1
|
Grobbee EJ, Wisse PHA, Schreuders EH, van Roon A, van Dam L, Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bramer W, Berhane S, Deeks JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MC, Kuipers EJ. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD009276. [PMID: 35665911 PMCID: PMC9169237 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009276.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, many countries have adopted colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes, often based on faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). CRC screening aims to detect advanced neoplasia (AN), which is defined as CRC or advanced adenomas. FOBTs fall into two categories based on detection technique and the detected blood component: qualitative guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs) and faecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which can be qualitative and quantitative. Screening with gFOBTs reduces CRC-related mortality. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic test accuracy of gFOBT and FIT screening for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Google Scholar. We searched the reference lists and PubMed-related articles of included studies to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included prospective and retrospective studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for gFOBTs, FITs, or both, with colonoscopy as reference standard. We excluded case-control studies. We included studies in which all participants underwent both index test and reference standard ("reference standard: all"), and studies in which only participants with a positive index test underwent the reference standard while participants with a negative test were followed for at least one year for development of interval carcinomas ("reference standard: positive"). The target population consisted of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals undergoing CRC screening. The target conditions were CRC and advanced neoplasia (advanced adenomas and CRC combined). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. In case of disagreement, a third review author made the final decision. We used the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model to explore differences between tests and identify potential sources of heterogeneity, and the bivariate hierarchical model to estimate sensitivity and specificity at common thresholds: 10 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces and 20 µg Hb/g faeces. We performed indirect comparisons of the accuracy of the two tests and direct comparisons when both index tests were evaluated in the same population. MAIN RESULTS We ran the initial search on 25 June 2019, which yielded 63 studies for inclusion. We ran a top-up search on 14 September 2021, which yielded one potentially eligible study, currently awaiting classification. We included a total of 33 "reference standard: all" published articles involving 104,640 participants. Six studies evaluated only gFOBTs, 23 studies evaluated only FITs, and four studies included both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 2.4 μg and 50 µg Hb/g faeces. For each Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability than gFOBTs for AN (P < 0.001) and CRC (P = 0.004). For the detection of AN, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs was 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 20%), which was significantly lower than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs with summary sensitivities of 33% (95% CI 27% to 40%; P < 0.001) and 26% (95% CI 21% to 31%, P = 0.002), respectively. Results were simulated in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 screening participants with 1% CRC prevalence and 10% AN prevalence. Out of 1000 participants with AN, gFOBTs missed 850, while FITs missed 670 (10 μg Hb/g cut-off) and 740 (20 μg Hb/g cut-off). No significant differences in summary specificity for AN detection were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 92% to 96%), and FITs at 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%) and at 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (97%; 95% CI 95% to 98%). So, among 9000 participants without AN, 540 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 630 (10 μg Hb/g) and 270 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. Similarly, for the detection of CRC, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs, 39% (95% CI 25% to 55%), was significantly lower than FITs at 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 76% (95% CI 57% to 88%: P = 0.001) and 65% (95% CI 46% to 80%; P = 0.035), respectively. So, out of 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 61, and FITs missed 24 (10 μg Hb/g) and 35 (20 μg Hb/g). No significant differences in summary specificity for CRC were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 91% to 96%), and FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (94%; 95% CI 87% to 97%) and 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (96%; 95% CI 91% to 98%). So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 594 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs versus 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 396 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. In five studies that compared FITs and gFOBTs in the same population, FITs showed a higher discriminative ability for AN than gFOBTs (P = 0.003). We included a total of 30 "reference standard: positive" studies involving 3,664,934 participants. Of these, eight were gFOBT-only studies, 18 were FIT-only studies, and four studies combined both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 5 µg to 250 µg Hb/g faeces. For each QUADAS-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability for detecting CRC than gFOBTs (P < 0.001). The summary sensitivity for CRC of gFOBTs, 59% (95% CI 55% to 64%), was significantly lower than FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 80% to 95%; P < 0.001) and the 20 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 85% to 92%; P < 0.001). So, in the hypothetical cohort with 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 41, while FITs missed 11 (10 μg Hb/g) and 11 (20 μg Hb/g). The summary specificity of gFOBTs was 98% (95% CI 98% to 99%), which was higher than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 94% (95% CI 92% to 95%; P < 0.001) and 95% (95% CI 94% to 96%; P < 0.001), respectively. So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 198 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 495 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. At a specificity of 90% and 95%, FITs had a higher sensitivity than gFOBTs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS FITs are superior to gFOBTs in detecting AN and CRC in average-risk individuals. Specificity of both tests was similar in "reference standard: all" studies, whereas specificity was significantly higher for gFOBTs than FITs in "reference standard: positive" studies. However, at pre-specified specificities, the sensitivity of FITs was significantly higher than gFOBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter HA Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline H Schreuders
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aafke van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leonie van Dam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wichor Bramer
