Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective

Is newer always better?: comparing cost and short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic right hemicolectomy

BACKGROUND

Enthusiasm is high for expansion of robotic assisted surgery into right hemicolectomy. But data on outcomes and cost is lacking. Our objective was to determine the association between surgical approach and cost for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy. We hypothesized that a robot approach would have increased costs (both economic and opportunity) while achieving similar short-term outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis with a simulation of operating room utilization at a quaternary care, academic institution. We enrolled patients undergoing minimally invasive right hemicolectomy from November 2017 to August 2019. Patients were categorized by the intended approach- laparoscopic or robotic. The primary outcome was the technical variable direct cost. Secondary outcomes included total cost, supply cost, operating room utilization, operative time, conversion, length of stay and 30-day post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

79 patients were included in the study. A robotic approach was used in 22% of the cohort. The groups differed significantly only in etiology of surgery. Robotic surgery was associated with a 1.5 times increase in the technical variable direct cost (p < 0.001), increased supply cost (2.6 times; p < 0.001) and increased total cost (1.3 times; p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in median room time (Robotic: 285 min vs. Laparoscopic: 170 min; p < 0.001) and procedure time (Robotic: 203 min vs. Laparoscopic: 118 min; p < 0.001). There were no differences observed in post-operative outcomes including length of stay or readmission. In a simulation of OR utilization, 45 laparoscopic right hemicolectomies could be performed in an OR in a month compared to 31 robotic cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic right hemicolectomy was associated with increased costs with no improvement in post-operative outcomes. In a simulation of operating room efficiency, a robotic approach was associated with 14 fewer cases per month. Practitioners and administrators should be aware of the increased cost of a robotic approach.

Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Aims and background

Aging of the population and a longer life expectancy have led to an increased number of elderly patients presenting with colorectal cancer and searching for treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of age on the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer at a single department.

Methods

Perioperative outcome of patients ≥75 years old undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery between June 2005 and January 2009 for colorectal cancer were compared with findings in younger patients.

Results

The analysis considered 134 patients <75 years and 82 patients ≥75 years of age. There was a significant difference in perioperative risk factors, as reflected by different ASA scores and a significantly higher postoperative ‘medical’ morbidity, but ‘surgical’ morbidity was similar in the two groups and remained low.

Discussion

Surgical morbidity rate was not affected by age. Cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbid conditions were mainly responsible for the higher morbidity rate reported in the elderly patients, although advanced age, per se, should not be considered a contraindication to laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery-a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the safety, tolerability and outcome of early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery.

METHODS

A total of 120 consecutive patients who underwent elective open bowel surgeries were randomized into either early feeding (n = 60) or traditional feeding group (n = 60). Patients in the early feeding group were started on oral fluids on post-operative day 1, while those in the traditional feeding group were started orals after the resolution of ileus. Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, co-morbidity, first flatus, first defecation, time of starting solid diet, complications and length of hospitalization were assessed between the two groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in demographic and baseline data. The number of days to first flatus (p < 0.0001), first defecation (p < 0.0001), length of post-operative stay (p = 0.011) and time of starting solid diet (p < 0.0001) were significantly earlier in the early feeding group. Anastomotic leak, wound infection, fever, vomiting, abdominal distention and other complications were similar. Multivariate analysis showed that patients in the early oral feeding group were discharged 3.4 days earlier (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing elective open bowel surgeries, early post-operative feeding is safe, is well tolerated and reduces the length of hospitalization.

Shorter postoperative atony after laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection?

BACKGROUND

The duration of the postoperative ileus after laparoscopic surgery remains a controversial topic. The aim of our study was to compare the restoration of intestinal motility after laparoscopically assisted and conventional resection of the distal colon in a canine model.

METHODS

Two weeks after the implantation of three electrodes on the jejunum, the distal colon was resected in a laparoscopic-assisted or conventional procedure in two groups of four dogs each. Gastrointestinal motility was monitored by registration of the electromyograhic activity of the small intestine and by intermittent fluoroscopies of radiopaque markers.

RESULTS

Electrical activity in the early postoperative period was characterized by the basic electrical rhythm and the absence of spike activity. The first postoperative activity front of the migrating motility complex (MMC), indicating the restoration of motility, occurred significantly earlier after laparoscopic-assisted resection (4.5 +/- 1 hr) than after conventional resection (31 +/- 10 h). Radiological observations showed a significantly delayed gastric emptying and a prolonged transit of radiopaque markers to the rectum after open surgery.

CONCLUSION

These results support the hypothesis that laparoscopic-assisted resection of the colon leads to a shortened postoperative atony in comparison to open surgery.

Effects of early oral feeding on relapse and symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer is the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and nutritional support is a helpful strategy in malnutrition prevention during treatment. As early oral feeding in patients with GIB may shorten hospital stay and decrease costs and risk of infection, the present study was carried out to investigate the effects of early oral feeding on relapse and symptoms of upper GIB.

