Systemic therapies in advanced epithelioid haemangioendothelioma: A retrospective international case series from the World Sarcoma Network and a review of literature

Clinician's primer for soft tissue sarcomas: Nuances of histologic subtypes

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare group of mesenchymal malignancies, with greater than 100 histologic subtypes. Advancements in understanding these subtypes has enabled histology-tailored management. This primer describes the workup and management of generalized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity, trunk, and retroperitoneum while also highlighting the unique attributes of many subtypes. The subtypes chosen for review include those that are most common as well as those demonstrating unique behaviors or targets for management. The focus is on initial management of localized disease; however, for situations in which novel systemic agents have been discovered, the treatment of metastatic disease is discussed. This report is a reference to be used in addition to other comprehensive reviews, such as guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology. It is not a substitute for referral to an expert sarcoma center for critical pathology review and management by an experienced team. Importantly, patients who are treated at expert sarcoma centers have better outcomes than those who are not.

The challenges of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: the diagnosis and current treatments of a problematic tumor

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a malignant vascular tumor known for its rarity. The different types of this hepatic tumor (single, multiple-nodular or diffused) indicate different prognosis and treatment plans. However, the heterogenic clinical manifestation creates a dilemma and a wide range of challenges when attending to HEHE patients. This review addresses the unique profile and clinical challenges that complicate the diagnosis and treatment of HEHE while focusing on current therapeutic strategies and their limitations.

MAIN TEXT

The unclear etiology is a challenging feature of HEHE. The exact involvement of potential risk factors and mechanism of development are still undefined. Relevant genetic alterations like WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion have been investigated; however, they are only applicable as diagnostic markers and their influence on therapeutic efficacy is largely unknown. Other characteristics include asymptomatic manifestation, lack of unique hepatic functional alterations, high rates of misdiagnosis and late-stage identification when metastases already exist. Currently, tissue biopsy is the main tool to establish a definite diagnosis but is challenged with the limited awareness to suspect HEHE at early stages and the lack of relevant guidelines due to the rarity and the insufficiency of relevant research. The absence of treatment guidelines is the greatest challenge of HEHE. Generally, Surgical approaches are recommended due to the benefits of prolonged survival and enhanced prognosis. Nonetheless, only a minority of patients are eligible for resections while liver transplants are faced with severe insufficiency of donor organs and long wait-lists. On the other hand, a variety of non-surgical treatments (like anti-angiogenic agents, interferon alpha-2B and sirolimus) are presented with a promising potential. However, relevant studies are challenged with limited sample-sizes and lack of prospective designs.

CONCLUSION

Regardless to decades passing since its discovery, HEHE still creates a dilemma due to its challenging clinical profile and lack of treatment guidelines. Raising awareness of HEHE in clinical practices improves the ability to diagnose this rare tumor at early stages and develop stronger research strategies and treatment guidelines to regulate the medical care provided to HEHE patients.

Comprehensive evaluation of clinical outcomes in hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma subsets: insights from SEER Database and departmental cohort analysis

Background

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE), is an uncommon, intermediate-grade malignant vascular tumor that can manifest in diverse organs, including the liver, lungs, and bones. Given its unique malignancy profile and rarity, there lacks a consensus on a standardized treatment protocol for EHE, particularly for hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE). This study aims to elucidate factors influencing the clinical prognosis of EHE by analyzing data from the SEER database, complemented with insights from a departmental cohort of 9 HEHE cases. Through this, we hope to shed light on potential clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies for HEHE.

Methods

Using SEER data from 22 registries, we analyzed 313 liver cancer patients with ICD-O-3 9130 and 9133 histology. Twelve variables were examined using Cox regression and mlr3 machine learning. Significant variables were identified and compared. Clinical data, imaging characteristics, and treatment methods of nine patients from our cohort were also presented.

Result

In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, Age, Sex, Year of diagnosis, Surgery of primary site, Chemotherapy, and Median household income were closely related to survival outcomes. Among the ten survival-related machine learning models, CoxPH, Flexible, Mboost, and Gamboost stood out based on Area Under the Curve(AUC), Decision Curve Analysis(DCA), and Calibration Curve Metrics. In the feature importance analysis of these four selected models, Age and Surgery of primary site were consistently identified as the most critical factors influencing prognosis. Additionally, the clinical data of nine patients from our cohort not only demonstrated unique imaging characteristics of HEHE but also underscored the importance of surgical intervention.

