Venous function and clinical outcome following deep vein thrombosis

Current Best Practice in the Management of Varicose Veins

This article outlines the current best practice in the management of varicose veins. “Varicose veins” traditionally means bulging veins, usually seen on the legs, when standing. It is now a general term used to describe these bulging veins, and also underlying incompetent veins that reflux and cause the surface varicose veins. Importantly, “varicose veins” is often used for superficial venous reflux even in the absence of visible bulging veins. These can be simply called “hidden varicose veins”. Varicose veins usually deteriorate, progressing to discomfort, swollen ankles, skin damage, leg ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis and venous bleeds. Patients with varicose veins and symptoms or signs have a significant advantage in having treatment over conservative treatment with compression stockings or venotropic drugs. Small varicose veins or telangiectasia without symptoms or signs can be treated for cosmetic reasons. However, most have underlying venous reflux from saphenous, perforator or local “feeding veins” and so investigation with venous duplex should be mandatory before treatment. Best practice for investigating leg varicose veins is venous duplex ultrasound in the erect position, performed by a specialist trained in ultrasonography optimally not the doctor who performs the treatment. Pelvic vein reflux is best investigated with transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVS), performed using the Holdstock-Harrison protocol. In men or women unable to have TVS, venography or cross-sectional imaging is needed. Best practice for treating truncal vein incompetence is endovenous thermal ablation. Increasing evidence suggests that significant incompetent perforating veins should be found and treated by thermal ablation using the transluminal occlusion of perforator (TRLOP) approach, and that incompetent pelvic veins refluxing into symptomatic varicose veins in the genital region or leg should be treated by coil embolisation. Bulging varicosities should be treated by phlebectomy at the time of truncal vein ablation. Monitoring and reporting outcomes is essential for doctors and patients; hence, participation in a venous registry should probably be mandatory.

Delay between clinical presentation and treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and regression of thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

The objective was to investigate the delay between the onset of DVT symptoms and start of anticoagulation in common practice, assess whether this has any impact on the recanalization of venous thrombosis over one year follow up.

METHODS

A prospective observational study on 76 consecutive patients (39 men, 51.3%) with DVT diagnosed using compression ultrasound (CUS). Timing was classified as very early treatment ≤72 hours, early treatment ˂7 days and late treatment ≥7 days from onset of symptoms. Further development of the disease was monitored by CUS in scheduled visits 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of treatment.

RESULTS

Mean delay from symptom onset to the start of anticoagulation was 11.1 days (median 7 days, range 1-42 days) with significant difference (p˂0.05) between proximal (12.9 days, median 30 days) and distal DVT (6.5 days, median 2 days). In less than 25% of all patients, with both proximal and distal DVT, treatment was started very early (≤72 hours), 40 patients (52.6%) received late treatment ≥7 days. There was a positive correlation between delay, average time of complete recanalization (≤72 hours 4.2 months, ≥7 days 5.3 months, p˂0.05) and rate of incomplete recanalization (≤72 hours 7.3%, ≥7 days 30.9%, p˂0.01) in proximal DVT, not in distal DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a delay of ≥7 days in treating in more than half of our patients. The mean interval between clinical onset and start of treatment was significantly shorter and a delay ≥7 days significantly less frequent in patients with distal DVT compared to patients with proximal DVT. A very significant positive correlation between delay in treatment and rate of incomplete recanalization of proximal and distal thrombosis indicates that delayed anticoagulation could be a signal risk factor for the incomplete recanalization and development of PTS.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a prospective trial with venographic and clinical follow-up

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the primary and long-term venographic and clinical results of catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with mean age of 48 (range 15-81) years with acute DVT (symptom duration of less than 2 weeks), extending to high femoral (16 patients) or iliac vein (40 patients) were treated with selective catheter-directed thrombolysis. The mean total dose of 3.8 (range 1.0-8.1) million units of urokinase was administered during a mean of 39 (range 6-72) hours. Endovascular stenting was performed in 9 of the iliac DVT patients.

