Ibrutinib versus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a randomized, open-label phase 3 study

Network meta-analysis of novel targeted therapies for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Background

The recent development of new antileukemic therapies (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhbitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, and B-cell lymyphoma-2 antagonists) improved the progression-free survival (PFS) compared with selected standard regimens in clinical trials for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Unfortunately, the relative efficacy of all possible therapeutic options remains unknown because there is no direct evidence for all possible comparisons.

Objectives

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of novel agents, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Design

Systematic literature review with Bayesian NMA.

Methods

An extensive systematic literature review of randomized clinical trials for relapsed/refractory CLL was performed. We searched for articles indexed in medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library) and gray literature that could be further implemented into the Bayesian NMA.

Results

The systematic search identified 15 randomized trials that formed networks comparing PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rates, and serious adverse events. Our study showed that all regimens containing novel agents significantly prolonged PFS compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy. Among targeted drugs, venetoclax (VEN) + rituximab (RTX) had comparable efficacy in terms of PFS to zanubrutinib (ZAN) [hazard ratio (95% credible interval), 1.10 (0.59-2.08)], acalabrutinib (ACA) [0.78 (0.47-1.30)], ibrutinib (IBR) monotherapy [0.72 (0.41-1.27)], and other IBR-based regimens. ZAN was superior to IBR monotherapy [0.65 (0.49-0.86)] but not to ACA [0.71 (0.49-1.02)]. There were no significant differences in OS in any of the above comparisons.

Conclusion

All novel therapies have better efficacy than chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy regimens. Among novel agents, the relative efficacy of VEN + RTX was similar to all BTKi, while ZAN was superior to IBR and comparable to ACA.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42022304330.

Efficacy and safety of first- versus second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We conducted this first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the competitive advantage of 2nd-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) compared to 1st-generation BTKi in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The literature search was conducted from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase databases, and hematology annual conferences. Data of over response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted to a pool meta-analysis of efficacy; adverse events (AEs) were also extracted to a pool meta-analysis of safety. Bias risk assessment and meta-analysis were performed by Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 14 software. A total of 3649 patients from 29 cohorts were included. The results showed that the benefits of ORR and 24-month PFS in 2nd-generation BTKi compared to 1st-generation BTKi were not significant in the whole population but only in the relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL patient subgroup (ORR: 86.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.013; 24-month PFS: 76.9% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.004). Any-grade AEs were comparable between 1st- and 2nd-generation BTKi, but grade 3 or higher AEs were significantly less frequent with 2nd-generation BTKi versus 1st-generation BTKi (grade 3 or higher: 53.1% vs. 72.5%; p = 0.002). Headache was more frequent with 2nd-generation BTKi, while diarrhea and atrial fibrillation were more frequent with 1st-generation BTKi. Only for patients with relapsed or refractory CLL did 2nd-generation BTKi have a competitive advantage, while adverse effects still need to be considered. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, Identifier 42022342488.

Canadian evidence-based guideline for treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Following the recent publication of Canadian evidence-based guidelines for frontline treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the same group of clinicians developed guidelines for CLL in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. The treatment of R/R CLL has changed significantly in the past few years, with many novel therapeutics available to hematologists across the country. These guidelines aim to standardize the management of CLL in the relapsed/refractory setting, using the best evidence currently available.

Richter Transformation of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia-Are We Making Progress?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment paradigm of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has dramatically changed with the advent of novel targeted agents over the past decade. Richter transformation (RT), or the development of an aggressive lymphoma from a background of CLL, is a well-recognized complication of CLL and carries significantly poor clinical outcomes. Here, we provide an update on current diagnostics, prognostication, and contemporary treatment of RT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several genetic, biologic, and laboratory markers have been proposed as candidate risk factors for the development of RT. Although a diagnosis of RT is typically suspected based on clinical and laboratory findings, tissue biopsy is essential for histopathologic confirmation of diagnosis. The standard of care for RT treatment at this time remains chemoimmunotherapy with the goal of proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. Several newer treatment modalities are being studied for use in the management of RT, including small molecules, immunotherapy, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The management of patients with RT remains a challenge. Ongoing trials show enormous promise for newer classes of therapy in RT, with the hope being that these agents can synergize, and perhaps supersede, the current standard of care in the near future.

