Ethics of palliative surgery in patients with cancer

Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: a systematic review of ethical challenges and palliative care practices

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the ethical dilemma's nurses encounter in end-of-life care and effective palliative care practices. The objectives were to understand key ethical issues, evaluate communication and decision-making strategies, and identify approaches to support nurses and patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of major databases was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies directly relating to nursing ethics, challenges in end-of-life decision-making, and palliative care practices were included. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBVIS-II. Data on ethical issues, palliative interventions, and outcomes was extracted and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Key themes that emerged were: (1) Effective communication and involving patients in decision-making are essential but complex. (2) Nurses face dilemmas around balancing autonomy, beneficence and relational issues. (3) Integrating palliative care principles enhances symptom management and aligns care with patient values. (4) Education and organizational support are needed to equip nurses with skills and coping strategies.

CONCLUSION

Navigating end-of-life care requires addressing interconnected ethical, communication and support needs. While studies provided insights, further research is required on cultural competence training, standardized education programs and longitudinal evaluations.

Scalp Reconstruction With Free Tissue Transfer as a Palliative Surgical Intervention in a High-Risk Population

Microvascular reconstruction of the scalp is frequently indicated in patients with locally advanced tumors, among other etiologies, in a relatively high-risk, older patient population that often has multiple medical comorbidities. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing microvascular scalp reconstruction at Emory University Hospital and Grady Memorial Hospital between 2011 and 2021. Patient demographics, wound characteristics, operative details, and complications were recorded. Statistical analysis using univariate and multivariate models was performed. Forty-two patients underwent 45 microvascular scalp reconstructive procedures during the study period. The median age was 63 years. Wounds were predominantly oncologic (n=38, 84.4%) and frequently involved deeper structures [calvarium (n=38, 84.4%), dura (n=17, 37.8%)]. At a median follow-up of 350 days, 33 patients (73.3%) had healed flaps, 9 (20.0%) had wound healing issues but ultimately successful reconstruction, and 3 (6.7%) experienced flap failure. Most patients (n=33, 80.9%) were discharged home or to a rehabilitation facility, while the remaining 8 patients (19.1%) were discharged to hospice or died. The 30-day mortality was 4 patients (8.9%) and the 6-month mortality was 8 patients (20.5%). There was a statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality (P=0.0001) on univariate analysis and 6-month mortality (P=0.003) on both univariate and multivariate analysis for patients >70 years. While age >70 years is a risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing microvascular scalp reconstruction, mortality was commonly related to underlying disease processes rather than complication of surgery. Microvascular reconstruction for scalp defects has a high success rate and can be offered as a palliative procedure for patients with locally advanced cancers, advanced age, and multiple comorbidities.

Palliative surgery: state of the science and future directions

Palliative surgical procedures are operations that aim to alleviate symptoms in a patient with serious, life-limiting illness. They are common, particularly within the field of surgical oncology. However, few high-quality studies have attempted to measure the durability of improvements in symptoms and quality of life after palliative surgery. Furthermore, many of the studies that do exist are outdated and employ highly inconsistent definitions of palliative surgery. Consequently, the paucity of robust and reliable evidence on the benefits, risks, and trade-offs of palliative surgery hampers clinical decision-making for patients and their surgeons. The evidence for palliative surgery suggests that, with effective communication about goals of care and careful patient selection, palliative surgery can provide symptomatic relief and reduce healthcare burdens for certain seriously ill patients.

When Should Neuroendovascular Care for Patients With Acute Stroke Be Palliative?

Noncurative surgeries intended to relieve suffering during serious illness or near end of life have been analyzed across palliative settings. Yet sparse guidance is available to inform clinical management decisions about whether, when, and which interventions should be offered when ischemic stroke and other neurological complications occur in patients whose survival is extended by other novel disease-modifying interventions. This case commentary examines key ethical and clinical considerations in palliative neuroendovascular care of patients with acute stroke.

The Role of Palliative Surgery for Malignant Bowel Obstruction and Perforation in Advanced Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy: Case Report

The role of palliative surgery in the management of acute complications in patients with disseminated malignancy remains controversial given the complexity of assessing acute surgical risk and long-term oncologic outcome. With the emergence of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, there appears to be an increasing role for historically palliative procedures as a bridge to systemic immunotherapy. This is especially evident in advanced microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer where malignant obstruction and fistula formation are more common and where immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1/PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4) has a high response rate with potential for favorable oncologic outcomes. We present a series of three patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer complicated by malignant bowel obstruction and fistula formation, who having progressed on standard chemotherapy, underwent palliative intervention as a bridge to immune checkpoint blockade with durable and clinically meaningful anti-cancer responses. These cases highlight the need to re-evaluate the role of historically palliative operations in the setting of disease progression for immunotherapy-responsive tumors.