Conclusion

For patients with resectable HEHE, surgical treatment is currently a highly important therapeutic approach.

Long-term prognosis and treatment modalities of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective study of 228 patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an extremely rare tumour. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term prognosis and its relationship with treatment modalities.

METHODS

From March 2014 to June 2024, a total of 234 patients with histologically confirmed hepatic EHE were treated or followed up regularly by our team. The patients' clinical data at the time of diagnosis and initial treatment modalities were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to determine overall survival (OS). To explore prognostic factors and treatment outcomes, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were developed.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were ultimately included. The median age of the cohort was 41 years. For all patients, the OS of 1-, 3- and 5-year were 96.2%, 87.9% and 84.9%, respectively. For patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT), the OS of 1- and 3-year were 62.5% and 25%, respectively. No difference was found in the OS between patients who received surgical therapy and those who did not (1-year: 100% vs. 96.9%; 3-year: 90.1% vs. 91.5%; 5-year: 87.2% vs. 88.2%; P = 0.891). In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 60 years [HR (95% CI): 4.207 (1.266-13.973), P = 0.019], the size of the largest lesion > 10 cm [HR (95% CI): 12.140 (1.419-103.872), P = 0.023] and LT [HR (95% CI): 5.502 (1.343-22.536), P = 0.018] were poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nonsurgical therapy, surgical therapy has no advantage in terms of long-term survival. The role of LT in the management of hepatic EHE should be reevaluated. Age ≥ 60 years and the size of the largest lesion > 10 cm are poor prognostic factors.

Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an uncommon vascular neoplasm characterized by variable clinical behavior. Our aim was to describe the therapeutic approach for HEHE at diagnosis and define clinicopathological characteristics associated with tumor progression and long-term survival.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that includes patients with HEHE who received treatment at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1984 and 2023.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included in the study (median age: 44 years; 62.5% female), 24 underwent liver transplantation, 26 underwent liver resection, and 30 were managed medically. The 3-year overall survival rates were 86.7%, 80.9%, and 51.1%, respectively. Notably, 26 patients had extrahepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis, four (16.7%) in the transplantation group, four (15.4%) in the resection group, and 18 (69.2%) in the nonsurgical group. On multivariable modeling, bone metastasis was independently associated with long-term mortality (HR 6.3, p < 0.001) while lung metastasis and surgical intervention were not associated with long-term mortality (HR 0.8, p = 0.8; HR 1.1, p = 0.9, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Bone metastasis emerged as a strong predictor of poor survival. Hence, aggressive surgical intervention may not be advantageous in patients with skeletal metastases but can still be offered for those with other extrahepatic metastases.

The observational EURACAN prospective clinical registry dedicated to epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: The protocol of an international and collaborative effort on an ultra-rare entity

INTRODUCTION

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare sarcoma, marked by distinctive molecular and pathological features and with a variable clinical behavior. Its natural history is still partially understood, reliable prognostic and predictive factors are lacking and many questions are still open on the optimal management. In the context of EURACAN, a prospective registry specifically dedicated to EHE was developed and launched with the aim of providing, through high-quality prospective data collection, a better understanding of this disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Registry-based cohort study including only new cases of patients with a pathological and molecularly confirmed diagnosis of EHE.

OBJECTIVES

To improve the understanding of EHE natural history, validate and identify new prognostic and predictive factors, clarify the activity and efficacy of currently available treatment options, describe treatment pattern.

METHODS

Settings and participantsIt is an hospital-based registry established in centers with expertise in EHE including adult patients with a new pathological and molecularly confirmed diagnosis of EHE starting from the 1st December 2023. The characteristics of each patient in the facility who meets the above-mentioned inclusion criteria will be collected prospectively and longitudinally with follow-up at cancer progression and / or cancer relapse or patient death. It is a secondary use of data which will be collected from the clinical records. The data collected for the registry will not entail further examinations or admissions to the facility and/or additional appointments to those normally provided for routine patient follow-up. VariablesFull details on patients and disease features, treatment and outcome will be collected, according to common clinical practice guidelines developed and shared with all the contributing centers. In addition, data on potential confounders (e.g. comorbidity; functional status etc.) will also be collected. Statistical methodsThe data analyses will include descriptive statistics and analytical analyses. Multivariable Cox's proportional hazards model and Hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause or cause-specific mortality will be used to determine independent predictors of overall survival, recurrence and progression.

