Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the results of restorative proctocolectomy

Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ('pouch surgery') provides a chance to avoid permanent ileostomy after proctocolectomy, but can be associated with poor outcomes. The relationship between hospital-level/surgeon factors (including volume) and outcomes after pouch surgery is of increasing interest given arguments for increasing centralization of these complex procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the literature describing the influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of studies reporting outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. The MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched (1978-2022). Data on outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, readmission, operative approach, reconstruction, postoperative parameters, and pouch-specific outcomes (failure), were extracted. Associations between hospital-level/surgeon factors and these outcomes were summarized. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022352851).

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies, describing 41 344 patients who underwent a pouch procedure, were included; 3 studies demonstrated higher rates of pouch failure in lower-volume centres, 4 studies demonstrated higher reconstruction rates in higher-volume centres, 2 studies reported an inverse association between annual hospital pouch volume and readmission rates, and 4 studies reported a significant association between complication rates and surgeon experience.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the growing body of evidence that supports centralization of pouch surgery to specialist high-volume inflammatory bowel disease units. Centralization of this technically demanding surgery that requires dedicated perioperative medical and nursing support should facilitate improved patient outcomes and help train the next generation of pouch surgeons.

MRI defecography of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-contributes little to the understanding of functional outcome

PURPOSE

Variability in functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is to a large extent unexplained. The aim of this study was to use MRI to evaluate the morphology, emptying pattern and other pathology that may explain differences in functional outcome between well-functioning and poorly functioning pouch patients. A secondary aim was to establish a reference of normal MRI findings in pelvic pouch patients.

METHODS

From a previous study, the best and worst functioning patients undergoing IPAA surgery between 2000 and 2013 had been identified and examined with manovolumetric tests (N = 47). The patients were invited to do a pelvic MRI investigating pouch morphology and emptying patterns, followed by a pouch endoscopy.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients underwent MRI examination. We found no significant morphological or dynamic differences between the well-functioning and poorly functioning pouch patients. There was no correlation between urge volume and the volume of the bony pelvis, and no correlation between emptying difficulties or leakage and dynamic MRI findings. Morphological MRI signs of inflammation were present in the majority of patients and were not correlated to histological signs of inflammation. Of the radiological signs of inflammation, only pouch wall thickness correlated to endoscopic pouchitis disease activity index scores.

CONCLUSION

It seems MRI does not increase the understanding of factors contributing to functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Unless there is a clinical suspicion of perianal/peripouch disease or pelvic sepsis, MRI does not add value as a diagnostic tool for pelvic pouch patients. Endoscopy remains the golden standard for diagnosing pouch inflammation.

Determinants of optimal bowel function in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis - physiological differences contributing to pouch function

BACKGROUND

Variability in functional outcome after ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is to a large extent unexplained. The aim of this study was to perform multiple physiological and biochemical tests including an endoscopic examination with histology on IPAA patients with well and poorly functioning pouches to determine factors, or combinations thereof, contributing to functional outcome.

METHODS

All patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing restorative proctocolectomy between 2000 and 2013 (N = 108) were interviewed using a pouch functioning score. The best and worst functioning quartiles were invited to undergo examination with a barostat measuring pouch volume at preset variable distension pressures, and a pouch endoscopy.

RESULTS

Forty five of 58 eligible patients agreed to participate. The most significant physiological parameter differing between the well and poorly functioning pouches was pouch volume at first sensation, urge and discomfort (p value <.001). Urge volumes were 213 (CI 171-256) ml for poorly and 352 (CI 305-401) ml for well functioning pouches. Pouchitis episodes were negatively correlated to function. The poorly functioning patients had a higher prevalence of histological signs of inflammation and hand-sewn anastomosis, and a longer remaining rectal cuff, however, nonsignificant. The pouch pressure at sensation thresholds did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch volume is the most dominant predictor of pouch function in this study. The present comprehensive study of a multitude of different factors that possibly could be contributing to functional outcome, failed to shed much further light on the functional variability among pouch patients. The pouch physiology remains to a large extent unexplained.

Development of a pouch functional score following restorative proctocolectomy

BACKGROUND

The influence of function on quality of life after primary restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) was determined with the aim of developing a pouch functional score.

METHODS

The Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) score was determined in 4013 patients undergoing RPC between 1977 and 2005 (mean(s.d.) follow-up 7.0(5.1) years; 13 105 follow-up episodes). Linear regression analysis was used to identify independent symptom domains of function as possible predictors of quality of life to develop and validate a pouch functional score.

RESULTS

CGQL scores at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were 85.0, 87.5, 87.5, 85.0 and 82.5 respectively (P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the symptom domains of stool frequency (24 h, nocturnal), urgency, incontinence and medication (antidiarrhoeals, antibiotics) were independently associated with CGQL (P < 0.001). The beta coefficients within each symptom domain were then adjusted to create a scale of 0-30 for practical use, the Pouch Functional Score (PFS), which correlated with the CGQL score (r(s) = -0.47, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stool frequency, urgency, incontinence and need for medication are major determinants of quality of life following RPC. The PFS demonstrated good correlation with CGQL.

A systematic stapling defect - a potential cause of 'anastomotic' leak after restorative proctocolectomy

OBJECTIVE

When constructing ileal-anal pouches with staples, a novel potential cause of anastomotic leak was recently identified at the apex of the pouch. This study was performed to assess this stapling defect.

METHOD

Careful inspection of the ileal pouch staple lines was made in eight consecutive pouch constructions. Pouch construction was further evaluated using pig small bowel.