Palliative Total Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Cancers: A Cross-sectional Study of Society of Gynecologic Oncology Members

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate contemporary practices and opinions among gynecologic oncologists regarding the use of total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for palliative intent.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study of the membership of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology utilized an electronic survey to assess the opinions and practice patterns of gynecologic oncologists regarding TPEs. The primary outcome was willingness to consider a TPE for palliative intent, and demographic and practice characteristics were collected for correlation. Qualitative data were also collected. Descriptive statistics are presented, and χ tests, Fisher exact tests, and logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

We included 315 surveys for analysis, for a completed response rate of 23.5%. Approximately half (52.4%, n = 165) of respondents indicated willingness to consider palliative TPE. When controlled for all variables, gynecologic oncologists who were more than 10 years out of fellowship were less likely to perform a palliative exenteration (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.98), whereas those who reported experience with minimally invasive exenteration were more likely to offer it for palliation (odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.73). Fifty-three respondents (16.8%) provided qualitative data. The themes that emerged as considerations for TPE as palliation were (1) symptoms and quality of life, (2) surgical and perioperative morbidity, (3) anticipated overall survival, (4) counseling and informed consent, (5) functional status and comorbidities, (6) likelihood of residual disease, and (7) alternative procedures available for palliation.

CONCLUSION

Half of gynecologic oncologists seem to be willing to offer a palliative TPE, although more-experienced gynecologic oncologists are more likely to reserve the procedure for curative intent.

Rethinking autonomy: decision making between patient and surgeon in advanced illnesses

Patients with advanced illness such as advanced stage cancer presenting with the need for possible surgical intervention can be some of the most challenging cases for a surgeon. Often there are multiple factors influencing the decisions made. For patients they are facing not just the effects of the disease on their body, but the stark realization that the disease will also limit their life. Not only are these factors a consideration when patients are making decisions, but also the desire to make the decision that is best for themselves, the autonomous decision. Also included in this process for the patient facing the possible need for an intervention is the surgeon. While patient autonomy remains one of the main principles within medicine, guiding treatment decisions, there is also the surgeon's autonomy to be considered. Surgeons determine if there is even a possible intervention to be offered to patients, a decision making process that respects surgeons' autonomous choices and includes elements of paternalism as surgeons utilize their expertise to make decisions. Included in the treatment decisions that are made and the care of the patient is the impact patients' outcomes have on the surgeon, the inherent drive to be the best for the patient and desire for good outcomes for the patient. While both the patient's and surgeon's autonomy are a dynamic interface influencing decision making, the main goal for the patient facing a palliative procedure is that of making treatment decisions based on the concept of shared decision making, always giving primary consideration to the patient's goals and values. Lastly, regardless of the decision made, it is the responsibility of surgeons to their patients to be a source of support through this challenging time.

Shared decision-making for the elderly patient with a surgical condition

Straight talking

Management of intestinal obstruction in advanced malignancy

Patients with incurable, advanced abdominal or pelvic malignancy often present to acute surgical departments with symptoms and signs of intestinal obstruction. It is rare for bowel strangulation to occur in these presentations, and spontaneous resolution often occurs, so the luxury of time should be afforded while decisions are made regarding surgery. Cross-sectional imaging is valuable in determining the underlying mechanism and pathology. The majority of these patients will not be suitable for an operation, and will be best managed in conjunction with a palliative medicine team. Surgeons require a good working knowledge of the mechanisms of action of anti-emetics, anti-secretories and analgesics to tailor early management to individual patients, while decisions regarding potential surgery are made. Deciding if and when to perform operative intervention in this group is complex, and fraught with both technical and emotional challenges. Surgery in this group is highly morbid, with no current evidence available concerning quality of life following surgery. The limited evidence concerning operative strategy suggests that resection and primary anastomosis results in improved survival, over bypass or stoma formation. Realistic prognostication and involvement of the patient, care-givers and the multidisciplinary team in treatment decisions is mandatory if optimum outcomes are to be achieved.

Bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents: a review of the moral challenges

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery for children and adolescents is becoming widespread. However, the evidence is still scarce and of poor quality, and many of the patients are too young to consent. This poses a series of moral challenges, which have to be addressed both when considering bariatric surgery introduced as a health care service and when deciding for treatment for young individuals. A question based (Socratic) approach is applied to reveal underlying moral issues that can be relevant to an open and transparent decision making process.