RESULTS

The registry has been joined by 21 sarcoma reference centers across EU and UK, covering 10 countries. Patients' recruitment started in December 2023. The estimated completion date is December 2033 upon agreement on the achievement of all the registry objectives. The already established collaboration and participation of EHE patient's associations involved in the project will help in promoting the registry and fostering accrual.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma-its history, clinical features, molecular biology and current therapy

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a remarkably rare tumor arising from endothelial cells that is classified as a vascular tumor in the WHO classification. The tumor is predominantly characterized by the presence of fusion genes, such as WWTR1-CAMTA1 or YAP1-TFE3, with a minority of cases exhibiting other rare fusion genes. EHE exhibits a broad age of onset, typically presenting at ~50 years, but it is not uncommon in pediatric populations. It manifests in a variety of organs, including the liver, lung, soft tissue and bone. Initial multiple-organ involvement is also observed. The tumor's biological behavior and prognosis vary substantially based on the primary site of manifestation. From a therapeutic perspective, initial active surveillance might be considered in selected cases, although surgical intervention remains the mainstay of treatment, especially for localized single-organ involvement. Chemotherapy is administered to patients with progressive unresectable tumors. Recent advances in the biological analysis of EHE fusion genes have elucidated their diverse functions. Additionally, next-generation sequencing has facilitated the identification of other mutations beyond the fusion genes. These continuous efforts to understand the biology of the fusion genes themselves and/or the dysregulated signaling by fusion genes are expected to lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for EHE. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of EHE, encompassing its historical context, clinical manifestations, molecular biology and the current state of treatment.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Focal Liver Lesions

Focal liver lesions (FLLs) have become an increasingly common finding on abdominal imaging, especially asymptomatic and incidental liver lesions. Gastroenterologists and hepatologists often see these patients in consultation and make recommendations for management of multiple types of liver lesions, including hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, and hepatic cystic lesions including polycystic liver disease. Malignancy is important to consider in the differential diagnosis of FLLs, and healthcare providers must be familiar with the diagnosis and management of FLLs. This American College of Gastroenterology practice guideline uses the best evidence available to make diagnosis and management recommendations for the most common FLLs.

A Young Female with a Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

Background

Primary hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an extremely rare tumour of vascular origin with an incidence of <0.1 cases per 100,000 people worldwide.

Case description

A 29-year-old female with the history of epigastric pain and unintentional weight loss (3 kg over six months) was referred for upper endoscopy. The examination was without visual pathological findings, but a rapid urease test was positive. First-line treatment with clarithromycin-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection was given. After completion of eradication therapy, diffuse abdominal pain developed. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed multiple liver nodules. Three consecutive core liver biopsies were performed and were inconclusive. A subsequent surgical liver nodule resection was performed. Histopathology of the specimen revealed grade 2 hepatocellular carcinoma; bone scintigraphy was negative for metastasis. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) recommended giving the patient sorafenib, which was poorly tolerated. The histology was reviewed using immunohistochemistry staining at the request of the oncologist, which showed expression of CD31 and CD34. Based on clinical, morphological and immunohistochemistry findings, a diagnosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma was made. Based on the multidisciplinary team's findings, liver transplantation was indicated as the only curative treatment.

Conclusion

Because of the rarity of this disease, combining clinical, radiological and histopathological methods as well as an MDT approach can help to reach the correct final diagnosis. As demonstrated in this clinical case, it is crucial to perform immunohistochemistry of a liver biopsy to confirm a HEHE diagnosis.

LEARNING POINTS

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular tumour that is often misdiagnosed and mismanaged.This case emphasises the critical importance of interdisciplinary teamwork and the use of non-invasive and invasive techniques to achieve a definitive diagnosis.

Metastatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma of the Bone: A Case Report and Literature Review

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an extremely rare vascular tumor, which can pose a diagnostic dilemma. It affects women more than men and is mainly found in the liver, lung, and bone. To date, there are no known predisposing factors. Limited data are available on the management of EHE at metastatic stages. The only optimal treatments to prevent metastatic dissemination are surgical resection and amputation in addition to radiotherapy at early stages. The oncologist in this rare entity plays an important role in the guided and standardized management of this disease, especially for advanced stages. In this article, we report the case of a 74-year-old patient admitted with swelling on the outer aspect of the right calf associated with pain and total functional impairment of the limb. The diagnosis favored a high-risk vascular tumor resembling EHE, confirmed by bone (tibia) and soft tissue biopsy. The patient underwent staging investigations, revealing diffuse metastases to the liver, bones, and lungs. The objective of this article is to advocate for oncological intervention in this entity, particularly in the advanced stages of the disease. Despite its rarity, the advancement of clinical trials and therapeutic recommendations remains crucial for optimal treatment.

A case of primary pleural epithelioid hemangioendothelioma achieving stable disease with paclitaxel treatment: A case report and literature review

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular neoplasm with a clinical behaviour that falls between a benign hemangioma and a high-grade angiosarcoma. Pleural EHE is exceptionally rare, and its prognosis is grim, with most patients experiencing survival of less than 1 year. Here, we present a case of pleural EHE in a 45-year-old woman with a month-long history of right-sided pleuritic chest pain. Chest computed tomography revealed consolidation, atelectasis of the right lung, right pleural thickening, and pleural effusion. She underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for decortication and was diagnosed with conclusively pleural EHE, showing a CAMTA1 rearrangement. Paclitaxel treatment, administered once weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, resulted in a stable disease after 12 cycles. Managing patients with pleural EHE is challenging because there are still no established standard treatments. Our case achieved 11-month progression-free survival following paclitaxel treatment.

Primary vascular tumors of bone: A comprehensive literature review on classification, diagnosis and treatment

Primary vascular tumors of bone are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, ranging from benign hemangiomas to frankly malignant epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas and angiosarcomas. Over the years, their classification has been a matter of discussion, due to morphologic similarities and uncertainty regarding biologic behavior. Over the past decade, with the development of next-generation sequencing, there has been a significant improvement in the molecular characterization of these lesions. The integration of their morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features has led to a better stratification, with important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Nevertheless, primary vascular bone tumors still represent a challenge for medical oncologists. Given their rarity and heterogeneity, in the last few years, there has been no significant progress in medical treatment options, so further research is needed. Here we present a review of the current knowledge regarding primary vascular tumors of the bone, correlating clinicopathologic features with tumor behavior and therapeutic approaches.

The patient perspective on sirolimus for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE): results of a community survey highlighting the importance of equitable access to treatments

Background

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, vascular sarcoma with clinical presentation ranging from an indolent to an aggressive form. Over 50% of patients present with metastatic disease, requiring systemic therapy, although no systemic therapies are specifically approved for EHE. Retrospective evidence supports the activity of mTOR inhibitors (e.g. sirolimus), although available only off-label. EHE patients and advocates are therefore working to support approval of effective treatments by collecting data on patient perspectives and experiences.

Materials and methods

In February 2023, the EHE Rare Cancer Charity (UK) and The EHE Foundation (US), with other advocates, conducted a survey of perspectives and experiences of EHE patients regarding the use and accessibility of sirolimus. The survey consisted of 20 questions designed for individuals undergoing treatment, those who had been treated, or had never been treated with the drug. Widely promoted within the patient community, the online survey categorized patients into three cohorts for the analysis: liver transplant patients, non-transplant patients who had ever taken sirolimus and sirolimus-naïve non-transplant patients.

Results

The survey evaluated data from 129 patient responses from 21 countries, mostly from USA, UK, Australia, and Canada (70%). The liver transplant, sirolimus and non-sirolimus cohorts were 16%, 25% and 59%, respectively. In the sirolimus group 66% reported treatment durations exceeding one year, with 16% exceeding five years, indicating the drug's efficacy. In the non-sirolimus group, the drug was not available for 42% and for 11% sirolimus was available but not selected for treatment because of its off-label status. Overall, 87% of all patients across all cohorts expressed the importance of the drug's availability as hugely or very important.

