of care may play an important role in patient treatment and, therefore, prognosis.

Outcomes of surgery for mid and distal rectal cancer in the elderly

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the surgical strategies, operative results, and oncological outcomes of elderly patients who underwent curative resection for mid and distal rectal cancer. Comparison was made with patients of younger age.

STUDY DESIGN

Of the 612 patients who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer, 133 were older than 75 years of age. Comparisons were made between the young and elderly patients in the aspects of operative strategies, operative results, and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Resection resulting in a permanent end colostomy was performed in 96 patients (15.7%), and there was no difference between young and elderly patients. There was a female predominance in the elderly group. Elderly patients also had a higher incidence of comorbid medical diseases, especially cardiovascular and neurological diseases. The operative time, blood loss, and incidence of intraoperative complications did not differ in the two groups. However, significantly fewer elderly patients underwent adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.14%. There was no difference between the elderly patients and younger patients in hospital mortality (P = 0.178). The complication rates of the elderly and young patients were 36.8% and 30.1%, respectively (P = 0.141). Comparison between the individual complications in the elderly and young patients revealed significantly more cardiovascular complications in the elderly patients. With the median follow up of the surviving patients of 45.1 months, the overall 5-year survival of the elderly and younger groups was 47.7% and 70.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 75.4% and 67.5% in the young and elderly patients, respectively (P = 0.061).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative resection for mid and distal rectal cancer for the elderly can be performed safely with the same strategies of sphincter preservation used for younger patients. The postoperative complications and the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were similar to those of younger patients.

Prediction of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to develop a model for predicting postoperative mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This multicenter study was conducted by using routinely collected clinical data, assessing patients older than aged 80 years, with 30-day operative mortality as the primary end point. Data were collected from The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland database, encompassing 8,077 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients undergoing resectional surgery in 79 hospitals between April 2000 to March 2002, The Association of Coloproctology Malignant Bowel Obstruction Study, encompassing 1,046 patients with malignant bowel obstruction in 148 hospitals, between April 1998 to March 1999, and The Wales-Trent audit, encompassing 3,522 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients, between July 1992 to June 1993. A multilevel logistic regression model was developed to adjust for case-mix and to accommodate the variability of outcomes between the three study populations. The model was internally validated using a Bayesian resampling technique and tested using measures of discrimination, calibration, and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2,533 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, with a 30-day mortality of 15.6 percent. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: age (odds ratio for 85-90, 90-95, >95 vs. 80-85 = 1.1, 1.8, 2.9), American Society of Anesthesiology grade (odds ratio for Grade III, IV vs. I-II = 2.7, 6.1), operative urgency (odds ratio for emergency vs. elective = 1.9), no cancer excision vs. resection (odds ratio = 1.2), and metastatic disease (odds ratio for metastases vs. no metastases = 1.9). The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator curve = 0.732) and excellent agreement between observed and predicted outcomes during eight colorectal procedures (P = 0.885).

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly colorectal cancer model can accurately estimate 30-day mortality in patients older than aged 80 years undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Because the mortality can be considerable, this may have important implications when determining management for this group of patients.

The impact of the risk factor "age" on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management

The risks and benefits of surgery for colorectal cancer in old patients have not been unequivocally defined. The present investigation was carried out in 309 hospitals as a prospective multicenter study. In the period between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2001, a total of 19,080 patients were recruited for the study; 16,142 (84.6%) patients were younger than 80 years (<80) and 2932 (15.4%) were 80 years and older (> or =80). Significant differences between the age groups were observed for general postoperative complications (22.3% for <80 years; 33.9% for > or =80). Specific postoperative complications were identical in both groups. Overall, significantly elevated morbidity and mortality rates were found with increasing age (morbidity: 33.9% vs. 43.5%; mortality: 2.6% vs. 8.0%). The distribution of tumor stages revealed a significantly higher percentage of locally advanced tumors in the older age group (stage II: 28.0% vs. 34.4%). In contrast, no increase in metastasizing tumors was found in the older age group (stage IV: 17.4% vs. 14.1%). Logistic regression showed that, in concert with a number of other parameters, age is a significant influencing factor on postoperative morbidity and mortality. The increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality rates associated with aging is a result of the increase in general postoperative complications, in particular, pneumonia and cardiovascular complications. Age as such does not represent a contraindication for surgical treatment. The short-term outcome and quality of life are of overriding importance for the geriatric patient.

Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to define any benefits in terms of early outcome for laparoscopic colectomy in patients over 80 years old compared with open colectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer were matched to 61 open colectomy patients for gender, age, year of surgery, site of cancer, and comorbidity on admission. Independence status on admission and at discharge from the hospital was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean (standard deviation) age was 82.3 (3.5) years in the laparoscopy group and 83.1 (3.3) years in the open group. Conversion rate was 6.1 percent. Operative time was 49 minutes longer in the laparoscopy group (P = 0.001). The overall mortality rate was 2.4 percent. The morbidity rate was 21.5 percent in the laparoscopy group and 31.1 percent in the open group (P = 0.30). Patients in the laparoscopy group had a faster recovery of bowel function (P = 0.01) and a significant reduction of the mean length of hospital stay (9.8 vs. 12.9 days for the open group, P = 0.001). Laparoscopy allowed a better preservation of postoperative independence status compared with the that of the open group (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in octogenarians is safe and beneficial including preservation of postoperative independence and a reduction of length of hospital stay.

Colon resection in elderly patients: comparison of data of a single surgical department with collective data from the Czech Republic

Colorectal cancer is predominantly a disease of elderly people, since over 70% of cases occur in those aged 65 years or older. Clinicians have to frequently decide whether major surgery is justified in elderly patients with a limited life expectancy. Our retrospective study was aimed to compare outcomes of primary surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly patient population. The evaluated data were collected from the 1st Department of Surgery, Charles University, and from all over the Czech Republic. Patients were divided into three groups: the young-old (21-59 years), the older-old (60-69 years), and the oldest-old (>69 years) patients. In the collective data the youngest and the oldest groups differ significantly in the rate of early postoperative complications (12.3% versus 17.6%, p<0.001). The number of complications associated with the emergency procedures was twice as high compared to elective surgery in all groups (p<0.001). There was no correlation between age and length of hospital stay in the single surgery department. These data suggest that major oncology procedures may be undertaken in older patients in whom operative risk is reasonable, with acceptable rates of complications.

Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model

INTRODUCTION

Predictive models play a pivotal role in the provision of risk-adjusted, operative mortality rates. The purpose of the study was to describe the development of a dedicated prognostic index for quantifying operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from 5,034 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery in a single center from October 1976 to July 2002. Primary end point was 30-day operative mortality. A multilevel Bayesian logistic regression model was developed to adjust for case-mix and accommodate the variability of outcomes between surgeons. The model was internally validated (split-sample) and tested using measures of discrimination, calibration, and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

The patients' median age was 66 (range, 18-98) years. Operative mortality was 2.3 percent with no significant variability between surgeons or through time. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: age (odds ratio = 1.5 per 10-year increase), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (odds ratio for ASA II, III, IV-V vs. I = 2.6, 4.3, 6.8), TNM staging (odds ratio for Stage IV vs. I-III = 2.6), mode of surgery (odds ratio for urgent vs. nonurgent = 2.1) no-cancer resection vs. cancer resection (odds ratio = 4.5), and hematocrit level. The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.801) and excellent agreement between observed and model-predicted outcomes over ten major colorectal procedures (P = 0.191).

CONCLUSIONS

The colorectal cancer model provided an accurate means of estimating risk for individual patients in the preoperative setting. It has important implications in everyday practice, because it may be used as an adjunct in the process of informed consent and for monitoring surgical performance through time.

Evaluation of Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index as predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal carcinoma

The Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index (CACI) is a validated tool used to predict patient outcome based on comorbid medical conditions. We wanted to determine if the CACI would predict morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Records of 279 consecutive colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparotomy by a single surgical group between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed in a retrospective fashion for patient demographics, stage at diagnosis, operation, surgeon, perioperative complications, tumor characteristics, comorbid diseases, performance status, length of stay (LOS), disposition, and mortality. Using the preoperative history and physical, all patients were assigned a score for the CACI. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were recorded and graded to account for severity. The University Statistical Consulting Center and SPSS software were used to analyze the results. The patients were primarily white (97.1%) with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.2 and a median age of 72 years. AJCC stage at presentation was stage 0 (3.2%), stage I (28.3%), stage II (24.4%), stage III (24.4%), or stage IV (19.7%). Median LOS was 7.0 days. Perioperative mortality was 17 of 279 (6.1%), and overall mortality was 32.6% at a median follow-up of 18.5 months. Higher CACI scores and AJCC stage at presentation correlated with longer LOS and overall mortality. Only the CACI correlated with perioperative mortality and disposition. No correlation was observed with location of tumor, type of surgery, or surgeon. Patients with higher cumulative number of weighted comorbid conditions as indicated by the CACI are at higher risk for perioperative and overall mortality. This simple scoring system is also a significant predictor of disposition (home versus extended care facility) and LOS. The CACI can be a useful preoperative tool to assess and counsel patients undergoing surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Elevated Endothelin-1 Concentrations

AIM

Prognostic indicators from clinical, laboratory and pathological data of patients with colorectal cancer are essential to identify high-risk groups in whom adjuvant therapy could be beneficial. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a growth factor, has been associated with the development and spread fo solid tumours. This prospective study was performed to determine whiter preoperative plasma big ET-1 concentrations might be useful as a prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Overall, 65 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer confirmed by biopsy were include prospectively in this study from 1998 to 2001. Plasma samples from a peripheral vein were obtained prior to surgery. Univariant analysis of survival used age (less than or more than 70 years), gender, Dukes' stage (A/B vs C), tumour size (less than or more than 50 mm), vascular invasion, and plasma big ET-1 concentrations, and significant factors were then analysed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Three variables, age, Dukes' tumour stage and plasma big ET-1 concentration, and prognostic significance (p < 0.05). Factors associated with a poorer prognosis were age more than 70 years (p = 0.02), Dukes' C (p = 0.04) and plasma big ET-1 concentration more than 4.2 pg/mL (p = 0.02). The Cox regression model identified the same three variables as having independent prognostic value for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative plasma big ET-1 concentration may be useful in predicting overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Plasma big ET-1 concentrations may be useful in the selection of high-risk, lymph node-negative patients with colorectal cancer for adjuvant therapy.

Management of Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

The treatment of colorectal cancer has evolved dramatically over the last 15 years. Advances in surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have enabled oncologists to cure more patients and offer improved quality of life to patients not amenable to cure. Specific knowledge of colorectal cancer care of the elderly, while lagging behind the treatment of younger patients, is beginning to emerge. Informed by recent trials, the approach towards elderly patients is shifting towards more aggressive treatment and multimodal therapy. Surgeons are operating on the elderly with greater frequency, less operative mortality and greater success; 5-year survival following potentially curative surgery has risen from 50% to 67%.Research of adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer is enrolling more elderly patients, and with this has come an understanding of the role of chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of the elderly, used individually and within multi-drug regimens. This research offers insight into how the elderly respond to chemotherapy, informing clinicians on anticipated benefits and toxicities of treatment. Fluorouracil-based regimens, which have long been the standard adjuvant chemotherapy, have been shown to offer benefits to the elderly compared with those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (71% versus 64% 5-year survival), and to cause similar toxicities as seen in younger patients. The role of novel chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is also emerging, with studies finding that irinotecan, in combination with a fluorouracil-based regimen, can offer a further survival benefit of over 2 months compared with fluorouracil alone. While newer agents such as capecitabine, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed and tegafur/uracil (UFT) have been focused upon by clinical researchers, data on their use in the elderly remain unconvincing. Not only are we approaching a clearer understanding of the effectiveness of cancer care among the elderly, but research is also beginning to identify the cost effectiveness of both standard and emerging chemotherapeutic agents. Cost effectiveness of fluorouracil-based regimens, depending on delivery strategy, use of modulating agents and stage of cancer vary from US dollars 2000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to US dollars 20200 per QALY (1992 values). Irinotecan therapy has not been fully investigated from the perspective of cost effectiveness; the figure of US dollars 10000 per QALY (1998 values) for irinotecan monotherapy over fluorouracil regimens is likely an underestimate, while cost analysis of irinotecan and fluorouracil combination therapy has not yet been reported. Our understanding of cost effectiveness of other novel agents has lagged behind; further research on these agents is needed. Nonetheless, as the effects of these novel agents upon both outcomes and costs continue to be defined, both curative and palliative treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly patient will become more sophisticated and effective.

