1
|
Zeilinger EL, Zrnic‐Novakovic I, Oppenauer C, Fellinger M, Knefel M, Unseld M, Wagner T, Lubowitzki S, Bartsch R, Zöchbauer‐Müller S, Raderer M, Staber PB, Valent P, Gaiger A. Prevalence and biopsychosocial indicators of fatigue in cancer patients. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7293. [PMID: 38819432 PMCID: PMC11141333 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Symptoms of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and treatment adherence. We aimed to investigate the relationship between CRF and multiple psychosocial and somatic indicators within a large mixed cancer sample. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, N = 1787 outpatients with cancer were assessed for CRF, pain, anxiety, and depression using validated screening instruments. We further obtained clinical parameters (Hb, CRP, creatinine, leukocytes, ASAT, and ALAT), sociodemographic data (age, gender, income, education level, marital status, parenthood, and living area), and lifestyle factors. Multivariate linear regression models were applied to estimate the impact of each indicator on CRF. RESULTS Overall, 90.6% of patients experienced some CRF, with 14.8% experiencing severe CRF. No gender difference was found in the prevalence of CRF. Patients with higher levels of pain, depressive symptoms, and lower Hb levels had significantly higher levels of CRF (ps <0.001). Lower levels of CRF were observed in patients who had children (p = 0.03), had less education (p < 0.001), and were physically active for more than 2 h per week before their oncological diagnosis (p = 0.014). The latter was only a significant indicator in the male subsample. CONCLUSION The present results demonstrate a high prevalence of CRF and highlight that not only somatic and psychosocial factors, but also lifestyle factors prior to diagnosis appear to be associated with the etiology and persistence of CRF. To effectively treat CRF, a biopsychosocial, personalized approach is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth L. Zeilinger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of Clinical Research SBGAcademy for Ageing Research, Haus der BarmherzigkeitViennaAustria
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Irina Zrnic‐Novakovic
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Claudia Oppenauer
- Division of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology and PsychodynamicsKarl Landsteiner University of Health SciencesKremsAustria
| | - Matthäus Fellinger
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Second Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyClinic Hietzing, Vienna Healthcare GroupViennaAustria
| | - Matthias Knefel
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of Internal MedicineLandesklinikum Baden‐MödlingBadenAustria
| | - Matthias Unseld
- Department of Clinical Research SBGAcademy for Ageing Research, Haus der BarmherzigkeitViennaAustria
| | - Theresa Wagner
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Simone Lubowitzki
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Sabine Zöchbauer‐Müller
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Markus Raderer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Philipp B. Staber
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Peter Valent
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and OncologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Alexander Gaiger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and OncologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
He J, Chen Z, Zhang J, Liu X. Knowledge and attitudes toward mild traumatic brain injury among patients and family members. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1349169. [PMID: 38855450 PMCID: PMC11157019 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1349169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a prevalent health issue with significant effects on patients' lives. Understanding and attitudes toward mTBI among patients and their families can influence management and outcomes. This study aimed to assess knowledge and attitudes toward mTBI in these groups. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at Zhejiang Hospital from July 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023. Patients with mTBI and their family members participated. Data were collected via an online questionnaire covering demographic information and mTBI knowledge and attitudes. Knowledge scores ranged from 0 to 20 and attitude scores from 8 to 40. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors influencing these scores. Results A total of 573 valid questionnaires were analyzed (289 males, 50.44%; 284 females, 49.56%). Among respondents, 258 (45.03%) had experienced a concussion. Mean knowledge and attitude scores were 11.00 ± 2.75 and 27.78 ± 4.07, respectively. Monthly per capita income of 5,000-10,000 RMB was negatively associated with knowledge and attitude scores (β = 0.160, 95% CI: [3.245 to 0.210], P = 0.026). Middle school education decreased the likelihood of positive attitudes toward mTBI (OR = 0.378, 95% CI: [0.1630.874], P = 0.023). mTBI due to falls was associated with increased likelihood of positive attitudes (OR = 3.588, 95% CI: [1.274-10.111], P = 0.016). Discussion Significant gaps in knowledge and attitudes toward mTBI exist among patients and their families, influenced by income and education levels. Personal experience with mTBI from falls correlates with more positive attitudes. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions to improve understanding and attitudes, ultimately enhancing patient care and management. Comprehensive, accessible mTBI education is crucial for fostering positive attitudes and better knowledge among patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian He
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhongliang Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knefel M, Zeilinger EL, Erfurth A, Lubowitzki S, Lesch O, Wagner T, Unseld M, Bartsch R, Füreder T, Jäger U, Kiesewetter B, Krauth MT, Prager G, Raderer M, Staber PB, Valent P, Gaiger A. Affective temperament, fatigue, and pain in cancer patients. J Affect Disord 2023; 340:80-87. [PMID: 37543112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Knefel
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Internal Medicine, Landesklinikum Baden-Mödling, Waltersdorfer Straße 75, 2500 Baden, Austria
| | - Elisabeth L Zeilinger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Erfurth
- Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Lubowitzki
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Otto Lesch
- Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Theresa Wagner
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Unseld
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thorsten Füreder
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Jäger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Kiesewetter
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria T Krauth
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerald Prager
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Raderer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp B Staber
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Valent