RESULTS

Complete procedural venographic success was achieved in 79% of patients. Major complications were noted in 7% of patients and the total rate of complications was 13%. Mean venographic follow-up was 3.5 years (range 3 months to 9.6 years); well preserved femoral vein valves and fully recanalized deep crural veins were observed in 83% and 57% of patients. Normal clinical findings in the affected limb were noted during the latest follow-up visit in 67% of patients. Clinical post-thrombotic syndrome occurred in 9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Catheter-directed thrombolysis achieves good primary success with acceptable complication rate and effectively reduces prevalence of post-thrombotic syndrome.

Impact of venous thromboembolism, venous stasis syndrome, venous outflow obstruction and venous valvular incompetence on quality of life and activities of daily living: a nested case-control study

The role of venous stasis syndrome (VSS) mechanisms (i.e. venous outflow obstruction [VOO] and venous valvular incompetence [VVI]) on quality of life (QoL) and activities of daily living (ADL) is unknown. The objective of this study was to test the hypotheses that venous thromboembolism (VTE),VSS,VOO and VVI are associated with reduced QoL and ADL. This study is a follow-up of an incident VTE case-control study nested within a population-based inception cohort of residents from Olmsted County, MN, USA, between 1966 and 1990. The study comprised 232 Olmsted County residents with a first lifetime VTE and 133 residents without VTE. Methods included a questionnaire and physical examination for VSS; vascular laboratory testing for VOO and VVI; assessment of QoL by SF36 and of ADL by pertinent sections from the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) and Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS2) questionnaires. Of the 365 study participants, 232 (64%), 161 (44%), 43 (12%) and 136 (37%) had VTE, VSS, VOO and VVI, respectively. Prior VTE was associated with reduced ADL and increased pain, VSS with reduced physical QoL and increased pain, and VOO with reduced physical QoL and ADL.VVI was not associated with QoL or ADL. In conclusion,VSS and VOO are associated with worse physical QoL and increased pain. VOO and VTE are associated with impaired ADL. We hypothesize that rapid clearance of venous outflow obstruction in individuals with acute VTE will improve their QoL and ADL.

Individually tailored duration of elastic compression therapy in relation to incidence of the postthrombotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We assessed whether individualized shortened duration of elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy after acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is feasible without increasing the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS).

METHODS

At the outpatient clinic of the Maastricht University Medical Centre, 125 consecutive patients with confirmed proximal DVT were followed for 2 years. Villalta scores were assessed on four consecutive visits; 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the acute event. Reflux was assessed once by duplex testing. After 6 months, patients with scores <or=4 on the Villalta clinical score and in the absence of reflux were allowed to discontinue ECS therapy. If reflux was present, two consecutive scores <or=4 were needed to discontinue ECS therapy.

RESULTS

ECS therapy was discontinued in 17% of patients at 6 months, in 48% at 12 months, and in 50% at 24 months. Reflux on duplex testing was present in 74/101 (73.3%) tested patients and was not associated with the onset of PTS. At the 6-month visit, the cumulative incidence of PTS was 13.3%, at 12 months 17.0%, and at 24 months 21.1%. Varicosities/venous insufficiency (present at baseline) was significantly associated with PTS; hazard ratio 3.2 (1.2-9.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a low probability for developing PTS can be identified as early as 6 months after the thrombotic event, and individualized shortened duration of ECS therapy based on Villalta clinical scores may be a safe management option. These findings need to be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial.

Risk factors and underlying mechanisms for venous stasis syndrome: a population-based case-control study