- Medical Library , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Berhane
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan J Deeks
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon Cw Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Forse CL, Petkiewicz S, Teo I, Purgina B, Klaric KA, Ramsay T, Wasserman JK. Negative Impact of COVID-19 Associated Health System Shutdown on Patients Diagnosed With Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study From a Large Tertiary Center in Ontario, Canada. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2022; 5:137-142. [PMID: 35664369 PMCID: PMC8754725 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In March 2020, a directive to halt all elective and non-urgent procedures was issued in Ontario, Canada because of COVID-19. The directive caused a temporary slowdown of screening programs including surveillance colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our goal was to determine if there was a difference in patient and tumour characteristics between CRC patients treated surgically prior to the COVID-19 directive compared to CRC patients treated after the slowdown. Methods CRC resections collected within the Champlain catchment area of eastern Ontario in the 6 months prior to COVID-19 (August 1, 2019-January 31, 2020) were compared to CRC resections collected in the 6 months post-COVID-19 slowdown (August 1, 2020-January 31, 2021). Clinical (e.g., gender, patient age, tumour site, and clinical presentation) and pathological (tumour size, tumour stage, nodal stage, and lymphovascular invasion) features were evaluated using chi-square tests, T-tests, and Mann-Whitney tests where appropriate. Results Three hundred and thirty-eight CRC specimens were identified (173 pre-COVID-19, 165 post-COVID-19 slowdown). CRC patients treated surgically post-COVID-19 slowdown had larger tumours (44 mm vs. 35 mm; P = 0.0048) and were more likely to have presented emergently (24% vs. 10%; P < 0.001). Although there was a trend towards higher tumour stage, nodal stage, and clinical stage, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Other demographic and pathologic variables including patient gender, age, and tumour site were similar between the two cohorts. Interpretation The COVID-19 slowdown resulted in a shift in the severity of disease experienced by CRC patients in Ontario. Pandemic planning in the future should consider the long-term consequences to cancer diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine L Forse
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Petkiewicz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iris Teo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bibianna Purgina
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina-Ana Klaric
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tim Ramsay
- Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason K Wasserman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ebbehøj AL, Jørgensen LN, Krarup PM, Smith HG. Histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastases in T1 colorectal cancer: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:769-776. [PMID: 34244752 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National screening programmes increase the proportion of T1 colorectal cancers. Local excision may be possible, but the risk of lymph node metastases (LNMs) could jeopardize long-term outcomes. The aim of the present study was to review the association between histopathological findings and LNMs in T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed,Embase, and Cochrane online databases. Studies investigating the association between one or more histopathological factors and LNMs in patients who underwent resection for T1 colorectal cancer were included. RESULTS Sixteen observational studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 10 181 patients, of whom 1 307 had LNMs. Lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio (OR) 7.42; P < 0.001), tumour budding (OR 4.00; P < 0.001), depth of submucosal invasion, whether measured as at least 1000 µm (OR 3.53; P < 0.001) or Sm2-3 (OR 2.12; P = 0.020), high tumour grade (OR 3.75; P < 0.001), polypoid growth pattern (OR 1.59; P = 0.040), and rectal location of tumour (OR 1.36; P = 0.003) were associated with LNMs. CONCLUSION Distinct histopathological factors associated with nodal metastases in T1 colorectal cancer can aid selection of patients for local excision or major excisional surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Ebbehøj
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L N Jørgensen
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P-M Krarup
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - H G Smith
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kang CB, Li XB, Hou S, Zhang J, Chi XQ, Shan HF, Zhang QJ, Liu TJ. The Application of Core Needle Biopsy Through the Trocar Hole in the Surgical Operation of Endoscopically Unresectable Giant Colon Polyps: A Systematic Review Study. Adv Ther 2021; 38:2662-2672. [PMID: 33864202 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01635-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The study aimed to investigate the application of core needle biopsy through the trocar hole during surgery on endoscopically unresectable giant colon polyps. METHODS The clinical data of 51 patients with endoscopically unresectable giant colon polyps from May 2016 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary observational outcomes were two comparative analyses of pathologic results, using the kappa index: comparison of the pathologic results from the preoperative colonoscopy and the postoperative pathologic results and comparison of the intraoperative pathologic results from core needle biopsy of the intestinal wall and the postoperative pathologic results. The secondary observational outcomes were duration of needle biopsy, operation duration, volume of intraoperative hemorrhage, rate of postoperative wound infection, rate of abdominal cavity infection, length of stay, and number and positivity of lymph node dissections after laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer. RESULTS Poor consistency was found between the preoperative (colonoscopy) and postoperative pathologic results, with kappa = 0.222 (i.e., kappa < 0.4), P < 0.05. However, good consistency was found between the intraoperative (core needle biopsy) and postoperative pathologic results, with kappa = 0.923 (i.e., kappa ≥ 0.75), P < 0.05. The postoperative pathologic results were as follows: 7 cases of adenomatous polyps of the colon, 12 cases of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 12 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and 25 cases of invasive colon cancer. There was no incision infection, no abdominal cavity infection or formation of an abdominal abscess, no anastomotic leakage, and no death for any of the 51 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in two cases (3.92%). CONCLUSION Biopsy through the trocar hole during laparoscopic surgery produced highly accurate pathologic results and was a fast, safe, and effective diagnostic method. Pathologic results from intraoperative biopsy could accurately determine the nature of colon polyps and provide a basis for choosing an appropriate surgical scheme.