Impacts of early therapy response, interval to therapy interruption, and cumulative therapy interruption duration on outcome of ibrutinib therapy in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

To investigate the impact of early response and treatment interruption on the survival of patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (r/r CLL/SLL) treated with ibrutinib. This post hoc analysis used data of patients received ibrutinib treatment from an open-label, multicenter phase 3 study comparing ibrutinib with rituximab in patients with r/r CLL/SLL. The association of complete or partial response at 6 months, interruption within the first 6 months, cumulative interruption durations during the ibrutinib-treated period with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the adjusted Cox hazard proportional model. The study included 87 patients treated with ibrutinib, of which 74 patients had at least 6 months of ibrutinib treatment and were analyzed. The response at 6 months did not affect PFS (HR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.22-1.49) or OS (HR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.22-3.31). The onset of interruption before or after 6 months was not associated with PFS (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.34-2.30) or OS (HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.23-2.52). However, a cumulative interruption of more than 35 days was independently associated with worse PFS (HR = 2.4, 95%CI: 0.99-5.74) and OS (HR = 2.6, 95%CI: 0.88-7.44). Continuous interruption for more than 14 days was associated with a numerically lower 3-year PFS rate (> 14 vs. ≤ 14 days: 42% vs. 73%) and 3-year OS rate (> 14 vs. ≤ 14 days: 58% vs. 84%, both P > 0.05). Response status at 6 months or early therapy interruptions did not affect survival in patients with r/r CLL/SLL treated with ibrutinib. However, a cumulative temporary interruption of more than 35 days could potentially impact patient outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India

Background

Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of these drugs is from high-income countries, which has limited generalisability for low-income and middle-income counties. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens, chlorambucil plus prednisolone (CP), bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib for CLL treatment in India.

Methods

A Markov model was developed for estimating lifetime costs and consequences in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 CLL patients following treatment with different therapeutic regimens. The analysis was performed based on a limited societal perspective, 3% discount rate and lifetime horizon. The clinical effectiveness of each regime in the form of progression-free survival and occurrence of adverse events were assessed from various randomised controlled trials. A structured comprehensive review of literature was undertaken for the identification of relevant trials. The data on utility values and out of pocket expenditure was obtained from primary data collected from 242 CLL patients across six large cancer hospitals in India.

Findings

As compared to the most affordable regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy, none of the other therapeutic regimens were cost-effective at one time per capita gross-domestic product of India. However, if the current price of either combination of BR and ibrutinib or even ibrutinib alone could be reduced by more than 80%, regimen comprising of BR as first-line therapy followed by second-line ibrutinib would become cost-effective.

Interpretation

At the current market prices, regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy is the most cost-effective strategy for CLL treatment in India.

Funding

Department of Health Research, Government of India.

BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases: mechanisms and clinical studies

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is an essential component of multiple signaling pathways that regulate B cell and myeloid cell proliferation, survival, and functions, making it a promising therapeutic target for various B cell malignancies and inflammatory diseases. Five small molecule inhibitors have shown remarkable efficacy and have been approved to treat different types of hematological cancers, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, tirabrutinib, and orelabrutinib. The first-in-class agent, ibrutinib, has created a new era of chemotherapy-free treatment of B cell malignancies. Ibrutinib is so popular and became the fourth top-selling cancer drug worldwide in 2021. To reduce the off-target effects and overcome the acquired resistance of ibrutinib, significant efforts have been made in developing highly selective second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors and various combination approaches. Over the past few years, BTK inhibitors have also been repurposed for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Promising data have been obtained from preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. In this review, we summarized current progress in applying BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory disorders, highlighting available results from clinical studies.

Targeted therapies in CLL/SLL and the cumulative incidence of infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are prone to infections.

Aims: Provide a pooled estimate of the cumulative incidence for infections that fulfilled the criteria associated with severe infectious adverse events for grade 3 or higher (including pneumonia, febrile neutropenia and sepsis) in patients who receive targeted therapies.

Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that included patients with CLL/SLL who received targeted therapies and performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the cumulative incidence of infections.