Elderly Patients in Surgical Workloads: A Population-Based Analysis

Elderly (80+ year old) individuals are the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. population. The objective of this study was to use population-based data to examine trends in the number of elderly undergoing major general, vascular, and cardiothoracic surgical procedures. California inpatient data from 1990–2000 was used to identify patients undergoing six procedures: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), colon resections, lung resections, and pancreatic resections. Despite comprising only 2.7 per cent of the California population, elderly patients were a significant percentage (6–22%) of the caseloads for the six procedures examined. For all six procedures, the percentage of patients that were elderly increased during the study period. The age-specific incidence rates for elderly individuals increased significantly for three of these procedures (CABG, CEA, lung resection), remained unchanged for two (AAA, pancreas resection), and decreased for one (colon resection). Elderly patients are a large and growing part of surgical caseloads. In the near future, the number of elderly individuals in the California state and the U.S. populations will increase dramatically (41% and 35% between 2000 and 2020). To provide the best quality of care, surgeons should embrace research, training, and educational opportunities regarding the treatment of elderly patients.

Rectal cancer surgery in patients more than 80 years of age

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to compare the prognosis for rectal cancer in patients more than 80 years old with that observed in younger patients.

METHODS

Patients operated on for a rectal adenocarcinoma, from 1980 to 1998, were divided into two groups: group 1 (>80 years, n = 92); group 2 (<80 years, n = 276).

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the two groups with regard to the sex ratio, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, the emergency presentation, and the curative operation rate. The operative mortality rate was 8% in group 1, 4% in group 2 (P = 0.26). The overall 5-year survival rate was 35% in group 1, 53% in group 2 (P = 0.0004). In patients operated on for cure, the cancer-specific 5-year survival rate was 50% in group 1, 59% in group 2 (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for rectal cancer in patients over 80 years is not significantly different from that of younger patients. Surgery should not be restricted on the basis of age.

Major colorectal cancer resection should not be denied to the elderly

AIMS

Adjuvant therapy after surgery for colorectal cancer is often denied to the elderly for various reasons. This study was to determine morbidity and mortality risk after surgery in the elderly and whether this is affected by adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively and entered on a database for all patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer between January 1994 and July 2000. A total of 304 patients were included, 65 aged 80 years and over.

RESULTS

There were 84 deaths, 21 (30%) in the over 80s, and 63 (26%) in the under 80s (P=0.51). The 'in-hospital' mortality was 10.1% in the over 80s and 3.8% in the under 80s (P=0.056). In the over 80s the colon was more affected than the rectum (P=0.002). The over 80s were less likely to be offered adjuvant therapy, 7.2% vs 42.1% (P<0.001). The 5 year survival (all-cause mortality) in the over 80s was 58.5% and 47.6% in the under 80s (P=0.25). Cox's regression analysis of all patients identified the following factors to be independently related to overall survival: age>80 years, post-operative leak, increasing Dukes stage and distant recurrence of disease.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated that surgery should not be denied to elderly patients with colorectal cancer as despite a higher post-operative morbidity and mortality rate and with the absence of adjuvant therapy, favourable long-term outcome can be achieved by resectional surgery alone.

Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of surgery for colorectal cancer depends on it being carried out safely, which allows most patients to return to productive lives, with an improved postoperative life expectancy, or at least one that is not diminished by the surgery. Because colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly people, we have examined how the outcomes of surgery in elderly patients differ from those in younger patients.

METHODS

We did a systematic review of published and aggregate data provided by investigators. Studies were identified by computerised and manual searches of published and unpublished reports, scanning references, and contacting investigators. Within each study, outcomes for patients aged 65-74 years, 75-84 years, and 85+ years were expressed in relation to those aged less than 65 years.

FINDINGS

From 28 independent studies, and a total of 34,194 patients, we found that elderly patients had an increased frequency of comorbid conditions, were more likely to present with later-stage disease and undergo emergency surgery, and less likely to have curative surgery than younger patients. The incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality increased progressively with advancing age. Overall survival was reduced in elderly patients, but for cancer specific survival age-related differences were much less striking.

