Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-Multicenter analysis

Blood pressure elevations post-lenvatinib treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a potential marker for better prognosis

Lenvatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that effectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor signaling and is used for treating hepatocellular carcinoma. However, angiogenesis inhibitors often cause hypertension. Although lenvatinib-induced hypertension has been proposed as a potential surrogate marker for better prognosis, studies on blood pressure elevations and outcomes following lenvatinib initiation are limited. This study included 67 patients who underwent lenvatinib therapy at the Department of Gastroenterology, Kagoshima University Hospital, between May 2018 and December 2023. The median age of the cohort was 71 years, and 82.1% of the patients were male. The median blood pressure at admission was 128/73 mmHg, which significantly increased to 136/76 mmHg the day after lenvatinib administration. Grade 3 hypertension (≥160/100 mmHg) occurred in 37.3% of patients during hospitalization. The median increase in systolic blood pressure from admission to its peak during hospitalization was 26 mmHg. Patients who experienced an increase in blood pressure of ≥26 mmHg were classified into the blood pressure elevation group, which showed a significantly lower mortality rate than that of the blood pressure non-elevation group (35.3% vs. 81.8%, log-rank p = 0.007), even after adjusting for age, sex, disease stage, performance status, and liver reserve function. This study demonstrated that patients who experienced earlier blood pressure elevation after lenvatinib administration had lower overall mortality rates. These findings suggest that blood pressure elevations after lenvatinib initiation may serve as valuable prognostic indicators in patients with cancer undergoing lenvatinib therapy. • Early Blood Pressure Elevation Following Lenvatinib Administration Significant blood pressure elevation was observed from the day after Lenvatinib administration, with a median systolic blood pressure increase of 26 mmHg. Grade 3 hypertension (≥160/100 mmHg) was observed in 38% of patients during hospitalization. •Blood Pressure Control Antihypertensive therapy was intensified in 39% of patients during hospitalization, yet 12% still had Grade 3 hypertension the day before discharge. • Association Between Blood Pressure Elevation and Prognosis Even after adjusting for age, sex, disease stage, performance status, and liver function reserve, blood pressure elevation was suggested as a better prognostic factor.

Risk factors for lenvatinib-induced hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

AIMS

Lenvatinib mesylate (LEN) is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat various cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LEN therapy for HCC is associated with a high incidence of adverse events, including hypertension (HTN). However, the risk factors associated with LEN therapy remain unclear. This study investigated the incidence of LEN-induced HTN (LENiHTN), and the relationship between HTN incidence and patient demographics in patients with HCC receiving LEN therapy.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, retrospective study of patients with HCC who received LEN therapy between 19 April 2018 and 30 September 2020. The observation period was from 1 week before the start to 1 month after the end of LEN administration.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with HCC were enrolled. Any grade LENiHTN was found in 74.7% of patients. Among patients with LENiHTN, the use of 2 or more antihypertensive agents before starting LEN was less common (P = .007); serum potassium (K) and albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) were lower (P = .013 and 0.038, respectively); and albumin (Alb) was higher (P = .025). The cut-off values of K, Alb and ALBI for HTN were estimated at 4.1 mEq L-1, 3.1 g dL-1 and -1.736, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, low K (adjusted HR: 2.078) and low ALBI (adjusted HR: 2.845) were independent risk factors for LENiHTN.

CONCLUSION

Low K, high Alb and low ALBI were independent risk factors for LENiHTN. Systematic evaluation of HTN risk and early intervention for HTN prevention among high-risk patients can markedly enhance LEN therapy efficacy and use.

Long-Term Survival of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib in Real-World Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The real-world survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with lenvatinib has been explored retrospectively with a small sample size. We conducted a prospective observational 2-year extension study (510 study) of a 1-year observational post-marketing study of lenvatinib (504 study) to evaluate the long-term overall survival (OS) of patients with uHCC treated with lenvatinib and associated factors with a large sample size.

METHODS

Patients with uHCC included (July 2018 to January 2019) in the 504 study and who consented were eligible for the 510 study and were followed for up to 3 years after lenvatinib treatment initiation. Using the data from the 504 study and 510 study of the 504 study analysis set, we estimated the OS, the time from the first lenvatinib dose to all-cause death by the Kaplan-Meier method (ClinicalTrials.Gov Registration ID, 504 study: NCT03663114; 510 study: NCT04008082).

RESULTS

The 703 patients included in the analysis were followed for a median period (min, max) of 12.5 months (0.1, 44.8). The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 16.6 months (15.4, 18.5). OS was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with bile duct invasion (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.621), portal vein invasion (HR: 1.365), ≥ 4 intrahepatic lesions (HR: 1.437), extrahepatic lesions (HR: 1.357), Child-Pugh B/C (HR: 1.515), mALBI Grade 2a (HR: 1.331), and Grade ≥ 2b (HR: 1.811).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale, prospective, real-world study demonstrated a long OS, comparable to that reported in the global Phase III REFLECT trial. More advanced-stage tumors and worse hepatic function have been suggested as OS-associated factors, consistent with previous reports.

Geriatric nutritional risk index and newly developed scoring system as prognosis prediction for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib

In the current era of immune therapy, lenvatinib (LEN) continues to be vital for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients. This study investigates the importance of nutritional status in the prognosis of uHCC patients receiving LEN and evaluates a new prognostic scoring system that combines the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and systemic inflammatory response. From 2018 to 2022, 484 uHCC patients treated with LEN (384 males, median age 73). Prognostic value was compared between GNRI and C-reactive protein (CRP) scoring (GNRI-C score), GNRI, and neo-Glasgow prognostic score (neo-GPS). Evaluation was based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and concordance index(c-index). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.3/6.8/4.6 months for GNRI no-risk/low-risk/moderate-to-major risk (p < 0.01, AIC 4742.4/c-index 0.585). Median overall survival (mOS) was 27.8/15.2/9.5 months (p < 0.01, AIC 3433.34/c-index 0.639). For GNRI-C score, mPFS was 10.8/7.1/5.6/4.0 months (score 0/1/2/3) (p < 0.01, AIC 4732.82/c-index 0.6), while neo-GPS showed mPFS of 8.5/5.1/5.2 months (p < 0.01, AIC 4745.89/c-index 0.562). For mOS, GNRI-C score demonstrated 28.6/20.0/10.1/8.4 months (score 0/1/2/3) (p < 0.01, AIC 3420.27/c-index 0.652), while neo-GPS indicated 21.0/12.4/4.5 months (p < 0.01, AIC 3468.84/c-index 0.564). The newly devised GNRI-C score, incorporating nutritional and inflammatory markers, could offer improved prognostic predictions for uHCC patients treated with LEN.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus Sorafenib versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus Lenvatinib for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have highlighted that TACE in conjunction with Lenvatinib (TACE-L) offers a promising adjunct therapy for advanced HCC patients, outperforming TACE plus Sorafenib (TACE-S). However, there has been a lack of research comparing these two regimens for intermediate HCC.

AIMS

This study aims to address the research gap by evaluating the efficacy of TACE-L versus TACE-S in intermediate HCC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of consecutive intermediate HCC patients who received either TACE-L or TACE-S from November 2018 to December 2022. Portal vein width was assessed using abdominal NMRI or Doppler ultrasonography, and inflammatory markers were derived from routine blood counts. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

RESULTS

The study included 117 patients, with 56 in the TACE-S group and 61 in the TACE-L group. The TACE-S group demonstrated superior OS (HR = 1.704, 95% CI: 1.012-2.870, p = 0.045) compared to the TACE-L group. No significant difference was observed in PFS (HR:1.512, 95% CI: 0.988-2.313, p = 0.057) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that male patients, those with cirrhosis, and those with more than four tumors had better OS and PFS in the TACE-S group than in the TACE-L group. Inflammatory markers were comparable between the groups. The TACE-S group experienced a higher incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPE) (14/56 [25%] vs. 5/61 [8.1%], p = 0.014) but a lower incidence of hypertension (3/56 [5.3%] vs. 11/61 [18%], p = 0.035) compared to the TACE-L group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with intermediate HCC, TACE-S was found to be more effective in terms of OS than TACE-L. No significant disparity was noted in PFS between the two treatment groups.