RESULTS

When constructing ileal-anal pouches with staples, a novel potential cause of anastomotic leak was recently identified at the apex of the pouch. This defect was present in seven of eight consecutive ileo-anal J-pouches. It was repaired by direct suturing and no clinical or radiological leaks were identified in these patients. In the pig model, the same defect was found in five of five stapled constructions. It was avoiding in five of five cases by limiting the amount of bowel placed into the stapler on the initial firing.

CONCLUSION

This defect may be related to stapler design. It can be avoided by using less than the full staple line on the initial firing of the stapler or by using an alternative device. Surgeons creating ileal pouches using staplers, or indeed any use of this particular stapler, need to be aware of this potential for a defect in the staple line and should take steps to avoid the defect or repair it depending on the circumstances.

Intermittent torsion of a megapouch: report of a case

We report an unusual presentation of pouch dysfunction because of excessive pouch enlargement or "mega pouch" and probable torsion. The patient presented with abdominal pain that was positional. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography showed pouch anastomotic staples extending into the right upper quadrant. At operation, gross pouch enlargement with dilation of the afferent ileum was confirmed. Reduction pouch-plasty resulted in pain resolution and maintenance of satisfactory function.

Defecation mechanisms after anterior resection with J-pouch-anal and side-to-end anastomosis in dogs

BACKGROUND

Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis or colonic side-to-end anastomosis is the reconstruction of choice after low anterior resection. However, the mechanisms of defecation after both reconstruction forms are still speculative.

METHODS

Low anterior rectal resections were performed in 12 dogs with six colonic J-pouch-anal (pouch) and six coloanal side-to-end (SE) reconstructions. Four months postoperative stool frequency, intestinal transit time, and neorectal compliance were determined by radiography and barostat. Defecation mechanisms were evaluated radiographically during expulsion of artificial stool.

RESULTS

One dog with pouch reconstruction could not be evaluated due to an anastomotic leak, while the others had uncomplicated course. Spontaneous stool frequency was significantly increased with both reconstruction methods (control 2.0+/-0.9, pouch 2.7+/-1.2, SE 3.3+/-0.9 day; p<0.05). Intestinal transit time was significantly higher with pouch reconstruction due to storage of stool in the pouch and the descending colon compared to SE (control 760+/-82, pouch 592+/-97, SE 550+/-87 min; p<0.05). Compliance and functional capacity were higher in pouch than in side-to-end reconstructions (pouch 5.0+/-0.7 ml/mmHg, 124+/-23 ml; SE 2.7+/-0.3 ml/mmHg, 92+/-24 ml; p<0.05). During defecation, there were no contractions of the pouch detectable.

CONCLUSIONS

The colonic J-pouch reconstruction results in better functional outcome than side-to-end coloanal anastomosis. Our results show that pouch evacuation is passive and independent from pouch motility. The functional principle of the colonic J-pouch is not its reservoir function but a delay of colonic motility.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-vaginal fistula: a review

BACKGROUND

Fistula between an ileal pouch and the vagina is an uncommon complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Its optimal management has not been determined because of its low incidence.

METHODS

The literature describing such fistulas was reviewed to determine the incidence, cause, and appropriate investigation and repair of these lesions. A literature search was performed with the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. Through this search we located English-language articles from 1970 to 2003 on pouch-vaginal fistulas following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. References from these articles were searched manually for further references.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Pouch-vaginal fistula occurs in 6.3 (range, 3.3-15.8) percent of female patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Sepsis and technical factors are the most common contributors. It is the cause of considerable morbidity. Management depends on the level of the fistula, the amount of pelvic scar tissue, and previous treatments. An algorithm for surgical treatment is suggested.

Cumulative failure rate of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and quality of life after failure

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to calculate the cumulative occurrence of pouch failure among 486 patients who had undergone proctocolectomy and ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The other goal was to compare the quality of life in the failure group of 21 patients, the successful group, and the healthy population.

METHODS

Data were collected from patient histories, with the probability of pouch failure being calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with pouch failure and controls were sent a Short-Form 36-item quality-of-life questionnaire, and data were analyzed with paired -test.

RESULTS

The overall failure rate was 5.3 percent (26), including 24 pouch excisions and 2 early deaths (0.4 percent). Cumulative probabilities of pouch failure were 1, 5, and 7 percent at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Neither pouchitis, gender, nor diagnosis correlated with pouch failure, but fistula formation ( p< 0.001) did. Patients with failure had lower quality-of-life scores for physical function (p < 0.02), social function ( p< 0.04), energy ( p< 0.02), and physical role function ( < 0.03) than the healthy population. Scores for physical function ( p< 0.01), energy ( p< 0.01), and physical role function ( p< 0.05) were also lower than those of control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common cause of pouch failure is fistula, whereas pouch excision is rarely caused by pouchitis. The impaired quality of life of patients in the failure group was caused by impairment of physical function and restrictions in social life.

How does pouch construction for a final diagnosis of Crohn's disease compare with ileoproctostomy for established Crohn's proctocolitis?

PURPOSE

There is a difference of opinion concerning the role of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in Crohn's disease, even in the absence of small-bowel or perianal disease. One view is that ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should never be entertained, the other is that ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, like ileoproctostomy, can be justified sometimes, because it allows young people a period of stoma-free life. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to contrast it with ileoproctostomy in patients with Crohn's disease without small-bowel or perianal disease.