Collapse
|
5
|
Viscido A, Ciccone F, Vernia F, Gabrieli D, Capannolo A, Stefanelli G, Necozione S, Valerii G, Ashktorab H, Latella G. Association of Colonic Diverticula with Colorectal Adenomas and Cancer. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:medicina57020108. [PMID: 33504050 PMCID: PMC7910864 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57020108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Conflicting evidence is reported regarding any association between colonic diverticula with colorectal adenomas or cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate, in a cohort of Caucasian patients, the association between colonic diverticula and colorectal polyps and cancer. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy at our institution were included in the study. The presence and location of diverticula, polyps, and cancers were recorded. Histologically, polyps were classified as adenoma (with low or high dysplasia), hyperplastic, or inflammatory. The relative risk of the association of polyps and cancer with diverticula was assessed. Multiple logistic regression analyses, including age, sex, family history for colorectal cancer (CRC), and family history for diverticula, were carried out. Results: During the study period, 1490 patients were enrolled; 37.2% (n = 555) showed colonic diverticula or polyps or CRC (308 males, mean age 66 years). Particularly, 12.3% (n = 183) patients presented only diverticula, 13.7% (n = 204) only polyps or cancer, 11.3% (n = 168) both diseases, and 62.7% (n = 935) neither diverticula nor polyps and cancer. A total of 38 patients presented colorectal cancer, 17 of which had also diverticula. A significant increase in relative risk (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.27-3.47, p < 0.0001) of colorectal adenoma and cancer in patients with colonic diverticula was found. At multivariate analysis, only diverticula resulted to be significantly associated with colorectal adenomas and cancer (Odds Ratio, OR 3.86, 95% CI 2.90-5.14, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: A significant association of colonic diverticula with colorectal adenoma or cancer was found. This implies that patients with colonic diverticula require a vigilant follow-up procedure for the prevention of colorectal cancer from those applicable to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Viscido
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.V.); (F.V.); (A.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Fabiana Ciccone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Giuseppe Mazzini Hospital, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (D.G.); (G.V.)
| | - Filippo Vernia
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.V.); (F.V.); (A.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Dolores Gabrieli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Giuseppe Mazzini Hospital, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (D.G.); (G.V.)
| | - Annalisa Capannolo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.V.); (F.V.); (A.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Gianpiero Stefanelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.V.); (F.V.); (A.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Stefano Necozione
- Epidemiology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Giorgio Valerii
- Gastroenterology Unit, Giuseppe Mazzini Hospital, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (D.G.); (G.V.)
| | - Hassan Ashktorab
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC 20059, USA;
| | - Giovanni Latella
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.V.); (F.V.); (A.C.); (G.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0862-434735; Fax: +39-0862-433425
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
AKKUZU MZ, SEZGİN O, ÜÇBİLEK E, ÖZDOĞAN O, AYDIN F, RIZAOĞLU BALCI H, YARAŞ S, ATES F, ALTİNTAS E. Gaitada Gizli Kan Pozitifliği Nedeniyle Kolonoskopi Yapılanlarda Kolorektal Malignite Sıklığı. MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNIVERSITESI TIP DERGISI 2020. [DOI: 10.17944/mkutfd.790954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
7
|
Moons L, Mariman A, Vermeir P, Colemont L, Clays E, Van Vlierberghe H, Vogelaers D. Sociodemographic factors and strategies in colorectal cancer screening: a narrative review and practical recommendations. Acta Clin Belg 2020; 75:33-41. [PMID: 30609904 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1563736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Worldwide colorectal cancer is a frequently occurring cancer with a high disease burden. It is the second most frequent cancer in women and the third in men. The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing because of ageing and unhealthy lifestyles.Aim: We aimed to perform a narrative literature review on methods and strategies for screening for colorectal cancer prior to colonoscopy.Design: Narrative literature review.Methods: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and The Cochrane Library were searched using keywords: 'colorectal cancer', '(mass) screening', 'occult blood', 'prevention', 'socioeconomic status', 'early diagnosis', 'Europe' and 'ethnicity'/'ethnic groups'.Results: 18 articles were included. Multiple randomised controlled trials have shown that screening programmes with faecal occult blood tests (FOBT), guaiac-FOBT (gFOBT) and immunochemical FOBT (iFOBT) represent a valid prevention strategy. Most studies favour iFOBT, because of ease to use, resulting in a higher uptake of screening, as well as a higher detection rate. A higher uptake is also achieved by mailing of the test. Overall the uptake of screening is higher in women, although more cancers are diagnosed in men. This can be explained by a lower sensitivity of FOBT in women. Furthermore, a strong correlation was found between a low socio-economic status and a low uptake of screening. The screening age lies between 50-74 years.Conclusion: Colorectal cancer is characterized by a significant incidence, morbidity and mortality. Systematic screening is effective for early detection. A non-selective test with iFOBT currently has the best validity with a higher sensitivity in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Moons
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An Mariman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Vermeir
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Els Clays
