Postremission sequential monitoring of minimal residual disease by WT1 Q-PCR and multiparametric flow cytometry assessment predicts relapse and may help to address risk-adapted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia patients

Venetoclax plus decitabine as a bridge to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (VEN-DEC GITMO): final report of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Access to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) remains challenging for older patients (aged >60 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax plus decitabine as first-line therapy and bridge to transplantation in this patient population.

METHODS

This multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial was conducted in 20 Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) centres in Italy. Patients aged ≥60 and <75 years, with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia categorised as intermediate or high risk according to 2016 WHO and 2017 European LeukemiaNet, an ECOG performance status of less than 2, and considered fit for allogeneic HSCT were included. Patients received oral venetoclax with a 3-day ramp-up: 100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg once per day from day 3 of cycle one, and then every 28 days of each cycle (two to four in total). Decitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/m2 from days 1 to 5 every 28 days. At cycle one, patients were admitted to hospital for a minimum of 24 h, whereas subsequent cycles could be administered on an outpatient basis. Two additional cycles were allowed while waiting for allogeneic HSCT or for those with no response or partial response after cycle two. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had allogeneic HSCT performed during first complete remission, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04476199, ongoing) and EudraCT (2020-002297-26).

FINDINGS

Between June 1, 2021, and Dec 30, 2022, 93 patients were enrolled and started venetoclax plus decitabine induction (44 [47%] at intermediate risk and 49 [53%] at high risk). The median age was 68·5 (IQR 60·3-74·7). All 93 participants were White, of whom 43 (46%) were female and 50 (54%) were male. The median follow-up was 236 days (IQR 121-506). 64 (69%) of 93 patients reached complete remission and 53 (57%) underwent allogeneic HSCT in complete remission. 53 (83%) of 64 with a complete remission underwent allogeneic HSCT. Five (8%) of 64 patients in complete remission relapsed before transplantation and four died as a consequence. Adverse events (grade ≥3) occurred in 49 (53%) of 93 patients. The most common adverse events were infections (including pneumonia, bacterial sepsis, and SARS-CoV-2 causing seven deaths among 28 [57%] of 49 patients), neutropenia (17 [35%]), thrombocytopenia (two [4%], including one fatal CNS bleeding), and cardiac events (four [8%], including one fatal heart failure). No treatment-related deaths were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Venetoclax plus decitabine induction can significantly enhance the feasibility of allogeneic HSCT in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia who are deemed fit for transplantation.

FUNDING

AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson.

WT1-guided pre-emptive therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided pre-emptive therapies are now widely used to prevent post-transplant hematological relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This single-center retrospective study aimed to clarify the significance of pre-emptive treatment based on Wilms' tumor gene-1 mRNA (WT1) monitoring for MRD in patients with AML who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Patients with AML who received chemotherapy for hematological relapse or WT1 increase after allo-HSCT were eligible for inclusion. From January 2017 to June 2022, 30 patients with a median age of 57 (16-70) years were included and stratified into two groups: 10 with WT1 increase and 20 with hematological relapse. The median times from HCT to WT1 increase or hematological relapse were 309 days (range: 48-985) or 242 days (range: 67-1116), respectively. Less intensive chemotherapy using azacitidine or cytarabine was selected for all patients with WT1 increase and 12 (60%) with hematological relapse. The 1-year overall survival and event-free survival rates for WT1 increase and hematological relapse were 70% vs. 44% (P = 0.024) and 70% vs. 29% (P = 0.029), respectively. These real-world data suggest that WT1-guided pre-emptive therapy may be superior to therapy after hematological relapse in patients with AML who have undergone allo-HSCT.

Role of WT1 in Measurable Residual Disease Follow-Up in the Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Setting

