1
|
Ayoub M, Faris C, Chumbe JT, Anwar N, Chela H, Daglilar E. Outpatient use of antibiotics in uncomplicated diverticulitis decreases hospital admissions. Immun Inflamm Dis 2024; 12:e70031. [PMID: 39329247 PMCID: PMC11427943 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.70031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recently, antibiotics use in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (AD) has been controversial in Europe. The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) in their 2015 guidelines recommend their selective use. Our study highlights their role in outpatient management. METHODS We queried the Diamond Network through TriNetX-Research Network including 92 healthcare organizations. We included large intestine diverticulitis without perforation, abscess or bleeding. Exclusion criteria included any of sepsis criteria, CRP > 15 mg/L, immunodeficiency or HIV, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, history of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes or any of the following in the 3 months before study date; clostridium difficile (C. diff) infection, diverticulitis or antibiotics. Patients with AD were divided into two cohorts; patients on antibiotics, and patients not on antibiotics. Cohorts were compared after propensity-score matching (PSM). RESULTS 214,277 patients met inclusion criteria. 58.9% received antibiotics, and 41% did not. After PSM, both cohorts had 84,320. Rate of hospital admission was lower in the antibiotic group (3.3% vs 4.2%, p < .001). There was a statistical difference between ICU admission (0.1% vs 0.15%, p < .01) and the rate of bowel perforation, peritonitis, abscess formation or bleeding (1.3% vs 1.4%, p = .044). There was no difference in mortality (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = .11), C. diff (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = .9), colectomies (0.2% vs 0.2%, p = .33), or Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) (0.1% vs 0.1%, p = .28). CONCLUSION Outpatient use of antibiotics in patients with uncomplicated AD is associated with lower rates of hospital admissions and complications without changing mortality rate or surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ayoub
- Charleston Area Medical Center - West Virginia University Charleston Division, Internal Medicine Department, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Carol Faris
- Surgery Department, Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia, USA
| | - Julton Tomanguillo Chumbe
- Charleston Area Medical Center - West Virginia University Charleston Division, Internal Medicine Department, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Nadeem Anwar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University School of Medicine - Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Harleen Chela
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University School of Medicine - Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Ebubekir Daglilar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University School of Medicine - Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kollatos C, Sköldberg F, Graf W. Evaluation of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis: a national registry-based study. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae109. [PMID: 38713610 PMCID: PMC11075766 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic lavage (LPL) has been suggested for treatment of non-feculent perforated diverticulitis. In this observational study, the surgical treatment of diverticular disease in Sweden outside prospective trials was investigated. METHODS This population-based study used the National Patient Register to identify all patients in Sweden with emergency admissions for diverticular disease, as defined by ICD codes from July 2014 to December 2020. Demographics, surgical procedures and outcomes were assessed. In addition, register data since 1997 were retrieved to assess co-morbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, and previous admissions for diverticular disease. RESULTS Among 47 294 patients with emergency hospital admission, 2035 underwent LPL (427 patients) or sigmoid resection (SR, 1608 patients) for diverticular disease. The mean follow-up was 30.8 months. Patients selected for LPL were younger, healthier and with less previous abdominal surgery for diverticular disease than those in the SR group (P < 0.01). LPL was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean 9.4 versus 14.9 days, P < 0.001) and lower 30-day mortality (3.5% versus 8.7%, P < 0.001). Diverticular disease-associated subsequent surgery was more common in the SR group than the LPL group except during the first year (P < 0.001). LPL had a lower mortality rate during the study period (stratified HR 0.70, 95% c.i. 0.53-0.92, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic lavage constitutes a safe alternative to sigmoid resection for selected patients judged clinically to require surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Kollatos
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Filip Sköldberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Wilhelm Graf
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams B, Gupta A, Koller SD, Starr TJ, Star MJH, Shaw DD, Hakim AH, Leinicke J, Visenio M, Perrone KH, Torgerson ZH, Person AD, Ternent CA, Chen KA, Kapadia MR, Keller DS, Elnagar J, Okonkwo A, Gagliano RA, Clark CE, Arcomano N, Abcarian AM, Beaty JS. Emergency Colon and Rectal Surgery, What Every Surgeon Needs to Know. Curr Probl Surg 2024; 61:101427. [PMID: 38161059 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2023.101427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Williams
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University Southern California, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Abhinav Gupta
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University Southern California, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Sarah D Koller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University Southern California, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Tanya Jt Starr
- Health Corporation of America, Midwest Division, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Darcy D Shaw
- Health Corporation of America, Midwest Division, Kansas City, KS
| | - Ali H Hakim
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Jennifer Leinicke
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Michael Visenio
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Kenneth H Perrone
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Austin D Person
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
| | - Charles A Ternent
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
| | - Kevin A Chen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Muneera R Kapadia
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Deborah S Keller
- Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA; Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA
| | - Jaafar Elnagar
- Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Arcomano
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ariane M Abcarian
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL; Cook County Health, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paasch C, De Santo G, Berndt N, Strik MW, Lefering R, Siegel R. Feasibility of laparoscopic resection for perforated diverticulitis: a retrospective observational study of 77 consecutive patients. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:632-639. [PMID: 36062887 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2122006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perforated colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal contamination (PCD) is a surgical emergency with high morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, open surgery as a Hartmann procedure (HP) has been performed. Feasibility of the laparoscopic approach (LA) either with primary anastomosis (PA) or as an HP has been shown, but evidence and implementation into daily routine remain low. We analysed all patients with PCD and emergency surgery at our institution to compare post-operative outcomes between LA and open surgery. Our results should add more evidence about the potential benefit of LA in treating PCD. METHODS This retrospective analysis conducted at a tertiary care centre in Germany included all patients with PCD undergoing emergency surgery between June 2007 and February 2019. Mortality and postoperative morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo-Classification are the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were stoma-free survival and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were identified (41 female/36 male; median age 67.9 years). Sixty patients underwent a LA (conversion in 9 of 60, 15%). PA has been performed in 25 of 77 patients (22 LA, 3 with open surgery). Severe complications and death (Clavien-Dindo-Classification grade IIIb-V) were lower in patients with LA (17/60, 28%) compared to open surgery (9/17, 53%; p = 0.082) as well as the length of hospital stay (LOS; LA 9 days vs. open surgery 17 days; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION The LA is feasible in the majority of patients with PCD and may be warranted as a routine in emergency surgery. Although limited by a selection bias of this retrospective study, the LA seems to reduce morbidity and LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Paasch
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical University, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gianluca De Santo
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nadja Berndt
- Medical School, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin W Strik
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf Lefering
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Robert Siegel
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Asgari M, Magerand L, Manfredi L. A review on model-based and model-free approaches to control soft actuators and their potentials in colonoscopy. Front Robot AI 2023; 10:1236706. [PMID: 38023589 PMCID: PMC10665478 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1236706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and responsible for approximately 1 million deaths annually. Early screening is essential to increase the chances of survival, and it can also reduce the cost of treatments for healthcare centres. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening and treatment, but it has several drawbacks, including difficulty in manoeuvring the device, patient discomfort, and high cost. Soft endorobots, small and compliant devices thatcan reduce the force exerted on the colonic wall, offer a potential solution to these issues. However, controlling these soft robots is challenging due to their deformable materials and the limitations of mathematical models. In this Review, we discuss model-free and model-based approaches for controlling soft robots that can potentially be applied to endorobots for colonoscopy. We highlight the importance of selecting appropriate control methods based on various parameters, such as sensor and actuator solutions. This review aims to contribute to the development of smart control strategies for soft endorobots that can enhance the effectiveness and safety of robotics in colonoscopy. These strategies can be defined based on the available information about the robot and surrounding environment, control demands, mechanical design impact and characterization data based on calibration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motahareh Asgari
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Ludovic Magerand
- Division of Computing, School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Luigi Manfredi
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chammas M, Abdul Jawad K, Pust GD, Rattan R, Namias N, Aicher BO, Bruns BR, Yeh DD. Association Between Fecal Contamination and Outcomes After Emergent General Surgery Colorectal Resection: A Post Hoc Analysis of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Multicenter Study. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2023. [PMID: 37498199 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2022.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The impact of fecal contamination on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergent colorectal resection is unclear. We hypothesized that fecal contamination is associated with worse clinical outcomes regardless of operative technique. Patients and Methods: This is a post hoc analysis for an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored multicenter study that prospectively enrolled emergency general surgery patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection. Subjects were categorized according to presence versus absence of intra-operative fecal contamination. Propensity score matching (1:1) by age, weight, Charlson comorbidity index, pre-operative vasopressor use, and method of colonic management (primary anastomosis [ANST] vs. ostomy [STM]) was performed. χ2 analysis was then performed to compare the composite outcome (surgical site infection and fascial dehiscence). Results: A total of 428 subjects were included, of whom 147 (34%) had fecal contamination. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in a total of 147 pairs. After controlling for operative technique, fecal contamination was still associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-4.2; p = 0.001). Conclusions: In patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection, fecal contamination, regardless of operative technique, is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Selection bias is possible, thus randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute a causal relation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Chammas
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Khaled Abdul Jawad
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Gerd Daniel Pust
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Rishi Rattan
