Prognostic variables in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours

Sex differences in carcinoid syndrome: A gap to be closed

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms and related carcinoid syndrome (CS) has markedly increased over the last decades and women seem to be more at risk than men for developing CS. Nevertheless, very few studies have investigated sex differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of CS. However, as per other tumours, sex might be relevant in influencing tumour localization, delay in diagnosis, clinical outcomes, prognosis and overall survival in CS. The present review was aimed at evaluating sex differences in CS, as they emerge from an extensive search of the recent literature. It emerged that CS occurs more frequently in female than in male patients with NENs and women seem to have a better prognosis and a slight advantage in overall survival and response to therapy. Moreover, the disease likely impacts differently the quality of life of men and women, with different psychological and social consequences. Nevertheless, sex differences, even if partially known, are deeply underestimated in clinical practice and data from clinical trials are lacking. There is urgent need to increase our understanding of the sex-related differences of CS, in order to define tailored strategies of management of the disease, improving both the quality of life and the prognosis of affected patients.

A Nomogram to Predict Individual Survival of Patients with Liver-Limited Metastases from Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A US Population-Based Cohort Analysis and Chinese Multicenter Cohort Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) with liver metastasis encompass a wide variety of clinical conditions with various prognosis, no statistical model for predicting the prognosis of these patients has been established. We sought to establish a more elaborative and individualized nomogram to predict survival of patients with liver-limited metastatic GEP-NENs. In addition, this nomogram was validated by both the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and a Chinese multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GEP-NENs with liver-limited metastasis between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the SEER database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze survival outcomes. A nomogram was established based on the independent prognostic variables identified from univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The nomogram was evaluated in both an internal validation SEER dataset and an external validation dataset composed of patients from the Chinese multicenter cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 1,474 patients from the SEER database and 192 patients from the multicenter cohort were included. Age, tumor size, differentiation, primary tumor resection, and liver metastasis resection were identified as independent prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and were verified by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (all p < 0.0001). A nomogram was developed and validated by calibration curves and areas under the curve of the external validation cohort, which showed good consistency and veracity in predicting overall survival.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram was developed for the first time to predict the survival of patients with liver-limited metastases from GEP-NENs. Both internal and external validation demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration of our nomogram. Based on this prognostic model, clinicians could develop more personalized treatment strategies and surveillance protocols.

Radiological and Clinical Efficacy of Intra-Arterial 90Y-DOTATATE in Patients with Unresectable, Progressive, Liver Dominant Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This study was performed to determine if intra-arterial (i.a.) administration of ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE can provide an effective and safe alternative to the accepted standard for i.v. of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in liver-dominant metastases of gastrointestinal pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN). A single site, prospective, preliminary case series study included 39 patients with histologically proven liver-dominant NEN. PRRT in the form of 1.15GBq ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE was given selectively into the liver via radiological catheterization of the hepatic artery, up to four times. The endpoint was radiological response (RECIST). Secondary endpoints assessed clinical well-being post-treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Partial response (PR) was noted in 13% of subjects six weeks post-therapy, increasing to 24% at six months and dropping to 13% at 36 months. Disease progression (DP) was not seen at six weeks, was 5% at six months, and 47% at 36 months. Clinical response based on PS seen in 74% of patients at six weeks, 69% at six months, and 39% at 36 months had PFS and OS, respectively, of 22.7 months and 38.2 months. There was no difference in OS/PFS between those with RECIST PR and SD. One patient had significant toxicity (3%). Use of i.a. PRRT appears to be safe and effective in treating patients with liver-dominant NEN. In addition, the best OS (51 vs. 22 months) was seen when i.a. was used as an upfront treatment of bulky GEP-NEN liver metastases and not after i.v. ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE. The use of i.a. ⁹⁰Y DOTATATE PRRT appears to be safe and effective in treating patients with liver-dominant NEN.

[Treatment of colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases: rationale for neoadjuvant therapeutic concepts]

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases represent the most common secondary malignant liver disease. Data regarding the incidence of colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases are rare due to insufficient documentation in a register. Results regarding neoadjuvant therapy are limited and mostly from retrospective analyses.

OBJECTIVE

A summary and rating of the rationale for neoadjuvant therapeutic concepts for colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases were performed.

MATERIAL UND METHODS

The analysis was based on European and American guidelines and included publications in both German and English languages. The results and recommendations were summarized and a review based on the literature is given.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant treatment of liver metastases is performed with heterogeneous intentions. The selection of biologically favorable tumors as well as the conversion of primarily non-operable into resectable metastases of the liver are classical reasons for neoadjuvant treatment. The rationale for neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal and especially for non-colorectal liver metastases cannot be answered in a consistently coherent way with respect to the current status quo of the literature and guidelines. The creation of treatment strategies in clinical settings follows criteria, such as patterns of metastases, complexity of the resection and biological factors (metachronous/synchronous metastases, prognostic factors).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant treatment in the context of conversion therapy is the standard procedure for metastasized colorectal cancer. The biological selection of favorable tumors as the basis for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable lesions is not a consistently used standard for colorectal cancer. Non-colorectal liver metastases are resected only as part of individual concepts.

Liver metastases in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours - treatment methods

Surgical approaches that allow the safe treatment of multiple, bilateral, large tumours, and that combine extirpative, ablative and interventional therapies, have expanded the population of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) liver metastases (LMs) who can benefit from aggressive treatment of their liver disease. Pre-treatment staging often includes the biochemical assessment of serologic markers such as serotonin, insulin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and chromogranin, even in patients without clinically apparent hormonal excess. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a technique that involves the use of thermal energy to induce coagulation necrosis, thereby destroying tumour cells. Resection plus RFA is increasingly used in patients with bilateral NET LMs. Resection is performed for large or dominant lesions, while ablation is used to treat small lesions. Hepatic arterial embolization, typically termed transarterial embolization, and transarterial chemoembolization have been shown to induce a reduction in tumour size and to ameliorate symptoms of excess hormonal secretion.