DISCUSSION

A wide range of moral issues with bariatric surgery for children and adolescents is identified in the literature. There is a moral imperative to help obese minors avoiding serious health problems, but there is little high quality evidence on safety, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness for bariatric surgery in this group. Lack of maturity and family relations poses a series of challenges with autonomy, informed consent, assent, and assessing the best interest of children and adolescents. Social aspects of obesity, such as medicalization, prejudice, and discrimination, raise problems with justice and trust in health professionals. Conceptual issues, such as definition of obesity and treatment end-points, present moral problems. Hidden interests of patients, parents, professionals, industry, and society need to be revealed.

SUMMARY

Performing bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents in order to discipline their behavior warrants reflection and caution. More evidence on outcomes is needed to be able to balance benefits and risks, to provide information for a valid consent or assent, and to advise minors and parents.

In-hospital and long-term outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignancy

BACKGROUND

Although percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is widely performed for nutrition or palliation, PEG-associated outcomes in cancer patients remain poorly described. We examined the safety and benefits of PEG placement in this population at our institution.

STUDY DESIGN

A 5-year retrospective review of patients with malignancy (excluding head/neck and thoracic malignancy) who underwent PEG at our institution was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients with malignancy underwent PEG; 33.9% had hematologic malignancy, 66.1% had nonhematologic malignancy, and 44.4% had metastatic disease. Indications for PEG were enteral access (73%) and gastric decompression/management of obstructive symptoms (27%). Few patients achieved independence from total parenteral nutrition (22%) or diet advancement (24.6%). Overall rates of major complications (eg, aspiration, tube dislodgement/leakage, bleeding, visceral injury, respiratory failure after procedure, and cardiac arrest) and minor complications (eg, superficial infection and ileus) were 10.2% and 11.3%, respectively. All-cause in-hospital mortality was high (19.6%) and was associated with ICU admission (p = 0.018), earlier bone marrow transplantation (p = 0.022), steroid treatment (p = 0.024), and lower preoperative albumin (p = 0.003). Code status was changed after PEG in 44 patients from full code to DNR/do no intubate or comfort measures only.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in this study population was associated with major procedure-related complications. The majority of patients failed to achieve total parenteral nutrition independence or advancement of diet. Nearly 25% of patients declined aggressive resuscitation strategies after undergoing surgery for PEG. This study cautions to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of PEG placement in this patient population. Prospective studies are needed to uncover factors affecting the decision process and patient selection.

Aggressive surgical palliation for advanced girdle tumours

Background:

The surgical management of advanced, incurable, malignant disease presents particular ethical and technical challenges. The clear goal is palliation and the surgical futility must be avoided. This case series presents some particular challenges in end-of-life surgery.

Materials and Methods:

Fifteen patients referred with advanced malignant disease involving a limb girdle were reviewed.

Results:

In one case, a patient pleaded for surgery after initially requesting a delay to seek treatment from a Chinese Traditional Herbalist. The increase in tumour bulk led to problems with surgery and the patient died in a hospital a few weeks later. This case illustrates ‘futility’ not recognized and encountered. The remaining 14 patients exhibited positive palliation with improved quality of dying and appreciation expressed by patients, relatives and staff.

Conclusion:

In selected cases, with a skilled and experienced surgical team, patients with advanced malignant disease can still benefit from aggressive surgical palliation. The margin of error is small between palliation being attempted and futility being achieved. This considerably adds to the challenge of end-of-life surgery.

Strategies for diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction

Small bowel obstruction, which is caused by a variety of etiological factors and mainly manifests as abdominal pain, vomiting and distension, is one of the most common acute abdomens. A rapid and accurate diagnosis of small bowel obstruction is needed to give reasonable and effective treatment to avoid its rapid deterioration. In this paper we discuss the strategies for diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction through comparing different imaging methods for diagnosis of small bowel obstruction and reviewing the current situation of diagnosis and treatment of the disease in terms of pharmacotherapy, gastrointestinal decompression, and surgical intervention.