Objectives: The Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) plays a critical role in cell development and the regulation of essential genes involved in cell growth and metabolism. In the context of hematopoietic tumors, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), WT1 has been identified as a potential marker for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains a significant challenge in AML treatment, highlighting the importance of MRD monitoring for risk stratification and treatment decisions. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of WT1 as a molecular marker for MRD and its correlation with chimerism in AML patients post-allo-SCT setting. Methods: We have included 58 patients with WT1-expression-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received allo-SCT in our center between 2016-2022. The exclusion criteria are as follows: not having WT1 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measurement at diagnosis, not receiving allo-SCT, and not having a serial measurement of WT1 post-transplant. Pre- and post-transplant assessments were made with flow cytometry, WT1 PCR, and bone marrow morphological evaluations. Statistical analyses were carried out to explore correlations between WT1 levels, MRD markers, and chimerism post-transplantation. Results: We found that WT1 had a significant correlation with flow cytometry and bone marrow morphological evaluation, but not with chimerism. Interestingly, high WT1 expressors exhibited a more robust correlation with chimerism compared to the general cohort. The negative predictive value for post-allo-SCT relapse was 91.8% for the whole WT1 cohort; for high WT1 expressors, it was similar, at 87.5%. The negative predictive value for post-allo-SCT relapse was high for the whole WT1 cohort; for high WT1 expressors, it was similar. The WT1 MRD assay showed a high negative predictive value for post-allo-SCT relapse, consistent across both the entire cohort (91.8%) and high WT1 expressors (87.5%). Conclusions: WT1 expression levels may serve as a valuable ancillary marker in MRD assessment and relapse prediction post-allo-SCT in AML patients, particularly for those lacking specific fusion genes or mutations. However, further large-scale, controlled studies are needed to standardize WT1 MRD assays and establish clear guidelines for their clinical application.

High WT1 expression predicted induction chemotherapy failure in acute myeloid leukemia patients with non-favorable cytogenetic risk

The prognostic significance of WT1 expression at diagnosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains obscure, and subgroup analysis is the way for clarification. We previously reported the results in t(8;21) AML. In this study, 437 consecutive adult AML patients with non-favorable cytogenetic risk were enrolled. All patients were tested WT1 transcript levels using real-time quantitative PCR at diagnosis; AML-related common fusion genes, KMT2A-PTD, FLT3-ITD, NPM1, CEBPA and TP53 mutations were simultaneously tested. 92.4% of patients overexpressed WT1 compared to normal bone marrow. The existence of FLT3-ITD, NPM1 mutation and the absence of CEBPA biallelic mutation were significantly related to higher WT1 expression. The cutoff value for WT1 was determined by performing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in regard to complete remission (CR) achievement and was used to categorize patients into low-expression (WT1-L) and high-expression (WT1-H) groups. In the entire cohort, WT1-H was significantly associated with a lower 1-course and 2-course CR rate (P < 0.0010 and P = 0.0060) but was not related to relapse-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that WT1-H was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both 1-course and 2-course CR achievement. Subgroup analysis was further performed. WT1-H had a significant adverse impact on CR achievement within intermediate-cytogenetic risk, high-cytogenetic risk, ELN-defined-intermediate-risk, normal karyotype, KMT2A rearrangement, FAB-M2, FAB-M5 and NPM1 mutation (+) subgroups, whereas it had no impact within ELN-defined-low-risk, ELN-defined-high-risk, FAB-M4, FLT3-ITD mutation (+) and CEBPA biallelic mutation (+) subgroups. Moreover, WT1-H patients had a significantly lower RFS rate than WT1-L patients within both FAB-M5 and KMT2A rearrangement subgroups (P = 0.010 and 0.028), whereas WT1 had no impact on RFS within other subgroups mentioned above (all P > 0.05). Therefore, high WT1 expression at diagnosis independently predicted induction chemotherapy failure in AML patients with non-favorable cytogenetic risk, and it was related to relapse just within FAB-M5 and KMT2A rearrangement subgroups.

Bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism as an early predictor of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is an important tool to optimally address post-transplant management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the impact of bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism and WT1 on the outcome of a consecutive series of 168 AML patients submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Results

The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in patients with donor chimerism on CD34+ cells ≥ 97.5% and WT1 < 213 copies/ABL x 10^4 both at 1^st month (p=0.008 and p<0.001) and at 3^rd month (p<0.001 for both). By combining chimerism and WT1 at 3^rd month, 13 patients with chimerism < 97.5% or WT1 > 213 showed intermediate prognosis. 12 of these patients fell in this category because of molecular chimerism < 97.5% at a time-point in which WT1 was < 213.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that lineage-specific molecular chimerism and WT1 after allo-SCT (1^st and 3^rd month) are useful MRD markers. When considered together at 3^rd month, CD34+ molecular chimerism could represent an earlier predictor of relapse compared to WT1. Further studies are necessary to confirm this preliminary observation.

