1
|
Siech C, de Angelis M, Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Puliatti S, Longo N, Briganti A, Banek S, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Adult Prostate Sarcoma: Demographics, Treatment Patterns, and Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-16258-w. [PMID: 39313727 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16258-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to examine clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival rates in a contemporary population-based cohort of adult prostate sarcoma patients. METHODS In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), adult patients with prostate sarcoma were identified. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, smoothed cumulative incidence plots, and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS Of 125 patients, 45 (36%) harbored leiomyosarcoma, 17 (14%) had rhabdomyosarcoma, 15 (12%) had stromal sarcoma, 17 (14%) had sarcoma not otherwise specified (NOS), and 31 (25%) had other sarcoma subtypes. Metastatic stage was most common in the rhabdomyosarcoma patients (44%) and least common in the leiomyosarcoma (21%) and stromal sarcoma (20%) patients. Most of the rhabdomyosarcoma patients received the combination of systemic and radiation therapy with (24%) or without radical surgery (35%), whereas most of the leiomyosarcoma and stromal sarcoma patients underwent radical surgery with (22 and 13%) or without (22 and 47%) radiation. In the overall population, the median overall survival was 27 months. The 5-years overall versus cancer-specific versus other-cause mortality rates were respectively 71 versus 58 versus 13%. In the multivariable Cox regression models, the highest overall mortality was exhibited by the patients with metastatic disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-5.31; p < 0.001) or unknown disease stage (HR 2.94; 95% CI 2.20-7.21; p = 0.019). Conversely, of all the histologic subtypes, only stromal sarcoma distinguished itself by lower overall mortality (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.96; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS Four major histologic subtypes were identified. Among most adult sarcoma patients, treatment patterns vary according to histology, from multimodal therapy to radical prostatectomy alone. These treatment differences reflect equally important heterogeneity in survival patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neuroscience, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Séverine Banek
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Danakh A, Safi M, Al-Radhi M, Zhu X, Yang D. Surgery improve overall and cancer-specific survival of rare urinary cancers; population - Based study. Surg Oncol 2022; 44:101807. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
3
|
Marvaso G, Ciardo D, Gandini S, Riva G, Frigo E, Volpe S, Fodor C, Zerini D, Rojas DP, Comi S, Cambria R, Cattani F, Musi G, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Comparison of Outcomes and Toxicity Between Extreme and Moderate Radiation Therapy Hypofractionation in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:735-744. [PMID: 31377161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare clinical outcomes and toxicities of 2 radiation therapy (RT) schemes for localized prostate cancer (PCa): extreme hypofractionation (EH; fractions of 6.5-7 Gy to a total dose of 32.5-35 Gy) and the moderate hypofractionation (MH; 26 fractions of 2.7 Gy to a total dose of 70.2 Gy). A propensity score method was used to compare the EH-RT and MH-RT groups. METHODS AND MATERIALS Our analysis included a total of 421 patients divided in 2 groups: 227 treated with MH-RT and 194 treated with EH-RT (43 and 30 months median follow-up, respectively). Propensity matching created comparable cohorts. Statistical evaluations were performed on the whole cohort, stratifying the analyses by risk strata factors identified with the propensity scores, and on a subgroup of patients matched by propensity score. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox models were used to compare the 2 groups, mainly for gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity and secondarily for clinical progression-free survival, biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Considering the whole population, acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal greater than grade 1 was significantly more frequent in the whole MH-RT group (P < .001 and P < .002, respectively). A borderline significantly greater late genitourinary was confirmed with the multivariate analysis (P = .07). Concerning tumor outcome, no statistically significant differences were observed. After propensity score matching, 226 patients were included in the analysis. The 2 obtained propensity score matched groups did not differ for any of the clinical and pathologic variables considered for the analysis, resulting in well-balanced cohorts. The results obtained on the whole population were confirmed in the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS EH-RT yields a decreased risk of acute or late toxicities compared with MH-RT, and oncologic outcomes were comparable. Our data indicate that EH-RT might be considered as a treatment modality of choice for select patients with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Frigo