METHODS

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed in 23 patients with Crohn's disease (12 of whom had evidence of Crohn's disease at the time of operation and 11 who were eventually found to have Crohn's disease as a result of complications) and ileoproctostomy in 35. Patients were matched for age, gender, follow-up, and medication, but all ileoproctostomy cases had relative rectal sparing. Thus, the groups were not comparable and the reasons for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileoproctostomy were therefore quite different.

RESULTS

The outcome in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at a mean follow-up of 10.2 years was pouch excision, 11 (47.8 percent); proximal stoma, 1 (4.3 percent; patient preference); average small-bowel resection, 65 cm; persistent perineal sinus, 8 of 11 having pouch excision (73 percent); and mean time in hospital, 37 (range, 8-108) days. Of those in circuit having ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 12), 24-hour bowel frequency was 6, with no incontinence or urgency, but 6 (50 percent) were on medication. When ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was done for Crohn's disease in the resection specimen, only 4 of 12 (33 percent) were excised compared with 7 of 11 (64 percent) in whom the diagnosis was made as a result of complications. The outcome in ileoproctostomy at a mean follow-up of 10.9 years was rectal excision in 3 (8 percent), proximal stoma in 1 (3 percent), average small-bowel resection was 15 cm, persistent perineal sinus in 1 (3 percent), and time in hospital was 21 (range, 8-36) days. Of those in circuit (n = 32), 24-hour bowel frequency was 5, 2 had incontinence, 3 had urgency, and 12 (36 percent) were taking medication.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the overall outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is inferior to that of ileoproctostomy, especially if Crohn's disease was diagnosed as a result of complications. Nevertheless, the functional results of those with a successful outcome are comparable.

Ursodeoxycholic acid has no influence on function after restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Poor pouch function is associated with impaired bile acid absorption and increased faecal loss of bile acids. Bile acid replacement therapy might therefore be of clinical benefit, provided that diarrhoea is not aggravated by therapy.

AIM

To investigate the role of exogenous bile acid therapy in patients with poor pouch function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty ulcerative colitis patients with poor pouch function (score > 4 on a 12-point score) were recruited for inclusion to a prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (10 mg/kg per day in two divided doses for 1 month).

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in the functional score or bowel frequency following treatment irrespective of whether the active treatment was given before or after placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that ursodeoxycholic acid given over 4 weeks had no influence on functional score or bowel frequency after restorative proctocolectomy for U.C.

Restorative proctocolectomy for distal proctocolitis

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy (RP) is usually the surgical treatment of choice for severe ulcerative colitis, but patients with distal disease (rectosigmoid only) are frequently denied operation on the grounds that they are not systemically ill. Nevertheless, they may continue to have high frequency, low volume diarrhoea with severe urgency and bleeding, despite medical therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcome of RP in `distal disease' compared with `more extensive' disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The results of all patients having RP for ulcerative colitis between February 1983 and February 1997 were reviewed. We excluded patients later found to have Crohn's disease.

RESULTS

RP was used for 34 with `distal' disease compared with 134 with `more extensive' disease. Pre-operative steroids were used in 9% of the `distal' group compared with 34% in the `more extensive' group. Anastomotic leaks and pelvic sepsis occurred in 3% and 9%, respectively, in the `distal' group compared with 13% and 17% in the `more extensive' group, but these differences were not statistically significant. Pre-operative steroids significantly influenced anastomotic leaks 22% vs 5% (P = 0.006). Pouch-related fistulas occurred in 12% of the `distal' group compared with 15% in the remainder. Pouchitis occurred in 44% of the `distal' group: 44% compared with 33% in the remainder. Pouch failure occurred in 3% in `distal' compared with 15% in those with `more extensive' disease.

CONCLUSION

These results imply that RP has a role in the treatment of intractable `distal' colitis, that morbidity is low and urgency is usually eliminated.

Efficacy of the straight endorectal pull-through in the management of familial adenomatous polyposis--a 16-year experience

From 1979 to 1995, 27 patients who had familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were treated at the authors' institution. Most patients (n = 23) presented as a result of a previous family history of FAP. Eighteen patients presented with symptomatic colonic disease that included bloody stools (n = 14), diarrhea (n = 10), and abdominal pain (n = 6). Treatment consisted of a total colectomy, rectal mucosectomy, and straight endorectal pull-through (ERPT) in 26 of 27 patients. One patient preferred to undergo an ileoanal J pouch reconstruction. A temporary diverting loop ileostomy was performed in 25 patients and closed at an average of 100 days after the ERPT. Follow-up has been achieved in 100% of the patients and ranges from 6 to 182 months with an average of 48 months. Postoperative complications included partial bowel obstruction (two patients, one requiring enterolysis); and mild pouchitis (one patient). Two of the 27 patients required proctectomy and permanent ileostomy procedures, one for rectal cancer that was present microscopically in the initial rectal specimen from the ERPT and the other because of recurrent anastomotic complications. No patient required revision of the straight pull-through to a pouch or takedown of the pull-through as a result of persistent diarrhea or dissatisfaction. All of the patients are continent, and 80% deny any soiling during bouts of gastroenteritis. The mean number of bowel movements reported was 10 per day at the first postoperative clinic visit with a gradual decreased to six per day after 2 years. Initial use of bulking (62%) and antimotility agents (88%) decreased significantly over the course of follow-up to 29% and 67%, respectively at the most recent follow-up (average, 48 months) of each patient. Pelvic sepsis, which occurs in 8% of most series of patients who have pouches, did not occur in any of our patients. Pouchitis, a common complication with pouches (23%), occurred in only one of the patients and was mild and easily treated medically. This series demonstrates that total colectomy with rectal mucosectomy and straight ERPT eliminates the risk of colorectal cancer and achieves continence with a low complication rate and excellent functional results and patient satisfaction.

Vaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy

Vaginal fistula (VF) is a devastating complication following restorative proctocolectomy.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to examine the perioperative factors influencing the outcome and management of vaginal fistula.

METHOD

Between October 1983 and September 1994, 526 women underwent restorative proctocolectomy. Nineteen develop VF (3.6 percent), and six were referred from other institutions with this complication. These 25 women were followed for a minimum of nine months.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis was made in 23 of the patients with VF (92 percent), and indeterminate colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis was determined in the rest of the patients. Postoperatively, 12 of the 23 women (52 percent) with a preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis had clinical/pathologic findings of Crohn's disease, and 1 woman was reclassified as having indeterminate colitis. Postoperative pelvic sepsis was significantly higher in women with VF than in those without VF (26.3 vs. 6.3 percent; P = 0.003). Median time until occurrence of VF following loop ileostomy closure was later for women with delayed findings of Crohn's disease at 16.5 (range, <1-72) months, compared with women without Crohn's disease at 0.5 (range, <1-67) months (P < 0.05). Of the 163 women with handsewn anastomosis performed at our institution, 12 developed VF (7.4 percent). In contrast, 7 of the 363 patients with stapled anastomosis had VF (1.9 percent; P = 0.003). Site of VF was found at the anastomosis in 12 patients, below in 12 patients, and above in 1 patient. Presence of Crohn's disease and anastomotic technique did not influence the site of VF. Initial management of VF consisted of transanal repair in 20 patients (advancement flap, 12; direct repair, 6; and neoileoanal anastomosis, 2), seton in 1 patient, transabdominal approach in 1 patient, transvaginal in 1 patient, observation in 1 patient, and pouch excision in 1 patient. Of the 13 women without Crohn's disease, 12 had transanal repair (10 healed, 1 had recurrence, and 1 had pouch excision), and 1 had successfully repair with transabdominal technique, for an overall success rate of 84.6 percent. Of the 12 women with VF and delayed findings of Crohn's disease, transanal repair was performed on 9, 1 had pouch excision without repair, 1 had seton placement and pouch excision, and 1 underwent observation. Transanal technique of repair in women with Crohn's disease successfully healed three women (33.3 percent). Overall, of the 12 women with delayed findings of Crohn's disease, 6 had pouch excision, 3 had recurrences, and 3 healed.

CONCLUSION

VF is an uncommon complication following restorative proctocolectomy and is associated with a high incidence of pelvic sepsis and handsewn anastomosis. Late presentation of VF is more common with Crohn's disease and is associated with a poor prognosis and pouch salvage rate. Transanal techniques are an effective means of VF repair.

Pouch salvage. Long-term outcome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of pouch salvage operations and the factors that may influence successful reconstructions.

METHODS

This retrospective review includes data from 198 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy at a single institution during an 11-year period. All patients who had undergone attempted pouch salvage and who still had a pouch in situ were reviewed by both postal questionnaire and at interview in the outpatients clinic.

RESULTS

Of 198 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 27 (13.6 percent) presented with pouch-specific complications requiring pouch salvage. A further five patients requiring pouch salvage were referred from other centers. Of 32 patients who underwent attempted pouch salvage, 16 (50 percent) had a successful outcome, 12 (37.5 percent) had pouch excision, and 3 (9 percent) are still defunctioned. There was one death (3 percent) in this series. Pelvic sepsis was a major cause of pouch failure, being present in 50 percent (8/16) of failed salvage procedures, and accounting for 58 percent (7/12) of pouch excisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery for major complications following ileoanal pouch construction is worthwhile in the absence of major pelvic sepsis. Overall success rate is 50 percent, and these results may be acceptable to highly motivated patients.

What happens to a pelvic pouch when a fistula develops?

PURPOSE

The aim of this article is to determine the outcome of the pelvic pouch after the occurrence of a fistula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1983 to 1995, 1,040 pelvic pouch surgeries were done at our institution. We reviewed the records of all patients with pouch-related fistulas. Data were collected from chart reviews and our pouch registry.

RESULTS

Among 59 patients (22 males) with fistulas, mean age was 33 (range, 19-57) years. Preoperative diagnosis was mucosal ulcerative colitis (n = 52), indeterminate colitis (n = 6), and familial polyposis (n = 1). Site of fistulas included pouch/vaginal (n = 24), pouch/ cutaneous (n = 11), pouch/perineal (n = 16), and pouch/ presacral (n = 8). Postoperative diagnosis was mucosal ulcerative colitis (n = 40), Crohn's disease (n = 14), indeterminate colitis (n = 4), and familial polyposis (n = 1). One hundred eleven (range, 1-7) surgeries for treatment were performed. At a mean follow-up of 26 (range, 1-121) months, 19 pouches (32 percent) had been excised, 34 patients had functioning pouches and no fistula, 5 patients had a closed fistula but refused ileostomy closure, and 1-patient had died of unrelated causes (but the fistula was closed). Pouch type and preoperative diagnosis did not statistically affect pouch failure rates (P = 0.43 and 0.10. respectively).

CONCLUSION

Successful treatment of fistula from a pelvic pouch can be achieved in more than 60 percent of patients. However, multiple procedures may be needed for a successful outcome. Ultimately, 32 percent had their pouches excised.