Defunctioning stoma in high ASA grade, aged patients, with bowel occlusion due to advanced cancer: is it still worthwhile?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the role of defunctioning stoma (DS) in elderly high-risk patients with bowel obstruction from advanced colorectal cancer, by exploring consistent variables of outcome, because every other procedure was unfeasible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 6-year survey in a single surgery unit (between 1999 and 2004) was retrospectively evaluated, allowing to collect a cohort of 75 patients, aged over 65, who overall presented such critical condition. Pre-operatively, American Society of Anaesthesiologist grade classification was used. Post-operative course was monitored by focusing on gauging symptom relief. So, a validated assessment scale was employed to evaluate physical distress symptoms, graduated on a Likert scale and compared at baseline and day 7, on days 7 and 30, post-operatively. Length of hospital stay (LHS), morbidity, in-hospital (within 30 days) and overall mortality (within 6 months) were also assessed. Paired t test was used as statistical analysis to ascertain improvement of symptoms.

RESULTS

All symptoms improved significantly (range, p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) within the surveyed time, with exception of vomiting on day 30 (p = 0.14). Average LHS was 22.8 (standard deviation, +/-3.856) days. Overall morbidity was detected in 68 (91%) patients. In-hospital and overall mortality rates accounted for 27 (35.8%) patients and for 48 (100%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of DS was effective to improve symptom relief but was poor in terms of morbidity and mortality control. So, ethical concerns have to be addressed, and medical treatment or stenting for left-side obstructions only should be considered as alternative procedures.

Utilisation of specialist care in patients with incurable rectal cancer. a population-based study from Western Norway

INTRODUCTION

About 25% of patients with rectal cancer have incurable disease at the time of diagnosis. In the current study from Western Norway (population of 981 000) we focused on the utilisation of specialist care in patients with primarily incurable rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2002, 1 167 patients were diagnosed with rectal cancer, of whom 297 (25%) had incurable disease, according to consecutive and prospective reporting to the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Consumption of specialist care facilities was studied with regard to outpatient contacts, hospital admissions, and various treatment modalities. Data were analysed with regard to age, sex, marital status, type of residence, and geographical access to hospital facilities. Data were available for 287 patients (97%).

RESULTS

The median age was 77 years. Elderly patients (>77 years) more often lived in nursing homes without a spouse. About 60% of the patients were treated with major surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, either alone or in combination. Of those who did not receive such treatment, 87% were elderly. Oncological treatment, either alone or combined with surgery, predicted increased hospital admissions and outpatient contacts. Age >77 years predicted fewer hospital admissions. Survival varied statistically significantly with the various treatment modalities, and was highest for major resections combined with oncological treatment. The majority of the patients living at home died in hospitals (54%) and only 26% died in their homes, while two-thirds of residents of nursing homes died there.

DISCUSSION

Patients with primary incurable rectal cancer are heterogeneous with regard to their needs of treatment. While younger patients receive extensive tumour-related treatment, elderly patients are most commonly treated according to their symptoms. Prospective studies of the effect of various treatment options on the ease of symptoms and improved quality of life in unselected populations are needed.

Palliative surgery for rectal cancer in a national cohort

OBJECTIVE

Whether resection of the primary tumour is of benefit to patients with incurable rectal cancer (RC) remains a matter of debate. In this study we analyse prospectively recorded data from a national cohort.

METHOD

Among 4831 patients diagnosed with RC between 1997 and 2001, 838 (17%) patients were treated with palliative surgery. Patients were stratified according to disease stage, age and type of surgery.

RESULTS

A significantly longer median survival, 12 (range 10-13) months, was observed in patients treated with resection of the primary tumour compared with 5 (range 4-6) months in patients treated with nonresective procedures (P < 0.001). Median survival in months was significantly (P < 0.001) related to age (13; < 60 years of age, 10; 60 to 69 years, 7; 70 to 79 years, 6; >/= 80 years of age). In patients over 80 years, survival was similar regardless of the treatment. Thirty-day mortality varied from 2.5% to 20%, according to age groups.

CONCLUSION

The longer survival observed in patients with resection of the primary tumour may partly be explained by patient selection. Elderly patients (>/= 80 years) had a similar survival, irrespective of resection of the primary tumour or not. Careful consideration of the individual patient, extent of disease and treatment-related factors are important in decision-taking for palliative treatment for patients with advanced RC.

