Effect of anlotinib as a third- or further-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with different histologic types: Subgroup analysis in the ALTER0303 trial

The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib and Anlotinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Anlotinib and apatinib, both vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), are clinically established in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China, with anlotinib emerging as a standard treatment strategy. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib and anlotinib, and to compare their differences in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with apatinib or anlotinib at a hospital in Eastern China from January 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.

Results

A total of 145 patients were included in this study. Median PFS (mPFS) was 3.53 months for the apatinib group and 5.3 months for the anlotinib group (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84; P = 0.004), and median OS (mOS) was 7.6 months versus 15.6 months (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-1.00; P = 0.048), which all showed significant differences after adjusting for confounders (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that the presence or absence of bone metastases significantly influenced PFS in both treatment groups. The ORR was 3.03% in the anlotinib group versus 10.13% in the apatinib group (P = 0.12), the DCR was 72.73% versus 51.90% (P = 0.21). No unanticipated adverse events (AEs) were observed. The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs was significantly higher in the apatinib group (31.65% vs 13.64%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Anlotinib demonstrated greater efficacy and safety compared to apatinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with bone metastases and EGFR(-).

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy as third- or further-line therapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 probably cannot tolerate chemotherapy or other antitumor therapies. Some studies have reported that immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity. However, the efficacy of this combination as a later-line therapy in patients with ECOG PS 2 is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combination strategy as third- or further-line therapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ECOG PS 2.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients treated with camrelizumab plus antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab, anlotinib, or recombinant human endostatin) were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by ECOG PS, and safety were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 10, 2019, and February 28, 2024, a total of 59 patients were included. The ORR was 35.6% (21/59) and the DCR was 86.4%. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months (range: 0.7-23.7), the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-7.3) and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.6). QOL was improved (≥1 reduction in ECOG PS) in 39 patients (66.1%). The most common Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic dysfunction (6 [10%]), hypertension (5 [8%]), and hypothyroidism (3 [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Third- or further-line immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity in stage IV NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination therapy.

Efficacy and safety of combined anlotinib-oral etoposide treatment for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Despite the availability of numerous treatment options, managing patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) remains challenging, and the prognosis of PROC is notably unfavorable. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined anlotinib-oral etoposide treatment for patients with PROC.

METHODS

Data of 23 patients who were diagnosed with PROC from January 2020 to November 2022 and treated with anlotinib combined with oral etoposide for at least 2 cycles were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among per-protocol patients, 9 (45.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=21.1-68.9) of 20 patients achieved partial response and 17 (85.0%, 95% CI=67.9-100.0) of 20 patients achieved disease control. The median progression-free survival was 8.7 months (95% CI=5.3-11.6). The incidence of adverse events (any grade) was 100%, and the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was 54.5%.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib combined with etoposide emerged effective for the treatment of PROC.

The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

Background

Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive anti-tumor activities. However, almost all studies on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, which might lead to a lack of effective metrics to assess the effectiveness and safety of the therapeutic regimen. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases as of January 13, 2023, was systematically retrieved. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) Methodological items to evaluate the quality of eligible clinical trials. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for further analysis. The random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters.

Results

19 studies (16 were non-comparative single-arm clinical trials and 3 were randomized controlled trials) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 22.4% (95% CI, 16.6-28.1%) and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1%), respectively. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.20 (95% CI, 4.46-5.93) months and 14.09 (95% CI, 13.20-14.97) months, respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 adverse effect (AE) rate was 47.6% (95% CI, 33.1-62.0%).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents has promising efficacy and safety as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023407559.

