Prognostic factors and treatment comparison in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix based on population analyses

A nomogram for predicting prognosis for young cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma: A SEER-based study and external validation

Background

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of cervical carcinomas with poor prognosis. NECC tends to occur in young age which could severely impair mental and physical health of young patients. Therefore, this study aims to develop an individualized prognostic nomogram for young NECC patients.

Methods

360 young (≤45 years old) NECC patients were retrospectively selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and were randomly located to a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a ratio of 7:3. Data from Fujian Cancer Hospital was used as an external validation cohort. Independent prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and a prognostic nomogram for young NECC was developed. The predictive accuracy and clinical utility of the nomogram were assessed by area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (timeROC) curve (AUC), the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Finally, a simplified scoring system for clinical use was constructed by dividing patients into high-risk and low-risk groups.

Results

Pathological type, FIGO stage, and surgery were independent risk factors by univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). The prognostic nomogram consisting of the above three independent risk factors had high accuracy. The AUC values of 5-year overall survival (OS) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts were 0.805, 0.798 and 0.872, respectively. The prognostic nomogram also presented with good C-index and calibration plots. The DCA curve further confirmed that the nomogram had a high clinical net benefit. According to the median prognostic index (median PI=18.6), all patients were categorized into high-risk group and low-risk group. The 5-year OS of the high-risk NECC group was significantly worse than that of the low-risk group among three cohorts (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Pathological type, FIGO stage, and surgery were identified as independent prognostic risk factors for young NECC patients. Based on the nomogram, gynecologic oncologists can accurately and easily predict the prognosis of young NECC and provide scientific guidance for individualized treatment.

Radiotherapy can improve overall survival in patients with lymph-node positive, high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer: construction of two prognostic nomograms to predict treatment outcome

Background

To explore the beneficial subgroups after radiotherapy in high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer (HGNECC) and construct two survival prognosis models to quantify the efficacy of radiotherapy assessment.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we included 592 eligible samples from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 56 patients with lymph-node positive HGNECC from Chongqing Medical University. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent survival prognosis risk factors for HGNECC patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed as it balances the baseline differences among grouping methods. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves were used to analyze survival differences among different groups. Two survival prediction nomograms were constructed separately (using the "rms" package in R software) based on whether radiotherapy was administered. The stability and accuracy of these models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves in both the training and validation datasets. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

Age, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)-stage, and treatment methods (surgery vs. chemotherapy) were independent risk factors that affected survival prognosis (P<0.05). Radiotherapy showed adverse effects on survival in patients with early tumor staging, lymph-node negative status, and absence of distant metastasis (all P<0.05). The lymph-node positive group had a beneficial response to radiotherapy (P<0.05), and patients with metastasis in the radiotherapy group showed a survival protection trend (P=0.069).

Conclusion

In HGNECC, patients with lymph-node positive status can benefit from radiotherapy in terms of survival outcomes. We constructed two survival prediction models based on whether radiotherapy was administered, thereby offering a more scientifically guided approach to clinical treatment planning by quantifying the radiotherapy efficacy.

Causes of death analysis and the prognostic model construction in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: A SEER-based study

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is rare but results in poor prognosis. The causes of death (CODs) in NECC patients are rarely reported. Our study aimed to explore the distributions of death causes of NECC patients compared with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) and to develop a validated survival prediction model.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with NECC, SCC, or ADC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database from 1975 to 2019. We analyzed the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) to determine each cause of death for each survival time category. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to establish a nomogram model.

RESULTS

A total of 358 NECC patients were included in this study, and 270 (75.4%) died during the follow-up period. Patients with NECC had 5.55 times (95% CI, 4.53-6.79, p < 0.0001) higher risk of death compared with patients with SCC and 10.38 times (95% CI, 8.28-13.01, p < 0.0001) higher compared with ADC. Cervical cancer is the main cause of death in NECC. As the diagnosis time increased, the risk of death from all causes and cervix cancer gradually decreased. While after at least 10 years of follow-up time, the highest and most dramatical SMR values were observed for metastasis (SMR, 138.81; 95% CI, 37.82-355.40; p < 0.05) and other cancers as the reason for death has an over 7-fold higher SMR (SMR: 7.07; 95% CI: 2.60-15.40, p < 0.05) more than 5 years after the cancer diagnosis. Race, FIGO stage, and surgery were independent risk factors for the overall survival (OS) of NECC patients. For the predictive nomogram, the C-index was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.697-0.725) and was corrected to 0.709 (95% CI: 0.680, 0.737) by bootstrap 1000 resampling validation.

