1
|
Kaufmann R, Jairam AP, Mulder IM, Wu Z, Verhelst J, Vennix S, Giesen LJX, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1884-1893. [PMID: 28901533 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of synthetic mesh to repair a potentially contaminated incisional hernia may lead to higher failure rates. A biological mesh might be considered, but little is known about long-term results. Both biological and synthetic meshes were investigated in an experimental model of peritonitis to assess their characteristics in vivo. METHODS Male Wistar rats were randomized into five groups and peritonitis was induced. A mesh was implanted after 24 h. Five meshes were investigated: Permacol™ (cross-linked collagen), Strattice™ (non-cross-linked collagen), XCM Biologic® (non-cross-linked collagen), Omyra® Mesh (condensed polytetrafluoroethylene) and Parietene™ (polypropylene). The rats were killed after either 30, 90 or 180 days. Incorporation and shrinkage of the mesh, adhesion coverage, strength of adhesions and histology were analysed. RESULTS Of 135 rats randomized, 18 died from peritonitis. Some 180 days after implantation, both XCM Biologic® and Permacol™ had significantly better incorporation than Strattice™ (P = 0·003 and P = 0·009 respectively). Strattice™ had significantly fewer adhesions than XCM Biologic® (P = 0·001) and Permacol™ (P = 0·020). Thirty days after implantation, Permacol™ had significantly stronger adhesions than Strattice™ (P < 0·001). Shrinkage was most prominent in XCM Biologic® , but no significant difference was found compared with the other meshes. Histological analysis revealed marked differences in foreign body response among all meshes. CONCLUSION This experimental study suggested that XCM Biologic® was superior in terms of incorporation, macroscopic mesh infection, and histological parameters such as collagen deposition and neovascularization. There must be sufficient overlap of mesh during placement, as XCM Biologic® showed a high rate of shrinkage. Surgical relevance The use of synthetic mesh to repair a potentially contaminated incisional hernia is not supported unequivocally, and may lead to a higher failure rate. A biological mesh might be considered as an alternative. There are few long-term studies, as these meshes are expensive and rarely used. This study evaluated the use of biological mesh in a contaminated environment, and investigated whether there is an ideal mesh. A new non-cross-linked biological mesh (XCM Biologic® ) was evaluated in this experiment. The new non-cross-linked biological mesh XCM Biologic® performed best and may be useful in patients with a potentially contaminated incisional hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kaufmann
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A P Jairam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I M Mulder
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Z Wu
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - J Verhelst
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vennix
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L J X Giesen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boersema GSA, Wu Z, Kroese LF, Vennix S, Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM, van Neck JW, Lam KH, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves colorectal anastomotic healing. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31:1031-1038. [PMID: 27041554 PMCID: PMC4834105 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2573-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) has been found to improve the healing of poorly oxygenated tissues. This study aimed to investigate the influence of HBOT on the healing in ischemic colorectal anastomosis. METHODS Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into a treatment group that received HBOT for 10 consecutive days (7 days before and 3 days after surgery), or in a control group, which did not receive the therapy. Colectomy with an ischemic anastomosis was performed in all rats. In each group, the rats were followed for 3 or 7 days after surgery to determine the influence of HBOT on anastomotic healing. RESULTS Five rats from each group died during follow-up. No anastomotic dehiscence was seen in the HBOT group, compared to 37.5 % and 28.6 % dehiscence in the control group on postoperative day (POD) 3 and 7, respectively. The HBOT group had a significantly higher bursting pressure (130.9 ± 17.0 mmHg) than the control group (88.4 ± 46.7 mmHg; p = 0.03) on POD 3. On POD 3 and POD 7, the adhesion severity was significantly higher in the control groups than in the HBOT groups (p < 0.005). Kidney function (creatinine level) of the HBOT group was significantly better than of the control group on POD 7 (p = 0.001). Interestingly, a significantly higher number of CD206+ cells (marker for type 2 macrophages) was observed in the HBOT group at the anastomotic area on POD 3. CONCLUSION Hyperbaric oxygen enhanced the healing of ischemic anastomoses in rats and improved the postoperative kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G S A Boersema
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Room Ee-173 Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Z Wu
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Room Ee-173 Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - L F Kroese
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Room Ee-173 Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vennix
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Room Ee-173 Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J W van Neck
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K H Lam
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G J Kleinrensink
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Room Ee-173 Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Woeste G, Juratli MA, Habbe N, Hannes S, El Youzouri H, Bechstein WO, Trombetta F, Moscato R, Ciamporcero T, Ghiglione F, Morino M, Tahir S, Baldjiev T, Goshev G, Pachoov N, Eftimov E, Kovachevski S, Smirnoff A, Roth JS, Wennergren J, Plymale MA, Zachem A, Davenport DL, Mangiante G, Passeri V, deManzoni G, Kaufmann R, Jairam AP, Mulder IM, Wu Z, Verhelst J, Vennix S, Giessen LJX, Jeekel J, Lange JF, Di Cerbo F, Ikhlawi K, Baladov M, Agha A, Iesalnieks I, Franklin M, Hernandez M, Glass J, Glover M, Gruber-Blum S, Fortelny R, May C, Glaser K, Redl H, Petter-Puchner A, Grossi J, Cavazzola LT, Tezza SLT, Nery LA, Zortea J, Roll S, Gorganchian F, Santa Maria V, Zuvela M, Galun D, Petrovic J, Micev M, Palibrk I, Bidzic N, Colozzi S, Clementi M, Cianca G, Giuliani A, Carlei F, Schietroma M, Amicucci G, Chung M, Cerasani N, Meyer J, Bulian DR, Heiss MM, Kocaay AF, Eker T, Celik SU, Akyol C, Cakmak A. Topic: Abdominal Wall Hernia - Abdominal wall closure. Hernia 2015; 19 Suppl 1:S198-205. [PMID: 26518800 DOI: 10.1007/bf03355349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G Woeste
- Department of Surgery, Goethe university, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M A Juratli
- Department of Surgery, Goethe university, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - N Habbe
- Department of Surgery, Goethe university, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Hannes
- Department of Surgery, Goethe university, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - H El Youzouri
- Department of Surgery, Goethe university, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - W O Bechstein
- Department of Surgery, Goethe university, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F Trombetta
- SCDU General Surgery 1, University of Turin, Company City Hospital and Healht Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - R Moscato
- SCDU General Surgery 1, University of Turin, Company City Hospital and Healht Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - T Ciamporcero
- SCDU General Surgery 1, University of Turin, Company City Hospital and Healht Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - F Ghiglione
- SCDU General Surgery 1, University of Turin, Company City Hospital and Healht Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - M Morino
- SCDU General Surgery 1, University of Turin, Company City Hospital and Healht Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - S Tahir
- University Surgical Clinic St. Naum Ohridski, Skopje, R. of Macedonia, European Union
| | - T Baldjiev
- General Hospital, Strumica, Public Health Organization, Strumica, R. of Macedonia, European Union
| | - G Goshev
- General Hospital, Strumica, Public Health Organization, Strumica, R. of Macedonia, European Union
| | - N Pachoov
- General Hospital, Strumica, Public Health Organization, Strumica, R. of Macedonia, European Union
| | - E Eftimov
- General Hospital, Strumica, Public Health Organization, Strumica, R. of Macedonia, European Union
| | - S Kovachevski
- General Hospital, Strumica, Public Health Organization, Strumica, R. of Macedonia, European Union
| | | | - J S Roth
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - J Wennergren
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - M A Plymale
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - A Zachem
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - D L Davenport
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - G Mangiante
- Upper Digestive Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - R Kaufmann
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - A P Jairam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - I M Mulder
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Z Wu
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J Verhelst
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S Vennix
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - L J X Giessen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - K Ikhlawi
- Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - M Baladov
- Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - A Agha
- Klinikum Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | | | - M Franklin
- Texas endosurgery Institute, San Antonio, USA
| | - M Hernandez
- Texas endosurgery Institute, San Antonio, USA
| | - J Glass
- Texas endosurgery Institute, San Antonio, USA
| | - M Glover
- Texas endosurgery Institute, San Antonio, USA
| | - S Gruber-Blum
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Fortelny
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - C May
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Glaser
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Redl
- Cluster of Tissue engeneering, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Traumatology, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Petter-Puchner
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Grossi
- Brazilian lutern hospital, Canoas, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - F Gorganchian
- Departamento de Cirugia, Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas A. Lanari, Caba, Argentina
| | - V Santa Maria
- Departamento de Cirugia, Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas A. Lanari, Caba, Argentina
| | - M Zuvela
- Clinical center of Serbia, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
- Medical School, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - D Galun
- Clinical center of Serbia, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
- Medical School, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - J Petrovic
- Clinical center of Serbia, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Micev
- Clinical center of Serbia, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
- Medical School, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - I Palibrk
- Clinical center of Serbia, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
- Medical School, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - N Bidzic
- Clinical center of Serbia, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - S Colozzi
- Ospedale Civile San Salvatore, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Chung
- Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea
| | - N Cerasani
- Department of Abdominal-, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - J Meyer
- Department of Abdominal-, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - D R Bulian
- Department of Abdominal-, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - M M Heiss
- Department of Abdominal-, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - A F Kocaay
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T Eker
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S U Celik
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - C Akyol
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - A Cakmak
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|