Risk factors for lenvatinib-induced palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

AIM

Lenvatinib mesylate (LEN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat various cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC treatment with LEN is associated with a very high incidence of adverse events. This study was aimed at investigating the incidence of LEN-induced palmar-planter erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) and its relationship with patient demographics by analyzing clinical laboratory data of LEN-treated patients with HCC.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, retrospective study of patients with HCC who received LEN between April 19, 2018, and September 30, 2020. The observation period was from 1 week before the start of LEN administration to 1 month after the end of administration.

RESULTS

Overall, 75 patients with HCC were enrolled. LEN-induced PPES was found in 48.0% (36/75 patients). In these patients, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and monocytes (MONO) were significantly high (ALP: p = 1.32 × 10-3, γ-GTP: p = 4.25 × 10-3 and MONO: p = 0.013). The cut off values of ALP, γ-GTP and MONO for LEN-induced PPES were estimated at 573 U/L, 89 U/L, and 310 counts/μL, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, γ-GTP and MONO were independent risk factors for LEN-induced PPES.

CONCLUSIONS

High γ-GTP and high MONO were risk factors for LEN-induced PPES.

Comparative analysis of the therapeutic outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma patients aged 80 years and older: Multicenter study

AIM

Elderly patients are believed to have a reduced immune capacity, which may make immunotherapy less effective. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic outcome of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and lenvatinib (LEN) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients aged 80 years and older.

METHODS

From March 2018 to July 2022, 170 and 92 elderly patients who received LEN and Atez/Bev as first-line treatment, respectively, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The median ages of the Atez/Bev and LEN groups were 83.0 (8.01-86.0) and 83.0 (82.0-86.0) years (p = 0.3), respectively. Men accounted for approximately 70% of the patients in both groups. The objective response rate was 35.9% in the LEN group and 33.7% in the Atez/Bev group (p = 0.8), whereas the disease control rates in the LEN and Atez/Bev groups were 62.9% and 63.0%, respectively (p = 1.0). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the LEN and Atez/Bev groups was 6.3 and 7.2 months, respectively, which were not significantly different (p = 0.2). The median overall survival (OS) was 17.9 months in the LEN group and 14.0 months in the Atez/Bev group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.7). In multivariate analyses, the choice of treatment (LEN vs. Atez/Bev) showed no association with PFS or OS. The Atez/Bev group had a significantly higher rate of postprogression treatment (59.0% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.01) and a lower rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (69 [40.6%] vs. 19 [20.7%], p < 0.001) compared to the LEN group.

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab showed comparable effectiveness to LEN in HCC patients aged 80 years and older. Given the results of postprogression treatment and discontinuation due to adverse events, Atez/Bev could serve as a first-line treatment even for elderly HCC patients.

Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh class B

Background/Aim

Numerous agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, are now available for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. Most trials involving systemic chemotherapy have included patients with Child-Pugh class A, while excluding or minimally enrolling those with Child-Pugh class B, due to liver dysfunction-related mortality. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival in Child-Pugh class B patients receiving sorafenib (SOR), lenvatinib (LEN), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ+BEV), or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

Patients and Methods

From December 2003 to June 2023, 137 patients with advanced HCC receiving systemic chemotherapies (SOR: n=43, LEN: n=16, ATZ+BEV: n=18, HAIC: n=60) were enrolled.

Results

Overall survival (OS) and response rates did not differ significantly across treatments (SOR: 8.3 months, LEN: 10.2 months, ATZ+BEV: 8.5 months, HAIC: 7.3 months). Patients on HAIC and LEN had a lower rate of discontinuing treatment within three months compared to those on ATZ+BEV and SOR. HAIC was associated with fewer changes in ALBI score and better preservation of liver function. Multivariate logistic regression identified serum α-fetoprotein >400 ng/ml [hazard ratio (HR)=1.94; p=0.001], tumor count >5 (HR=1.55; p=0.043), and Child-Pugh score (HR=2.53; p=0.002) as independent predictors of OS.

Conclusion

OS and response rates were similar across systemic chemotherapies. Prognosis for HCC in Child-Pugh class B patients was associated with liver function, necessitating further research for optimal treatment.

Insights into lenvatinib resistance: mechanisms, potential biomarkers, and strategies to enhance sensitivity

Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor capable of promoting apoptosis, suppressing angiogenesis, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, and modulating the immune response. In multiple cancer types, lenvatinib has presented manageable safety and is currently approved as an effective first-line therapy. However, with the gradual increase in lenvatinib application, the inevitable progression of resistance to lenvatinib is becoming more prevalent. A series of recent researches have reported the mechanisms underlying the development of lenvatinib resistance in tumor therapy, which are related to the regulation of cell death or proliferation, histological transformation, metabolism, transport processes, and epigenetics. In this review, we aim to outline recent discoveries achieved in terms of the mechanisms and potential predictive biomarkers of lenvatinib resistance as well as to summarize untapped approaches available for improving the therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with various types of cancers.

Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib in Very Old Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Data concerning the use of lenvatinib in very old patients (≥ 80 years) are limited, although the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in this patient population is constantly increasing.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in a large cohort of very old patients (≥ 80 years) with unresectable HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted on a cohort of 1325 patients from 46 centers in four Western and Eastern countries (Italy, Germany, Japan, and the Republic of Korea) who were undergoing first-line treatment with lenvatinib between July 2010 and February 2022. Patients were stratified according to age as very old (≥ 80 years) and not very old (< 80 years).

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months for patients < 80 years old and 18.4 months for patients ≥ 80 years old [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.25, p = 0.8281]. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months for patients < 80 years old and 6.5 months for patients ≥ 80 years old (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.25, p = 0.3954). No differences between the two study groups were found in terms of disease control rate (DCR; 80.8% versus 78.8%; p = 0.44) and response rate (RR; 38.2% versus 37.9%; p = 0.88). Patients < 80 years old experienced significantly more hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) grade ≥ 2 and decreased appetite grade ≥ 2. Conversely, patients ≥ 80 years old experienced significantly more fatigue grade ≥ 2. In the very old group, parameters associated with prognosis were AFP, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), and Child-Pugh score. BCLC stage was the only independent predictor of overall survival (OS; HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.29, p = 0.01115).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the same efficacy and safety of lenvatinib between very old and not very old patients.

Outcomes of Patients with Child-Pugh B and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing First-Line Systemic Treatment with Sorafenib, Lenvatinib, or Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

INTRODUCTION

Systemic therapy is recommended for patients with Child-Pugh A in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We analyzed the outcomes of a cohort of patients with HCC who received either sorafenib (Sor), lenvatinib (Len) or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo + Bev) as first-line systemic therapy for HCC, with the aim of identifying prognostic factors for survival.

METHODS

A total of 825 patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A or B received either Sor, Len or Atezo + Bev as first-line systemic therapy. Liver function was assessed according to the Child-Pugh score and the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade.

RESULTS

Prognosis was analyzed according to liver function such as Child-Pugh classifications, scores, and mALBI grades that worsened with a decline in liver function (p <0.001 for all). A Child-Pugh score of 7 was a factor significantly associated with OS. In patients with a Child-Pugh score of 7, an mALBI grade of 3 was an independent predictor of OS. In Child-Pugh B patients with HCC, receiving Atezo + Bev was identified as a factor associated with PFS.

CONCLUSION

Determining the hepatic reserve of patients with unresectable HCC might be useful for identifying patents suitable for systemic treatment for HCC. Atezo + Bev might prolong the PFS of patients with a Child-Pugh score of 7.

Comparison between Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh Class B in Real-World Clinical Settings

INTRODUCTION

Systemic treatment is generally recommended for Child-Pugh (CP) A status patients with an unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study aimed to elucidate differences regarding therapeutic efficacy between lenvatinib (LEN), a multi-molecular target agent, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev), a newly developed immune-combined therapeutic regimen for CP-B patients affected by uHCC.

METHODS

From April 2018 to July 2022, 128 patients with uHCC treated with Atez/Bev (n = 29) or LEN (n = 99) as the initial systemic treatment were enrolled (median age 71 years; males 97; CP score 7:8:9 = 94:28:6; median albumin-bilirubin score -1.71). Therapeutic response was evaluated using RECIST, version 1.1. Clinical features and prognosis were retrospectively examined.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the Atez/Bev and LEN groups in regard to best response (CR:PR:SD:PD = 0:5:12:7 vs. 5:22:25:20, p = 0.415), progression-free survival (PFS) (median 5.0 [95% CI: 2.4-7] vs. 5.5 [95% CI: 3.4-7.9] months, p = 0.332), or overall survival (OS) (5.8 [95% CI: 4.3-11] vs. 8.8 [95% CI: 6.1-12.9] months, p = 0.178). Adverse events (any grade/≥ grade 3) were observed in 72.4%/17.2% (n = 21/5) of patients treated with Atez/Bev and 78.8%/25.3% (n = 78/25) of those treated with LEN (p = 0.46/0.46).