CONCLUSION

Compared with SCC and ADC, NECC patients have an elevated risk of mortality due to cervical cancer and metastasis. We successfully constructed a prognostic nomogram for patients with NECC. Based on refractoriness and high mortality of NECC, targeted treatment strategies and follow-up plans should be further developed according to the risk of death and distribution characteristics of CODs.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a case report

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) of the cervix is an extremely rare but highly aggressive type of cervical cancer and it requires multimodal therapy to improve their quality of life. At present, there are no established, standardized treatment protocols for managing large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix. In this report, we present a case of a patient with cervical LCNEC, Who was a 39-year-old woman who presented with irregular vaginal bleeding accompanied by lower abdominal distension for over a month. Examination revealed a cauliflower-like cervical mass approximately 4cm in diameter, with the normal cervical architecture distorted and partially fused to the vaginal wall. Following further investigations, the stage assigned was IVB, and who was started on neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the TC (paclitaxel + carboplatin) regimen but during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, The patient developed a vaginal urinary leakage. Then, The patient underwent a comprehensive treatment regimen that included pelvic exenteration, urinary system reconstruction, pelvic floor reconstruction, and chemotherapy. Given the patient's positive immunohistochemistry for EGFR, the treatment was combined with the anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab. The patient achieved complete remission following the comprehensive treatment. Through this case to explore individualized treatment for cervical LCNEC.

Competing risk nomogram and risk classification system for evaluating overall and cancer-specific survival in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a population-based retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare malignancy with poor clinical prognosis due to limited therapeutic options. This study aimed to establish a risk-stratification score and nomogram models to predict prognosis in NECC patients.

METHODS

Data on individuals diagnosed with NECC between 2000 and 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and then randomly classified into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated independent indicators of prognosis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis further assisted in confirming candidate variables. Based on these factors, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) nomograms that predict survival over 1, 3, and 5 years were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the concordance index (C-index), and the calibration curve estimated the precision and discriminability of the competing risk nomogram for both cohorts. Finally, we assessed the clinical value of the nomograms using decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Data from 2348 patients were obtained from the SEER database. Age, tumor stage, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery predicted OS. Additionally, histological type was another standalone indicator of CSS prognosis. For predicting CSS, the C-index was 0.751 (95% CI 0.731 ~ 0.770) and 0.740 (95% CI 0.710 ~ 0.770) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the C-index in OS prediction was 0.757 (95% CI 0.738 ~ 0.776) and 0.747 (95% CI 0.718 ~ 0.776) for both cohorts. The proposed model had an excellent discriminative ability. Good accuracy and discriminability were also demonstrated using the AUC and calibration curves. Additionally, DCA demonstrated the high clinical potential of the nomograms for CSS and OS prediction. We constructed a corresponding risk classification system using nomogram scores. For the whole cohort, the median CSS times for the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 59.3, 19.5, and 7.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

New competing risk nomograms and a risk classification system were successfully developed to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS and OS of NECC patients. The models are internally accurate and reliable and may guide clinicians toward better clinical decisions and the development of personalized treatment plans.

Prognostic model for survival in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix: SEER database analysis and a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is extremely rare in clinical practice. This study aimed to methodologically analyze the clinicopathological factors associated with NECC patients and to develop a validated survival prediction model.