Venous stasis syndrome may complicate deep vein thrombosis (DVT; i.e. post-phlebitic syndrome), but, in most cases, venous stasis syndrome is not post-phlebitic. The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors (including prior DVT) for venous stasis syndrome, and to assess venous outflow obstruction and venous valvular incompetence as possible mechanisms for venous stasis syndrome. This was a case-control study nested within a population-based inception cohort. The study population consisted of 232 Olmsted County, MN residents with a first lifetime venous thromboembolism (VTE) and 133 residents without VTE. Measurements included a questionnaire and physical examination for venous stasis syndrome; strain gauge outflow plethysmography, venous continuous wave Doppler ultrasonography and passive venous drainage and refill testing for venous outflow obstruction and venous valvular incompetence. Altogether, 161 (44%), 43 (12%), and 136 (38%) subjects respectively, had venous stasis syndrome, venous outflow obstruction and venous valvular incompetence. Independent risk factors for venous stasis syndrome included increasing patient age and body mass index (BMI), prior DVT, longer time interval since DVT, and varicose veins. Both venous outflow obstruction (p = 0.003) and venous valvular incompetence (p < 0.0001) were strongly associated with venous stasis syndrome. Increasing age and prior DVT were significantly associated with venous outflow obstruction, while prior DVT, varicose veins and venous stasis syndrome diagnosed prior to the incident DVT were significantly associated with venous valvular incompetence. The risks of venous outflow obstruction, venous valvular incompetence and venous stasis syndrome were higher with left leg DVT. In conclusion, increasing patient age and BMI, prior DVT (particularly left leg DVT), longer time interval since DVT and varicose veins are independent risk factors for venous stasis syndrome. Venous stasis syndrome related to DVT is due to venous outflow obstruction and venous valvular incompetence, while venous stasis syndrome related to older age and to varicose veins is due to venous outflow obstruction and to venous valvular incompetence, respectively.

Incidence and cost burden of post-thrombotic syndrome

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a long-term complication of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), manifesting as swelling, pain, edema, venous ectasia, and skin induration of the affected limb. PTS has been estimated to affect 23-60% of individuals with DVT, frequently occurring within 2 years of the DVT episode. Symptomatic DVT, post-operative asymptomatic DVT, and recurrent DVT are all risk factors for the development of PTS. Treatment of PTS is often ineffective and treatment-related costs represent a healthcare burden. Therefore, prevention of DVT is essential to reduce PTS, and thus improve outcomes and reduce overall healthcare costs. Although recommended by guidelines, appropriate DVT prophylaxis remains considerably underused. This review evaluates the incidence, risk factors, and economic impact of PTS. Increasing the awareness of PTS, and the methods to prevent this complication may help reduce its incidence, improve long-term outcomes in patients, and decrease resulting costs associated with treatment.

How I treat postthrombotic syndrome

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a chronic complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) that reduces quality of life and has important socioeconomic consequences. More than one-third of patients with DVT will develop PTS, and 5% to 10% of patients will develop severe PTS, which may manifest as venous ulceration. The principal risk factors for PTS are persistent leg symptoms 1 month after the acute episode of DVT, extensive DVT, recurrent ipsilateral DVT, obesity, and older age. Daily use of elastic compression stockings (ECSs) for 2 years after proximal DVT appears to reduce the risk of PTS; however, there is uncertainty about optimal duration of use and compression strength of ECSs and the magnitude of their effect. The cornerstone of managing PTS is compression therapy, primarily using ECSs. Venoactive medications such as aescin and rutoside may provide short-term relief of PTS symptoms. The likelihood of developing PTS after DVT should be discussed with patients, and symptoms and signs of PTS should be monitored during clinical follow-up. Further studies to elucidate the pathophysiology of PTS, to identify clinical and biologic risk factors, and to test new preventive and therapeutic approaches to PTS are needed to ultimately improve the long-term prognosis of patients with DVT.

The post-thrombotic syndrome: progress and pitfalls

The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) develops in up to one half of patients after symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and is the most common complication of DVT. Typical features of PTS include chronic pain, swelling, heaviness, oedema and skin changes in the affected limb. In severe cases, venous ulcers may develop. The frequency of PTS is likely to be reduced by preventing DVT with the use of effective thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients and settings and by minimising the risk of ipsilateral DVT recurrence. Use of compression stockings for 2 years after DVT appears to reduce the incidence and severity of PTS but issues remain regarding their use and effectiveness. Future research should focus on elucidating the pathophysiology and risk factors for PTS, assessing the safety and effectiveness of catheter-directed thrombolysis to prevent PTS and evaluating the optimal use of compression stockings to prevent and treat PTS. In addition, new therapies to treat PTS should be sought and evaluated.