DISCUSSION

This retrospective study found no significant differences regarding PFS or OS between CP-B patients given Atez/Bev or LEN as initial systemic treatment for uHCC.

Sequential therapies after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study was to compare different second-line treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and progressive disease (PD) after first-line lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1381 patients had PD at first-line therapy. 917 patients received lenvatinib as first-line treatment, and 464 patients atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line.

RESULTS

49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in overall survival (OS) between lenvatinib (20.6months) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line (15.7months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio [HR]= 0.80). After lenvatinib first-line, there wasn't any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 versus 15.8months, p < 0.01; HR=0.64). After atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; lenvatinib HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received lenvatinib (17.0months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR=0.45, and p < 0.05; HR=0.46).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of patients receiving first-line lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is lenvatinib, while in patients progressed to lenvatinib, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.

Clinical outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter real-world study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare response rates of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, in first-line real-world setting.

METHODS

Overall cohort included Western and Eastern hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient populations from 46 centres in 4 countries (Italy, Germany, Japan, and Republic of Korea).

RESULTS

1312 patients were treated with lenvatinib, and 823 patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Objective response rate (ORR) was 38.6% for patients receiving lenvatinib, and 27.3% for patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (p < 0.01; odds ratio 0.60). For patients who achieved complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) was not reached in both arms, but the result from univariate Cox regression model showed 62% reduction of death risk for patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (p = 0.05). In all multivariate analyses, treatment arm was not found to be an independent factor conditioning OS. Comparing ORR achieved in the two arms, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of lenvatinib compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in all subgroups except for Eastern patients, Child-Pugh B patients, presence of portal vein thrombosis, α-feto-protein ≥ 400 ng/mL, presence of extrahepatic disease, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2, and no previous locoregional procedures.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib achieves higher ORR in all patient subgroups. Patients who achieve CR with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab can achieve OS so far never recorded in HCC patients. This study did not highlight any factors that could identify patient subgroups capable of obtaining CR.

Survival outcomes from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus Lenvatinib in Child Pugh B unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients

INTRODUCTION

The best first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh (CP) class B remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to perform a real-world analysis on a large sample of patients with unresectable HCC with CP B treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab Vs Lenvatinib.

METHODS

The study population included patients affected by advanced (BCLC-C) or intermediate (BCLC-B) HCC patients not suitable for locoregional therapies from both the Western and Eastern world (Italy, Germany, Republic of Korea and Japan), who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or Lenvatinib as first-line treatment. All the study population presented a CP class of B. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall survival (OS) of CP B patients treated with Lenvatinib compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Survival curves were estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan-Meier. The role of stratification factors was analyzed with log-rank tests. Finally, an interaction test was performed for the main baseline clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

217 CP B HCC patients were enrolled in the study: 65 (30%) received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and 152 (70%) received lenvatinib. The mOS for patients receiving Lenvatinib was 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.6-16.0), compared to 8.2 months (95% CI 6.3-10.2) for patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment (atezolizumab plus bevacizumab Vs Lenvatinib: HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, p = 0.0050). No statistically significant differences were highlighted in terms of mPFS. The multivariate analysis confirmed that patients receiving Lenvatinib as first-line treatment have a significantly longer OS compared to patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.29-3.25, p = 0.0023). By evaluating the cohort of patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, we found that Child B patients with ECOG PS 0, or BCLC B stage or ALBI grade 1 were those who had benefited from the treatment thus showing survival outcomes no significantly different compared to those receiving Lenvatinib.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests for the first time a major benefit from Lenvatinib compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in a large cohort of patients with CP B class HCC.

Tumor Radiomic Features on Pretreatment MRI to Predict Response to Lenvatinib plus an Anti-PD-1 Antibody in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study

Introduction

Lenvatinib plus an anti-PD-1 antibody has shown promising antitumor effects in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but with clinical benefit limited to a subset of patients. We developed and validated a radiomic-based model to predict objective response to this combination therapy in advanced HCC patients.

Methods

Patients (N = 170) who received first-line combination therapy with lenvatinib plus an anti-PD-1 antibody were retrospectively enrolled from 9 Chinese centers; 124 and 46 into the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment contrast-enhanced MRI. After feature selection, clinicopathologic, radiomic, and clinicopathologic-radiomic models were built using a neural network. The performance of models, incremental predictive value of radiomic features compared with clinicopathologic features and relationship between radiomic features and survivals were assessed.

Results

The clinicopathologic model modestly predicted objective response with an AUC of 0.748 (95% CI: 0.656-0.840) and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.547-0.884) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The radiomic model predicted response with an AUC of 0.886 (95% CI: 0.815-0.957) and 0.820 (95% CI: 0.648-0.984), respectively, with good calibration and clinical utility. The incremental predictive value of radiomic features to clinicopathologic features was confirmed with a net reclassification index of 47.9% (p < 0.001) and 41.5% (p = 0.025) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, radiomic features were associated with overall survival and progression-free survival both in the training and validation cohorts, but modified albumin-bilirubin grade and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were not.

Conclusion

Radiomic features extracted from pretreatment MRI can predict individualized objective response to combination therapy with lenvatinib plus an anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with unresectable or advanced HCC, provide incremental predictive value over clinicopathologic features, and are associated with overall survival and progression-free survival after initiation of this combination regimen.

Management of hypertension during lenvatinib for advanced thyroid cancer: a suggested diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm

Background

Hypertension (HTN) is the most frequent adverse event during treatment with lenvatinib (LEN), but data on its best management are limited.

Aim

The objective of this study was to assess incidence, features and best management of LEN-related HTN in a consecutive single tertiary-care centre cohort.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients were followed up for a mean time of 29.8 months (6-77 months).

Results

After a mean follow-up of 6.8 months, HTN was recorded in 76% of cases, as a de novo occurrence in half of them. HTN significantly correlated with LEN dose and was of grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 in 5%, 50% and 45% of patients, respectively. The majority (77%) of patients with HTN developed proteinuria. There was no correlation between HTN and proteinuria or clinical features or best morphological response or any other adverse event (AE), with the exception of diarrhoea. Patients with or without pre-existing HTN or any other cardiovascular disease had a similar incidence of HTN during LEN, thus excluding the impact of this potential predisposing factor. After evaluation by a dedicated cardiologist, medical treatment was introduced in 21/22 patients (polytherapy in 20 of them). The most frequently used drugs were calcium channel blockers (CCBs) due to their effect on vasodilation. In case of poor control, CCBs were associated with one or more anti-hypertensive drug.

Conclusion

HTN is a frequent and early AE in patients on LEN treatment. We suggest a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm to be applied in clinical practice to allow efficient HTN control and improve patient compliance, reducing LEN discontinuation.

Effects of Lenvatinib on Skeletal Muscle Volume and Cardiac Function in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Previously, we reported that the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib decreases serum levels of carnitine and reduces skeletal muscle volume. Moreover, others reported that TKIs might lead to cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of lenvatinib (LEN) on skeletal muscle volume and cardiac function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 58 adult Japanese patients with chronic liver diseases and HCC treated with LEN. Blood samples were collected before and after 4 weeks of treatment, and serum carnitine fraction and myostatin levels were measured. Before and after 4-6 weeks of treatment, the skeletal muscle index (SMI) was evaluated from computed tomography images and cardiac function was assessed by ultrasound cardiography.

RESULTS

After treatment, SMI, serum levels of total carnitine, and global longitudinal strain were significantly lower, but serum levels of myostatin were significantly higher. Left ventricular ejection fraction showed no significant change.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HCC, LEN decreases serum levels of carnitine, skeletal muscle volume, and worsens cardiac function.