METHODS

A total of 535 patients diagnosed with NECC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, while 122 patients diagnosed with NECC at Yunnan Cancer Hospital (YCH) from 2006 to 2019 were also recruited. Patients from the SEER database were divided into a training cohort (n = 376) and a validation cohort (n = 159) in a 7:3 ratio for the construction and internal validation of the nomogram. External validation was performed in a cohort at YCH. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, the Log-rank method test was used for univariate analysis of prognostic influences, and the Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with NECC in SEER were 43.6% and 39.7%, respectively. In the training cohort, multivariate analysis showed independent prognostic factors for NECC patients including race, tumor size, distant metastasis, stage, and chemotherapy (p<0.05). For extended application in other cohorts, a nomogram including four factors without race was subsequently created. The consistency index (C-index) of the nomogram predicting survival was 0.736, which was well-validated in the validation cohorts (0.746 for the internal validation cohort and 0.765 for the external validation cohort). In both the training and validation cohorts, the 3-year survival rates predicted by the nomogram were comparable to the actual ones. We then succeeded in dividing patients with NECC into high- and low-risk groups concerning OS using the nomogram we developed. Besides, univariate analysis showed that chemotherapy ≥4 cycles may improve the OS of patients at YCH with NECC.

CONCLUSION

We successfully constructed a nomogram that precisely predicts the OS for patients with NECC based on the SEER database and a large single-center retrospective cohort. The visualized and practical model can distinguish high-risk patients for recurrence and death who may benefit from clinical trials of boost therapy effectively. We also found that patients who received more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy acquired survival benefits than those who received less than 4 cycles.

Paclitaxel-carboplatin plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective case series

AIM

There is no conclusive data on the prognosis of patients who receive paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the uterine cervix, a rare histological subtype of cervical cancer. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of TC chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and bevacizumab single maintenance therapy for advanced NEC of the cervix.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who received TC plus bevacizumab therapy for metastatic, recurrent, or persistent NEC of the cervix at seven institutions between 2015 and 2020. Relevant data were extracted from the patients' medical records and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven patients, including six with small-cell NEC and one with large-cell NEC, were included for analysis. Three patients received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy following TC plus bevacizumab therapy, whereas four patients did not receive bevacizumab single maintenance therapy. The median overall survival and progression-free survival of the patients who received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy were longer than those of the patients who did not receive the therapy (34 months vs. 10.5 months and 19 months vs. 5 months, respectively). However, the patients who received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy had received cisplatin-based chemotherapy previously.

CONCLUSIONS

On the premise that cisplatin-based chemotherapy is administered as the first-line treatment for advanced NEC of the cervix, bevacizumab single maintenance therapy following TC plus bevacizumab may be considered the second- or third-line treatment. However, the risk of adverse events, such as intestinal perforation, should be discussed with patients.

Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Cervix: A Case Series

Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are among the rarest and least studied histopathological types of cervical cancers, accounting for 1.4% of all cervical cancers. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix (NECCs) are aggressive tumors that can be associated with several high-risk features such as early lymphovascular invasion and multiple systemic metastases, at early stages. Here, we present a case series of five patients with NECC who have been diagnosed and managed at a tertiary care hospital in coastal Andhra Pradesh, South India. Using the hospital records, we made a list of patients with NECC who were diagnosed by histopathological findings between 2019 and 2022. Details regarding their demographic variables, presenting complaints, staging, and treatment given were noted down using a pre-defined proforma.

Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix

Objectives

This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and outcome of patients suffering from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix (NECCs).

Methods

This retrospective study included 83 patients with NECCs, who had undergone pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between November 2002 and June 2019. The median follow-up period was 50.7 months. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually by two radiologists. ADC values in the lesions were calculated using the Functool software. These values were compared between different clinicopathological parameters groups. The Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to forecast survival rates. Prognostic factors were decided by the Cox regression method.

Results

In the cohort of 83 patients, nine, 42, 23, and nine patients were in stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. ADCmean, ADCmax, and ADCmin were greatly lower in stage IIB–IVB than in stage I–IIA tumours, as well as in tumours measuring ≥ 4 cm than in those < 4 cm. ADCmean, FIGO stage, and age at dianosis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year overall survival (OS). ADCmin, FIGO stage, age at diagnosis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. For surgically treated patients (n = 45), ADCmax was an independent prognostic parameter for both 5-year OS and 5-year PFS.

Conclusions

ADCmean, ADCmin, and ADCmax are independent prognostic factors for NECCs. ADC analysis could be useful in predicting the survival outcomes in patients with NECCs.