METHODS

The present clinical trial was conducted with the participation of 100 patients with upper GIB due to gastric or duodenum ulcer at Emam Reza University Hospital in Tabriz. Subjects were randomly allocated to two groups (n=50). In one group, patients received oral diet from day 1 and in other group patients were nil by mouth until day 3 and then received oral diet. Endoscopic and clinical findings of patients were recorded from day 1 to 3.

RESULTS

The mean age of subjects was 57.6±1.7 and 63% were male. Sclerotherapy was used in most cases as a hemostasis treatment. There was no significant difference in laboratory findings and rebleeding between the two groups. In the group with early oral feeding, the time of hospital stay was significantly shorter than in the control group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although early oral feeding had no significant effects on electrolyte balance and treatment outcomes in patients with upper GIB who were treated with endoscopic hemostasis, it could effectively shorten the hospital stay. Consequently, early oral feeding in these patients enables early discharge and reduces the costs of treatment.

Laparoscopy for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers in septuagenarians: a retrospective, comparative study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to analyze the results of laparoscopy in septuagenarians with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid or rectal resections for cancer were retrospectively selected from the database of our institution. The study group (Lap > 70 group), contained the cancer patients over 70 years old who were treated with laparoscopy. Patients less than 70 years old who underwent a laparoscopic procedure (Lap < 70 group), and those over than 70 years old who underwent conventional surgery (Open > 70 group), were assigned to control groups. Demographics, information regarding tumors, perioperative data, pathological results, and survival in the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were 56, 166, and 34 patients in the Lap > 70, Lap < 70, and Open > 70 groups, respectively. Patients in the Lap > 70 group were significantly older than other groups. The American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were higher, and the presence of the studied risk factors was more common in the Lap > 70 group than the Lap < 70 group. Intraoperative bleeding and the amount and number of perioperative transfusions required were less in the Lap > 70 group than in the Open > 70 group. The number of harvested lymph nodes was less in the Lap > 70 group than both study groups. Five-year survival in the Lap > 70 group was similar to that in the Lap < 70 group and significantly better than in the Open > 70 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer in patients over 70 may be feasible and safe as it is in younger patients. The present study has revealed that laparoscopy in the elderly may be superior to conventional techniques as regards some intraoperative findings and survival.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature reporting minimally invasive proctectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We report a novel application of a robotic system to perform restorative proctectomy in patients with toxic UC.

METHODS

Retrospective review, case series report.

RESULTS

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic proctectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis was performed in three patients with toxic UC. All patients previously underwent urgent laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. One female and two male patients were aged 39, 24 and 43, respectively. The procedures were performed safely with minimal complications. The robotic proctectomy operative time was reduced from 134 to 106 min. None of the patients have experienced fecal incontinence, nocturnal seepage or sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a case series report of a robotic-assisted laparoscopic proctectomy with restorative ileal J-pouch in patients with toxic UC. This technique has been previously described for use in patients with medically refractory UC and neoplasia associated with chronic UC. This series exemplifies an ideal application of a robotic system with improved visibility, rotation and ergonomics.

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies have addressed the issue of the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients, usually by choosing an arbitrary cut-off age limit, and retrospectively evaluating patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of age on the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in a single department, by comparing younger and older patients, matched by ASA score and type of operation.

METHODS

The perioperative outcome of patients ≥75 years old who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer between June 2005 and January 2009 were compared with findings in younger patients, matched by ASA score and type of operation.

RESULTS

The study included 100 patients, fifty <75 years old (Group A) and fifty ≥75 (Group B) years old. There were 18 right hemicolectomies, 16 left hemicolectomies, 4 anterior resections, 9 low anterior resections, 2 Miles' operations and 1 segmental resection in each group. We observed a significantly higher overall morbidity rate among elderly patients than among younger patients (24 vs. 8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in patients ≥75 years old reveal that they have higher postoperative risk compared to their younger counterparts, even when matched by ASA score and type of operation. It suggests that although advanced age, per se, is not a contraindication, it is a risk for patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. This surgery in elderly patients should be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers to keep postoperative risk to a minimum.

Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: does weight matter?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown improved outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for surgery for both benign and malignant colorectal diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study was designed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic colorectal resections in normal weight patients compared with overweight and obese patients with IBD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively acquired institutional review board-approved surgical database was performed. All consecutive patients with IBD who underwent laparoscopy from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2008 were reviewed. BMI, age, gender, comorbidities, ASA classification, and surgical- and disease-related variables, including 60-day postoperative complications, were reviewed. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U test, and Student's t test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients with IBD underwent laparoscopy: 48 were excluded and 213 were analyzed. Group I comprised 127 normal-weight patients (body mass index (BMI), 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), and group II included 67 overweight patients (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) and 19 obese patients (BMI >or= 30 kg/m(2)). Crohn's disease was diagnosed in 86 (67.7%) patients in group I and 52 (60.4%) in group II. Procedures performed included ileocolic resection in 56% of patients in each group. Total colectomy with or without proctectomy was undertaken in 39.4% in group I and 40.7% in group II. The conversion rate was 18% for group I and 22.09% for group II (p > 0.005; not significant). The most common reason for conversion was failure to progress due to adhesions or phlegmon. There were no differences in major postoperative complication rates (wound infection, abscess, anastomotic leakage, or small-bowel obstruction) or mean hospital stay (6.7, 6.8, respectively), and there was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD who were overweight or obese and who underwent laparoscopic bowel resection had no significant differences in the rates of conversion, major postoperative complications, or length of stay when comparing to patients with normal BMI. Therefore, the benefits of laparoscopic bowel resection should not be denied to overweight or obese patients based strictly on their BMI.