The Post-thrombotic Syndrome: The Forgotten Morbidity of Deep Venous Thrombosis

The postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is the most common complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) yet has received little attention from clinicians and researchers. Clinically, PTS is characterized by chronic pain, swelling, heaviness and other signs in the affected limb. In severe cases, venous ulcers may develop. PTS is burdensome and costly to patients and society because of its high prevalence, severity and chronicity. Preventing DVT with the use of effective thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients and settings and minimizing the risk of ipsilateral DVT recurrence are likely to reduce the frequency of PTS. Compression stockings worn daily after DVT appear to reduce the incidence and severity of PTS but questions regarding their use and effectiveness remain. Future research should focus on identifying patients at high risk for PTS, assessing the role of thrombolysis in preventing PTS and evaluating the optimal use of compression stockings in preventing and treating PTS. In addition, new therapies to treat PTS should be sought and evaluated.

Five-year outcome study of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs

OBJECTIVE

Venous disease was evaluated in relation to post-thrombotic syndrome 5 years after deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients treated with a regimen of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin in a Hospital-in-the-Home program.

METHODS

The presence of flow, reflux and compressibility in 51 patients (102 limbs, 54 with DVT and 48 without DVT) was assessed by duplex ultrasound scanning. Blood tests were carried out for prothrombotic screening. Venous disease was related to pathologic severity of post-thrombotic syndrome, characterized by the CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification on a scale of 0 to 6.

RESULTS

In the 102 limbs studied, 30 patients (59%) had an underlying thrombophilic disorder. The most common cause of DVT was postoperation and prolonged immobilization not related to postoperation. The most common thrombophilic abnormalities were anticardiolipin antibody and a deficiency of protein C or S, or both. Twenty-six limbs (48%) had proximal involvement (proximal and proximal plus distal DVT); resolution (recanalization or normal vein) in these limbs was seen in 85% at 6 months and 96% at 5 years. After 5 years, 25 of these proximal DVT limbs (96%) developed reflux and there were 4 limbs in CEAP class 0, 8 in classes 1 to 3, and 14 in classes 4 to 6. All of the 28 limbs (52%) with distal DVT showed DVT resolution by 6 months. After 5 years, 10 limbs (36%) developed reflux, and 13 limbs were in class 0, 12 in classes 1 to 3, and 3 limbs in classes 4 to 6. No DVT was detected in the 48 contralateral limbs, but reflux was detected in 25 limbs (52%), predominately in the superficial veins (16 limbs, 64%).

CONCLUSIONS

The resolution of thrombus was more rapid and complete in patients with distal DVT than in those with proximal DVT. Patients with proximal DVT developed a more severe form of post-thrombotic syndrome that was likely related to the development of deep venous reflux. An important finding of this study was an unexpectedly high incidence of venous reflux in the apparently unaffected limb. Although these non-DVT limbs were not investigated at presentation, our data is consistent with the hypothesis that DVT may result in a more systemic disorder of venous function.

Mechanical thrombectomy for DVT

Deep venous thrombosis is a common source of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Complications include pulmonary embolism and chronic post-thrombotic syndrome. Chronic post-thrombotic syndrome is characterized by extremity pain, edema, venous claudication, skin changes, and skin ulceration. This syndrome is attributed to venous obstruction and valvular damage due to thrombus. The standard treatment of deep venous thrombosis consists of medical management with anticoagulation. Anticoagulation has proven efficacy in prevention of thrombus extension, pulmonary embolus, and re-thrombosis. The role of anticoagulation in post-thrombotic syndrome is unclear. Aggressive endovascular techniques for managing DVT have evolved as a result. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was the first such procedure with demonstrated efficacy, however its acceptance has been limited by perceived risks, time to lysis, and cost. As a result, alternative measures for managing DVT have evolved including mechanical thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombectomy for DVT has the potential to shorten the time for lysis, reduce the risk of thrombolytic agents, and potentially impact cost savings.