Safety and Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice: An Observational Post-Marketing Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib was approved for use in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in Japan in 2018. Patients with diverse clinical characteristics receive lenvatinib treatment in clinical practice. Thus, it is crucial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib in real-world clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib for uHCC in clinical practice in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2018 and January 2019, patients with uHCC who were administered lenvatinib for the first time were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, observational post-marketing study (NCT03663114). Patients were orally administered lenvatinib and followed up for 12 months. For safety, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated. For effectiveness, the objective response rate (ORR) was calculated to evaluate tumor response. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Data of 703 patients (median age, 73 years; 80.2% males) were analyzed. The median (range) treatment duration was 25.3 (0.3-68.9) weeks. The mean ± standard deviation initial dose was 7.37 ± 1.65 mg in patients with body weight < 60 kg and 10.43 ± 2.49 mg in those with body weight ≥ 60 kg. ADRs (any grade) were reported in 84.9% of the patients, with Grade ≥ 3 ADRs reported in 42.5% of the patients. The most common ADRs (> 10%) were decreased appetite, fatigue, hypertension, proteinuria, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hypothyroidism, and diarrhea. The median OS of the 703 patients was 498.0 days. In 494 patients assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), the ORR was 39.5% (95% confidence interval: 35.1-43.9%). Patients with better liver or renal function at baseline achieved significantly higher ORR than those with worse liver or renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with uHCC in real-world clinical practice in Japan, treatment with lenvatinib was generally well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The ORR and median OS were similar to or better than the results of the Japanese subset of the global Phase III REFLECT trial. Our results demonstrated that clinically meaningful treatment responses were achieved with lenvatinib in real-world clinical practice.

Clinical Outcomes of Cabozantinib in Patients Previously Treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Importance of Good Liver Function and Good Performance Status

(1) Background: This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes for cabozantinib in clinical practice in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev), with a focus on whether patients met criteria of Child-Pugh Class A and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score 0/1 at baseline. (2) Methods: Eleven patients (57.9%) met the criteria of both Child-Pugh class A and ECOG-PS score 0/1 (CP-A+PS-0/1 group) and eight patients (42.1%) did not (Non-CP-A+PS-0/1 group); efficacy and safety were retrospectively evaluated. (3) Results: Disease control rate was significantly higher in the CP-A+PS-0/1 group (81.1%) than in the non-CP-A+PS-0/1 group (12.5%). Median progression-free survival, overall survival and duration of cabozantinib treatment were significantly longer in the CP-A+PS-0/1 group (3.9 months, 13.4 months, and 8.3 months, respectively) than in the Non-CP-A+PS-0/1 group (1.2 months, 1.7 months, and 0.8 months, respectively). Median daily dose of cabozantinib was significantly higher in the CP-A+PS-0/1 group (22.9 mg/day) than in the non-CP-A+PS-0/1 group (16.9 mg/day). (4) Conclusions: Cabozantinib in patients previously treated with Atz/Bev has potential therapeutic efficacy and safety if patients have good liver function (Child-Pugh A) and are in good general condition (ECOG-PS 0/1).

A multifunctional nanotheranostic agent based on Lenvatinib for multimodal synergistic hepatocellular carcinoma therapy with remarkably enhanced efficacy

Lenvatinib (LT), a first-line molecular targeted therapeutic drug for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has been replacing the status of Sorafenib (SF) as the clinically preferred and irreplaceable treatment for a decade. To overcome the low drug utilization and limited single efficacy of LT, ultrasmall copper sulfide nanocrystals (Cu_2-xS NCs), and ultrasmall gold nanoparticle (AuNPs) were evenly wrapped into galactosamine conjugated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) as the drug delivery nanoparticles (CAL@PG) by nanoprecipitation. The CAL@PG NPs exhibited excellent stability under physiological conditions, whereas they released LT rapidly in the unique tumor microenvironment (TME) and high temperature, which could be provided by the near-infrared-II (NIR-II) photothermal effect of Cu_2-xS NCs. Moreover, the temperature elevation, regenerated hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and lower pH of TME could substantially boost the reaction potency of copper Fenton-like chemistry. More importantly, this combined therapy significantly improved the efficacy of LT, provided a multifunctional LT delivery system, and enriched the nanoparticle-augmented multimodal synergistic HCC therapy modality.

Telephone follow-up contributes to improving adherence and treatment duration in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study aimed to investigate whether telephone follow-up by clinical pharmacists for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with lenvatinib (LEN) contributes to improved adherence and treatment duration for LEN.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 132 patients with HCC who were treated with LEN. The patients were classified into non-telephone follow-up (n = 32) or telephone follow-up groups (n = 100) [the latter group was further classified into family-pharmacist (FP) telephone follow-up (n = 18), or hospital family-pharmacist (HFP) telephone follow-up (n = 82) groups].

RESULTS

The progression-free survival (PFS) in the telephone follow-up group was significantly higher than that in the non-telephone follow-up group (PFS 6.1 months vs 3.7 months, P = 0.001, respectively). Although treatment duration was significantly longer in the telephone follow-up group than in the non-telephone follow-up group [median treatment duration: 10.4 months vs 4.1 months, P = 0.001, respectively.], no significant differences were noted between the HFP telephone follow-up group and FP telephone follow-up groups (10.3 months vs 13.3 months, P = 0.543). Self-interruption and adverse-event discontinuation in the HFP-telephone follow-up group were significantly lower than those in the FP-telephone and non-telephone groups (0% vs 11.1% vs 18.8%; P < 0.001, 25.6% vs 33.3% vs 53.1%; P = 0.022, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone follow-up contributes to prolonged treatment duration for LEN in patients with HCC treated. Moreover, telephone follow-up with an HFP may further improve treatment adherence.

Therapeutic Modifications without Discontinuation of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Therapy Are Associated with Favorable Overall Survival and Time to Progression in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of therapeutic modifications of atezolizumab (Atezo) plus bevacizumab (Bev) therapy (Atezo/Bev), including the interruption or discontinuation of both Atezo and Bev, and the reduction or discontinuation of Bev, on the outcome of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) (median observation period: 9.40 months). One hundred uHCC from five hospitals were included. Therapeutic modifications without discontinuation of both Atezo and Bev (n = 46) were associated with favorable overall survival (median not reached; hazard ratio (HR): 0.23) and time to progression (median: 10.00 months; HR: 0.23) with no therapeutic modification defined as the reference. In contrast, the discontinuation of both Atezo and Bev without other therapeutic modifications (n = 20) was associated with unfavorable overall survival (median: 9.63 months; HR: 2.72) and time to progression (median: 2.53 months; HR: 2.78). Patients with modified albumin-bilirubin grade 2b liver function (n = 43) or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (n = 31) discontinued both Atezo and Bev without other therapeutic modifications more frequently (30.2% and 35.5%, respectively) than those with modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1 (10.2%) and without irAEs (13.0%). Patients with objective response (n = 48) experienced irAEs more frequently (n = 21) than those without (n = 10) (p = 0.027). Avoiding the discontinuation of both Atezo and Bev without other therapeutic modifications may be the optimal management of uHCC.

Real-World Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Hepatocellular (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally.¹ Although most cases of HCC were historically attributed to underlying chronic viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is projected to become the most common risk factor for HCC with the rising prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus and increasing availability of effective treatments for hepatitis B and C infection.² Although patients with viral and nonviral HCC seem to have similar overall prognosis,³ prior data have suggested possible differential efficacy of systemic therapies by liver disease etiology. For example, sorafenib was shown to have greater efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection than other etiologies.⁴ The aim of our descriptive study was to report the effectiveness of lenvatinib in a real-world cohort of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related HCC.

Initial therapeutic results of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the importance of hepatic functional reserve

AIM

We analyzed the association between the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade and therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we included 71 u-HCC patients treated with Atezo+Bev between September 2020 and September 2021. Patients were grouped corresponding to the mALBI grade at the start of treatment (mALBI 1+2a or mALBI 2b+3) and analyzed for therapeutic effect and the transition rate to secondary treatment.

RESULTS

According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the overall response rate was significantly higher for the mALBI 1+2a group, than for the mALBI 2b+3 group, with 26.2% and 3.4%, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the mALBI 1+2a group (10.5 months) than in the mALBI 2b+3 group (3.0 months). In the multivariate analysis, an mALBI of 1+2a was found to be an independent factor of PFS. The rate of second-line treatment with multi-targeted agents was also significantly higher in the mALBI 1+2a group.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, Atezo+Bev treatment might have higher therapeutic efficacy in u-HCC patients with mALBI 1+2a.