Results: Of 2,914 studies screened, we retrieved 31 which evaluated 11,660 patients. The pooled cumulative incidence of infections for patients who received treatment regimens based on a BTK inhibitors was 19.86%. For patients who received treatment based on rituximab and second generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, the pooled cumulative incidence of infections was 19.85 and 13.46%, respectively. Regarding PI3K inhibitor-based regimens the cumulative incidence of severe infections was 30.89%. BCL-2 inhibitors had a cumulative incidence of infections of 17.49% while lenalidomide and alemtuzumab had an incidence of 13.33 and 45.09%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of pneumonia ranged from 3.01 to 8.45% while febrile neutropenia ranged from 2.68 to 10.80%. Regarding sepsis, the cumulative incidence ranged from 0.9 to 4.48%.

Conclusion: Patients with CLL/SLL who receive targeted therapies may develop severe infections at significant rates that, in addition to disease stage and other complications, depend on the mechanism of action of the used drug. Surveillance for infections and development of effective prophylactic strategies are critical for patients with CLL/SLL who receive targeted therapies.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://systematicreview.gov/], identifier [registration number]

The Safety of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in B-cell Malignancies: A Systematic Review

B-cell malignancies, most notably lymphomas, make up most of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the United States. There is limited randomized data comparing 1^st and 2^nd generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors. Our aim was to compare the safety profiles of 1^st versus 2^nd generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors. A systematic search was performed from database inception to January 13, 2020. Studies with Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of B-cell malignancies in the adult population (> 18 years old) were utilized and the adverse events were extracted. Fifty-five studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review with forty-one studies with 1^st generation and fourteen studies with 2^nd generation. The review included both clinical trials and retrospective studies with average time of follow-up of 2 years for the 1^st generation group and 18 months for the 2^nd generation group. We found that the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was significantly higher in the 1^st generation group (20.8%) as compared to the 2^nd generation group (6.3%). However, there was a higher incidence of hematologic/oncologic and gastrointestinal side effects in the 2^nd generation group compared to the 1^st (62.3% compared to 39.2% and 36.9% compare to 28.9%). The number of Grade 5 cardiovascular events (death) were same in the 1^st generation group compared to the 2^nd generation. Further research is needed to develop highly selective Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors to avoid unwanted adverse events by minimizing off-targets. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Risk of bleeding associated with BTK inhibitor monotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The risk of bleeding associated with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) monotherapy remains to be understood. This systematic review aims to evaluate BTKi monotherapy related bleeding risk.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched up to December 5, 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BTKi monotherapy with control drugs or placebo, or comparing different BTKi monotherapies. The risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

10 studies with 3139 patients were included. Ibrutinib (vs. control drugs or placebo) significantly increased the risk of overall bleeding and major bleeding (RR=2.22, 95% CI 1.80-2.75, P<0.00001; RR=1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.18, P=0.04, respectively). Acalabrutinib (vs. control drugs) had a significantly increased overall bleeding risk (RR=3.45, 95% CI 2.39-4.99, p<0.00001). A significant difference was found in overall bleeding between ibrutinib and acalabrutinib (RR=1.35, 95% CI 1.11-1.64, P=0.002). Compared to zanubrutinib, ibrutinib tended to increase the risk of major bleeding (RR=1.55, 95% CI 0.57-4.18, P=0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib (vs. control drugs or placebo) have a higher risk of bleeding and overall bleeding, respectively. Limited evidence suggests that ibrutinib (vs. acalabrutinib) significantly increases overall bleeding risk, but the differences are not observed in other comparisons.

Use of BTK Inhibitors in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL): A Practical Guidance

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has changed significantly since the development of oral Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. While chemoimmunotherapy was previously the standard of care for first-line treatment, BTK inhibitors have proven to be a highly effective and safe therapeutic option for CLL/SLL, and now constitute one of the preferred first-line options. Ibrutinib, the first approved covalent BTK inhibitor in CLL/SLL, has the most long-term data supporting its efficacy in CLL/SLL treatment although is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and hemorrhage adverse events due to off-target kinase inhibition. The second-generation covalent BTK inhibitors, including acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, are more selective to BTK with less off-target effects. Resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors may emerge over time due to mutations in BTK and downstream kinases. Novel non-covalent BTK inhibitors currently being studied are showing promising activities to overcome such resistance. In this review, we discuss the role of BTK inhibitors in treatment of CLL/SLL, review the data that led to approval of BTK inhibitors in CLL/SLL, outline the toxicity profile of each approved BTK inhibitor and management, and give practical guidance on how to select the most appropriate agent for treatment.

Ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The scope of dermatologic adverse events to ibrutinib has not been systematically described. We sought to determine the incidence and severity of ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities and provide management recommendations. We conducted a systematic literature search of clinical trials and cohorts investigating ibrutinib monotherapy for cancer or chronic graft-versus-host disease through June 2020. Thirty-two studies with 2258 patients were included. The incidence of all-grade toxicities included cutaneous bleeds (24.8%; 95%CI, 18.6-31.0%), mucocutaneous infections (4.9%; 95%CI, 2.9-7.0%), rash (10.8%; 95%CI. 6.1-15.5%), mucositis (6%; 95%CI, 3.6-8.5%), edema (15.9%; 95%CI, 11.1-20.6%), pruritus (4.0%; 95%CI, 0.0-7.9%), xerosis (9.2%; 95%CI, 5.5-13.0%), nail changes (17.8%; 95%CI, 4.1-31.5%), and hair changes (7.9%; 95%CI, 0.0-21.3%). The incidence of high-grade toxicities included mucocutaneous infection (1.3%; 95%CI, 0.5-2.2%), rash (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.2%), mucositis (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.3%), and edema (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.2%). It is imperative that clinicians familiarize themselves with ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities to learn how to manage them, prevent discontinuation, and improve patient outcomes.

Ibrutinib in Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Lower Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation

INTRODUCTION

Therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) with drugs such as ibrutinib and rituximab is often associated with immune suppression, opportunistic infections, and reactivation of virus infections such as hepatitis B virus (HBV). This risk is especially important in geographical regions like Asia where many potential therapy recipients have HBV infection. Also, whether safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in Asians and Europeans with advanced CLL/SLL are similar is unknown. We determined the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib compared with rituximab in advanced CLL/SLL including persons with HBV infection. We compared outcomes with data published from trials in persons of European descent.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, phase-3 trial (NCT01973387). Subjects with advanced CLL/SLL were randomized 2:1 to receive ibrutinib, 420 mg/day, or rituximab, 500 mg/mE + 2, for 6 cycles. Subjects with resolved HBV infection were included. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), survival, and adverse events including resolved HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

131 subjects received ibrutinib (N = 87) or rituximab (N = 44) including 53 with resolved HBV infection. Median follow-up was 31 months (95% confidence interval: 28, 32 months). ORR was 61% (50, 71%) versus 7% (2, 18%; p < 0.001). Median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib cohort but must be >40 months versus 8 months (7, 9 months; p < 0.0001) in the rituximab cohort. Median survival was not reached but must be >40 months versus 27 months (17 months, NE; p = 0.0006). In multivariable analyses, receiving ibrutinib increased PFS (hazard rate [HR] for failure = 0.12 [0.06, 0.23]; p < 0.001) and decreased risk of death (HR = 0.31 [0.15, 0.63]; p < 0.001). Median duration of exposure to ibrutinib was significantly longer than exposure to rituximab (28 vs. 5 months). The safety profile of ibrutinib was consistent with that observed in previous studies with no new safety signal. No subject receiving ibrutinib had HBV reactivation versus 2 receiving rituximab, despite much greater use of drugs to prevent HBV reactivation in the rituximab cohort. Outcomes were like those reported in persons of European descent, except ORR which, was unreliably correlated with PFS in Asians.

CONCLUSION

Ibrutinib is safe and effective in persons with advanced CLL/SLL and better than rituximab in all therapy outcomes including risk of HBV reactivation. Outcomes with ibrutinib in Chinese were like those reported in persons of predominately European descent.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: More Than Just Atrial Fibrillation

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the epidemiology, mechanisms, and management of cardiovascular complications of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKIs).

Recent Findings

Ibrutinib increases the risk of atrial fibrillation, bleeding, and hypertension compared with non-BTKI therapies. The evidence to support an association between ibrutinib and other cardiovascular complications including ventricular tachyarrhythmias or cardiomyopathy is limited. Ibrutinib metabolism can be inhibited by some medications used to treat cardiovascular complications. The cardiovascular effects of more selective BTKIs, such as acalabrutinib, remain to be determined.