Feasibility of Leukemia-Derived Exosome Enrichment and Co-isolated dsDNA Sequencing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Proof of Concept for New Leukemia Biomarkers Detection

Simple Summary

The present pilot study aimed at investigating the feasibility of a leukemia-derived exosome enrichment approach followed by exosomal dsDNA target re-sequencing for adult Acute Myeloid Leukemias (AML) marker detection. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a proof-of-concept combining a leukemia-derived exosome enrichment strategy based on a commercial CE-IVD kit and next-generation sequencing was applied in a cohort of adult AML patients. The reported approach is easy, quick and user friendly and gives the possibility of obtaining a good quantity of exosomal dsDNA (composed of exosomal cargo and surrounding DNA) suitable for further analysis. The time-effective procedure opens up future effective clinical applications. This pilot study presents the potential of a proof-of-concept based on exosome analysis to be applied in clinical practice, as well as the feasibility of this kind of investigations using a certified kit, avoiding many additional analyses. It may encourage further studies regarding extracellular vesicles in myeloid neoplasia.

Abstract

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles playing a pivotal role in the intercellular communication. They shuttle different cargoes, including nucleic acids from their cell of origin. For this reason, they have been studied as carriers of tumor markers in different liquid biopsy approaches, in particular for solid tumors. Few data are available concerning exosomes as markers of myeloid neoplasia. To better understand their real potential and the best approach to investigate leukemic exosomes, we present the results of a pilot feasibility study evaluating the application of next-generation sequencing analysis of dsDNA derived from exosomes isolated in 14 adult patients affected by acute myeloid leukemias. In particular, leukemia-derived exosome fractions have been analyzed. The concentration of dsDNA co-extracted with exosomes and the number and types of mutations detected were considered and compared with ones identified in the Bone Marrow (BM) and Peripheral Blood (PB) cells. Exosomal DNA concentration, both considering the cargo and the DNA surrounding the lipid membrane resulted in a linear correlation with leukemic burden. Moreover, exosomal DNA mutation status presented 86.5% of homology with BM and 75% with PB. The results of this pilot study confirmed the feasibility of a leukemia-derived exosome enrichment approach followed by exosomal dsDNA NGS analysis for AML biomarker detection. These data point to the use of liquid biopsy in myeloid neoplasia for the detection of active leukemic cells resident in the BM via a painless procedure.

The Role of Wilms' Tumor Gene (WT1) Expression as a Marker of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The Minimal Residual Disease(MRD) monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is crucial to guide treatment after morphologic complete remission, to define the need for consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT), and to detect impending relapse allowing early intervention. However, more than 50% of patients with AML lack a specific or measurable molecular marker to monitor MRD. We reviewed the key studies on WT1 overexpression as a marker of MRD in AML patients undergoing an intensive chemotherapy program, including Allo-SCT. In addition, we provided some practical considerations on how to properly use WT1 expression as an MRD marker, considering its strengths and weaknesses. In order to achieve the best sensitivity and specificity, it is recommended to refer to the standardized method of European LeukemiaNet and its defined threshold (250 WT1 copies/10⁴ Abelson (ABL) on Bone Marrow-BM and 50 WT1 copies/10⁴ ABL on Peripheral Blood-PB), which has been validated in a large and multicenter cohort of patients and normal controls.

Early detection of WT1 measurable residual disease identifies high-risk patients, independent of transplantation in AML

Postinduction WT1 measurable residual disease is associated with shorter survival and higher risk of relapse in younger patients with AML.

Postinduction WT1 residual disease is an independent prognostic factor in patients eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

WT1 overexpression is frequently identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has been reported to be a potential marker for monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD). We evaluated the use of postinduction WT1 MRD level as a prognostic factor, as well as the interaction between postinduction WT1 MRD response and the effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in the first complete remission (CR). In the ALFA-0702 trial, patients with AML, aged 18 to 59, had a prospective quantification of WT1 MRD. The occurrence of a WT1 MRD ratio >2.5% in bone marrow or >0.5% in peripheral blood was defined as MRD^high, and ratios below these thresholds were defined as MRD^low. The prognostic value of MRD after induction chemotherapy was assessed in 314 patients in first CR by comparing the risk of relapse, the relapse-free survival (RFS), and the overall survival (OS). Interaction between MRD response and the allo-SCT effect was evaluated in patients by comparing the influence of allo-SCT on the outcomes of patients with MRD^high with those with MRD^low. The results showed that patients with MRD^high after induction had a higher risk of relapse and a shorter RFS and OS. The MRD response remained of strong prognostic value in the subset of 225 patients with intermediate-/unfavorable-risk AML who were eligible for allo-SCT, because patients with MRD^high had a significantly higher risk of relapse resulting in worse RFS and OS. The effect of allo-SCT was higher in patients with MRD^low than in those with MRD^high, but not significantly different. The early WT1 MRD response highlights a population of high-risk patients in need of additional therapy.