Endovascular management of venous thrombotic and occlusive diseases of the lower extremities

Acute complications of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities include pulmonary embolism and venous ischemia. Delayed complications include a spectrum of debilitating symptoms referred to as postthrombotic syndrome (PST). Anticoagulation therapy is recognized as the mainstay of therapy in acute DVT. However, there are few data to suggest any major beneficial effect on PTS, which is thought to be mediated by valve damage and/or occlusive chronic thrombus and venous scarring. Endovascular catheter-directed thrombolysis techniques with pharmacologic thrombolytic agents, used alone or in combination with mechanical thrombectomy devices, have been proven highly effective in clearing acute DVT, which may allow the preservation of venous valve function and prevention of subsequent venous occlusive disease. Definitive management of underlying anatomic occlusive abnormalities can also be undertaken.

The post-thrombotic syndrome: current knowledge, controversies, and directions for future research

The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a long-term complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) that is characterized by chronic, persistent pain, swelling and other signs in the affected limb. PTS is common, burdensome and costly. It is likely to increase in prevalence, since despite widespread use of and improvements in the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of DVT has not decreased over time. About 20-50% of patients develop PTS within 1-2 years of symptomatic DVT, and severe PTS, which can include venous ulcers, occurs in 5-10% of cases. Although there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of PTS, the presence of typical clinical features in a patient with previous DVT provides strong supporting evidence. Objective evidence of venous valvular incompetence helps to confirm the diagnosis in symptomatic patients. Preventing ipsilateral recurrence of DVT, by ensuring an adequate duration and intensity of anticoagulation for the initial DVT and by prescribing situational thromboprophylaxis after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants, is likely to reduce the risk of developing PTS. There is no proven role for thrombolysis of the initial DVT to prevent PTS. Daily use of graduated compression stockings after DVT may reduce the risk of PTS, and may prevent worsening of established PTS. Pending the results of ongoing studies, stockings are recommended in patients with persistent symptoms or swelling after DVT. Future research should focus on standardizing criteria for PTS diagnosis, identification of DVT patients at high risk for PTS, and rigorously evaluating the effectiveness of stockings, thrombolysis, and venoactive drugs in preventing or treating PTS.

Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: A consensus statement (France, March 5-9, 1997)

This consensus document provides an up-to-date account of the various methods available for the investigation of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs (CVI), with an outline of their history, usefulness, and limitations. CVI is characterized by symptoms or signs produced by venous hypertension as a result of structural or functional abnormalities of veins. The most frequent causes of CVI are primary abnormalities of the venous wall and the valves and secondary changes due to previous venous thrombosis that can lead to reflux, obstruction, or both. Because the history and clinical examination will not always indicate the nature and extent of the underlying abnormality (anatomic extent, pathology, and cause), a number of diagnostic investigations have been developed that can elucidate whether there is calf muscle pump dysfunction and determine the anatomic extent and severity of obstruction or reflux. The difficulty in deciding which investigations to use and how to interpret the results has stimulated the development of this consensus document. The aim of this document was to provide an account of these tests, with an outline of their usefulness and limitations and indications of which patients should be subjected to the tests and when and of what clinical decisions can be made. This document was written primarily for the clinician who would like to learn the latest approaches to the investigation of patients with CVI and the new applications that have emerged from recent research, as well as for the novice who is embarking on venous research. Care has been taken to indicate which methods have entered the clinical arena and which are mainly used for research. The foundation for this consensus document was laid by the faculty at a meeting held under the auspices of the American Venous Forum, the Cardiovascular Disease Educational and Research Trust, the European Society of Vascular Surgery, the International Angiology Scientific Activity Congress Organization, the International Union of Angiology, and the Union Internationale de Phlebologie at the Abbaye des Vaux de Cernay, France, on March 5 to 9, 1997. Subsequent input by co-opted faculty members and revisions in 1998 and 1999 have ensured a document that provides an up-to-date account of the various methods available for the investigation of CVI.