A Nomogram Model Based on Neuroendocrine Markers for Predicting the Prognosis of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Cervix

BACKGROUND

Combining traditional clinical parameters with neuroendocrine markers to construct a nomogram model to predict the postoperative recurrence of neuroendocrine carcinoma of cervix (NECC).

METHODS

A total of 257 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to establish a nomogram model in the training cohorts, which was further validated in the validation cohorts. The calibration curve was used to conduct the internal and external verification of the model.

RESULTS

Overall, 41 relapse cases were observed in the training (23 cases) and validation (18 cases) cohorts. The univariate analysis preliminarily showed that FIGO stage, stromal invasion, nerve invasion, lymph vascular space invasion, lymph node involvement, cervical-uterine junction invasion and CgA were correlated with NECC recurrence. The multivariate analysis further confirmed that FIGO stage (p = 0.023), stromal invasion (p = 0.002), lymph vascular space invasion (p = 0.039) and lymph node involvement (p = 0.00) were independent risk factors for NECC recurrence, which were ultimately included in the nomogram model. In addition, superior consistency indices were demonstrated in the training (0.863, 95% CI 0.784-0.942) and validation (0.884, 95% CI 0.758-1.010) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The established nomogram model combining traditional clinical parameters with neuroendocrine markers can reliably and accurately predict the recurrence risks in NECC patients.

Real-world Efficacy Data on Anti-Angiogenic Drugs in Recurrent Small Cell Cervical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is rare but extremely aggressive and resistant to current therapies. We herein evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab, apatinib, and anlotinib in recurrent/metastatic SCCC patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Recurrent/metastatic SCCC patients were recruited between January 2013 and July 2020. Baseline characteristics were extracted from medical records, and patients were divided into an anti-angiogenic group and non-anti-angiogenic group. The efficacy of treatments was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients received anti-angiogenic drugs after tumor recurrence/metastasis; of them, 10 cases received them as first-line treatment, 5 cases as second-line treatment, and 1 case as fourth-line treatment. Another 23 patients received traditional therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The use of anti-angiogenic drugs in first-line treatment significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the controls, with a median PFS of 8 months (2-20 months) and 3 months (1-10 months), respectively (P = .025). This trend was also notable in patients who started anti-angiogenic treatment after the second-line recurrence/metastasis. However, there was no benefits for overall survival (OS) in either the 10 first-line cases or all 16 cases (P = .499 and .31, respectively). Both bevacizumab and small molecule drugs (apatinib and anlotinib) presented similar efficacy in SCCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, this is the largest cohort study that provides real-world data, showing that anti-angiogenic regimens could significantly prolong PFS in recurrent/metastatic SCCC. Aside from bevacizumab, the novel oral small molecule drugs provide more choices with similar efficacy. These findings warrant further validation in well-designed future studies.

Exploring a Better Adjuvant Treatment for Surgically Treated High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore a better adjuvant treatment for patients with high-grade (HG) neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas (NECC) who had undergone surgery as a primary treatment.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study, which involved women diagnosed as HG-NECC, was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. All patients had undergone radical surgery and pelvic lymphadenectomy with a laparotomy or a minimally invasive surgery. An analysis was made of the prognosis of HG-NECC.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method to be compared via log-rank tests. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A number of 110 patients diagnosed as HG-NECC at the pathological stage IA2 to IIIC2 according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system were initially treated with a primary surgery between 2008 and 2020. The eligible patients had the median age of 42.5 years (range: 22-76), with the median follow-up period of 39.6 months (range: 1.0-156.6). The 5-year OS of the patients at pathological stage I, II, and III accounted for 84.9%, 85.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed no significant differences in OS and PFS between postoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone (OS: p = 0.77; PFS: p = 0.41). Etoposide plus platinum therapy did not improve OS when compared with platinum plus paclitaxel therapy after surgery (p = 0.71). The univariable analysis showed that chemotherapy with cycles ≥4 presented a better prognosis than with cycles <4 (OS: p = 0.01; HR = 6.71; PFS: p = 0.02; HR = 5.18). The multivariate analysis indicated that the cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.02; HR 0.29) were a prognostic factor for PFS.