Conclusion

The survey responses highlight the activity of sirolimus for EHE and the importance of securing a label extension for the drug delivering equitable access to this treatment for patients.

Short-term outcomes of combined therapy with sirolimus and interferon-alpha 2b for advanced hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Background

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an extremely rare tumor, and no standard therapy has been established yet.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term results of combined therapy with sirolimus and interferon-alpha 2b (IFN-a 2b) (SI therapy).

Methods

From January 2022 to April 2023, 40 patients histologically diagnosed with hepatic EHE and progressive disease received SI therapy. All patients were regularly evaluated for the safety and efficacy of the SI therapy. Patients who received SI therapy for <3 months without a tumor status evaluation after treatment were excluded.

Results

Twenty-nine patients with hepatic EHE were included in this study. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 in 19 (65.5%) patients and 1 in 10 (34.5%) patients. The median duration of the SI therapy was 8 months (range, 3-15 months). Twenty-three (79.3%) patients showed a decrease in tumor size, including 11 (37.9%) patients who achieved a partial response and one (3.4%) who achieved a complete response; the objective response rate was 41.4%. Stable disease was observed in 13 (44.8%) patients, with a disease control rate of 86.2%. Adverse events (AES) were observed in 18 patients, including leukopenia (31.0%), oral ulcers (13.8%), and liver injury (10.3%). No severe (grade ⩾ 3) AEs were recorded, and SI therapy was not interrupted for any patient due to AEs.

Conclusion

Sirolimus and IFN-a 2b may have synergistic effects in the treatment of hepatic EHE. SI therapy is a safe and effective treatment for hepatic EHE patients with good ECOG performance status.

Epithelioid hemangio-endothelioma (EHE) in NETSARC: The nationwide series of 267 patients over 12 years

EPITHELIOID HEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA

A NATIONWIDE STUDY: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultrarare sarcoma whose natural history and treatment is not well defined. We report on the presentation and outcome of 267 patients with EHE in the NETSARC+ network since 2010 in France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centres with specialised multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTB), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (NCI), Institut National du Cancer (INCA). Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics are collected in a nationwide database regularly monitored with stable incidence since 2013. The characteristics of patients with EHE at diagnosis are presented as well as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and outcome under treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-seven patients with EHE were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010. Median age in the series was 51 (range 10-90) years, 58% were women. Median tumour size was 37 mm (4-220). Forty-eight percent, 42%, and 10% were visceral, soft parts, or bone primaries. The most frequent sites were liver (28%), lung (13%). 40% were reported to have systemic (i.e. multifocal or metastatic disease) at diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 20 months, OS and PFS rates at 24 months were 82% and 67%, with 10-year projected OS and PFS of 62% and 21% respectively. Male and M+ patients at diagnosis had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS. Local treatment was associated with a favourable survival in localised but not in patients with advanced stage at diagnosis. For 23 patients receiving medical treatment, PFS and OS were 50.2% and 33.2% at 60 months were respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EHE is a frequently metastatic sarcoma at diagnosis with a unique natural history. This study shows in a nationwide series over 12 years that most patients progressed but are still alive at 10 years, both in localised and metastatic stages.

Primary pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (PEH) is a rare tumour of vascular origin with low to intermediate malignancy. Typical radiological finding on CT is multiple small nodules in bilateral lungs, and some will have punctate calcifications and pleural thickening. The diagnosis of PEH is confirmed by histopathological findings and positive immunohistochemistry staining. We report a case of a woman in her 50s with a medical history of lung adenocarcinoma. Later, regular chest CT during a routine cancer follow-up revealed multiple small pulmonary nodules and increased sizes of these nodules on serial images, initially misdiagnosed as multiple lung metastases. The histopathological diagnosis was made on a pulmonary wedge resection. Finally, PEH was diagnosed on the basis of positive immunohistochemical staining for CD31, ERF and TFE3. In the current study, the clinicopathological features and review of the literature were investigated. Our case highlights the importance of a histological diagnosis to avoid misdiagnosis.