Cautionary considerations regarding N.O.T.E.S. in oncology

Over the last number of years, the emphasis in abdominal surgery has been to reduce invasiveness and to minimise trauma to the patient. This has led to the rapid development of laparoscopic techniques initially for the surgical management of benign disease and later for the successful management of malignant disease. Laparoscopy has now been shown to provide significant benefits to the cancer patient, in particular the reduction of wound infection, herniation and pain. More recently, benefits have been demonstrated in earlier discharge from hospital and return to normal activity. Laparoscopy has therefore been accepted as at least a valid alternative to open surgery for most types of abdominal cancer. With the objective of reducing invasiveness even more, the last few years has seen a rapid expansion in the development of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Currently, NOTES is still in the early stages of evolution but its potential uses in the field of cancer surgery are already being proposed. To develop NOTES to the stage that it will be safe, effective and widely available for the management of cancer patients represents a huge challenge ranging from the development of equipment and techniques to the demonstration of safety and efficacy in clinical trials as well as training and competence issues. It is still not clear whether these challenges will be surmounted so that NOTES becomes mainstream therapy. A period of 'watchful waiting' seems appropriate therefore for the uncommitted general surgeon in order that NOTES may be given time to prove compelling and convincing before its general uptake into routine practice.

Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians.

METHODS

Patients aged 80 years or older who underwent elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 2006 were recruited for analysis, with the following exceptions: 1) patients who did not give informed consent; 2) unfit for operative treatment; 3) presented as surgical emergencies; 4) multiple previous abdominal operations; or 5) locally advanced tumors. Operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, mortality and morbidities, including anastomotic dehiscence, pulmonary and wound sepsis, disease recurrence, and patient survival were used to measure outcome.

RESULTS

During a ten-year period, laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection was attempted in 101 octogenarians. The median age was 83 (range, 80-95) years and 45 patients were males. The median operating time was 110 (range, 60-245) minutes, with a median blood loss of 50 (range, 0-1,000) ml. Conversion was required in only one case with a leakage rate of 3.3 percent. The overall morbidity and operative mortality rate were 17 and 3 percent, respectively. With a median follow-up of 24 (range, 0-102) months, 22 patients developed recurrence, with 8 of those still surviving. The overall five-year survival is 51 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience confirms that laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in selected octogenarians is safe and feasible. Aside from the obvious short-term benefits, the long-term oncologic outcomes are favorable.

Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

Acceptance of laparoscopy for the management of oncological disease has been slow due to the increased complexity of the technique, requirement of technological advances, and fears for the oncological safety of the approach. Laparoscopic oncological surgery has a role in the management of oncological patients at all stages of disease. Good evidence exists for the laparoscopic approach being a viable option for colon cancer patients. Current large multicenter trials will report the true outcomes of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery and how it compares with open surgery. This article examines some of the parameters by which laparoscopic colectomy will be judged.

Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An evaluation of the mesorectum’s macroscopic quality

BACKGROUND

Next to surgical margins, yield of lymph nodes, and length of bowel resected, macroscopic completeness of mesorectal excision may serve as another quality control of total mesorectal excision (TME). In this study, the macroscopic completeness of laparoscopic TME was evaluated.

METHODS

A series of 25 patients with rectal cancer were managed laparoscopically (LTME) and included in this study. The pathologic specimens of the LTME group were prospectively examined and matched with a historical group of resection specimens from patients who had undergone open TME (OTME). The two groups were matched for gender and type of resection (low anterior or abdominoperineal resection). Special care was given to the macroscopic judgment concerning the completeness of the mesorectum.

RESULTS

A three-grade scoring system showed no differences between the LTME and OTME groups.

CONCLUSION

The current study supports the hypothesis that oncologic resection using laparoscopic TME is feasible and adequate.

Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

BACKGROUND

The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer during the annual congress in Lisbon, Portugal, in June 2002.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was combined with the opinions, of experts in the field of colon cancer surgery to formulate evidence-based statements and recommendations on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer.