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Nicholas Namias
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Brittany O Aicher
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brandon R Bruns
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - D Dante Yeh
- Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leifeld L, Germer CT, Böhm S, Dumoulin FL, Frieling T, Kreis M, Meining A, Labenz J, Lock JF, Ritz JP, Schreyer A, Kruis W. S3-Leitlinie Divertikelkrankheit/Divertikulitis – Gemeinsame Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:613-688. [PMID: 35388437 DOI: 10.1055/a-1741-5724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Leifeld
- Medizinische Klinik 3 - Gastroenterologie und Allgemeine Innere Medizin, St. Bernward Krankenhaus, Hildesheim, apl. Professur an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
| | - Christoph-Thomas Germer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Stephan Böhm
- Spital Bülach, Spitalstrasse 24, 8180 Bülach, Schweiz
| | | | - Thomas Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Neurogastroenterologie, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld
| | - Martin Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 2, Zentrum für Innere Medizin (ZIM), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Joachim Labenz
- Abteilung für Innere Medizin, Evang. Jung-Stilling-Krankenhaus, Siegen
| | - Johan Friso Lock
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Jörg-Peter Ritz
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Helios Klinikum Schwerin
| | - Andreas Schreyer
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane Klinikum Brandenburg, Brandenburg, Deutschland
| | - Wolfgang Kruis
- Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Review of Safety Outcomes from Clinical Trials of Baricitinib in Rheumatology, Dermatology and COVID-19. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4910-4960. [PMID: 36063279 PMCID: PMC9443639 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02281-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Baricitinib is an oral, selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 that transiently and reversibly inhibits many proinflammatory cytokines. This mechanism is a key mediator in a number of chronic inflammatory diseases; accordingly, baricitinib has been studied and approved for the treatment of several rheumatological and dermatological disorders, as well as COVID-19. This narrative review summarises and discusses the safety profile of baricitinib across these diseases, with special focus on adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors, using integrated safety data sets of clinical trial data, and puts findings into context with the underlying risk in the respective disease populations, using supporting literature. We show that rates of infection with baricitinib generally reflected the inherent risk of the disease populations being treated, with serious infections and herpes zoster being more frequent in rheumatic diseases than in dermatological disorders, and herpes simplex being reported particularly in atopic dermatitis. Similarly, rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancies were generally within or below the ranges reported for the respective disease populations, thereby reflecting the underlying risk; these events were therefore more frequent in patients with rheumatic diseases than in those with dermatological disorders, the latter of whom generally had low absolute risk. AESI were usually more common in patients with risk factors specific for each event. When a population similar to that of ORAL Surveillance was considered, the incidence rate of MACE with baricitinib was numerically lower than that reported with tofacitinib and similar to that of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. No safety concerns were observed in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib for up to 14 days. Identifying the patterns and likelihoods of AEs that occur during treatment in large groups of patients with different diseases can help the physician and patient better contextualise the benefit-to-risk ratio for the individual patient.
Collapse
|
9
|
Manfredi L. Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies. Front Robot AI 2021; 8:705454. [PMID: 34336938 PMCID: PMC8317132 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.705454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, after lung cancer (Sung et al., 2021). Early stage detection is key to increase the survival rate. Colonoscopy remains to be the gold standard procedure due to its dual capability to optically inspect the entire colonic mucosa and to perform interventional procedures at the same time. However, this causes pain and discomfort, whereby it requires sedation or anaesthesia of the patient. It is a difficult procedure to perform that can cause damage to the colonic wall in some cases. Development of new technologies aims to overcome the current limitations on colonoscopy by using advancements in endorobotics research. The design of these advanced medical devices is challenging because of the limited space of the lumen, the contorted shape, and the long tract of the large bowel. The force applied to the colonic wall needs to be controlled to avoid collateral effects such as injuries to the colonic mucosa and pain during the procedure. This article discusses the current challenges in the colonoscopy procedure, the available locomotion technologies for endorobots used in colonoscopy at a prototype level and the commercial products available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Manfredi
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
RAY K, SWAMINATHAN C. Two cases of atypical diverticular abscesses from sigmoid colon resulting from COVID-19 crisis-induced management delay. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2021. [DOI: 10.23736/s0394-9508.20.05150-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
11
|
Kiely MX, Yao M, Chen L. Laparoscopic Lavage in the Management of Hinchey III/IV Diverticulitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:104-112. [PMID: 33642950 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Diverticulitis manifestations may cover a spectrum of mild local inflammation to diffuse feculent peritonitis. Up to 35% of patients presenting with diverticulitis will have purulent (Hinchey grade III) or feculent (Hinchey grade IV) contamination of the abdomen, with a high-associated morbidity and mortality. Surgical management may involve segmental resection with or without restoration of bowel continuity. However, emergency resection for diverticulitis can be associated with high mortality rates, as well as low stoma reversal rates at 1 year. Therefore, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has been proposed for use in selected patients with purulent peritonitis. The topic of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis in the literature has been controversial. Our review of the recent data show that laparoscopic lavage may be safe and feasible in select patients with similar rates of mortality and major morbidity. There is, however, a concern regarding an associated higher rate of postoperative abscess and early reintervention risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria X Kiely
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mengdi Yao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lilian Chen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Azhar N, Johanssen A, Sundström T, Folkesson J, Wallon C, Kørner H, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Øresland T, Yaqub S, Buchwald P, Schultz JK. Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Long-term Outcomes From the Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:121-127. [PMID: 33355658 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, with significant morbidity. Short-term results from randomized clinical trials have indicated that laparoscopic lavage is a feasible alternative to resection. However, it appears that no long-term results are available. Objective To compare long-term (5-year) outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and primary resection as treatments of perforated purulent diverticulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants This international multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 21 hospitals in Sweden and Norway, which enrolled patients between February 2010 and June 2014. Long-term follow-up was conducted between March 2018 and November 2019. Patients with symptoms of left-sided acute perforated diverticulitis, indicating urgent surgical need and computed tomography-verified free air, were eligible. Those available for trial intervention (Hinchey stages <IV) were included in the long-term follow-up. Interventions Patients were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or colon resection based on computer-generated, center-stratified block randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was severe complications within 5 years. Secondary outcomes included mortality, secondary operations, recurrences, stomas, functional outcomes, and quality of life. Results Of 199 randomized patients, 101 were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and 98 were assigned to colon resection. At the time of surgery, perforated purulent diverticulitis was confirmed in 145 patients randomized to lavage (n = 74) and resection (n = 71). The median follow-up was 59 (interquartile range, 51-78; full range, 0-110) months, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a final analysis of 73 patients who had had laparoscopic lavage (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [13] years; 39 men [53%]) and 69 who had received a resection (mean [SD] age, 63.5 [14] years; 36 men [52%]). Severe complications occurred in 36% (n = 26) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 35% (n = 24) in the resection group (P = .92). Overall mortality was 32% (n = 23) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 25% (n = 17) in the resection group (P = .36). The stoma prevalence was 8% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic lavage group vs 33% (n = 17; P = .002) in the resection group among patients who remained alive, and secondary operations, including stoma reversal, were performed in 36% (n = 26) vs 35% (n = 24; P = .92), respectively. Recurrence of diverticulitis was higher following laparoscopic lavage (21% [n = 15] vs 4% [n = 3]; P = .004). In the laparoscopic lavage group, 30% (n = 21) underwent a sigmoid resection. There were no significant differences in the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire or Cleveland Global Quality of Life scores between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance Long-term follow-up showed no differences in severe complications. Recurrence of diverticulitis after laparoscopic lavage was more common, often leading to sigmoid resection. This must be weighed against the lower stoma prevalence in this group. Shared decision-making considering both short-term and long-term consequences is encouraged. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01047462.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najia Azhar
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anette Johanssen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Tove Sundström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Joakim Folkesson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Conny Wallon
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hartvig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ljiljana Blecic
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital, Fredrikstad, Norway
| | - Håvard Mjørud Forsmo
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Emergency Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Tom Øresland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nascimbeni R, Amato A, Cirocchi R, Serventi A, Laghi A, Bellini M, Tellan G, Zago M, Scarpignato C, Binda GA. Management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. A multidisciplinary review and position paper. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 25:153-165. [PMID: 33155148 PMCID: PMC7884367 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02346-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Perforated diverticulitis is an emergent clinical condition and its management is challenging and still debated. The aim of this position paper was to critically review the available evidence on the management of perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis in order to provide evidence-based suggestions for a management strategy. Four Italian scientific societies (SICCR, SICUT, SIRM, AIGO), selected experts who identified 5 clinically relevant topics in the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis that would benefit from a multidisciplinary review. The following 5 issues were tackled: 1) Criteria to decide between conservative and surgical treatment in case of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis; 2) Criteria or scoring system to choose the most appropriate surgical option when diffuse peritonitis is confirmed 3); The appropriate surgical procedure in hemodynamically stable or stabilized patients with diffuse peritonitis; 4) The appropriate surgical procedure for patients with generalized peritonitis and septic shock and 5) Optimal medical therapy in patients with generalized peritonitis from diverticular perforation before and after surgery. In perforated diverticulitis surgery is indicated in case of diffuse peritonitis or failure of conservative management and the decision to operate is not based on the presence of extraluminal air. If diffuse peritonitis is confirmed the choice of surgical technique is based on intraoperative findings and the presence or risk of severe septic shock. Further prognostic factors to consider are physiological derangement, age, comorbidities, and immune status. In hemodynamically stable patients, emergency laparoscopy has benefits over open surgery. Options include resection and anastomosis, Hartmann’s procedure or laparoscopic lavage. In generalized peritonitis with septic shock, an open surgical approach is preferred. Non-restorative resection and/or damage control surgery appear to be the only viable options, depending on the severity of hemodynamic instability. Multidisciplinary medical management should be applied with the main aims of controlling infection, relieving postoperative pain and preventing and/or treating postoperative ileus. In conclusion, the complexity and diversity of patients with diverticular perforation and diffuse peritonitis requires a personalized strategy, involving a thorough classification of physiological derangement, staging of intra-abdominal infection and choice of the most appropriate surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Nascimbeni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