Optimal time-points for detecting expression levels of BAALC, EVI1, and WT1 genes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis examined the prognostic role of brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic (BAALC), Ecotropic virus integration site-1 (EVI1) and Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) genes at different time-points during conventional chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic search of publications indexed in the electronic databases from January 1988 to October 2020 was performed. Over 7525 cases of AML from 25 studies were involved.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, overexpression of either BAALC or EVI1 had a negative impact on complete remission achievement (Summary Odds ratios [SORs] for BAALC = 0.32; SORs for EVI1 = 0.49) and survival outcome. The summary hazard ratios of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 1.97 and 2.04 for BAALC and 1.33 and 1.86 for EVI1, respectively. The prognostic value of pretreatment WT1 levels was heterogeneous while subgroup analyses unveiled that overexpressed WT1 may correlate with a favorable outcome (summary hazard ratio [SHR] for OS = 0.42). Both WT1 and BAALC played a role in prognosis assessment at post-induction and the diagnostic performance of WT1 transcript reduction was superior to the absolute WT1 level. Post-consolidation WT1 overexpression consistently indicated an increased risk of relapse, while the combined HR for RFS was statistically insignificant (SHR = 4.22).

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm the application of BAALC and EVI1 at diagnosis, WT1 after induction chemotherapy in AML patients throughout conventional chemotherapy.

Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Initial induction chemotherapy to eradicate the bulk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells results in complete remission (CR) in the majority of patients. However, leukemic cells persisting in the bone marrow below the morphologic threshold remain unaffected and have the potential to proliferate and re-emerge as AML relapse. Detection of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) is a promising prognostic marker for AML relapse as it can assess an individual patients' risk profile and evaluate their response to treatment. With the emergence of molecular techniques, such as next generation sequencing (NGS), a more sensitive assessment of molecular MRD markers is available. In recent years, the detection of MRD by molecular assays and its association with AML relapse and survival has been explored and verified in multiple studies. Although most studies show that the presence of MRD leads to a worse clinical outcome, molecular-based methods face several challenges including limited sensitivity/specificity, and a difficult distinction between mutations that are representative of AML rather than clonal hematopoiesis. This review describes the studies that have been performed using molecular-based assays for MRD detection in the context of other MRD detection approaches in AML, and discusses limitations, challenges and opportunities.

Measurable Residual Disease Detected by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry and Sequencing Improves Prediction of Relapse and Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The clinically ideal time point and optimal approach for the assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are still inconclusive. We investigated the clinical value of multiparameter flow cytometry-based MRD (MFC MRD) after induction (n = 492) and two cycles of consolidation (n = 421). The latter time point was proved as a superior indicator with independent prognostic significance for both relapse-free survival (RFS, HR = 3.635, 95% CI: 2.433-5.431, P <0.001) and overall survival (OS: HR = 3.511, 95% CI: 2.191-5.626, P <0.001). Furthermore, several representative molecular MRD markers were compared with the MFC MRD. Both approaches can establish prognostic value in patients with NPM1 mutations, and FLT3, C-KIT, or N-RAS mutations involved in kinase-related signaling pathways, while the combination of both techniques further refined the risk stratification. The detection of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcripts achieved a considerable net reclassification improvement in predicting the prognosis. Conversely, for patients with biallelic CEBPA or DNMT3A mutations, only the MFC method was recommended due to the poor prognostic discriminability in tracking mutant transcripts. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the MFC MRD after two consolidation cycles independently predicted clinical outcomes, and the integration of MFC and molecular MRD should depend on different types of AML-related genetic lesions.

Exosomes and Extracellular Vesicles in Myeloid Neoplasia: The Multiple and Complex Roles Played by These "Magic Bullets"

Simple Summary

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by the majority of cell types and can be isolated from both cell cultures and body fluids. They are involved in cell-to-cell communication and may shuttle different messages (RNA, DNA, and proteins). These messages are known to influence the microenvironment of cells and their behavior. In recent years, some evidence about the involvement of EVs and exosomes, an EV subgroup, in immunomodulation, the transfer of disease markers, and the treatment of myeloid malignancies have been reported. Little is known about these vesicles in this particular setting of hematologic neoplasia; here, we summarize and critically review the available results, aiming to encourage further investigations.