RESULTS

Advanced age, obesity, and previous abdominal operations are not considered absolute contraindications for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. The most common cause for conversion is the presence of bulky or invasive tumors. Laparoscopic operation takes longer to perform than the open counterpart, but the outcome is similar in terms of specimen size and pathological examination. Immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality are comparable for laparoscopic and open colonic cancer surgery. The laparoscopically operated patients had less postoperative pain, better-preserved pulmonary function, earlier restoration of gastrointestinal function, and an earlier discharge from the hospital. The postoperative stress response is lower after laparoscopic colectomy. The incidence of port site metastases is <1%. Survival after laparoscopic resection of colon cancer appears to be at least equal to survival after open resection. The costs of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer are higher than those for open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure that improves short-term outcome. Results regarding the long-term survival of patients enrolled in large multicenter trials will determine its role in general surgery.

Hand Port-Site Metastasis of Renal-Cell Carcinoma Following Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Case Report

A 66-year-old man underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALN) for a 10 x 7-cm, stage T(2)N(0)M(0) right-sided renal-cell carcinoma. Nine months later, tumor recurrence was noted at the previous hand port site. This is the first case report of such a metastasis. Possible mechanisms for tumor metastasis are reviewed, and preventive strategies are suggested.

Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current place of laparoscopy in the management of colorectal disease.

METHOD

A literature search was undertaken on Medline between the period 1991 and 2002.

RESULTS

From the literature there is good evidence that the laparoscopic approach is associated with at least some short-term advantages. Improved cosmesis and better patient's satisfaction are also evident. Because of this laparoscopy has been widely employed in various benign conditions. Among others, laparoscopic stoma formation, laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease and Crohn's disease, laparoscopic rectopexy, as well as laparoscopic assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure were commonly reported. As port site recurrence and oncological safety are of less concern, there have been increasing reports on laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Although long-term follow up data is still limited, results of large prospective studies as well as various randomized trials show that recurrence and survival rates of the laparoscopic approach were at least comparable to open surgery. As experience and confidence accumulates, there are also increasing reports on technically demanding, laparoscopic sphincter-saving rectal excision. Articles on functional aspects following this type of resection also start to appear, which might be one of the future directions.

CONCLUSION

The applicability of laparoscopy to colorectal disease continues to expand. Laparoscopic approach should be considered for patients with benign conditions. For colorectal cancer, results from randomized trials so far have been favourable. Hence, the authors suggest the utility of laparoscopy in potentially curable cancer can also be judiciously relaxed.

Effects of carbon dioxide and nitrogen on adhesive growth and expressions of E-cadherin and VEGF of human colon cancer cell CCL-228

AIM: To study the effects of carbon dioxide on the metastatic capability of cancer cells, and to compare them with that of nitrogen.

METHODS: The colon cancer cell CCL-228 was treated with 100% carbon dioxide or nitrogen at different time points and then cultured under normal condition. Twelve hours after the treatment, the survival rates of suspension cells and the expressions of e-cadherin and VEGF were examined.

RESULTS: After 60 min of carbon dioxide and longer time of nitrogen treatment, the suspended cells increased and the expression of e-cadherin decreased while the expression of VEGF was enhanced significantly. And the effects of nitrogen were similar to, but weaker than, those of carbon dioxide.

CONCLUSION: Carbon dioxide may improve the metastatic capability of cancer cells and its effects are significantly stronger than that of nitrogen. A sequential use of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in pneumoperitoneum may take the advantage of both gases.

Complications and conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicenter Brazilian trial

This multicentric national registry reports the experience of 16 Brazilian surgical teams in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Between 1992 and 2001, 1966 patients (941 men [47.8%] and 1025 women [52.1%]) were operated on, with ages ranging from 1 to 94 years (average, 55.9 years). Benign diseases were diagnosed in 1170 patients (59.5%). There were 82 (4.2%) reported intraoperative complications (range, 2.0-9.8%), 209 (10.6%) conversions to laparotomy (range, 1.4-23.5%), and 383 (19.4%) postoperative complications (8.0-29.6%). Mortality occurred in 29 patients (1.5%). During the early experience (first 50 operated patients in each surgical team), there were more intraoperative complications (8.1% x 1.7%), conversions (16.6% x 6.8%) and postoperative complications (25% x 16%). After an average follow-up of 26.5 months, 91 tumor recurrences (13.8%) were reported (0.45% parietal recurrences). There was no incisional recurrence in the ports used to withdraw the pathologic specimen. The Brazilian experience is significant, with complication and mortality rates similar to those reported in literature. The results indicate that experience reduces complication and mortality rates. Oncological results are satisfactory and the incidence of parietal recurrence is low and similar to other series.

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma. an overnight victory?

Laparoscopic surgery became popular in the early 1990s. Cholecystectomy was the first 'victim' conquered by the new technique and laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the gold standard operation for gallbladder stones. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery was then attempted, for both benign and malignant disorders. After a short period of enthusiasm, alarming reports were published on laparoscopic surgery for malignant disease. The occurrence of so called 'port-site' metastases (PSM) led to a reduction in the use of the minimal invasive technique. In addition, the duration of the operations was criticised, as well as the limited beneficial effects (if any) and the possible violation of oncological surgical principles. The pros and cons of this new technique during its introduction are discussed, with focus on problem areas such as port-site metastases, surgical learning curve as well as beneficial effects. The current status of several comparative studies evaluating the laparoscopic technique is discussed leading to the conclusion that a basis for further research exists and therefore cautious progress is warranted.