| | - A Amato
- Unit of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, Borea Hospital, Sanremo, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - A Serventi
- Department of Surgery, Galliano Hospital, Acqui Terme, Italy
| | - A Laghi
- Department of Surgical-Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Bellini
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Tellan
- Department of Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Clinical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Zago
- Department of Robotic and Emergency Surgery, Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - C Scarpignato
- Department of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, Msida, Malta
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, ShaTin, Hong Kong
| | - G A Binda
- General Surgery, Biomedical Institute, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lambrichts DPV, van Dieren S, Bemelman WA, Lange JF. Cost-effectiveness of sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis or end colostomy for perforated diverticulitis: an analysis of the randomized Ladies trial. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1686-1694. [PMID: 32521053 PMCID: PMC7687276 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have been published favouring sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis over Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV), but cost-related outcomes were rarely reported. The present study aimed to evaluate costs and cost-effectiveness within the DIVA arm of the Ladies trial. METHODS This was a cost-effectiveness analysis of the DIVA arm of the multicentre randomized Ladies trial, comparing primary anastomosis over Hartmann's procedure for Hinchey grade III or IV diverticulitis. During 12-month follow-up, data on resource use, indirect costs (Short Form Health and Labour Questionnaire) and quality of life (EuroQol Five Dimensions) were collected prospectively, and analysed according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. Main outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) and cost-utility (ICUR) ratios, expressed as the ratio of incremental costs and the incremental probability of being stoma-free or incremental quality-adjusted life-years respectively. RESULTS Overall, 130 patients were included, of whom 64 were allocated to primary anastomosis (46 and 18 with Hinchey III and IV disease respectively) and 66 to Hartmann's procedure (46 and 20 respectively). Overall mean costs per patient were lower for primary anastomosis (€20 544, 95 per cent c.i. 19 569 to 21 519) than Hartmann's procedure (€28 670, 26 636 to 30 704), with a mean difference of €-8126 (-14 660 to -1592). The ICER was €-39 094 (95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) c.i. -1213 to -116), indicating primary anastomosis to be more cost-effective. The ICUR was €-101 435 (BCa c.i. -1 113 264 to 251 840). CONCLUSION Primary anastomosis is more cost-effective than Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. P. V. Lambrichts
- Departments of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, AMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - S. van Dieren
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, AMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - W. A. Bemelman
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, AMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - J. F. Lange
- Departments of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CentreRotterdamthe Netherlands
- IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJsselthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coakley KM, Davis BR, Kasten KR. Complicated Diverticular Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 34:96-103. [PMID: 33642949 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The modern management of colonic diverticular disease involves grouping patients into uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis, after which the correct treatment paradigm is instituted. Recent controversies suggest overlap in management strategies between these two groups. While most reports still support surgical intervention for the treatment of complicated diverticular disease, more data are forthcoming suggesting complicated diverticulitis does not merit surgical resection in all scenarios. Given the significant risk for complication in surgery for diverticulitis, careful attention should be paid to patient and procedure selection. Here, we define complicated diverticulitis, discuss options for surgical intervention, and explain strategies for avoiding operative pitfalls that result in early and late postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M Coakley
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Bradley R Davis
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Kevin R Kasten
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use May Increase the Risk of Diverticulitis but Not It's Severity among Patients with Colonic Diverticulosis: A Multicenter Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9092966. [PMID: 32937926 PMCID: PMC7565510 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colonic diverticular disease, especially diverticulitis constitutes a major cause of hospitalization and an economic burden in developed countries. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the commonest drugs used to treat several diseases affecting the upper gastrointestinal tract. A few studies have reported that the use of Proton Pump Inhibitors PPIs caused dysbiosis. In this study, we searched for a relationship between PPI use and the onset and severity of diverticulitis in patients with colonic diverticulosis. In a retrospective study, patients who were hospitalized for documented diverticulitis were enrolled as cases and compared with a control group of patients with uncomplicated diverticulosis. Overall, 613 patients who had a diagnosis of diverticulosis were included in the study, 217 of whom had diverticulitis. After multivariate analysis, the non-modifiable risk factors associated with diverticulitis included: age (p < 0.0001), hypertension (p < 0.0001), chronic renal failure (p = 0.007), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001), and left colon location (p = 0.02). However, among the modifiable factors, only PPI use (p < 0.0001) showed a significant association. Advanced disease severity (according to Hinchey classification of diverticulitis stages II–IV) was associated with aspirin use (p = 0.0004) and pan-colonic location (p = 0.02). PPI use was the only modifiable factor significantly associated with diverticulitis, but not with its severity, among patients with diverticulosis. This observation should be confirmed in future multicenter prospective studies.
Collapse
|
17
|
McKechnie T, Lee Y, Kruse C, Qiu Y, Springer JE, Doumouras AG, Hong D, Eskicioglu C. Operative management of colonic diverticular disease in the setting of immunosuppression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2020; 221:72-85. [PMID: 32814626 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppressed patients with diverticular disease are at higher risk of postoperative complications, however reported rates have varied. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were included if they compared immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease. RESULTS From 204 citations, 11 studies with 2,977 immunosuppressed patients and 780,630 immunocompetent patients were included. Mortality was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for emergent surgery (RR 1.91, 95%CI 1.24-2.95, p < 0.01), but not elective surgery (RR 1.70, 95%CI 0.14-20.47, p = 0.68). Morbidity was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for elective surgery (RR 2.18, 95%CI 1.02-4.65, p = 0.04), but not emergent surgery (RR 1.40, 95%CI 0.68-2.90, p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS Increased consideration for elective operation may preclude the need for emergent surgery and the associated increase in postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler McKechnie
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Yung Lee
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Colin Kruse
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Yuan Qiu
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jeremy E Springer
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Aristithes G Doumouras
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute diverticulitis is a common disease with public health significance. Many studies with a high level of evidence have been published recently on the surgical management of acute diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to define the accurate surgical management of acute diverticulitis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were sources used. STUDY SELECTION One reviewer conducted a systematic study with combinations of key words for the disease and the surgical procedure. Additional studies were searched in the reference lists of all included articles. The results of the systematic review were submitted to a working group composed of 13 practitioners. All of the conclusions were obtained by full consensus and validated by an external committee. INTERVENTIONS The interventions assessed were laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, primary resection with anastomosis with or without ileostomy, and the Hartmann procedure, with either a laparoscopic or an open approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Morbidity, mortality, long-term stoma rates, and quality of life were measured. RESULTS Seventy-one articles were included. Five guidelines were retrieved, along with 4 meta-analyses, 14 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials that generated 8 publications, all with a low risk of bias, except for blinding. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage showed concerning results of deep abscesses and unplanned reoperations. Studies on Hinchey III/IV diverticulitis showed similar morbidity and mortality. A reduced length of stay with Hartmann procedure compared with primary resection with anastomosis was reported in the short term, and in the long term, more definite stoma along with poorer quality of life was reported with Hartmann procedure. No high-quality data were found to support the laparoscopic approach. LIMITATIONS Trials specifically assessing Hinchey IV diverticulitis have not yet been completed. CONCLUSIONS High-quality studies showed that laparoscopic peritoneal lavage was associated with an increased morbidity and that Hartmann procedure was associated with poorer long-term outcomes than primary resection with anastomosis with ileostomy, but Hartmann procedure is still acceptable, especially in high-risk patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Amato A, Mataloni F, Bruzzone M, Carabotti M, Cirocchi R, Nascimbeni R, Gambassi G, Vettoretto NP, Pinnarelli L, Cuomo R, Annibale B, Fontana V, Binda GA. Hospital admission for complicated diverticulitis is increasing in Italy, especially in younger patients: a national database study. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:237-245. [PMID: 32016708 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02150-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidemiological studies show an increasing trend of hospitalization for acute diverticulitis (AD), but data regarding the trend in hospitalization for complicated AD in Italy are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the Italian trend in hospitalization for complicated AD, from 2008 to 2015. METHODS Using the Italian Hospital Information System, we identified all patients with complicated colonic AD as a discharge diagnosis. Age- and sex-specific rates for AD as well as type of hospital admission (emergency/elective), type of complication (peritonitis, obstruction, bleeding, abscess, fistula, perforation, sepsis) and type of treatment (medical/surgical), were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 41,622 patients with a discharge diagnosis of complicated AD were identified. Over the study period the admission rate grew from 8.8 to 11.8 per 100,000 inhabitants. The hospitalization rate was highest for patients ≥ 70 years, but the increase in the admission rate was higher among patients aged ≤ 60 years. There were more males in the group < 60 years and more females in the group ≥ 60 years old. The rate of emergency admissions associated with surgery showed a significant mean annual increase (+ 3.9% per year) in the rate of emergency admissions associated with surgery, whereas elective admissions for surgery remained stable. Peritonitis was the most frequent complication (35.5%). The rate of surgery increased in AD complicated by peritonitis (+ 5.1% per year), abscess (+ 5.8% per year) and decreased for obstruction (- 1.8% per year). CONCLUSIONS From 2008 to 2015, we documented an increasing rate of hospitalization for complicated AD, especially for younger patients, with an increase in surgery for peritonitis and abscess. Further studies are needed to clearly assess the risk factors for complications and risk of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Amato
- Department of Surgery, Borea Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy.