LIMITATIONS

A retrospective design and the absence of partial follow-up data are limitations of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In initially surgically treated HG-NECC, postoperative chemotherapy alone showed no inferiority when compared with chemoradiotherapy for HG-NECC, and 4+ cycles of chemotherapy tended to produce a better prognosis than 4-ones.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with cervical cancer

Objective

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the main causes of death among gynecological malignancies. Patients with CC with lymph node metastasis (LNM) have poor prognoses. We investigated the risk factors and prognosis of LNM in patients with CC patients using data from the SEER database.

Methods

We collected the information of cervical cancer patients registered in SEER database from 2010 to 2015. The dataset was divided into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. LASSO regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for LNM in patients with CC. Using the results, we established a nomogram prediction model. C-index, ROC curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curves were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the model.

Results

We included 14,356 patients with CC in the analysis. Among these, 3997 patients were diagnosed with LNM. A training set (10,050 cases) and a validation set (4306 cases) were used for the following analysis. We established nomogram LNM prediction models for the patients with T_1-2-stage CC. The C-indices for the internal and external validations of the prediction models were 0.758 and 0.744, respectively. In addition, we established a prognostic nomogram for all CC patients with LNM, and the internal and external validation C-indices were 0.763 and 0.737.

Conclusion

We constructed a quantitative and visual predictive nomogram that predicted prognosis of patients with LNM in CC to provide clinicians with a reference for diagnosis and treatment.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gynecologic Tract

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine refers to the cells that synthesize and secrete messenger chemicals such as neuropeptides and amines. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are aggressive tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, with an annual incidence of 6.98/100,000 and a prevalence of 170,000 in the United States. Primary gynecologic NENs constitute ≤2% of female reproductive tumors. NENs of the gynecologic tract are associated with high recurrence rates and dismal prognosis, making their treatment challenging. This article focuses on the updated staging classifications, clinicopathological characteristics, imaging, and management of NENs of the gynecological tract.

Abstract

Gynecological tract neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare, aggressive tumors from endocrine cells derived from the neuroectoderm, neural crest, and endoderm. The primary gynecologic NENs constitute 2% of gynecologic malignancies, and the cervix is the most common site of NEN in the gynecologic tract. The updated WHO classification of gynecologic NEN is based on the Ki-67 index, mitotic index, and tumor characteristics such as necrosis, and brings more uniformity in the terminology of NENs like other disease sites. Imaging plays a crucial role in the staging, triaging, restaging, and surveillance of NENs. The expression of the somatostatin receptors on the surface of neuroendocrine cells forms the basis of increasing evaluation with functional imaging modalities using traditional and new tracers, including ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Somatostatin Analog-PET/CT. Management of NENs involves a multidisciplinary approach. New targeted therapies could improve the paradigm of care for these rare malignancies. This article focuses on the updated staging classifications, clinicopathological characteristics, imaging, and management of gynecologic NENs of the cervix, ovary, endometrium, vagina, and vulva, emphasizing the relatively common cervical neuroendocrine carcinomas among these entities.

Development and Validation of Novel Nomograms to Predict the Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients With Lymph Node Metastasis

Objective

The objective of this study was to establish and validate novel individualized nomograms for predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.

Methods

A total of 2,956 cervical cancer patients diagnosed with lymph node metastasis (American Joint Committee on Cancer, AJCC N stage=N1) between 2000 and 2018 were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to identify independent prognostic predictors, and the nomograms were established to predict the OS and CSS. The concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to estimate the precision and discriminability of the nomograms. Decision-curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical utility of the nomograms.

Results

Tumor size, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), radiotherapy, surgery, T stage, histology, and grade resulted as significant independent predictors both for OS and CSS. The C-index value of the prognostic nomogram for predicting OS was 0.788 (95% CI, 0.762–0.814) and 0.777 (95% CI, 0.758–0.796) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Meanwhile, the C-index value of the prognostic nomogram for predicting CSS was 0.792 (95% CI, 0.767–0.817) and 0.781 (95% CI, 0.764–0.798) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves for the nomograms revealed gratifying consistency between predictions and actual observations for both 3- and 5-year OS and CSS. The 3- and 5-year area under the curves (AUCs) for the nomogram of OS and CSS ranged from 0.781 to 0.828. Finally, the DCA curves emerged as robust positive net benefits across a wide scale of threshold probabilities.