The beneficial impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease on lenvatinib treatment in patients with non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Lenvatinib is used to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is becoming a major etiology of HCC. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MAFLD on the efficacy of lenvatinib.

METHODS

We enrolled 320 patients with HCC who were treated with lenvatinib. All patients were classified into the MAFLD (n = 155) and non-MAFLD (n = 165) groups. Independent factors for overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In the stratification analysis, HCC was categorized as non-viral (n = 115) or viral HCC (n = 205).

RESULTS

The OS rate was significantly higher in the MAFLD group than in the non-MAFLD group (median 21.1 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, in addition to albumin-bilirubin grade and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, MAFLD was identified as an independent factor for OS (HR 0.722, 95% CI 0.539-0.966, p = 0.028). In the stratification analysis, the OS rate was significantly higher in the MAFLD group than in the non-MAFLD group among patients with non-viral HCC (median 21.1 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.002), but not in patients with viral HCC. Furthermore, MAFLD was an independent negative risk factor for OS in patients with non-viral HCC (HR 0.506, 95% CI 0.297-0.864, P < 0.01). However, MAFLD was not an independent factor for OS in patients with viral HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD was a beneficial factor for survival in patients with HCC treated with lenvatinib. Moreover, the better OS of the MAFLD group was more pronounced in patients with non-viral HCC. Lenvatinib may be a suitable agent for patients with non-viral HCC and MAFLD.

Recent therapeutics in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor of hepatocytes. It is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system that often has initially hidden presentation followed by rapid progression. There are no obvious symptoms in the early stage of HCC. When diagnosed, most patients have locally advanced tumor or distant metastasis; therefore, HCC is difficult to treat and only supportive and symptomatic treatment is adopted. The prognosis is poor and survival time is short. How to effectively treat HCC is important clinically. In recent years, advances in medical technology have resulted in comprehensive treatment methods based on surgery.

Does first-line treatment have prognostic impact for unresectable HCC?-Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib

BACKGROUND/AIM

A comparison of therapeutic efficacy between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and lenvatinib treatment given as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) in regard to progression-free survival (PFS) overall survival (OS) has not been reported. We aimed to elucidate which of those given as initial treatment for u-HCC has greater prognostic impact on PFS and OS of affected patients, retrospectively.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From 2020 to January 2022, 251 u-HCC (Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, BCLC-B/C) treated were enrolled (Atez/Bev-group, n = 194; lenvatinib-group, n = 57). PFS and OS were analyzed following adjustment based on inverse probability weighting (IPW).

RESULTS

There was a greater number of patients with macro-vascular invasion in Atez/Bev-group (22.7% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.022). In lenvatinib-group, the frequencies of appetite loss (38.6% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.002), hypothyroidism (21.1% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.004), hand foot skin reaction (19.3% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and diarrhea (10.5% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.012) were greater, while that of general fatigue was lower (22.8% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.008). Comparisons of therapeutic best response using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) did not show significant differences between the present groups (Atez/Bev vs. lenvatinib: CR/PR/SD/PD = 6.1%/39.1%/39.1%/15.6% vs. 0%/48.0%/38.0%/14.0%, p = 0.285). In patients of discontinuation of treatments, 48.2% switched to lenvatinib, 10.6% continued beyond PD, 8.2% received another systemic treatment, 5.9% underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), 3.5% received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and 1.2% underwent surgical resection in Atez/Bev-group, while 42.2% switched to Atez/Bev, 4.4% continued beyond PD, 4.4% received another systemic treatment, 2.2% nivolumab, 6.7% received TACE, and 2.2% received HAIC in lenvatinib-group. Following adjustment with inverse probability weighting (IPW), Atez/Bev-group showed better PFS (0.5-/1-/1.5-years: 56.6%/31.6%/non-estimable vs. 48.6%/20.4%/11.2%, p < 0.0001) and OS rates (0.5-/1-/1.5-years: 89.6%/67.2%/58.1% vs. 77.8%/66.2%/52.7%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that u-HCC patients who received Atez/Bev as a first-line treatment may have a better prognosis than those who received lenvatinib.

Five years of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: are there any predictive and/or prognostic factors?

INTRODUCTION

Lenvatinib was the first drug approved in 2017 for first-line treatment of hepatocarcinoma (HCC) after 10 years of Sorafenib as exclusive standard of care. The therapeutic armamentarium has recently expanded following the approval of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

AREAS COVERED

Numerous studies have been conducted during the past 5 years on Lenvatinib use in real-world settings in an effort to determine prognostic and predictive factors of Lenvatinib efficacy. In order to choose the most effective therapeutic approach, it may be helpful to summarize these results in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

A subgroup that appears to benefit most from Lenvatinib therapy are patients with non-viral cirrhosis. This aspect is of great importance today considering the increase in NASH prevalence. Also, a significant proportion of BCLC B patients appear to respond well to Lenvatinib therapy. The biological heterogeneity highlighted in HCC patients, along with the growing number of therapeutic options, makes the identification of stratification tools able to define which patients are more likely to respond to a treatment rather than another one of crucial interest. Further investigation deepening the biological pathways underlying HCC carcinogenesis are of particular interest in order to pave the way for precision medicine even for HCC patients.

Validation of the easy-to-use lenvatinib prognostic index to predict prognosis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib

AIM

The identification of new prognostic factors able to stratify hepatocellular carcinoma patients candidate to first-line therapy is urgent. In the present work we validated the prognostic value of the lenvatinib prognostic index.

METHODS

Data of Eastern and Western patients treated with lenvatinib as first-line for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C hepatocellular carcinoma were recollected. The lenvatinib prognostic index was composed by three classes of risk according with our previous study. The "low risk" group includes patients with prognostic nutritional index (PNI) >43.3 and with previous transarterial chemoembolization. The "medium risk" group includes patients with PNI >43.3, but without previous transarterial chemoembolization and patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin grade 1 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B. The "high risk" group includes patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin grade 2, and patients with PNI <43.3, albumin-bilirubin grade 1 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C.

RESULTS

A total of 717 patients were included. The median overall survival was 20.7 months (95% CI 16.1-51.6) in patients with low risk (n = 223), 16.7 months (95% CI 13.3-47.0) in patients with medium risk (n = 264), and 10.7 months (95% CI 9.3-12.2) in patients with high risk (n = 230; HR 1, 1.29, and 1.92, respectively; p < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 6.3-46.5) in patients with low risk, 6.4 months (95% CI 5.3-8.0) in patients with medium risk ,and 4.9 months (95% CI 4.3-5.5) in patients with high risk (HR 1, 1.07, 1.47 respectively; p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

The lenvatinib prognostic index confirms its prognostic value on an external cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with Lenvatinib.

Efficacy of rechallenge transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after lenvatinib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We evaluated the efficacy of rechallenge transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) after lenvatinib (LEN) treatment in patients with previous TACE failure/refractoriness.

METHODS

We enrolled 63 consecutive patients with a history of TACE failure/refractoriness prior to LEN treatment as a first-line systemic therapy. We reviewed the clinical backgrounds and courses of the patients.

RESULTS

In total, 25 patients underwent rechallenge TACE after LEN due to LEN-refractoriness (17 cases) or intolerance (8 cases). A complete or partial response was obtained for 13 (65.0%) of the 20 patients whose therapeutic effects were determined. The survival rate of patients who underwent rechallenge TACE was significantly higher than that of patients who did not undergo rechallenge TACE (median survival time, not reached vs 403 days, P = 0.015). Rechallenge TACE significantly reduced the risk of death in univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.69, P = 0.008) and multivariate analyses (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.80, P = 0.019). If complete or partial response was obtained by rechallenge TACE, the median survival time of these patients was significantly longer than those of the progressive disease (PD) group (P = 0.05), and the median survival time of the PD group after rechallenge TACE was not different from that of the group who did not undergo rechallenge TACE (P = 0.36). We did not observe a decrease in the ALBI score after TACE.

CONCLUSION

Rechallenge TACE after LEN is an effective treatment that may result in a favorable prognosis.