A Matched Molecular and Clinical Analysis of the Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma Cohort in the Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program and Contextual Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare malignant vascular tumour with a prevalence of 1 per 1,000,000. It is typically molecularly characterised by a WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusion in approximately 90% of cases, or a YAP1::TFE3 gene fusion in approximately 10% of cases. EHE cases are typically refractory to therapies, and no anticancer agents are reimbursed for EHE in Australia.

METHODS

We report a cohort of nine EHE cases with comprehensive histologic and molecular profiling from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program (WEHI-SFRCP) collated via nation-wide referral to the Australian Rare Cancer (ARC) Portal. The diagnoses of EHE were confirmed by histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) examination. Molecular profiling was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay, the TruSight RNA fusion panel, whole genome sequencing (WGS), or whole exome sequencing (WES).

RESULTS

Molecular analysis of RNA, DNA or both was possible in seven of nine cases. The WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion was identified in five cases. The YAP1::TFE3 fusion was identified in one case, demonstrating unique morphology compared to cases with the more common WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion. All tumours expressed typical endothelial markers CD31, ERG, and CD34 and were negative for pan-cytokeratin. Cases with a WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion displayed high expression of CAMTA1 and the single case with a YAP1::TFE3 fusion displayed high expression of TFE3. Survival was highly variable and unrelated to molecular profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort of EHE cases provides molecular and histopathological characterisation and matching clinical information that emphasises the molecular patterns and variable clinical outcomes and adds to our knowledge of this ultra-rare cancer. Such information from multiple studies will advance our understanding, potentially improving treatment options.

NOTCH3 missense mutations as predictor of long-term response to gemcitabine in a patient with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

PURPOSE

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) as a very rare malignant vascular tumor belongs to the heterogenous group of soft-tissue sarcomas. Depending on the clinical course of the disease, interdisciplinary treatment concepts are required, including surgery, radiotherapy and systemic cancer therapy. However, due to its uncommonness, standard treatment options are lacking so far, especially in advanced disease with distant metastases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here we report on an unusual case of a patient with metastasized EHE showing long-term response to second line treatment with gemcitabine over almost 2 decades. Cancer genome sequencing of the patient's tumor tissue detected a NOTCH3 missense mutation which could provide an explanation for these clinical findings. NOTCH3 is known to be a mediator of resistance towards gemcitabine-based cancer treatment, at least in pancreatic cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

The observation that this missense mutation of NOTCH3 is associated with an increased response to treatment with gemcitabine in EHE can be used prospectively to assess NOTCH3 as potential biomarker for predicting therapy response to gemcitabine.

Poor response to sintilimab plus chemotherapy in a pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma patient: a case report

Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (PEH) is a rare vascular tumor with no established treatment protocol. The authors report the case of a young woman diagnosed with PEH. DNA and RNA analysis by next-generation sequencing was performed on the tumor tissue. A novel germline PALB2 mutation and classical WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion were identified. She experienced a poor response to sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. PEH patients harboring a germline PALB2 mutation and WWTR1-CAMTA1 gene fusion may respond poorly to treatment with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy.

Management and outcomes of advanced hemangioendothelioma at a medical oncology clinic in an Indian tertiary care center

Aim

Hemangioendotheliomas (HEs) are malignant vascular tumors with sparse descriptions in literature owing to their rarity.

Study design

Ours is a retrospective study among patients of advanced HEs registered between September 2015 and April 2021.

Results

There were 13 patients with median age 34.6 (range: 4-69 years), male preponderance (69%) and predominant subtype of epithelioid HE (76.9%). Common primary sites were viscera (46.2%) and bone (30.8%). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) yielded objective responses in 30% patients whereas chemotherapy only produced disease stabilization in 7.7%.

Conclusion

We recognize an aggressive subset of HEs with manifestations such as acute liver failure and splenic rupture. Currently no biomarkers predict the efficacy of TKIs over chemotherapy; however, TKIs showed promising outcomes in this series.

What's the latest with investigational drugs for soft tissue sarcoma?