Conclusion

We have successfully constructed nomograms that could predict 3- and 5-year OS and CSS of cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis and may assist clinicians in decision-making and personalized treatment planning.

Distant organ metastasis patterns and prognosis of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a population-based retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare pathological form of cervical cancer. The prognosis of NECC with distant organ metastases is unclear. In our study, the patterns and prognosis of distant organ metastasis of NECC were investigated.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2018. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

NECC was prone to single and multi-site metastases. The median overall survival (OS) was greatly decreased in patients with distant metastasis (P < 0.0001). Other characteristics such as age ≥60 years, poorer grade, higher T stage, those without surgery, no radiotherapy, and no chemotherapy were predictors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for patients with NECC. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy give an overall survival advantage for patients with distant organ metastases.

A Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A SEER Population-Based Study

Background: This study aimed to develop a prognostic model based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to predict the overall survival (OS) of small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SmCC). Methods: Between 1975 and 2016, a total of 401 patients were included, and their comprehensive sociodemographic and clinicopathological characteristics were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to screen for independent prognostic factors. The identified factors were used to conduct a nomogram for predicting the OS of SmCC. The performance of the nomogram was determined using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) metrics. Results: The median survival time of all patients was about 24 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] [1.50-2.17]). Age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.693 for 45-59 vs 21-34, 95% CI [1.140-2.513], P = .009; HR = 2.836 for 60-92 vs 21-34, 95% CI [1.851-4.345], P < .001), positive nodes (HR = 2.384, 95% CI [1.437-3.955], P < .001), regional nodes number ≥12 (HR = 0.500, 95% CI [0.282-0.886], P = .018), and treatment method (HR = 0.409 for surgery vs no, 95% CI [0.267-0.628], P < .001; HR = 0.649 for chemotherapy vs no, 95% CI [0.478-0.881)], P = .006) were independent factors of OS. Young patients who had surgical resection or chemotherapy, negative lymph nodes, and regional lymph nodes ≥12 had a longer survival time. These clinical factors were utilized to construct a nomogram for predicting OS. The AUC and C-index were higher than 0.7, indicating the good discriminating ability of the nomogram. The calibrations were all around the 45-degree line, indicating excellent consistency between the prediction of the model and actual observations. The DCA plots supported the clinical utility of the nomogram. Conclusion: The constructed nomogram is expected to help predict the prognosis of SmCC and guide patient treatment.

Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT in Patients With Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

PURPOSE

We evaluated the prognostic value of metabolic parameters measured on pretreatment FDG PET/CT in patients with cervical neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs).

METHODS

A total of 22 patients with cervical NECs who underwent pretreatment FDG PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. The SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary lesion were measured. The associations between prognostic factors and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients, 12 developed disease progression, and 5 died during the follow-up period. Univariate analyses revealed that MTV, TLG, and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage were significantly associated with PFS (all P < 0.05), whereas SUVmax did not show a significant correlation with PFS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with MTV >31.9 cm3 (log-rank, P < 0.001), TLG >154.3 (log-rank, P < 0.001), and higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (log-rank, P = 0.026) had significantly shorter PFS. In the multivariate analyses, MTV (P = 0.017; hazard ratio [HR], 7.298; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.427-37.316) and TLG (P = 0.003; HR, 15.175; 95% CI, 2.470-93.244) were independent prognostic factors, whereas for OS, the univariate analysis revealed that only TLG >154.3 showed statistical significance (P = 0.043; HR, 9.821; 95% CI, 1.080-89.290).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic tumor volume and TLG on FDG PET/CT were the significant prognostic factors of PFS in patients with cervical NECs. Patients with high MTV and TLG had worse clinical outcomes. In addition, TLG may also be a predictor of OS.