Re-evaluating the risk factors for radiation pneumonitis in the era of immunotherapy

As one of the common complications of radiotherapy, radiation pneumonia (RP) limits the prognosis of patients. Therefore, better identifying the high-risk factors that lead to RP is essential to effectively prevent its occurrence. However, as lung cancer treatment modalities are being replaced and the era of immunotherapy has arrived, literature that reviews the parameters and mode of radiotherapy, chemotherapy drugs, targeted drugs and current hot immune checkpoint inhibitors related to RP is lacking. This paper summarizes the risk factors for radiation pneumonia by retrieving and analysing previously published literature and the results of large clinical trials. The literature primarily included retrospective analyses, including clinical trials in different periods and a part of the literature review. A systematic literature search of Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed for relevant publications up to 6 Dec. 2022. Search keywords include, but are not limited to, "radiation pneumonia", "pneumonia", "risk factors", "immunotherapy", etc. The factors related to RP in this paper include physical parameters of radiotherapy, including V₅, V₂₀, and MLD; chemoradiotherapy mode and chemotherapy drugs, including paclitaxel and gemcitabine; EGFR-TKI; ALK inhibitors; antiangiogenic drugs; immune drugs and the underlying disease of the patient. We also introduce the possible mechanism of RP. In the future, we hope that this article not only sounds the alarm for clinicians but also helps to identify a method that can effectively intervene and reduce the occurrence of RP, significantly improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients, and more effectively improve the therapeutic effect of radiation therapy.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to assessment the efficacy and safety of Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

In this study, pre-treatment clinical and laboratory indicators from 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were retrieved for retrospective analysis. According to the therapy regimes they received, the patients were separated into groups, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy group (PC group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents' group (PA group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents plus chemotherapy group (PAC group). Cox's proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess the connection between treatment regimens and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the association of treatment regimens with the risk of disease progression and death was evaluated by subgroup analysis.

Results

The average age of the enrolled patients was 58.2 ± 10.2 years and 75.3% were male. Multivariate analyses showed that patients in PA group (Disease progression: HR 0.4, P=0.005. Death: HR 0.4, P=0.024) and PAC group (Disease progression: HR 0.3, P=0.012. Death: HR 0.3, P=0.045) had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression and death compared to patients in PC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in PA group (mPFS:7.5 vs.3.5, P=0.00052. mOS:33.1 vs.21.8, P=0.093) and PAC group (mPFS:5.1 vs.3.5, P=0.075. mOS:37.3 vs.21.8, P=0.14) had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in PC group. In all the pre-defined subgroups, patients in PA and PAC groups showed a decreasing trend in the risk of disease progression and death in most subgroups. The patients in PA group (DCR:96.3% vs.58.3%, P=0.001) and PAC group (DCR:100% vs.58.3%, P=0.019) had a better disease control rate (DCR) than patients in PC group.

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy were superior to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line versus second‐line use of domestic anti‐PD ‐1 antibody sintilimab in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non‐small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitor is a promising therapeutic option that can be used as either a first-line or second-line treatment for driver-negative advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancers (sqNSCLC). However, reuse of PD-1/L1 inhibitor in second-line beyond progression after the first-line is generally not recommended. Therefore, oncologists face challenges in making a proper decision of using PD-1/L1 inhibitor. This analysis aimed to determine whether it is more cost-effective to use sintilimab, a domestic anti-PD-1 drug in China, as a first-line treatment than reserving it until second-line.

METHODS

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the use of sintilimab in the first-line setting with reserving its use until the second-line for driver-negative advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. A Markov model composed of five main mutually independent health states and three temporary health states was established to simulate patients' clinical trajectory. Transition probabilities, including disease progression, survival, and adverse events-related treatment discontinuation, were estimated using data from the ORIENT-12, ORIENT-3, and ALTER0303 clinical trials. The robustness of the model was assessed using deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Reserving the use of sintilimab until the second-line was associated with a greater effectiveness (1.52 vs. 1.37 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and a higher healthcare cost ($12,203 vs. $14,045) compared with the first-line sintilimab, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $12,693 per QALY. The results of DSA suggested that variations in all parameters did not result in the ICERs surpassing the willingness-to-pay threshold of $35,663/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

For Chinese patients with driver-negative advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC, reserving the use of sintilimab until the second-line represents a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with the first-line treatment. This finding is useful to inform Chinese healthcare policymakers regarding the optimized treatment strategies of use of domestic PD-1/L1 inhibitors sintilimab.

A Real-World Study of Optimal Treatment with Anlotinib First-Line Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To observe the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in a real-word environment, explore the optimal treatment regimen for patients with aHCC using anlotinib as a first-line treatment.