Repeat liver resection for pure large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder: a favorable outcome

Background

The pure large cell type is a rare variant of primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder. Few reports have mentioned extended survival. Although a multimodal treatment has been described in the treatment of such rare disease, redo liver resection has not yet been mentioned.

Case report

A 67-year-old lady was found to have poorly differentiated, high grade, pure large cell neuroendocrine tumor of the gallbladder after cholecystectomy for gallstones. After the diagnosis, staging workup showed a lesion in segment IVB/V of the liver, and chromogranin was elevated (982 mcg/L). The patient underwent central inferior hepatectomy and wedge excision of a lesion in segment III (discovered intra-operatively), with hilar lymphadenectomy. Three months after the first liver resection, she developed a new liver lesion II/III and underwent left lateral liver resection. The patient remained disease-free for 4 months following the second liver resection but then developed recurrent liver disease and was started on chemotherapy. Further progression led to multi-organ failure and death at 26 months from initial diagnosis.

Conclusion

This is the first reported repeat liver resection in such a rare disease that has led to extended overall survival. We suggest that a group of selected patients with this rare malignancy, and liver-limited disease, may benefit from repeated liver resection.

Liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

The prevalence of metastatic disease in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is very high (60-80%) and cancer-related death among these patients is generally due to metastatic disease. Numerous treatment options for cure and disease control have been investigated for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). Despite the success of liver directed therapy on slowing tumor progression and palliating symptoms, the chance of being cured by liver resection is 40-50% and only roughly 20% of patients have potentially resectable disease. As such, there has been interest in liver transplantation (LT) as a potentially curative option for patients with unresectable disease. Several criteria have been proposed in order to balance long-term outcomes of patients with NELM and the problem of organ shortage including the Milan-NET criteria, the UNOS criteria and the ENETS guidelines. In the most representative studies, recurrence rate after LT has ranged from 30% to 60% with a 5-year OS ranging from 50% to 97%. This large variability is due to the retrospective nature of the studies available, which used different inclusion criteria. As such, outcomes and the prognostic factors associated with LT for NELM warrant further investigation.

Metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas: A surgeon's plea to centering attention on the liver

Over 50% of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have stage IV disease at presentation and the most likely organ to be affected by metastases is the liver. Hepatic involvement and hepatic tumor burden is a key prognostic factor affecting survival of these patients and 80% eventually die of liver failure due to tumor dissemination within the liver. This commentary explores the efficacy and limitations of systemic treatments in patients with GEP-NETs and liver metastases. Landmark randomized trials using systemic therapies including sandostatin (PROMID), lanreotide (CLARINET), everolimus (RADIANT 3 and 4), sunitinib and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (NETTER-1) have not shown efficacy in reducing liver tumor burden in patients with stage IV GEP-NETs with liver metastases as outlined in this review. Although often overlooked, surgical debulking has been associated with a significant survival advantage in large retrospective studies and in our opinion should remain an important therapeutic option for patients with stage IV GEP-NETs and liver metastases.

Hepatic intra-arterial therapies in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: lessons from clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases are common in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), having a negative impact on disease prognosis. The options for selective therapy in patients with unresectable multiple liver metastases are limited to TACE (transarterial chemoembolization), TAE (transarterial embolization), or SIRT (selective internal radiation therapy).

AIM

To explore the clinical outcome, survival and safety of these therapies in NETs patients.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of consecutive patients (mean age 56.6 years, 59% male) treated at two tertiary university medical centers from 2005 to 2015.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with G1, G2, and low G3 NETs with liver metastases were investigated (pancreatic NET (pNET), 24; small bowel, 16; unknown origin (UKO), 9; rectal, 3; lung, 3; and gastric, 2). Fifty-three patients underwent TACE, three patients underwent TAE, and one patient underwent SIRT. Clinical improvement and tumor response were observed in 54/57 patients (95%), together with marked decreased in tumor markers. The median time to tumor progression following the first treatment was 14 ± 16 months. The median overall survival was 22 ± 18 months, more pronounced in the pNET, followed by small bowel and UKO subgroups. There was a trend for a better survival in patients with disease limited to the liver and in whom the primary tumor was resected.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic intra-arterial therapies are well tolerated in the majority of patients with NETs and liver metastases and associated with both clinical improvement and tumor stabilization for prolonged periods. These therapies should be always considered, irrespective of the presence of extrahepatic metastasis.

Clinical and functional implication of the components of somatostatin system in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies often presenting with metastasis at diagnosis and whose clinical outcome is difficult to predict. Somatostatin (SST) analogs (SSAs) provide a valuable pharmacological tool to palliate hormonal symptoms, and control progression in some NETs. However, many patients do not respond to SSAs or develop resistance, and there are many uncertainties regarding pathophysiology of SST and its receptors (sst1-sst5) in GEP-NETs.

METHODS

The expression of SST system components in GEP-NETs was determined, compared with that of non-tumor adjacent and normal tissues and correlated with clinical and histological characteristics. Specifically, 58 patients with GEP-NETs and 14 normal samples were included. Cell viability in NET cell lines was determined in response to specific SSAs.

RESULTS

Normal samples and non-tumor adjacent tissues presented a similar expression profile, with appreciable expression of sst2 and sst3, and a lower expression of the other receptors. In contrast, cortistatin, sst1, sst4, and sst5 were overexpressed in tumors, while sst3 and sst4 seemed overexpressed in less differentiated tumors. Some SST system components were related to vascular/nerve invasion and metastasis. In vitro, sst1 and sst3 agonists reduced viability in BON-1 cells, while they, similar to octreotide and pasireotide, increased viability in QGP-1 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide novel information on SST system pathophysiology in GEP-NETs, including relevant associations with clinical-histological parameters, which might help to better understand the intrinsic heterogeneity of NETs and to identify novel biomarkers and/or targets with potential prognostic and/or therapeutic value for GEP-NETs patients.

Neuroendocrine liver metastasis: The chance to be cured after liver surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine liver metastasis tumors (NELM) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with varied histologic features and a wide range of clinical behaviors. We aimed to identify the fraction of patients cured after liver surgery for NELM.