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and liver diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dirk Vogelaers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wieten E, Schreuders EH, Grobbee EJ, Nieboer D, Bramer WM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bruno MJ, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Incidence of faecal occult blood test interval cancers in population-based colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2019; 68:873-881. [PMID: 29934436 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are replacing guaiac faecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Incidence of interval colorectal cancer (iCRC) following a negative stool test result is not yet known. We aimed to compare incidence of iCRC following a negative FIT or gFOBT. DESIGN We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, PubMed and Google Scholar from inception to 12 December 2017 for citations related to CRC screening based on stool tests. We included studies on FIT or gFOBT iCRC in average-risk screening populations. Main outcome was pooled incidence rate of iCRCs per 100 000 person-years (p-y). Pooled incidence rates were obtained by fitting random-effect Poisson regression models. RESULTS We identified 7 426 records and included 29 studies. Meta-analyses comprised data of 6 987 825 subjects with a negative test result, in whom 11 932 screen-detected CRCs and 5 548 gFOBT or FIT iCRCs were documented. Median faecal haemoglobin (Hb) positivity cut-off used was 20 (range 10-200) µg Hb/g faeces in the 17 studies that provided FIT results. Pooled incidence rates of iCRC following FIT and gFOBT were 20 (95% CI 14 to 29; I2=99%) and 34 (95% CI 20 to 57; I2=99%) per 100 000 p-y, respectively. Pooled incidence rate ratio of FIT versus gFOBT iCRC was 0.58 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.07; I2=99%) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.75; I2=10%) in sensitivity analysis. For every FIT iCRC, 2.6 screen-detected CRCs were found (ratio 1:2.6); for gFOBT, the ratio between iCRC and screen-detected CRC was 1:1.2. Age below 60 years and the third screening round were significantly associated with a lower iCRC rate. CONCLUSION A negative gFOBT result is associated with a higher iCRC incidence than a negative FIT. This supports the use of FIT over gFOBT as CRC screening tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Els Wieten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eline H Schreuders
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wichor M Bramer
- Medical Library, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Samuolis N, Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Markelis R, Lunevicius R, Mickys U, Ringeleviciute U. Surgical or endoscopic management of malignant colon polyps. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88:E824-E828. [PMID: 30347496 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 06/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate indications for colectomy in T1 polyps and possible risk factors for lymph node metastasis. METHODS Between 2004 and 2017, 40 patients underwent colectomy after endoscopic removal of malignant polyps with T1 carcinoma. Resection was done based on at least one of the unfavourable histopathological criteria. We collected and prospectively studied histopathologic features, short-term results and the benefit-risk balance. Complications were assessed by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (62.5%) underwent laparoscopic bowel resection. Twenty-nine patients (63.0%) had more than two unfavourable criteria in the polyp that justified colorectal resection. Thirty-five patients (76%) had G2 (moderately differentiated) cancer, 11 (24%) had G1 (well-differentiated). Five patients (12.5%) had lymph node metastases and one (2.5%) had residual adenocarcinoma. All five patients with lymph node metastasis had G2 cancer. Nine patients (22.5%) had residual adenoma. Overall complications were identified in six (15.0%) patients. Oncologic benefit (or risk factors for lymph node metastasis) was significantly associated with polyp size ≥18 mm (P = 0.006), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.05) and budding (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Female gender, lymphovascular invasion, desmoplastic reaction, criteria for surgery ≥2 and polyp size ≥18 mm were all in complex significant risk factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Acting as a single factor, these variables had no effect to increased risk of metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikas Samuolis
- Department of Surgery, Ukmerge Hospital, Ukmerge, Lithuania
| | - Narimantas E Samalavicius
- Department of Surgery, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.,Department of General and Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Internal, Family Medicine and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Audrius Dulskas
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Internal, Family Medicine and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Department of General and Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Faculty of Health Care, University of Applied Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rytis Markelis
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Oncology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Raimundas Lunevicius
- General Surgery Department, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ugnius Mickys
- National Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Interval cancers after negative immunochemical test compared to screen and non-responders' detected cancers in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52:413-421. [PMID: 30511936 PMCID: PMC6287176 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2018-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the incidence and characteristics of interval cancers after faecal immunochemical occult blood test and calculated the test sensitivity in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme. Patients and methods The analysis included the population aged between 50 to 69 years, which was invited for screening between April 2011 and December 2012. The persons were followed-up until the next foreseen invitation, in average for 2 years. The data on interval cancers and cancers in non-responders were obtained from cancer registry. Gender, age, years of schooling, the cancer site and stage were compared among three observed groups. We used the proportional incidence method to calculate the screening test sensitivity. Results Among 502,488 persons invited for screening, 493 cancers were detected after positive screening test, 79 interval cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test and 395 in non-responders. The proportion of interval cancers was 13.8%. Among the three observed groups cancers were more frequent in men (p = 0.009) and in persons aged 60+ years (p < 0.001). Comparing screen detected and cancers in non-responders with interval cancers more interval cancers were detected in persons with 10 years of schooling or more (p = 0.029 and p = 0.001), in stage III (p = 0.027) and IV (p < 0.001), and in right hemicolon (p < 0.001). Interval cancers were more frequently in stage I than non-responders cancers (p = 0.004). Test sensitivity of faecal immunochemical test was 88.45%. Conclusions Interval cancers in Slovenian screening programme were detected in expected proportions as in similar programmes. Test sensitivity was among the highest when compared to similar programmes and was accomplished using test kit for two stool samples.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bevan R, Rutter MD. Colorectal Cancer Screening-Who, How, and When? Clin Endosc 2018; 51:37-49. [PMID: 29397655 PMCID: PMC5806924 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2017.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. It is amenable to screening as it occurs in premalignant, latent, early, and curable stages. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and national and international CRC screening guidelines were searched for CRC screening methods, populations, and timing. CRC screening can use direct or indirect tests, delivered opportunistically or via organized programs. Most CRCs are diagnosed after 60 years of age; most screening programs apply to individuals 50-75 years of age. Screening may reduce disease-specific mortality by detecting CRC in earlier stages, and CRC incidence by detecting premalignant polyps, which can subsequently be removed. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBt) was found to reduce CRC mortality by 13%-33%. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has no RCT data comparing it to no screening, but is superior to gFOBt. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) trials demonstrated an 18% reduction in CRC incidence and a 28% reduction in CRC mortality. Currently, RCT evidence for colonoscopy screening is scarce. Although not yet corroborated by RCTs, it is likely that colonoscopy is the best screening modality for an individual. From a population perspective, organized programs are superior to opportunistic screening. However, no nation can offer organized population-wide colonoscopy screening. Thus, organized programs using cheaper modalities, such as FS/FIT, can be tailored to budget and capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin Bevan