Management of malignant bowel obstruction

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common and distressing outcome particularly in patients with bowel or gynaecological cancer. Radiological imaging, particularly with CT, is critical in determining the cause of obstruction and possible therapeutic interventions. Although surgery should be the primary treatment for selected patients with MBO, it should not be undertaken routinely in patients known to have poor prognostic criteria for surgical intervention such as intra-abdominal carcinomatosis, poor performance status and massive ascites. A number of treatment options are now available for patients unfit for surgery. Nasogastric drainage should generally only be a temporary measure. Self-expanding metallic stents are an option in malignant obstruction of the gastric outlet, proximal small bowel and colon. Medical measures such as analgesics according to the W.H.O. guidelines provide adequate pain relief. Vomiting may be controlled using anti-secretory drugs or/and anti-emetics. Somatostatin analogues (e.g. octreotide) reduce gastrointestinal secretions very rapidly and have a particularly important role in patients with high obstruction if hyoscine butylbromide fails. A collaborative approach by surgeons and the oncologist and/or palliative care physician as well as an honest discourse between physicians and patients can offer an individualised and appropriate symptom management plan.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer: a national prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

At the time of diagnosis, approximately one third of patients with rectal cancer present with advanced disease. In this study we focus on a group of patients with primary advanced rectal cancer considered as not operable. We address various clinical aspects relevant for decision-making in a group of patients in need of palliative care.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 2001, 4831 consecutive patients with rectal cancer were prospectively registered in the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. In this national population-based cohort, 386 patients (8 percent) without surgical interventions were identified. These patients comprise the study population. Clinical characteristics and survivals were addressed.

RESULTS

Patients not surgically treated were significantly older compared with other treatment groups (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 72-86 vs. median age, 71 years; interquartile range, 62-79 years) (P<0.001). Median survival time was 4.5 (range, 3.5-5.4) months, regardless of age, gender, or hospital category. Patients who received radiotherapy had a significantly increased survival (P<0.001) compared with patients not treated with radiation, with a median survival time of 10.2 (range, 7.3-12.1) months vs. 2.8 (range, 2.1-3.6) months, respectively. Use of chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. In multivariate analysis, only stage of disease and radiotherapy were independent predictors of better survival.

CONCLUSION

Higher age and comorbidity seem to influence choice of treatment in this subgroup of patients with advanced rectal cancer disease. In nonsurgically treated patients, radiotherapy was associated with an improved survival. Our prospective, population-based cohort study emphasizes the dismal prognosis of these patients, which also should challenge our efforts and clinical approaches in palliative care.

Surgery as a bridge to palliative chemotherapy in patients with malignant bowel obstruction from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a feature of the clinical course of 10-28% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and is associated with a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in palliative chemotherapy regimens have prolonged survival in patients with stage IV CRC. Few reports exist that describe outcomes in patients who have had surgery for MBO and subsequent chemotherapy as part of their treatment. The objective of this study was to review surgical outcomes in patients with MBO for CRC and to evaluate the extent to which surgery can serve as a bridge to palliative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients who presented with MBO and had surgical treatment were identified from a prospectively kept database at a single tertiary care center between 09/99 and 08/04. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and clinical and outcomes data were abstracted.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were identified who had surgery as part of the treatment for MBO from CRC. Operations included resections, bypasses and stoma creation. Overall, 80% of patients were able to tolerate solid food post-operatively and return home. The median survival for the entire cohort was 3.5 months. Seven patients died within 30 days of surgery. Of the remainder, 24 patients were palliated with surgery alone and 16 patients ultimately received palliative chemotherapy. Survival in the final cohort was significantly prolonged (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgery can adequately palliate a substantial proportion of patients with MBO from CRC with acceptable morbidity and mortality. In addition, in a subset of patients it can facilitate palliative chemotherapy that is associated with improved overall survival.

Quality of life assessment in surgical oncology trials

Integrating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as an endpoint for randomized surgical trials provides valuable insight into the patients' perspective on treatment outcome. Health related quality of life data also play a role in ensuring fully informed consent, determining treatment options and informing treatment decision making. However, few randomized surgical trials have been conducted that meet the minimum requirements for rigorous HRQL assessment and, despite increasing efforts to improve the reporting of randomized trials, many are still not adequately performed. Such methodologic limitations may influence trial findings for HRQL outcomes and undermine the ability of the data collected to inform clinical practice. This review describes key methodological aspects of HRQL assessment that are required in randomized trials to ensure that data are robust. This includes choice of HRQL instrument, the method and timing of assessments and data analysis and presentation. The review also makes recommendations for future research in this area.

The Surgeon and Palliative Care

The incidence of cancer will continue to rise in the United States as the population ages. Despite the many advances in cancer prevention, detection, and treatment of neoplastic diseases, the number of people succumbing to their cancers will similarly increase. As these patients encounter symptoms toward the end of life, palliative means, both surgical and nonsurgical, must be employed to alleviate pain and suffering. This article reviews the definitions of palliative care, methods for evaluating quality of life and effect of interventions, unique aspects of surgical palliation, attitudes of surgeons concerning palliative surgery, and data from palliative surgery studies.

Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in surgical oncology

PURPOSE

There is debate about the value of measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) in clinical trials in oncology because of evidence suggesting that HRQL does not influence clinical decisions. Analysis of HRQL in surgical trials, however, may inform decision making because it provides detailed assessment of the immediate detrimental short-term impact of surgery on HRQL that needs to be considered against the long-term survival benefits and functional outcomes of surgery. This study evaluated whether HRQL in randomized trials in surgical oncology contributes to clinical decision making.

METHODS

A systematic review identified randomized trials in surgical oncology with HRQL. Trials were evaluated independently by two reviewers and the value of HRQL in clinical decision making was categorized in three ways: whether trial investigators reported that HRQL influenced final treatment recommendations, whether trial investigators reported that HRQL would be useful for informed consent, and whether HRQL was assessed robustly according to predefined criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-three randomized trials with valid HRQL questionnaires were identified; 22 (67%) concluded that HRQL outcomes influenced treatment decisions or provided valuable data for informed consent, and seven of these trials had robust HRQL design. Another five trials had robust HRQL design but investigators reported that HRQL outcomes were not clinically important enough to influence treatment recommendations.

CONCLUSION

In surgical trials in oncology, HRQL informed clinical decision making. It is recommended that HRQL be included in relevant surgical trials, and that information be used to inform clinicians and patients about the impact of surgery on short- and long-term HRQL.

The art of surgery in the 21st century: based on natural sciences and new ethical dimensions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the future, new surgical techniques will only be introduced in clinical practice if evidence-based results--frequently the results of controlled clinical trials--are presented. Unlike any other medical discipline, surgeons provide their diagnostic and operative skills through the surgeons' hand and the use of technical equipment, which ranges from instruments and devices employed during operation to the use of surgical robots.

RESULTS

Analysing the fundaments of surgery on the turn of the century, there is only a little doubt about the increasing impact of data deriving from natural sciences on knowledge in medicine and management of diseases. The natural scientific method of detecting, measuring, and verifying facts is the methodological basis of surgery as well. The autonomy of the surgeon's clinical decision making is significantly restricted by the definition of guidelines. They shift the decision from a single patient to a collective panel. Patient safety and the efficiency of new treatment modalities compared with previous standards are the criteria for the judgement of innovative surgery today. The communication and interaction between surgeon-scientist and patients is guaranteed legally by written consensus. But beside of the high probability of benefit from therapy and written consensus, the surgeon-patient relation is determined by these factors: limitation of time for care of an individual patient, increase of time for administration and documentation, increase of bureaucratic barriers for medical research, and health cost constraints.

CONCLUSION

The medical mandate to cure a sick patient is an individual mandate to take action. Measures, numbers, and images are only preconditions for a surgeon's action in daily clinical work; they can never replace it. The call for an ethical imperative in scientific surgery that is dependent on technology is justified when the state of science and uncritical use of surgical skills and financial constraints have major impact on providing medical care.

Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey

GOALS OF THE STUDY

From the perspective of patient autonomy, the family is often looked upon as a troublemaker in medical decision-making. The question remains open as to whether it is possible to do justice to the autonomy of the individual patient and to the claims of his family at the same time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A clinical study was undertaken when both patients and dependents were interviewed. One hundred people (50 pairs) participated in this study and could be analyzed. A questionnaire consisting of 15 items was used and was evaluated to see if and how the attitudes concerning medical decision-making differ between patient and dependent.

RESULTS

The majority of the interviewees (89%) agreed with the opinion that medical decisions should be made jointly by the patient, the family, and the doctor. Ninety-three percent approved of the claim to inform not only the patient, but also the family. Seventy percent of the patients and 54% of the dependents think that the family is entitled to have a say in matters concerning medical decision-making, only 30% of the patients, but 42% of the dependents argued against this view. Eighty-four percent of the patients argued against a change in this right at the end of life, which was approved by 32% of the family members.

CONCLUSIONS

The family plays a central role in medical decision-making. This could be shown by a survey among patients with malignant diseases and their dependents. These initial findings must be verified in a larger population. The increased inclusion of the family in the process of medical decision-making corresponds in general to the expressed will of the patients. The model of shared decision-making is favored by values which both the family and the patient have in common. Thus, a family-based decision-making theory needs to be formulated in the future.