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research undertaken in the past 20-30 years, the treatment for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has remained largely the same, with anthracycline-based chemotherapy remaining the first choice for treating advanced or metastatic STS.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on newly approved drugs for STS and current research directions, including recent results of late-phase trials in patients with STS. We cover several different histological subtypes, and we discuss the role of adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapies for the treatment of synovial and myxoid/round cell (high-grade myxoid) liposarcoma, one of the most promising areas of treatment development to date. We searched clinicaltrials.gov and pubmed.ncbi.nih.gov, as well as recent year proceedings from the annual conferences of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS).

EXPERT OPINION

Immune-oncology drugs (IOs) show promise in certain subtypes of STS, but it is recognized that PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibition is not enough on its own. Better trial stratifications based on the molecular categorization of different subtypes of STS are needed, and more evidence suggests that 'one size fits all' treatment is no longer sustainable in this heterogeneous and aggressive group of tumors.

Establishment and Validation of a Nomogram Prognostic Model for Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

Background. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultrarare vascular sarcoma. At present, the epidemiological and clinical characteristics and prognostic factors are still unclear. Our study attempted to describe clinical features, investigate the prognostic indicators, and establish the nomogram prediction model based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for EHE patients. Methods. The patients diagnosed with EHE from 1986 to 2018 were collected from the SEER database and were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group at a ratio of 7 : 3. The Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the independent factors affecting prognosis and establish a nomogram prognostic model to predict the survival rates for patients with EHE. The accuracy and discriminative ability of the model were measured using the concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration curves. The clinical applicability and application value of the model were evaluated by decision curve analysis. Results. The overall age-adjusted incidence of EHE was 0.31 patients per 1,000,000 individuals, with a statistically significant difference per year. Overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years for all patients was 76.5%, 57.4%, and 48.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, tumour stage, degree of tissue differentiation, surgical treatment, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as independent factors affecting prognosis ( $P<0.05$ ). The C-index values for our nomogram model of training group and validation group were 0.752 and 0.753, respectively. The calibration curve was in good agreement with the actual observation results, suggesting that the prediction model has good accuracy. The decision curve analysis indicated a relatively large net benefit. Conclusions. The nomogram model may play an important role in predicting the survival rate for EHE patients, with good concordance and accuracy, and can be applied in clinical practice.

Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments

BACKGROUND

In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS.

METHODS

Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021).

RESULTS

Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Primary malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the pleura: A review and report of a novel case

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is considered an uncommon tumor originating from vascular tissues. Although this disease is an extremely rare malignant cancer, its pleural subtype is even less common. We discuss a 68-year-old man with isolated pleural epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, along with a literature review of all similar cases.

Management of Vascular Sarcoma

Vascular sarcomas encompass 3 well-defined sarcoma types: hemangioendothelioma, Kaposi sarcoma, and angiosarcoma. These distinct types are exceedingly rare and very different in terms of clinical behavior, biological features, and treatment approach. Because of this rarity and heterogeneity, it is crucial that vascular sarcomas are treated in sarcoma reference centers or networks, in order to ensure optimal management. The diversity of vascular sarcomas also needs to be taken into account in the design of clinical trials, in order to produce meaningful results that can be consistently translated into everyday clinical practice.

Case Report: 18F-FDG PET/CT Demonstrating Malignant Spread of a Pulmonary Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular malignancy that is typically low-to-intermediate grade. We report a 47-year-old man with a rapidly progressive pulmonary EHE who initially presented with asymptomatic pulmonary nodules. One nodule was mildly hypermetabolic on initial ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. 10 months later, the patient developed severe bone pain and night sweats. Repeat imaging revealed several lung lesions, diffuse pleural thickening, and multiple skeletal metastases with considerably increased tracer uptake. The patient underwent vertebral, pleural, and pulmonary biopsies and a diagnosis of advanced pulmonary EHE was made. His disease progressed despite four courses of antineoplastic therapy, after which he began palliative care. Pulmonary EHE can be aggressive and spread rapidly. Biopsy of hypermetabolic lung lesions using PET/CT guidance might enable early definitive diagnosis.

Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel: Worthy of Further Study in Sarcomas

Taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) play an important role in the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is a new kind of taxane and has many advantages compared with paclitaxel and docetaxel. Nab-paclitaxel is currently approved for the treatment of advanced breast, non-small cell lung, and pancreatic cancers. However, the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in sarcomas has not been reviewed. In this review, we first compare the similarities and differences among nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, and docetaxel and then summarize the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel against various non-sarcoma malignancies based on clinical trials with reported results. The efficacy and clinical research progress on nab-paclitaxel in sarcomas are also summarized. This review will serve as a good reference for the application of nab-paclitaxel in clinical sarcoma treatment studies and the design of clinical trials.