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Cambria
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Amer KM, Thomson JE, Congiusta D, Dobitsch A, Chaudhry A, Li M, Chaudhry A, Bozzo A, Siracuse B, Aytekin MN, Ghert M, Beebe KS. Epidemiology, Incidence, and Survival of Rhabdomyosarcoma Subtypes: SEER and ICES Database Analysis. J Orthop Res 2019; 37:2226-2230. [PMID: 31161653 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents and accounts for 3% of all pediatric tumors. Subtypes include alveolar, spindle cell, embryonal, mixed-type, pleomorphic, and rhabdomyosarcoma with ganglionic differentiation. The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for patients diagnosed with any type of rhabdomyosarcoma between 1973 and 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and incidence were studied with χ2 analysis. Survival was modeled with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of age and gender on survival. Pleomorphic subtype had higher grade and larger sized tumors compared to other subtypes (p < 0.05). Pleomorphic and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma had the worst overall survival with a 26.6% and 28.9% 5-year survival, respectively. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma had the highest 5-year survival rate (73.9%). Tumor size was negatively correlated with survival months, indicating patients with larger tumors had shorter survival times (p < 0.05). Presence of higher-grade tumors and metastatic disease at presentation were negatively correlated with survival months (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the survival were found between gender or race between all of the subtypes (p > 0.05). This study highlights key differences in the demographic and survival rates of the different types of rhabdomyosarcoma that can be used for more tailored patient counseling. We also demonstrate that large, population-level databases provide sufficient data that can be used in the analysis of rare tumors. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2226-2230, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil M Amer
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| | | | - Dominick Congiusta
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| | - Andrew Dobitsch
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| | - Ahmed Chaudhry
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| | - Matthew Li
- Department of Education, Lime Tree Bay Ave, West Bay, Cayman Islands
| | - Aisha Chaudhry
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| | - Anthony Bozzo
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brianna Siracuse
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| | - Mahmut Nedim Aytekin
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Michelle Ghert
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen S Beebe
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite D, Newark, New Jersey, 07103
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tward JD, Poppe MM, Hitchcock YJ, O'Neil B, Albertson DJ, Shrieve DC. Demographics, stage distribution, and relative roles of surgery and radiotherapy on survival of persons with primary prostate sarcomas. Cancer Med 2018; 7:6030-6039. [PMID: 30453392 PMCID: PMC6308088 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary prostate sarcomas (PPS) are rare. Outcomes for this cancer have not been well characterized. Materials and Methods Subjects with a PPS diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified in the SEER database. Subjects were stratified by disease stage and types of therapies received. Disease‐specific survival (DSS) and Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan‐Meier analysis and cohorts were compared with a univariate and multivariable Cox regression. Results The incidence of PPS among all prostate cancer diagnoses was 0.02%. Subjects younger than age 26 years at diagnosis represented 29% of cases, and 32% of primary prostate sarcomas were rhabdomyosarcoma histology. Rhabdomyosarcoma Histologies The median age at diagnosis was 9 years. Between age 0‐25 years rhabdomyosarcoma accounted for 96.4% of primary prostate sarcoma diagnoses, after age 25 rhabdomyosarcoma represented 15% of new diagnoses. The 10‐year DSS and OS for rhabdomyosarcoma was 47% and 44%. Non‐Rhabdomyosarcoma Histologies The median age at diagnosis was 71 years. The most common diagnoses were leiomyosarcoma (33%) and carcinosarcoma (28%). Localized, regional, or distant disease occurred in 40%, 34%, and 26% of cases. The 10‐year DSS and OS were 26% and 14%. In locally advanced cases, RT added to surgery trended toward improved DSS (P = 0.10). Conclusions Disease‐specific survival and OS for non‐rhabdomyosarcoma histologies appear inferior to those of rhabdomyosarcoma. The addition of RT to surgical resection may improve DSS in locally advanced non‐rhabdomyosarcoma. This is the largest report of the incidence, stage distribution, and survival for this extremely rare urologic malignancy providing valuable prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ying J Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Daniel J Albertson
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|