Should older patients undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a technically demanding, lengthy procedure with substantial associated morbidity. Some have suggested that this procedure should not be performed in older patients. This study was conducted to evaluate whether older patients have a poorer functional outcome and higher complication rate than younger patients who undergo IPAA.

METHODS

The 455 patients who have undergone IPAA at this institution were stratified according to age (< 55 versus > 55) to compare functional outcome and complication rates. The data were prospectively collected. The groups included 32 patients > 55 (7%) and 423 patients < 55. Comparisons were made with regard to stool frequency, incontinence rates, post-IPAA complications, postileostomy closure complications, and results 12 months postileostomy closure.

RESULTS

Preoperative anal sphincter resting and squeeze pressures were significantly lower in the > 55 group. Most complication rates were similar after IPAA except dehydration rates, which were higher in the older patients than the younger ones (27% versus 11%, respectively). Pre-ileostomy closure anal sphincter resting and squeeze pressures were not significantly lower in patients older than 55. Twenty-four hour daytime and nighttime stool frequencies were significantly higher in the > 55 group, as were daytime and nighttime stool incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Although functional outcome is poorer and some complications are higher in the > 55 group, the procedure can be safely performed with acceptable results and is greatly preferred by this population over permanent ileostomy.

Comparison of surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis versus Brooke ileostomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the operative risks, operative complications, and late outcome of two homogeneous groups of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) who underwent either Brooke ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1970 and 1990, 72 patients with CUC and PSC underwent proctocolectomy with either Brooke ileostomy (group I; N = 32) or IPAA (group II; N = 40). Postoperative data included operative mortality, need for blood transfusion, general postoperative complications, liver-related complications, and proctocolectomy-related complications.

RESULTS

Eight group I patients and nine group II patients had a total of 12 and 11 general complications, respectively. Liver-related complications were diagnosed in 16% and 10% of group I and group II patients, respectively. Proctocolectomy-specific complications occurred in 34% of group I and 20% of group II patients. The overall need for blood transfusion was 94% in group I and 47% in group II (P < 0.001). The cumulative probability of proctocolectomy-related complications at 5 years was 23% for group I and 64% for group II patients (P < 0.002). The difference, however, was primarily due to the high frequency of pouchitis after IPAA, estimated at 57% at 4 years. The cumulative 5-year risk of liver-related complications was 37% and 28% for group I and group II, respectively. Peristomal varices and bleeding occurred in eight group I patients but in none of group II.

CONCLUSION

Because IPAA avoids bleeding problems, it is the surgical treatment of choice in patients with PSC and CUC.

Anal transitional zone and columnar cuff in restorative proctocolectomy

The popularity of double stapling the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis probably owes more to the technical ease it brings than to histological considerations or functional results. It is preservation of a 'columnar cuff' of mucosa, rather than the restricted site of the anal transitional zone, that should be the focus of research with respect to long-term risk of malignancy and inflammatory complications. If cancer is present in colon that has been removed for ulcerative colitis, there is a 25 per cent incidence of dysplasia in the columnar cuff in the short term. In other circumstances, those who are spared from carcinoma by colectomy are likely to have a similar risk of developing dysplastic change in the columnar cuff with longer follow-up. Double stapling the pouch-anal anastomosis and preserving the anal canal mucosa improves function, but long-term surveillance of the columnar cuff is then required, including biopsies.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a ten-year experience

BACKGROUND

The choice between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in the treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis remains controversial. The aims of this study were to assess our 10-year experience with proctocolectomy, endoanal mucosectomy, construction of an ileal reservoir pouch, and IPAA in a series of 171 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and to compare the functional results after IPAA with those after IRA.

METHODS

Data from patients treated by IPAA at one institution were prospectively accumulated from October 1983 to October 1993. Medical records of 171 consecutive patients were studied regarding morbidity and functional results. These functional results were compared with those of a series of 23 patients who underwent IRA at the same institution.

RESULTS

One patient (0.6%) died after operation. Sixty-two patients (36%) had concomitant colorectal carcinoma, 36 of which tumors were invasive (15 stage A, 13 stage B, and 8 stage C). Forty-six patients (27%) had at least one postoperative complication, with 14 patients requiring reoperation (8%). Twenty-six patients (15%) had obstruction. Seven patients (4%) had pelvic sepsis, and one had transient impotence (0.6%). Only two patients (1%) had a typical episode of pouchitis. The mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 3 to 100 months); 101 patients were monitored for more than 1 year. Little difference was noted between bowel function after IRA and that after IPAA. The mean daytime stool frequency after IPAA was 4.2 with 26% of patients having an average of 1 bowel movement at nighttime, compared with a stool frequency of 3.0 and 13% of patients having night evacuation after IRA. Daytime continence was normal for 98% of patients after IPAA and for all the patients after IRA. Nighttime continence was normal in 96% and 98% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and functional results after IPAA for familial adenomatous polyposis do not differ from those reported after IRA. For this reason and because of the risk of rectal cancer after ileorectal anastomosis, IPAA with endoanal mucosectomy is our first choice in the treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Results from pouch salvage

Over an 11-year period, 17 salvage procedures were performed on a failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis carried out for ulcerative colitis from a series of 157 patients. Ten pouches were saved, four excised and three defunctioned. Salvage procedures included five operations for fistulas (three of five successful), six reoperations on the ileoanal anastomosis (five of six successful), three new pouches after previous pouch excision (all failed), and three miscellaneous: excision of an efferent limb (successful), pouchpexy for a pouch prolapse (successful) and postanal repair for incontinence (failed). Pouch salvage may be successful in the motivated patient who wishes to avoid a permanent ileostomy.