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (exosomes, in particular) are essential in multicellular organisms because they mediate cell-to-cell communication via the transfer of secreted molecules. They are able to shuttle different cargo, from nucleic acids to proteins. The role of exosomes has been widely investigated in solid tumors, which gave us surprising results about their potential involvement in pathogenesis and created an opening for liquid biopsies. Less is known about exosomes in oncohematology, particularly concerning the malignancies deriving from myeloid lineage. In this review, we aim to present an overview of immunomodulation and the microenvironment alteration mediated by exosomes released by malicious myeloid cells. Afterwards, we review the studies reporting the use of exosomes as disease biomarkers and their influence in response to treatment, together with the recent experiences that have focused on the use of exosomes as therapeutic tools. The further development of new technologies and the increased knowledge of biological (exosomes) and clinical (myeloid neoplasia) aspects are expected to change the future approaches to these malignancies.

Association of Measurable Residual Disease With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Measurable residual disease (MRD) refers to neoplastic cells that cannot be detected by standard cytomorphologic analysis. In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), determining the association of MRD with survival may improve prognostication and inform selection of efficient clinical trial end points.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between MRD status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with AML using scientific literature.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical studies on AML published between January 1, 2000, and October 1, 2018, were identified via searches of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

Literature search and study screening were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Studies that assessed DFS or OS by MRD status in patients with AML were included. Reviews, non-English-language articles, and studies reporting only outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation or those with insufficient description of MRD information were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study sample size, median patient age, median follow-up time, MRD detection method, MRD assessment time points, AML subtype, specimen source, and survival outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed separately for DFS and OS using bayesian hierarchical modeling.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Meta-analyses of survival probabilities and hazard ratios (HRs) were conducted for OS and DFS according to MRD status.

RESULTS

Eighty-one publications reporting on 11 151 patients were included. The average HR for achieving MRD negativity was 0.36 (95% bayesian credible interval [CrI], 0.33-0.39) for OS and 0.37 (95% CrI, 0.34-0.40) for DFS. The estimated 5-year DFS was 64% for patients without MRD and 25% for those with MRD, and the estimated OS was 68% for patients without MRD and 34% for those with MRD. The association of MRD negativity with DFS and OS was significant for all subgroups, with the exception of MRD assessed by cytogenetics or fluorescent in situ hybridization.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that achievement of MRD negativity is associated with superior DFS and OS in patients with AML. The value of MRD negativity appears to be consistent across age groups, AML subtypes, time of MRD assessment, specimen source, and MRD detection methods. These results support MRD status as an end point that may allow for accelerated evaluation of novel therapies in AML.

WT1 Expression in Peripheral Blood at Diagnosis and During the Course of Early Consolidation Treatment Correlates With Survival in Patients With Intermediate and Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Up to 55% of non-APL acute myeloid leukemias (AML) lack a molecular target suitable for standardized disease monitoring. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of WT1 gene expression at early stages of intensive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 106 consecutive patients with intermediate and high-risk AML who had WT1 expression at diagnosis >500 copies/10⁴ABL and who achieved remission after 1 to 2 cycles of induction treatment were analyzed. WT1 expression was measured in peripheral blood using a standardized European LeukemiaNet method. Overexpression was defined as >50 copies/10⁴ABL. The median follow-up was 30 months.

RESULTS

Patients with normal versus high WT1 expression after 2 cycles of chemotherapy had overall survival (OS) at 3 years of 66% versus 41% (P = .01); event-free survival (EFS) 45% versus 22% (P = .01). Prognostic significance of WT1 expression after 2 cycles of treatment was maintained in the group of patients treated with chemotherapy alone without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first line treatment (OS 70% vs. 36%, P = .02; EFS 35% vs. 0%, P = .03). Significant prognostic factors for EFS on multivariate analysis were the achievement of molecular remission (<50 copies of WT1) at any time during treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, P = .04) and increased WT1 expression after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (HR 2.0, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Increased WT1 expression after 2 cycles of chemotherapy is a negative prognostic factor for survival. WT1 remains a valuable molecular marker in AML without any leukemia-specific mutation, especially if next generation sequencing and/or digital polymerase chain reaction are not routinely available.

Biological versus Clinical Risk Factors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is There a Winner?

We present a case of a patient with a three-month history of peripheral blood cytopenia without a confirmed diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, who developed a favourable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to the European Leukemia Net (ELN) criteria. The patient achieved a complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRi) after induction. The patient achieved the morphological CR after the first consolidation and completed the first-line treatment with a syngeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A disease relapse occurred after one year of CR (blast cell count in the bone marrow 15%), and the patient was offered a haplo-SCT, which he refused due to personal reasons. In this paper, we discuss the interplay between clinical and biological risk factors in non-high-risk AML patients and speculate that some old clinical risk factors (e.g., age of the patient, achievement of CR after induction, and previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome) may still impact on the treatment decision algorithm of some of these patients.

Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review for the Practicing Clinician

Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in acute myeloid leukemia is increasingly being used to assess treatment response and stratify the risk of relapse for individual patients. Molecular methods for MRD testing began with PCR-based assays for individual recurrent mutations. To date, there is robust evidence for testing NPM1, CBFB-MYH11, and RUNX1/RUNXT1 mutations using this approach, though the best timing and threshold level for each mutation varies. More recent approaches have been with PCR-based multigene panels, occasionally combined with flow cytometric techniques, and next-generation sequencing techniques. This review outlines the various techniques used in molecular approaches to MRD, the evidence behind individual mutation testing, and the novel approaches for evaluating multigene MRD so that clinicians can understand and incorporate these evaluations into their practice.

[Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute leukemia]

In recent years, great progress has been made in the treatment outcome of childhood acute leukemia with the improvement of chemotherapy regimens and the introduction of risk-stratified therapy; however, minimal residual disease (MRD) is still a difficult problem which affects the prognosis of acute leukemia. MRD influences the selection of chemotherapy regimens and recurrence risk stratification, and meanwhile, it can be used for prognostic prediction. At present, flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction are mainly used for MRD detection. The next-generation sequencing also plays an important role in MRD detection, especially in MRD detection after stem cell transplantation. This article reviews the methodology and significance of MRD detection in childhood acute leukemia.

Combined usage of Wilms' tumor gene quantitative analysis and multiparameter flow cytometry for minimal residual disease monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation

High expression of the Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been considered as a sensitive marker of minimal residual disease (MRD). The present study investigated the significance of quantitative analysis of WT1 mRNA, combined with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) regarding its efficacy and prognostic as well as relapse prediction value for leukemia patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that the expression of WT1 in the initial and relapse group was significant higher than that in the complete remission (CR) group (P<0.01). WT1 and the donor chimerism were negatively correlated (r=-0.73, P<0.05). In all AML patients, WT1 was the highest in the M3 subtype and the lowest in the M1 subtype. Follow-up of 12 AML patients demonstrated that WT1 gene expression levels markedly decreased after CR, but obviously increased after relapse, as did the rate of the leukemia cells detected by MFC. The combined usage of MFC and WT1 monitoring contributed to an improved detection rate of relapse (91.7%), and may be used to monitor MRD, assess the treatment efficacy and prognosis, and predict the risk of recurrence in leukemia patients without specific molecular markers after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

[Outcomes of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia received idarubicin plus cytarabine regimen as induction chemotherapy]

Objective: To explore outcomes in adult with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received IA10 (10 mg/m(2) d1-3 idarubicin plus cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) d1-7) regimen as induction chemotherapy. Methods: From January 2008 to February 2016, data of consecutive newly-diagnosed AML (non-M(3)) adults treated with IA10 who achieved morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) but not accepted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) were assessed retrospectively. Results: A total of 198 patients were included in this study with 96 (48.5%) male and a median age of 42 years old (range, 18-62 years old). Using the SWOG cytogenetic classification, 45 (22.7%), 104 (52.5%), 24 (12.1%) and 25 (12.6%) patients belonged to favorable, intermediate, unfavorable and unknown categories, respectively. 6 (3.0%) patients had monosomal karyotype, and 28 (14.1%) positive FLT3-ITD mutation. A complete remission (CR, defined as MLFS with ANC ≥ 1×10(9)/L and PLT ≥ 100×10(9)/L) achieved in 168 (84.8%) patients, a CRp (defined as MLFS with incomplete PLT recovery) in 16 (8.1%) and a CRi (defined as MLFS with incomplete ANC and PLT recovery) in 14 (7.1%). With a median follow-up period of 15 months (range, 1 to 70 months) in survivors, the probabilities of cumulative incident of relapse (CIR), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2-year were 45.2%, 46.9% and 62.9%, respectively; the median durations of relapse, DFS and OS were 34, 20 and 37 months respectively. At the time of achieving first MLFS, multivariate analyses showed that positive FLT3-ITD mutation and CRi were common adverse factors affecting CIR, DFS and OS; unfavorable-risk of SWOG criteria was an adverse factor affecting CIR and DFS; monosomal karyotype was associated with shorter OS. After first consolidation therapy, FLT3-ITD mutation positive and unfavorable-risk of SWOG criteria had negatively impact on CIR, DFS and OS; peripheral blasts ≥ 0.50 and positive MRD (defined as RQ-PCR WT1 mRNA ≥ 0.6% or any level of abnormal blast population detected by flow cytometry) after first consolidation therapy were common adverse factors affecting CIR and DFS; CRi was an adverse factor affecting DFS and OS. Conclusions: In adult with de novo AML received IA10 regimen as induction regimen, unfavorable molecular markers or cytogenetics at diagnosis and CRi independently predicted poor outcome. In addition, a higher percentage of peripheral blasts, monosomal karyotype and positive MRD after first consolidation therapy had negatively impact on outcomes.