The post-thrombotic syndrome

One of every three patients with deep-vein thrombosis of the lower extremities will develop, within 5 years, post-thrombotic sequelae that vary from minor signs to severe manifestations such as chronic pain, intractable edema, and leg ulceration. The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) develops as a result of the combination of venous hypertension due to persistent outflow obstruction or valvular incompetence and abnormal microvasculature or lymphatic function. Among factors potentially related to the development of PTS, recurrent ipsilateral thrombosis plays a major role. Whether the extent and the location of the initial thrombosis are associated with the development of PTS is still controversial. The diagnosis of PTS can be accepted on clinical grounds for patients with a history of venous thrombosis. The combination of a standardized clinical evaluation with the results of compression ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography helps diagnose or exclude a previous proximal-vein thrombosis. Prevention of recurrent thrombosis and use of compression elastic stockings are the cornerstones of PTS prevention. The management of this condition is demanding and often frustrating. Although several surgical procedures have been tested, conservative treatment is largely preferable, as more than 50% of patients either remain stable or improve during long-term follow-up, if carefully supervised and instructed to wear proper elastic stockings. Clinical presentation helps predict the prognosis, being the outcome of patients who refer with initially severe manifestations more favorable than that of patients whose symptoms progressively deteriorate over time.

Deep vein thrombosis outcome and the level of oral anticoagulation therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) resolution and DVT outcomes as functions of the level of oral anticoagulation therapy achieved with warfarin.

METHODS

In 33 consecutive patients, a series of 35 limbs with acute symptomatic DVT was followed throughout 1 year of anticoagulation therapy. All the patients underwent 5 days of intravenous unfractionated sodium heparin therapy that was adjusted in dose to prolong the activated thromboplastin time to 2.0 to 2.5 times the control. In addition, warfarin was administered for a period of 6 months, with a target international normalized ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 3.0. All the patients underwent venous duplex scanning and physical examination at the time of diagnosis and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

At the end of the 1-year study period, the rate of complete DVT resolution was 68%. The median INR values in patients with complete DVT resolution were significantly higher than those of patients with incomplete DVT resolution after 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment with warfarin. In addition, the proportion of patients with INR values below therapeutic range was significantly higher in patients with incomplete DVT resolution than in patients with complete DVT resolution after 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment with warfarin. The presence of occlusive thrombi was associated with incomplete DVT resolution. Of the patients with occlusive thrombi, 62% had chronic venous insufficiency symptoms develop, whereas only 11% of the patients with nonocclusive thrombi (P =.003) had these symptoms develop.

CONCLUSION

Despite 6 months of oral anticoagulant therapy, almost one third of thrombi did not resolve completely. The INR values were significantly higher in those patients with complete DVT resolution. These results suggest that the maintenance of an INR level between 2.0 and 3.0 throughout oral anticoagulation therapy will minimize the rate of incomplete DVT resolution.

Venous function and delayed leg swelling following saphenectomy in coronary artery bypass grafting

Some patients are troubled by leg swelling following saphenectomy long after CABG. Postsaphenectomy venous function in the leg has not, however, been well clarified. To determine whether venous dysfunction caused postsaphenectomy swelling, we measured the maximum venous outflow and time constant (tau) in the leg by venous occlusion strain-gauge plethysmography in 45 patients; a venous Doppler test was also conducted in 33 of the 45 at a mean 57.6 +/- 21.3 months after CABG. The saphenous vein was harvested unilaterally from the lower leg or from both the thigh and lower leg in all patients. Edema was seen in 4 patients (8.9%) and 8 reported leg swelling after saphenous vein harvest (17.8%). Legs were classified into three groups: group 1 consisted of 12 with edema or reports of swelling ipsilateral to the saphenous vein harvest site, group 2 consisted of 33 ipsilateral to the saphenous vein harvest without edema, and group 3 consisted of the 45 nonoperated-on, contralateral legs of the same patients as controls. No significant differences were seen in maximum venous outflow, tau, or the incidence of deep vein reflux among groups. No significant relationship was found between venous function and leg swelling occurring delayed after saphenectomy.