Summary

Future research should address the mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular complications of BTKIs and how best to manage them. The risks and benefits of more selective BTKIs as compared with ibrutinib require further evaluation.

Venetoclax alone or in combination with other regimens treatment achieve deep and sustained remission of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis

Recently, the use of novel targeted drugs significantly improved the overall response rate (ORR) and survival of patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL). The treatment of R/R CLL has been gradually developed from traditional chemotherapy to targeted therapy. Venetoclax has been proved to be effective for R/R CLL as a single agent or in combination with various regimens. However, the data from clinical studies were still limited, especially since a large number of studies were single arms. Considering that there were few kinds of research in this regard and the data were not uniform, a meta-analysis was conducted to describe ORR and undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) of venetoclax in patients with R/R CLL. The pooled cumulative prevalence of total ORR was 82% (95% CI 77-87%), and the pooled ORR in venetoclax + anti-CD20 antibody-based group was 89% (95% CI 83-94%). There were significant differences among venetoclax monotherapy group, venetoclax + ibrutinib group and venetoclax + anti-CD20 group with pooled uMRD of 39% (95% CI 31-47%), 57% (95% CI 50-64%) and 43% (95% CI 19-70%), respectively (P = 0.004 < 0.05). Pooled ORR of patients with high-risk cytogenetic in venetoclax monotherapy group was 73% (95% CI 61-83%). No significant difference was observed in comparison with patients without high-risk cytogenetic who received the same treatment (P = 0.518). Our research results indicate that venetoclax combined with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody may be an effective treatment for patients with R/R CLL, especially for CLL patients with high-risk cytogenetic factors. Furthermore, ibrutinib in combination with venetoclax showed a longer remission time, the deeper remission degree and uMRD-negative rate gradually increased with the extension of the treatment time.

Revisiting Richter transformation in the era of novel CLL agents

Richter transformation (RT) is the development of aggressive lymphoma - most frequently diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and rarely Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) - arising on the background of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Despite recent advances in CLL treatment, RT also develops in patients on novel agents, usually occurring as an early event. RT incidence is lower in CLL patients treated with novel agents in the front line compared to relapsed/refractory cases, with a higher incidence in patients with TP53 disruption. The genetic heterogeneity and complexity are higher in RT-DLBCL than CLL; the genetics of RT-HL are largely unknown. In addition to TP53, aberrations in CDKN2A, MYC, and NOTCH1 are common in RT-DLBCL; however, no distinct RT-specific genetic aberration is recognised yet. RT-DLBCL on ibrutinib is frequently associated with BTK and PLCG2 mutations. Here, we update on genetic analysis, diagnostics and treatment options in RT in the era of novel agents.

A phase Ib, open label, dose escalation trial of the anti-CD37 monoclonal antibody, BI 836826, in combination with ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BI 836826 is a chimeric immunoglobulin G1 antibody targeting CD37, a transmembrane protein expressed on normal and malignant B cells. This open-label, phase Ib, dose-escalation study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of BI 836826 + ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Eligible patients received 420 mg/day of ibrutinib with escalating doses of BI 836826. BI 836826 was administered in 4-week cycles. After Cycle 12, patients achieving complete response (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery, or minimal residual disease-negative partial response could continue to receive BI 836826 + ibrutinib every 4 weeks for ≤ 12 additional cycles. Patients received either 100 mg (n = 3) or 200 mg (n = 3) BI 836826 + ibrutinib. In the 100 mg BI 836826 cohort, one patient received two cycles and two patients received 22 cycles of BI 836826. In the 200 mg BI 836826 cohort, patients received 12, 16 and 20 cycles of BI 836826, respectively. All patients discontinued BI 836826 and continued ibrutinib outside the trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) evaluation period. As the trial was discontinued before the MTD was reached, the RP2D was not determined. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were predominantly hematological. Pseudomonal bacteremia was the only drug-related AE of special interest. BI 836826 + ibrutinib did not exceed the MTD at doses up to 200 mg in patients with CLL. However, RP2D and MTD were not formally established, as the sponsor discontinued the trial.