| | - F Mataloni
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - M Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico S. Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Carabotti
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Medical-Surgical Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hospital of Terni, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - R Nascimbeni
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Department of Molecular and Transational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G Gambassi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRRCS, Rome, Italy
| | - N P Vettoretto
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Montichiari, Ospedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - L Pinnarelli
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - R Cuomo
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - B Annibale
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Medical-Surgical Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - V Fontana
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico S. Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - G A Binda
- Italian Group of Diverticular Disease (GRIMAD), Rome, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery, Biomedical Institute, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lambrichts DPV, Edomskis PP, van der Bogt RD, Kleinrensink GJ, Bemelman WA, Lange JF. Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1371-1386. [PMID: 32504331 PMCID: PMC7340681 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal surgical approach for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV) remains debated. In recent years, accumulating evidence comparing sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis (PA) with the Hartmann's procedure (HP) was presented. Therefore, the aim was to provide an updated and extensive synthesis of the available evidence. METHODS A systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies comparing PA to HP for adult patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis were included. Data on mortality, morbidity, stoma reversal, and patient-reported and cost-related outcomes were extracted. Random effects models were used to pool data and estimate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS From a total of 1560 articles, four randomized controlled trials and ten observational studies were identified, reporting on 1066 Hinchey III/IV patients. Based on trial outcomes, PA was found to be favorable over HP in terms of stoma reversal rates (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.29, 5.31) and reversal-related morbidity (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16, 0.69). No differences in mortality (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.32, 2.19), morbidity (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65, 1.51), and reintervention rates (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.39, 2.11) after the index procedure were demonstrated. Data on patient-reported and cost-related outcomes were scarce, as well as outcomes in PA patients with or without ileostomy construction and Hinchey IV patients. CONCLUSION Although between-study heterogeneity needs to be taken into account, the present results indicate that primary anastomosis seems to be the preferred option over Hartmann's procedure in selected patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniël PV Lambrichts
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD The Netherlands ,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim P Edomskis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD The Netherlands
| | - Ruben D van der Bogt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD The Netherlands ,Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
An SB, Kim BC, Kim JY, Kim JW, Lee SJ. Results of Laparotomy and Laparoscopy for Perforated Colonic Diverticulitis. JSLS 2019; 23:JSLS.2019.00007. [PMID: 31431798 PMCID: PMC6687474 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2019.00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives The applications of laparoscopic surgery are expanding, but there is still controversy about its application in patients with peritonitis resulting from diverticulitis perforation. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the postoperative mortality rate in patients undergoing surgery for perforated diverticulitis. Further, we compared the recovery courses of patients between open and laparoscopic surgeries. Methods We analyzed the medical records of adult patients with peritonitis caused by perforated diverticulitis from six hospitals of Hallym University Medical Center from January 2006 to December 2016. Results A total of 166 patients were identified. In the univariate analysis, the statistically significant factors associated with postoperative mortality were age ≥ 60 years, body mass index ≥ 23 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, hypertension, serum blood urea nitrogen ≥ 23 mg/dL, creatinine ≥ 1.2 mg/dL, albumin < 3.0 g/dL, modified Hinchey score ≥ grade III, formation of stoma, and laparoscopic surgery. In multivariate analysis, serum albumin < 3.0 g/dL was the only factor associated with mortality. After case-control matching, we compared postoperative hospital course and prognosis between open and laparoscopic surgery groups. There was no significant difference in the clinical course between the groups. No significant difference was observed in the complication rate, reoperation rate, readmission rate, and mortality. Conclusion Low preoperative serum albumin level (<3.0 g/dL) affects the mortality rate of patients after surgery. The hospital course and prognosis after laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery are comparable in patients with peritonitis caused by diverticulitis perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Bak An
- Department Of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Chun Kim
- Department Of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Yeon Kim
- Department Of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Wan Kim
- Department Of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Jeon Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University and Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gasser E, Alexander P, Reich-Weinberger S, Buchner S, Kogler P, Zitt M, Kafka-Ritsch R, Öfner D. Damage control surgery for perforated diverticulitis: a two center experience with two different abdominal negative pressure therapy devices. Acta Chir Belg 2019; 119:370-375. [PMID: 30388397 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1534397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The adoption of abdominal negative pressure therapy (NPT) during urgent laparotomy has shown to be helpful to control abdominal sepsis, improve morbidity and increase anastomosis rate. The aim of this study was to compare feasibility and outcome of two different abdominal negative pressure devices. Methods: The retrospective two-center study includes 78 consecutive patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, who underwent urgent laparotomy using the ABThera™ (KCI, Wien, Austria) abdominal NPT device (Group A, n = 51) or the Suprasorb® CNP (Lohmann & Rauscher, Wien, Austria) abdominal NPT device (Group B, n = 27). Results: The mean length of abdominal NPT was 3.6 days in Group A and 2.8 days in Group B. Revisional surgery after closure of the abdomen was necessary due to surgical site infections, fascial dehiscence or anastomotic insufficiency in 25% and 29%, respectively. NPT-associated complications like fistula formation or acute bleeding were not observed. Mortality was 15% (Group A) and 7% (Group B). Conclusion: Despite the good feasibility and the well-known positive effect of abdominal NPT, perforated diverticulitis is still associated with high morbidity. However, the analysis did not show significant differences between the two abdominal NPT devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Gasser
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Perathoner Alexander
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Selina Buchner
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Private Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Pamela Kogler
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Matthias Zitt
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Private Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cirocchi R, Nascimbeni R, Binda GA, Vettoretto N, Cuomo R, Gambassi G, Amato A, Annibale B. Surgical treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis in the elderly. MINERVA CHIR 2019; 74:465-471. [PMID: 30306769 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07744-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Although the true prevalence is unknown, colonic diverticulosis is one of the most common disease of the digestive tract in Western countries. Based on administrative data of hospitalized patients, the incidence of diverticulitis has been increasing in last decades. In general, elderly patients undergo less frequently an elective colonic resection; but a substantial part of emergency surgeries is performed in elderly patients. In these older patients the choice of any clinical and surgical option is to be correlated not only to the severity of diverticulitis, but also to general status and the co-existing comorbidities. In this regard, it is mandatory that all patients undergo a multidimensional, comprehensive geriatric assessment to correctly identify those who are fit, vulnerable or frail. The analysis of data currently available highlights three relevant elements: type and severity of peritoneal contamination, hemodynamic conditions (stable or unstable), and concomitant comorbidities (fit or frail status). There is no single ideal surgical treatment that can be considered as gold standard for all clinical presentations; the final clinical decision-making should always be based on patient's general health status, severity of peritonitis and of sepsis. In a septic elderly patient who is hemodynamically unstable, treatment should be as prompt as possible independent of the Hinchey's stage, and could include either a Mickulicz stoma or a DCS strategy. In an elderly patient who is fit and hemodynamically stable, the surgical options are similar to those in a younger patient. If a patient is frail but hemodynamically stable, he should be treated with a Hartmann's procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Surgery and Biochemical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy -
| | - Riccardo Nascimbeni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gian A Binda
- Department of General Surgery, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- Unit of Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery, M. Mellini Hospital, Chiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rosario Cuomo
- Department of Surgery and Biochemical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gambassi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Amato
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Sanremo, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy
| | - Bruno Annibale
- Department of Medical-Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cirocchi R, Popivanov G, Corsi A, Amato A, Nascimbeni R, Cuomo R, Annibale B, Konaktchieva M, Binda GA. The Trends of Complicated Acute Colonic Diverticulitis-A Systematic Review of the National Administrative Databases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2019; 55:E744. [PMID: 31744067 PMCID: PMC6915450 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55110744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The diverticular disease includes a broad spectrum of different "clinical situations" from diverticulosis to acute diverticulitis (AD), with a full spectrum of severity ranging from self-limiting infection to abscess or fistula formation to free perforation. The present work aimed to assess the burden of complicated diverticulitis through a comparative analysis of the hospitalizations based on the national administrative databases. Materials and Methods: A review of the international and national administrative databases concerning admissions for complicated AD was performed. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. No definition of acute complicated diverticulitis was reported in any study. Complicated AD accounted for approximately 42% and 79% of the hospitalizations. The reported rates of abscess varied between 1% and 10% from all admissions for AD and 5-29% of the cases with complicated AD. An increasing temporal trend was found in one study-from 6% to 10%. The rates of diffuse peritonitis ranged from 1.6% to 10.2% of all hospitalizations and 11% and 47% of the complicated cases and were stable in the time. Conclusions: The available data precluded definitive conclusions because of the significant discrepancy between the included studies. The leading cause was the presence of heterogeneity due to coding inaccuracies in all databases, absence of ICD codes to distinguish the different type of complications, and the lack of coding data about some general conditions such as sepsis, shock, malnutrition, steroid therapy, diabetes, pulmonary, and heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hospital of Terni, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy;