Patients and Methods

Data from 62 patients with aHCC who received anlotinib single-drug first-line therapy between February 2019 and November 2021. Patients received anlotinib monotherapy, which may be interrupted or discontinued or changed in the event of unacceptable or severe adverse events (AEs) or failure to inhibit tumor progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Among the 62 patients, in the best overall response assessment, there were 12 with complete response (CR; 19.4%), 17 with partial response (PR; 27.4%), 25 with stable disease (SD; 40.3%), and 8 with progressive disease (PD; 14.5%). The ORR and DCR were 46.8% and 87.1%, respectively. Among the 11 patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors after disease progression, three (27.3%) had CR, one (9.1%) had PR, three (27.3%) had SD, and four (36.4%) had PD. Therefore, the ORR and DCR were 36.4% and 63.6%, respectively. The median PFS for anlotinib monotherapy was 7.37 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.88–8.86) and the median OS did not reach. AEs occurred in 95.2% of patients during anlotinib monotherapy, with the most common being thrombocytopenia (51.6%). The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 38.7%.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment for patients with aHCC. Treatment with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors after disease progression has also shown preliminary efficacy and safety; therefore, sequential therapy with anlotinib-TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors may be an effective treatment for patients with aHCC.

Anlotinib Hydrochloride and PD-1 Blockade as a Salvage Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Progress of Local Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Half a Year After Standard Treatment

Purpose

As for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard treatment mode. But for patients with progress in half a year, which means the second-line chemotherapy effect is not ideal for them. We observed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with PD-1 blockade as the second-line treatment for those patients in this trial.

Patients and Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, 57 patients with the progress of local advanced NSCLC treated with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade until disease progression or intolerance as a result of adverse events. Patients have been assessed using computed tomography prior to treatment and during follow-up every 2 months until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

57 patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 61.4% of the patients were men. The ORR was 50.9% with a median OS time of 14 months and the 1-year OS rates and PFS rates were 81.8% and 33.3%, respectively. The patients with squamous cell carcinoma, no brain or liver metastases had longer PFS than patients with liver metastasis. When the PFS was calculated from the time of second treatment, the median PFS was 9 months. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-3, one drug-related death was noted.

Conclusion

The expected outcome of this study is that anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade has tolerable toxicity and better ORR, OS than second-line chemotherapy. The results may indicate additional treatment options for patients with progress of local advance NSCLC in half a year after standard treatment.

Efficacy and treatment-related adverse events of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their efficacy and safety have been studied in randomized controlled trials.

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the most up-to-date evidence regarding the efficacy and adverse events of TKIs in NSCLC treatment.

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The intervention arm was the TKI-containing group, and the control arm was the TKI-free group. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and adverse events were extracted and synthesized. The last search was performed in April 2022. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of each study. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. I² statistics were used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies (12,517 patients) were included. Compared to the control group, the TKI group had significantly higher ORR (relative risk RR 1.52, 95% confidence interval, CI [1.29, 1.80], P < 0.05), DCR (RR 1.34, 95%CI [1.19, 1.51], P < 0.05), and prolonged PFS (hazard ratio HR 0.67, 95%CI [0.59, 0.77], P < 0.05). The TKI group showed a higher rate of adverse events (RR 1.70, 95%CI [1.34, 2.16], P < 0.05) and grade 3-5 adverse events (RR 1.59, 95% CI [1.35, 1.88], P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TKIs could increase ORR and DCR and prolong PFS for advanced NSCLC. Adverse events should be closely monitored.

FGFR2-ERC1: A Subtype of FGFR2 Oncogenic Fusion Variant in Lung Adenocarcinoma and the Response to Anlotinib

Background

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are small genomic events. At present, there is no standard treatment strategy for patients with NSCLC carrying an FGFR fusion.

Case Presentation

We report the case of a 45-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma and underwent right upper lobectomy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. After 13 months, the patient’s lung lesions progressed. Next-generation sequencing of venous blood and lung tissues confirmed an FGFR2-ERC1 fusion, and she received chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Two months later, the patient’s lung lesions progressed again. Based on the target effect of anlotinib on FGFR, the patient was subsequently treated with anlotinib, and the progression-free survival interval exceeded 8.0 months.