INTERPRETATION

The relation between age and outcomes from colorectal cancer surgery is complex and may be confounded by differences in stage at presentation, tumour site, pre-existing comorbidities, and type of treatment received. However, selected elderly patients benefit from surgery since a large proportion survive for 2 or more years, irrespective of their age.

Cancer surgery in the elderly

The incidence of most cancers increases with age. Although the risk for surgery increases in elderly patients who have comorbidities, evaluations of risk can allow interventions that may decrease morbidity and mortality. Appropriate treatments should be offered to the elderly until studies demonstrate the elderly can safely be managed differently from younger patients. The elderly should not be denied adequate treatment simply because of age.

Adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in patients 70 years or older

PURPOSE

The surgical treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients (age 70 years or older) has improved, but data on adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy tolerability and benefits in this growing population remain scarce. Elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, and results for older patients are seldom reported separately.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a prospective database, we analyzed demographics, chemotherapy toxicity, response rates, failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients receiving chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The cutoff age was 70 years.

RESULTS

A total of 844 patients received first-line chemotherapy with various fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing regimens or raltitrexed for advanced disease, and 543 patients were administered adjuvant, protracted venous infusion 5-FU or bolus 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) chemotherapy. Of the 1,387 patients, 310 were 70 years or older. There was no difference in overall or severe (Common Toxicity Criteria III to IV) toxicity between the two age groups, with the exception of more frequent severe mucositis in older patients receiving adjuvant bolus 5-FU/FA. For patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, no difference in response rates (24% v 29%, P =.19) and median FFS (164 v 168 days) were detected when the elderly were compared with younger patients. Median OS was 292 days for the elderly group and 350 days for the younger patients (P =.04), and 1-year survival was 44% and 48%, respectively. The length of inpatient hospital stay was identical.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with good performance status tolerated adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy for CRC as well as did younger patients and had similar benefits from palliative chemotherapy.

Treatment of anal carcinoma in the elderly: feasibility and outcome of radical radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

For most cancers, information on treatment tolerance and results for elderly patients is quite limited. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and results of curative nonsurgical treatment of patients age 75 years or older with anal carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 1976 through June 1996, invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 58 patients age > or = 75 years. Curative treatment was administered to 47 patients (81%), of whom 42 received radiotherapy (RT), either used alone (21) or associated with concomitant chemotherapy (CT). RT was administered in two sequences, the first in which a median dose of 39.6 gray (Gy) was delivered with megavoltage photon beams, followed (after a median interval of 43 days) by a boost with either brachytherapy or external beam (median dose, 20 Gy). CT started on Day 1 and generally consisted of 1 cycle of mitomycin C (MMC; median dose, 9.5 mg/m2) and a 96-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; median dose, 600 mg/m2/day). The median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range, 5-163 months).

RESULTS

Of 40 patients (95%) who completed curative treatment, acute toxicity resulted in shortening of the planned first irradiation sequence in 2 patients (1 in each group) and an unplanned treatment break in 11 patients (4 in the RT group and 7 in the RT-CT group). Grade 2 and 3 acute reactions (RTOG) were observed in 43% and 54% of patients, respectively. Among all Grade 3 reactions, 32% occurred in the RT group and 68% in the RT-CT group. In patients receiving RT-CT, Grade 2-3 leukopenia was observed in 25% of patients, Grade 2-3 fatigue was observed in 58% of patients, and Grade 2 cardiac toxicity related to 5-FU occurred in 1 patient. At 5 years, the overall survival was 54% (49% and 59% for the RT and RT-CT groups, respectively, P = 0.28), and the actuarial local control rate was 78.5% (73% and 83% for the RT and RT-CT groups, respectively, P=0.36). Five patients presented with Grade 3-4 late complications, all of them in the RT-CT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The current series confirms the feasibility of sphincter-conserving treatment for elderly patients who present with anal carcinoma. Rates of acute or late complications appeared similar to those observed in younger patients, and the oncologic results were at least as favorable as those commonly reported.

Emergency resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided obstructing colorectal carcinoma in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Emergency colorectal surgery in the elderly has been associated with a high mortality rate. Although the current trend for the management of obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinoma favours primary resection and anastomosis, the safety and benefits of this approach in the elderly have not been studied.