| | - Georgi Popivanov
- Department of Surgery, Military Medical Academy, ul. “Sv. Georgi Sofiyski” 3, 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Alessia Corsi
- Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale della Media Valle del Tevere, via del Buda, 06059 Todi, Italy;
| | - Antonio Amato
- Unit of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, Borea Hospital, 18038 Sanremo, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Nascimbeni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Rosario Cuomo
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano Hospital, 81100 Caserta, Italy;
| | - Bruno Annibale
- Department of Medical Surgery, Sciences and Translational Medicine University Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| | - Marina Konaktchieva
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Military Medical Academy, ul. “Sv. Georgi Sofiiski“ 3, 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria;
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Piatti JM, Bun ME, Rotholtz NA. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid resection without diversion in perforated diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1336-1342. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06910-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
26
|
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:599-610. [PMID: 31178342 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30174-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested that sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis is superior to Hartmann's procedure. The likelihood of stoma reversal after primary anastomosis has been reported to be higher and reversal seems to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality. Although promising, results from these previous studies remain uncertain because of potential selection bias. Therefore, this study aimed to assess outcomes after Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis, with or without defunctioning ileostomy, for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (Hinchey III or IV disease) in a randomised trial. METHODS A multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial was done in eight academic hospitals and 34 teaching hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands. Patients aged between 18 and 85 years who presented with clinical signs of general peritonitis and suspected perforated diverticulitis were eligible for inclusion if plain abdominal radiography or CT scan showed diffuse free air or fluid. Patients with Hinchey I or II diverticulitis were not eligible for inclusion. Patients were allocated (1:1) to Hartmann's procedure or sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis, with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Patients were enrolled by the surgeon or surgical resident involved, and secure online randomisation software was used in the operating room or by the trial coordinator on the phone. Random and concealed block sizes of two, four, or six were used, and randomisation was stratified by age (<60 and ≥60 years). The primary endpoint was 12-month stoma-free survival. Patients were analysed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR2037, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01317485. FINDINGS Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 22, 2013, and June 9, 2013, and trial termination on June 3, 2016, 133 patients (93 with Hinchey III disease and 40 with Hinchey IV disease) were randomly assigned to Hartmann's procedure (68 patients) or primary anastomosis (65 patients). Two patients in the Hartmann's group were excluded, as was one in the primary anastomosis group; the modified intention-to-treat population therefore consisted of 66 patients in the Hartmann's procedure group (46 with Hinchey III disease, 20 with Hinchey IV disease) and 64 in the primary anastomosis group (46 with Hinchey III disease, 18 with Hinchey IV disease). In 17 (27%) of 64 patients assigned to primary anastomosis, no stoma was constructed. 12-month stoma-free survival was significantly better for patients undergoing primary anastomosis compared with Hartmann's procedure (94·6% [95% CI 88·7-100] vs 71·7% [95% CI 60·1-83·3], hazard ratio 2·79 [95% CI 1·86-4·18]; log-rank p<0·0001). There were no significant differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after the index procedure for Hartmann's procedure compared with primary anastomosis (morbidity: 29 [44%] of 66 patients vs 25 [39%] of 64, p=0·60; mortality: two [3%] vs four [6%], p=0·44). INTERPRETATION In haemodynamically stable, immunocompetent patients younger than 85 years, primary anastomosis is preferable to Hartmann's procedure as a treatment for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III or Hinchey IV disease). FUNDING Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Collapse
|
27
|
Thorisson A, Nikberg M, Andreasson K, Smedh K, Chabok A. Non-operative management of perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal or free air - a retrospective single center cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 53:1298-1303. [PMID: 30353758 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1520291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to describe patient characteristics and results of non-operative management for patients presenting with computed tomography (CT) verified perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal or free air. METHODS All patients treated for diverticulitis (ICD-10: K-57) during 2010-2014 were identified and medical records were reviewed. Re-evaluations of CT examinations for all patients with complicated disease according to medical records were performed. All patients diagnosed with perforated diverticulitis and extraluminal or free air on re-evaluation were included and characteristics of patients having immediate surgery and those whom non-operative management was attempted are described. RESULTS Of 141 patients with perforated diverticulitis according to medical records, 136 were confirmed on CT re-evaluation. Emergency surgical intervention within 24 h of admission was performed in 29 (21%) patients. Non-operative management with iv antibiotics was attempted for 107 patients and was successful in 101 (94%). The 30-day mortality rate was 2%. The presence of a simultaneous abscess was higher for patients with failure of non-operative management compared with those that were successfully managed non-operatively (67% compared to 17%, p = .013). Eleven out of thirty-two patients (34%) with free air were successfully managed conservatively. Patients that were operated within 24 h from admission were more commonly on immunosuppressive therapy, had more commonly free intraperitoneal air and free fluid in the peritoneal cavity. CONCLUSIONS Non-operative management is successful in the majority of patients with CT-verified perforated diverticulitis with extraluminal air, and also in one-third of those with free air in the peritoneal cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Thorisson
- a Department of Radiology , Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden.,c Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden
| | - M Nikberg
- b Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden.,c Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden
| | - K Andreasson
- b Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden.,c Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden
| | - K Smedh
- b Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden.,c Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden
| | - A Chabok
- b Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery , Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden.,c Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Moro-Valdezate D, Royo-Aznar A, Martín-Arévalo J, Pla-Martí V, García-Botello S, León-Espinoza C, Fernández-Moreno MC, Espín-Basany E, Espí-Macías A. Outcomes of Hartmann's procedure and subsequent intestinal restoration. Which patients are most likely to undergo reversal? Am J Surg 2019; 218:918-927. [PMID: 30853093 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aim of the study was to describe characteristics and outcomes of Hartmann's procedure (HP) and subsequent intestinal restoration. METHODS Retrospective study including all patients who underwent HP over a period of 16 consecutive years. We propose a classification and regression tree for a more accurate view of the relationship between the variables related to intestinal restoration and their weighting in the decision to reverse HP. RESULTS 533 patients were included. Overall morbidity rate of HP was 53.5% and mortality 21.0%. Overall morbidity of the intestinal continuity reconstruction was 47.3% and mortality 0.9%. Patients with a benign disease, aged under 69 years and with low comorbidity, had an 84.4% probability of undergoing intestinal reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS HP is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Restoration of intestinal continuity involves minor, but frequent, morbidity and a low mortality rate. Age and comorbidities can decrease, and even override, the decision to reverse HP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Moro-Valdezate
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - A Royo-Aznar
- Department of Surgery, Universtitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Martín-Arévalo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - V Pla-Martí
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - S García-Botello
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - C León-Espinoza
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - M C Fernández-Moreno
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - E Espín-Basany
- Department of Surgery, Universtitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Espí-Macías
- Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Laparoscopic Lavage Versus Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019; 267:252-258. [PMID: 28338510 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical outcomes after laparoscopic lavage (LL) or colonic resection (CR) for purulent diverticulitis. BACKGROUND Laparoscopic lavage has been suggested as an alternative treatment for traditional CR. Comparative studies to date have shown conflicting results. METHODS Electronic searches of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were performed. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for effect size of continuous variables and pooled odds ratios (POR) calculated for discrete variables. RESULTS A total of 589 patients recruited from 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 comparative studies were included; 85% as Hinchey III. LL group had younger patients with higher body mass index and lower ASA grades, but comparable Hinchey classification and previous diverticulitis rates. No significant differences were noted for mortality, 30-day reoperations and unplanned readmissions. LL had higher rates of intraabdominal abscesses (POR = 2.85; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.52-5.34; P = 0.001), peritonitis (POR = 7.80; 95% CI 2.12-28.69; P = 0.002), and increased long-term emergency reoperations (POR = 3.32; 95% CI 1.73-6.38; P < 0.001). Benefits of LL included shorter operative time, fewer cardiac complications, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stay. Overall, 90% had stomas after CR, of whom 74% underwent stoma reversal within 12-months. Approximately, 14% of LL patients required a stoma; 48% obtaining gut continuity within 12-months, whereas 36% underwent elective sigmoidectomy. CONCLUSIONS The preservation of diseased bowel by LL is associated with approximately 3 times greater risk of persistent peritonitis, intraabdominal abscesses and the need for emergency surgery compared with CR. Future studies should focus on developing composite predictive scores encompassing the wide variation in presentations of diverticulitis and treatment tailored on case-by-case basis.