METHODS

Cure fraction models were used to analyze 376 patients who underwent hepatectomy with curative intent for NELM.

RESULTS

The median and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 4.5 years and 46%, respectively. The probability of being cured from NELM by liver surgery was 44%; the time to cure was 5.1 years. In a multivariable cure model, type of neuroendocrine tumor (NET), grade of tumor differentiation, and rate of liver involvement resulted as independent predictors of cure. The cure fraction for patients with well differentiated NELM from gastrointestinal NET or a functional pancreatic NET, and with <50% of liver-involvement was 95%. Patients who had moderately/poorly differentiated NELM from a non-functional pancreatic NET, and with <50% of liver-involvement was 43%. In the presence of all the three unfavorable prognostic factors (nonfunctional PNET, liver involvement >50%, moderately/poorly differentiation), the cure fraction was 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistical cure after surgery for NELM is possible, and allow for a more accurate prediction of long-term outcome among patients with NELM undergoing liver resection.

A Novel Nomogram to Predict the Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: an Analysis of the Italian Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis Database

Even though surgery remains the only potentially curative option for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases, the factors determining a patient's prognosis following hepatectomy are poorly understood. Using a multicentric database including patients who underwent hepatectomy for NELMs at seven tertiary referral hepato-biliary-pancreatic centers between January 1990 and December 2014, we sought to identify the predictors of survival and develop a clinical tool to predict patient's prognosis after liver resection for NELMs. The median age of the 238 patients included in the study was 61.9 years (interquartile range 51.5-70.1) and 55.9 % (n = 133) of patients were men. The number of NELMs (hazard ratio = 1.05), tumor size (HR = 1.01), and Ki-67 index (HR = 1.07) were the predictors of overall survival. These variables were used to develop a nomogram able to predict survival. According to the predicted 5-year OS, patients were divided into three different risk classes: 19.3, 55.5, and 25.2 % of patients were in low (>80 % predicted 5-year OS), medium (40-80 % predicted 5-year OS), and high (<40 % predicted 5-year OS) risk classes. The 10-year OS was 97.0, 55.9, and 20.0 % in the low, medium, and high-risk classes, respectively (p < 0.001). We developed a novel nomogram that accurately (c-index >70 %) staged and predicted the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for NELMs.

Neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization

OBJECTIVE

Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization is an emerging treatment option for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). However, the data regarding this treatment are currently limited. This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of Y-90 radioembolization and identifies prognostic factors for radiographic response and survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-eight patients underwent Y-90 radioembolization for NELM at our institution between April 2004 and February 2012. Patients were assessed radiographically (RECIST criteria, enhancement), serologically, and clinically at 1month, and then at every 3months after treatment for tumor response, toxicity, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Median length of follow-up was 17.0months (IQR, 9.0-37.0). Median survival was 29.2months. Three patients (9%) had a radiographic complete response to treatment, 6 (17%) had a partial response, 21 (60%) had stable disease, and 5 (14%) developed progressive disease. Two factors were significantly associated with a good radiographic response (complete/partial response): islet cell histological subtype (p=0.043) and hepatic tumor burden ≥33% (p=0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients requiring multiple Y-90 treatments (HR 2.9, p=0.035) and patients who had previously failed systemic therapy with octreotide/chemotherapy (HR 4.4, p=0.012) had worse survival. Grade 3 serologic toxicity was observed in 2 patients (5%; hyperbilirubinemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase) after treatment. Grade 3 non-serologic toxicities included abdominal pain (11%), fatigue (11%), nausea/vomiting (5%), ascites (5%), dyspnea (3%), diarrhea (3%), and peripheral edema (3%). No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Y-90 radioembolization is a promising treatment option for inoperable NELM and is associated with low rates of grade≥3 toxicity.

Detection of Metastases from Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Prospective Comparison of 18F-TOCA PET, Triple-Phase CT, and PET/CT

The purpose of the investigation was to assess positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT) and the image fusion of PET and CT (PET/CT) in the detection of metastases from gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. In a prospective study, thirty-one patients were consecutively examined using a state-of-the-art PET/CT. PET was performed with a carbohydrated F-18-labeled somatostatin receptor ligand (Gluc-Lys([18F]FP-TOCA) from the base of the skull to the proximal thigh using a Pico-3D PET scanner. CT was performed with a noncontrast low-dose CT (LD-CT) and a venous-dominant contrast-enhanced CT (VD-CT) from the base of the skull to the proximal thigh and a hepatic arterial-dominant contrast-enhanced CT (AD-CT) from the epigastric region using a 16-slice CT. The data sets from PET and CT (LD-CT and VD-CT) were fused automatically. To assess a relative sensitivity of each imaging modality, the total number of metastases by summing the number of metastases depicted for each patient by the highest sensitive modality was used as reference standard. PET, LD-CT, AD-CT, VD-CT, PET/LD-CT and PET/VD-CT showed a lesion-by-lesion based overall detection rate for liver metastases (n=858) of 90.8% (P<0.001), 29.4% (P<0.001), 45.5% ( P<0.001), 73.9% ( P<0.001), 91.5% ( P<0.001) and 100%. PET, LD-CT, VD-CT, PET/LD-CT and PET/VD-CT showed an overall detection rate for lymph node metastases (n=193) of 93.8% ( P<0.001), 25.4% ( P<0.001), 64.8% ( P<0.001), 93.8% ( P<0.001) and 100% and for osseous metastases (n=567) of 98.6% ( P<0.005), 40.7% ( P<0.001), 40.7% ( P<0.001), 100% and 100%. Furthermore, PET revealed 2 (22.2%) of 9 intrapulmonal lesions seen on LD-CT, VD-CT, PET/LD-CT and PET/VD-CT. PET as single modality revealed most liver, lymph node and osseous metastases. The combination of molecular/metabolic with anatomical/morphological information improves the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of metastases in comparison to any single imaging modality. LD-CT cannot replace VD-CT in the detection of liver and lymph node metastases, but was equal in the detection of osseous metastases and identifying of pulmonary lesions.