Risk of Bleeding Associated With Ibrutinib in Patients With B-Cell Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Ibrutinib is an oral covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia and some other B-cell malignancies. Some studies have found an increased risk of bleeding with ibrutinib. Some studies, however, found no significant differences in the risk of major bleeding between patients treated with ibrutinib and those with other regimens. So, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to estimate the risk of bleeding associated with ibrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies. Methods: A systematic search of PUBMED, EMBASE, Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted from January 2000 to February 2020 to identify RCTs by comparing ibrutinib with other agents or placebo in B-cell malignancies. The RevMan software (version 5.3) was used to carry out this analysis, and the analyzed data were represented by risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: There were 11 eligible RCTs (4,288 patients). All studies reported major bleeding, and seven studies reported overall bleeding (any-grade bleeding). Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding (overall bleeding and major bleeding) in patients with B-cell malignancies [RR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.68-3.90, p < 0.0001 and RR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.36-3.16, p = 0.0006, respectively]. The bleeding (overall bleeding and major bleeding) risk in patients with CLL was more obvious [RR = 3.08, 95% CI 2.07-4.58, p < 0.00001 and RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.37-4.41, p = 0.003, respectively]. There were no statistically significant differences for risk of bleeding between the subgroups based on dose and treatment setting. Conclusion: Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding (both overall bleeding and major bleeding) in patients with B-cell malignancies, especially in CLL.

B cell signalling pathways-New targets for precision medicine in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

The B cell receptor (BCR) is a master regulator of B cells, controlling cellular processes such as proliferation, migration and survival. Cell signalling downstream of the BCR is aberrantly activated in the B cell malignancy chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), supporting the pathophysiology of the disease. This insight has led to development and approval of small molecule inhibitors that target components of the BCR pathway. These advances have greatly improved the management of CLL, but the disease remains incurable. This may partly be explained by the inter-patient heterogeneity of the disease, also when it comes to treatment responses. Precision medicine is therefore required to optimize treatment and move towards a cure. Here, we discuss how the introduction of BCR signalling inhibitors has facilitated the development of functional in vitro assays to guide clinical treatment decisions on use of the same therapeutic agents in individual patients. The cellular responses to these agents can be analysed in high-throughput assays such as dynamic BH3 profiling, phospho flow experiments and drug sensitivity screens to identify predictive biomarkers. This progress exemplifies the positive synergy between basal and translational research needed to optimize patient care.

Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6

Ibrutinib may inhibit intestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B‐cell malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 μg) and bupropion/midazolam (75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single‐dose ibrutinib plus single‐dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady‐state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed‐effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%‐125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady‐state, the C_max and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6, as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion.

[Ibrutinib treatment for 2 cases of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia: a pilot study]

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) . Methods: Two cases of primary AIHA with relapse events were refractory to glucocorticoid, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, immunosuppressive drugs, and splenectomy (case 1 only) . Ibrutinib treatment was administered at an initial dose of 280 mg/d (420 mg/d for case 1 from the 3rd to 8th week) . Results: Both patients achieved transfusion independence and HGB>20 g/L above baseline after 2 weeks (partial response) . For case 1, HGB concentration restored to 113 g/L but with incomplete hemolysis recovery after 10 weeks; HGB reached the level of 118 g/L, also with incomplete hemolysis recovery, after 6 weeks in case 2. They all acquired complete response with incomplete hemolysis recovery (CRi) . The responses sustained 14 weeks and 10 weeks after follow-up at 16 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively. During the treatment, hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity is mild and acceptable. Conclusion: Ibrutinib alone is effective for the 2 R/R primary AIHA cases. We need further clinical trial to identify its efficacy and safety.

Treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma with the BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib: phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study

Background

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have demonstrated a high degree of efficacy in the treatment of B cell malignancies characterized by constitutive B cell receptor activation, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).

Methods

The efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib, an investigational highly selective BTK inhibitor, was evaluated in this single-arm, phase 2 study of Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. The primary endpoint was overall response rate as assessed by an independent review committee.