Collapse
|
30
|
Shaban F, Carney K, McGarry K, Holtham S. Perforated diverticulitis: To anastomose or not to anastomose? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 58:11-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
31
|
Ahmed AM, Moahammed AT, Mattar OM, Mohamed EM, Faraag EA, AlSafadi AM, Hirayama K, Huy NT. Surgical treatment of diverticulitis and its complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surgeon 2018; 16:372-383. [PMID: 30033140 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 03/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The surgical interventions of diverticulitis vary according to its grade and severity. There is a controversy about the best of these different surgical procedures. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes and complications between different surgical approaches for acute diverticulitis and its complications. METHODS Nine electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for RCTs comparing different surgical procedures for different grades of diverticulitis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015032290). RESULTS Outcome data were analyzed from five RCTs comparing laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) (n = 247) versus open sigmoid resection (OSR) (n = 237) for treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis with minimal heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in short-term postoperative overall morbidity (risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.31; P = 0.56) and long-term postoperative major morbidity (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.31, P = 0.34). In other six RCTs compared laparoscopic lavage with resection for treatment of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis, the postoperative mortality rate was non-significant in both short-term (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.79-3.04; P = 0.21) and long-term (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29-1.58; P = 0.36) follow up. CONCLUSIONS LSR is not superior over OSR regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality for acute symptomatic diverticulitis. Furthermore, laparoscopic lavage was proved to be as safe as resection for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis. Further RCTs are still needed to make an accurate decision regarding these and other procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kenji Hirayama
- Department of Immunogenetics, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Leading Graduate School Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
| | - Nguyen Tien Huy
- Evidence Based Medicine Research Group & Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Viet Nam; Department of Clinical Product Development, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Leading Graduate School Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kohl A, Rosenberg J, Bock D, Bisgaard T, Skullman S, Thornell A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Haglind E. Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1128-1134. [PMID: 29663316 PMCID: PMC6055876 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis was treated with resection and colostomy (Hartmann's procedure), with inherent complications and risk of a permanent stoma. The DILALA (DIverticulitis – LAparoscopic LAvage versus resection (Hartmann's procedure) for acute diverticulitis with peritonitis) and other randomized trials found laparoscopic lavage to be a feasible and safe alternative. The medium‐term follow‐up results of DILALA are reported here. Methods Patients were randomized during surgery after being diagnosed with Hinchey grade III perforated diverticulitis at diagnostic laparoscopy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more secondary operations from 0 to 24 months after the index procedure in the laparoscopic lavage versus Hartmann's procedure groups. The trial was registered as ISRCTN82208287. Results Forty‐three patients were randomized to laparoscopic lavage and 40 to Hartmann's procedure. Patients in the lavage group had a 45 per cent reduced risk of undergoing one or more operations within 24 months (relative risk 0·55, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·84; P = 0·012) and had fewer operations (ratio 0·51, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·024) compared with those in the Hartmann's group. No difference was found in mean number of readmissions (1·37 versus 1·50; P = 0·221) or mortality between patients randomized to laparoscopic lavage or Hartmann's procedure. Three patients in the lavage group and nine in the Hartmann's group had a colostomy at 24 months. Conclusion Laparoscopic lavage is a better option for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis than open resection and colostomy. Laparoscopic lavage still an option
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kohl
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - T Bisgaard
- GastroUnit, Surgical Division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - S Skullman
- Department of Surgery, Skövde Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - A Thornell
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Gehrman
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Perforated diverticulitis: To anastomose or not to anastomose? A national survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
34
|
Abstract
The management of perforated diverticulitis is a challenging aspect of general surgery. The prevalence of colonic diverticular disease has increased over the last decade and will continue to increase as the baby boomers add to the elderly population. Improvements in diagnostic imaging modalities, efforts to maintain intestinal continuity, and percutaneous drainage procedures now result in several alternatives when selecting a management strategy for complicated presentations. Specifically, laparoscopic lavage and resection with primary anastomosis have emerged as options for treatment of Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis in place of diversion in the appropriately selected patient. Percutaneous drainage of Hinchey II diverticulitis in centers equipped with interventional radiology provides another minimally invasive adjunct. The objective of this paper is to provide an update on the current management of perforated diverticulitis, with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical options for the treatment of Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evon Zoog
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee
| | - W. Heath Giles
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee
| | - Robert A. Maxwell
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Banasiewicz T, Francuzik W, Bobkiewicz A, Krokowicz Ł, Borejsza-Wysocki M, Paszkowski J, Studniarek A, Krokowicz P, Grochowalski M, Szczepkowski M, Lorenc Z. The influence of rifaximin on diverticulitis rate and quality of life in patients with diverticulosis. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2017; 89:22-31. [PMID: 28522790 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.6012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Diverticulosis, its associated symptoms and complications are one of the most common pathologies of the gastrointestinal tract in more economically developed countries. Presence of diverticuli and their clinical consequences can be divided into four categories: 1) diverticulosis, i.e. an asymptomatic presence of diverticuli that are usually found by accident 2) symptomatic uncomplicated diverticulosis 3) diverticulitis (acute uncomplicated diverticulitis) 4) complications of diverticulitis (conditions requiring hospital stay). The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of rifaximin in preventing diverticulitis in patients visiting proctology clinics. The diagnostic criterium for diverticulosis was confirmation by colonoscopy, barium enema or CT colography (virtual colonoscopy) as well as history of at least one documented episode of diverticulosis. History of diverticulosis was evaluated based on medical records, clinical symptoms, elevated level of CRP (>5.0) and/or diagnostic imaging (ultrasound, CT). After setting strict exclusion criteria, 248 patients were qualified for the study out of 686, and they were later divided into two groups: control group (group I - 145 patients) and studied group (group II - 103 patients receiving rifaximin prophylaxis). Diverticulitis rate was comparable in both groups over a period of 6 months before study (p = 0.1306) and 6 months of treatment (p=0.3044). Between the 6th and 12th month of treatment, a significantly lower rate of diverticulitis was noted in the group receiving rifaximin compared to control group (p<0.0001). Patients receiving rifaximin reported higher quality of life (which was assessed using the VAS scale) compared to control group after 12 months. The results confirmed the efficacy of riaximin in prevention of diverticulitis, even in the scheme of repeated courses every 3 months. Not only did application of rifaximin lower the rate of diverticulitis and its complications in patients after an episode of diverticulitis, but also it improved the patients' quality of life. It seems that diverticulitis prophylaxis based on rifaximin can be economically efficient, however, it requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Banasiewicz
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Prezydenta Stanisława Wojciechowskiego w Kaliszu
| | - Wojciech Francuzik
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie; Charité Universitätsmedzin Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Adam Bobkiewicz
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Łukasz Krokowicz
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Jacek Paszkowski
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Adam Studniarek
- Department of General Surgery Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA
| | - Piotr Krokowicz
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Kolorektalnej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Marcin Grochowalski
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Kolorektalnej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Marek Szczepkowski
- Kliniczny Oddział Chirurgii Ogólnej i Kolorektalnej Szpitala Bielańskiego w Warszawie Wydział Rehabilitacji Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego Józefa Piłsudskiego w Warszawie
| | - Zbigniew Lorenc
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Kolorektalnej i Urazowej, Szpital Św. Barbary w Sosnowcu
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Khan RMA, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Early elective versus delayed elective surgery in acute recurrent diverticulitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 46:92-101. [PMID: 28882772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate outcomes of early versus delayed surgery in patients with acute recurrent diverticulitis. METHODS We performed a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards. We conducted a search of electronic information sources, including MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; and ISRCTN Register, and bibliographic reference lists to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating outcomes of early versus delayed surgery in patients with acute recurrent diverticulitis. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the risk of bias of included studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. RESULTS We identified three retrospective and one prospective cohort studies enrolling a total of 1046 patients. The included patients were comparable in terms of age, ASA score and Hinchey classifications (Hinchey I and II). The results of our analyses suggested that there was no difference between two groups in surgical site infection [Odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% CI 0.79-3.27, P = 0.19], intra-abdominal abscess (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.21-4.00, P = 0.91), anastomotic leak (OR1.27, 95% CI 0.50-3.25, P = 0.61), 30-day mortality [Risk difference (RD) 0.00 95% CI -0.01-0.01, P = 0.80], postoperative ileus (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.50-3.66, P = 0.55), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.32-2.69, P = 0.89), ureteric injury (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.08-5.07, P = 0.65), and overall morbidity (OR 1.42 95% CI 0.76-2.66, P = 0.27). The early surgery was associated with longer operative time [Mean Difference (MD) 12.8, 95% CI 5.08-20.53, P = 0.001] and length of stay (MD 4.41, 95% CI -0.34-8.53, P = 0.03). Among those undergoing laparoscopic surgery, conversion to open surgery was higher in the early surgery group (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.36-5.40, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS The best available evidence suggests that there is no difference between early elective and delayed elective surgery for acute recurrent diverticulitis in terms of clinical outcomes. However, longer operative time and length of stay and higher conversion rate to open surgery associated with early elective surgery may make the delayed elective surgery more cost-effective. The best available evidence is derived from non-randomised studies; therefore, high quality randomised controlled trials are required to provide more robust basis for definite conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shahin Hajibandeh
- Department of General Surgery, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Shahab Hajibandeh
- Department of General Surgery, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schultz JK, Wallon C, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Folkesson J, Buchwald P, Kørner H, Dahl FA, Øresland T, Yaqub S, Papp A, Ersson U, Zittel T, Fagerström N, Gustafsson D, Dafnis G, Cornelius M, Egenvall M, Nyström PO, Syk I, Vilhjalmsson D, Arbman G, Chabok A, Helgeland M, Bondi J, Husby A, Helander R, Kjos A, Gregussen H, Talabani AJ, Tranø G, Nygaard IH, Wiedswang G, Sjo OH, Desserud KF, Norderval S, Gran MV, Pettersen T, Sæther A. One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recent randomized trials demonstrated that laparoscopic lavage compared with resection for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis was associated with similar mortality, less stoma formation but a higher rate of early reintervention. The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes in patients who participated in the randomized Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) trial.