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision

After total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer was introduced in 1982, local recurrence rates decreased to 5%. These results were found to be reproducible; therefore, the technique became standard for the treatment of rectal cancer. Laparoscopic surgery for curable colorectal malignancy is still considered investigational. Indeed, the United States National Cancer Institute (NCI) trial excludes rectal carcinoma. The application of laparoscopy to rectal carcinoma must compete with total mesorectal excision, which has obtained favorable results in the last decade. In this review, we assess the adequacy of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, describe the techniques (both anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection), and discuss their potential advantages.

Alterations in the immune system and tumor growth in laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

The explosion in the use of therapeutic laparoscopy during the past decade has focused much research interest on finding a basic scientific support for the clinically apparent attenuation of the stress response to surgery. In particular, the potential impact that attenuation of the immune response to surgery may have on laparoscopy for the cure of malignancy has attracted much attention.

METHODS

A review of the published literature on the stress response to laparoscopic surgery and the impact of laparoscopy on tumor growth was performed.

RESULTS

Evidence favors an attenuation of the immune response to surgery with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Whether this is true also of more major procedures such as laparoscopically assisted colectomy for malignancy is currently unclear. In animal models, tumor growth after laparoscopic surgery is less than after laparotomy and depends on the insufflation agent used.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be associated with attenuation of the immune response to surgery. The implications of these findings for the future use of laparoscopic surgical techniques for malignant disease remain unclear.

Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach

PURPOSE

Total mesorectal excision offers the lowest reported rates of local recurrence for rectal cancer; however, the ability to perform total mesorectal excision laparoscopically remains unproven. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and adequacy of a totally laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A prospective review of all patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by a single surgeon was undertaken. These were compared with a control group undergoing open rectal resections by another colorectal consultant in the unit (n = 22). Comparison of total specimen length, longitudinal and radial excision margins, and lymph node yield was made between groups.

RESULTS

Of 42 laparoscopic-assisted rectal resections attempted, 14 (33 percent) were converted to open procedures and six had their dissection completed open. One resection was considered noncurative. Twenty-one total mesorectal excisions (50 percent) were completed totally laparoscopically. No significant difference was detected between groups for specimen length, radial margin, or lymph node yield. Longitudinal margin of excision was longer in the laparoscopic group (4 (3.5-5) vs. 2.5 (1.05-3.5) cm; P = 0.02, Mann-Whitney). Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (180 (168-218) vs. 125 (104-144) minutes; P = 0.003, Mann-Whitney). Data are medians (interquartile ranges). Four patients in the laparoscopic-assisted group had clinical anastomotic leakage vs. one in the open group (P = 0.329, Fisher's exact test). At median follow-up of 38 (range, 6-53) months, one local recurrence had occurred in each group and crude mortality rates were 29 and 23 percent in the laparoscopic-assisted and open groups, respectively (P = 0.736, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

Totally laparoscopic excision of the mesorectum is feasible in 50 percent of patients and where possible yields histologic parameters comparable to open surgery. Early survival and recurrence figures also appear to be comparable.

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group

PURPOSE

Although laparoscopic colorectal surgery is attracting ever more attention, its use for curative treatment of colorectal carcinoma in particular continues to be controversial. The present study was an attempt to analyze the results of the perioperative course, oncologic quality, and preliminary long-term results.

METHOD

The data considered here were collected within the framework of a prospective, observational study initiated on August 1, 1995, and involving a total of 18 institutions in Germany and Austria. At the end of three years, the results are now being presented selectively, i.e., focusing only on abdominoperineal resection.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections, 98 (84.5 percent) of which were performed with curative intent. The mean operating time was 226 (confidence interval, 140-365) minutes. Seven patients (6 percent) experienced an intraoperative complication, which in more than one-half of the cases was a vascular injury involving the presacral venous plexus; the conversion rate was 3.4 percent. Postoperatively, 40 patients developed 97 complications--including those of a very minor nature--giving an overall morbidity rate of 34.4 percent. Reoperation in six patients (5.2 percent) had to be performed for an afterbleed in one-half of the cases and ileus in the other one-half. Postoperative mortality was a low 1.7 percent. In most of the curative resections, an oncologically radical operation with high transection of the inferior mesenteric artery and a complete dissection of the pelvis down to the floor was performed. The median number of lymph nodes investigated was 11.5, and there was wide fluctuation in the numbers among the individual institutions. Tumor cell dissemination occurred intraoperatively in five patients. In the meantime, 79 patients (81 percent) underwent at least one follow-up examination, the mean follow-up period being 491 days. Seven patients developed a local recurrence, and a further six patients developed distant metastases. For recurrence-free survival rate, the Kaplan-Meier estimation calculated a probability of 71 percent.