Conclusion

These findings showed that patients with lung adenocarcinoma carrying an FGFR2-ERC1 fusion gene may benefit from anlotinib. This case provided evidence to support the use of anlotinib in the treatment of NSCLC patients with FGFR fusion gene subtypes.

A cohort study of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib versus immune checkpoint inhibitors alone as the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the real world

Background

Anlotinib is a new multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and has been shown to have antitumor effects and synergistic antitumor effects with immunotherapy only in animal studies and in the 2nd-line treatment in small clinical trials. A real-world study with large sample to compare the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with ICIs alone in the multiline treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was urgently needed.

Methods

The data of 535 advanced NSCLC patients were collected from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups: (I) ICI monotherapy (230 patients); (II) ICI + anlotinib (305 patients). After propensity-score matching (PSM) to reduce the effects of biases and confounding variables, the progression-free survival time (PFS), occurrence of adverse events, disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR) of the 2 groups were compared. The effects of clinical factors, including age, gender, gene mutations, tumor proportion score, metastases, and combined radiotherapy, were also analyzed.

Results

After PSM, the baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced and the 2 group had a good comparability. Patients in the ICI + anlotinib group had significantly longer median PFS in both the 2nd-line treatment (7.73 vs. 4.70 months; P=0.003) and 3rd-line treatment (5.90 vs. 3.37 months; P=0.020), but the difference lacked statistical significance in the 1st-line treatment (8.40 vs. 5.20 months; P=0.229). The overall median PFS of patients in the ICI + anlotinib group was also much longer than that of patients in the ICI monotherapy group (6.37 vs. 3.90 months; P<0.001). The ICI + anlotinib group also tended to have a higher DCR, a higher ORR, and a higher probability of severe adverse drug reactions during the treatment than the ICI monotherapy group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Combining ICI + anlotinib could improve the outcomes of patients with bone metastasis.

Conclusions

Anlotinib + ICI therapy could have greater efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients than ICI monotherapy. The probability of adverse events might increase in the combined treatment, but could be controlled.

[Anti-angiogenesis in Lung Cancer: Current Situation, Progress and Confusion]

Lung cancer is a highly vascular tumors, over the past ten years, anti-angiogenes is has been proved to be an effective and highly promising combinational treatment. The data of the combination of anti-angiogenesis with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy has been constantly updating. Advanced lung cancer patients, no matter different groups or different stages of the disease, are benefited from anti-angiogenes. In this paper, based on the clinical status and unsolved problems, combined with the latest clinical and translational research data, we reviewed the current anti-angiogenesis treatment of lung cancer.
.

Transformation from Small Cell to Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Thymic Carcinoma Patient with a Durable Response to Anlotinib: A Case Report

The most common pathologic type of thymic carcinoma (TC) is squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Small cell carcinoma is relatively rare, accounting for approximately 2% to 5% of all thymic tumors. Histologic transformation of TC has not yet been reported. Available treatments for TC patients who progress after first-line therapy are limited, which contributes to their poor prognosis. We reported an extraordinary case of a 66-year-old man who was diagnosed with thymic small cell carcinoma that transformed into SCC after third-line treatment. Surprisingly, the patient had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 25 months and an overall survival (OS) of 10 years on anlotinib as fourth-line therapy. The tolerance was well. Thus, anlotinib may be a safe and promising treatment for TC patients, especially those who undergo histologic transformation.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy May Be a Feasible Option for Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma

Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PPLELC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which there is currently no recognized treatment. Recently, favorable immune checkpoint blockade responses have been observed in PPLELC. This study aimed to review the effects of this regimen in patients with advanced PPLELC. PPLELC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at West China Hospital between January 2008 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified. Demographic parameters and antitumor treatment details were retrieved and reviewed. Among 128 patients diagnosed with PPLELC, 5 who received immune checkpoint inhibitors at advanced stages were included in the analysis. All of these patients were female nonsmokers with a median age of 55.6 (range 53-58) years at diagnosis. Their median PD-L1 expression was 40% (range, 30-80%). Although the patients underwent surgeries, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, all the treatments failed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were administered palliatively, and three patients responded favorably, with the best overall response being partial remission (PR). Thus, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a promising treatment for advanced PPLELC, and large clinical trials are warranted to obtain more evidence regarding this regimen.