Methods
Between February 2010 and June 2014, patients from 21 hospitals in Norway and Sweden presenting with suspected perforated diverticulitis were enrolled in a multicentre RCT comparing laparoscopic lavage and sigmoid resection. All patients with perforated diverticulitis confirmed during surgery were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis of 1-year results.
Results
Of 199 enrolled patients, 101 were assigned randomly to laparoscopic lavage and 98 to colonic resection. Perforated diverticulitis was confirmed at the time of surgery in 89 and 83 patients respectively. Within 1 year after surgery, neither severe complications (34 versus 27 per cent; P = 0·323) nor disease-related mortality (12 versus 11 per cent) differed significantly between the lavage and surgery groups. Among the 144 patients with purulent peritonitis, the rate of severe complications (27 per cent (20 of 74) versus 21 per cent (15 of 70) respectively; P = 0·445) and disease-related mortality (8 versus 9 per cent) were similar. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with more deep surgical-site infections (32 versus 13 per cent; P = 0·006) but fewer superficial surgical-site infections (1 versus 17 per cent; P = 0·001). More patients in the lavage group underwent unplanned reoperations (27 versus 10 per cent; P = 0·010). Including stoma reversals, a similar proportion of patients required a secondary operation (28 versus 29 per cent). The stoma rate at 1 year was lower in the lavage group (14 versus 42 per cent in the resection group; P < 0·001); however, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life score did not differ between groups.
Conclusion
The advantages of laparoscopic lavage should be weighed against the risk of secondary intervention (if sepsis is unresolved). Assessment to exclude malignancy (although uncommon) is advised. Registration number: NCT01047462 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J K Schultz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Wallon
- Department of Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Blecic
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Kalnes, Fredrikstad, Norway
| | - H M Forsmo
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Emergency Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Folkesson
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - P Buchwald
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
| | - H Kørner
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - F A Dahl
- Health Services Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Øresland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Yaqub
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Papp
- Hudiksvalls Hospital, Hudiksvall
| | - U Ersson
- Hudiksvalls Hospital, Hudiksvall
| | - T Zittel
- Hudiksvalls Hospital, Hudiksvall
| | | | | | - G Dafnis
- Eskilstuna County Hospital, Eskilstuna
| | | | - M Egenvall
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm
| | | | - I Syk
- Skåne University Hospital, Malmö
| | | | - G Arbman
- Vrinnevi Hospital, Linköping University, Norköping
| | - A Chabok
- Västmanland Hospital, Västerås, Norway
| | | | - J Bondi
- Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Helseforetak
| | - A Husby
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo
| | - R Helander
- Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen
| | - A Kjos
- Innlandet Hospital, Hamar
| | | | - A J Talabani
- Levanger Hospital, North-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger
| | - G Tranø
- Levanger Hospital, North-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger
| | - I H Nygaard
- Molde Hospital, Helse Møre og Romsdal, Molde
| | | | - O H Sjo
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo
| | | | | | - M V Gran
- University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Broersen LHA, Horváth-Puhó E, Pereira AM, Erichsen R, Dekkers OM, Sørensen HT. Corticosteroid use and mortality risk in patients with perforated colonic diverticular disease: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2017; 4:e000136. [PMID: 28461904 PMCID: PMC5387955 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Corticosteroids are a potential risk factor for mortality in patients with perforated diverticular disease, due to blinding of disease severity, hampered wound healing or adrenal insufficiency. We examined mortality in corticosteroid users and non-users among patients with perforated diverticular disease. Methods A cohort study based on medical databases including all patients ≥18 years in Denmark (source population 5 289 261 inhabitants) admitted to a hospital with incident perforated diverticular disease between 2005 and 2013. 7-day, 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality risks in corticosteroid users and non-users were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and compared with Cox proportional hazard regression adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities. Results The study included 4640 patients with perforated diverticular disease. Of these, 3743 (80.7%) had not used corticosteroids in the year before admission and 725 (15.6%) had been exposed to systemic corticosteroid treatment. The remaining 172 patients had been exposed to either inhaled or intestinal acting corticosteroid therapy. Mortality risk in non-users was 4.4% after 7 days and 15.6% after 1 year. This risk was doubled for corticosteroid users who filled their last prescription during the 90 days before admission, with mortality risks ranging from 14.2% after 7 days to 47.6% after 1 year. 1-year mortality risk was even higher for corticosteroid users with a first filled prescription ≤90 days before admission: 52.5%. Conclusions Corticosteroid use was associated with clearly increased mortality risk after perforated diverticular disease. Thus, use of corticosteroids should be regarded as an important clinical prognostic factor for mortality in patients with this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L H A Broersen
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Horváth-Puhó
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A M Pereira
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - O M Dekkers
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H T Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vennix S, van Dieren S, Opmeer BC, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoid resection for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies trial. Br J Surg 2017; 104:62-68. [PMID: 28000941 PMCID: PMC6681137 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Revised: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is an alternative to sigmoid resection in selected patients presenting with purulent peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis. Although recent trials have lacked superiority for lavage in terms of morbidity, mortality was not compromised, and beneficial secondary outcomes were shown. These included shorter duration of surgery, less stoma formation and less surgical reintervention (including stoma reversal) for laparoscopic lavage versus sigmoid resection respectively. The cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies RCT was assessed in the present study. Methods This study involved an economic evaluation of the randomized LOLA (LaparOscopic LAvage) arm of the Ladies trial (comparing laparoscopic lavage with sigmoid resection in patients with purulent peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis). The actual resource use per individual patient was documented prospectively and analysed (according to intention‐to‐treat) for up to 1 year after randomization. Results Eighty‐eight patients were randomized to either laparoscopic lavage (46) or sigmoid resection (42). The total medical costs for lavage were lower (mean difference € − 3512, 95 per cent bias‐corrected and accelerated c.i. −16 020 to 8149). Surgical reintervention increased costs in the lavage group, whereas stoma reversal increased costs in the sigmoid resection group. Differences in favour of laparoscopy were robust when costs were varied by ±20 per cent in a sensitivity analysis (mean cost difference € − 2509 to −4438). Conclusion Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis is more cost‐effective than sigmoid resection. Further evidence of lavage superiority
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vennix
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B C Opmeer
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dirweesh A, Amodu A, Khan M, Zijoo R, Ambreen B, Ibrahim M, Ijaz M, Nawwar A, Genena K, Tahir M, Kumar N, Debari VA, Wallach S. Symptomatic Diverticular Disease in Patients With Severely Reduced Kidney Function: Higher Rates of Complications and Transfusion Requirement. Gastroenterology Res 2017; 10:15-20. [PMID: 28270872 PMCID: PMC5330688 DOI: 10.14740/gr784w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of diverticulosis is increasing with 5-10% of patients developing diverticulitis and 5-15% developing symptomatic bleeding. Diverticulitis can result in abscess, perforation, fistula, or obstruction. Bleeding has combined morbidity and mortality rates of 10-20%. The purpose of this study was to compare diverticulitis-related complications and transfusion requirements for diverticular bleeding in patients with normal to moderately reduced kidney function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and patients with severe renal impairment (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and identify factors associated with these outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of all patients with diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding treated at our hospital from January 1, 2011 to July 31, 2016. Patients were evaluated for baseline characteristics, GFR, baseline hemoglobin, medications, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), presence of perforations or abscesses and the need for transfusion. Results Of the 291 patients included, males were 167 (58%). Perforations and abscesses complicating diverticulitis developed in 31/136 (23%) of patients with GFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and in 13/26 (50%) of patients with GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (odds ratio (OR): 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.423 - 8.06; P = 0.0073). Mean LOS (days) was 6.3 ± 4 in the GFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 group and 8.5 ± 4.4 in GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 group (P = 0.0001). Blood transfusion for diverticular bleeding occurred in 11/78 (14%) of patients with GFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and in 22/51 (43%) of patients with GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.99 - 10.76; P = 0.0004). Among patients who needed transfusion, mean LOS was 8.5 ± 2.5 in GFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 group and 9 ± 5 in those with GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.04). There were no differences in age, gender or race between the study groups. Conclusion There was a significant increase in complicated diverticulitis cases, transfusion requirements for diverticular bleeding and LOS in patients with severely reduced kidney function compared to patients with normal-moderately reduced renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Dirweesh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Afolarin Amodu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Muhammad Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Ritika Zijoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Bushra Ambreen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Mohammad Ibrahim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Muhammad Ijaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Abdelhameed Nawwar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Kareem Genena
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Muhammad Tahir
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Naresh Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Vincent A Debari
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, USA
| | - Sara Wallach
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
[Prognostic value of the presence of pericolic air bubbles detected by computed tomography in acute diverticulitis]. CIR CIR 2016; 85:471-477. [PMID: 27955857 DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2016.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverticular disease is common in industrialized countries. Computed tomography has been used as the preferred diagnostic method; although different scales haves been described to classify the disease, none of them encompass total disease aspects and behaviour. OBJETIVE To analyze the patients with acute diverticulitis confirmed by computed tomography at the ABC Medical Center Campus Observatorio from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012, in whom pericolic free air in the form of bubbles was identified by computed tomography and if this finding can be considered as a prognostic factor for the disease. METHODS A series of 124 patients was analyzed who had acute diverticulitis confirmed by computed tomography, in order to identify the presence of pericolic bubbles. RESULTS Of the 124 patients, 29 presented with pericolic bubbles detected by computed tomography; of these, 62.1% had localized peritoneal signs at the time of the initial assessment, (P<.001); leukocytosis (13.33 vs 11.16, P<.001) and band count (0.97 vs 0.48, P<.001) was higher in this group. Patients with pericolonic bubbles had a longer hospital stay (5.5days vs 4.3days, P<.001) and started and tolerated liquids later (4.24days vs. 3.02days, P<.001) than the group of patients without this finding. CONCLUSIONS The presence of pericolic bubbles in patients with acute diverticulitis can be related to a more aggressive course of the disease.