The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch

A new method for allowing stool passage into the pelvic pouch before ileostomy closure to verify the defecation state and diminish stool frequency is reported herein. This was accomplished by fitting an ileostomy connector connecting the proximal and distal openings of the diverting loop stoma. The ileostomy connector was initially in place for 6 h a day, the length of time being gradually increased until it was able to be left in for 24 h a day over a 3-month period. The calculated daily frequency of stools decreased from 24 to 6 or 7 times, and the mean daily frequency immediately after ileostomy closure was 6.5 times. Physiological study also showed an improvement, with squeeze pressure increasing from 35 cmH2O to 116 cmH2O and the maximum tolerated volume increasing from 35 ml before, to 90 ml 3 months following the use of an ileostomy connector. Thus, we conclude that an ileostomy connector may be useful to predict postoperative functional outcome and its complications, and to diminish the frequency of defecation before ileostomy closure in patients with a covering loop stoma.

Harry E. Bacon Oration. Comparison of the functional results of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis between the J and W configuration ileal pouches with sutured ileoanal anastomosis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare function of patients who had undergone reconstruction following proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis using the J or W configuration ileoanal pouch.

METHODS

Of 126 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy between January 1981 and March 1993, 101 had surgery for ulcerative colitis. Eighty-seven of these patients were available for review by personal or postal interview. All operative procedures were performed by one surgeon. The group comprised 35 W-pouches and 52 J-pouches.

RESULTS

More patients with a J-pouch had a stool frequency of greater than 8 per 24 hours (P = 0.044), and they were also more likely to use a perineal pad (P = 0.019). No difference in the rates of nocturnal stool frequency, fecal incontinence, or use of constipating agents between the two pouch designs was found. Significantly more patients with a J-pouch have had episodes of pouchitis (P = 0.001). Of the total patient group 91.9 percent felt that restorative proctocolectomy had improved their quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Minor differences in the function of the W configuration ileoanal pouch and the J configuration ileoanal pouch are demonstrated in this study.

Bile acid absorption from ileoanal pouches using enema scintigraphy

It is unclear whether bile acid absorption is affected by ileoanal pouch construction. Bile acid absorption was measured in the abdomen of 16 patients with pouches (nine with good and seven with poor pouch function based on a clinical score) and in six patients with an end ileostomy using a radiolabelled synthetic bile acid (75SeHCAT) enema and dynamic scintigraphy. The median (interquartile range) 75SeHCAT absorption was 81 (79-87) per cent in patients with ileostomy, 46 (43-53) per cent in patients having well functioning pouches, and 24 (18-38) per cent in the group with poor pouch function (P < 0.01). Log transformation of the absorption curves revealed a two-component uptake (fast component t1/2 = 1.4-7.2 min; slow component t1/2 = 16-144 min) in all patients with ileostomy, in eight of nine patients with pouches with good function, and in one of seven patients with a poorly functioning pouch (P < 0.05); in the other six patients with poorly functioning pouches, only the slow component of absorption was present. This test showed significantly reduced bile acid absorption in patients with an ileoanal pouch and gave an objective discrimination between well and poorly functioning pouches.

Randomized trial to determine the optimum level of pouch-anal anastomosis in stapled restorative proctocolectomy

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to identify the optimum level of stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHOD

A prospective, randomized trial was completed to compare double-stapled ileoanal anastomosis placed at the top of anal columns (high, n = 26) with anastomosis at the dentate line (low, n = 21).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between operations (high, n = 7, vs. low, n = 8; P < 0.21). Pouch-anal functional score (scale 0-12; 0 = excellent, 12 = poor) was significantly better in the high anastomosis group (median (range): 2 (1-9) vs. 5.5 (1-12); P < 0.05). Incontinence occurred in only two patients randomized to high anastomosis compared with six in the low anastomosis group. Nocturnal soiling was reported in three patients after high anastomosis and in six patients after dentate line anastomosis. Both operations caused a significant but comparable reduction of maximum and resting pressure (31 percent after high anastomosis (P < 0.05); 23 percent after low anastomosis (P < 0.05)). However, a significant fall in functional length of the anal canal was only seen after a low pouch-anal anastomosis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Stapled pouch-anal anastomosis at the top of anal columns gives better functional results compared with a stapled anastomosis at the dentate line.

Clinical and physiological aspects of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice for severe chronic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis coli because the entire colonic mucosa is removed while anal function can be preserved and the necessity for permanent ileostomy is eliminated. Long-term functional results are generally gratifying, as defecation frequency and degree of incontinence are acceptable in most patients. Pouchitis, however, a non-specific inflammation of the ileal reservoir, is a major long-term complication occurring in a considerable number of patients. The etiology of pouchitis is unknown. Since pouchitis occurs more frequently or even exclusively in ulcerative colitis patients it is assumed that pouchitis is a novel manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease. However, bacterial overgrowth in the ileal pouch may also play a pathogenetic role. Chronic inflammation and villous atrophy of varying severity is found in virtually all pouches. Acute inflammatory changes and ulceration are associated with pouchitis.

Eversion of the rectum. A simplified technical approach to ileoanal anastomosis

Eversion of the rectum allows complete excision of the rectum. Here, we describe a modification of the stapling technique of ileoanal anastomosis, which leads to a safer anastomosis.

Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone

We assessed the outcome of stapled ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis with intersphincteric resection of the anal transition zone in 83 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 71) or familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 12). There was no postoperative mortality. Two patients (2.4%) required permanent ileostomy for manifestation of unsuspected Crohn's disease. Major postoperative complications consisted of pelvic sepsis, anastomotic leakage, and pancreatitis with 3.6% each. Both, frequency of bowel movements and degree of continence improved with time. Two years after takedown of the diverting ileostomy 45 patients with ulcerative colitis and 12 with familial adenomatous polyposis were assessed with a frequency of bowel movements of 5.6 +/- 2 and 3.2 +/- 1 per 24 h, respectively (P < 0.05). At this time none of them had major daytime or nighttime incontinence. Minor incontinence was reported by 9% and 14% of the patients with ulcerative colitis during day-time and night-time, respectively. The patients with familial adenomatous polyposis demonstrated better results, without day-time seepage and intermittent nocturnal seepage in only 9%. It is concluded that direct ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis is a safe procedure with excellent functional results for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Histological assessment of the distal 'doughnut' in patients undergoing stapled restorative proctocolectomy with high or low anal transection

A non-randomized prospective study of 38 patients, 32 with ulcerative colitis and six with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), who underwent high or low anal transection during stapled restorative proctocolectomy was undertaken. The median (range) height of the staple line 6 months after operation was 5.2 (3.2-6.0) cm after high transection compared with 2.9 (1.8-3.6) cm after low transection. Nineteen of 20 patients after high anal transection had columnar epithelium in the distal 'doughnut' versus 16 of 18 after low transection. Active colitis was present in 12 of 19 'doughnuts' in patients with high anal transection and columnar mucosa and in seven of 16 after low transection. Nine patients (high transection two, low transection seven; P < 0.05) had striated muscle in the stapled distal 'doughnut'. Dysplasia was found in the resected colon in one patient with ulcerative colitis and adenocarcinoma in two colectomy specimens (ulcerative colitis, one; FAP, one). No dysplasia or carcinoma was seen in any of the 'doughnuts' from patients with ulcerative colitis. Four patients with FAP (high transection, two; low transection, two) had microadenoma in the distal 'doughnut'. Despite attempts to place a stapled pouch-anal anastomosis below the anal transition zone, it was not possible to remove columnar mucosa completely from the remaining anal canal in most patients (16 of 18). High anal transection and pouch-anal anastomosis should be the preferred option in restorative proctocolectomy, as a dentate-line anastomosis may not fully eliminate columnar epithelium and may involve resection of some of the external sphincter.

Restorative proctocolectomy in elective and emergency cases of ulcerative colitis

A consecutive series of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis was reviewed to determine whether an emergency restorative proctocolectomy procedure leads to a higher morbidity, more especially anastomotic leakage. Severity of illness and nature of surgery were divided in two categories: (1) no acute disease and elective surgery (18 patients), (2) acute disease requiring emergency surgery either immediately or within one week of admission (12 patients). Morbidity after elective surgery was 27% and after emergency surgery 66% (P < 0.06). Pouch-anal leakage occurred in 11% and 41% respectively (P = 0.08). Five risk factors significantly influenced the leak rate including preoperative white blood cell count > 10,000/microliter (P < 0.02), urgent nature of surgery (P < 0.02), the combination of leucocytosis and urgent nature of surgery (P = 0.02), the combination of leucocytosis and preoperative corticosteroid dose equivalent to > or = 200 mg hydrocortisone/24 h (P = 0.006), postoperative pelvic haematoma (P < 0.05). In conclusion, restorative proctocolectomy is contraindicated in emergency circumstances, especially in patients with signs of sepsis on a high corticosteroid dose. To reduce operative risk and number of procedures required, patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis should be referred for restorative proctocolectomy while being in remission.

Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results, however remain undefined; the major concern is that function may deteriorate.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess functional outcome in a subgroup of patients who have an IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis for > 10 years.

METHODS

Among 1400 IPAA patients, 75 consecutive subjects (31 females and 44 males; median age 31 at operation) were identified who had the procedure prior to 1982. All patients had functional results recorded 1 year and 10 years following ileostomy closure.

RESULTS

There were four deaths during the follow-up period; none were pouch related. Two patients refused ileostomy closure. Of the remaining 69 patients, there were 8 (11 percent) failures, leaving 61 subjects available for study. Stool frequency (7 +/- 3, mean +/- SD) remained unchanged. Of the 50 subjects with initially excellent daytime continence, 39 (78 percent) remained the same, 10 (20 percent) developed minor incontinence, and 1 developed poor control after 10 years. Four of 10 subjects (40 percent) with initial minor daytime incontinence remained unchanged, 4 (40 percent) improved, and 2 (20 percent) worsened. The one subject with poor control at one year was unchanged. Nocturnal fecal spotting increased over the 10-year period but not significantly (38 percent vs. 52 percent; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

After IPAA, functional results in terms of stool frequency and rate of fecal incontinence did not deteriorate with time.