Thrombolytic therapy for venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

Streptokinase, urokinase, tissue plasminogen activator and similar drugs can all cause lysis of venous thrombi and pulmonary emboli, but there is small evidence that accelerated lysis achieves a significantly better clinical outcome, on average, in the shorter or longer term, than heparin alone. Thrombolytic therapy for deep leg vein thrombosis aims to restore flow and to preserve venous valves, and so to prevent chronic post-phlebitic disability, but no trial has convincingly demonstrated that the last can be achieved in more than a few patients. Only a small minority of people with extensive proximal thrombosis develop disabling post-phlebitic venous insufficiency, and there are no good clinical predictors of this outcome. As a result, any widespread use of thrombolytics would bring an immediate risk of major bleeding to many people who will never be destined to develop a clinically important problem. Thrombolytic therapy after venous thrombosis should be avoided except, perhaps, in a few carefully selected patients with severe obstruction. The case for using thrombolytics after recent pulmonary embolism is strongest in the limited number of patients with ongoing hypoxia, respiratory distress, pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure, because thrombolytic therapy often achieves an impressive and almost immediate clinical benefit in this clinical setting. Whether early relief from pulmonary artery obstruction translates into longer-term advantage over heparin remains uncertain, however, because no comparative trial has ever shown these drugs to reduce mortality after pulmonary embolism. In all cases, both the physician and the patient must balance the certainty of an immediate bleeding risk against the uncertainty of a better than marginal real benefit.

Venous Insufficiency 4 Years after an Episode of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Clinical and Plethysmographic Investigation

Objective:

To evaluate the frequency of venous insufficiency following deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Design:

Follow-up 4 years after a verified DVT.

Setting:

University hospital in Malmö.

Patients:

Eighty-seven subjects with venographically verified DVT.

Main outcome measure:

To compare venous function in legs, with and without previous DVT, by venous straingauge plethysmography and its correlation with clinical symptoms and signs.

Results:

Fifty-two per cent of patients described general discomfort from the thrombotic leg at follow-up. Active leg ulcers were found in three patients (3%); there were no signs of venous insufficiency in 33% at clinical examination. Thirty-seven patients (75%) with ≥ 1 cm difference in calf circumference between the thrombotic and contralateral leg had suffered a proximal DVT. The refilling time T90 was pathological in 67% and the muscle pump function (RV) in 55%. In the nonthrombotic leg the corresponding figures were 53% and 40%. Nevertheless a positive correlation was found between RV of the thrombotic leg and the contralateral leg ( r = 0.33) but an even stronger correlation was found for T90 ( r = 0.74).

Conclusion:

Venous insufficiency was found in 60% of legs 4 years after DVT but was also found in 14% of legs without previous thrombosis. This may be caused not only by effects of the thrombosis but also by the ageing process.

Diagnostic value of duplex ultrasound and liquid crystal contact thermography in preclinical detection of deep vein thrombosis after proximal femur fractures

During a prospective clinical study the diagnostic value of the two non-invasive examinations colour-coded duplex ultrasound (Duplex) and fluid crystal contact thermography (LCCT) was investigated in relation to phlebography, the standard examination for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in 112 patients with proximal femur fractures. In 19% of the patients, DVT was diagnosed by phlebography, with the main localisation in the lower leg in 19 of 21 (90%) thromboses. With a negative prediction value of 83%, Duplex is less suitable than LCCT under such difficult examination conditions as the early postoperative period. The specificity of Duplex is 95%, but the sensitivity only 18%. The specificity of LCCT is 85% and the sensitivity 75%. Considering the frequency of postoperative DVT after surgery on the legs, especially hip surgery, a postoperative screening for DVT should become mandatory. LCCT has proved to be a suitable, cheap, non-invasive examination with a negative prediction value of 94%.

Comparison of venous reflux in the affected and non-affected leg in patients with unilateral venous ulceration

In 54 patients with unilateral leg ulceration of purely venous aetiology the only difference in venous reflux between affected and non-affected legs was with respect to the popliteal and crural veins. Deep and superficial venous reflux is common in legs without the skin changes typical of chronic venous insufficiency. The significance of venous reflux in an ulcerated leg cannot therefore be determined without reference to the contralateral, clinically normal, limb. Surgery should be directed at correcting reflux present in the ulcerated limb but not in the unaffected limb. In a minority of patients this entails superficial venous surgery alone, but in the majority such an approach would, ideally, entail correction of deep venous incompetence.