Collapse
|
42
|
Acute colonic diverticulitis: an update on clinical classification and management with MDCT correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1842-50. [PMID: 27138434 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0764-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Currently, the most commonly used classification of acute colonic diverticulitis (ACD) is the modified Hinchey classification, which corresponds to a slightly more complex classification by comparison with the original description. This modified classification allows to categorize patients with ACD into four major categories (I, II, III, IV) and two additional subcategories (Ia and Ib), depending on the severity of the disease. Several studies have clearly demonstrated the impact of this classification for determining the best therapeutic approach and predicting perioperative complications for patients who need surgery. This review provides an update on the classification of ACD along with a special emphasis on the corresponding MDCT features of the different categories and subcategories. This modified Hinchey classification should be known by emergency physicians, radiologists, and surgeons in order to improve patient care and management because each category has a specific therapeutic approach.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverticulitis is a common and morbid disease with incompletely understood risk factors and pathophysiology. Geographic and, recently, seasonal trends in diverticulitis have been described in the United States. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare seasonal trends in urgent hospital admission for diverticulitis in geographically distinct populations in the northern and southern hemispheres. DESIGN Inpatient, urgent admissions for diverticulitis were identified within the Dr Foster Intelligence Global Comparators Dataset, a global benchmarking collaborative. SETTINGS Admissions to participating hospitals in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States were identified between 2008 and 2013. PATIENTS A total of 18,672 urgent admissions for diverticulitis were identified among 5.5-million admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Four separate hypothesis testing methods were used to identify seasonal trends in diverticulitis admissions among international patient populations. RESULTS Seasonal trends were present in all 3 countries. A summer peak was observed in both hemispheres using multiple statistical testing methods. Logistic regression analyses identified summer months as significantly associated with diverticulitis admission in all 3 countries. LIMITATIONS This study is limited by restriction to inpatient admissions, reliance on administrative data, and participation of select hospitals within the database. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest a shared seasonal risk factor among geographically distinct populations for diverticulitis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Weisenstein DB, Popescu IA. ["Barking" micturition noise as sign of acute hip-TEP-late infection]. DER ORTHOPADE 2016; 45:789-91. [PMID: 27456529 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3300-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This article presents the case of a patient with an acute late infection of the hip prosthesis. At first, complaints in the hip region were in the foreground. Shortly after the revision operation the patient noticed a barking noise during micturition, as sign of a pneumaturia. The following diagnostics showed a perforated sigmoid diverticulitis with a sigmoid-urinary bladder-fistula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B Weisenstein
- Klinik für Orthopädie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Nordallee 1, 54292, Trier, Deutschland.
| | - I-A Popescu
- Klinik für Orthopädie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Nordallee 1, 54292, Trier, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Laparoscopic Lavage Is Feasible and Safe for the Treatment of Perforated Diverticulitis With Purulent Peritonitis: The First Results From the Randomized Controlled Trial DILALA. Ann Surg 2016; 263:117-22. [PMID: 25489672 PMCID: PMC4679345 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate short-term outcomes of a new treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis in a randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND Perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III) has traditionally been treated with surgery including colon resection and stoma (Hartmann procedure) with considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic lavage has been suggested as a less invasive surgical treatment. METHODS Laparoscopic lavage was compared with colon resection and stoma in a randomized controlled multicenter trial, DILALA (ISRCTN82208287). Initial diagnostic laparoscopy showing Hinchey III was followed by randomization. Clinical data was collected up to 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were randomized, out of whom 39 patients in laparoscopic lavage and 36 patients in the Hartmann procedure groups were available for analysis. Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic lavage did not differ when compared with the Hartmann procedure. Laparoscopic lavage resulted in shorter operating time, shorter time in the recovery unit, and shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS In this trial, laparoscopic lavage as treatment for patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III was feasible and safe in the short-term.
Collapse
|
46
|
A national evaluation of the management practices of acute diverticulitis. Surgeon 2016; 15:206-210. [PMID: 26791395 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2015.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diverticulitis is a common surgical admission that presents with a wide range of symptoms and severity. Overall there has been a shift to conservative management practices, including the consideration of non-antibiotic treatment approaches in select cases. METHODS A national survey of all consultant surgeons evaluating their practices was performed. Reasons for changes in management, use of radiological imaging, role of non-antibiotic treatment approaches and indications for elective surgical management were evaluated. RESULTS Response rate for this survey was 67.7% (n = 67/99). An overwhelming 92.5% stated that computed tomography imaging was routinely used to investigate acute presentations. Interestingly, 22.4% stated they would consider a non-antibiotic treatment approach in uncomplicated diverticulitis. Main reasons for adopting this approach was low inflammatory markers with short duration of symptoms. Co-amoxiclav was the most common antibiotic used for acute diverticulitis, with considerable variability in duration of treatment. Additionally, there was considerable heterogeneity regarding how many recurrences were necessary before surgical management was required. CONCLUSION This review highlights substantial variation in the management of diverticulitis across Ireland. Shifts to non-antibiotic treatment approaches for uncomplicated cases are observed, but less so than in Northern Europe. National guidelines are required to establish uniform treatment protocols including indications for surgical resection.
Collapse
|
47
|
Vennix S, Lips DJ, Di Saverio S, van Wagensveld BA, Brokelman WJ, Gerhards MF, van Geloven AA, van Dieren S, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Acute laparoscopic and open sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis: a propensity score-matched cohort. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:3889-96. [PMID: 26679173 PMCID: PMC4992031 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4694-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Background
Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis can be characterised by high morbidity and mortality rates. While the scientific community focuses on laparoscopic lavage as an alternative for laparotomy, the option of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy seems overlooked. We compared morbidity and hospital stay following acute laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) and open sigmoidectomy (OS) for perforated diverticulitis. Methods This retrospective cohort parallel to the Ladies trial included patients from 28 Dutch academic or teaching hospitals between July 2010 and July 2014. Patients with LS were matched 1:2 to OS using the propensity score for age, gender, previous laparotomy, CRP level, gastrointestinal surgeon, and Hinchey classification. Results The propensity-matched cohort consisted of 39 patients with LS and 78 patients with OS, selected from a sample of 307 consecutive patients with purulent or faecal perforated diverticulitis. In both groups, 66 % of the patients had Hartmann’s procedure and 34 % had primary anastomosis. The hospital stay was shorter following LS (LS 7 vs OS 9 days; P = 0.016), and the postoperative morbidity rate was lower following LS (LS 44 % vs OS 66 %; P = 0.016). Mortality was low in both groups (LS 3 % vs OS 4 %; P = 0.685). The stoma reversal rate after Hartmann’s procedure was higher following laparoscopy, with a probability of being stoma-free at 12 months of 88 and 62 % in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively (P = 0.019). After primary anastomosis, the probability of reversal was 100 % in both groups. Conclusions In this propensity score-matched cohort, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is superior to open sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with regard to postoperative morbidity and hospital stay. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4694-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Vennix
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Daniel J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Walter J Brokelman
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Susan van Dieren
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Diverticular disease is a common condition in Western countries and the incidence and prevalence of the disease is increasing. The pathogenetic factors involved include structural changes in the gut that increase with age, a diet low in fibre and rich in meat, changes in intestinal motility, the concept of enteric neuropathy and an underlying genetic background. Current treatment strategies are hampered by insufficient options to stratify patients according to individual risk. One of the main reasons is the lack of an all-encompassing classification system of diverticular disease. In response, the German Society for Gastroenterology and Digestive Diseases (DGVS) has proposed a classification system as part of its new guideline for the diagnosis and management of diverticular disease. The classification system includes five main types of disease: asymptomatic diverticulosis, acute uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis, as well as chronic diverticular disease and diverticular bleeding. Here, we review prevention and treatment strategies stratified by these five main types of disease, from prevention of the first attack of diverticulitis to the management of chronic complications and diverticular bleeding.
Collapse
|
49
|
Reyes-Espejel L, Ruiz-Campos M, Correa-Rovelo J, García-Osogobio S. Sigmoidectomía con anastomosis primaria para diverticulitis complicada. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2015; 80:255-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2015.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2015] [Revised: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
50
|
Reyes-Espejel L, Ruiz-Campos M, Correa-Rovelo J, García-Osogobio S. Sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for complicated diverticulitis. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|