Nonlinear optical microscopy for label-free detection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which are rare and slow-growing neoplasms, pose a diagnostic challenge as they are clinically silent at the time of presentation. Here, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors were researched by nonlinear microscopy, and results demonstrate that this technique has the capability to identify neuroendocrine tumors in the absence of labels and can, in particular, detect rare neuroendocrine tumor cells, vascular invasion, desmoplastic reaction, and fibroelastosis induced by neuroendocrine tumors. These conclusions highlight the possibility of nonlinear optical microscopy as a diagnostic tool for label-freely differentiating neuroendocrine tumors by these histopathologic features.

Hepatic artery embolization in advanced neuroendocrine tumors: Efficacy and long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Transarterial embolization (TAE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are established treatments for symptom control in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with significant hepatic tumor burden.

AIM

To assess efficacy, toxicity and survival parameters in NET patients undergoing TAE and TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of 50 patients with NETs, who underwent a total of 67 embolization procedures in a period of 9 years. All patients had symptomatic and/or radiological progression, despite previous treatments.

RESULTS

Symptomatic improvement was observed in 75% of patients who underwent TAE and 57% of patients who had TACE (P = 0.36). Radiological response was observed following 73% of embolization treatments delivered and specifically in 82% of all TAE and 62% of all TACE procedures (P = 0.46). Plasma Chromogranin A (CgA) levels were reduced in 65% of the patients following embolization. Patients with increasing serum CgA levels after treatment had reduced median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.0001). Patients on somatostatin analogs (SSAs) at the time of treatment had improved OS (P = 0.013), but not PFS (P = 0.216). Overall, the differences in OS (P = 0.21) and PFS (P = 0.19) between one mode of treatment over the other were not found to be statistically significant. One- and 5-year OS were 65% and 41% for TACE and 90% and 57% for TAE, respectively. The commonest complication was postembolization syndrome and mortality was 4%. Overall, the complication (P = 0.18) and mortality rates (P = 0.22) were not significantly different between TAE and TACE.

CONCLUSIONS

TAE/TACE are beneficial treatments for control of symptoms as well as tumor growth, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. No significant efficacy and survival differences were shown between TAE and TACE. Posttreatment CgA levels and the concurrent use of SSAs were independently associated with survival.

Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for rectal submucosal tumour

BACKGROUND

Rectal submucosal tumours are rare. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted rectal surgery.

METHODS

Patients who received robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) were included in the present study. Clinical outcomes, operating time, length of hospital stay and pathological status were analysed.

RESULTS

There were three patients with gastrointestinal tumours and three patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumours. The mean operating time was 369.2 min and the estimated blood loss was 66.7 ml. There were neither intraoperative complications nor conversions. On pathological examination, the mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 10.3 (range 3-16), the mean distal resection margin was 1.1 (range 0.1-3) cm and all six patients had the circumferential resection margins clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that robotic surgery is feasible and safe, with no morbidity or mortality, and that ISR provides bowel continuity and eliminates the need for colostomy. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Liver transplantation for malignancies

Liver transplantation (LT) has become an acceptable and effective treatment for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with excellent outcomes. More recently, LT has been tried in different primary and secondary malignancies of the liver. The outcomes of LT for very selected group of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) have been promising. Excellent results have been reported in LT for patients with unresectable hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE). In contrast to excellent results after LT for HEHE, results of LT for angiosarcoma have been disappointing with no long-term survivors. Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common primary liver cancer in pediatric age group. Long-term outcomes after LT in patients with unresectable tumor and good response to chemotherapy have been promising. Indication for LT for hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is mainly for patients with unresectable tumors and for palliation of medically uncontrollable symptoms. Posttransplant survival in those patients with low tumor activity index is excellent, despite recurrence of the tumor. More recent limited outcomes data on LT for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer have claimed some survival benefit compared to the previous reports. However, due to the high rate of tumor recurrence in a very short time after LT, especially in the era of organ shortage, this indication has not been favored by the transplant community.

Current status of Interventional Radiology in the management of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP-NETs)

Within the group of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs), several heterogeneous malignancies are included with a variety of clinical manifestations and imaging characteristics. Often these cases are inoperable and minimal invasive treatment offered by image-guided procedures appears to be the only option. Interventional radiology offers a valid solution in the management of primary and metastatic GEP-NETs. The purpose of this review article is to describe the current status of the role of Interventional Radiology in the management of GEP-NETs.

Neuroendocrine tumor of gallbladder with liver and retroperitoneal metastases and a good response to the chemotherapeutical treatment

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder is an uncommon disease. We present the case of a 45-year-old woman with a mass located in the gallbladder, whose diagnosis was based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. The tumor involved the liver and retroperitoneum, and was histopathologically confirmed by liver biopsy as a neuroendocrine tumor grade 3. The patient received chemotherapy with good response, followed by surgery with cholecystectomy and partial hepatectomy.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the systemic administration of a synthetic peptide, labeled with a suitable β-emitting radionuclide, able to irradiate tumors and their metastases via internalization through a specific receptor (usually somatostatin S2), over-expressed on the cell membrane. After almost 2 decades of experience, PRRT, with either (90)Y-octreotide or (177)Lu-octreotate, has established itself to be an efficient and effective therapeutic modality. As a treatment, it is relatively safe up to the known thresholds of absorbed and bio-effective isotope dosages and the renal and hematological toxicity profiles are acceptable if adequate protective measures are undertaken.

Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases

Many management strategies exist for neuroendocrine liver metastases. These strategies range from surgery to ablation with various interventional radiology procedures, and include both regional and systemic therapy with diverse biological, cytotoxic, or targeted agents. A paucity of biological, molecular, and genomic information and an absence of data from rigorous trials limit the validity of many publications detailing management. This Review represents the views from an international conference, for which 15 expert working groups prepared evidence-based assessments addressing specific questions, and from which an independent jury derived final recommendations. The aim of the conference was to review the existing approaches to neuroendocrine liver metastases, assess the evidence on which management decisions were based, develop internationally acceptable recommendations for clinical practice (when evidence was available), and make recommendations for clinical and research endeavours. This report represents the final clinical statements and proposals for future research.

Outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection for neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare the outcomes in patients with hepatic carcinoid tumor metastases treated with open versus laparoscopic liver resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our liver surgery database was performed. All patients who underwent liver resection for hepatic carcinoid tumor metastases were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the surgical approach. Patients with concomitant primary and metastatic liver lesions underwent open resection.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent resection over a 10-year period (21 open and 15 laparoscopic). Both groups were similar in terms of gender, body mass index, tumor size, incidence of carcinoid syndrome, and extent of resection (P > .05). The laparoscopic group had less mean operative time (2.7 vs 5.4 hours), less mean blood loss (158.3 vs 538.9 mL), and a shorter hospital stay (3.2 vs 7.5 days; P < .05 for all). Complications were similar in both groups (20% vs 33%; P = .21). Two laparoscopic cases required conversion. The 3-year disease-free survival for the laparoscopic group was 73.3% compared to 47.6% for the open group (P = .2).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first reported study comparing laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the treatment of liver metastases from carcinoid tumors. Our series confirms that selective cases can safely be managed laparoscopically.

Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represent a heterogenous group of tumors arising from a variety of neuroendocrine cell types. The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs have markedly increased over the last three decades. Symptoms are often absent in early disease, or vague and nonspecific even in advanced disease. Delayed diagnosis is thus common. Chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker but has limitations as does the proliferative marker Ki-67%, which is often used for tumor grading and determination of therapy. The development of a multidimensional prognostic nomogram may be valuable in predicting tumor behavior and guiding therapy but requires validation. Identification of NENs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) allows for SSTR scintigraphy and positron emission tomography imaging using novel radiolabeled compounds. Complete surgical resection of limited disease or endoscopic ablation of small lesions localized in stomach or rectum can provide cure; however, the majority of GEP-NENs are metastatic (most frequently the liver and/or mesenteric lymph nodes) at diagnosis. Selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from advanced surgical techniques including hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Somatostatin analogs are effective for symptomatic treatment and exhibit some degree of antiproliferative activity in small intestinal NENs. There is a place for streptozotocin, temozolomide, and capecitabine in the management of pancreatic NENs, while new agents targeting either mTOR (everolimus) or angiogenic (sunitinib) pathways have shown efficacy in these lesions.

Synchronous Duodenal Carcinoid and Adenocarcinoma of the Colon

Carcinoid tumors are a histological subtype of well differentiated, low to intermediate grade, slow-growing neuroendocrine malignancies capable of secreting bioactive peptides, such as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), chromogranin-A and chromogranin-C. Here we present a case of a duodenal carcinoid that simultaneously occurred with adenocarcinoma of the colon. A 59-year-old male with a past medical history of hepatitis C and hypertension presented complaining of worsening abdominal pain associated with 2 - 3 episodes per week of bright red blood per rectum for the past month. He also reported a 20 pounds weight loss in the last 6 months. Social history was significant for a 15 pack year history. Vitals on admission were within normal limits. Physical exam was significant for right upper quadrant tenderness without guarding, rebound, or organomegaly. Rectal exam revealed no blood or masses. Laboratory results showed iron deficiency anemia with hemoglobin of 9.6 K/mm³. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a 4 mm duodenal polyp. Colonoscopy was terminated early secondary to a large circumferential obstructing mass found in the descending colon. Immunohistochemistry of the duodenal biopsy was positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin-A; consistent with the diagnosis of stage I carcinoid tumor. Biopsy results of the colonic mass showed a stage I well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent a left colectomy and partial duodenectomy; he remains in remission after 2 year of close follow up. When the diagnosis of small bowel carcinoid is made, further screening for other primary neoplasms should be sought to prevent potential late stage diagnosis of synchronous malignancies. This is crucial because patients’ demise usually result from the associate tumor and not the carcinoid component. Finally, we would like to raise clinician’s awareness regarding the incidence of this entity since some of the studies suggest that it is more common than it was previously thought.

Treatment options for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases

Hepatic metastases develop in 85% of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Radical surgery, which involves resection of the primary and liver metastases, is the mainstay of treatment, with 60-70% 5-year survival and 35% 10-year survival rates. However, less than 15% of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) are resectable, owing either to multifocality or the inability to preserve sufficient parenchyma following resection. This article deals with the therapeutic modalities available for nonresectable liver metastases, and the therapeutic options available for management of nonresectable NETLMs are discussed. Targeted therapies for NETLMs include hepatic artery embolization, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiolabeled/drug-eluting microspheres, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and phenol injection. Hepatic artery embolization/transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is associated with 75-100% symptom relief and an objective tumor response varying from 33 to 80%. Other modalities, such as biotherapy, peptide receptor therapy and chemotherapy, target both the primary and metastatic disease. Their effects on NETLMs as a subgroup have not been evaluated. Various therapeutic options are available for the treatment of unresectable NETLMs. Most offer significant symptomatic relief, with only a few comparative studies showing survival benefit. Most of the available evidence is based on retrospective and prospective case series rather than randomized controlled trials. Well-designed studies on existing treatment modalities and the search for newer therapeutic options are required.

Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) most commonly metastasize to the liver. Hepatic resection of NET hepatic metastases (NETHM) has been shown to improve symptomology and survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies before September 2010 was performed to examine the efficacy of hepatic resection for NETHM. As a secondary end-point, the impact of treatment on safety and symptomology were determined and prognostic variables were identified. The quality of each study was also assessed using predefined criteria incorporating 9 characteristics. Clinical outcome was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine included reported survival outcomes with a median 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival of 83% (range, 63-100%), 70.5% (range, 31-100%), and 42% (range, 0-100%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months (range, 13-46 months) and median 1-,3-,5- and 10-year PFS of 63% (range, 50-80 %), 32% (range, 24-69%), 29% (range, 6-66%) and 1% (range, 0-11%), respectively. Poor histologic grade, extra-hepatic disease and a macroscopically incomplete resection were associated with a poor prognosis. Studies reported a median rate of symptomatic relief from surgery in 95% of patients (range, 50-100%).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection for NETHM provides symptomatic benefit and is associated with favourable survival outcomes although the majority of patients invariably develop disease progression.