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Durham, UK
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Durham, UK
- School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blom J, Törnberg S. Interval cancers in a guaiac-based colorectal cancer screening programme: Consequences on sensitivity. J Med Screen 2017; 24:146-152. [DOI: 10.1177/0969141316682983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate interval cancers in the population-based colorectal cancer screening programme of Stockholm/Gotland, Sweden. Methods From 2008, individuals aged 60–69 were invited to colorectal cancer screening using biennial guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (Hemoccult®). Interval cancers, defined as colorectal cancer among participants not diagnosed by the screening programme but registered in the Swedish cancer register, were evaluated by cross-checking the screening histories for all cancers in the region 2008–2012. Results Of 203,848 individuals from nine different birth cohorts who participated (∼60%), 4530 (2.2%) tested positive. All invited individuals were followed up for 24 months after invitation. The cancer register reported 557 colorectal cancer, 219 (39.3%) screen-detected cancers and 338 (60.7%) interval cancers, generating both test- and episode sensitivities of approximately 40% and an interval cancer-rate of 17.1/10,000 tests. Among individuals with positive tests without colorectal cancer diagnosed at work-up colonoscopy, 37 interval cancers (10.9%) occurred. There was statistically significant lower sensitivity in women, ranging 22.4–32.2%, compared with 43.2–52.0% in men. Age-group and tumour location were not strongly correlated to screen-detected cancer rates. The programme sensitivity increased by year (20.3–25.0%), with successively more colorectal cancers diagnosed within the expanding programme (11.6–16.2%). Conclusion Interval cancer is a quality indicator of a screening programme. As the interval cancer-rate determined in a well-organized population-based screening programme was actually higher than the screen-detected cancer rate, a change to a more sensitive screening test is indicated. The lower screen-detected cancers among women, and compliance and quality of work-up colonoscopies also need attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Blom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Törnberg
- Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tinmouth J, Vella ET, Baxter NN, Dubé C, Gould M, Hey A, Ismaila N, McCurdy BR, Paszat L. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 2016:2878149. [PMID: 27597935 PMCID: PMC5002289 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2878149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction. The objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the evidence for different CRC screening tests and to determine the most appropriate ages of initiation and cessation for CRC screening and the most appropriate screening intervals for selected CRC screening tests in people at average risk for CRC. Methods. Electronic databases were searched for studies that addressed the research objectives. Meta-analyses were conducted with clinically homogenous trials. A working group reviewed the evidence to develop conclusions. Results. Thirty RCTs and 29 observational studies were included. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) prevented CRC and led to the largest reduction in CRC mortality with a smaller but significant reduction in CRC mortality with the use of guaiac fecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs). There was insufficient or low quality evidence to support the use of other screening tests, including colonoscopy, as well as changing the ages of initiation and cessation for CRC screening with gFOBTs in Ontario. Either annual or biennial screening using gFOBT reduces CRC-related mortality. Conclusion. The evidentiary base supports the use of FS or FOBT (either annual or biennial) to screen patients at average risk for CRC. This work will guide the development of the provincial CRC screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Tinmouth
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily T. Vella
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy N. Baxter
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Catherine Dubé
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Gould
- William Osler Health Centre, Etobicoke, ON, Canada
- Vaughan Endoscopy Clinic, Vaughan, ON, Canada
| | - Amanda Hey
- Northeast Cancer Centre Health Sciences North/Horizon Santé-Nord, Sudbury Outpatient Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Lawrence Paszat
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Domènech X, Garcia M, Benito L, Binefa G, Vidal C, Milà N, Moreno V. [Interval cancers and episode sensitivity in population-based screening programmes for colorectal cancer: a systematic review]. GACETA SANITARIA 2015; 29:464-71. [PMID: 26341155 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe interval cancers (IC) and the sensitivity of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted through a MEDLINE (PubMed) search. The search strategy combined the terms 'interval cancer', 'false negative', 'mass screening', 'screening' 'early detection of cancer', 'colorectal cancer' and 'bowel cancer'. Inclusion criteria consisted of population-based screening programmes, original articles written in English or Spanish and publication dates between 1999/01/01 and 2015/02/28. A narrative synthesis of the included articles was performed detailing the characteristics of the screening programmes, the IC rate, and the information sources used in each study. RESULTS Thirteen articles were included. The episode sensitivity of CRC screening programmes ranged from 42.2% to 65.3% in programmes using the guaiac test and between 59.1% and 87.0% with the immunochemical test. We found a higher proportion of women who were diagnosed with IC and these lesions were mainly located in the proximal colon. CONCLUSION There is wide variability in the IC rate in CRC programmes. To ensure comparability between programmes, there is a need for consensus on the working definition of IC and the methods used for their identification and quantification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xènia Domènech
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Montse Garcia
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.