[Animal experiment studies of treatment of benign anastomotic stenosis of the colorectal area by electro-incision and balloon dilatation]

In an experimental study the significance of local electroincision and pressure in endoscopic dilatation therapy of benign colorectal anastomotic stenosis was investigated. A benign anastomotic stenosis was induced in the proximal part of the rectum in 21 pigs and was quantified and classified 12 weeks postoperatively using the stenosis index of McAdam. All stenotic anastomoses were dilated using electroincision (two incisions versus four) and balloon dilatation (230 mmHg versus 460 mmHg). Neither perforation nor severe bleeding occurred in any of the animals. At 24 weeks after the operation the anastomoses were restaged. We found significantly better results after four incisions than after two. After multiple incisions the dilation pressure was of secondary importance. Combined therapy with multiple incisions and balloon dilatation is a safe procedure yielding good results even with low-pressure dilatation.

Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure

The results of the pelvic pouch procedure were reviewed to assess the surgical complication rate and outcome of patients who had had the procedure performed with a stapled ileo-anal anastomosis with and without a defunctioning ileostomy. Between December 1982 and March 1992, 483 patients underwent a pelvic pouch (PP) procedure. Patients were divided into three groups: group I consisted of 325 patients (178 men and boys and 147 women and girls) who underwent a PP procedure with a handsewn ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) with a defunctioning loop ileostomy. In group II, there were 87 patients (47 men and boys and 40 women and girls) who had a stapled IAA with a defunctioning ileostomy. Group III patients consisted of 71 patients (43 men and boys and 28 women and girls) who had a stapled IAA with no covering ileostomy. Assessment was made of the IAA leak rate, the surgical complications, the reoperation rate, and functional outcome. Early surgical complications included 40 (12%) IAA leaks in group I patients compared with only six (7%) leaks in group II patients who had a stapled IAA (p < 0.05). In group III patients, who had a stapled IAA but no covering ileostomy, there were 13 leaks (18%). Eleven of these 13 leaks healed spontaneously with tube drainage; one patient remains with a rectal tube in place 6 weeks after operation, and only one patient has required a reoperation (defunctioning ileostomy). Functionally, all patients with a healed IAA after a leak have had an excellent result comparable to those without a leak. Patients who were male, older than age 40, on steroids, and had had a true one-stage PP procedure, had a greater risk of developing an IAA leak. In two patients, there was intraoperative difficulty, and one of these patients had an IAA leak after operation. Disease activity at the resection margin and patient weight did not affect the leak rate. Our results suggest that the IAA leak rate is significantly reduced in patients with a stapled IAA with an ileostomy compared with those with a handsewn IAA. Omission of the defunctioning ileostomy is associated with a higher IAA leak rate, but spontaneous healing occurs in almost all patients without impairment of functional results. In patients in whom the ileostomy is omitted, the IAA leak rate is greatest in male patients who have undergone a true one-stage PP procedure, are on steroids, and are older than age 40.

Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without covering ileostomy in ulcerative colitis

The experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is reported in 16 consecutive patients with no covering ileostomy (group 2) in comparison with 15 patients with a covering stoma (group 1); in each group a J pouch was constructed. All patients had pre- and postoperative clinical and manometric evaluations of the functional result up to 12 months. There were no deaths or permanent failures. The number of early complications was four in each group. Re-ileostomy was needed in one patient of group 1, and an ileostomy was constructed in three patients of group 2. At 1 year after operation the functional results did not differ between groups 1 and 2 in terms of daily frequency of defaecation (mean 5.6 and 5.4 in 24 h respectively), or in terms of anal basal or maximal squeeze pressures. There was a significant (P less than 0.01) saving in total hospital stay (median 11 days) and in operating theatre time (mean 41 min) in patients with no covering ileostomy. It is concluded that a covering ileostomy may be unnecessary in restorative proctocolectomy, at least in suitable cases with no technical difficulty at the time of operation.

Restorative proctocolectomy: the Irish experience. Irish Association of Coloproctology

Between January 1982 and March 1990, 106 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy in eight separate surgical departments. The indication for operation was ulcerative colitis in 86%, familial adenomatous polyposis in 12% and megacolon in 2%. The age at operation was 33 +/- 2 years (mean +/- sem) (range 15-55 years). There were no perioperative deaths. The principal causes of post-operative morbidity were intra-abdominal sepsis (15%), anastomotic stricture (10%) and intestinal obstruction (8%). Intestinal continuity has been restored in 99 patients. All were grossly continent, but 32% experienced occasional soiling. The mean stool frequency was 5/day and 1/night. The overall failure rate was 6%. Eighty-nine percent of patients were happy with the outcome. We conclude that restorative proctocolectomy is safe and provides acceptable functional results. It should be the operation of choice in most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis.

Restorative proctocolectomy: a procedure for the district general hospital?

Restorative proctocolectomy is widely regarded as the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, the majority being carried out within specialised regional centres. The use of this procedure outside such centres has been investigated by reviewing the results from a District General Hospital (DGH) over the 8 year period 1981-1989. Seventeen patients (11 male and 6 female with a median age of 36 years) underwent total colectomy and ileoanal anastomosis with formation of a pelvic reservoir (TC-IA). Fourteen had ulcerative colitis (UC), 2 familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and one a colonic and rectal cancer. Three pouch designs were used ("S" in 7, "J" in 8 and "W" in 2) with no operative or perioperative deaths. Further laparotomy was required in two patients for adhesions and pelvic sepsis. Functional results were assessed in 16 patients at a mean of 5 years after surgery. The median daily stool frequency was 5 (range 2-6). Twelve of the 16 patients defaecate spontaneously, 2 regularly self-catheterized and 2 do so occasionally. None of the patients is incontinent of formed or liquid stool but one has occasional soiling. These results suggest that TC-IA may be satisfactorily performed outside a specialised unit.