Multifocal colorectal adenocarcinoma with a synchronous multifocal carcinoid of the small intestine--case report and literature review

The paper presents a case report of coexisting multifocal colorectal cancer and multifocal carcinoid of the small intestine. Our literature review did not demonstrate any report of such case. We emphasize necessity of careful inspection of abdominal cavity during any surgical procedure since small lesions, in particular in the small intestine, may be omitted--as was the case during the initial colectomy in our case. Current epidemiological data are also presented and standards of management for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal carcinoid.

Liver-directed therapies in liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract

Presence of liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumors is a major factor altering both quality of life and prognosis. Surgery is recognized as the sole curative treatment. When it is not possible, radiological directed therapies are crucial, particularly in liver metastases from the small bowel. Thermal ablative therapies as radiofrequency ablation and microwave are alternative treatments alone or in combination with surgery. Hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization, as radioembolization, has been shown to have good clinical, biochemical, and morphological responses when liver burden does not permit ablative therapies. However, technical issues are multiple and there is no randomized study to compare their efficacy. The choice of management depends on liver burden and metastases pattern, but also on origin of the primary tumor, tumor differentiation, and tumor proliferative activity. These patients should benefit of a multidisciplinary management to limit morbidity and mortality.

Surgical treatment of liver metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a distinctive entity, and nearly 10% of patients already have liver metastases at presentation. The management of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NEN-LM) is complex with differing patterns of metastatic presentation. An aggressive approach should be used to resect the primary tumor, to remove regional lymph nodes, and to resect or treat appropriate distant metastases (including liver tumors). Despite having an indolent course, NENs have a significantly reduced survival when liver metastases are untreated. Though a wide range of therapies are now available with a multimodal approach to the treatment, surgical treatment offers the only chance for a significant survival prolongation and/or improvement of symptoms and quality of life. A review of the existing surgical modalities for NEN-LM is discussed in this paper.

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases

In the care of patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases, medical oncologists should work in multidisciplinary fashion with surgeons, interventional radiologists, and radiation oncologists to assess the potential utility of liver-directed and systemic therapies. This paper addresses the various roles and evidence basis for cytoreductive surgery, thermal ablation (radiofrequency, microwave, and cryoablation), and embolization (bland embolization (HAE), chemoembolization (HACE), and radioembolization) as liver-directed therapies. Somatostatin analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and the newer agents everolimus and suntinib are discussed as a means for controlling intra- and extrahepatic disease, along with peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT). Finally, the experience with orthotopic liver transplant for neuroendocrine tumors is described.

Neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary accompanied with stomach adenocarcinoma

A 67 year old male at a regular checkup underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. On performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a lesion about 1.2 cm depressed was noted at the gastric angle. The pathology of the biopsy specimen revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. On performing an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan & positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan, no definite evidence of gastric wall thickening or mass lesion was found. However, lymph node enlargement was found in the left gastric and prepancreatic spaces. This patient underwent laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. On final examination, it was found out that the tumor had invaded the mucosal layer. The lymph node was a metastasized large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with an unknown primary site. The patient refused chemotherapy. He opted to undergo a close follow-up. At the postoperative month 27, he had a focal hypermetabolic lesion in the left lobe of the liver that suggested metastasis on PET-CT scan. He refused to undergo an operation. He underwent a radiofrequency ablation.

Relapse factors for ileal neuroendocrine tumours after curative surgery: a retrospective French multicentre study

AIM

To evaluate the characteristics of postoperative relapse, predictive factors and time to relapse after curative surgery for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of the ileum, without hepatic or other distant metastases.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients entered into the Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines database were collected and analysed retrospectively to identify factors predictive of relapse.

RESULTS

Among 100 patients followed for a median of 56.5 (range 1-290) months, 42 relapsed after a median follow-up of 57.5 (range 6-176) months, with liver lesions in 27 (64.3%). Median disease-free survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 88 months (95% confidence interval 72-115). Disease-free survival was shorter for emergency surgery patients (p<0.01), patients with distant mesenteric lymph-node metastases (p<0.01), with fortuitous diagnosis (p=0.02), with tumour diameter >20mm (p=0.02), and those with multiple tumours (p=0.07). Multivariate analysis retained emergency surgery (odds-ratio 4.04 [95% confidence interval 2.01-8.11]), distant mesenteric lymph-node metastases (odds-ratio 2.53 [95% confidence interval 1.22-5.25]), and multiple tumours (odds-ratio 2.14 [95% confidence interval 1.01-4.50]), as being significantly associated with relapse.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent emergency surgery, with distant mesenteric lymph-node metastases or with multiple ileal tumours relapsed earlier. Closer monitoring for the patients with these risk factors may be required.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Rectum: A 10-Year Review of Management

Neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum constitute ∼19 per cent of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The histologic characteristics of the tumor seem to be an indicative prognostic factor. Optimal treatment of NETS of the rectum has been widely debated, but more recent studies suggest that treatment depends upon the size. The medical records of 37 patients with NETS of the rectum were retrospectively reviewed. We reviewed their presentation, surgical treatment, pathology, and outcome. All pathological specimens were reviewed. Neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum were classified as either well-differentiated tumors, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Evaluating tumor size, we found 35/37 patients had tumors less than 1 cm, 1 patient had a tumor between 1 and 2 cm, and one had a tumor greater than 2 cm. Pathologic evaluation of the tumors revealed that 35 of the tumors invaded the submucosa only, one invaded the muscularis propria, and one invaded the perirectal adipose tissue. The histopathologic features of the tumors revealed that 34 of the tumors were well-differentiated NETS with benign features, one tumor had invaded the submucosa, with angioinvasion, and two tumors were neuroendocrine carcinoma. Thirty-five patients underwent local excision. Eleven had reexcisions for positive margins. Two patients had local excision for recurrence, and one patient underwent low anterior resection (4 cm). Twelve patients had negative margins, 25 had positive margins. Eleven patients underwent reexcision. Six had no evidence of residual disease, and five had persistent positive margins and were offered no further treatment. Nineteen patients had positive margins and did not have reexcision. They all had tumors < 1 cm. Despite half of the lesions being resected with final pathologic positive margins, we have seen no significant influence on recurrence or overall survival. This raises the question of margin clearance in early lesions.