Anlotinib as a post-third-line therapy for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

There is no standard treatment strategy for the third-line and above treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the effects of anlotinib in patients with NSCLC. Data was collected from a group of advanced lung cancer patients who received anlotinib as a third-line or post-third-line treatment between 2017 and 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the progression-free survival (PFS) of these lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Forest plot was used for subgroup analysis.Our study included 44 patients. Oral anlotinib was used as a third-line treatment to treat 26 patients, and as a fourth-line or multiline treatment in 18 patients. The objective control rate was 5%, the disease control rate was 89%, and the median PFS was 4.0 months with a 95% confidence interval. Common toxicities included anorexia, hypertension, and fatigue. Anlotinib demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated with controlled toxicity in patients with NSCLC.

In vitro studies of H520 cell cycle and apoptosis by anlotinib combined with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To study in vitro the effects of anlotinib combined with radiotherapy on the lung cancer H520 cell cycle and apoptosis.

METHODS

The log growth period H520 cells were divided into the control group, anlotinib group (A group), radiotherapy group (RT group) and combined group (A + RT group). Cell cycle and apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry and changes in H520 cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

Anlotinib was determined to significantly inhibit cell growth in all groups, both alone, or in combination with radiotherapy. After receiving corresponding treatments, the proportions of G2/M-phase cells in the control group, A group, RT group and A + RT group were different, and statistically significant (F = 32.086, P < 0.001). The apoptotic cell statistics of H520 cells in the control group, A group, RT group and A + RT group were significantly different (F = 44.537, P < 0.01). The relative expression of CDK1 in each group of cells was 0.04 ± 0.02, 0.07 ± 0.12, 0.81 ± 0.11, and 0.56 ± 0.16, respectively. There were differences between the groups by analysis of variance which were statistically significant (F = 58.36, P < 0.0001). The relative expression of cycle B in each group of cells was 0.27 ± 0.05, 0.40 ± 0.16, 0.65 ± 0.14, and 0.57 ± 0.13, respectively. There were differences between the groups by analysis of variance which were statistically significant (F = 10.77, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib had an inhibitory effect on lung cancer H520 cell proliferation. A higher rate of apoptosis and G2/M phase block was observed in the anlotinib-radiotherapy combined group. Anlotinib combined with radiotherapy was able to synergistically inhibit tumor cell growth.

KEY POINTS

Anrotinib combined with radiotherapy can synergistically inhibit tumor cell growth.

Effect of anlotinib as a third- or further-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with different histologic types: Subgroup analysis in the ALTER0303 trial

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib showed significant survival benefits in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as a third- or further-line treatment in the ALTER0303 trial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with different histologies.

METHODS

The ALTER0303 trial was a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of anlotinib in NSCLC patients previously treated with at least two lines of chemotherapy or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 31 centers in China. Patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive anlotinib (12 mg QD from days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle) or placebo until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We assessed the efficacy of anlotinib in histological subgroups in the full analysis set.

RESULTS

In the ALTER0303 trial, 336 patients had the histological subtype of adenocarcinoma (ACC), 86 patients had the histological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 15 patients had another subtype. In the ACC subgroup, the median OS time was significantly improved with anlotinib compared with placebo (9.6 months vs 6.9 months, P = .0051), as was the median progression-free survival (PFS) time (5.5 months vs 1.4 months, P < .0001). In the SCC subgroup, the median OS time was 10.7 months in the anlotinib group and 6.5 months in the placebo group (P = .2570), and the median PFS time was 4.8 months and 2.7 months (P = .0004), respectively. The common adverse events observed in the SCC and ACC subgroups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that anlotinib significantly improves PFS and OS in ACC patients and has a tendency to prolong survival in SCC patients.