High prognostic value of pre-allogeneic stem cell transplantation minimal residual disease detection by WT1 gene expression in AML transplanted in cytologic complete remission

We analyzed the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients according to molecular Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) status prior to allo-SCT. MRD was assessed by the quantitative expression of the pan-leukemic marker Wilms' tumor (WT1) gene, according to the validated LeukemiaNet method. Between 2005 and 2016, 122 consecutive AML patients, WT1 positive at diagnosis, received allo-SCT in cytologic complete remission (cCR). The median age at SCT was 53 years (range 18-70). Quantitative analysis of WT1 gene expression (bone marrow samples) was available in all cases both at diagnosis (100% of samples overexpressed WT1 with a mean of 8607±8187 copies/10⁴ Abelson) and immediately before allo-SCT. Eighty one cases (66%) were MRD-WT1 negative (WT1 <250 copies) and 41/122 (44%) cases were MRD-WT1 positive (WT1 >250 copies) prior to allo-SCT. We evaluated post-SCT overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and relapse rate (RR), according to MRD-WT1 status pre-SCT. Both post-allo-SCT OS and DFS were significantly improved in patients who were MRD-WT1 negative at the time of SCT compared with those who were MRD-WT1 positive, with a median OS and DFS not reached in the MRD-WT1 negative group and 9 and 8 months, respectively, in the WT1 positive group (OS log-rank p<0.0001; hazard ratio [HR] 3.9, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.0-7.38; DFS log-rank p<0.0001; HR 3.73, 95% CI 2.0-6.72). The RR after SCT was 15% (12/81) in pre-SCT MRD-WT1 negative cases and 44% (18/41) in MRD-WT1 positive cases (p=0.00073). Univariate analysis showed that MRD-WT1 negativity pre-SCT and grade <2 acute GVHD were significant prognostic factors for improved OS and DFS. However multivariate analysis showed MRD-WT1 negativity pre-SCT was the only independent prognostic factor for improved OS and DFS. These data show that pre allo-SCT molecular MRD evaluation using WT1 expression is a powerful predictor of post allo-SCT outcomes in AML undergoing SCT in cCR. Patients with both cCR and MRD-WT1 negativity before SCT have a very good outcome with lower RR and improved OS. The pre allo-SCT MRD-WT1 stratification in AML is a valuable tool to identify patients at high risk of post-SCT relapse, and can influence conditioning regimen intensification and/or post-SCT preemptive strategies.

[Minimal residual disease level predicts outcomes in the non-favorable risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia]

Objective: To explore impact of minimal residual leukemia (MRD) on outcomes in the non-favorable risk adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) . Methods: From January 2008 to February 2016, data of consecutive newly-diagnosed non-favorable risk adults with AML (non-APL) according to SWOG criteria who achieved morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) and received continuous chemotherapy were assessed retrospectively. Results: 292 AML patients were enrolled, 150 (51.4%) were male. Median age was 46 years (range, 18-65 years) . Using the SWOG cytogenetic classification, 186 (63.7%) , 49 (16.8%) and 57 (19.5%) patients belonged to intermediate, unfavorable and unknown categories, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 15 months (range, 1 to 94 months) in survivors, the probabilities of cumulative rates of relapse (CIR) , disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2-years were 51.6%, 42.6% and 60.0%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that MRD positive (defined as Q-PCR WT1 mRNA ≥0.6% or any level of abnormal blast population detected by flow cytometry) after achieving MLFS and PLT<100×10(9)/L were common adverse factors affecting CIR and DFS. In addition, positive FLT3-ITD mutation and CRp/CRi had negatively impact on CIR, DFS and OS. Monosomal karyotype was adverse factors affecting CIR and OS. Age ≥44 years and unfavorable-risk of SWOG criteria were associated with shorter DFS. Conclusions: MRD level after achieving MLFS had prognostic significance on outcomes in non-favorable adults with AML who received continuous chemotherapy after achieving MLFS.