Follow-up of known carcinoid liver metastases: is respiratory-gated t(2) fast spin-echo enough?

PURPOSE

To compare the reliability of T(1)-weighted, T(2)-weighted, and different phases of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the detection and reproducible size assessment of known carcinoid hepatic metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

22 patients with known carcinoid hepatic metastases qualified for the study. Three readers reviewed MRI images twice independently at sessions that were >2 weeks apart. The best sequences for metastases conspicuity, number and size, and reproducibility of size were compared subjectively. Linear mixed models were used to compare the number and size of metastases between readers and sequences, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The best overall sequence rated was T(2) FSE (fast spin-echo). The average numbers of metastases was equivalent using T(1)-weighted arterial and T(2) FSE but less for T(2) FRFSE (fast-recovery, fast spin-echo) or delayed imaging. 1,067 lesions were detected and 66 were measured twice by three readers. There was no significant difference between the sequences or between the readings in size measurement when the same sequence was used. However, there was a difference among sequences for size of metastases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

T(2) FSE can be used as a basic sequence in detecting and monitoring the size of carcinoid hepatic metastases and may serve as the primary sequence in patients with contrast allergy or at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Evaluation of chromogranin A determined by three different procedures in patients with benign diseases, neuroendocrine tumors and other malignancies

CgA is a tumor marker in NET's (neuroendocrine tumors) but different ranges of sensitivity and specificity according to the commercial assay kits used have been reported. Our aim was to compare three commercial available assay kits that use three different methodologies (IRMA, RIA and ELISA) to determine CgA, in a clinical setting: 52 healthy people, 98 patients with benign diseases, 94 patients with non-NET´s malignancies, 20 SCLC and in 79 patients with NET's.

RESULTS

Using a cut-off with a 100% specificity in healthy people (6 nmol/L, 60 ng/ml, and 90 ng/ml, for RIA, ELISA and IRMA, respectively), abnormal serum concentrations of CgA were found in a high proportion of patients with renal failure (76.7% ,86,7% and 93.3% with ELISA; IRMA and RIA, respectively) other benign diseases (excluding patients with creatinine concentrations > 1.5 mg/dl)(40,3%, 50% and 53,2% with ELISA, IRMA and RIA, respectively) or in patients with non-NET´s malignancies (excluding SCLC and patients with renal failure) (59,8% ELISA, 55,4%% IRMA, 37% RIA). The highest CgA sensitivity in SCLC was obtained with ELISA (100%) and in NET´s with ELISA (83.3%) and IRMA (80.3%) (RIA 65.2%). ROC curves comparing healthy people and NET´s or NET´s- benigns showed a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) with ELISA (0.964 and 0.774), or IRMA (0.955 and 0.785), and smaller with RIA (0,806 and 0.691).

CONCLUSIONS

CgA is not a specific tumormarker and abnormal concentrations may be found in non-NET´s. The higher AUC, sensitivity and specificity obtained with the ELISA and IRMA indicates that these are the best techniques to determine CgA.

Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) has increased over the past three decades. Hepatic metastases which occur in up to 75% of NET patients significantly worsen their prognosis. New imaging techniques with increasing sensitivity enabling tumour detection at an early stage have been developed. The treatment encompasses a panel of surgical and non-surgical modalities.

METHODS

This article reviews the published literature related to management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

RESULTS

Abdominal computer tomography, magnetic resonance tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are widely accepted imaging modalities. Hepatic resection is the only potentially curative treatment. Liver transplantation is justified in highly selected patients. Liver-directed interventional techniques and locally ablative measures offer effective palliation. Promising novel therapeutic options offering targeted approaches are under evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases still needs to be standardized. Management in centres of expertise should be strongly encouraged in order to enable a multidisciplinary approach and personalized treatment. Development of molecular prognostic factors to select treatment according to patient risk should be attempted.

Factors predicting response and survival after yttrium-90 radioembolization of unresectable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: a critical appraisal of 48 cases

BACKGROUND

Yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization is a promising treatment option for unresectable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM). This study is the first to evaluate the prognostic variables that influenced radiologic response and survival in patients with unresectable NETLM who were treated with 90Y radioembolization. As a secondary outcome, the impact of this treatment on serologic toxicity was assessed.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients underwent resin-based 90Y radioembolization for unresectable NETLM at a single institution between December 2003 and May 2009. Patients were assessed radiologically and serologically at 1 month and then at 3 month intervals after treatment. Prognostic variables that affected response and survival were determined. The impact of this treatment on serologic toxicity over a 6-month period was assessed.

DISCUSSION

No patient was lost to follow-up. The median follow-up for the patients who were alive was 41 months. The median survival was 35 months (range: 5-63). On imaging follow-up, 7 patients (15%) had a complete response and 19 patients (40%) had a partial response to treatment. Eleven patients (23%) had stable disease and 11 patients (23%) had progressive disease. Five prognostic factors were associated with an improved survival: complete/partial response (P=0.003), low hepatic tumor burden (P=0.022), female gender (P=0.022), well-differentiated tumor (P=0.001), and absence of extra-hepatic metastasis (P<0.001). Three factors were associated with a complete/partial response: female gender (P=0.040), well-differentiated tumor (P<0.001) and low hepatic tumor burden (P=0.041). There was a significant increase in the level of alkaline phosphatase over the 6-month period (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

90Y radioembolization is a promising treatment option for unresectable NETLM. Patients with low hepatic tumor burden, well-differentiated tumor, female gender, and no extrahepatic disease benefit most from treatment.