Results

Of the 91 evaluable patients, 77 (84.6%) achieved a response, with three (3.3%), 54 (59.3%), and 20 (22%) patients achieving a complete response, partial response, and partial response with lymphocytosis, respectively, after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. The estimated 12-month event-free rate for duration of response was 92.9%. The most commonly reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (44%), thrombocytopenia (15.4%), lung infection/pneumonia (13.2%), upper respiratory tract infection (9.9%), and anemia (8.8%). The 12-month overall survival rate was 96%. Eight (9.0%) patients discontinued zanubrutinib due to AEs, and seven (8.0%) patients required at least one dose reduction.

Conclusion

Treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL with zanubrutinib was generally well tolerated and resulted in a high overall response rate, thereby conferring a favorable benefit-risk profile.

Trial registration

Prospectively registered in China public registry (CTR20160890) on December 7, 2016: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/. Retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03206918) on July 2, 2017.

Risk of Infection Associated With Ibrutinib in Patients With B-Cell Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

B-cell malignancies confer an increased risk of infection due to associated immune defects. Conflicting evidence exists on the risk of infection in patients receiving ibrutinib. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate relative risk of infection with ibrutinib in B-cell malignancies.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, European Union Clinical Trials Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed through January 15, 2019, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing ibrutinib with other agents or placebo in B-cell malignancies. We pooled point estimates using the Der Simonian and Laird random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed by Stata/SE 15.1.

RESULTS

Seven studies randomizing 2167 patients were included in the final analysis. Treatment duration in studies ranged from 9.4 to 38.7 months. Ibrutinib was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (any grade and grade 3-5) in patients with B-cell malignancies [pooled risk ratio (RR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.69, P = .015; and RR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.05-1.74, P = .018, respectively]. In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, a significantly increased risk of grade 3-5 infection was noted in the ibrutinib group [pooled RR = 1.24, 95% CI, 1.02-1.50, P = .028]. Incidences of pneumonia and upper respiratory tract infection were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis found that ibrutinib was associated with significantly higher risk of infections in patients with B-cell malignancies. Occurrence of major individual subtypes was not different between groups, possibly as a result of inconsistent reporting across studies.

Treatment Outcomes of Novel Targeted Agents in Relapse/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Most chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients experience a relapse or become refractory to treatment with conventional chemotherapeutic agents. The network meta-analysis assesses the relative efficacy of novel targeted agents for the treatment of a relapse or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. A systematic literature search included seven phase III randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2512 patients treated with nine regimens. Data were extracted and evidence synthesized using network meta-analysis. All novel targeted therapies were significantly more effective than ofatumumab and demonstrated promising prolongation of progression free survival (PFS), with a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.10 to 0.52. Two novel targeted agent regimens, venetoclax plus rituximab and ibrutinib monotherapy, resulted in greater overall survival (HR, 0.335 and 0.361, respectively). Venetoclax plus rituximab and ibrutinib monotherapy were most favorable based on (1) HR for PFS compared with ofatumumab (Ibrutinib: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.07-0.14; Venetoclax plus rituximab: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.21) and SUCRA value (probability of being best) (Ibrutinib SUCRA, 0.92; Venetoclax rituximab SUCRA, 0.90) (2) HR for overall survival compared with ofatumumab (Ibrutinib: HR, 0.361; 95% CI, 0.208-0.627; Venetoclax rituximab: HR, 0.335; 95% CI, 0.112-0.997) and SUCRA value (Ibrutinib SUCRA, 0.84; Venetoclax rituximab SUCRA, 0.85) Both treatments reduced the risk of progression or death by 90% versus conventional ofatumumab. Both ibrutinib monotherapy and venetoclax rituximab have a high probability of being the most effective treatments for a relapse or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with respect to long-term progression-free survival and overall survival.

Infection control in patients treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with ibrutinib or idelalisib: recommendations from Italian society of hematology

The introduction of new therapeutic agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including the new kinase inhibitors (KIs) ibrutinib and idelalisib, has changed the therapeutic landscape of the disease. The new KIs have also changed frequency and epidemiology of infections, that represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality of the disease. Hence, the great strides in the indications and use of new KIs need parallel amelioration of prophylaxis and supportive treatment for infections. Moving from the recognition that infection control represents an unmet need, the Italian Society of Hematology (SIE) convened a panel of experts who had published and/or expressed an interest in infection complications in CLL. The goal of the project was to provide practice recommendations for the management of the infectious complications of CLL during ibrutinib or idelalisib therapy. The present publication represents the results of a series of email correspondences and meetings held during 2017 and 2018. Three domains of infectious complications during KIs therapy for CLL were explored: risk assessment, risk management and risk monitoring. We hope these recommendations will help to minimize infectious adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better outcomes, and better quality of life.