Deterioration of liver function and aging disturb sequential systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who were eligible for sequential systemic therapy. We evaluated 365 patients with HCC who underwent systemic therapy after 2017. The overall survival (OS) was 13.7 months, 19.2 months, and 35.6 months in the first-line, second-line, and third-line or later therapy groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the modified-albumin-bilirubin (m-ALBI) grade, macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), and sequential therapy were independent factors for OS. At the end of each therapy, the ALBI score was significantly worse among patients with discontinuation due to AEs than among those without. The conversion rate to second-line and third-line therapy among patients with discontinuation due to AEs was significantly lower than that among patients without (30.4% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001; 6.7% vs. 58.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). In the decision tree analysis, m-ALBI grade 1 or 2a and non-advanced age were selected splitting variables, respectively, for sequential systemic therapy. In conclusion, sequential therapy prolonged the OS of unresectable HCC. Additionally, good hepatic function and non-advanced age were clinically eligible characteristics for sequential systemic therapy.

Therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh class A or B liver function in real-world clinical practice

BACKGROUND/AIM

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment is recommended for unresechepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) patients classified as Child-Pugh A (CP-A). This study aimed to elucidate the prognosis of patients treated with Atez/Bev, especially CP-A and -B cases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From September 2020 to March 2022, 457 u-HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev were enrolled (median age 74 years, male:female = 368:89, CP-A:CP-B = 427:30, Child-Pugh score [CPS] 5:6:7:8:9 = 271:156:21:8:1). Therapeutic response was evaluated using RECIST ver.1.1. Clinical features and prognosis were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between CP-A and -B patients in regard to best response (CR:PR:SD:PD = 16:91:194:81 vs. 0:7:13:8, p = 0.739; objective response rate/disease control rate = 28.0%/78.8% vs. 25.0%/71.4%). Analysis performed using inverse probability weighting adjustments of clinical factors other than those related to hepatic reserve function with a p value < 0.10 for comparisons between patients with CP-A and -B showed that the progression-free survival (PFS) rate for CP-A cases was better (6-/12-/18-month: 58.2%/36.1%/27.8% vs. 49.6%/8.7%/non-estimable [NE], p < 0.001), as was overall survival (OS) rate (6-/12-/18-month: 89.9%/71.7%/51.4% versus 63.6%/18.4%/NE; p < 0.001). Median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) for the CPS-5 were 9.5 months/NE, and 5.1/14.0 months for the CPS-6 (both p < 0.001). Furthermore, for modified albumin-bilirubin grade (mALBI)-1/2a/2b, mPFS was 9.4/8.5/5.3 months (p < 0.001) and mOS was NE/17.8/13.4 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Better hepatic function, such as mALBI grade 1 or 2a are thought to indicate a better condition for obtaining sufficient prognosis with Atez/Bev treatment for u-HCC patients, whereas for CP-B patients, who mainly shown an mALBI grade of 2b or 3, Atez/Bev might have less therapeutic efficacy.

Chronological change in serum albumin as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib: proposal of albumin simplified grading based on the modified albumin-bilirubin score (ALBS grade)

BACKGROUND

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and the modified ALBI (mALBI) grade are known useful prognostic factors for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib (LEN-HCC). However, the ALBI score requires complicated logarithmic calculations. Therefore, we attempted to create a simplified score.

METHODS

We developed the albumin simplified (ALBS) grade that corresponded to mALBI using the data of 5985 newly developed HCC and examined the usefulness of this grading system for the prediction of the prognosis of 678 patients with LEN-HCC.

RESULTS

The analysis using Cox proportional hazard models revealed that the overall survival of patients with LEN-HCC was not correlated with the total bilirubin but albumin (Alb), which means that the prediction with Alb alone was logical. The ALBS grade cutoffs that corresponded to mALBI grade 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 were Alb ≧ 4.0 g/dL, 4.0 g/dL > Alb ≧3.5 g/dL, 3.5 g/dL > Alb≧2.8 g/dL, and Alb < 2.8 g/dL, respectively. The stratification ability of the ALBS grade for LEN-HCC was good. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and c-index were comparable with those of mALBI (AIC 4096.3 vs. 4090.7, c-index 0.765 vs. 0.778). The prognosis of LEN-HCC was stratified by the ALBS grade at 1 month after starting LEN, and patients with ALBS grade 1/2a demonstrated better survival than patients with ALBS grade 2b/3 regardless of the ALBS grade before treatment.

CONCLUSION

The ALBS grade is easy to calculate and is useful for the prediction of the prognosis of LEN-HCC.

Hepatitis C virus eradication ameliorates the prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence following hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication has been previously reported, but the impact of HCV eradication on advanced HCC patient survival remains unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of HCV eradication on the survival outcome of patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib. One hundred and three HCV-related advanced HCC patients who were treated with sorafenib were enrolled in this study. Of these, 43 patients were administered antiviral therapy before sorafenib treatment (HCV eradication group), while 60 patients remained HCV-infected (HCV non-eradication group). We analysed the impact of HCV eradication on survival in advanced HCC treated with sorafenib. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the HCV eradication group than in the HCV non-eradication group (24.0 months vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.001). Although there was no significant difference in the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score at the start of treatment between the HCV eradication group and the non-eradication group (p = 0.065), the ALBI score at 2 months after initiation of sorafenib treatment was significantly decreased in the HCV non-eradication group (p < 0.001), but not in the HCV eradication group (p = 0.121). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed HCV eradication (hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; p = 0.006) and ALBI score at the start of treatment (HR, 2.47; p = 0.002) as factors that may contribute to OS. HCV eradication may serve an important role in the survival outcome of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

Systemic Treatment of Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma after First-Line Therapy: Expert Recommendations from Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Asia has a high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the high rates of chronic hepatitis B infection and accounts for 70% of HCC cases globally. In the past 20 years, the systemic treatment landscape of advanced HCC has evolved substantially - from tyrosine kinase inhibitors to immune-oncology agents plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. The appropriate sequence of therapies has become critical in optimizing patient outcomes given the increase in systemic therapeutic options. This article evaluates the evidence and provides expert recommendations for the use of systemic therapies after first-line treatment in patients with advanced HCC.

SUMMARY

Based on three virtual meetings held in early 2021, a team of 17 experts comprising oncologists, a hepatologist, and a hepatobiliary surgeon from Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan reviewed available data about systemic treatments for HCC after first line and formulated 28 statements. These statements aimed to provide expert guidance on selecting first and subsequent lines of therapies as well as recommending therapies in special circumstances, such as poor liver function, posttransplantation, recent gastrointestinal bleeding, or autoimmune diseases. Data supporting the statements were drawn from clinical trials and real-world studies. The 28 statements were then evaluated anonymously using a 5-point Likert scale, and 24 reached consensus, predefined as achieving 75% agreement. Statements generated covered the selection of first-line systemic therapy, considerations and goals of second-line systemic therapies, treatment selection following first-line therapy, and treatment recommendations following first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune-oncology monotherapy, or immune-oncology combination therapy. The authors also shared expert opinion on the use of second-line systemic therapy in patients with liver dysfunction, liver transplantation, and recent gastrointestinal or autoimmune disease.

KEY MESSAGES

These expert statements summarize the latest data and expert opinion on selecting systemic treatment following first-line therapy in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic HCC.

Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced HCC and Elevated Alpha-Fetoprotein Treated with Ramucirumab in Two Randomized Phase III Trials

PURPOSE

Ramucirumab is an effective treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL. We aimed to identify prognostic and predictive factors of response to ramucirumab in patients with aHCC with AFP ≥400 ng/mL from the phase III REACH and REACH-2 randomized trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with aHCC, Child-Pugh class A with prior sorafenib treatment were randomized in REACH and REACH-2 (ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo, biweekly). Meta-analysis of individual patient-level data (pooled population) from REACH (AFP ≥400 ng/mL) and REACH-2 was performed. A drug exposure analysis was conducted for those with evaluable pharmacokinetic data. To identify potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. To define predictors of ramucirumab benefit, subgroup-by-treatment interaction terms were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 542 patients (316 ramucirumab, 226 placebo) analyzed, eight variables had independent prognostic value associated with poor outcome (geographical region, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≥1, AFP >1,000 ng/mL, Child-Pugh >A5, extrahepatic spread, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, high alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase). Ramucirumab survival benefit was present across all subgroups, including patients with very aggressive HCC [above median AFP; HR: 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.84] and nonviral aHCC (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.79). While no baseline factor was predictive of a differential OS benefit with ramucirumab, analyses demonstrated an association between high drug exposure, treatment-emergent hypertension (grade ≥3), and increased ramucirumab benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramucirumab provided a survival benefit irrespective of baseline prognostic covariates, and this benefit was greatest in patients with high ramucirumab drug exposure and/or those with treatment-related hypertension.