Surgical management of liver metastases from gastrointestinal endocrine tumors

Liver metastases from endocrine tumors can reduce 5-year survival from 90% to 40% and, in cases of functional gastrointestinal endocrine tumors, lead to a carcinoid syndrome. Complete resection of cancerous disease should be considered in all cases. Indeed, after hepatectomy, prolonged survival (41-86% at five years) can be achieved, with low rates of surgery-related mortality (0-6.7%). Extended liver resection is required in most cases. Percutaneous portal embolization increases the volumetric feasibility of resection, and sequential hepatectomy techniques enable a two-stage resection of both bilobar metastases and the primary tumor. For carcinoid syndrome that does not respond to medical therapy, incomplete resection of liver metastases, by reducing tumor volume, may be indicated to reduce symptoms and halt the progression of carcinoid heart disease. In cases of non-resectable liver metastases in selected patients, liver transplantation can lead to 5-year survival rates as high as 77%.

Prolonged survival after hepatic artery embolization in patients with midgut carcinoid syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery embolization (HAE) is a palliative treatment for patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours. HAE reduces hormonal symptoms, but its impact on survival has been questioned.

METHODS

Biochemical responses and survival in consecutive patients with disseminated liver metastases from midgut carcinoid tumours were studied after HAE. Repeat HAE was performed in selected patients with radiological and biochemical signs of progression.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients who had HAE, the median survival from the first procedure was 56 (range 1-204) months. Prolonged survival showed a strong correlation with reduction of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (P = 0.003) and plasma chromogranin A (P = 0.001) levels. The biochemical response to repeat HAE was similar to that for the first procedure (P = 0.002). The complication rate was low (7.5 per cent), as was the mortality rate (1.9 per cent) within 1 month of HAE.

CONCLUSION

HAE is safe, provides good control of hormonal symptoms, and prolongs survival in biochemically responsive patients. It is a valuable palliative option for patients with midgut carcinoid syndrome due to liver metastases and can be repeated in patients with a favourable response to the first procedure.

Modeling Combined Radiopharmaceutical Therapy: A Linear Optimization Framework

In this paper, we investigate a previously proposed mathematical model describing the effects that an innovative combined radiopharmaceutical therapy might have on the delivery of radiation to the tumor and limiting critical organs. While focused on a specific dual agent therapy, this investigation will prove mathematically that for any two therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals with different limiting critical organs the model provides patient specific conditions under which combination therapy is superior to single agent therapy. In addition, this paper outlines general methods for calculating the amounts of administered radioactivity for each drug required to optimize tumor radiation dose. We also consider extensions of this model to include an arbitrary number of independent radiopharmaceuticals and/or other treatment factors.

Combining anatomic and molecularly targeted imaging in the diagnosis and surveillance of embryonal tumors of the nervous and endocrine systems in children

Combining anatomical and functional imaging can improve sensitivity and accuracy of tumor diagnosis and surveillance of pediatric malignancies. MRI is the state-of-the-art modality for demonstrating the anatomical location of brain tumors with contrast enhancement adding additional information regarding whether the tumor is neuronal or glial. Addition of SPECT imaging using a peptide that targets the somatostatin receptor (Octreoscan) can now differentiate medulloblastoma from a cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Combined MRI and Octreoscan is now the most sensitive and accurate imaging modality for differentiating recurrent medulloblastoma from scar tissue. CT is the most common imaging modality for demonstrating the anatomical location of tumors in the chest and abdomen. Addition of SPECT imaging with either MIBG or Octreoscan has been shown to add important diagnostic information on the nature of tumors in chest and abdomen and is often more sensitive than CT for identification of metastatic lesions in bone or liver. Combined anatomical and functional imaging is particularly helpful in neuroblastoma and in neuroendocrine tumors such as gastrinoma and carcinoid. Functional imaging with MIBG and Octreoscan is predictive of response to molecularly targeted therapy with 131I-MIBG and 90Y-DOTA-tyr3-Octreotide. Dosimetry using combined anatomical and functional imaging is being developed for patient-specific dosing of targeted radiotherapy and as an extremely sensitive monitor of response to therapy. Both MIBG and Octreotide are now being adapted to PET imaging which will greatly improve the utility of PET in medulloblastoma as well as increase the sensitivity for detection of metastatic lesions in neuroblastoma and neuroendocrine tumors.

Carcinoid tumors

Carcinoid tumors are rare, slow-growing neuroendocrine tumors arising from the enterochromaffin cells disseminated throughout the gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary systems. Though they have been traditionally classified based on embryologic site of origin, morphologic pattern, and silver affinity, newer classification systems have been developed to emphasize the considerable clinical and histopathologic variability of carcinoid tumors found within each embryologic site of origin. These neoplasms pose a diagnostic challenge because they are often innocuous at the time of presentation, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach using biochemical analysis, standard cross-sectional imaging, and newer advances in nuclear medicine. Similarly, treatment of both primary and disseminated carcinoid disease reflects the need for a multidisciplinary approach, with surgery remaining the only curative modality. The prognosis for patients with these tumors is generally favorable; however, it can be quite variable and is related to the location of the primary tumor, extent of metastatic disease at initial presentation, and time of diagnosis.

Hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: chemo- or bland embolization?

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive management of hepatic neuroendocrine (NE) metastases improves symptoms and prolongs survival. Because of the rarity of these tumors, however, the best method for hepatic artery embolization has not been established. We hypothesized that in patients with hepatic NE metastases, hepatic artery chemoembolization (HACE) would result in better symptom improvement and survival compared to bland embolization (HAE).

METHODS

Retrospective review identified all patients with NE hepatic metastases managed by HACE or HAE at three institutions from January 1996 through December 2007.

RESULTS

We identified 100 patients managed by HACE (n = 49) or HAE (n = 51) that were similar with respect to age, gender, and primary tumor type. The percentage of patients experiencing morbidity, 30-day mortality, and symptom improvement were similar between the two groups (HACE vs. HAE: 2.4% vs. 6.6%; 0.8% vs. 1.8%; and 88% vs. 83%, respectively.) No differences in the median overall survival were observed between HACE and HAE from the time of the first embolization procedure (25.5 vs. 25.7 months, p = 0.79). Multivariate analysis revealed that resection of the primary tumor predicted survival (73.8 vs. 19.4 months, p < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that morbidity, mortality, symptom improvement, and overall survival are similar in patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases managed by chemo- or bland hepatic artery embolization.