A real-world, population-based study of the trends for incidence and prognosis in high-grade neuroendocrine tumor of cervix

To explore the incidence and prognosis trends for high-grade cervical neuroendocrine tumor (HGCNET) and construct a nomogram to predict prognosis for HGCNET. Annual age-adjusted incidence of HGCNET from 1975 to 2015 was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, the linear regression, poisson regression and annual percentage changes were used to assess the incidence trend. Also, trends for relative survival (RS) and overall survival (OS) in HGCNET patients from 1975 to 2015 were evaluated. From 1988 to 1975, 514 HGCNET patients were selected and divided into two cohorts with a ratio of 7:3. Nomogram to predict OS for these patients was constructed and validated. The incidence trend for HGCNET was unchanged in the past four decades (P = 0.734), but the proportion of HGCNET in diagnosed cervical cancer slightly increased from 0.9% in 1975 to 1.9% in 2015 (P < 0.001). The 5-year RS and OS for HGCNET in the study periods decreased steadily (RS: P = 0.009; OS: P = 0.008). Nomogram incorporating age, T stage, lymph-node positive, distant metastasis and surgery was constructed. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.716 (0.680-0.752), which was higher than the FIGO staging system. The incidence of HGCNET remained unchanged in the past four decades but the proportion of HGCNET has slightly increased. Besides, a steadily decreasing survival for HGCNET was observed in the study periods. A nomogram was constructed to better predict prognosis for HGCNET.

Small cell carcinoma as an independent prognostic factor for cervical cancer patients: a population-based analysis

Aim: To compare cervical small cell carcinoma (SmCC) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patient characteristics and survival outcomes. Methods: Cervical SmCC and SCC patients in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015 were enrolled. Propensity-score matching analysis (PSM) paired subjects with similar background variables. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and stratified analyses were conducted before and after PSM. Results: Cervical SmCC patients showed a higher rate of larger tumor size, advanced grade disease, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). Before and after PSM, SmCC histology and advanced Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (p < 0.001) were principal prognostic factors of survival, and cervical SmCC was associated with worse survival in all stages (stage I-IV). Conclusion: SmCC was an independent poor prognostic factor in cervical cancer patients.

Small Cell Neuroendocrine Cervical Carcinoma: A Case Report

Objective: Small cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma is a neuroendocrine tumor with the great aggravation that comprises 0.5 to 3 percent of cervical tumors and progresses rapidly with early lymphogenous and hematogenous metastases. Case report: We reported a 40 years old woman with cervical cancer in stage IB2 that had radical hysterectomy with mistaken diagnosis of squamous cervical cancer. The disease has progressed after 50 days of surgery with a 6 cm tumor in vaginal cuff; review of pathology demonstrated small cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma. Conclusion: Recognition of this separate histopathological entity with IHC analysis is important. Chemoradiotherapy and multimodality therapeutic approaches could improve the survival rates.

Prognostic factors and treatment comparison in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix based on population analyses

Objective

We aimed to assess the impact of the treatment modality on the outcome of small cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (SCNEC) using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

Patients from the SEER program between 1981 and 2014 were identified. Significant factors for cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier survival and Cox regression methods.

Results

A total of 503 SCNEC patients were identified. The 5‐year CSS and OS were 36.6% and 30.6%, respectively. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I to IV distributions was 189 (37.6%), 108 (21.5%), 95 (18.9%), and 111 patients (22.0%), respectively. Within the patients with known treatment strategies, 177 (45.9%) were treated with radical surgery and 209 (54.1%) underwent primary radiotherapy. Local treatment strategies were independent prognostic factor for CSS and OS. The 5‐year CSS for radical surgery and primary radiotherapy was 50.0% and 27.9%, respectively (P < .001). The 5‐year OS for those who received radical surgery and primary radiotherapy was 57.8%, and 29.6%, respectively (P < .001). In FIGO stage I SCNEC, patients treated with radical surgery had superior CSS (P = .001) and OS (P = .003) than those with primary radiotherapy. However, in FIGO stage II and III SCNEC, there were no differences in CSS and OS with respect to different local treatment strategies. Our results also found that the addition of brachytherapy impacted OS in the FIGO stage III SENCE (P = .002). The 5‐year CSS and OS of patients with FIGO IV were only 11.7% and 7.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

SCNEC is a rare disease with aggressive clinical behavior. The findings indicate that radical surgery should be suggested for early‐stage SCNEC and combining radiation therapy with brachytherapy should be suitable for patients with advanced stage.