Prognostic significance of cachexia index in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy

Cancer cachexia affects quality of life, response to chemotherapy, and survival in many advanced cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment cachexia index (CXI) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systematic chemotherapy. Patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib therapy between October 2018 and October 2020 were retrospectively studied. The CXI was calculated as (L3 skeletal muscle index) × (serum albumin)/(neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio). The association with treatment response and early adverse events within the first two months of lenvatinib therapy was investigated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify the predictors of survival. A total of 116 patients (median age: 60, male: 84.5% ) with calculated CXI. They divided into two groups: high CXI (≥ 53, n = 82) and low CXI (< 53, n = 34). Patients with low CXI had a significantly lower disease control rate (61.8% vs. 89.0%, p = 0.001) and a shorter median OS (8.0 [95% CI 6.2–9.8] vs. 12.3 [95% CI 10.1–14.4] months, p = 0.002) than those with high CXI. In multivariable analysis, low CXI was independently associated with shorter OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.17–3.65, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.09–3.09, p = 0.02). Of note, during the first two months of lenvatinib therapy, anorexia (41.2% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.04) developed more frequently among patients with low CXI than those with high CXI. The CXI may be a clinically useful index for predicting poor treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced HCC undergoing lenvatinib treatment.

A prospective observational cohort study of lenvatinib as initial treatment in patients with BCLC-defined stage B hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] B). However, it often leads to a poor prognosis and decreased hepatic function especially in patients with BCLC substage B2. Lenvatinib (LEN) was demonstrated to be efficacious in these patients in the REFLECT phase 3 trial. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEN as a first-line treatment for the patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2.

METHODS

This prospective observational study used LEN in TACE-naïve patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2 and preserved hepatic function. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A one-year survival rate threshold of 60% and an expected survival rate of 78%, based on previous reports of TACE, was assumed for setting the sample size. With a one-sided α-type error of 5% and 70% detection power, 25 patients were required over a 2-year enrollment period and 10-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study from June 2018 to June 2020. The 1-year survival rate was 71.0% (90% confidence interval, 68.4-73.6%). Median overall and progression-free survival periods were 17.0 and 10.4 months, and the objective response rates according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST criteria were 22.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (68%), hypertension (65%), anorexia (61%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (39%), and thrombocytopenia (32%) of any grade; aspartate aminotransferase increased (23%), alanine aminotransferase increased (16%), and grade ≥ 3 proteinuria (13%). Treatment interruption and dose reduction were required in 61% and 81% of patients, respectively. LEN was discontinued in 29 patients due to disease progression (n = 17), AEs (n = 9), conversion to curative treatments (n = 2), and sudden death (n = 1), whereas post-LEN treatments were administered in 18 patients, including systemic chemotherapy (n = 11), TACE (n = 6), transarterial infusion (n = 1) and clinical trial (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that LEN provides treatment benefits as an initial therapeutic in patients with BCLC substage B2 HCC with a safety profile comparable to that previously reported.

Influence of skeletal muscle volume loss during lenvatinib treatment on prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study in Tohoku, Japan

Sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated the association of skeletal muscle volume (SMV) and its change in HCC patients taking lenvatinib. In 130 HCC patients, psoas mass index (PMI) was calculated as the left–right sum of the major × minor axis of psoas muscle at the third lumbar vertebra, divided by height squared. Patients were classified into two groups (low and normal PMI) based on indices of < 6.0 cm²/m² for man and < 3.4 cm²/m² for women. Change in PMI per month during the lenvatinib administration period (ΔPMI/m) was calculated; and patients were classified into two groups (severe and mild atrophy) based on the ΔPMI/m rate, as ≥ 1% or < 1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in Overall survival (OS) between the low and normal PMI groups at the start of lenvatinib administration. OS was significantly lower in the severe atrophy group than in the mild atrophy group (median; 15.2 vs. 25.6 months, P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association of severe atrophy with OS (hazard ratio 1.927, P = 0.031). Progressive loss of SMV is a strong predictor of poor prognosis in HCC patients taking lenvatinib.

Early experience of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC-B stage patients classified as beyond up to seven criteria - Multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although systemic therapy is recommended for patients with multiple intermediate stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) classified as beyond the up-to-7 criteria (UT-7 out/multiple) as a transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) unsuitable condition, few reports have examined the therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy (Atez/Bev) in such cases. This study aimed to elucidate the therapeutic response of Atez/Bev in u-HCC patients classified as UT-7 out/multiple.

MATERIAL/METHODS

From September 2020 to September 2021, 95 u-HCC Japanese patients classified as UT-7 out/multiple/Child-Pugh A were enrolled from 21 institutions (median age 76 years, males 73, Child-Pugh 5:6 = 68:27, TNM stage II:III = 17:78). Therapeutic response was retrospectively evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), ver. 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST).

RESULTS

Atez/Bev was given as first-line treatment to 52 (54.7%). Objective response rate (ORR)/disease control rate (DCR) at six weeks of RECIST and mRECIST were 17.7%/84.7% and 42.5%/86.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 8.0 months (median observation period: 6.0 months). Child-Pugh A/modified Albumin-bilirubin grade (mALBI) 1 and 2a at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 weeks, were 100%/69.4%, 89.8%/57.3%, 94.8%/65.3%, and 91.4%/60.0%, respectively. Among adverse events (any-grade, >10%) during the present observation period, general fatigue was most frequent (23.2%), followed by urine protein (21.1%), appetite loss (20.0%), and hypertension (13.7%).

CONCLUSION

Atez/Bev treatment showed favorable therapeutic response with less influence on hepatic function, suggesting it as a useful therapeutic option for patients with such condition.

Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib: A retrospective analysis

Our study investigated the correlation between sarcopenia and clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib. We retrospectively evaluated 40 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC receiving lenvatinib between November 2018 and May 2020 at the First Hospital of Jilin University. Skeletal muscle mass was measured before treatment initiation. Prognostic significance was assessed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated for patients with and without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was present in 23/40 patients (57.5%). After a median follow-up of 9.2 months, patients with sarcopenia had significantly worse OS and PFS compared with those without sarcopenia (OS: 8.4 months [m] vs 14.7 m, P = .02; PFS: 4.2 m vs 9.0 m, P = .04). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models identified presence of sarcopenia as an independent risk factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.257; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.083-0.794; P = .02). In subgroup analysis, sarcopenia was associated with worse survival than non-sarcopenic patients, irrespective of age, Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage, or albumin-bilirubin grade. Our results show sarcopenia may be a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with HCC receiving lenvatinib. Management of sarcopenia is a vital factor for improving survival outcomes in patients with HCC.

Poor tolerability of lenvatinib in elderly patients ≥80 years old with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter observational study

INTRODUCTION

Management of elderly patients with cancer has become a global issue. We investigated the safety and tolerability of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients ≥80 years old.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 61 HCC patients and divided them into 2 groups: an elderly group (n = 13, ≥80 years old) and a younger group (n = 48, <80 years old). We compared the adverse events (AEs), administration period, dose intensity, objective response, and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups.

RESULTS

The discontinuation of lenvatinib due to AEs was more frequent in the elderly group (8/13, 61.5%) than in the younger group (10/48, 20.8%) (P = 0.0043). Fatigue and appetite loss accounted for half of the cases discontinued due to AEs in the elderly group. The elderly group had a significantly lower 8-week-delivered dose intensity/body surface area ratio (147.2) and 8-week-relative dose intensity (50.0%) than those in the younger group (267.4, 67%) (P = 0.003, 0.029). The objective response rate was significantly lower in the elderly group (15.4%) than in the younger group (61.5%) (P = 0.021). The PFS in the elderly group tended to be shorter than that in the younger group (P = 0.058, hazard ratio [HR] 1.98). The modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade (hepatic function) (HR, 2.60; P = 0.01) and objective response (HR, 0.41; P = 0.011) were independently associated with the PFS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The management of AEs is crucial for adherence and maintaining the dose intensity of lenvatinib in elderly HCC patients.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Early clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Although atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/bev) treatment has been developed for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), changes in hepatic function during therapy have yet to be reported.