METHODS

Some 57 elderly (aged more than 70 years) and 59 younger patients underwent emergency resection of an acutely obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinoma. Postoperative results in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The primary resection rate was 95 per cent in the elderly and 89 per cent in younger patients (P = 0.70), with a primary anastomosis rate of 84 per cent and 78 per cent respectively (P = 0.64). Elderly patients had a significantly higher incidence of premorbid risk factors and postoperative cardiorespiratory complications but no increase in surgical complications. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 6 per cent of the elderly and 4 per cent of younger patients (P = 0.65), and the hospital mortality rate was 9 and 5 per cent respectively (P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

Emergency resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided obstructing colorectal carcinoma can be performed with favourable outcome in the elderly and should be the treatment of choice in most elderly patients.

Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: results of current surgical management

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the risk of esophagectomy in the elderly compared with younger patients and to determine whether results of esophagectomy in the elderly have improved in recent years.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

An increased life expectancy has led to more elderly patients presenting with carcinoma of the esophagus in recent years. Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and advanced age is often considered a relative contraindication to esophagectomy despite advances in modern surgical practice.

METHODS

The perioperative outcome and long-term survival of 167 elderly patients (70 years or more) with esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus were compared with findings in 570 younger patients with esophagectomy in the period 1982 to 1996. Changes in perioperative outcome and survival between 1982 to 1989 and 1990 to 1996 were separately analyzed.

RESULTS

The resection rate in the elderly was 48% (167/345), lower than the 65% (570/874) resection rate in younger patients (p < 0.001). There were significantly more preoperative risk factors and postoperative medical complications in the elderly, but no significant differences were observed in surgical complications. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in the elderly (7.2%) than in younger patients (3.0%) (p = 0.02), but the hospital mortality rate was not significantly different in the elderly (18.0%) and younger age groups (14.4%) (p = 0.27). The long-term survival after curative resection in elderly patients was worse than younger patients (p = 0.01). However, when deaths from unrelated medical conditions were excluded from analysis, survival was similar between the two age groups (p = 0.23). A comparison of data for the periods 1982 to 1989 and 1990 to 1996 revealed that the resection rate had increased from 44% to 54% in the elderly, with significantly fewer postoperative complications and lower 30-day and hospital mortality rates. Long-term survival has also improved, although this has not reached a statistically significant level.

CONCLUSIONS

With current surgical management, esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus can be carried out with acceptable risk in the elderly, but intensive perioperative support is required. The improved results of esophagectomy in the elderly in recent years are attributed to increased experience and better perioperative management. Long-term survival was similar to that of younger patients, excluding deaths caused by unrelated medical conditions.

Curative surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term results and life expectancy in the elderly

PURPOSE

The long-term prognosis after curative surgery for colorectal cancer was evaluated in relation to age and life expectancy as a possible basis for assessing the risk to benefit ratios in the elderly.

METHODS

Data relating to 1,256 patients operated on from 1976 to 1994 were stored in a computer database prospectively from 1987. Patients were subdivided into four age groups (A = <60 years; B = 60-69; C = 70-79; D = > or =80). Distribution of general contraindications to curative surgery was examined. In the 869 patients who underwent curative treatment (A = 206; B = 256; C = 289; D = 118), distribution of tumor stage and elective/emergency surgery and the operative mortality rate were evaluated. Crude and age-corrected survival curves were calculated in 794 patients. The median crude survival of each group was related by gender and tumor stage to demographic life expectancy, assuming as "relative median survival index" the ratio between the two values.

RESULTS

General contraindications to curative surgery increased significantly with age. The operative mortality rate was higher in Group D than in Groups A, B, plus C over the total series (P < 0.001) and in both elective (P < 0.001) and emergency surgery (P < 0.05). Intergroup analysis of long-term survival rates showed significant differences between "crude" (P = 0.0057) but not age-corrected (P = 0.66) curves. The relative median survival index increased with age, up to approximately 1 in the local stages of Groups C and D.

CONCLUSIONS

To evaluate long-term results, elderly patients should be compared with unaffected, same-age subjects. Because the risks may be very high, the surgical policy in the elderly should be carefully weighed and related to life expectancy and actual results.