Malignant Vascular Tumors of the Head and Neck-Which Type of Therapy Works Best?

Simple Summary

Malignant vascular tumors are extremely rare tumors with variable clinical courses, and few data on their clinical management are available. Diagnosis is difficult due to their wide morphologic appearance. The intent of the present review is to demonstrate the current knowledge and management on malignant vascular tumors of the head and neck area. The mainstay of treatment for malignant vascular tumors is surgery, but radiotherapy and chemotherapy are also parts of the treatment concept especially in angiosarcomas. Targeted therapy, antiangiogenetic drugs and immunotherapy have been studied as new treatment options.

Abstract

Malignant vascular tumors of the head and neck are rare neoplasms with variable clinical presentation, wide age distribution, and variable clinical courses. The heterogeneous presentation of angiosarcomas and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma often leads to misdiagnosis and unsuitable treatment. While risk factors for angiosarcomas are previous radiation, chronic lymphedema, and exposure to arsenic, thorium oxide, or vinyl chloride, there are only limited and retrospective data available on prognostic factors in EHE. In both angiosarcomas and EHE, surgery is the mainstay of treatment. There is limited evidence regarding the role of radiotherapy in EHE, although EHE is considered relatively radiosensitive. In angiosarcomas, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended according to retrospective case series. A standard medical therapy for metastasized malignant vascular tumors is lacking. Chemotherapy, which is effective in angiosarcoma, is mostly ineffective in EHE. Targeted therapy, antiangiogenetic drugs and immunotherapy have been studied as new treatment options. The goal of this review is to summarize the current data regarding malignant vascular tumors along with their diagnosis and management.

Primary pleural epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: case report and review of the literature

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an extremely rare vascular sarcoma with an unpredictable clinical behavior. Pleural EHEs have been associated with poor response to treatment and reduced survival. To date, no standard treatment for EHE is available. Here we report the case of a 53-year-old man who underwent radical surgery for a symptomatic primary pleural EHE. Clinical presentation was characterized by chronic pain in the left hemithorax with transitory flare, anemia, weight loss and progressive worsening of clinical conditions. After surgery, he resumed active life and normal daily activities and, at 8 months, 18F-FDG PET and computed tomography scan showed no radiological evidence of recurrent disease. Clinical signs of this rare disease, histological features, imaging findings and functional imaging are discussed. We also report a summary of other cases with resected pleural EHE and we briefly review the role of chemotherapeutic, immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic drugs for advanced disease.

Advancing the diagnosis of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma by 18F-FDG PET/CT

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular tumor originating from endothelial cells. Since ultrasound findings of EHE are nonspecific, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used for diagnosing the disease. Accumulating evidence indicates that ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has implemental value in diagnosing EHE. In this Perspective, we outline the most recent evidence reporting the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in EHE. The combinational use of CT, MRI, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may help clinicians diagnose the disease in its earlier stages.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, an ultra-rare cancer: a consensus paper from the community of experts

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, translocated, vascular sarcoma. EHE clinical behavior is variable, ranging from that of a low-grade malignancy to that of a high-grade sarcoma and it is marked by a high propensity for systemic involvement. No active systemic agents are currently approved specifically for EHE, which is typically refractory to the antitumor drugs used in sarcomas. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy for EHE patients and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of the disease make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for many EHE patients. To address the shortcoming, a global consensus meeting was organized in December 2020 under the umbrella of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) involving >80 experts from several disciplines from Europe, North America and Asia, together with a patient representative from the EHE Group, a global, disease-specific patient advocacy group, and Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN). The meeting was aimed at defining, by consensus, evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to primary and metastatic EHE. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication.

•

This consensus paper provides key recommendations on the management of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE).

•

Recommendations followed a consensus meeting between experts and a representative of the EHE advocacy group and SPAEN.

•

Authorship includes a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions from Europe, North America and Asia.