AIM

This retrospective clinical study aimed to elucidate early responses to Atez/Bev.

METHODS

From September 2020 to April 2021, 171 u-HCC patients undergoing Atez/Bev treatment were enrolled (BCLC stage A:B:C:D = 5:68:96:2). Of those, 75 had no prior history of systemic treatment. Relative changes in hepatic function and therapeutic response were assessed using albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), ver. 1.1, respectively.

RESULTS

In initial imaging examination findings, objective response rates for early tumor shrinkage and disease control after 6 weeks (ORR-6W/DCR-6W) were 10.6%/79.6%. Similar response results were observed in patients with and without a past history of systemic treatment (ORR-6W/DCR-6W = 9.7%/77.8% and 12.2%/82.9%), as well as patients in whom Atez/Bev was used as post-progression treatment following lenvatinib (ORR-6W/DCR-6W = 7.7%/79.5%), for which no known effective post-progression treatment has been established. In 111 patients who underwent a 6-week observation period, ALBI score was significantly worsened at 3 weeks after introducing Atez/Bev (-2.525 ± 0.419 vs -2.323 ± 0.445, p < .001), but then recovered at 6-weeks (-2.403 ± 0.452) as compared to 3-weeks (p = .001). During the observation period, the most common adverse events were appetite loss (all grades) (12.3%), general fatigue/hypertension (all grades) (11.1%, respectively), and urine protein (all grades) (10.5%).

CONCLUSION

Atez/Bev might have therapeutic potential not only as first but also later-line treatment of existing molecular target agents. In addition, this drug combination may have less influence on hepatic function during the early period, as the present patients showed a good initial therapeutic response.

The Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been approved as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study was designed to assess the clinical impact of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in uHCC patients. A total of 48 uHCC patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were identified, including first-line, second-line, third-line, and later-line settings. In these patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months, including 5.0 months for the first-line treatment, not reached for the second-line treatment, and 2.5 months for the third line and later line treatment. The objective response rate and disease control rate to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were 27.1% and 68.8%, respectively. The severity of most adverse events was predominantly grade 1-2, and most patients tolerated the toxicities. The ratios of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) were used to predict PFS in these patients. The optimal cutoff values of NLR and PLR were 3 and 230, and NLR and PLR were independent prognostic factors for superior PFS in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in uHCC patients in clinical practice and demonstrates the prognostic role of NLR and PLR for PFS in these patients.

Analysis of Survival and Response to Lenvatinib in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

With the recent increase in the number of drug therapy options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), the key issue has become how to prolong overall survival (OS). The aim was to evaluate the association between radiological response and OS in patients treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic treatment for u-HCC. Radiological response using both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) is a predictor of OS and achieving an objective response at the first evaluation is an independent prognostic factor for OS. In addition, if an objective response is obtained at the initial evaluation, continuation of treatment appears desirable because prolonged OS can be expected; but, if stable disease is obtained at the initial evaluation, one should determine whether to continue or switch to the next treatment, with careful consideration of factors related to the tumor and hepatic reserve at the initial evaluation.

Abstract

The association between radiological response and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in patients treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 182 patients with Child–Pugh class A liver function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero or one were enrolled. Radiological evaluation was performed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Initial radiological evaluation confirmed significant stratification of OS by efficacy judgment with both RECIST and mRECIST, and that initial radiological response was an independent prognostic factor for OS on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in patients with stable disease (SD) at initial evaluation, macrovascular invasion at the initial evaluation on RECIST and modified albumin–bilirubin grade at initial evaluation on mRECIST were independent predictors of OS on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, if objective response is obtained at the initial evaluation, continuation of treatment appears desirable because prolonged OS can be expected; but, if SD is obtained at the initial evaluation, one should determine whether to continue or switch to the next treatment, with careful consideration of factors related to the tumor and hepatic reserve at the initial evaluation.

Association between contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and lenvatinib effectiveness in hepatocellular carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the degree of contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT can predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib (LEN). A total of 67 consecutive patients with LEN-treated HCC were retrospectively analysed. In the pretreatment CE-CT, the CT values were measured using a region of interest within the main nodule and the liver parenchyma in the arterial phase, and the macroscopic degree of contrast enhancement of the tumour area was quantified by calculating the enhancement ratio (ER) of the liver parenchyma. The associations of pretreatment ER with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were then investigated. There were 20, 27 and 20 patients in the ER ≥1.5, 1.0≤ ER <1.5 and ER <1.0 groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the PFS and OS among the three ER groups (PFS, P=0.63; OS, P=0.455). The ER <1.0 group had significantly more patients with larger tumour diameters, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C with extrahepatic metastases, and higher des-γ-carboxy prothrombin values compared with the ER ≥1.0 group, suggesting that ER <1.0 reflected more aggressive types of HCC. The multivariate analysis revealed tumour size and α-fetoprotein as independent predictors of shorter PFS. Albumin-bilirubin grade 2 and BCLC stage C were significant predictors of poor OS, whereas the ER was confirmed as a non-significant predictor of both PFS and OS. Only non-alternating LEN and transarterial therapy (AT) were identified as independent predictors of unfavourable OS in patients with BCLC stage B HCC. Therefore, LEN has a strong therapeutic effect on HCC, regardless of the degree of contrast enhancement. Furthermore, AT may prolong the OS of LEN-treated patients with BCLC stage B HCC, regardless of tumour vascularity.

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging may help identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for treatment targeted at RAF1

PURPOSE

The RAF1 expression affects prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. We examined the expression of sorafenib-targeted gene RAF1 to ascertain its relationship with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. We also explored the predictive potential of RAF1 expression markers in the treatment of HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients with HCC who underwent preoperative enhanced MRI scanning were included in this study. We analyzed the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of enhanced MRI findings in patients with HCC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses were used to detect the protein and mRNA expression levels of RAF1 in HCC. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between these image features and the RAF1 gene expression levels in HCC.

RESULTS

The IHC analysis indicated a significant difference in tumor thrombus group (P = 0.037), RT-PCR results revealed a significant between-group difference for both tumor margins (P = 0.033) and capsule (P = 0.04). Binary logistic regression analysis results suggest that independent MRI predictors were regular tumor margins [P = 0.035, odds ratio (OR) = 3.145, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.087-9.103] and thrombus (P = 0.046, OR = 4.421, 95% CI 1.024-19.08) with high RAF1expression; the tumor capsule was not an independent predictor.

CONCLUSION

We found a correlation between MRI features and the RAF1 gene expression, Regular tumor margin and the presence of tumor thrombus are indicators of high RAF1 expression in HCC. Enhanced MRI may be useful for identifying patients with HCC eligible for targeted treatment.

Optimal management of lenvatinib therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma by balancing the therapeutic effect with the relative dose intensity

AIMS

We aimed to assess the optimal management of first or later-line lenvatinib therapy (LEN) for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), by clarifying the difference of degree between relative dose intensity (RDI) to achieve objective response (OR) and disease control (DC) by aiming at stable disease (SD), taking dose modifications into consideration.

METHODS

One hundred uHCC patients who received LEN in first- or later-line settings, between April 2018 and December 2020 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The factors associated with overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), OR and DC were assessed. The optimal cut-off values of RDI 4 weeks after initiation of LEN (RDI during cycle 1) and total RDI (RDI during all cycles) to predict achievement of OR and DC by aiming at SD were determined by receiver operator curve analysis.

RESULTS

Achievement of OR and SD were favorable factors for OS (HR, 0.080 and 0.20) and TTP (HR, 0.052 and 0.073), with progressive disease defined as the reference. RDI ≥ 0.8 during cycle 1 and RDI ≥ 0.4 during cycle 1 contributed to achievement of OR (odds ratio, 3.28) and DC (odds ratio, 4.85), respectively. Experience of dose interruption was associated with a favorable TTP (HR, 0.58). The therapeutic line of LEN did not contribute to OS, TTP or best response.

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve OR and SD for a favorable outcome of first- or later-line LEN, high and moderate early-phase RDI are required, respectively. The degree of RDI during LEN and tolerance need compatible by dose modifications.