CONCLUSION

Not all of the reservations about laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection, in particular with regard to resection with curative intent, have yet been eliminated. The present study does, however, show that a laparoscopic approach can in principle meet oncologic requirements of radicality and, with regard to the postoperative course, is associated with considerable benefits to the patient.

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: an oncologic feasible option

The conventional and accepted treatment for curative resection of colon cancer is laparotomy with hemicolectomy for right or left sided lesions. The technique of colon resection through an open laparotomy incision is well known. Over the past several years, laparoscopically assisted colectomy has been developed and studied, following the explosion of laparoscopic technology from the cholecystectomy experience and with acquisition of advanced general laparoscopic techniques. The right, left or sigmoid colon can be mobilized and regional lymphadenectomy performed using laparoscopic instruments and video-imaging equipment. The advantage of laparoscopic colectomy is the use of small abdominal port site and wound incisions which translate to reduced postoperative pain and analgesic requirement, earlier return of bowel function and normal physical activities, and shorter hospital stay without increasing health care costs. Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with open colectomy in terms of surgical morbidity and mortality. The laparoscopic approach has been shown to be technically and oncologically feasible with equivalent lymph node harvest from mesenteric lymphadenectomy and achieves adequate proximal and distal margins of colonic resection. Despite initial early anecdotal reports of port site cancer recurrence in laparoscopically assisted colectomy, port site recurrence is rare and its incidence is similar to incisional recurrences in conventional open colectomy. Recent prospective comparative studies have demonstrated equivalent patient survival and equivalent local or distant colon cancer recurrences for open versus laparoscopic curative resection of colon cancer.

A Case-Control Study of Laparoscopic versus Open Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticulitis

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (LSC) for diverticular disease accounts for a limited number of laparoscopic colon cases performed nationally because of the technical challenge it presents. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and impact of the laparoscopic approach in elective sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease and to compare these results with those of the open approach. Twenty elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies (LSCs) were performed for diverticulitis between April 1992 and July 1999 at a university-affiliated urban hospital. A case-control study was performed comparing LCS with a matched control group of conventional open sigmoidectomies. Fourteen of 20 sigmoidectomies were successfully completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time for LSC was similar to that for open sigmoid colectomy (251 vs 243 minutes). There was earlier return to oral intake in the LSC group (1 vs 5 days; P < 0.001). The mean length of stay was significantly shorter ( P = 0.029) in LSC (4.8 days) versus open sigmoid colectomy (7.8 days). Conversion to open sigmoidectomy extended hospital stay to 8.16 days. The overall complication rate was 10 per cent in both groups. We conclude that LSC can be performed effectively and with a low complication rate for diverticular disease. LSC provides the benefit of quicker return of bowel function and shorter hospitalization.

Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched series

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4% (7/38), 21.4% early in the series and 10% in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic-associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P < .001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P < .001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P < .001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P < .001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P < .001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Despite the widespread use of laparoscopic techniques in many fields, in the realm of malignant diseases, a great concern has been raised regarding safety, efficacy, and long-term results. The authors report their experience of 163 patients operated on for colorectal malignancies by minimally invasive access. The conversion rate (20.4%), morbidity (15.1%), and null mortality compare well with other studies published worldwide. The postoperative outcome was characterized by a prompt return to activity (1.3 days) and of bowel movements (2.9 days), while length of stay and an adequate oral resumption were comparable to those of open surgery. Peritoneal lavage did not show tumor cells disseminated during the operative maneuvers. The distance of tumor from resection margins and the number of lymph nodes harvested with the operative specimen did not vary from those obtained in open surgery. Two patients (1.2%) recurred at the mini-laparotomy and port sites, but, in both cases, the traumatic manipulation of the cancer specimen was probably responsible for the event. After a mean follow-up of over 3 years, 34 patients died of neoplastic recurrence, and 17 are alive with disease relapse. The laparoscopic approach to colectomy has not yet gained an unquestioned place in the experience of the colorectal surgeon. However, if sound surgical method and judgement are used to minimize local recurrences, and if a better preservation of postoperative immune function proves to be of clinical significance in the long term, laparoscopic colectomy may prove to be a safe and less stressful approach to colon resection.

Minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer

Laparoscopic approaches are increasingly being applied to colorectal surgical procedures. Initial concerns regarding the existence of benefits from the laparoscopic approach have now been addressed. Even as these were being addressed, however, further concerns arose regarding the appropriateness of this technique in malignancy. Colorectal cancer is the only intra-abdominal malignancy that is knowingly resected employing laparoscopic techniques. This controversy was highlighted by reports of early wound implants. With careful technique, training and experience, however, wound recurrences are rarely seen, suggesting that this phenomenon, in the clinical setting, is primarily technique-related. Lack of rigorous evidence either condemning or supporting the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resulted in the establishment of several large-scale randomized, prospective trials, all currently in progress, that aim to determine if laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer results in oncologic outcomes comparable to the open approach.

Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update

Laparoscopic colon surgery is gaining acceptance for benign conditions, but cannot yet be considered an established procedure for malignancy. The main reported benefit of the technique is the reduction in length of hospital stay. Other potential benefits such as cosmesis, improvement in quality of life, physiologic and immunologic advantages, as well as reduced complication rates have not been clearly demonstrated. Concerns about laparoscopic colon surgery for cancer including the possibility of inadequate resection, tumor staging, and altered tumor spread due to pneumoperitoneum have only been partially addressed by retrospective and experimental studies and require a prospective randomized trial for definitive resolution. Details of the trial currently underway sponsored by the National Institutes of Health are described. Although innovations in clinical practice and increased familiarity account for the expanding popularity of laparoscopic colon surgery, results from this and similar worldwide trials are needed before this approach can be recommended for cancer.

Port-site metastases following laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Application of laparoscopy to the resection of malignancy has been followed by a literature describing cases of metastatic involvement at laparoscopic port sites. These include patients who underwent surgery for early stage carcinoma and instances following laparoscopic procedures during which tumours were not dissected.

METHODS

Recently published clinical and experimental studies, and case reports related to this problem are reviewed; their relevance is discussed.

RESULTS

Experimental studies incorporating bench top and large animal models have confirmed that tumour cells may be redistributed to port sites during laparoscopic surgery either directly from contaminated instruments or indirectly via the insufflation gas. Small animal models suggest that the incidence of wound metastasis is increased following conventional laparoscopic surgery, and that it may be decreased by gasless laparoscopy or helium insufflation. This evidence suggests that the development of port-site metastases depends not only on the physical redistribution of tumour cells but also on the specific insufflation gas used, possibly because of influences on local metabolic or immune factors acting at the wound site.

CONCLUSION

Further research in this area is urgent. Until the issue is better understood, patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for malignancy should be entered into clinical trials.

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review

BACKGROUND

The success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in providing patient benefits in the immediate postoperative period has led to laparoscopic techniques being used for many other intra-abdominal procedures. Colorectal resection for malignancy is one of the more contentious applications of this new technology, because the postoperative benefits are more subtle and the long-term onco logical results are as yet unknown.

METHODS

A review of the English-language literature was undertaken in order to collate and analyse all published series where 20 or more laparoscopic colectomies were performed. and where the indication for resection in the majority of cases was adenocarcinoma of the colon.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer can be performed safely by experienced surgeons, although there is a considerable learning curve for the procedure. The expected benefits of minimal access surgery are provided by laparoscopic colectomy, although to a lesser extent than that seen with other procedures. The oncological safety of the procedure is as yet unproven. It is clear that an equivalent resection can be performed, but not whether this translates to an equivalent recurrence and survival rate. Reports of isolated port site recurrences are of concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer are encouraging, although the fate of this procedure rests with the analysis of the large multicentre prospective randomized trials currently under way, particularly with regard to the long-term recurrence and survival rates.

Place of laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease

Laparoscopic surgery for patients with Crohn's disease is feasible and safe. It may be conducted in appropriately selected patients including those with localized abscess, phlegmon, simple intra-abdominal fistulas, and perianastomotic recurrent disease. However, as the technique is just evolving and has yet to be shown to be of advantage over conventional open surgery, it should not be considered as a standard care. Randomized prospective clinical studies are needed to determine that laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is at least equivalent or better than conventional open surgery.

Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn's disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications?

BACKGROUND

Because of the inflammatory nature of Crohn's disease, ileocolic resections are often difficult to perform, especially if an abscess, phlegmon, or recurrent disease at a previous ileocolic anastomosis is present. Our goal was to determine whether the above factors are contraindications to a successful laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1996, 46 laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections were attempted. Fourteen patients had an abscess or phlegmon treated with bowel rest before operation (group I), 10 patients had recurrent Crohn's disease at the previous ileocolic anastomosis (group II), and 22 patients had no previous operation and no phlegmon or abscess associated with their disease (group III). These groups were compared with each other and with 70 consecutive open ileocolic resections for Crohn's disease during the same time period (group IV).

RESULTS

Operative blood loss and time were greater in group IV than in groups I, II, and III (245 versus 151, 131, and 195 ml, respectively, and 202 versus 152, 144, and 139 minutes, respectively). Conversion to open procedure occurred in 5 patients (group I, 1 [7%]; group II, 2 [20%]; group III, 2 [9%]). Morbidity was highest in group IV (21% versus 0%, 10%, and 10%, respectively). Only one patient died (group IV, 1%). Length of hospital stay was longest in group IV (7.9 versus 4.8, 3.9, and 4.5 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic-assisted approach to Crohn's disease is feasible and safe with good outcomes. Co-morbid preoperative findings such as abscess, phlegmon, or recurrent disease at the previous ileocolic anastomosis are not contraindications to a successful laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection in select patients.

Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to test if the techniques learned during our early learning experience have proved to be effective in reducing the complications specifically related to the laparoscopic technique of colorectal surgery.