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Gaiger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knefel M, Zeilinger EL, Lubowitzki S, Krammer K, Unseld M, Bartsch R, Fuereder T, Jäger U, Kiesewetter B, Krauth M, Raderer M, Staber PB, Valent P, Gaiger A. Risk as a pattern over time: Delineation of time-dependent risk factors in biological, psychological, and social variables in cancer patients. Cancer 2023; 129:3466-3475. [PMID: 37470252 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in cancer patients is associated with a multitude of biological, social, and psychological factors. Although it is well established that all these factors add to overall mortality, it is not well understood how the predictive power of these parameters changes in a comprehensive model and over time. METHODS Patients who attended the authors' outpatient clinic were invited to participate. The authors followed 5180 mixed cancer patients (51.1% female; mean age, 59.1 years [SD = 13.8]) for up to 16 years and analyzed biological (age, sex, cancer site, anemia), psychological (anxiety, depression), and social variables (marital status, education, employment status) potentially predicting overall survival in a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS The median survival time for the entire sample was 4.3 years (95% confidence interval, 4.0-4.7). The overall survival probabilities for 1 and 10 years were 76.8% and 38.0%, respectively. Following an empirical approach, the authors split the time interval into five periods: acute, subacute, short-term, medium-term, and long-term. A complex pattern of variables predicted overall survival differently in the five periods. Biological parameters were important throughout most of the time, social parameters were either time-independent predictors or tended to be more important in the longer term. Of the psychological parameters, only depression was a significant predictor and lost its predictive power in the long-term. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study allow the development of comprehensive patient-specific models of risk and resilience factors addressing biopsychosocial needs of cancer patients, paving the way for a personalized treatment plan that goes beyond biomedical cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Knefel
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine, Landesklinikum Baden-Mödling, Baden, Austria
| | - Elisabeth L Zeilinger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Lubowitzki
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Krammer
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Unseld
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thorsten Fuereder
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Jäger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Kiesewetter
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Krauth
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Raderer
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp B Staber
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Valent
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Gaiger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeilinger EL, Knefel M, Schneckenreiter C, Pietschnig J, Lubowitzki S, Unseld M, Füreder T, Bartsch R, Masel EK, Adamidis F, Kum L, Kiesewetter B, Zöchbauer-Müller S, Raderer M, Krauth MT, Staber PB, Valent P, Gaiger A. The impact of COVID-19 and socioeconomic status on psychological distress in cancer patients. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2023; 23:100404. [PMID: 37663044 PMCID: PMC10469068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological symptom burden against the socioeconomic background of cancer patients using data from routine assessments before and during the pandemic. Method In this cross-sectional study, standardised assessment instruments were applied in N = 1,329 patients to screen for symptoms of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and fatigue from 2018 to 2022. Two MANOVAs with post-hoc tests were computed. First, only time was included as predictor to examine the isolated impact of the pandemic. Second, income level and education level were included as further predictors to additionally test the predictive power of socioeconomic factors. Results In the final model, only income had a significant impact on all aspects of psychological symptom burden, with patients with low income being highly burdened (partial η² = .01, p = .023). The highest mean difference was found for depressive symptoms (MD = 0.13, CI = [0.07; 0.19], p < .001). The pandemic had no further influence on psychological distress. Conclusions Although the pandemic is a major stressor in many respects, poverty may be the more important risk factor for psychological symptom burden in cancer outpatients, outweighing the impact of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Knefel
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine, Landesklinikum Baden-Mödling, Baden, Austria
| | - Carmen Schneckenreiter
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jakob Pietschnig
- Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Lubowitzki
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Unseld
- Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thorsten Füreder
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Katharina Masel
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Feroniki Adamidis
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lea Kum
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Kiesewetter
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Zöchbauer-Müller
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Raderer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Theresa Krauth
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp B Staber
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Valent
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Gaiger
- Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prevalence of anxiety and depression in people with different types of cancer or haematologic malignancies: a cross-sectional study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022; 31:e74. [PMID: 36245424 PMCID: PMC9583630 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796022000592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Cancer patients often present with psychological symptoms that affect their quality of life, physical health outcomes and survival. Two of the most frequent psychiatric comorbidities are anxiety and depression. However, the prevalence of these disorders among cancer patients remains unclear, as studies frequently report varying rates. In the present study, we aimed to provide robust point estimates for the prevalence of anxiety and depression for both a mixed cancer sample and for 13 cancer types separately, considering confounding variables. METHODS In a sample of 7509 cancer outpatients (51.4% female), we used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess rates of anxiety and depression. Applying ordinal logistic regression models, we compared the prevalence of anxiety and depression between different cancer types, controlling for age and gender. RESULTS About one third of our sample showed symptoms of anxiety (35.2%) or depression (27.9%), and every sixth patient had a very likely psychiatric condition, with women being more frequently affected. Elderly patients more often showed signs of depression. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was significantly higher in lung and brain cancer patients, than in other cancer patients. Lowest depression rates were found in breast cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of anxiety and depression is high in cancer patients. Type of cancer is an important predictor for anxiety and depressive symptoms, with lung and brain cancer patients being highly burdened. Considering a personalised medicine approach, physicians should take into account the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities and include psychiatric consultations in the treatment plan.
Collapse
|
7
|
Latent structure and measurement invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cancer outpatients. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2022; 22:100315. [PMID: 35662789 PMCID: PMC9157192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|