Combination of cytogenetic classification and MRD status correlates with outcome of autologous versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia in first remission

Both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (auto- and allo-SCT) are treatment choice for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after complete remission (CR). However, the decision-making remains controversial in some situations. To figure out the treatment choice, we retrospectively investigated 172 consecutive patients with primary AML who received auto- (n=46) or allo-SCT (n=126) from a single transplant center. Auto- and allo-SCT group demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.616, P=0.559, respectively). Cytogenetic classification and minimal residual disease (MRD) after one course of consolidation were identified as independent risk factors for DFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.800; 95% CI, 1.172-2.763; P=0.007; HR, 2.042; 95%CI, 1.003-4.154; P=0.049; respectively). We subsequently found that auto- and allo-SCT offered comparable DFS to patients with favorable or intermediate risk and were tested MRD^neg after one course of consolidation (P=0.270) otherwise auto-SCT were inferior due to increased risk of leukemia relapse. Our study indicated that the combination of cytogenetic classification and MRD monitoring correlated with outcome of auto- versus allo-SCT and might help the choice between the two types of SCT for adults with primary AML, which is of significance for patients with expected intermediate prognosis in the current scenario.

Prognostic Significance of Residual Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Bone Marrow Samples Taken Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify features in routine evaluation of pre-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) bone marrow samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that influenced patient outcome.

METHODS

Of 140 patients, evidence of residual leukemia (RL) was identified in 38 (27%) of pre-HCT samples, as defined by 5% or more aspirate blasts, increased blood blasts, clustered or necrotic blasts on biopsy specimens, and/or leukemia-associated karyotypic abnormalities.

RESULTS

Morphologic or karyotypic evidence of RL was significantly associated with shorter leukemia-free survival (LFS) compared with cases without identifiable RL (median, 7.1 vs 28.3 months; P  < .0001). Upon multivariable analysis, RL, prior relapse, age, high-risk karyotype, and alternate donor source were each independently associated with shorter LFS. RL in pre-HCT samples was more strongly associated with shorter LFS in patients with intermediate or favorable-risk AML karyotype ( P  = .001) than secondary or adverse karyotype-risk AML ( P  = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous morphologic and karyotypic evaluation of pretransplant marrows is practical and important for posttransplant prognosis.

Relapsed childhood acute myeloid leukemia patient with inversion of chromosome 16 harboring a low FLT3 internal tandem duplication allelic burden and KIT mutations

Inversion of chromosome 16 [inv(16)] has a good prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but additional genetic aberrations influence the outcome. We herein describe the case of a 15-year-old Japanese boy with inv(16) harboring a low-allelic burden internal tandem duplication of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) and KIT mutations. Conventional chemotherapy eradicated a clone with a low-allelic burden FLT3-ITD mutation, although another clone with a KIT mutation occurred 17 months later. Further investigation is necessary to identify AML with inv(16) conferring poor prognosis, to facilitate appropriate treatment with additional drugs, such as dasatinib or gemtuzumab ozogamicin.

Postremission sequential monitoring of minimal residual disease by WT1 Q-PCR and multiparametric flow cytometry assessment predicts relapse and may help to address risk-adapted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia patients

Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients using prognostic parameters at diagnosis is effective, but may be significantly improved by the use of on treatment parameters which better define the actual sensitivity to therapy in the single patient. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has been demonstrated crucial for the identification of AML patients at high risk of relapse, but the best method and timing of MRD detection are still discussed. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed 104 newly diagnosed AML patients, consecutively treated and monitored by quantitative polymerase chain reactions (Q‐PCR) on WT1 and by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) on leukemia‐associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) at baseline, after induction, after 1st consolidation and after 1st intensification. By multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with adverse relapse‐free survival (RFS) were: bone marrow (BM)‐WT1 ≥ 121/10⁴ABL copies (P = 0.02) and LAIP ≥ 0.2% (P = 0.0001) (after 1st consolidation) (RFS at the median follow up of 12.5 months: 51% vs. 82% [P < 0.0001] and 57% vs. 81%, respectively [P = 0.0003]) and PB‐WT1 ≥ 16/10⁴ABL copies (P = 0.0001) (after 1st intensification) (RFS 43% vs. 95% [P < 0.0001]) Our data confirm the benefits of sequential MRD monitoring with both Q‐PCR and MFC. If confirmed by further prospective trials, they may significantly improve the possibility of a risk‐adapted, postinduction therapy of AML.