Efficacy of Ibrutinib-Based Regimen in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review

Ibrutinib has shown to have better efficacy than standard chemoimmunotherapy in del17 positive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients; however its role in del17 negative patients is less clear. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib-based regimens in CLL. Seven databases were searched in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines using the following keywords: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, and PCI-32765. Data from only prospective clinical trials was included. In a phase 3 trial (n = 136), the overall response rate (ORR) with ibrutinib was 92% whereas 18% patients had a complete response (CR). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 89% and 95% respectively. Phase 3 trial (n = 195) with single agent ibrutinib showed ORR of 63%. PFS at 6 months and OS at 12 months were 88% and 90% respectively. In a phase 2 trial of relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) or high risk treatment naive (TN) patients, combination of ibrutinib and rituximab (n = 104) achieved an ORR of 100% (CR 28%) as compared to ORR 98% (CR 21%) with ibrutinib monotherapy (n = 102) with no significant difference in PFS. Combination of ibrutinib and ublituximab (n = 64) had an ORR of 78% (CR 7%) in a phase 3 study. In del17p negative R/R patients, combination of bendamustine/rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib (n = 289) achieved an ORR of 83% (CR/CRi 10%) and the 18 month PFS was 79%. In a phase 2 trial treated with ibrutinib (n = 145), patients with del17p R/R disease achieved an ORR of 64% and the 24 month PFS and OS was 63% and 75% respectively. In TN del17p patients (n = 35), ORR was 97% (CR-0) and the 24 month PFS and OS were 82% and 84% respectively with single agent ibrutinib. Ibrutinib is the treatment of choice for patients with del17p mutation and has good efficacy in RR/TN patients without del17p mutation. Ibrutinib is being evaluated in combination with rituximab for del17p mutations. Future prospects include combination of ibrutinib with frontline chemotherapy and other novel agents for TN and RR del17p negative patients.

Ibrutinib increases the risk of hypertension and atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Ibrutinib is an oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenstrӧm’s macroglobulinemia. Ibrutinib has an increased risk of atrial fibrillation but the mechanism is unknown, and hypertension may play a role in the pathogenesis of this adverse drug reaction.

Methods

We aimed to review the risk of hypertension and atrial fibrillation as adverse events associated with ibrutinib through a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved in December 2018 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov. The data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses using the risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The confidence on the pooled estimates was ascertained through the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

There were 8 eligible RCTs (2580 patients), all reporting safety data of interest. Ibrutinib was associated with a significant increase in the risk of hypertension with a RR of 2.82 (95%CI 1.52–5.23) with moderate quality evidence. Ibrutinib increased significantly the risk of atrial fibrillation with a RR of 4.69 (95%CI 2.17–7.64) with high quality evidence.

Conclusions

Ibrutinib was associated with significantly increased risks of both hypertension and atrial fibrillation.

The magnitude of improvement in progression-free survival with targeted therapy in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia based on prognostic risk category: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) guidelines highlight the relevance of cytogenetic and molecular testing to identify patients with high-risk genetic features. However, at the moment, only 17p del/TP53 mutation are universally recognized parameters influencing choice of therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the magnitude of improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with B-cell receptor (BCR) (i.e. ibrutinib and idelalisib) or BCL2 (i.e. venetoclax) pathway inhibitors based on the presence or absence of 17p deletion/TP53 mutations, 11q deletion and IGHV mutational status in relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL patients. Meta-analysis of seven randomized trials comprising 2409 patients with R/R CLL revealed that improvement over traditional treatments observed with BCR or BCL2 pathway inhibitors is common to all patients, including those patients with unfavorable and favorable prognostic parameters. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the choice of therapy in R/R CLL not solely on the basis of 17p del/TP53 mutations.