| | - Llúcia Benito
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España; Departamento de Enfermería Fundamental y Médico-Quirúrgica, Universidad de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Gemma Binefa
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), España
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Núria Milà
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), España
| | - Víctor Moreno
- Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Instituto Catalán de Oncología-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), España; Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CMC, Dekker E, Meijer GA, Rabeneck L, Rutter MD, Valori R, Young GP, Schoen RE. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut 2015; 64:1257-67. [PMID: 25193802 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Interval colorectal cancers (interval CRCs), that is, cancers occurring after a negative screening test or examination, are an important indicator of the quality and effectiveness of CRC screening and surveillance. In order to compare incidence rates of interval CRCs across screening programmes, a standardised definition is required. Our goal was to develop an internationally applicable definition and taxonomy for reporting on interval CRCs. DESIGN Using a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus, the Expert Working Group on interval CRC of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee of the World Endoscopy Organization developed a nomenclature for defining and characterising interval CRCs. RESULTS We define an interval CRC as a "colorectal cancer diagnosed after a screening or surveillance exam in which no cancer is detected, and before the date of the next recommended exam". Guidelines and principles for describing and reporting on interval CRCs are provided, and clinical scenarios to demonstrate the practical application of the nomenclature are presented. CONCLUSIONS The Working Group on interval CRC of the World Endoscopy Organization endorses adoption of this standardised nomenclature. A standardised nomenclature will facilitate benchmarking and comparison of interval CRC rates across programmes and regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sanduleanu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine; and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - C M C le Clercq
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine; and GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - E Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Rabeneck
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; and Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK; and Durham University School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK
| | - R Valori
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
| | - G P Young
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - R E Schoen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pitkäniemi J, Seppä K, Hakama M, Malminiemi O, Palva T, Vuoristo MS, Järvinen H, Paimela H, Pikkarainen P, Anttila A, Elovainio L, Hakulinen T, Karjalainen S, Pylkkänen L, Rautalahti M, Sarkeala T, Vertio H, Malila N. Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2015; 2:e000034. [PMID: 26462283 PMCID: PMC4599169 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with guaiac-based faecal occult-blood test (FOBT) has been reported to reduce CRC mortality in randomised trials in the 1990s, but not in routine screening, so far. In Finland, a large randomised study on biennial FOB screening for CRC was gradually nested as part of the routine health services from 2004. We evaluate the effectiveness of screening as a public health policy in the largest population so far reported. Methods We randomly allocated (1:1) men and women aged 60–69 years to those invited for screening and those not invited (controls), between 2004 and 2012. This resulted in 180 210 subjects in the screening arm and 180 282 in the control arm. In 2012, the programme covered 43% of the target age population in Finland. Results The median follow-up time was 4.5 years (maximum 8.3 years), with a total of 1.6 million person-years. The CRC incidence rate ratio between the screening and control arm was 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.23). The mortality rate ratio from CRC between the screening and control arm was 1.04 (0.84 to 1.28), respectively. The CRC mortality risk ratio was 0.88 (0.66 to 1.16) and 1.33 (0.94 to 1.87) in males and females, respectively. Conclusions We did not find any effect in a randomised health services study of FOBT screening on CRC mortality. The substantial effect difference between males and females is inconsistent with the evidence from randomised clinical trials and with the recommendations of several international organisations. Even if our findings are still inconclusive, they highlight the importance of randomised evaluation when new health policies are implemented. Trial registration 002_2010_august.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Pitkäniemi
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland ; Department of Public Health , University of Helsinki , Finland
| | - K Seppä
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland
| | - M Hakama
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland ; School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland
| | | | - T Palva
- Pirkanmaa Cancer Society , Tampere , Finland
| | | | - H Järvinen
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery , Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki , Finland
| | - H Paimela
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery , University Hospital of Northern Norway , Narvik , Norway
| | - P Pikkarainen
- Department of Medicine, Tampere University Hospital , Tampere , Finland
| | - A Anttila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland
| | - L Elovainio
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland
| | - T Hakulinen
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland
| | | | - L Pylkkänen
- The Cancer Society of Finland , Helsinki , Finland
| | - M Rautalahti
- Finnish Medical Society Duodecim , Helsinki , Finland
| | - T Sarkeala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland
| | - H Vertio
- The Cancer Society of Finland , Helsinki , Finland
| | - N Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research , Helsinki , Finland ; School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Interval cancers in a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in catalonia, Spain. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:672410. [PMID: 25802515 PMCID: PMC4354714 DOI: 10.1155/2015/672410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Revised: 02/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective. To analyze interval cancers among participants in a screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) during four screening rounds. Methods. The study population consisted of participants of a fecal occult blood test-based screening program from February 2000 to September 2010, with a 30-month follow-up (n = 30,480). We used hospital administration data to identify CRC. An interval cancer was defined as an invasive cancer diagnosed within 30 months of a negative screening result and before the next recommended examination. Gender, age, stage, and site distribution of interval cancers were compared with those in the screen-detected group. Results. Within the study period, 97 tumors were screen-detected and 74 tumors were diagnosed after a negative screening. In addition, 17 CRC (18.3%) were found after an inconclusive result and 2 cases were diagnosed within the surveillance interval (2.1%). There was an increase of interval cancers over the four rounds (from 32.4% to 46.0%). When compared with screen-detected cancers, interval cancers were found predominantly in the rectum (OR: 3.66; 95% CI: 1.51-8.88) and at more advanced stages (P = 0.025). Conclusion. There are large numbers of cancer that are not detected through fecal occult blood test-based screening. The low sensitivity should be emphasized to ensure that individuals with symptoms are not falsely reassured.
Collapse
|
18
|
Sohn DK, Kim MJ, Park Y, Suh M, Shin A, Lee HY, Im JP, Cho HM, Hong SP, Kim BH, Kim Y, Kim JW, Kim HS, Nam CM, Park DI, Um JW, Oh SN, Lim HS, Chang HJ, Hahm SK, Chung JH, Kim SY, Kim Y, Lee WC, Jeong SY. The Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2015. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2015.58.5.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Kyung Sohn
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Min Ju Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Younhee Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Mina Suh
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Aesun Shin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Young Lee
- Center for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jong Pil Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoen-Min Cho
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea Saint Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sung Pil Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Baek-hui Kim
- Department of Pathology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yongsoo Kim
- Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Chung Mo Nam
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Il Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Won Um
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
| | - Soon Nam Oh
- Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwan Sub Lim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Chang
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Keun Hahm
- Department of Family Medicine/Health Promotion Center, KEPCO Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hye Chung
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Soo Young Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeol Kim
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Won-Chul Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Yong Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alexandersson BT, Hreinsson JP, Stefansson T, Jonasson JG, Bjornsson ES. The risk of colorectal cancer after an attack of uncomplicated diverticulitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49:576-80. [PMID: 24621325 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.886717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE According to clinical guidelines, a colonoscopy is recommended after an attack of diverticulitis in order to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC). This is based on studies prior to the use of computerized tomography (CT) for confirmation of the diagnosis. We aimed to investigate the findings of a subsequent colonoscopy after an attack of uncomplicated diverticulitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study cohort consisted of all patients with the diagnosis of uncomplicated diverticulitis, who underwent a subsequent colonoscopy 6-8 weeks later during a 6-years period in the National University Hospital of Iceland. The diagnosis of diverticulitis was based on clinical symptoms verified with a CT of the abdomen. Relevant clinical information was obtained from medical records and from the Icelandic Cancer Registry. RESULTS A total of 282 patients had uncomplicated diverticulitis and 199 patients underwent endoscopy. Two patients had CRC (0.7%), diagnosed with diverticulitis but did not recover clinically. All other patients recovered clinically. Colonic polyps were found in 33 of 195 (17%) cases. In 19/33 (58%) cases the histology demonstrated hyperplastic polyps, and in 13/33 (39%) adenoma with mild dysplasia. Only 1/33 (3%) of the colonic polyps were >1 cm in size. CONCLUSIONS Among patients experiencing an attack of uncomplicated diverticulitis the frequency of CRC was equal to what might be expected compared to the average risk in the population. In these patients a routine colonoscopy in the absence of other clinical signs of CRC seems hardly necessary, if the clinical course is uneventful and the patient recovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarki T Alexandersson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The National University Hospital , Reykjavik , Iceland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parente F, Bargiggia S, Boemo C, Vailati C, Bonoldi E, Ardizzoia A, Ilardo A, Tortorella F, Gallus S. Anatomic distribution of cancers and colorectal adenomas according to age and sex and relationship between proximal and distal neoplasms in an i-FOBT-positive average-risk Italian screening cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29:57-64. [PMID: 23975054 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1759-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Subsite-specific incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomas may vary considerably by race, sex and age as well as due to different screening strategies. We assessed variations in the anatomical distribution of adenomas according to age and sex in an average-risk screening cohort testing positive at immunological faecal occult blood test (i-FOBT) in northern Italy. METHODS Data from 2,281 consecutive asymptomatic i-FOBT-positive subjects ageing 50-70 years undergone colonoscopy were reviewed. Size, number, macroscopic and histological features of all adenomas found as well as their proximal or distal location in relation to the splenic flexure were examined. Odds ratios (OR) of proximal neoplasms, according to the presence of distal neoplasms and other selected covariates were assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 2,599 neoplasms were found in 1,396 patients. Of these, 116 (5 %) were colorectal cancers, diagnosed in 106 patients. Out of 2,483 adenomas found, 1,564 (63 %) were sessile, 795 (32 %) were peduncolated and 124 (5 %) were flat-type; 54 % of all adenomas were tubular, 36 % were tubulovillous or villous, and 10 % were serrated adenomas. The majority of neoplasms (66 %) were located in the distal colon. Tumour subsite distribution was consistent in both sexes, whereas significant proximal migration of neoplasms occurred in the older age cohort. Indeed, the rate of proximal neoplasms in patients aged ≥60 years was 37 % as compared with 29 % in those ageing 50-59 years. Male gender (OR 1.84), age of 60 years or older (OR 1.44), having a family history of colorectal neoplasms (OR 1.47) and presence of at least 1 distal advanced adenoma (OR 1.63) were all significant predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS A left to right shift of colorectal adenomas with increasing age is evident in northern Italian asymptomatic i-FOBT-positive population. Advanced proximal neoplasms are not uncommon in subjects with or without distal adenomas, especially after 60 years of age. This should be carefully considered when implementing public screening strategies for CRC since the use of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening tool, particularly in older age groups, appears to be less effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Parente
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Oncology, A.Manzoni Hospital, Via dell'Eremo 9/11, 23900, Lecco, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, Odgaard‐Jensen J, Hoff G. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD009259. [PMID: 24085634 PMCID: PMC9365065 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009259.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer in the world. As the sojourn time for this cancer is several years and a good prognosis is associated with early stage diagnosis, screening has been implemented in a number of countries. Both screening with faecal occult blood test and flexible sigmoidoscopy have been shown to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in randomised controlled trials. The comparative effectiveness of these tests on colorectal cancer mortality has, however, never been evaluated, and controversies exist over which test to choose. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy to faecal occult blood testing. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (November 16, 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 11) and reference lists for eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy or faecal occult blood testing to each other or to no screening. Only studies reporting mortality from colorectal cancer were included. Faecal occult blood testing had to be repeated (annually or biennially). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data retrieval and assessment of risk of bias were performed independently by two review authors. Standard meta-analyses using a random-effects model were conducted for flexible sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) separately and we calculated relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used a Bayesian approach (a contrast-based network meta-analysis method) for indirect analyses and presented the results as posterior median relative risk with 95% credibility intervals. We assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We identified nine studies comprising 338,467 individuals randomised to screening and 405,919 individuals to the control groups. Five studies compared flexible sigmoidoscopy to no screening and four studies compared repetitive guaiac-based FOBT (annually and biennially) to no screening. We did not consider that study risk of bias reduced our confidence in our results. We did not identify any studies comparing the two screening methods directly. When compared with no screening, colorectal cancer mortality was lower with flexible sigmoidoscopy (relative risk 0.72; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.79, high quality evidence) and FOBT (relative risk 0.86; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.92, high quality evidence). In the analyses based on indirect comparison of the two screening methods, the relative risk of dying from colorectal cancer was 0.85 (95% credibility interval 0.72 to 1.01, low quality evidence) for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening compared to FOBT. No complications occurred after the FOBT test itself, but 0.03% of participants suffered a major complication after follow-up. Among more than 60,000 flexible sigmoidoscopy screening procedures and almost 6000 work-up colonoscopies, a major complication was recorded in 0.08% of participants. Adverse event data should be interpreted with caution as the reporting of adverse effects was incomplete. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high quality evidence that both flexible sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing reduce colorectal cancer mortality when applied as screening tools. There is low quality indirect evidence that screening with either approach reduces colorectal cancer deaths more than the other. Major complications associated with screening require validation from studies with more complete reporting of harms
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Holme
- Sorlandet Hospital KristiansandDepartment of MedicineServicebox 416KristiansandNorway4604
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- University of OsloInstitute of Health and Society, Dep. of Health Management and Health EconomicsPO Box 1089 BlindernOsloNorway0318
| | - Atle Fretheim
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesGlobal Health UnitOsloNorway
| | - Jan Odgaard‐Jensen
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesGlobal Health UnitOsloNorway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Telemark HospitalR&DUlefossvatnSkienNorway3710
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Morris EJA, Whitehouse LE, Farrell T, Nickerson C, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Rutter MD, Rees C, Finan PJ, Wilkinson JR, Patnick J. A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:757-64. [PMID: 22850549 PMCID: PMC3425974 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is common in England and, with long-term survival relatively poor, improving outcomes is a priority. A major initiative to reduce mortality from the disease has been the introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Combining data from the BCSP with that in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) allows all tumours diagnosed in England to be categorised according to their involvement with the BCSP. This study sought to quantify the characteristics of the tumours diagnosed within and outside the BCSP and investigate its impact on outcomes. Methods: Linkage of the NCDR and BCSP data allowed all tumours diagnosed between July 2006 and December 2008 to be categorised into four groups; screen-detected tumours, screening-interval tumours, tumours diagnosed in non-participating invitees and tumours diagnosed in those never invited to participate. The characteristics, management and outcome of tumours in each category were compared. Results: In all, 76 943 individuals were diagnosed with their first primary colorectal cancer during the study period. Of these 2213 (2.9%) were screen-detected, 623 (0.8%) were screening-interval cancers, 1760 (2.3%) were diagnosed in individuals in non-participating invitees and 72 437 (94.1%) were diagnosed in individuals not invited to participate in the programme due to its ongoing roll-out over the time period studied. Screen-detected tumours were identified at earlier Dukes’ stages, were more likely to be managed with curative intent and had significantly better outcomes than tumours in other categories. Conclusion: Screen-detected cancers had a significantly better prognosis than other tumours and this would suggest that the BCSP should reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J A Morris
- Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Level 6, Bexley Wing, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sai VF, Velayos F, Neuhaus J, Westphalen AC. Colonoscopy after CT diagnosis of diverticulitis to exclude colon cancer: a systematic literature review. Radiology 2012; 263:383-90. [PMID: 22517956 PMCID: PMC3329267 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the prevalence of underlying adenocarcinoma of the colon in patients in whom acute diverticulitis was diagnosed at computed tomography (CT) and to compare that to the prevalence of colon cancer in the general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed to find articles in which patients with CT diagnosis of acute diverticulitis underwent surgery, colonoscopy, or barium enema study within 24 weeks. Patients meeting these criteria were included for analysis. A pooled prevalence of cancer was calculated on the basis of a random effects model and compared qualitatively with the prevalence of cancer in the general population. The 95% confidence intervals around the prevalence of cancer in the study populations were determined. RESULTS Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. Data from these articles included only 771 patients who underwent surgery, colonoscopy, or barium enema study within 24 weeks of diagnosis. Fourteen patients were found to have colon cancer, for a prevalence of 2.1% (95% confidence interval: 1.2%, 3.2%). This compares to a calculated estimated prevalence of 0.68% among U.S. adults older than 55 years. CONCLUSION There are limited data to support the recommendation to perform colonoscopy after a diagnosis of acute diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor F Sai
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Park DD, Shin R, Kim JS, Oh HK, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Park JG. Clinical features of colorectal cancer detected by the national cancer screening program. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF COLOPROCTOLOGY 2010; 26:420-3. [PMID: 21221243 PMCID: PMC3017978 DOI: 10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2010] [Accepted: 09/16/2010] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since 2004, the National Cancer Screening Program of Korea has included colorectal cancer screening based on primary screening with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). We report on the clinical features of colorectal cancer detected by the National Cancer Screening Program. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 577 patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer at the Seoul National University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2009. We compared the clinical features of colorectal cancers detected by the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP group) with those of the control group in terms of age, gender, preoperative symptom, location of the tumor, surgical technique and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. RESULTS Age, gender, location of the tumor and operation types were not different between the two groups. The proportion of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher in the NCSP group than it was in the control group (86.5% vs. 20.0%; P < 0.001). The proportion of less invasive lesions (T1 or T2) was significantly higher in the NCSP group (46.3% vs. 27.7%; P = 0.002). The pathologic stages of the colorectal cancers in the NCSP group were I, 40.3%; II, 17.9%; III, 40.3% and IV, 1.5% whereas in the control group, they were I, 20.8%; II, 32.9%; III, 34.9% and IV, 11.4%. The proportion of stage I cancer was significantly higher in the NCSP group than in the control group (40.3% vs. 20.8%; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates the FOBT in the NCSP is effective in early detection of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae-Do Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|