METHODS

From October 1991 until July 1996, 195 laparoscopic operations were performed on the colon and the rectum. These data were divided into "early" and "latter" groups. The conversion reasons and early and late postoperative complications were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Incidence of conversions required because of iatrogenic injuries showed a decline from 7.3 percent in the early group to 1.4 percent in the latter group. Sixty-six postoperative complications were observed in 59 (30.3 percent) patients. Complications specifically related to the technique of laparoscopic surgery occurred in nine (4.6 percent) patients. These were postoperative bleeding in three patients, port site hernias in five patients, and left ureteric stricture in one patient. Eight (6.5 percent) of these complications occurred in the early group, whereas one (1.4 percent) occurred in the latter group. Analyzing the conversions caused by intraoperative iatrogenic injuries and the specific postoperative complications together reveals that the incidence of 13.8 percent (17/123) in the early group has been reduced significantly to 2.8 percent (2/72) in the latter group.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our experience, we have identified techniques, which are discussed in detail, to make laparoscopic colorectal surgery safe. Strict adherence to these techniques has significantly reduced the incidence of complications, specifically those related to the laparoscopic technique.

Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a simplified technique and audit of twelve cases

Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure was performed in 12 patients over a 2-year period. The group comprised three patients with colonic carcinoma and nine with diverticular disease, their mean age being 62 years (range 40-73). In all twelve cases, intestinal continuity was successfully restored, without conversion to open surgery, in a median anesthetic time of 165 min (range 110-240). One patient required a temporary defunctioning colostomy and two other patients had three complications. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 5-12). We report a retrospective audit of this consecutive series of 12 patients, showing that laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's is technically feasible. We also give details of the morbidity associated with the technique.

Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to compare morbidity, mortality, and pathology after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy (LARHC) or open right hemicolectomy (ORHC) for cancer of the right colon.

METHODS

Patients undergoing either LARHC or ORHC for invasive carcinoma of the right colon during a 30-month period were studied. Data were collected from two sources. All morbidity, mortality, and pathology data were collected prospectively in a form suitable for computer storage and analysis as part of the ongoing Concord Hospital Colorectal Cancer Registry. Data concerning in hospital course were obtained by casenote review.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent LARHC, and 33 had an ORHC during the study period. The two groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, weight, associated comorbidities, and tumor stage. Mean operating room use time was significantly higher for LARHC (LARHC = 261 minutes; ORHC = 203 minutes; P < 0.001). Mean hospital stay from date of resection was the same in both groups (LARHC = 12 days; ORHC = 12.2 days). There was no significant difference between procedures with respect to postoperative complications, return of gastrointestinal function, or narcotic analgesic requirements. There was a significant shorter distal margin of resection in the LARHC group (ORHC = 13.4 cm; LARHC = 10 cm; P = 0.03). Total cost was significantly greater for LARHC ($9,064 vs. $7,881 (Australian); P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 23.4 months for the LARHC group and 23.9 months for the ORHC group. To date, there have been no local or port site recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Although there is no difference in morbidity and mortality following LARHC or ORHC, there is no apparent benefit for LARHC.

Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease

PURPOSE

The role of laparoscopic surgery in treatment of patients with diverticulitis is unclear. A retrospective comparison of laparoscopic with conventional surgery for patients with chronic diverticulitis was performed to assess morbidity, recovery from surgery, and cost.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing elective resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis from 1992 to 1994 at a single institution were reviewed. Laparoscopic resection involved complete intracorporeal dissection, bowel division, and anastomosis with extracorporeal placement of an anvil.

RESULTS

Sigmoid and left colon resections were performed laparoscopically in 25 patients and by open technique in 17 patients by two independent operating teams. No significant differences existed in age, gender, weight, comorbidities, or operations performed. In the laparoscopic group, three operations were converted to open laparotomy (12 percent) because of unclear anatomy. Major complications occurred in two patients who underwent laparoscopic resection, both requiring laparotomy, and in one patient in the conventional surgery group who underwent computed tomographic-guided drainage of an abscess. Patients who underwent laparoscopic resection tolerated a regular diet sooner than patients who underwent conventional surgery (3.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 5.7 +/- 1.1 days; P < 0.001) and were discharged from the hospital earlier (4.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.8 +/- 1.1 days; P < 0.001). Overall costs were higher in the laparoscopic group than the open surgery group ($10,230 +/- 49.1 vs. $7,068 +/- 37.1; P < 0.001) because of a significantly longer total operating room time (397 +/- 9.1 vs. 115 +/- 5.1 min; P < 0.001). Follow-up studies with a mean of one year revealed two port site infections in the laparoscopic group and one wound infection in the open group. Of patients undergoing conventional resection, one patient experienced a postoperative bowel obstruction that was managed nonoperatively, and, in one patient, an incarcerated incisional hernia developed that required urgent laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection in patients with chronic diverticulitis is safe, with faster recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with conventional open surgery. Higher cost of operating room usage time makes the laparoscopic technique difficult to justify economically. Simplification of operating room use and better case selection may improve cost-effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach.