Non-operative management and immune function after splenic injury

Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document

Background

In 2017, the World Society of Emergency Surgery published its guidelines for the management of adult and pediatric patients with splenic trauma. Several issues regarding the follow-up of patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM remained unsolved.

Methods

Using a modified Delphi method, we sought to explore ongoing areas of controversy in the NOM of splenic trauma and reach a consensus among a group of 48 international experts from five continents (Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania, America) concerning optimal follow-up strategies in patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM.

Results

Consensus was reached on eleven clinical research questions and 28 recommendations with an agreement rate ≥ 80%. Mobilization after 24 h in low-grade splenic trauma patients (WSES Class I, AAST Grades I–II) was suggested, while in patients with high-grade splenic injuries (WSES Classes II–III, AAST Grades III–V), if no other contraindications to early mobilization exist, safe mobilization of the patient when three successive hemoglobins 8 h apart after the first are within 10% of each other was considered safe according to the panel. The panel suggests adult patients to be admitted to hospital for 1 day (for low-grade splenic injuries—WSES Class I, AAST Grades I–II) to 3 days (for high-grade splenic injuries—WSES Classes II–III, AAST Grades III–V), with those with high-grade injuries requiring admission to a monitored setting. In the absence of specific complications, the panel suggests DVT and VTE prophylaxis with LMWH to be started within 48–72 h from hospital admission. The panel suggests splenic artery embolization (SAE) as the first-line intervention in patients with hemodynamic stability and arterial blush on CT scan, irrespective of injury grade. Regarding patients with WSES Class II blunt splenic injuries (AAST Grade III) without contrast extravasation, a low threshold for SAE has been suggested in the presence of risk factors for NOM failure. The panel also suggested angiography and eventual SAE in all hemodynamically stable adult patients with WSES Class III injuries (AAST Grades IV–V), even in the absence of CT blush, especially when concomitant surgery that requires change of position is needed. Follow-up imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound/CT scan in 48–72 h post-admission of trauma in splenic injuries WSES Class II (AAST Grade III) or higher treated with NOM was considered the best strategy for timely detection of vascular complications.

Conclusion

This consensus document could help guide future prospective studies aiming at validating the suggested strategies through the implementation of prospective trauma databases and the subsequent production of internationally endorsed guidelines on the issue.

Occurrence of spontaneous fistulas detected by contrast filling during computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage placement of splenic and perisplenic fluid collections

BACKGROUND

Fistulas are serious complications of splenic and perisplenic fluid accumulations, which are often difficult to detect by routine imaging methods.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the occurrence of spontaneous fistulas detectable during computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage placement (CTGDP) with contrast filling of splenic or perisplenic fluid collections and to assess characteristics in comparison with perihepatic or peripancreatic fluid accumulations, also being treated with CTGDP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 127 CTGDP-procedures, pre-interventional CTs conducted with intravenous contrast agent were compared to post-interventional CTs including contrast filling of the drain to identify spontaneous fistulas. Patient and case characteristics were evaluated, and therapeutic consequences of fistula identification were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 43 perisplenic, 40 peripancreatic, and 44 perihepatic drains were evaluated; 13 (30.2%) perisplenic, 7 (17.5%) peripancreatic, and 10 (22.7%) perihepatic fistulas were observed. Concerning the frequency of fistulas, no significant difference was found between the patient groups (P = 0.39). All fistulas were solely proven in CT scans including contrast filling of the drain. Seven fistulas (23.3%) required additional interventions. Perihepatic drains were significantly more often associated with recent surgery (P < 0.001). The mean size of peripancreatic drains was significantly greater (11.8 ± 3.9 F; P < 0.001) than in perihepatic or perisplenic fluid collections.

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous fistulas detected during CTGDP of splenic or perisplenic fluid collections are common. Post-interventional contrast filling of the drain drastically improves the detection rate of perisplenic, peripancreatic and perihepatic fistulas simultaneously initiating appropriate follow-up interventions.

Proposal of standardization of every step of angiographic procedure in bleeding patients from pelvic trauma

Trauma accounts for a third of the deaths in Western countries, exceeded only by cardiovascular disease and cancer. The high risk of massive bleeding, which depends not only on the type of fractures, but also on the severity of any associated parenchymal injuries, makes pelvic fractures one of the most life-threatening skeletal injuries, with a high mortality rate. Therefore, pelvic trauma represents an important condition to correctly and early recognize, manage, and treat. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach involving trauma surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, emergency room physicians and interventional radiologists is needed to promptly manage the resuscitation of pelvic trauma patients and ensure the best outcomes, both in terms of time and costs. Over the years, the role of interventional radiology in the management of patient bleeding due to pelvic trauma has been increasing. However, the current guidelines on the management of these patients do not adequately reflect or address the varied nature of injuries faced by the interventional radiologist. In fact, in the therapeutic algorithm of these patients, after the word “ANGIO”, there are no reports on the different possibilities that an interventional radiologist has to face during the procedure. Furthermore, variations exist in the techniques and materials for performing angioembolization in bleeding patients with pelvic trauma. Due to these differences, the outcomes differ among different published series. This article has the aim to review the recent literature on optimal imaging assessment and management of pelvic trauma, defining the role of the interventional radiologist within the multidisciplinary team, suggesting the introduction of common and unequivocal terminology in every step of the angiographic procedure. Moreover, according to these suggestions, the present paper tries to expand the previously drafted algorithm exploring the role of the interventional radiologist in pelvic trauma, especially given the multidisciplinary setting.

Splenic embolization in trauma: results of a survey from an international cohort

PURPOSE

A questionnaire regarding splenic embolization in trauma was submitted to an international sample of IR faculty members, to compare their practice to the available recommendations.

METHODS

A 21 multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to an international cohort of 96 IR faculty. Questions included the initial patient evaluation, embolization materials and techniques, post-procedure management, availability of an institutional protocol, and use of guidelines.

RESULTS

For each question, there were from a minimum of 45 to a maximum of 52 responders: 94% require a CT with contrast prior to embolization, and 87% use the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) scale to grade the splenic injuries. Embolization is performed across all values of the AAST scale. Of the patients with injuries of grade III or greater, embolization is primarily done for those patients who are hemodynamically stable. Unstable patients are embolized less frequently and primarily in cases in which the injuries are of a lower grade. Coils are the preferred material for proximal embolization (69%). Particles/Gelfoam is the preferred material for distal embolization (38%). In total, 63% administer intravenous antibiotics before the procedure and 15% administer intra-arterial antibiotics during the procedure. After embolization, follow-up imaging is recommended by 87%, antibiotics are administered regularly by 33%, clinical follow-up is recommended by 73%, and vaccination against encapsulated organisms is routinely recommended by 39%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability among a heterogeneous cohort of respondents. Available recommendations may not be sufficiently addressing the practice of splenic embolization.

Damage control surgery for splenic trauma: "preserve an organ - preserve a life"

The spleen is one of the most commonly injured solid organs of the abdominal cavity and an early diagnosis can reduce the associated mortality. Over the past couple of decades, management of splenic injuries has evolved to a prefered non-operative approach even in severely injured cases. However, the optimal surgical management of splenic trauma in severely injured patients remains controversial. This article aims to present an algorithm for the management of splenic trauma in severely injured patients, that includes basic principles of damage control surgery and is based on the experience obtained by the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) of Cali, Colombia. The choice between a conservative or a surgical approach depends on the hemodynamic status of the patient. In hemodynamically stable patients, a computed tomography angiogram should be performed to determine if non-operative management is feasible and if angioembolization is required. While hemodynamically unstable patients should be transferred immediately to the operating room for damage control surgery, which includes splenic packing and placement of a negative pressure dressing, followed by angiography with embolization of any ongoing arterial bleeding. It is our recommendation that both damage control principles and emerging endovascular technologies should be applied to achieve splenic salvage when possible. However, if surgical bleeding persists a splenectomy may be required as a definitive lifesaving maneuver.

Post-traumatic Splenic Injury Outcomes for Nonoperative and Operative Management: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Splenectomies are widely performed, but there exists controversy regarding care for splenic injury patients. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature over the last 20 years for operative management (OM) versus nonoperative management (NOM) versus splenic artery embolization (SAE) for traumatic splenic injuries and associated outcomes.

METHODS

A review of literature was performed following the PRISMA guidelines through a search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, JAMA Network, and SAGE journals from 2000 to 2020 regarding splenic injury in trauma patients and their management. Articles were then selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria with GRADE criteria used on the included articles to assess quality.

RESULTS

Twenty retrospective cohorts and one prospective cohort assessed patients who received OM versus NOM or SAE. Multiple studies indicated that NOM, in properly selected patients, provided better outcomes than its operative counterpart.

CONCLUSION

This review provides additional evidence to support the NOM of splenic injuries for hemodynamically stable patients with benign abdomens as it accounts for consistently shorter hospital length of stay, fewer complications, and lower mortality than OM. For hemodynamically unstable patients, management continues to be intervention with surgery. More studies are needed to further investigate outcomes of post-splenectomy patients based on grade of injury, hemodynamic status, type of procedure (i.e., SAE), and failure of NOM in order to provide additional evidence and improve outcomes for this patient population.

Increased long-term pneumonia risk for the trauma-related splenectomized population - a population-based, propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Splenectomy is the life-saving treatment for high-grade spleen trauma. Splenectomized patients are at a significant infection risk. However, the trauma-induced splenectomy results in less incidence of postsplenectomy infection than the hematologic disorder. We conducted a large-scale study to identify the infection rate and management strategy in trauma-related splenic injuries.

METHODS

We included patients with the diagnosis of spleen injury in Taiwan from January 2003 to December 2013 by using the National Health Insurance Database and divided them into spleen preserved and splenectomized groups. The demographic factors including age, sex, hospital level, year of injury, trauma mechanism, associated injuries, whether injury severity score ≧16, and comorbidities were extracted. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed, and we analyzed the long-term outcome as the presence of infection-related disease (septicemia, pneumonia, and meningitis) after spleen trauma. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factor for each outcome.

RESULTS

During the 11 years included in this study, a total of 8,897 patients with spleen trauma were identified. A total of 3,520 (39.6%) patients were splenectomized, and 5,377 (60.4%) were spleen preserved. After propensity score matching, 3,099 pairs of patients were enrolled for further analysis. In univariate analysis, the incidence of pneumonia is significantly higher in the splenectomized group (8.5% vs 7.0%, P = .037). There was no significant difference in septicemia and meningitis between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, splenectomy is an independent risk factor for pneumonia in long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the spleen preserved group, splenectomy is related to an increased likelihood of long-term pneumonia onset but not to an increase in the possibility of other infections.

Intermittent Splenic Artery Occlusion Plus Gauze Compression Is a Simple and Effective Treatment for Iatrogenic Splenic Injury

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intermittent splenic artery occlusion plus gauze compression in treating iatrogenic splenic injury.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 12 iatrogenic splenic injury cases (grade I to III) treated with intermittent splenic artery occlusion plus gauze compression. The hemostatic effect was then observed after unblocking and decompression. The total operation time, gauze compression time, total blood loss, blood loss from the injured spleen, and platelet counts of each patient before and 1 week after surgery were noted.

Results

The average operation time was 209.58±57.11 min, and the average gauze compression time after spleen artery occlusion was 23.75±4.33 min. The average total blood loss and blood loss due to iatrogenic spleen injury were 468.33±138.22 ml and 264.17±165.72 ml, respectively. Two cases (both grade I) had successful hemostasis after 15 min of splenic artery occlusion and wound compression. Another 9 cases (all grade II) and 1 case (grade III) attained hemostasis after 25 min and 30 min, respectively, of splenic artery occlusion and wound compression. The platelet counts of all patients were within the normal range before and 1 week after surgery. No postoperative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Intermittent splenic artery occlusion plus gauze compression is a simple and effective treatment for iatrogenic splenic injury.

Non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries-practical aspects and value of radiological scoring systems

Background

Non-operative management (NOM) of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries has become popular in haemodynamically stable adult patients, despite uncertainty about efficacy, patient selection, and details of management. Up-to-date strategies and practical recommendations are presented.

Methods

A selective literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (1989–2016).

Results

No randomized clinical trial was found. Non-randomized controlled trials and large retrospective and prospective series dominate. Few systematic reviews and meta-analyses are available. NOM of selected patients with blunt liver and spleen injuries is associated with low morbidity and mortality. Only data of limited evidence are available on intensity and duration of patient monitoring, repeat imaging, antithrombotic prophylaxis and return to normal activity. There is high-level evidence on early mobilisation and post-splenectomy vaccination.

Conclusion

NOM of blunt liver or spleen injuries is a worldwide trend, but the literature does not provide high-grade evidence for this strategy.

Splenic implant preservation after conservation in lactated Ringer´s solution

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the morphology and function of autogenous splenic tissue implanted in the greater omentum, 24 hours after storage in Ringer-lactate solution.

METHODS

we divided 35 male rats into seven groups (n=5): Group 1: no splenectomy; Group 2: total splenectomy without implant; Group 3: total splenectomy and immediate autogenous implant; Group 4: total splenectomy, preservation of the spleen in Ringer-lactate at room temperature, then sliced ​​and implanted; Group 5: total splenectomy, ​​spleen sliced and preserved in Ringer-lactate at room temperature before implantation; Group 6: total splenectomy with preservation of the spleen in Ringer-lactate at 4°C and then sliced ​​and implanted; Group 7: total splenectomy and the spleen sliced for preservation in Ringer-lactate at 4°C before implantation. After 90 days, we performed scintigraphic studies with Tc99m-colloidal tin (liver, lung, spleen or implant and clot), haematological exams (erythrogram, leucometry, platelets), biochemical dosages (protein electrophoresis) and anatomopathological studies.

RESULTS

regeneration of autogenous splenic implants occurred in the animals of the groups with preservation of the spleen at 4ºC. The uptake of colloidal tin was higher in groups 1, 3, 6 and 7 compared with the others. There was no difference in hematimetric values ​​in the seven groups. Protein electrophoresis showed a decrease in the gamma fraction in the group of splenectomized animals in relation to the operated groups.

CONCLUSION

the splenic tissue preserved in Ringer-lactate solution at 4ºC maintains its morphological structure and allows functional recovery after being implanted on the greater omentum.

Clinical features and outcomes of blunt splenic injury in children: A retrospective study in a single institution in China

Although the spleen is the most commonly injured intra-abdominal organ after blunt trauma, there are limited data available in China. The objectives of this study were to investigate the clinical features and determine the risk factors for operative management (OM) in children with blunt splenic injury (BSI).A review of the medical records of children diagnosed with BSI between January 2010 and September 2016 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University was performed.A total of 101 patients diagnosed with BSI were recruited, including 76 patients transferred from other hospitals. The male-to-female ratio was 2.06:1, with a mean age of 7.8 years old. The most common injury season was summer and the most common injury mechanism was road traffic accidents. Sixty-eight patients suffered multiple injuries. Thirty-four patients received blood transfusions. Two patients died from multiple organ failure or hemorrhagic shock. Significant differences were observed in the injury season, injury mechanism, injury date, and hemoglobin levels between the isolated injury group and the multiple injuries group. The overall operative rate was 29.7%. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age, blood transfusion, and grade of injury were independent risk factors for OM.Our study provided evidence that the management of pediatric BSI was variable. The operative rate in pediatric BSI may be higher in certain patient groups. Although nonoperative management is one of the standard treatment options, our data suggest that OM is an appropriate way to treat patients who are hemodynamically unstable.

Surgical Management of Solid Organ Injuries

Surgery used to be the treatment of choice in patients with solid organ injuries. This has changed over the past 2 decades secondary to advances in noninvasive diagnostic techniques, increased availability of less invasive procedures, and a better understanding of the natural history of solid organ injuries. Now, nonoperative management (NOM) has become the initial management strategy used for most solid organ injuries. Even though NOM has become the standard of care in patients with solid organ injuries in most trauma centers, surgeons should not hesitate to operate on a patient to control life-threatening hemorrhage.

Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients

Spleen injuries are among the most frequent trauma-related injuries. At present, they are classified according to the anatomy of the injury. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic derangement, and the associated injuries. The management of splenic trauma patients aims to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology especially considering the modern tools for bleeding management. Thus, the management of splenic trauma should be ultimately multidisciplinary and based on the physiology of the patient, the anatomy of the injury, and the associated lesions. Lastly, as the management of adults and children must be different, children should always be treated in dedicated pediatric trauma centers. In fact, the vast majority of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma can be managed non-operatively. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of splenic trauma and the management guidelines.

The treatment of spleen injuries: a retrospective study

Background

Hemorrhage after blunt trauma is a major contributor to death after trauma. In the abdomen, an injured spleen is the most frequent cause of major bleeding. Splenectomy is historically the treatment of choice. In 2007, non-operative management (NOM) with splenic artery embolization (SAE) was introduced in our institution. The indication for SAE is hemodynamically stable patients with extravasation of contrast, or grade 3–5 spleen injury according to the Abbreviated Organ Injury Scale 2005, Update 2008. We wanted to examine if the introduction of SAE increased the rate of salvaged spleens in our trauma center.

Method

All patients discharged with the diagnosis of splenic injury in the period 01.01.2000 – 31.12.2013 from the University Hospital of North Norway Tromsø were included in the study. Patients admitted for rehabilitation purposes or with an iatrogenic injury were excluded.

Results

A total of 109 patients were included in the study. In the period 2000-7, 20 of 52 patients were splenectomized. During 2007-13, there were 6 splenectomies and 24 SAE among 57 patients. The reduction in splenectomies is significant (p < 0.001). There is an increase in the rate of treated patients (splenectomy and SAE) from 38 to 53 % in the two time periods, but not significantly (p = 0.65).

Conclusion

The rate of salvaged spleens has increased after the introduction of SAE in our center.

Trial registration

The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identification number NCT01965548.

Increased Risk of Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Strokes in Patients With Splenic Injury and Splenectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

The spleen is a crucial organ in humans. Little is known about the association between stroke and splenic injury or splenectomy. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of stroke in patients with splenic injury and splenectomy.A nationwide cohort study was conducted by analyzing the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. For comparison, control patients were selected and matched with splenic injury patients in a ratio of 4:1 according to age, sex, and the year of hospitalization. We analyzed the risks of stroke using a Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis.A total of 11,273 splenic injury patients, including 5294 splenectomized and 5979 nonsplenectomized patients, and 45,092 control patients were included in this study. The incidence rates of stroke were 8.05, 6.53, and 4.25 per 1000 person-years in splenic injury patients with splenectomy, those without splenectomy, and the control cohort, respectively. Compared with the control cohort, splenic injury patients with splenectomy exhibited a 2.05-fold increased risk of stroke (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.34), whereas those without splenectomy exhibited a 1.74-fold increased risk (95% CI 1.51-2). Splenectomy entailed an additional 1.21-fold increased risk of stroke compared with nonsplenectomy in patients with splenic injury.This study revealed that splenic injury and splenectomy were significantly associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes. The results of this study may alert physicians and patients to the complications of splenic injury and splenectomy.

Spleen function after preservation in a physiological solution

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphology and function of implanted autogenous spleen tissue after 24 h of preservation in a physiological solution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five male rats were divided into seven groups (n = 5): group 1, without surgical procedure; group 2, total splenectomy; group 3, total splenectomy and immediate implant of autogenous spleen tissue; group 4, total splenectomy and preservation of the entire spleen in lactated Ringer solution at room temperature for 24 h, followed by spleen sectioning and implantation; group 5, total splenectomy, followed by spleen sectioning and preservation in lactated Ringer solution at room temperature for 24 h and subsequent implantation of the slices; group 6, total splenectomy and preservation of the entire spleen in lactated Ringer solution at 4°C for 24 h, followed by spleen sectioning and implantation; and group 7, total splenectomy, the spleen was sliced and preserved in lactate Ringer solution at 4°C for 24 h, followed by implantation of the slices. After 90 d, scintigraphic studies using sulfur colloid labeled with 99mTc of the liver, lungs, spleen, implants, and a blood clot were performed. Hematological (erythrogram, leukogram, and platelets) and histologic studies were carried out.

RESULTS

The autogenous splenic implants regenerated in all animals that received those implants preserved at 4°C and immediately after excision. The scintigraphic study showed a better phagocytic function in groups 1, 3, 6, and 7. No difference was observed in the hematological study.

CONCLUSIONS

Spleen tissue preserved in lactated Ringer solution at 4°C for 24 h maintains its vitality and capacity to recover hematological and phagocytic functions.

Twenty-years of splenic preservation at a level 1 pediatric trauma center

BACKGROUND

Splenic preservation is the standard of care for hemodynamically stable children with splenic injuries. We report a 20-year single-institutional series of children with splenic injuries managed without a splenectomy.

METHODS

Children evaluated and treated for blunt splenic injury at Boston Children's Hospital from 1994 to 2014 were extracted from the trauma registry. Demographics, clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes were reviewed. Three time-periods were evaluated based upon the development and modification of splenic injury clinical pathway guidelines (CPGs). Survival was defined as being discharged from the hospital alive.

RESULTS

502 suffered isolated splenic injuries. The median AAST grade of splenic injury increased across the three CPG time periods (p<0.001). No splenic-injury related mortalities occurred. Hospital length of stay decreased significantly secondary to splenic injury CPGs (p<0.001). 99% of the patients were discharged home.

CONCLUSION

In children managed over the last 20years for isolated splenic injury, no patient died or underwent splenectomy. Hospital length of stay decreased across time, despite an increase in the severity of splenic injuries encountered. Splenectomy has become so unusual in the management of hemodynamically stable children with a splenic injury that it may no longer be a legitimate outcome marker.

Idiopathic splenic arteriovenous fistula without splenic artery aneurysm

Splenic arteriovenous fistula (SAVF) without a splenic arterial aneurysm is a rare entity and may either be congenital or acquired. Acquired SAVFs are commonly due to adjacent splenic arterial aneurysm rupture, trauma or infection. We report a large idiopathic SAVF in a 50-year-old woman who had no symptoms. CT showed that the fistula was around the splenic hilum and no other specific findings. SAVF has a risk of sudden onset of portal hypertension and it should be treated as soon as diagnosed. Endovascular treatment for SAVF is now being performed successfully with increasing frequency, however, there is still no definitive evidence of treatment for SAVF. Treatment options should be determined appropriately depending on individual case characteristics and vascular anatomical variations. Our case was treated successfully with splenectomy, and long-term results are good without need of reintervention.

Possible infectious causes of spontaneous splenic rupture: a case report

Introduction

Spontaneous atraumatic splenic rupture is a rare but dramatic occurrence that is most commonly attributed to infection or neoplasia. Deciphering the etiology can be challenging with many cases remaining unclear despite full investigation.

Case presentation

We report the case of a previously healthy and immunocompetent 52-year-old Caucasian woman with a remote history of clinically diagnosed infectious mononucleosis who experienced sudden atraumatic splenic rupture after an untreated stray cat bite.

Conclusions

The differential diagnosis for atraumatic splenic rupture, specifically its infectious causes, is reviewed. Key clinical and laboratory findings that differentiate Bartonella henselae infection and Epstein–Barr virus reinfection are reviewed.

Antibody response to a T-cell-independent antigen is preserved after splenic artery embolization for trauma

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is increasingly being used as a nonoperative management strategy for patients with blunt splenic injury following trauma. The aim of this study was to assess the splenic function of patients who were embolized. A clinical study was performed, with splenic function assessed by examining the antibody response to polysaccharide antigens (pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine), B-cell subsets, and the presence of Howell-Jolly bodies (HJB). The data were compared to those obtained from splenectomized patients and healthy controls (HC) who had been included in a previously conducted study. A total of 30 patients were studied: 5 who had proximal SAE, 7 who had distal SAE, 8 who had a splenectomy, and 10 HC. The median vaccine-specific antibody response of the SAE patients (fold increase, 3.97) did not differ significantly from that of the HC (5.29; P = 0.90); however, the median response of the splenectomized patients (2.30) did differ (P = 0.003). In 2 of the proximally embolized patients and none of the distally embolized patients, the ratio of the IgG antibody level postvaccination compared to that prevaccination was <2. There were no significant differences in the absolute numbers of lymphocytes or B-cell subsets between the SAE patients and the HC. HJB were not observed in the SAE patients. The splenic immune function of embolized patients was preserved, and therefore routine vaccination appears not to be indicated. Although the median antibody responses did not differ between the patients who underwent proximal SAE and those who underwent distal SAE, 2 of the 5 proximally embolized patients had insufficient responses to vaccination, whereas none of the distally embolized patients exhibited an insufficient response. Further research should be done to confirm this finding.

Splenectomy results from an 18-year single centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Splenectomy is performed both as an emergency procedure following trauma and electively when indicated for haematological disease. Postsplenectomy patients receive immunotherapy vaccines and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Despite well documented concerns regarding complications and overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI) risk, there appears to be only a small amount of consistent data on long-term outcomes. The authors therefore present their postsplenectomy patient outcomes over an 18-year follow-up period.

METHODS

One hundred and five postsplenectomy patients operated on between 1991 and 2011 were identified from pathology codes and their case notes were reviewed. Eighty-eight patients (83.8%) were followed up for at least five years or until death.

RESULTS

Of the 105 splenectomy patients (58 were male), the median age was 54 years (range: 10-87 years) and the median survival was 80 months. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 21.0% (n=22) and 8.6% (n=9) respectively. Thirty-seven patients (27 males) underwent an emergency splenectomy with a median age, operative morbidity and operative mortality of 51 years, 13.5% and 21.6% (n=8) respectively. This compares with 68 patients (35 males) undergoing an elective splenectomy with the same parameters respectively of 55 years, 25.0% and 1.5% (n=1). Excluding operative deaths, multivariate analysis revealed age (p=0.002) as the only significant and independent prognostic indicator. Immunotherapy and antibiotic prophylaxis rates for the emergency cohort were 92.6% and 88.9% respectively, compared with 90.2% and 93.4% for the elective cohort. At follow-up, no patients were readmitted with OPSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Over an 18-year period and a diverse indication for splenectomy, we have identified no evidence of OPSI. However, a significant operative mortality was associated with traumatic splenic rupture.

Delayed formation of splenic pseudoaneurysm following nonoperative management in blunt splenic injury: multi-institutional study in Osaka, Japan

BACKGROUND

Delayed rupture is well-known as a severe complication after splenic injury treated with nonoperative management (NOM). The incidence and timing of splenic pseudoaneurysm (SPA) formation, which is a cause of delayed rupture following splenic injury, have not been thoroughly investigated, and the timing of follow-up computed tomography (CT) is controversial. The objective of this study was to clarify the incidence and timing of both the delayed formation and spontaneous resolution of SPA following splenic injuries treated with NOM in several trauma centers in Japan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all patients with documented blunt splenic injury who were treated with NOM from 2003 through 2010 in five trauma and critical care centers.

RESULTS

The present study consisted of 104 patients, including 16 patients (15.4%) with delayed formation of SPA (7 patients with Grade II and 9 with Grade III) during their clinical course. SPA was diagnosed with enhanced CT at a mean (SD) of 4.6 (2.1) hospital days (range, 1-8 days) after admission. Delayed formation of SPA was found in 30.4% of Grade II injuries and in 18.4% of Grade III injuries. Eight patients with delayed formation of SPA were observed without transcatheter arterial embolization during their entire stay. These SPAs were spontaneously occluded on follow-up enhanced CT or angiography. Spontaneous occlusion of SPA was confirmed at 5.2 (2.6) hospital days (range, 2-10 days) after diagnosis of delayed SPA.

CONCLUSION

Delayed formation of SPAs was recognized with enhanced helical CT in 15% of all patients during hospital Days 1 to 8. About one half of the SPAs had occluded spontaneously without therapeutic intervention. Our results suggested that follow-up enhanced CT performed approximately 1 week after splenic injury may be useful to detect delayed SPA formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level III.

Embolization for pediatric blunt splenic injury is an alternative to splenectomy when observation fails

BACKGROUND

Management of splenic injury has shifted from operative to nonoperative management in both children and adults with reports of high success rates. Benefits of splenic conservation include decreased hospital stay, blood transfusion, and mortality, as well as avoidance of infectious complications. Angiography with embolization is an innovative adjunct to nonoperative management and has resulted in increased splenic salvage in adults; however, data in the pediatric population are scant.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of a single-hospital trauma registry reviewed from 1999 to 2009. Patients 18 years and younger admitted with injury to the spleen were included. Children with penetrating injury were excluded. Children were divided into three categories by initial treatment: observation, embolization, or splenectomy. Data recorded include age, radiographic grade of injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Groups were analyzed for success of initial treatment, requirement for transfusion of packed red blood cells, splenic salvage, and mortality.

RESULTS

Registry review identified 259 children with blunt splenic injury. Initial treatment was observation in 227, embolization in 15, and splenectomy in 17. In the observation group, 9 (4%) of 227 children failed initial treatment; 8 of these underwent embolization, while 1 unerwent splenectomy. In the embolization group, 1 (7%) of 15 failed initial treatment and underwent splenectomy. Blood transfusion was required by 38 (17%) of 227 in the observation group, 6 (40%) of 15 (p = 0.02) in the embolization group, and 15 (88%) of 17 (p < 0.01) in the splenectomy group. Overall splenic salvage rate was 237 (92%) of 259. Three children died in the observation group, and four children died in the splenectomy group. There was no death in the embolization group.

CONCLUSION

Splenic artery embolization for blunt trauma in children is associated with a higher blood transfusion rate compared with observation but offers a safe, intermediate alternative to splenectomy when observation fails.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review

Introduction

The goal of non-operative management (NOM) for blunt splenic trauma (BST) is to preserve the spleen. The advantages of NOM for minor splenic trauma have been extensively reported, whereas its value for the more severe splenic injuries is still debated. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available published evidence on NOM in patients with splenic trauma and to compare it with the operative management (OM) in terms of mortality, morbidity and duration of hospital stay.

Methods

For this systematic review we followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" statement. A systematic search was performed on PubMed for studies published from January 2000 to December 2011, without language restrictions, which compared NOM vs. OM for splenic trauma injuries and which at least 10 patients with BST.

Results

We identified 21 non randomized studies: 1 Clinical Controlled Trial and 20 retrospective cohort studies analyzing a total of 16,940 patients with BST. NOM represents the gold standard treatment for minor splenic trauma and is associated with decreased mortality in severe splenic trauma (4.78% vs. 13.5% in NOM and OM, respectively), according to the literature. Of note, in BST treated operatively, concurrent injuries accounted for the higher mortality. In addition, it was not possible to determine post-treatment morbidity in major splenic trauma. The definition of hemodynamic stability varied greatly in the literature depending on the surgeon and the trauma team, representing a further bias. Moreover, data on the remaining analyzed outcomes (hospital stay, number of blood transfusions, abdominal abscesses, overwhelming post-splenectomy infection) were not reported in all included studies or were not comparable, precluding the possibility to perform a meaningful cumulative analysis and comparison.

Conclusions

NOM of BST, preserving the spleen, is the treatment of choice for the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades I and II. Conclusions are more difficult to outline for higher grades of splenic injury, because of the substantial heterogeneity of expertise among different hospitals, and potentially inappropriate comparison groups.